#EmotionalManipulation

[solarpunkpresentspodcast]

And we're back, baby!

6.1: How Dare Solarpunks Do OUTRAGE?!!! Ariel & Christina Discuss

Now streaming: some hot takes from your solarpunk aunties. Ariel and Christina consider why wallowing in negative feelings is just so delicious ... as opposed to wallowing in, you know, acts of kindness and feelings of compassion, which are just a bit more solarpunk. We live in an age of outrage, it seems: cancelling, social media mobbing, cyberbullying ... but also drawing attention to human rights violations, or dodgy political happenings, or just straight-up illegal goings-on! How can we tell whether our outrage is justified or not? How can we avoid emotional manipulation? Can we think of outrage as a solarpunk tool?

[connectedmindssocial]

Not all harm is loud. 💔 Sometimes, manipulation disguise itself as care, advice, or even love. It can be subtle, you lose pieces of yourself without realizing it.

Healing starts when you dare to name it. What subtle harm have you learned to recognize? Share below👇

[ryancrossfield]

Hooked on Outrage: How Media-Driven Anger Erodes Critical Thinking and Informed Discourse

The modern media landscape, designed to capture and retain our attention, often employs tactics that prey on our emotions, especially anger. By doing so, media outlets can achieve higher engagement and longer viewership, but this approach has significant cognitive and societal repercussions. Research has consistently shown that anger impairs our ability to think critically and reduces our attention to the quality of arguments, making us more susceptible to simplistic, emotionally charged messages over substantive, credible information. This creates a cycle where emotional manipulation by the media hooks people, but the cost is a general erosion of thoughtful discourse, reduced attention to argument quality, and an increased reliance on shallow cognitive processing.

Psychological studies reveal that anger is particularly effective at narrowing attention and impairing working memory. For instance, Van Dillen and Koole (2007) found that negative emotions like anger reduce the cognitive resources available for complex tasks. When people are angry, they tend to focus more narrowly and selectively on stimuli that confirm or fuel their emotional state, often ignoring information that might challenge or counter it. This effect is critical for understanding how media outlets use anger to hold viewers’ attention. When news is presented in a way that triggers frustration, outrage, or even indignation, viewers are less likely to process the content deeply, focusing instead on the visceral reaction. This emotional engagement may keep people hooked, but it diminishes their capacity to analyze the accuracy or credibility of the information they consume.

Media-driven anger also leads people to think in a more heuristic, less systematic way, as explored by Moons and Mackie (2007). Their research shows that anger leads individuals to rely on cognitive shortcuts rather than a thorough evaluation of arguments. In a state of anger, people are more likely to accept information that aligns with their existing beliefs or that seems emotionally satisfying, rather than information that is factually accurate or well-supported. This phenomenon is troubling in a media context, where narratives are often tailored to provoke outrage over particular issues, with little attention given to nuance or fact-checking. The result is an audience that is constantly stimulated but rarely critically engaged, vulnerable to confirmation bias and ideological manipulation.

The effects of "emotion-induced blindness" further compound this issue. According to Most et al. (2005), intense emotional stimuli, such as anger-provoking content, can cause a temporary cognitive "blindness" to subsequent information. When people encounter emotionally charged headlines or news segments, their ability to fully process what follows is compromised. In the case of media, this means that once viewers are riled up by a sensationalized story, their capacity to critically evaluate other points, counter-arguments, or follow-up information is significantly diminished. They become, in effect, cognitively "blinded" to any nuances or alternative perspectives, creating an echo chamber in which only the anger-inducing message resonates.

Moreover, anger-induced cognitive narrowing impacts how we listen and communicate, as demonstrated by Deffenbacher et al. (2003). They found that anger disrupts listening skills, creating cognitive distractions that prevent people from fully engaging with the content. When the media stirs up anger, viewers’ attention shifts from listening carefully to responding emotionally, making it difficult to process the information accurately. In media consumption, this means that viewers focus less on understanding complex issues and more on reacting to them. For instance, a story presented in a way that provokes anger might prompt viewers to focus on who or what they are supposed to be angry with, rather than on understanding the context, data, or implications of the issue at hand. This emotionalized listening reinforces tribalism and divides audiences along emotional lines rather than encouraging a well-rounded understanding of the facts.

