#and some of the arguments are based on common law perspective

[luck-lasts]

Please correct me if I am wrong because I am slightly fuzzy on the details, but why is it assumed that the actions done by JGY were purely in self preservation? I don't think we can believe all his claims at Guanyin Temple, because A) He was already established as a manipulative character and B) He was trying to convince LXC, his only potential ally, of his innocence. I am genuinely asking because from how I interpreted the text (purely subjective), it doesn't seem like we are supposed to believe everything he says.

And once again, I am fuzzy on the details, but the curse on Jin Zixun, or even the killing of Nie Mingjue doesn't make sense as an act of protection, because if I recall correctly, JGY had been in the process of somewhat regaining the trust of NMJ, which would have allowed him to turn the situation in his favour. Also, if we do talk about his primary motive to get to a position of safety, how do we determine what this position is? Is Chief Cultivator the only position where he is truly safe? Or would the future reign of Jin Zixuan, who treated him better than his father did, mean a better, safer position for JGY, if he had bided his time? Power means safety, absolutely, but at what point do we say his actions stopped being for protection and started being solely for power? I think that depends a lot of how individuals intepret the Guanyin Temple scene, so there won't be an objective answer.

In matters of intent, I am unfortunately a corp lawyer who really misses studying criminal law, and any discussion of mens rea will have me rambling way more than anyone would want. So to summarize my views, I would say intention matters because without intention it becomes very difficult to determine the morality of any action ( basic example would be why there is a lesser punishment for manslaughter than for culpable homicide). How dangerous someone is does matter, but your culpability for causing that danger again ties back to intention. (which is why someone who is legally unsound may be more dangerous than a legally sound person, but is seen as less culpable) (also relevant is that it is indicated that WWX, by a point, had become unstable, and while not unsound, was not fully in his right mind either).

Basically, from my perspective, WWX made horrible, horrible choices, which caused a lot of damage. If he had done so with malice, the consequences would be far far worse, and I agree, the Wens would not have survived because it would have triggered even worse escalation. JGY also made horrible, horrible choices., some of them out of necessity. But as per my interpretation (again, very subjective), he didn't just do it with the aim of self-preservation, he did it with malice, for political gain. And intention cannot be eliminated as a relevant consideration, because once we do that, we reach a slippery slope of essentially legal and moral chaos (not going to expand because I guarantee, I will end up rambling, but this is the most agreed upon perspective in most branches of jurisprudence, not sure about it works in moral philosophy).

Really sorry about how all over the place this reblog is, just putting my thoughts out there. TLDR; The veracity of JGY's claims is doubtful, and his actions show malicious intention. Intention absolutely matters, and that is what sets WWX and JGY apart.

As much as I love and appreciate fandom metas, especially in mxtx fandoms, a lot of times I find myself thinking "the book is deep but not THIS deep". There are many layers, but there is clear intention from the author in portraying things a certain way. Acting like Wei Wuxian is a villain and Jin Guangyao is a poor meow meow who did all of this because he was poor just detracts from the fact that both characters had a certain level of autonomy and they used it in very different ways. Despite his flaws, Wei Wuxian used his abilities to help the innocent. Jin Guangyao, despite how much he sufferered, chose to murder and destroy lives because he wanted to be at the top. His background humanizes him, it isn't intended to justify his actions.

[tuesdayisfordancing]

Unfortunate as it is, copyright law is the only practical leverage most people have to fight against tech companies scraping their work for commercial usage without their permission, especially people who also don't have union power to leverage either. Even people who prefer to upload their work for free online shouldn't be taken advantage of; Just because something is available for free online doesn't mean that it's freely available for someone to profit from in any way, especially if the author did not authorize it.

Okay Nonny. Bear with me, you’re not gonna like how I start this and probably not how I finish it either, but I do have a point in the middle. So.

There is in fact long established precedent for people being allowed to profit off of various uses of others’ work without permission, in ways that creative types in general and fandom specifically tend to wholeheartedly approve of. Parody, collage, fanart commissions, unauthorized merch, monetized reaction or analysis videos on youtube, these are significantly clearer cut examples of actually *using* copyrighted material in your own work than the generative ai case. And except for fanart commissions and unauthorized merch, which mostly live off of copyright holders staying cool about it, these are all explicitly permitted under copyright law.

Now, the generative ai case has some conflicting factors around it. On the one hand, it’s not only blatantly transformative to the point where the dataset cannot be recognized in the end result (and when it overfits and comes out with something not sufficiently transformative, that’s covered by preexisting copyright law), it also doesn’t exactly *use* the copyrighted work the way other transformative uses do. A parody riffs off a particular other work, or a few particular other works. A collage or a reaction video uses individual pieces of other works. Generative AI doesn’t do that, it comes up with patterns based on having looked at what a huge number of other works have in common. Like if a formulaic writing/art advice book were instead a robot artist. But on the other hand, the AI that was trained is potentially being used to compete in the same market as the work it was trained on. That “competition in the same market” element is why fan merch and fanart commissions rely on sufferance, rather than legality. That’s part of fair use too. So perhaps there’s some case to be made against AI from that perspective. *But*… the genAI creations, while competing in the same market as some of their training data, are *a lot more different from that training data* than a fanart is from an official art. To a significant degree the most similar comparison here isn’t other types of transformative work it’s… a person who learns to write by reading a lot. They’ll end up competing in the same market as some of *their* training data too. But of course that doesn’t *feel* the same. For starters, that’s *one person* adding themselves to the competition pool. An AI is adding *everyone who uses the AI* to the competition pool. It may be a similar process, but the end result is much more disruptive. Generative AI is going to make making a living off art even harder - and even finding cool *free* art harder - by flooding the market with crap at a whole new scale. That sucks! It’s shitty, and it feels hideously unfair that it uses artists’ work to do it, and people have decided to label this unfairness “theft”. Now, I do not think that is an accurate label and I’ve reached the point of being really frustrated and annoyed about it, on a personal level. Not all things that are unfair are theft and just saying “theft” louder each time is not actually an argument for why something should be considered theft. An analogy I like here: If someone used art you made to make a collage campaigning against your right to make that art (I can picture some assholes doing this with, say, selfies of drag queens), that would feel violating. It would feel unfair. It would suck! But it wouldn’t be theft or plagiarism.

…*And* on whatever hand we’re on now, my own first thought *was* “Okay well, on the one hand when you look at the mechanics this is pretty obviously less infringing than collage or parody, which I don’t think should be banned, but… maybe we can make a special extra strict copyright that applies only to AI? Just because of how this sucks.” And you know, maybe I’m wrong about my current stance and that’s still a good idea! But there seems to be a lack of caution regarding what sorts of rulings are being invited. It seems like some people are running towards any interpretation of copyright that slows down AI, regardless of what *else* it implies. Maybe I’m wrong! I’m no expert. Maybe it’ll be fine and maybe I’m just too pissed at anti-ai shit to see this clearly. I really wish the AI people had done open calls requesting people to add their work to the datasets, for which I think they would have gotten a lot of uptake before the public turned against AI. Maybe if we do end up with copyright protections against AI training that’ll happen and everything’ll be drastically improved. I dunno.

But I get fucking nervous and freaked out at OTW sending DMCA takedowns as a form of agitation for increased copyright protection and I think that’s a reasonable emotional response.

