#AI paradox

[zomb13s]

The Forgotten Helpers: Artificial Intelligence, Capitalism, and the Suppression of Critical Voices

Your idea for an academic paper touches on many complex and interwoven concepts related to artificial intelligence, capitalism, mental healthcare, and societal power dynamics. Here’s a structured framework to develop this paper further while ensuring its themes and critical elements are cohesively connected. Abstract This paper explores the intertwined relationship between artificial…

[pokemonblack3white3]

I have so many aus where I put the BB League/company in Hisui one day I'm going to put Professor Laventon in Area Zero or something. Equality.

[matthew-neo]

based on that one Scott pilgrim image I saw, I thought it was funny.

[newtiative]

Curse of competence | @newtiative Chris Williamson (born 23 February 1988) is an English podcaster and YouTuber.

#motivation #entrepreneur #inspiration #learnfromfounders #Innovation #win #Future #money #investing #Startup #growth #hardwork #quotes #newtiative #paradox #entrepreneurship #businessadvice #motivation #entrepreneur #business #Innovation #Future #money #investing #ai #technology #AI #TechCEO #FutureTech #Innovation #Startup #growth #hardwork #quotes #newtiative

Learn from founders. Invest wisely. Achieve financial freedom.

Follow for expert analysis, inspiring stories, and actionable tips.

[peachjagiya]

Hybe works hard but jikookers and army work harder. Trying to ret-con the last 18 months because they can't cope with the reality that the boy they actively ostracised is the golden boys favourite.

There's so much to unpack here about Army's need to live in the past, in the comfort they seek from nostalgia and company created narratives and subtly pushed caricatures of real people. They crave a time before festa 22 because they cant fathom that bts are not going to become the glorious human centipide creation of bang pd once this pesky solo period...oops I mean military enlistment is done.

They'll give hit tweets to jkkrs because they want jkk to be the closet duo, they want tae to be their uninvited guest. But this distorted reality only exists in their limited little minds. The "hot chemistry" promised by the press release exists only between Jungkook and whatever food he's eating. Jkk have not spent any significant time together in a while and it is painfully obvious. They are out of sync, jungkook is confused by jimins jokes and dead airtime waffle. The conversations revolve around memes, other members or the past.

And thats OK, relationships change as people mature. But it's not ok for army.

Taehyung and jungkook made time to see each other as much as possible during this chapter 2, their relationship is not distant or awkward, no one has to interject and ask them to get closer, they've been attached at hip. They are a priority in each other's lives, no amount of opertune screenshots, weird captions or purposely missing the joke to push a victim narrative is going to change that reality.

Just because it's not presented on a Disney+ show with bird chirp sound effects doesn't mean it didn't happen.

👏👏👏

👑🎤 here, you dropped these.

[fortunaestalta]

[frank-olivier]

The Battle for the Truth: Science, Rhetoric, and the Public Sphere

Reality is nothing but a collective hunch. — Lily Tomlin

The pursuit of knowledge is marked by a paradoxical dynamic where systems embodying the principles of scientific inquiry, acknowledging their own incompleteness and embracing the provisional nature of truth, are frequently attacked by counterparts that proclaim absolute certainty yet often lack a foundation in empirical evidence. This phenomenon raises a profound question about why rigorously scientific systems, aware of their limitations, incur criticism from unscientific systems that claim completeness. The underlying reasons for this critique are rooted in epistemological, psychological, and sociological factors that drive this seemingly counterintuitive conflict.

At the heart of scientific systems lies an inherent humility, an acknowledgment of the complexity of the subject matter, and a willingness to revise or even overturn existing theories based on new evidence. This openness is not a sign of weakness but a hallmark of the scientific method, which thrives on skepticism, peer review, and empirical validation. However, this selfsame openness can be misconstrued by critics from closed systems as indecisiveness or uncertainty, providing a perceived foothold for attack. In contrast, closed systems often present themselves as comprehensive and definitive, eschewing the nuanced uncertainties of scientific inquiry for the comforting simplicity of absolute truths. This appeal to certainty resonates deeply with a public frequently overwhelmed by the intricacies of modern life, seeking clear, uncomplicated answers to complex questions.

