#DoubleStandards

[girlactionfigure]

muslim_zionist18

Stop the madness.

[renegadeurbanmediasource]

Yet we're not supposed to recognize this or say anything. Wypipo act so damn superior! All the crap they've done to the world? Are you serious?

[eretzyisrael]

muslim_zionist18

It is not possible to live in peace with those who want to kill you.

[karenceightteen]

Let’s talk about the misogynoir happening on Love Island. Olandria and Chelley—two feminine, confident, dark-skinned Black women—are being dissected under a microscope. Every move, every glance, every normal human emotion becomes a debate. Meanwhile, others on the island move with freedom and are given grace without the same level of scrutiny. This isn't just about reality TV. It’s about how dark-skinned femininity triggers insecurity, competition, and discomfort #LoveIsland #Olandria #Chelley

wickdconfections

Let’s talk about the misogynoir happening on Love Island. Olandria and Chelley—two feminine, confident, dark-skinned Black women—are being dissected under a microscope. Every move, every glance, every human emotion becomes a debate. Meanwhile, others on the island move with freedom and are given grace without the same level of scrutiny. This isn’t just about reality TV. It’s about how dark-skinned femininity triggers insecurity, competition, and discomfort—especially in spaces where it’s not expected to lead, shine, or be desired.

Why are they held to a different standard? Why does soft confidence in Black women get called “mean girl energy”? We’re watching misogynoir in real time—and it’s time we name it. 🎯 Let’s unpack the double standards. Let’s talk about the coded language. Let’s protect our girls.

[doublestandardscomic]

deceptively cute promotional drawing. I hate them I hope they explode /aff

(Yes I know images of drawings like this can be annoying - In the future a lot of things will be scanned / done digitally! Please dont feel put off by this ;030)

[the-most-humble-blog]

When Men Stand on Business: Why Certain Segments Turn Feral and Misandrist

Standards, Respect, and the Double Standard Circus

Let’s get one thing straight: having standards as a heterosexual man is not an act of aggression. It’s a basic human right. Yet, the moment men start drawing boundaries or—heaven forbid—voicing their standards, certain segments of society (you know who you are 👀) start frothing at the mouth like a 2003 internet forum caught in a flame war. Why? Because some people have been conditioned to see men as providers, protectors, and silent sacrificers—but not decision-makers.

Well, newsflash: men are allowed to have standards too.

Standards Are Not Misogyny

Let’s address the big elephant in the room: having standards ≠ hating women. If a man decides he wants:

A partner who values loyalty,

Someone who prioritizes emotional maturity over Instagram likes,

Or just someone who doesn’t treat their relationship like a TikTok content generator,

...why does that spark an apocalypse of rage and accusations of being controlling, toxic, or—everyone’s favorite buzzword—misogynistic?

Ask yourself this: if it’s empowering for women to demand “a man who makes six figures, is 6’4”, emotionally intelligent, great in bed, and can recite poetry while doing a backflip,” why does it suddenly become "oppression" when a man wants a partner who doesn’t treat commitment like an afterthought?

The Misandry Playbook

Here’s where it gets spicy: when men dare to stand on business, certain segments of the crowd will hit you with:

Gaslighting 101: “Wow, you’re so insecure if you care about stuff like that.”

Shame Grenades: “Only a weak man feels the need to have standards. A real man accepts anything.”

Projection Olympics: “You just want a submissive maid, don’t you?”

**Name-Calling: "When logic is refuted or falls on intellectually deaf ears, insults become the tool of the emotional, hysterical, and emotionally unstable."

The irony? These are often the same people who post things like, “Know your worth, sis,” on social media while belittling anyone else for doing the same.

Why It's Time to Dish It Back

Here’s the truth: you can’t play defense forever. If certain people feel emboldened to call men trash for expressing their preferences, then it’s time for men to:

Be unapologetic. You don’t owe anyone an explanation for your boundaries.

Dish it back—tastefully but firmly. Call out the hypocrisy. Example: “So if you wouldn’t date someone broke, why is it wrong for me to avoid drama queens, 304's, and independent feminists?”

Stop pandering. Being agreeable at all costs isn’t “nice,” it’s self-destructive, and diminishes a man's status among other men.

Respect should go both ways, and if someone’s going feral over the idea of mutual standards, that’s their problem, not yours.

Let’s Not Pretend This is Fair

The moment you flip the script, watch how the conversation devolves:

"Who hurt you?"

"Not all women are like that!"

"You just hate women because you can’t get one!"