By harnessing anger to captivate their audiences, media outlets can drive engagement and loyalty, effectively keeping viewers coming back for more. But the broader repercussions are severe. When people are angry, their ability to pay attention to the merits or credibility of what is being said is compromised. This means that media-driven anger doesn’t just keep people hooked—it fundamentally shapes how they interpret the information presented to them, often to the detriment of critical thinking. Media consumers, constantly bombarded by anger-provoking content, become accustomed to a more shallow form of processing information. They are more likely to accept arguments at face value, judge information based on emotional resonance rather than factual accuracy, and become less discerning about the sources they trust. In the long term, this pattern can erode public discourse, as fewer people are motivated or even able to critically assess the information they encounter.

The impact on society is far-reaching. As media increasingly relies on anger to drive engagement, audiences become less adept at distinguishing credible sources from sensationalistic ones. The constant stimulation of anger reinforces a mindset that prioritizes immediate emotional satisfaction over informed deliberation. Over time, this creates an environment where people are conditioned to seek out emotionally charged, simplistic narratives rather than nuanced, well-researched journalism. This shift has implications not only for individual well-being but also for public trust in media, political polarization, and the health of democratic discourse.

In an era of increasing media fragmentation and partisanship, understanding these effects is essential. Recognizing how anger impacts cognitive processing, attention, and listening skills gives us the tools to approach media consumption more mindfully. By becoming aware of these tactics, we can better guard against the cognitive traps of emotionally manipulative content. Developing a more critical approach means questioning not only the facts behind a story but also the motives behind its presentation. Why is this story being framed to provoke anger? What are the potential benefits to the source of this story for making people feel this way? And, crucially, is this anger detracting from a fair assessment of the facts?

Ultimately, the responsibility lies with both media producers and consumers. Journalists and editors must consider the ethical implications of framing stories in ways that provoke anger, especially when this tactic can hinder critical thinking and informed decision-making. For viewers, becoming aware of how anger impacts their cognitive abilities is a crucial step toward resisting manipulation. In a world where media can often be more concerned with clicks than credibility, the onus is on each individual to engage mindfully, questioning not just the story but also their own emotional response to it.

By slowing down, taking a step back, and focusing on content that encourages reflection over reaction, we can reclaim our cognitive autonomy and foster a healthier, more discerning approach to media consumption. This shift isn’t just about being more informed; it’s about developing the resilience to avoid being controlled by the emotional hooks that dominate modern media. Awareness of how anger impacts cognition can empower us to make more thoughtful choices about what we consume and, ultimately, allow us to break free from the cycle of shallow processing that has come to define so much of our engagement with information.

The research is clear: anger disrupts our ability to think deeply, listen fully, and engage critically. As long as media outlets continue to use this powerful emotion to capture attention, it is up to each of us to recognize the potential consequences and seek a more balanced, less reactive approach to the information we consume. In doing so, we can protect our cognitive resources, encourage deeper discourse, and resist the pull of manipulative narratives that prioritize profit over truth.

[amelia00000]

A Cop's Response to Drunken Emotional Blackmail

A law enforcement officer faces a drunk individual employing emotional blackmail. The article emphasizes the officer's adept handling of the situation by maintaining composure, prioritizing the immediate issue, and balancing empathy with the duty to uphold public safety. It underscores the crucial role of law enforcement training in preparing officers to navigate emotionally charged encounters, highlighting the need for resilience and professionalism in addressing such challenges. Learn More...

[tmarshconnors]

Signs Of Evil Manipulation

Signs of evil manipulation can vary depending on the context, but here are some general indicators that may suggest someone is engaging in manipulative and harmful behavior:

Deception: Manipulative individuals often employ deceit and lies to achieve their goals. They may present false information, twist the truth, or engage in gaslighting, making you doubt your own perceptions and reality.

Emotional manipulation: They use tactics to exploit your emotions and vulnerabilities. This could include guilt-tripping, emotional blackmail, or playing with your feelings to control your actions or decisions.

Isolation: Manipulative individuals may try to isolate you from your support network, such as friends and family. They want to limit your access to alternative perspectives and support systems that could expose their manipulative behavior.

Blame-shifting: Manipulators often deflect responsibility for their actions and blame others for their own mistakes or negative consequences. They may make you feel guilty or responsible for things that are not your fault.