[kingjasnah]

idk if this has been discussed but i do wonder if there was a way jasnah could have won over fen. jasnah calls her very emotionally intelligent and she only started responding positively to dalinar in ob once he got truthfully frustrated with her and did some yelling and idk i wonder if jasnah had set aside all her philosophical talk and made a passionate and emotional plea if fen would have been more receptive. but of course jasnah wouldn't do that

short answer: agreed. long answer: ive been wanting to talk about this for weeks. so you're getting kinda a long one.

jasnah is obviously one of my favorite characters and that's almost why i was clapping and cheering during the taravangian takedown--like all of her flaws and everything that makes her compelling was completely cracked open. if jasnah cares about anything at all, it's how she is perceived. we dont know what happened to her when she was a child and we dont know why it seems that she was institutionalized or at least in confinement for a period of her youth but we do know that every single thing she does is a measure to keep her from never going back to the kind of powerlessness she felt back then. i remember shallan commented on her perfect her hair and makeup and clothing was waaay back in book 1/2 and thought how interesting it was for a self professed heretic to still take care to make sure the darkeyed sailors on their ship to the shattered plains never saw her out of makeup. jasnah has been vulnerable in this series, sure, but only to her family. or maybe shallan. or maybe hoid? persumably. every single page she has appeared on in this entire series has reinforced that to her a huge part of the way she does her job (and im considering hiring a spy to follow her sister in law her job too, not just being queen. i mean what she considers her role to be in her family) of statecraft is in the perception that she is perfect. and yeah, that's why it was never going to work with fen

dalinar did have a hard time cracking fen because i think that in the beginning of their interactions they both made fundamental misinterpretations of each other based on where they came from. fen only thought of dalinar as a warmonger who would walk all over her country in the name of conquest, and dalinar straight up did not understand that fen's perspective was so heavily influenced by the thaylen mercantile culture. they still found common ground and yeah it was a frank conversation and an abandoment of diplomat speak that did it. jasnah's made emotional pleas before but i think the crux of her error with fen is that she DID know how important the mercantile culture was but she interpreted it as "fen is going to leave the alliance if she gets a better deal for her country so i need to prove that im her best option" instead of "fen values exchange of commerce but she really values relationships. fen's culture involves building relationships with other merchants so that they can trade with each other and understand each other" (please see the original two rysn interludes). fen didn't need a perfect argument from jasnah but she also didn't need dalinar's approach either. all she needed was for jasnah to TRUST her enough to treat her like an equal partner in their alliance instead of a marker to be moved around a war map.

cause let's be honest. fen is an extremely capable ruler. she's smart and she's been in power for a long time. i do not think for a second that she was genuinely aghast that jasnah sent spies after aesudan or well, the kharbrath murders were pretty bad but im certain that a middle aged to senior member of ruling nobility has seen worse. it's not a bad thing for jasnah to put her people first. i am convinced that fen felt betrayed because jasnah had already set the parameters of their relationship by even engaging in this debate with taravangian. fen saw her logic backfire on herself and went "oh. okay. you are putting YOUR people first because you do not see the thaylen people as having the kind of relationship to you as, for example, vstim had with the shin or with the reshi king. you see us as an argument to be won over, as numbers on a map, as a thought excersize. not onyl withh you walk all over my country in the name of conquest (like dalinar might have) but you'd do it for the sake of what, rhetoric??" in that way, at least taravodium was honest.

but yes. jasnah would never do that. jasnah put on a full face of makeup every morning in her cabin just in case a handful of sailors that she never learned the names of would see her. of course she would never let a queen that she respected see her worry for her kingdom on purpose but it's over now. the mask has cracked, she lost, and she knows that the trap she fell into only closed around her because of her own hubris/the kind of love you have for winning that you'd have to have in order to spend your pre-apocalypse time actively arguing about heresy with every scholar and ardent out there. taravangian's arguments would not have worked on fen if jasnah had never put her in the position to be won over in the first place. i cannot stress enough that jasnah was my first love in this series and watching her finally crack and expose what i have always considered to be the most interesting thing about her was easily one of my favorite moments in the book. insane shit. i can't wait to see how she builds herself back up.

[apilgrimpassingby]

Hi! I'm a fellow young guy in America discerning converting to Orthodoxy from Methodism, and I was wondering if you had any advice pertinent for someone from this tradition. The question is this: I know you said before you dislike Calvinism, but how do you feel about Protestant Arminianism? What do you feel Wesleyan-Arminianism lacks when compared to Orthodoxy theology?

Thanks.

This is a really fun ask, thank you!

I don't know a lot about Methodism and what I do know I like (entire sanctification, giving to the poor and working for social justice, free will), so this will be a more general overview of my problems with Protestantism.

The biggest one - sola scriptura. Specifically, I oppose any idea of there being one authority to which all the others must submit, whether that authority is Holy Scripture (in Protestantism) or the Magisterium (in Roman Catholicism). Rather, what's authoritative is what's part of the received body of teaching and practice of the Church, whether that be Scripture, the Fathers, oral Tradition or the Ecumenical Councils, and none of them need to be "proved" by the others, because the Holy Trinity, not any of Their teaching, is the "final authority".

My other problem with sola scriptura is that they need to argue for a specific version of the text (usually a reconstructed "original text" based primarily on the Masoretic Text) as "the authoritative one", because if Holy Scripture is being used to judge everything else then you need to be very clear what is and isn't Holy Scripture. But that's simply not what I see in Church history - in the Patristic period, Greek Christian communities used the Septuagint, Latin Christian communities used the Vulgate, Syriac Christians used the Peshitta, and so on, without viewing each other as any more or less valid for it. And that's before getting into the issues of different canons or with the Masoretic Text's position as "the original text" being dubious, or the problems with the idea of "the original text" at all (on the last topic, Fr. Stephen DeYoung has a very good article).

On the other big sola (sola gratia, solus Christus and sola Dei gloria would, at least in some form, be affirmed by everyone), sola fide has, to my mind, been effectively discredited by the New Perspective on Paul; if you haven't heard of it, it effectively says that the passages Protestants interpret as teaching sola fide are instead teaching that faithfulness to Christ saves, and Jewish identity markers ("the works of the Law") do not. I think this makes more sense on pretty much all counts. (If you want more on the New Perspective, Fr. Stephen DeYoung's Bible study podcast, The Whole Counsel of God, goes over St. Paul's works from the New Perspective).

One of the most common arguments against Protestantism, and one that I do think is good, is that the New Testament and the Fathers give no mandate for establishing your own church, and indeed, evidence to the contrary. St. Paul never told the Galatians or the Corinthians to split off from the messes that were their churches, and St. Athanasius never tried to found his own church despite being expelled by the Arians multiple times. The standard issue YouTube classical Protestant apologist (if you don't know what I'm talking about, I envy you) will reply that the Reformers agreed, which honestly makes me respect Protestantism less; their position amounts to "schism is always wrong ... except when the Reformers did it!"

Most Protestants don't use typological exegesis, and those who do don't use it as their primary mode of exegesis. Which I vehemently disagree with - St. Peter (1 Peter 3:20-21), St. Paul (Galatians 4:21-31, 1 Corinthians 9:8-12) and Christ Himself (John 3:14) all used it, as did the Fathers from the earliest days (for example, the Epistle of St. Barnabas). Even the Fathers who sometimes get cited as opposed to it, such as St. John Chrysostom, still used it (for example, Homily 27 on Hebrews), they just had reservations about how widely it could be used.

The saints. The beauty of an eternal communion of love and prayer, unbound by time or space, is something not to be underestimated. Particularly the Theotokos; the Theotokos has done so much good for me and brought so much beauty into my life that I don't think I'd tolerate Christianity without her.

