#Tushar Mehta

[rightnewshindi]

सुप्रीम कोर्ट का रणवीर इलाहाबादिया को झटका: पासपोर्ट रिलीज से इनकार, दो हफ्ते बाद आने का आदेश!

Supreme Court: सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने मंगलवार, 1 अप्रैल 2025 को मशहूर यूट्यूबर और पॉडकास्टर रणवीर इलाहाबादिया को बड़ा झटका दिया है। कोर्ट ने उनके जब्त पासपोर्ट को रिलीज करने से इनकार कर दिया और उन्हें दो हफ्ते बाद कोर्ट में पेश होने का निर्देश दिया। यह फैसला ‘इंडियाज गॉट लैटेंट’ शो में कथित अश्लील टिप्पणियों से जुड़े मामले में चल रही जांच के बीच आया है। जस्टिस सूर्यकांत और जस्टिस एन. कोटिश्वर सिंह की पीठ…

[kamalkafir-blog]

मोबाइल फोन, गवाह और भाषण की स्क्रिप्ट... कर्नल सोफिया पर बयान देने वाले विजय शाह के खिलाफ जांच में SIT की रिपोर्ट में क्या?

[NEWS] मोबाइल फोन, गवाह और भाषण की स्क्रिप्ट… कर्नल सोफिया पर बयान देने वाले विजय शाह के खिलाफ जांच में SIT की रिपोर्ट में क्या? [SAMACHAR] Source link

[hc24news]

Waqf Act SC Hearing: SC ने सरकार को दिया सात दिन का समय, नई नियुक्तियों पर रोक, अब 5 मई को होगी सुनवाई

Waqf Act 2025: वक्फ (संशोधन) अधिनियम, 2025 के खिलाफ दायर याचिकाओं पर सुप्रीम कोर्ट में आज दूसरे दिन सुनवाई हुई. सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने केंद्र सरकार को जवाब देने के लिए एक हफ्ते का वक्त दे दिया है. सरकार की ओर से पक्ष रख रहे सॉलिसिटर जनरल तुषार मेहता ने कानून पर रोक लगाने के सवाल पर कहा, रोक लगाने का कोई आधार नहीं है. यानी, कोर्ट ने एक हफ्ते के लिए पुरानी स्थिति में बने रहने का निर्देश दिया है. हालांकि,…

[townpostin]

Centre Warns of Alarming Bangladeshi Influx in Jharkhand's Santhal Pargana

Solicitor General highlights demographic shift, decline in tribal population percentage The Centre has alerted the Jharkhand High Court about the growing presence of illegal Bangladeshi migrants in the Santhal Pargana region, raising concerns about demographic changes. RANCHI – The Jharkhand High Court was informed by the Centre of the alarming increase in the number of illegal Bangladeshi…

[ssagar543]

DAMS FMGE XPRESS (DFX) | Orthopaedics || Dr. Tushar Mehta

DAMS, a leading Institute for PG Medical Entrance Coaching, headed by Dr. Sumer Sethi and Dr. Deepti Bahl, Provides Specialized Programs for NEET PG, INICET, and FMGE, delivering exceptional coaching by expert faculty.

Website: https://www.damsdelhi.com/

Download Android App: https://shorturl.at/iCT38Download iOS App: https://shorturl.at/hqwzI

[odnewsin]

Waqf case: Nobody has right over government land even under waqf by user principle, Centre to SC

The Centre argued in the Supreme Court that no one can claim rights over government land and defended the Waqf Amendment Act, 2025. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta stated the law is constitutional with secular regulation.

[vomnews]

Waqf Amendment Act 2025: Top Court to hear a batch of petitions today

https://vomnews.in/waqf-amendment-act-2025-top-court-to-hear-a-batch-of-petitions-today/

[achieveednexus]

Supreme Court Denies Plea from Class 12 Students to Appear in JEE Advanced 2025

In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India has dismissed the plea of 18 Class 12 students who had sought permission to appear for the JEE Advanced 2025. The court clarified that such matters fall under the domain of educational policy and are not for judicial intervention.

The petitioners, who had completed their Class 12 exams in 2023, argued that while they were allowed to attempt JEE-Mains in 2025, they were unfairly excluded from appearing for JEE-Advanced, which serves as the gateway to admissions in the prestigious Indian Institutes of Technology (IITs).

The Court's Ruling on JEE Advanced Eligibility

The bench, consisting of Judges B R Gavai and Augustine George Masih, reasoned that the issue at hand was related to academic policy, making it outside the scope of judicial decision-making. The students' complaint arose due to a change in the eligibility criteria for JEE-Advanced, which initially allowed three attempts as of November 2024, only to reverse this decision on November 18, 2024.

The petitioners pointed out that while the change in policy allowed for three attempts in JEE-Advanced, they were excluded, creating an imbalance in opportunities for those from the 2023 batch when compared to students from the 2024 and 2025 batches.

Disparity in Attempts for JEE Mains and Advanced

The court questioned why there was a difference in the number of attempts allowed for JEE-Mains and JEE-Advanced. The bench noted, "Why not just two attempts for JEE-Mains as well?" highlighting a potential inconsistency in the number of attempts granted for both phases of the exam.