Lack of empathy: Manipulative individuals often display a lack of genuine empathy or concern for others' feelings. They may exploit your emotions for their own benefit without regard for the harm they cause.

Control and power dynamics: Manipulators seek to exert control over others and establish a power imbalance in relationships. They may use tactics like intimidation, threats, or undermining your self-confidence to assert dominance.

Constant criticism: Manipulative individuals frequently criticize and belittle their targets to undermine their self-esteem and create dependency. They may focus on your weaknesses and insecurities, making you doubt your own worth.

Gaslighting: Gaslighting is a manipulative technique where the person denies, distorts, or trivializes your experiences, feelings, or memories to make you question your sanity or perception of reality.

Conditional affection and love: Manipulators often use affection, love, or approval as a reward for compliance or punishment for resistance. They may withhold affection, support, or attention to control your behavior.

Manipulative tactics: Manipulators employ various tactics to control others, such as manipulation through fear, charm, flattery, or excessive generosity. They may use these tactics to exploit your weaknesses and gain an advantage.

[sylviahubbard]

So… She Wants Her Fiancé’s Father. And Honestly, We Support Her. #delilahsdesire 💜♨️👍🏾Read|Rate| Review

Read Book | Leave Review | Book Page | Windfall Brothers | All Books by Authors Delilah was supposed to be planning her wedding, not getting tangled in lust-laced stares with Andre’s daddy. But Dag isn’t just any father-in-law-to-be… he’s the kind of man who radiates “ruin your life in the best way” energy. ⚠️This is not a drill: morally gray, electrically charged, and dripping in forbidden…

[margins-of-me]

When Conflict Is Repackaged as Intimacy

Someone told me recently that fighting is a form of intimacy.

And for a second, I wanted to believe that. Because yes, sometimes conflict does bring people closer—when it’s rooted in care, honesty, and mutual respect. When it’s two people trying to figure something out together, not one trying to dominate the other.

But that wasn’t what this was.

What he called “intimacy” didn’t feel intimate. It felt exhausting. It felt like being constantly misunderstood, then blamed for not being easier to understand.

He mocked things that mattered to me. He criticized my choices, then softened it with “just being honest.” He dismissed my feelings and told me my reactions were the problem.

Then, when I started to pull away, he reframed it: Wasn’t this connection? Wasn’t this closeness? Didn’t this mean we were real?

But it didn’t feel real. It felt like being managed.

He called the friction passion. He called the discomfort depth. He wanted me to believe that the push-and-pull was part of being known.

But the truth is: intimacy isn’t a fight you have to keep losing to prove you care. Real intimacy feels like safety, not defense. It’s quiet attention. It’s someone being curious about your needs—not arguing you out of them.

What he offered wasn’t connection. It was chaos with good branding. And I’m learning not to mistake one for the other.

[global1eventsscams]

Global1 Events is terrible

I was asked by a friend to work at one of these events while they were short staffed. These guys are the worst sort of people. The whole day consisted of working innocent people up into a frenzy and then pushing expensive (>$5000) products on them once they were in a suggestible state.

Everyone that went into their 'Property Investor Summit' had to sign a confidentiality agreement, though because I was a late hire they didn't ask me.

The 'summit' started at about 8:30 in the morning on a Saturday. They kept the doors to the main area closed while they counted the number of people waiting outside. When they knew how many people had turned up, they removed the excess chairs to give the impression of a 'sellout event'. Sounds pretty tame, though it got much worse.

There was a 'VIP' area, which was just marked with red tape on the floor at the front and center of the stage. The people that got to sit in this area had paid ~$40 for the privilege of being sold to, plus a DVD full of advertising.

Once everyone had sat down, the event began with a 'celebrity' property investor, Steve McKnight, talking about wealth. Except he didn't just talk about wealth. He talked about your feelings about wealth. He made people close their eyes and meditate on how it would feel to have all that wealth while he played music. He talked about how it's right to want all this wealth because it's about helping your family. It's about stopping your family from suffering because you don't have enough money. He flashed up some wealth related catch phrases and got people to repeat them back to him, he talked about personal empowerment and people just-like-you who have achieved so many great things. This went on for just over an hour.