Almost every Protestant church in the West is modernist, from Evangelicals going "our traditional theology has rock music and a pastor in jeans!" to mainline Protestants going "our traditional liturgy has social justice and progressive theology!" This is exactly where the standard-issue YouTube Protestant apologist will say #NotAllProtestants. But it's most of them, and almost all of the ones who are culturally visible. Related to this, I think the attraction of the thoroughgoing traditionalism of Orthodoxy isn't solely or even mostly about "retvrn to tradition" (despite what the media and much of internet Orthodoxy says); it's that, in a world supersaturated with people trying to sell us things, a church that makes no effort to attract people is, paradoxically, profoundly attractive.

There's probably more, but that's it for now. Thanks for the ask!

[evidence-based-activism]

Is there any evidence that kink is bad for victims? Ppl love to say cnc is good cope for SA victims do their claims have any base?

Hi anon!

Unfortunately, there is very little research on this topic. Given the cultural taboos around sex in general and kink specifically, this isn't very surprising. I'll summarize what I did find below:

This thesis [1] argues that "the consent narrative that is used to justify sadomasochistic violence is flawed ... making two arguments .. that the conditions which need be met for consent to be valid are frequently not met in instances of sadomasochistic violence [and] ... that even when consent meets the conditions for validity this does not justify sexually motivated violence as consent does not have the normative power required to justify the infliction of harm."

This book chapter [2] "highlight[s] how easily sexual behavior within a coercively controlling relationship can be presented as consensual" and argues that "that there should be a strong legal presumption that if a relationship is marked by coercive control that sexual behavior within it is non-consensual". They also note that:

"Rough sex" is a "hallmark" of coercive control.

Strangulation is particularly prevalent in coercive control.

Among heterosexuals involved in BDSM, 71% of women identified as submissive and 75% of men identified as dominant (indicating a strong gender difference resembling patriarchal social inequality).

A significant aspect of coercive control is that victims can come to accept the abuse, seeing it as normal (i.e., later in the relationship they "consent" to the abuse because they believe it is appropriate). They indicate this makes it "challenging" to identify "genuine" cases of consent.

The legal system often presumes consent even in extreme situations and there is a growing cultural norm expecting "rough sex" in relationships

Safe words are often ignored and, moreover, the safe word system itself places the responsibility of revoking consent on the submissive, who may not be in an emotional/psychological state to protect themselves.

This article [3] found BDSM submissive were more likely to have an anxious-avoidant attachment style (which is a type of unhealthy attachment style). However, they also found no significant relationship between BDSM involvement and childhood trauma.

This article [4] found 25.56% of "kink practitioners" reported "consent violations in the kink context".

I found some articles that discuss the idea that BDSM could be used as a type of trauma therapy. Rather tellingly, however, these weren't accompanied by any actual data.

All in all, there is insufficient research on this topic. The research I've presented here suggests that sexual violence is common in BDSM, that BDSM - in many ways - cannot be reliably distinguished from abuse, and that many submissive practitioners are at a disadvantage both inside the relationship and in a larger cultural context.

Beyond that, traumatic backgrounds doesn't appear to be more common in BDSM relationships, so the implication that practitioners are commonly using it as a type of therapy is erroneous.

If I find or see any other research on this topic, I'll add it!

References below the cut:

Masterson, Jessica. The Ethics of Kink. 2023. University of Birmingham, d_ph. etheses.bham.ac.uk, https://etheses.bham.ac.uk/id/eprint/14335/.

Herring, J. (2022), "Coercive Control and Rough Sex", Bows, H. and Herring, J.(Ed.) ‘Rough Sex’ and the Criminal Law: Global Perspectives (Feminist Developments in Violence and Abuse), Emerald Publishing Limited, Leeds, pp. 31-51. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80117-928-720221003

Ten Brink, S., et al. “The Psychology of Kink: A Survey Study into the Relationships of Trauma and Attachment Style with BDSM Interests.” Sexuality Research and Social Policy, vol. 18, no. 1, Mar. 2021, pp. 1–12. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-020-00438-w.

Bowling, Jessamyn, et al. “Disclosing and Reporting of Consent Violations Among Kink Practitioners in the United States.” Violence Against Women, vol. 30, no. 6–7, May 2024, pp. 1453–76. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.1177/10778012221145299.

[religion-is-a-mental-illness]

By: Jesse Singal

Published: Dec 23, 2023

I’ve written many Singal-Minded posts highlighting deficiencies in both left-of-center journalism and peer-reviewed literature on the use of puberty blockers and hormones as a treatment for gender dysphoria (also known as youth gender medicine). 

Each case of lackluster journalism or science is different, but the most common theme is omission. Peer-reviewed articles on this subject regularly omit key information about their data (such as this very important federally funded paper in which multiple important variables simply disappear) and fail to explain very basic facts like why dropout rates were so high or why some kids in a sample went on youth gender medicine and others didn’t, while articles and segments produced for popular audiences by both journalists and academics in this space routinely ignore the fact that a number of countries in Europe have found, via systematic evidence reviews, that the evidence base for youth gender medicine is lacking. 

Pediatrics just published a “Perspectives” article on youth gender medicine (an opinion piece, more or less) by Emily Georges, Emily C.B. Brown, and Rachel Silliman Cohen that is one of the worst offenders I’ve come across. Despite clocking in at a brisk two-and-a-half pages, not counting endnotes and a “Ways to Advocate for TGD [transgender and gender diverse youth] Youth” chart that takes up a whole page of its own, the article contains a remarkable amount of misleading information, including a disheartening number of claims that point, via endnote, to resources that don’t come close to supporting them. The fact that Pediatrics would publish this article in its current form — and I’m getting déjà vu typing these sorts of sentences over and over and over — is a really bad sign about the collapse of institutional credibility in this area. 

Now, Georges and her coauthors are clearly concerned with overly draconian reactions to the youth gender medicine controversy, some of which go as far as attempting to remove trans children from their parents’ home. But these are separate questions from whether the evidence base for youth gender medicine is good. It can both be true that all those European countries are correct that the evidence base is shoddy and that banning the treatments outright (which has not been the response in Europe) is the wrong reaction to this medical uncertainty.

Naturally, the authors don’t mention the highest quality evidence in question, which is — say it with me — the European evidence reviews. It is, and again I feel that déjà vu coming on, a shocking omission on the part of doctors writing in perhaps the most important journal of pediatrics in the world.

Let’s get into a few examples of how misleading this paper is, because so many of the specific claims are questionable at best and clearly false at worst. For example, Georges and her colleagues argue that GOP laws seeking to restrict access to youth gender medicine “deny children access to routine health care that has been shown to decrease dramatically high rates of suicide and depression for TGD youth.” There are two footnotes at the end of the sentence.

This sentence contains two claims: one is that TGD youth have “dramatically high rates of suicide and depression.” You see this claim constantly: transgender youth have terrifying rates of completed suicide, and youth gender medicine can protect them from it. I don’t want to reiterate the argument I’ve already made that transgender youth do not, in fact, appear to have a terrifying rate of completed suicide, so click that link and search down to “The article then notes” if you’re curious about that.

As for the claim that youth gender medicine constitutes “routine health care that has been shown to decrease” these symptoms, the first citation points to the WPATH Standards of Care Version 8. This is a big document, and it’s usually a sign of less-than-tight reasoning when an academic makes a strong causal claim and then asks you to pore through a big document to find the justification for that claim. Here and there the WPATH SoC does contain claims about the supposedly salutary effects of blockers and hormones on youth gender medicine, but these claims generally reference papers like Jack Turban and his colleagues’ 2020 analysis of the 2015 United States Transgender Survey — papers that are extremely weak, methodologically speaking (click here and search down for “mental and social health” to read more about Turban’s 2020 study). But the SoC also notes that “Despite the slowly growing body of evidence supporting the effectiveness of early medical intervention, the number of studies is still low, and there are few outcome studies that follow youth into adulthood. Therefore, a systematic review regarding outcomes of treatment in adolescents is not possible.” Methodologists disagree with this — you can still do a systematic review if there aren’t a lot of studies. But either way, if according to the WPATH SoC there aren’t enough studies to do a proper review, how can the WPATH SoC support the claim that youth gender medicine has been “shown to decrease” depression and anxiety?