In defense of the policy change, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta informed the court that the reversal of the three-attempt policy was aimed at alleviating the undue pressure on students. He emphasized that the original intention was to prevent prolonged cycles of preparation that detract from their academic studies.

Policy Stability and Academic Planning

The court affirmed the revised policy by the Joint Admission Board (JAB), underscoring the importance of policy stability and careful academic planning. The ruling serves as a reminder of the balance between offering opportunities and managing the stress associated with competitive exams.

The JEE examination process is a two-step affair, with JEE-Mains held twice a year, followed by JEE-Advanced for eligible candidates.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the Supreme Court’s decision highlights the delicate intersection between educational policies and the opportunities provided to students. While the petitioners sought to challenge the new policy, the court emphasized the importance of adhering to academic policy and its long-term stability for the greater benefit of students.

For students, this ruling clarifies the eligibility framework for JEE-Advanced and emphasizes the importance of timely understanding and adapting to changes in academic policies.

[jan-media-tv]

Waqf Law Hearing in Supreme Court: Tushar Mehta's Strong Arguments Delay...

[kamalkafir-blog]

Waqf Amendment Act 2025 Supreme Court Hearing SG Tushar Mehta metioned Hindu Code bill to CJI BR Gavai Bench

[NEWS] वक्फ संशोधन कानून, 2025 के विरोध में दाखिल याचिकाओं में कानून को संविधान के अनुच्छेद 25 का उल्लंघन बताया गया है. अनुच्छेद 25 धर्म की स्वतंत्रता की गारंटी का अधिकार देता है. केंद्र ने याचिकाकर्ताओं की इस दलील पर तगड़ा जवाब दिया है. केंद्र की तरफ से सॉलिसिटर जनरल तुषार मेहता ने सुप्रीम कोर्ट में कहा कि हिंदू कोड बिल लाया गया और हिंदुओं, ईसाइयों, सिखों और बौद्ध समुदाय के अधिकार छीने गए तब तो…

[werindialive]

Day After SC Warning, Government Halts Key Waqf Law Changes Until May 5 

Just a day after the Supreme Court raised concerns about parts of the new Waqf Act, 2025, the Central Government has put major decisions under the law on hold until May 5. 

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta told the court that the government will not appoint any new members to the Waqf Boards or the Central Waqf Council. It also won’t change the status of waqf properties, including those known as ‘waqf-by-user’, which are currently notified or registered. 

The Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna, took note of this and said in its order that all waqf properties must remain as they are for now. This includes properties registered under the earlier Waqf Act of 1995. 

Court Seeks Written Response from Centre 

The Centre asked for a week to file a written reply before the court decides on any temporary orders. The three-judge bench — also including Justices Sanjay Kumar and K V Viswanathan — agreed to give the Centre, state governments, and Waqf Boards seven days to submit their responses. Petitioners can then file a reply within five days. 

Chief Justice Khanna clarified that the court is not blocking the law entirely but wants to make sure no sudden changes happen that could affect people’s rights while the case is being heard. 

Why the Court Raised Concerns 

On Wednesday, the Supreme Court had suggested that some parts of the amended law may need to be paused. These include: 

The addition of non-Muslims to Waqf Boards, 

The classification of properties as ‘waqf-by-user’, 

And giving district officials the power to change the status of waqf land. 

Solicitor General Mehta argued against an immediate stay, saying the law has a long history and was created after many public suggestions. He urged the court to first review documents and understand the full picture before making a decision. 

Next Hearing Set for May 5 

The court said it would treat five main petitions as lead cases and group the rest under them. It also clarified that the May 5 hearing will be preliminary and may lead to further interim orders if needed. 

This hearing will take place before CJI Khanna’s retirement on May 13. Read top news headlines India in Hindi by subscribing our newsletter!

[kknnews]

Waqf Amendment Act: Supreme Court Deliberates on Controversial Provisions, Tushar Mehta's Assurance and Political Implications...

[creative-pens]

Maulana Razvi Accuses Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam Leader Vijay of Insulting Islam in Films and Events

Bareilly/Chennai – In a significant development stirring political and religious conversations across the country, Maulana Shahabuddin Razvi Bareilvi, President of the All India Muslim Jamaat, has issued a fatwa against Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK) chief and popular Tamil actor-turned-politician Joseph Vijay Chandrasekhar, commonly known as Vijay. The religious edict accuses him of misrepresenting the Muslim community in his films and disrespecting Islamic traditions during a recent Iftar event.

Speaking to ANI on Wednesday, Maulana Razvi condemned the TVK chief for allegedly inviting individuals known for gambling and alcohol consumption to an Iftar party hosted in March. He also criticized Vijay’s filmography, asserting that the actor has depicted Muslims in a negative light, particularly as perpetrators of terrorism, which he described as unacceptable and deeply offensive to the sentiments of the Muslim community.

"He (Vijay) has formed a political party and maintained cordial relations with Muslims. However, he has portrayed Muslims in a negative way—as those who spread terrorism—in his films. Gamblers and liquor consumers were invited to his Iftar party," Razvi said.