A little way into the presentation the other hires and myself were taken out the back to talk about 'selling'. We were given the details of the product, and given a run through of the selling process. It was disgraceful. The $5000 'property apprenticeship' had a 24 hour cooling off period. 24 hours. These people didn't even have enough time to come down from their 'guaranteed wealth' high before they had a chance to get any money back.

When I asked the organisers whether 24 hours is enough time for this, my question was brushed off with a rubbish explanation about how it's OK because people 'don't try to get their money back'.

When we returned to the presentation room, the property guru, Steve McKnight, was talking about investments, and flashing up some testimonials for people whose lives had changed. Then he went through all the values of his product - The property apprenticeship. Arbitrarily assigning made-up dollar values to the services within. The final figure was $20 000. "$20 000!" he said, "Isn't that a small price to pay compared to how much you'll earn!". Then he took off more than half. "Because I believe in all of you, and I want to see you succeed, I'm going to give it to you for $9000!".

But he wasn't done, he said "Actually…. If you buy it today, it's yours for $4990!". He went on to justify the price some more, saying things like "I could've made this free, but then you wouldn't value it, the reason it's this price is so that you understand how valuable it is". Unbelievably, he followed up with "Do you think I need the money?"

His last incentive was that the first 25 people to join the life changing apprenticeship will get a DVD and book pack. I saw this pack, the book and DVD were both unrelated to property investing and very related to Global1s other speakers - the first 25 people got some more advertising.

As soon as he was done people were falling over themselves to get down to the back of the room to get signed up. I emphasized to those that came to me that there is only a 24 hour cooling off period, and that if they decide to pay by direct deposit they can go home and think about it before transferring the money. This approach almost worked with one lady who didn't have enough money on her credit card and needed to ask her husband, who had to work that day, to transfer more money to it.

The lady was anxious to put down her details before she missed the opportunity to hand over $4990. One of the regular Global1 staff heard this going on and informed her that if she didn't pay by credit card, she wouldn't get the 'first 25' benefit. When she realised she would miss out on the 'fantastic book and dvd pack' she decided "I can pay today, I can pay today'.

The next session was by Rowan Burn of Market First. More of the same, talked for 2 hours about ambiguous property concepts without any real detail, until it came down to joining his program. We were taken out the back again to learn about how to sell this product, and I was happy to see that the cooling off period was 90 days, and the value of the product was $3000.

Then we learned that the membership is actually free, and is talked up to be an expensive product until he 'decides' to hand out free membership vouchers to everyone in attendance. The trick here is that everyone who puts down their details for the free membership gets an one on one appointment with one of his sales reps in the following days. In this session they're sold a higher level membership for around $5000. They said back stage that their conversion rate is about 33%.

I felt terrible about the entire day, though I still got paid for it, so now I'm trying to alleviate some of that guilt by writing about my experience here. I don't want other people to go along to these events unprepared. If you do decide to attend a Global1 event, understand that you are there to be sold to, understand that they will try to make you feel a certain way to get you in the mood to buy. They'll use music, meditation, repetition, parroting, catch phrases, seating arrangements so that you'll buy their expensive products. Most of the event wouldn't be so bad, if they weren't rushing you into purchasing a product you might not be able to afford, without the opportunity to back out later on.

Also worth noting is that they were advertising their upcoming events. One of which is an internet marketing event - helping people to make money online through ecommerce sites and eBay. I work in internet marketing and I can tell you that everything that I read in the event overview will not work. At all. You will make no money from it, you will not get to number 1 in Google, you won't make a fortune with drop shipping and will probably pay Global1 thousands for the privilige. If these things worked as good as they say, they wouldn't risk telling you about them for free.

[global1eventsscam]

Global1 Events is terrible

I was asked by a friend to work at one of these events while they were short staffed. These guys are the worst sort of people. The whole day consisted of working innocent people up into a frenzy and then pushing expensive (>$5000) products on them once they were in a suggestible state.

Everyone that went into their 'Property Investor Summit' had to sign a confidentiality agreement, though because I was a late hire they didn't ask me.

The 'summit' started at about 8:30 in the morning on a Saturday. They kept the doors to the main area closed while they counted the number of people waiting outside. When they knew how many people had turned up, they removed the excess chairs to give the impression of a 'sellout event'. Sounds pretty tame, though it got much worse.