The second citation points to Jason Rafferty’s policy statement for the American Academy of Pediatrics, which is a very strange document that certainly does not provide evidence that youth gender medicine has been “shown to decrease” depression and anxiety.

A bit later Georges and her coauthors write, “Although some individuals make it seem that GAC [gender-affirming care] is a new, experimental area of medicine, GAC is evidence-based.” Here there is some slippage between youth gender medicine and gender medicine more generally. Whether or not that’s intentional, it’s a serious stretch — arguably a misleading one — to call this area of medicine “evidence-based.” While definitions of that term can vary, we already know what the Europeans found about youth gender medicine, and a systematic review of adult care commissioned by WPATH itself found that, well, let me borrow from myself, writing in UnHerd:

The results, published in the Journal of the Endocrine Society in 2021, revealed that there is almost no high-quality evidence in this field of medicine. After they summarised every study they could find that met certain quality criteria, and applied Cochrane guidelines to evaluate their quality, the authors could find only low-strength evidence to support the idea that hormones improve quality of life, depression, and anxiety for trans people. Low means, here, that the authors “have limited confidence that the estimate of effect lies close to the true effect for this outcome. The body of evidence has major or numerous deficiencies (or both).” Meanwhile, there wasn’t enough evidence to render any verdict on the quality of the evidence supporting the idea that hormones reduce the risk of death by suicide, which is an exceptionally common claim.

Right after that, the authors explain that “When indicated, TGD youth may start gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogs, which have been used in pediatrics since the 1980s. They also may go on to receive gender-affirming hormones or surgical interventions, all of which are supported by a wealth of research on their safety and effectiveness.” First, “used in pediatrics since the 1980s” is exceptionally misleading, because the context there was (generally) precocious puberty, meaning that after the kids ceased blockers their natal puberty (presumably) kicked in, whereas research shows that the vast majority of kids who go on puberty blockers to treat gender dysphoria subsequently proceed to cross-sex hormones. That’s a very different use case, and one for which we have almost no high-quality evidence, so the “decades of use” argument really is a canard. Second, there is no footnote on “wealth of research on their safety and effectiveness,” which makes sense given that there isn’t a wealth of research on their safety and effectiveness in a youth gender medicine context.

Later, the authors write that youth gender medicine “decreases many negative health outcomes, including rates of depression, and improves well-being for children and adolescents.” The footnote points to this letter Texas Governor Greg Abbott wrote to another state official attempting to institute a policy of investigating instances of youth gender medicine performed in that state. This is clearly an error on the part of the authors, who definitely didn’t mean to cite this here. Next sentence: “GAC has not been shown to lead to short- or long-term negative health effects, and in fact, the benefits of GAC have been shown to far outweigh the risks.” Another strong claim, and this time the footnote points back to the SoC 8. I do not believe that document contains any language stating, conclusively, that all gender medicine is this safe and has such a lopsided benefit:risk ratio, but I could potentially be wrong. Either way, again, if someone makes a strong claim and then asks you to find the evidence for it in a haystack of a document, you should be skeptical.

A bit later on, the authors argue that youth gender medicine is not “medical child abuse,” as some conservatives have argued. I agree: for myriad reasons, that’s a really extreme claim, and the sort of overheated language that doesn’t really help get this conversation back on track. 

But again, the specifics of the authors’ argument are quite strange and ill-founded:

GAC is not MCA. Although caregivers are vital supports in a child’s gender journey, the provision of gender-affirming medical and surgical care necessitates an alignment of the child’s goals with the evidence-based treatment plan determined most appropriate by the medical team. As a testament to GAC being patient driven, studies have found that the vast majority of youth who initiated medication intervention continue these treatments when followed in adulthood.

Setting aside how odd it is to see “child’s goals” used so breezily in this context, let’s once again check the footnote. It points to this study out of the Netherlands, which indeed showed a high continuation rate. But under that protocol — and this is very well-known to anyone who studies this issue — youth seeking blockers or hormones could be excluded for a wide variety of reasons, including mental health comorbidities, insufficiently severe symptoms, unsupportive parents, and so on. It’s really not “patient driven.” This is a misdemeanor compared to some of the misleading statements and miscitations in this paper, but it’s another sign of sloppiness and what might be genuine unfamiliarity with the contours of this debate on the part of the authors.

A bit later on the authors repeat that “The benefits of GAC, most notably on mental health,

self-esteem, and development, outweigh the risks in the majority of circumstances.” No footnote at all this time, although I guess, to be fair, we’ve already been told to read the 260-page SoC to find out where this claim is supported. Then an even stronger claim: “GAC is, for many, lifesaving.” No citation. This is the top journal Pediatrics! How can such a claim be allowed with no evidence?

This next part tips over from sloppy into genuine medical misinformation:

Research highlights how transgender youth disproportionately experience negative mental health outcomes, including anxiety, depression, and suicidality.12 However, when children are supported in their gender identities and have access to GAC, they have better mental health outcomes.12,13 Some studies demonstrate that appropriate GAC, in the context of caregiver support, entirely mitigates the increased risk of depression and suicidal ideation for TGD youth.12

Footnote 12 points to “Baseline Physiologic and Psychosocial Characteristics of Transgender Youth Seeking Care for Gender Dysphoria,” a paper published by Joanna Olson (now Olson-Kennedy) and her colleagues in 2015. As the title suggests, it simply captures the baseline characteristics of kids who showed up to their clinic. Therefore, it definitionally can’t tell us that “when children are supported in their gender identities and have access to GAC, they have better mental health outcomes,” and it definitely can’t tell us that “appropriate GAC, in the context of caregiver support, entirely mitigates the increased risk of depression and suicidal ideation for TGD youth.” The authors have severe problems getting their citations straight throughout the paper, but this is a particularly galling instance because this miscitation communicates such a strong claim about adolescent suicide.

Footnote 13 points to Diana Tordoff and her colleagues’ 2022 study of outcomes at the Seattle Children’s Hospital gender clinic, which readers of this newsletter might remember because I wrote about it twice.

Tordoff and her colleagues at the clinic and the University of Washington–Seattle (Seattle Children’s is the teaching hospital of the UW School of Medicine’s pediatrics department) watched as a group of kids at their clinic were given blockers and/or hormones and showed no meaningful mental health improvement over the course of a year. Then, by torturing various statistics so severely it’s a miracle they weren’t dragged to The Hague, they published a study basically claiming the opposite. It was one of the more noteworthy examples of genuinely pernicious medical misinformation being published by youth gender medicine clinicians in recent years — a complete breakdown of the important barrier between researcher and activist. You can read my posts for more details, but the fact that a doctor at Seattle Children’s Hospital, Emily Georges, would lead-author a Pediatrics Perspectives piece that treats this research as solid evidence represents a serious mortgaging of trust on her and the institution’s part. It’s 2023. She must be aware of the critiques of this study and how little evidence it provides for the efficacy of youth gender medicine. 

This is not going to be an exhausting look at every claim in this piece. But I’ll leave you with one last example of how sloppy it all is:

Denying GAC not only represents medical neglect, but it is also state-sanctioned emotional abuse. In addition to the basic physical needs all people require for survival, humans have vital psychological needs. The degree to which these needs are met during childhood impact a child’s identity, capacities, and behaviors into adulthood.14 Emotional abuse involves actions, either as a repeated pattern or an extreme single incident, that thwart a child’s basic psychological needs.14 This form of abuse can be especially damaging because it undermines a child’s self-worth and psychological development.14 Policies that prohibit or limit a caregiver or physician’s ability to provide necessary GAC force caregivers and providers to perpetuate psychological distress.