Oh, the classic ad hominem Olympics. These are tactics used to derail a conversation instead of addressing the real issue: standards are universal.

Final Truth Bomb

The simple truth is, a man who knows what he wants and sets boundaries isn’t toxic—he’s dangerous. Dangerous to the status quo, dangerous to complacency, and dangerous to the idea that men should just shut up and take whatever comes their way. So to those turning feral at the mere thought of men holding themselves to a standard, here’s a revolutionary concept: respect goes both ways.

Like, share, or watch me get cancelled for saying this: Certain people (you know who you are) will weaponize this truth bomb faster than you can say 'misandry.' They'll screenshot, twist, and predictably call me toxic—proving my point in real-time. Don't let 'em win.

[1d10tch1ld]

"It's fetishizations, your watering-down names!!" I am on the verge of another breakdown. Apparently I am never "pure" enough, just being white is "dirty".

I am sick of trans people divide themselves, and as a trans person I am sick of everyone assuming I am a bad person. it's bad enough that I get it from being trans, but apparently if your white and choose a non-Hebrew name your racist. Hebrew names derive from the bible, especially the Jewish bible, and there are barely even any "White" names as in AMERICA/BRITIAN. Also p.s. I deal with obsessive thoughts, and I am not in a good mental state so I am sorry if I accidentally offend people but calling someone "watering down" culture as in understanding the meaning and importance's behind a name is awful to say.

White people with names depriving from Asia are also likely to be targeted, and aren't the ones mocking Asian names. I, myself, don't have a chosen name really. I jump from name to name, but I am not going to sit there and shame someone for their chosen name. It's a similar thing to be kicking the enbies to the ground for choosing the name Arson. Despite that also being controversial, and the stereotype was always a skinny white "woman"/AFAB person to choose that name. People aren't trying to offend anyone over their names even if they did, stop making excuse to not give your child an Asian name if your so urged to gatekeep them. And also there are trans people who are half white/half asian (WASIAN!) who don't need people to mock them for both being Asian and using an Asian name as a half white person.

Even if you were to disagree how is it not racist to say someone is "watering" down your culture by participating or living in an Asian country. Everyone assumes you would immediately come from a western European country if your white, and trans but that isn't the case for everyone. A similar tactic has been used by Asian people to say they can't wear Kimono's or such.

[delicatuscii-wasbella102]

So, Tumblr live

I cant post art that has a nude in, but there can be ‘Babe Station’ on a live stream? 

[girlactionfigure]

muslim_zionist18

BBC is a complete piece of shit, this is clearly a appreciation for the Hamas. How world is okay with October 7th, where Jews were murdered, raped and kidnapped. And still 101 hostages are captivity of Hamas which not terrorist according to BBC.

[eric-sadahire]

Everyone believes in freedom of religion until a statue of Baphomet is erected

[immunobiz]

⚠️ Ouvrez les yeux! Pendant qu’on tolère tout au nom du multiculturalisme, des chrétiens sont massacrés dans le silence. L’Occident s’agenouille, pendant que d’autres décapitent. 😠✝️🩸🤐🔥 Réveillez-vous!

⚠️ Wake up! While we tolerate everything in the name of multiculturalism, Christians are being slaughtered in silence. The West kneels… while others behead. 😠✝️🩸🤐🔥 Time to open your eyes!

[mcomega]

Same love. Different lighting. Masculine love is shadowed and warned.

Feminine love is softened and safe.

This is the double standard. And we live it-- even when we love the same.

#queerart #doublestandards #masculinelove #femininelove #queervisuals #visualpoetry

[wherechaoswins]

wild how ppl think its worse to call out bullshit than to be the one doin the bullshit in the first place. like sorry for noticing i guess

[the-most-humble-blog]

WHY EVERYONE SECRETLY LOVES TOXIC MASCULINITY

(EVEN IF THEY PRETEND THEY DON’T)

There’s a strange paradox in modern society.

People love to shit on masculinity.

They blame it for wars, crime, aggression, and societal collapse.

They call it “toxic” while enjoying every single benefit it provides.

They demand “soft, emotional, sensitive men”—but won’t date them.

And here’s the dirty little secret:

Society DEPENDS on “toxic masculinity” to function.

The same people screaming about "fragile male egos" are the first ones to call a strong, competent, aggressive man when shit goes down.

And when the floodwaters rise? When the criminals break in? When their car breaks down in the middle of nowhere?

They don’t call a male feminist with a rainbow flag and pronouns in his bio.