There was a 'VIP' area, which was just marked with red tape on the floor at the front and center of the stage. The people that got to sit in this area had paid ~$40 for the privilege of being sold to, plus a DVD full of advertising.

Once everyone had sat down, the event began with a 'celebrity' property investor, Steve McKnight, talking about wealth. Except he didn't just talk about wealth. He talked about your feelings about wealth. He made people close their eyes and meditate on how it would feel to have all that wealth while he played music. He talked about how it's right to want all this wealth because it's about helping your family. It's about stopping your family from suffering because you don't have enough money. He flashed up some wealth related catch phrases and got people to repeat them back to him, he talked about personal empowerment and people just-like-you who have achieved so many great things. This went on for just over an hour.

A little way into the presentation the other hires and myself were taken out the back to talk about 'selling'. We were given the details of the product, and given a run through of the selling process. It was disgraceful. The $5000 'property apprenticeship' had a 24 hour cooling off period. 24 hours. These people didn't even have enough time to come down from their 'guaranteed wealth' high before they had a chance to get any money back.

When I asked the organisers whether 24 hours is enough time for this, my question was brushed off with a rubbish explanation about how it's OK because people 'don't try to get their money back'.

When we returned to the presentation room, the property guru, Steve McKnight, was talking about investments, and flashing up some testimonials for people whose lives had changed. Then he went through all the values of his product - The property apprenticeship. Arbitrarily assigning made-up dollar values to the services within. The final figure was $20 000. "$20 000!" he said, "Isn't that a small price to pay compared to how much you'll earn!". Then he took off more than half. "Because I believe in all of you, and I want to see you succeed, I'm going to give it to you for $9000!".

But he wasn't done, he said "Actually…. If you buy it today, it's yours for $4990!". He went on to justify the price some more, saying things like "I could've made this free, but then you wouldn't value it, the reason it's this price is so that you understand how valuable it is". Unbelievably, he followed up with "Do you think I need the money?"

His last incentive was that the first 25 people to join the life changing apprenticeship will get a DVD and book pack. I saw this pack, the book and DVD were both unrelated to property investing and very related to Global1s other speakers - the first 25 people got some more advertising.

As soon as he was done people were falling over themselves to get down to the back of the room to get signed up. I emphasized to those that came to me that there is only a 24 hour cooling off period, and that if they decide to pay by direct deposit they can go home and think about it before transferring the money. This approach almost worked with one lady who didn't have enough money on her credit card and needed to ask her husband, who had to work that day, to transfer more money to it.

The lady was anxious to put down her details before she missed the opportunity to hand over $4990. One of the regular Global1 staff heard this going on and informed her that if she didn't pay by credit card, she wouldn't get the 'first 25' benefit. When she realised she would miss out on the 'fantastic book and dvd pack' she decided "I can pay today, I can pay today'.

The next session was by Rowan Burn of Market First. More of the same, talked for 2 hours about ambiguous property concepts without any real detail, until it came down to joining his program. We were taken out the back again to learn about how to sell this product, and I was happy to see that the cooling off period was 90 days, and the value of the product was $3000.

Then we learned that the membership is actually free, and is talked up to be an expensive product until he 'decides' to hand out free membership vouchers to everyone in attendance. The trick here is that everyone who puts down their details for the free membership gets an one on one appointment with one of his sales reps in the following days. In this session they're sold a higher level membership for around $5000. They said back stage that their conversion rate is about 33%.

I felt terrible about the entire day, though I still got paid for it, so now I'm trying to alleviate some of that guilt by writing about my experience here. I don't want other people to go along to these events unprepared. If you do decide to attend a Global1 event, understand that you are there to be sold to, understand that they will try to make you feel a certain way to get you in the mood to buy. They'll use music, meditation, repetition, parroting, catch phrases, seating arrangements so that you'll buy their expensive products. Most of the event wouldn't be so bad, if they weren't rushing you into purchasing a product you might not be able to afford, without the opportunity to back out later on.