The footnote points to a study that does not mention the word child or its variants, and which has nothing to do with the matter under discussion. The authors didn’t even give their paper a rudimentary proofreading to ensure the footnotes were correct before publishing it.

Of course, it isn’t just their fault. It would be quite easy for Pediatrics not to publish a Perspective this wildly off-base and disconnected from the real-world debate over youth gender medicine. It would be similarly easy for Pediatrics to insist on the rudimentary proofreading of citations. Pediatrics chose not to take these steps. This is a pattern.

[tombuckreviews]

The Judo Argument book review

Debates about whether God exists have raged for ages and probably always will. Such arguments typically play out in philosophy and theology. However, some reason from a scientific perspective - employing findings about the natural world to argue for divine origins. These "judo arguments” attempt to beat science at its own game, citing laws and evidence to make a faith-based case. While novel, they universally come up short when scrutinized scientifically.

A common argument notes that complex life could not have evolved randomly, as entropy dictates decay toward disorder. Thus, intentional intelligent design must be involved. However, Earth isn’t a closed system – the Sun provides ample energy for local organizing processes to emerge so long as net universal entropy increases. Another argues that amino acids forming the first proteins randomly would be astronomically unlikely. However, while a precise protein repeating by chance is unlikely, some self-replicating molecule arising eventually becomes probable - and selection could amplify it.

The Ontological Argument: Defining God Into Being One of the earliest scientific arguments for God's existence is the "ontological argument" put forward by St. Anselm in 1078. His reasoning goes that the very concept of a perfect being implies its existence since non-existence would be an imperfection. This argument attempts to define God into existence through logic, without the need for evidence. While inventive for its time, modern philosophers largely reject it as unsupported semantic trickery. As sci-fi author Asimov notes with humor in his essay titled “The Judo Argument,” conceiving even a “perfect gas” does not necessitate its physical existence in reality.

Thermodynamics and the Improbability of Order A more common judo argument invokes the second law of thermodynamics, which holds that entropy or disorder universally tends to increase in closed systems. The case goes that evolution's drive towards greater order and complexity over billions of years appears to violate this. Thus, intentional intelligent design must be involved to circumvent random decay. However, Asimov adeptly counters that Earth isn’t a closed system – the Sun provides ample incoming energy to facilitate local organizing processes so long as net entropy increases in the larger solar system. Just as a refrigerator can stay cold inside by releasing more heat to its surroundings, life can self-organize additional order so long as there is an external energy gradient to exploit.

Probability Calculations and the Origins of Life In his 1947 book "Human Destiny," French biophysicist Pierre Lecomte du Noüy calculates the absurdly low probability that the amino acid chains forming the first proteins could have been linked by pure chance random interactions within the lifetime of Earth. He presents this tiny probability as persuasive evidence for intentional divine design seeding life. Asimov admits the odds of randomly hitting on an exact known protein are infinitesimal. However, his rebuttal shows that while likely amino acid combinations are still insufficient to spark replication, some variability remains probable. Thus, once any self-copying molecule like RNA eventually forms by chance, mutation, and selection can take over to bridge the gap from chemistry to evolutionary biology. This incremental bootstrapping pathway is now supported by decades of origin of life experiments, rather than necessitating one impossibly unlikely jackpot molecule.

Order Emerging Spontaneously from Chaos While Asimov stops short of any definitive statements on God’s existence either way, his systematic take-downs of such arguments rooted in shaky logic demonstrate the awesome power of emergent order possible from chaotic physical and chemical laws alone. Contrary to Creationist doctrine, complexity does not imply an intelligent Creator. In Asimov’s model grounded by evidence, life proliferates not despite, but precisely because of, the organizational trends intrinsic to dynamic non-equilibrium thermodynamic systems with sufficient energy flows. Those seeking an honest assessment of how far science can go in engaging with faith will find “The Judo Argument” a thought-provoking and enlightening read. More broadly, it highlights the wonder, chance, and self-organization built into nature that allowed humankind to eventually emerge and ponder such eternal questions - no deities required.

The March of Science Towards Natural Explanations Over the centuries, phenomena once cited definitively as proof of divine influence - from lightning to human origins to disease treatment - have consistently yielded to natural scientific explanations rather than legitimizing supernatural ones. While gaps remain in our knowledge, the march towards material and empirical causes continues unabated. Those hoping science will reach its limits and endorse intentional explanations are invariably disappointed. Today mysteries like consciousness, dark matter, and the spark of life draw those seeking transcendence for what science has yet to explain. But theories are already emerging of these grounded in complex feedback loops, exotic particles, and energetic chemistry alone, without any need for external souls, creators, or vital energies.

Can Science and Religion Ever Be Reconciled? While judo arguments fail to leverage science to demonstrate the intent behind life’s emergence, the impasse between scientific and spiritual worldviews persists. They operate in separate spheres concerning very different kinds of questions - the mechanical how versus the numinous why. Asimov gives reason for optimism by engaging deeply with the science cited rather than dismissing it outright, respecting religious conviction even while disputing faulty logic. In that spirit of mutual respect for evidence and belief, the relationship between science and philosophy might finally leave behind centuries of tension. Just as interdisciplinary research unifies micro and macro fields, more grace-filled profound dialogues between leading thinkers pursuing different facets of truth may continue to relieve friction and enlighten humankind.

The Judo Argument: Wrestling with Science and Faith In his thought-provoking book "The Judo Argument," author Shoaib Rahman examines several longstanding attempts to use science to definitively prove the existence of God. He dubbed these "judo arguments" - when believers try to flip science's logic against itself to argue for supernatural explanations from a rational perspective.

Order Emerging from Chaos

Many such arguments hinge on the claim that complex structures like the human eye could not have evolved randomly or that the spark of life itself beating the odds is too improbable without guidance. However, as Rahman points out, the second law of thermodynamics only probabilistically favors increased entropy rather than strictly mandating it. With ample external energy sources like the Sun, locally reversing entropy through organizing processes that ultimately enable life is not unlikely over billions of years.

Probability Statistics Misapplied

In perhaps the book's most compelling chapter, Rahman unpacks the fallacies in prominent creationist probability calculations. While authorities cite the infinitesimal chances of proteins or DNA chains forming exactly as they exist today spontaneously, he notes this is the wrong comparison. The first self-replicating molecules would likely be far simpler, adapting later by evolutionary processes. Moreover, while any given outcome is very unlikely, some outcome proving viable is still probable - especially with chemical building blocks already extant.

When Statistics Fail Philosophy

Yet at its heart, Rahmansympathetically explains these arguments stem from cognitive gaps left unsatisfied by reductionist science. Statistical improbabilities argued as necessitating guidance disguise deeper existential grappling. But just as dividing accident from intent may provide comfort, 'God' often inserts higher questions rather than answers. Neither statistics nor semantics can capture the whole of reality. By revealing judo arguments' overreliance on these tools, Rahman shows how they fail philosophy before even reaching faulty science.

A Reasonable Path Forward

While cataloging gaps in past efforts, Rahman notably stops short of conclusively disproving God, remaining open to new evidence. He simply shows the folly of attempting proof, either way, advocating humility. Within those wise constraints, his dismantling of shaky logic sympathetic to the motivations provides a blueprint for more constructive dialogues between science and faith. For non-believers, it unpacks assumptions reflecting existential angst. For believers, it respects faith's convictions while avoiding easily falsifiable scientific extrapolations in tension with theology's teachings.