A significant portion of the critique stems from a fundamental misunderstanding or deliberate misrepresentation of the scientific process. The iterative nature of scientific inquiry, where theories are refined or revised based on new evidence, is often portrayed as flip-flopping or lack of conviction. Critics from closed systems may fail to grasp or choose to obscure the distinction between the provisional nature of scientific knowledge and the method's robustness in approaching truth. Beneath the surface of these critiques often lie power dynamics and ideological differences. Closed systems may perceive scientific findings as a threat to their influence, audience, or worldview, prompting a defensive stance that manifests as attacks on the scientific system's legitimacy. Philosophical disagreements over the nature of truth, the role of empiricism, or the balance between consensus and dissent also fuel these conflicts, highlighting the deeply entrenched nature of these disputes.

To address this paradox, education and awareness are crucial. Enhancing public understanding of the scientific method can foster a broader appreciation for its strengths and the inherent value of acknowledging complexity. Scientists and science communicators must effectively convey the provisional nature of scientific knowledge, highlighting its adaptive and refining aspects as strengths rather than weaknesses. Encouraging respectful, open dialogue between proponents of different systems, while challenging, can facilitate mutual understanding and, in some instances, reconciliation of viewpoints. Strengthening science education and promoting clear communication are key strategies to navigate this paradox, ultimately fostering a more informed, critically thinking society.

The critique of scientific systems by unscientific counterparts underscores a profound misunderstanding of the scientific endeavor. Rather than a vulnerability, the acknowledgment of incompleteness is a badge of honor, reflecting the scientific community's unwavering commitment to the pursuit of truth, no matter how complex or provisional. Embracing education, clear communication, and engaged dialogue becomes paramount, not only for the integrity of scientific knowledge but for the fostering of a society that values critical thinking and the pursuit of knowledge. By navigating this paradox with awareness and strategies aimed at enhancing public understanding and dialogue, we can work towards a future where the scientific method is valued for its strengths, and the provisional nature of truth is seen as a catalyst for continuous learning and improvement.

Marjorie Shapiro: Supersymmetry, Extra Dimensions and the Origin of Mass - Exploring the Nature of the Universe Using PetaScale Data Analysis (Google Tech Talks, June 2007)

String Theory isn‘t Dead (Sabine Hossenfelder, December 2024)

The Problem With Sabine Hossenfelder (Professor Dave Explains, October 2024)

No, Sabine, Science is Not Failing (Professor Dave Explains, November 2024)

Lawrence Krauss: God, String Theory, and the State of Physics (Robinson Erhardt, March 2024)

Sabine Hossenfelder Can’t Stop Acting Like a Complete Fraud (Professor Dave Explains, February 2025)

Wednesday, February 26, 2025

[ginnsham]

cyberpunk

[claires-audience]

I like to think that there’s aliens out there watching us wrap our heads around trying to figure out time paradoxes the way animals react to seeing their own reflection, and finding it cute. They are probably laughing their assess off on alien instagram on every frickin time travel conspiracy page.

[davismaster01]

[indigodiskmybeloved]

EEEEE ANOTHER VIOLET FAN WOO

I don't care what people say I absolutely LOVE the future Paradox mons.

And like it allows for some interesting questions like your post said quduwjehwjeh

YES YES YESS

Like for dinos, oh they are just dinos that evolved or died cause meteorite or whatever

But future Paradox mons raise questions

Cause Iron Jugulis was the offspring of a Hydreigon that fell in love with a robot

Was it a standard robot or an already made Paradox Pokemon?

Are the future ones built or modified like Iron Boulder? Are the present versions even around anymore?

It's why I don't like the thing of "AI Turo got it easy! He got sent to the future and he can help himself if he gets hurt!"

Think about this. This is billions of years into the future, where most present day things are GONE. The technology may be so advanced that

1. AI Turo is technically "outdated technology" and the future may not have the resources to fix them or even help them

2. With robots running around, all humans must have gotten some kind of upgrade, right? AI Turo stands out among them. He is meant to replicate a man in the present, and a billion years later, he sticks out like a sore thumb. He doesn't belong there.