Also worth noting is that they were advertising their upcoming events. One of which is an internet marketing event - helping people to make money online through ecommerce sites and eBay. I work in internet marketing and I can tell you that everything that I read in the event overview will not work. At all. You will make no money from it, you will not get to number 1 in Google, you won't make a fortune with drop shipping and will probably pay Global1 thousands for the privilige. If these things worked as good as they say, they wouldn't risk telling you about them for free.

[thejourneyofastrangerlife]

Drawing the Line at Manipulation

Today, my mother-in-law created another dramatic episode — her signature cleaning spree, the kind she uses to mask her narcissistic behavior. This comes right after yesterday’s argument, and honestly, it’s unbelievable. My husband, poor thing, doesn’t even see that she’s playing the victim again. I don’t know how to escape this loop of drama. Every time, I’m expected to let things go — that’s what my husband keeps saying — just so she can restart the same chaos again whenever she wants?

No matter what I do, it’s never enough. From now on, I will just let it be. Whatever she wants to do — it’s up to her. It’s no longer my problem. I’ve tolerated this for almost a year. She refuses to let go of her son and constantly finds ways to create tension, just to push him further away from me. Why am I always the one left to endure all this?

And here’s what’s been on my mind lately: tell me, what more am I supposed to do? I try to see things from my husband’s point of view, but even that leads to me being blamed or compared. What am I really in this household? A maid? Is a wife just an unpaid servant in her in-laws’ eyes? Is that what it means to marry — to become obligated not only to a husband but to his mother too?

Let me be clear: I am not a maid. I am a human being, a wife, a partner — and I deserve respect, care, and emotional safety. I am not being unreasonable for wanting to be seen, heard, and supported — especially by my husband.

In a healthy marriage, we are supposed to be partners, not someone’s scapegoat or domestic helper. I shouldn’t have to constantly earn my right to exist in my own home. And the constant pressure to justify my emotions, the emotional manipulation, the guilt — it’s draining and unfair.

All I’ve been asking is:

For my husband to see the reality and stop being blinded by guilt or obligation to his mother.

For him to help set boundaries with someone who refuses to respect them.

For me to be treated with the same basic decency I give to everyone else.

If he can’t step in and support me when I’m being mistreated, then we are not functioning as a team. And that’s something that needs to be addressed — honestly, directly, and without brushing it under the rug.

Sometimes, the strongest thing you can do is stop trying to please people who benefit from you staying small. I’m tired of shrinking myself to keep the peace. I deserve a life where I feel safe and respected — not one where I’m constantly trying to survive.

[newsfllare]

Global1 Events is terrible

I was asked by a friend to work at one of these events while they were short staffed. These guys are the worst sort of people. The whole day consisted of working innocent people up into a frenzy and then pushing expensive (>$5000) products on them once they were in a suggestible state.

Everyone that went into their 'Property Investor Summit' had to sign a confidentiality agreement, though because I was a late hire they didn't ask me.

The 'summit' started at about 8:30 in the morning on a Saturday. They kept the doors to the main area closed while they counted the number of people waiting outside. When they knew how many people had turned up, they removed the excess chairs to give the impression of a 'sellout event'. Sounds pretty tame, though it got much worse.

There was a 'VIP' area, which was just marked with red tape on the floor at the front and center of the stage. The people that got to sit in this area had paid ~$40 for the privilege of being sold to, plus a DVD full of advertising.

Once everyone had sat down, the event began with a 'celebrity' property investor, Steve McKnight, talking about wealth. Except he didn't just talk about wealth. He talked about your feelings about wealth. He made people close their eyes and meditate on how it would feel to have all that wealth while he played music. He talked about how it's right to want all this wealth because it's about helping your family. It's about stopping your family from suffering because you don't have enough money. He flashed up some wealth related catch phrases and got people to repeat them back to him, he talked about personal empowerment and people just-like-you who have achieved so many great things. This went on for just over an hour.

A little way into the presentation the other hires and myself were taken out the back to talk about 'selling'. We were given the details of the product, and given a run through of the selling process. It was disgraceful. The $5000 'property apprenticeship' had a 24 hour cooling off period. 24 hours. These people didn't even have enough time to come down from their 'guaranteed wealth' high before they had a chance to get any money back.

When I asked the organisers whether 24 hours is enough time for this, my question was brushed off with a rubbish explanation about how it's OK because people 'don't try to get their money back'.