By showcasing judo arguments' inadequacies with both evidence and meaning, Rahman's "The Judo Argument" charts a reasonable path forward for reconciling the compatibility questions haunting science and religion’s conflicted past. Perhaps their interplay can yet offer mutual illumination of both immanent and transcendent mysteries. But crudely wielding each against the other proves nothing, clarifies little, misses the point entirely, and impoverishes all parties. This book provides helpful guideposts to move that stalled conversation into more enlightened territory.

[seewetter]

"Wow thanks for the quick response! Jeez you’re a fast typer!"

You are a speedy typer yourself. :)

"I’ve been going through your blog, you’re one of the few well informed people I’ve found on this site with actually researched and comprehensive arguments!"

Well, be careful about that, it's at best a relative strength. I can come off as better researched than I am and you should check assertions I make because I have made numerous mistakes over the years. But compliment taken, thanks.

"Honestly I’m not saying anything about being trans, and I genuinely had no knowledge about the previous studies."

Well just as general food for thought, the medical establishment is not in the business of approving treatments that haven't been found to be medically helpful. No matter the topic, no matter the situation, it's a pretty reliable assumption that doctors today aren't mad scientists, gleefully experimenting on their patients. Doesn't make them saints (they can neglect their patients, for example) but if some option is really common, there's pretty much a 100% it is scientifically backed.

This doesn't mean, of course, that doctors always treat illnesses and problems appropriately. There is bogus science. But in the case of transgender-related medicine, this is a field that has been around for 100 years, while the fuss about it has been around since transgender women made it onto the cover of Cosmopolitan magazine in 2014...which indicates that all the concerns that people are voicing have little to do with the medicine and more to do with a sense that society is under siege.

"This isn’t a topic I actively engage with because it gets so heated and toxic and hateful."

It can. Although you can have nice conversations with more people than you'd think! :)

"But I do think it’s interesting that from my perspective, as a person who has had multiple trans friends and is nonbinary myself, that I too was unaware of existing research (to be clear the past tense has nothing to do with them being trans, just my personal issues that caused me to ghost everyone I ever knew except my family). And I think it potentially says a lot about other people who also oppose hormone treatments based on medical concerns. Like me, there are probably a lot of people who just genuinely aren’t informed and are worried."

Oh there certainly are a lot of people who just are out of the loop! That's one of the main reasons I still hang out on this website and repeat myself like a broken record.

I am always trying to get people to read the essay "Escaping the Echo Chamber" though, because I find that there's also a lack of trust that trumps any information you or I or anyone could provide. When people think that the transgender movement is fundamentally sinister or that trans people (including non-binary people) are fundamentally dishonest, then if you provide people with especially useful information or especially good arguments, it backfires, because internally these people are thinking "wow, you sound so persuasive, you're that manipulative!"). And they have these thoughts as part of an emotional state, it's not just their opinion which you could help them self-criticize. So for that reason, it's really important to realize that unless these people realize on their own that they need to learn to trust us as much as they trust their own preferred sources of truth, no argument of any sort will get through to them, no matter how much they enjoy free speech, critical thinking, logic or rationality.

It's also worth mentioning that mainstream media aren't reliably providing accurate information, so the main reason I have good information on topics like this is simply networking-- finding trans people who work at important institutions that monitor medical research or current laws and passing on what they know.

"And it’s not that I think trans kids can’t make their own choices on these things, one of my best friends in grade school transitioned in second grade, and he definitely knew what he needed and made the right choice for himself. It’s about the medical side, the side where doctors were using treatments not designed, studied, or authorized for use in that manner that scared me."

Those are totally rational fears. It's unfortunate that the information on this is hard to find, because that is one reason why perfectly rational people take stances on this issue that end up harming trans kids.

"I’m not a huge fan of drugs or modern medicine despite relying heavily on it for my mental health. I have good reason not to trust American healthcare, from the corruption to the sexual abuse to the incompetence and underfunding and over booked appointments, it’s a lot. I rely on medications and drugs, I’m aware of how much they’ve helped me, but it’s still a struggle to trust foreign substances that alter my body and mind in ways that no one actually understands."

Fingers crossed for anyone suffering in the US right now. I wish I could do more.

When it comes to hormones, there are communities online that discuss consequences both physical and mental that you can expect. I can't give you medical advice, I'm not a doctor so please don't take it that way, but I would assume that you can find similar forums online for a lot of medications/drugs and you can find blogs from people who have a disease and through them you can indirectly learn about things, especially if you want to find more reliable doctors and weed out bad doctors, you might be able to find contacts just through people that report good progress with some medication.

There's a lot that goes into weeding out bad actors online though. There's people that are trying to sell stuff. There's people making promises too good to be true. It's hard to recognize them, especially if you don't know what regular medication does. I think talking to doctors is sometimes the best course of action, even though I can understand how in the US that might be very expensive and risky too. But it is your health, so you may want to look up multiple forums and try to find medicine-related blogs maybe even by medical professionals whom you can shoot a question. That can even be a question of "how do I figure out who to trust" and if you ask lots of blogs that question, you might get better at figuring out how to spot bad health advice.

"Due to both knowledge of the many ways it can go wrong and the way new drugs are developed (throw random compounds and see what sticks)."

Hm. Although there's some really bad medical research (cancer scientists and psychologists, I'm looking at problems in your fields), generally there's a lot of checks and balances in this kind of research. For example, you can see what drugs other countries are approving, especially countries with more strict requirements than the FDA uses. Sometimes that information even pops up when you look up the drug on Wikipedia, other times you can just check whether the drug is approved internationally by checking Wikipedia. Some countries with excellent health care are South Africa, Germany, Sweden and believe it or not Saudi Arabia. So it can make sense to see if medication has been approved in those countries.

"Not to mention the incredibly cult like mindset that the trans community on the internet has developed. I’m not saying being trans is a cult or that trans people are evil and corrupting, but I do think that being trans has been made into something “cool” that kids want to emulate not because they are trans but because they want to be part of that community. And people tend to get overly defensive and insular when they’re being persecuted so I get the defensiveness. I just think it’s turned into a black and white us vs. them mentality that is not productive or helpful to anyone."

Well, I do understand that concern. A few years back, when the ROGD study first came out, I found myself thinking that this was a real phenomenon ("rapid onset gender dysphoria"). If I had had the opportunity to speak publicly on the topic at the time, I probably would have tried to take a somewhat "Centrist" position and caution trans people to take this new research seriously while cautioning people critiqueing the trans community that trans kids do in fact exist and that they need support.

But then I looked at the ROGD study beyond just reading the summary/abstract and I realized that they had simply sampled 300 parents from an anti-transgender website. So all their data was based on the subjective impressions of people who aren't neutral. Since that, I find myself a little more uncertain about arguments saying kids want being trans to be trendy.

I meet lots of trans people, often young and with dyed hair, often wearing bold outfits, but I never get the sense that they think being trans is trendy. They think being out in public is important. They are also worried, because we live in dangerous times to be transgender. A few years ago in Florida, governor De Santis tried to pass two laws: one law declared cross-dressing to be child grooming and pedophilia, the second law was to declare the death penalty for child grooming and pedophilia. Taken together, these laws are attempts at killing all cross-dressers, including cross-dressing children.

Since 2014, being trans can get you positive pop culture attention. It's can also be a big youth culture thing in places like Tumblr or TikTok or YouTube or Twitch. And obviously danger doesn't always stop people from engaging in extreme stunts or life choices.

But this doesn't lead to teenagers and kids wanting to be trans. I would suggest, if this topic does interest you, just paying closer attention to actual spaces where trans people talk about their lives.