🔥 Sunni Muslim Discontent Fuels Religious Backlash

The issuance of the fatwa comes amid growing discontent among sections of Sunni Muslims in Tamil Nadu, who reportedly approached Maulana Razvi seeking a formal religious response to the controversy. According to the cleric, their concern centered around what they described as insulting and inappropriate conduct during a sacred religious event.

“Due to all this, Sunni Muslims of Tamil Nadu are angry with him. They asked for a fatwa. So, in my answer, I have issued a fatwa mentioning that Muslims should not stand with Vijay," the Maulana added.

The statement has sparked a wider debate about the intersection of cinema, politics, and religious sensitivity, especially as Vijay continues to consolidate his political presence through the Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam, a regional party he founded with aspirations of social justice and inclusive governance.

📜 Vijay’s Legal Challenge to Waqf Act Amid Fatwa Controversy

Coinciding with the fatwa announcement, TVK President Vijay recently moved the Supreme Court, challenging the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025. His petition questions the constitutional validity of the amended legislation, which has been met with criticism from various quarters for allegedly centralizing religious administrative control and enabling arbitrary property disputes.

On Wednesday, a three-judge bench led by Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna, along with Justices P.V. Sanjay Kumar and K.V. Viswanathan, began hearing a batch of petitions contesting key provisions of the Act. The court acknowledged the sensitivity of the issue and hinted at passing an interim order that would suspend certain controversial sections of the legislation.

“The one thing that is very disturbing is the violence that is taking place. The issue is before the court, and we will decide,” said Chief Justice Khanna, referring to unrest reported in West Bengal’s Murshidabad district linked to the Waqf issue.

Although no interim order was passed during the session, the bench discussed possible provisions for temporary relief, including:

Suspending de-notification of properties declared as Waqf by courts.

Allowing Collectors to continue proceedings on disputes, but without enforcing new provisos.

Ensuring that members of Waqf Boards and Central Waqf Council (except ex officio roles) are Muslims, preserving religious integrity.

Before the court could issue a written directive, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the Centre, requested the bench to allow more time for arguments from parties supporting the Act.

⚖️ A Complex Political Landscape for Vijay

The dual developments—one judicial and the other religious—present a complex political landscape for TVK chief Vijay, who is already preparing for a deeper role in Tamil Nadu's politics ahead of upcoming elections.

While his legal activism against the Waqf (Amendment) Act may align him with sections of the Muslim community opposing centralization of religious matters, the fatwa and its implications could erode the support he has cultivated through symbolic gestures like hosting Iftar and wearing a skull cap at community events.

The TVK party, which positions itself as a progressive and secular alternative in Tamil Nadu politics, now faces a challenge in addressing this religious criticism without alienating either its core voter base or the state’s significant Muslim population.

🔍 What’s Next?

With the Supreme Court likely to revisit the Waqf petition soon and political temperature rising over religious sensitivities, all eyes will be on how Vijay and the TVK leadership respond to the fatwa and the growing criticism. Whether this controversy becomes a hurdle or an opportunity for recalibration remains to be seen.

[seoulworldupdate]

TVK Chief Vijay Faces Fatwa Over Iftar Party Amid Waqf Act Controversy

A fresh controversy has erupted as TVK chief Vijay has come under fire from a prominent Muslim cleric over his recent Iftar party, even as he challenges the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, in the Supreme Court.

Maulana Shahabuddin Razvi Bareilvi, the president of the All India Muslim Jamaat, issued a fatwa against the Tamil actor-turned-politician for allegedly portraying Muslims in a negative light in his films and inviting individuals associated with gambling and alcohol consumption to his Iftar gathering.

“Though TVK chief Vijay has formed a political party and has maintained cordial relations with Muslims, he has portrayed them negatively in his movies, associating them with terrorism,” Maulana Razvi told ANI on Wednesday. “Moreover, gamblers and liquor consumers were invited to his Iftar party. This has upset Sunni Muslims in Tamil Nadu. Based on their appeal, I issued a fatwa advising Muslims to distance themselves from him.”

This religious censure comes amid a politically sensitive time for TVK chief Vijay, who has recently moved the Supreme Court challenging the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025. On Wednesday, a three-judge bench led by Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna heard multiple petitions questioning the constitutionality of the new law.

The court expressed concern about reported violence in West Bengal’s Murshidabad district related to the issue and indicated it may soon pass an interim order staying key provisions of the Act.

The proposed interim order is expected to address:

Preventing the de-notification of properties declared as Waqf by courts, regardless of their usage history.

Suspending the proviso empowering collectors in waqf property disputes.

Ensuring only Muslim members (except for ex officio ones) are appointed to Waqf Boards and the Central Waqf Council.

Although Chief Justice Khanna was ready to dictate the order, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta requested that the Centre and other parties defending the Act be allowed to present arguments before any decision is finalized.

As the political and legal battle surrounding the Waqf Act intensifies, the religious backlash adds another layer of complexity to TVK chief Vijay’s foray into national politics.