When we returned to the presentation room, the property guru, Steve McKnight, was talking about investments, and flashing up some testimonials for people whose lives had changed. Then he went through all the values of his product - The property apprenticeship. Arbitrarily assigning made-up dollar values to the services within. The final figure was $20 000. "$20 000!" he said, "Isn't that a small price to pay compared to how much you'll earn!". Then he took off more than half. "Because I believe in all of you, and I want to see you succeed, I'm going to give it to you for $9000!".

But he wasn't done, he said "Actually…. If you buy it today, it's yours for $4990!". He went on to justify the price some more, saying things like "I could've made this free, but then you wouldn't value it, the reason it's this price is so that you understand how valuable it is". Unbelievably, he followed up with "Do you think I need the money?"

His last incentive was that the first 25 people to join the life changing apprenticeship will get a DVD and book pack. I saw this pack, the book and DVD were both unrelated to property investing and very related to Global1s other speakers - the first 25 people got some more advertising.

As soon as he was done people were falling over themselves to get down to the back of the room to get signed up. I emphasized to those that came to me that there is only a 24 hour cooling off period, and that if they decide to pay by direct deposit they can go home and think about it before transferring the money. This approach almost worked with one lady who didn't have enough money on her credit card and needed to ask her husband, who had to work that day, to transfer more money to it.

The lady was anxious to put down her details before she missed the opportunity to hand over $4990. One of the regular Global1 staff heard this going on and informed her that if she didn't pay by credit card, she wouldn't get the 'first 25' benefit. When she realised she would miss out on the 'fantastic book and dvd pack' she decided "I can pay today, I can pay today'.

The next session was by Rowan Burn of Market First. More of the same, talked for 2 hours about ambiguous property concepts without any real detail, until it came down to joining his program. We were taken out the back again to learn about how to sell this product, and I was happy to see that the cooling off period was 90 days, and the value of the product was $3000.

Then we learned that the membership is actually free, and is talked up to be an expensive product until he 'decides' to hand out free membership vouchers to everyone in attendance. The trick here is that everyone who puts down their details for the free membership gets an one on one appointment with one of his sales reps in the following days. In this session they're sold a higher level membership for around $5000. They said back stage that their conversion rate is about 33%.

I felt terrible about the entire day, though I still got paid for it, so now I'm trying to alleviate some of that guilt by writing about my experience here. I don't want other people to go along to these events unprepared. If you do decide to attend a Global1 event, understand that you are there to be sold to, understand that they will try to make you feel a certain way to get you in the mood to buy. They'll use music, meditation, repetition, parroting, catch phrases, seating arrangements so that you'll buy their expensive products. Most of the event wouldn't be so bad, if they weren't rushing you into purchasing a product you might not be able to afford, without the opportunity to back out later on.

Also worth noting is that they were advertising their upcoming events. One of which is an internet marketing event - helping people to make money online through ecommerce sites and eBay. I work in internet marketing and I can tell you that everything that I read in the event overview will not work. At all. You will make no money from it, you will not get to number 1 in Google, you won't make a fortune with drop shipping and will probably pay Global1 thousands for the privilige. If these things worked as good as they say, they wouldn't risk telling you about them for free.

[sambiencebtg]

Enter The Wise Mind On The Take With Tammy The Health Coach  @sambiencebtg ​

There’s no greater frustration of feeling stuck between where you are and where you need to go to unlock your potential. This phenomenon is a pandemic of the mind, and the cure is the wise mind. But what is the wise mind, you might ask? Well, that’s what we’re going to talk about here on The Take, with Tammy, the health coach, at Sambience BTG.

[0illuminated1]

The Lies That Keep You Weak: How False Narratives Steal Your Power and How to Take It Back

In this presentation, we uncover the most damaging lies that keep individuals weak, divided, and disempowered. From the illusion of powerlessness to emotional manipulation, societal conditioning, and the manipulation of truth by secret societies and elite groups, these false narratives are designed to control the masses. Learn how these lies limit your potential and how embracing truth, self-responsibility, and critical thinking can help you reclaim your inner strength and freedom. By shedding the illusions that hold you back, you can tap into your true power and become the strongest version of yourself.

[divyachoudhary01]

Sweet-Talkers || Flatterers-A Curse Don't Trust Sweet People || Meera Unplugged