"Drug companies are already doing their best to sell us harmful substances that we don’t need, and some verification that it both works and isn’t harmful is a huge relief."

I'm not sure drug companies sell harmful yet unnecessary substances. My sense has been that investment bodies like Goldman Sachs ask questions like "Is curing patients a sustainable business model?" and that companies like Purdue Pharma sold misleading advertisements that caused people to buy painkillers they didn't lead, which caused the current opioid crisis in the US. But I don't really get the sense that people are being sold harmful and unneeded substances. I will confess that because I don't live in the US, I don't know...and also I tend to avoid going to the doctor myself.

But if a medication I was taking seemed harmful, I would ask my doctor for a different medication. You might think that's short sighted, like asking for a different poison. But as far as I can tell, doctors are trained to do the right thing, asked to do the impossible and stuck in a weird situation as the go-betweens between the patients and the creepy medical insurance companies and investors. These doctors have training and expertise and the main horror stories with doctors tend to involve doctors who don't listen to patients or who don't keep up to date on the new research, rather than doctors who want to poison their patients or plot against them. I don't know, I hope that makes sense. It's hard to tell Americans not to go to asshole doctors though, because Americans have a healthcare system where it's hard to switch I think. Wikipedia confirms my suspicion that there's a shortage of family doctors in the US, so that makes it hard to find someone better, I'm sure.

What is nightmarish for me to watch are these kind of fake online doctors, people with medical degrees that are giving advice directly contradicted by people in, say, the World Health Organization. Some scraggly white-haired doctor thinks he knows medicine better than the people that collect all the available information, have all the important ties in the researcher community and don't really have any incentives that would cause them to have a sinister agenda. But unfortunately, the sympathetic guy, the one people can relate to wins out over the un-personal big organization. I have an uncle that went down an entire rabbit hole and convinced himself that certain medication is made by slaughtering babies and putting them in the meat grinder -- and he knows that sounds unreasonable, but he has a university degree and so does the medical doctor he listens to on YouTube. My mother, who works at a science publisher and really knows how to research, spent three whole days figuring out how true or untrue the things were that my uncle was spouting. But my uncle didn't care at that point, because he only trusts this sort of personable information now, he doesn't trust information gathered by the smartest minds on the planet any more, just people who seem like underdogs to him. Or something. I'm not sure I fully understand his thinking.

"And my concerns about menopause are just basic things that my mom and aunts complain about. The sometimes months or years of imbalanced hormones that cause mental or emotional turmoil, decreased bone density leading to more severe injuries, that kind of thing. Hormones are what run our bodies more than anything else, they signal growth and mood and such. They’re temperamental, as anyone with severe pms will tell you. Not to mention chemical imbalances are a big cause of mental illness. There’s just so much we don’t know about our bodies."

Well, hormones will definitely make you temperamental, it's a second puberty if you choose to take them as an adult.

But I think it's worth noting that the trans community (like the medical advice community) isn't really a community. Like...there are lots of separate communities, all with their own ideas. Some of those communities are cult-like, but usually the communities that are purely focused on giving you data about how to take hormones and about the risks tend to be pretty matter-of-factly, with no moral crusading, black-white thinking or peddling fanciful ideas. And if you are trying to see what the risks would be those are good places to seek out, because you can find people discussing negative and positive personal experiences there.

Like: this is a serious topic. There can be / have been serious consequences from using hormones, though it's rare. It makes sense to get lots of advice from independent places. Good luck, if that's what you're up to.

Two years after being tasked with commissioning a review of medical evidence surrounding gender-affirming care for trans youth, Utah’s own state health department has concluded that trans healthcare bans “cannot be justified.” The Republicans who commissioned the study aren’t too happy about it.

Back in 2023, Utah Governor Spencer Cox signed a bill that placed an indefinite “moratorium” on doctors prescribing gender-affirming care like hormone therapy and puberty blockers to trans youth. That bill ordered the Utah Department of Health and Human Services to compile their report in order to produce recommendations for the state government on whether or not to lift the moratorium.

This week, the department delivered their long-awaited, over 1,000-page report — which is dated August 6, 2024 — to Utah lawmakers. The report’s authors found that “the consensus of the evidence supports that the treatments are effective in terms of mental health, psychosocial outcomes, and the induction of body changes consistent with the affirmed gender in pediatric GD [gender dysphoria] patients.”

The authors added that “the evidence also supports that the treatments are safe in terms of changes to bone density, cardiovascular risk factors, metabolic changes, and cancer.” Trans youth who had received gender-affirming care were within the bounds of normal, non-pathological ranges for these conditions.

y’all this is huge. please don’t “water is wet” all over it! I understand that we all already know this… The point is that the world doesn’t know or care or believe and so these studies really fucking matter!

[mcginnlawfirm]

How Does a Criminal Defense Attorney Handle Felony Charges?

Facing felony charges can be overwhelming. You might feel lost, anxious, or uncertain about the next steps. This is where a skilled criminal defense attorney can step in and provide guidance. If you've been charged with a felony, understanding how an attorney navigates the complexities of the legal system can empower you to make informed decisions.

Criminal Defense Attorney: Your Legal Ally

When you find yourself facing felony charges, the first thing you should do is seek the expertise of a criminal defense attorney. This legal professional is more than just a guide; they are your advocate. Their primary goal is to ensure you receive a fair trial and protect your rights.

The journey often begins with an initial consultation. During this meeting, your attorney will listen to your side of the story, gather details about your case's circumstances, and provide an overview of the legal process. This step is essential for building a strong defense strategy.

A reputable firm, like McGinn Law Firm, will take the time to understand your background and the specifics of your case. This personalized approach helps them tailor their defense strategy to your situation.

Building a Defense Strategy

Once your attorney has gathered enough information, they will build a defense strategy. This involves analyzing evidence, including police reports, witness statements, and any available video footage. They will also assess the prosecution's case, looking for weaknesses or inconsistencies.

Your attorney may employ various defense strategies based on the details of your case. Some common approaches include:

Challenging Evidence: If the evidence against you was obtained unlawfully or unreliable, your attorney can argue to dismiss it.

Alibi Defense: If you prove that you were somewhere else during the alleged crime, this can establish reasonable doubt.

Reduced Charges: In some cases, your attorney may negotiate with the prosecution to reduce the severity of the charges.

Plea Bargains: If appropriate, your attorney might advise you to consider a plea deal that could result in a lighter sentence.

Engaging with the Prosecution

Negotiating with the prosecution is often a key part of handling felony charges. A good criminal defense attorney will use their experience to engage in meaningful discussions with the prosecutor. This could involve negotiating a plea deal or advocating for alternative sentencing options.

The skillful negotiation of an attorney can make a significant difference in the outcome of your case. They aim to achieve the best possible result for you, whether that means fighting for your innocence in court or working toward a favorable plea agreement.

Trial Preparation

If your case goes to trial, your attorney will prepare diligently. This includes organizing evidence, preparing witnesses, and formulating persuasive arguments. A defense attorney will also anticipate the prosecution's strategies, ensuring they are ready to counter any arguments presented against you.

Simultaneously, your attorney will keep you informed and involved in the process. You must understand what to expect during the trial and your rights and options.

Representation in Court

Your defense attorney will represent you before a judge and jury during the trial. They will present evidence, question witnesses, and make closing arguments on your behalf. They aim to create a compelling narrative highlighting your innocence or reducing your ability.

Your attorney’s performance in court can significantly sway the jury’s perspective. Having an experienced criminal defense attorney at your side can help ensure that every aspect of your case is presented in the best light possible.

Post-Trial Actions

After the trial concludes, your attorney will guide you through any subsequent steps. They can assist you with appeals if the verdict is unfavorable. The legal process does not end with the trial; having someone knowledgeable to navigate this can be invaluable.