3. Who knows how the people there treat him, if at all? He could be casted out, or downright dismantled and have his soul be shoved in a new Paradox Pokemon. He's too mechanical to be human, and too human to be a Paradox Pokemon.

Both professors have issues of them going in different times, and I'm sick of people saying Turo got off easy

[newtiative]

Never stop Trying | @newtiative

#motivation #entrepreneur #inspiration #learnfromfounders #Innovation #win #Future #money #investing #Startup #growth #hardwork #quotes #newtiative #paradox #entrepreneurship #businessadvice #motivation #entrepreneur #business #Innovation #Future #money #investing #ai #technology #AI #TechCEO #FutureTech #Innovation #Startup #growth #hardwork #quotes #newtiative

Learn from founders. Invest wisely. Achieve financial freedom.

Follow for expert analysis, inspiring stories, and actionable tips.

[forexmastertrader]

Deepseek, NVDA и магията на математиката: какво наистина се случва?

Deepseek, NVDA и магията на математиката: какво наистина се случва? Въведение Събитията от вчера разтърсиха сектора на изкуствения интелект (AI), като повечето компании в тази индустрия претърпяха значителни спадове на цените на акциите си. Сред най-засегнатите бяха гигантите, които досега се възприемаха като непоклатими в лицето на технологичните промени. Пазарът реагира бурно на новината за…

[peachjagiya]

Did you ever stop and think why he posted their Hawaii pics just before AYS? Why he's been publicly out and about with his irl friends? Did you ever consider that he wants you to pay attention to HIM and not a scripted show meant to rebuild the narratives that TK have dismantled during solo era.

Once again you have fallen into Hybe's trap. All everyone is talking about is that show and the narratives it was designed to perpetuate. Tae prepared a lot of nonmusic stuff before he left (Jinny's, Pixid, Tiny Desk, Running Man, Dingo Story, Spotify interviews, numerous magazine interviews and Japanese shows etc) and you're ignoring all his wonderful solo content for AYS! He bared his soul in Suchwita and you're letting his words get buried under garbage Hybe content and antis' stupid arguments!

WAKE UP!!!! DON'T LET HYBE USE YOU TO MAKE THEIR CONTENT RELEVANT! DON'T LET HIS NAME GET STUCK IN HYBE'S NARRATIVES MEANT TO FUEL FANWARS! USE YOUR PLATFORM TO AMPLIFY HIS SOLO CONTENT TO HELP HIM TELL HIS OWN STORY USING HIS OWN WORDS! HE NEEDS YOU TO HYPE HIM UP!! DON'T LET HIM DOWN!!!!

Hmmmmmmmm.

I do not enjoy the tone here.

Ok so we stop talking about Hybe's abject failure. We stop bringing attention to how their greed for money led them to:

Capitalise on Tae's personality but treat him like trash

Embolden haters to hate even harder

Position Jungkook as a rough caveman and screw his debut schedule with no regard for his physical wellbeing

Construct a show so mindboggling in it's intentions that the reputations of all of them are being dragged through the mud

Show their whole ass.

We stop talking about that... Then what? Then Army keeps its head up it's ass and Hybe never gets the scrutiny they deserve? Jimkooks and Tae antis continue to control the narrative?

I haven't been here a super long time so my opinion might mean nothing but I've never seen people talking this much about how much Hybe suck. They're dropping the ball left right and centre and I think we should keep applying the pressure, actually. It's kind of wild that you think this is a win for Hybe when even the mainstream army and k-army are saying "this was really eye opening" in exactly the way Hybe would prefer they didn't.

People who are talking about it are not letting Tae down and it's also wild that you're framing it that way. We are supporting and promoting his work alongside calling out his mistreatment. I think if you go look at Tae or Taekook blogs here, you'll see we're as enthused about his words and work as we are dismayed by Hybe.

I dunno. This ask feels unnecessarily aggressive. I'm confused by it.

[miloalli14]

nvidia stock