They call a "toxic man"—someone society spent years trying to neuter.

And that? That’s the hypocrisy I’m about to gut-punch straight into oblivion.

Let’s get into it.

WHAT THEY CALL “TOXIC MASCULINITY” IS ACTUALLY WHY CIVILIZATION EXISTS

🔹 The skyscrapers you work in? Built by men with calloused hands, broken backs, and zero complaints.

🔹 The bridges you drive over? Engineered, constructed, and maintained by the “patriarchy.”

🔹 The emergency responders saving lives? 99% male.

🔹 The soldiers who protect your borders? 97% male.

🔹 The garbage men keeping disease from spreading? Almost all men.

Masculinity isn't toxic. It’s what keeps modern society from collapsing overnight.

But we don’t talk about that.

Instead, we tell men:

❌ “Be softer.”

❌ “Be more emotional.”

❌ “Be more feminine.”

And then we mock men for actually doing it.

Look at what happened when men listened:

Men stopped being aggressive. Now, women complain that modern men are “weak.”

Men stopped taking risks. Now, women complain there are “no real men left.”

Men stopped leading. Now, women are depressed because they “can’t find masculine men.”

The irony? The men who actually embody “toxic masculinity” are still winning.

Women want them.

Men respect them.

Society needs them.

The ones who “toned it down” got left behind.

And that brings me to the next lie modern society pushes:

WOMEN DON’T WANT THE “SOFT MAN” THEY SAY THEY WANT

Every time I hear a woman say, “I want a man who’s in touch with his emotions!” I already know she’s full of shit.

How do I know?

Because the data proves it.

📌 Tinder and dating app studies: Women swipe right on less than 5% of men—and they’re always the most aggressive, dominant, high-status ones.

📌 Marriage studies: Women file for divorce 80% of the time—often complaining their husbands are “too passive.”

📌 Relationship studies: Women lose attraction to men who cry too much.

And yet, the narrative is “Men need to be softer.”

No. They don’t.

They need to be capable.

Because the second a man shows too much vulnerability, what happens?

Women call it “the ick.”

They pull away.

They lose interest.

They look for another man—one who doesn’t break.

That’s not sexism. That’s biology.

And I don’t blame them.

A masculine man makes a woman feel safe.

An overly emotional, fragile man makes a woman feel like SHE has to be the man.

And guess what? That kills attraction.

The most feminist, pro-woman, “down with the patriarchy” women still dream about being ravaged by a Viking warrior, a mafia boss, a cowboy, or a billionaire with full control over every situation.

They don’t write books called “Fifty Shades of Crying.”

They want dominance, confidence, and strength—everything they claim is “toxic.”

So why the hell should men listen to the opposite of what actually works?

They shouldn’t.

THE WORLD ONLY SHAMES MASCULINITY UNTIL THEY NEED IT

The same people calling masculinity “toxic” have no problem demanding it when convenient.

When a woman is in danger, she wants a strong man to protect her.

When a fire breaks out, people want brave men to run inside.

When war starts, everyone wants a tough man willing to fight.

When a country needs rebuilding, people call masculine men to do the heavy lifting.

Society shames the men who built the world.

But when shit hits the fan?

Nobody calls a soft man.

They call the exact type of man they’ve been demonizing.

And they always will.

So what’s the takeaway here?

STOP APOLOGIZING FOR BEING A MAN

If you’re a man, you have two choices:

1️⃣ Try to fit the soft, weak, emotional mold society pushes—and get left behind.

2️⃣ Lean into your natural masculinity—be strong, be capable, be dominant—and watch life reward you.

The truth is, everyone secretly respects men who embody strength, power, and control.

Even the people who say otherwise.

So fuck the narrative.

Be aggressive when needed.

Be dominant in your space.

Be the kind of man who handles business—no apologies, no softness, no weakness.

Because when the world needs saving, it won’t be “soft men” who step up.

It’ll be the same “toxic” men they tried to cancel.

And I say, embrace that.

🔥 REBLOG if you're done apologizing for masculinity.

💬 COMMENT if you’ve ever seen someone secretly love what they call “toxic.”

🚀 FOLLOW for more unapologetic, no-BS takes on truth, men, and society.

[theloulouge]

Life Lens - Entry 198

Double Standard of Blame It’s wild to me how some people have the audacity to point fingers at you for how you reacted, but never stop to think about what they did that pushed you to that point in the first place. It’s almost like they forget that actions have consequences, or maybe they just choose to ignore that part because it’s easier to blame you than to own up to their behavior. I mean, no…