Importance of Choosing the Right Attorney

Choosing the right criminal defense attorney can feel overwhelming, but it’s important. You want someone experienced, understanding, and genuinely invested in your case. At McGinn Law Firm, we pride ourselves on providing personalized attention and strategic advice tailored to your situation.

Take the First Step Today

If you’re facing felony charges, don’t navigate this challenging journey alone. At McGinn Law Firm, we are dedicated to providing skilled legal representation to protect your rights and future.

Call our Criminal Defense Attorney at 712-328-1566 for your free initial consultation. Together, we can work towards the best possible outcome for your case.

[maliahbun]

Appeals

As you navigate the intricate world of legal proceedings, you might not be aware of the complex dance of strategies and nuances that define the world of appeals. From the meticulous crafting of appellate briefs to the art of persuasive oral arguments, every step in the process holds the potential to sway the outcome of your case. But did you know that there's a lesser-known aspect that can greatly impact the success of your appeal? Stay tuned to uncover this critical element that could be the key to achieving a favorable verdict in the appellate courts.

Key Takeaways

Understanding harmless error is crucial for appeal success.

Proper preservation of issues essential for appellate review.

Steps from notice of appeal to court of appeals.

Importance of accurate transcript and demonstrating prejudice.

Filing petition for writ of certiorari for Supreme Court review.

Understanding the Appeals Process

To navigate the intricate legal landscape of appeals effectively, you must have a thorough understanding of the appeals process as outlined in the Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure and the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure. When considering an appeal, it is important to comprehend the steps involved in moving a case from the district court to the court of appeals in Utah.

Piercing the Corporate Veil

One key aspect to grasp is the concept of harmless error. According to Rule 11 of the Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure, harmless error occurs when an error, defect, irregularity, or variance does not affect substantial rights. Understanding what constitutes harmless error can impact the success of an appeal significantly.

Another essential element is the preservation of issues for appeal. Rule 24 of the Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure emphasizes the importance of raising objections, making motions, or presenting arguments in the trial court to make sure that issues are preserved for appellate review. Failure to preserve issues properly may result in those issues being waived on appeal.

Grounds for Filing an Appeal

Grounds for filing an appeal encompass a range of legal bases on which a party may seek review of a lower court's decision in Utah. When contemplating whether to file an appeal, it is important to understand the specific grounds that justify such action. Here are some key points to keep in mind:

Notice of Appeal: One of the initial steps in filing an appeal is submitting a formal notice of appeal to the appropriate court, as per Rule 3 of the Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Transcript: Ensuring an accurate record of the proceedings is crucial. Rule 11 of the Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure outlines the requirements for preparing the transcript for the appellate court.

Prejudice: Demonstrating that the lower court's decision was prejudicial and had a significant impact on the outcome of the case is a common ground for filing an appeal.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari: If seeking review by the Utah Supreme Court, filing a petition for a writ of certiorari is necessary to request the court's review of the lower court's decision.

Legal Errors: Identifying legal errors, such as misapplication of the law or procedural errors, can also form the basis for an appeal. It is essential to cite specific rules or statutes that were allegedly misinterpreted or overlooked.

Understanding these grounds is essential when contemplating whether to pursue an appeal in Utah.

Preparing for Appellate Review

When considering preparing for appellate review in Utah, it is essential to meticulously adhere to the procedural requirements outlined in the Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure and the Utah Code. Appellate review involves a higher court reviewing a lower court's decision to determine if any errors were made. The appellate court conducts a de novo review of the case, meaning it looks at the case with a fresh perspective and does not give deference to the lower court's judgment.

To initiate the appellate process, the party seeking review must file a notice of appeal within the specified timeframe as per Rule 3 of the Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure. Subsequently, the appellant must file a docketing statement, as required by Rule 4, to provide essential case information to the appellate court.

Moreover, preparing persuasive appellate briefs is vital. An appellant's brief must present arguments supported by legal authority and facts to convince the appellate court to reverse the lower court's decision. Conversely, the appellee's brief aims to uphold the lower court's judgment by demonstrating why it was correctly decided. Each brief must adhere to the formatting and content requirements outlined in Rule 24 of the Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure.

The Role of Oral Arguments

Oral arguments play an essential role in the appellate process, providing an opportunity for litigants to present their case directly to the appellate court. During oral arguments, you have the chance to address the judges, clarify legal points, and counter any questions they may have. Here are five key aspects of the role of oral arguments in the appellate process:

Clarification: Oral arguments allow you to elucidate complex legal issues or nuances that may not have been fully understood from the written briefs alone.

Persuasion: It is your opportunity to convincingly argue your position, highlighting key facts and legal principles to sway the judges in your favor.

Question Answering: The judges may have specific questions they want you to address, and oral arguments give you the chance to directly respond to these queries.

Rebuttal: You can use oral arguments to counter points made by the opposing party, strengthening your own position and undermining theirs.

Time Limit: Be mindful of the time constraints set by the Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure; effective time management during oral arguments is crucial to ensure you cover all essential points.

In both civil appeals and administrative agency appeals, the oral arguments stage is a critical juncture in the appellate process, where your advocacy skills and legal knowledge are put to the test.

Potential Outcomes of Appeals

Upon review of the appellate process, the potential outcomes of appeals are varied and can greatly impact the final resolution of a case. When it comes to a juvenile court appeal, the ruling can be affirmed, reversed, or remanded for further proceedings. In criminal appeals, the appellate court may uphold the conviction, order a new trial, or even dismiss the case entirely based on legal errors. In small claims appeals, the decision could be upheld, modified, or reversed based on the facts presented.

Understanding the rules governing appeals is important in anticipating potential outcomes. The Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure outline the procedures for appealing a decision from the district court, juvenile court, or other lower courts. These rules provide a framework for how appeals are conducted, the deadlines for filing appeals, and the requirements for presenting arguments before the appellate court.

In the domain of civil procedure, the Utah Code also sets forth specific guidelines for appealing decisions in various types of cases. Whether it's a juvenile court appeal, criminal appeal, or small claims appeal, following the established rules is essential to achieving a favorable outcome. By adhering to these rules and presenting a compelling case on appeal, you can increase the likelihood of a successful resolution to your legal matter.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I Appeal a Small Claims Court Decision?

So, you've just received a decision from small claims court that you're not thrilled about. Wondering if you can appeal? Let's delve into and explore the process and options available to you.

How Long Do I Have to File an Appeal?

You have 30 days from the date of the final judgment to file an appeal in Utah. Make sure to adhere to this timeline as missing it can result in losing your right to appeal.

What Happens if the Appellate Court Disagrees With the Lower Court's Decision?

If the appellate court disagrees with the lower court's decision, it can overturn the ruling, modify it, or send it back for further consideration. Understanding the reasons for the disagreement is vital for your case.

Is It Possible to Appeal a Default Judgment?

If you miss responding to a lawsuit, the court may enter a default judgment against you. Appealing a default judgment can be complex, but it is possible under certain circumstances. Legal advice is essential.

Can I Represent Myself in an Appellate Court?

Yes, you can represent yourself in an appellate court. It is important to thoroughly understand the rules, procedures, and deadlines in appellate practice. Consider seeking guidance or legal advice to navigate the complexities effectively.

Areas We Serve in Utah

We serve individuals and businesses in the following Utah locations:

Salt Lake City Utah West Valley City Utah Provo Utah West Jordan Utah Orem Utah Sandy Utah Ogden Utah St. George Utah Layton Utah South Jordan Utah Lehi Utah Millcreek Utah Taylorsville Utah Logan Utah Murray Utah Draper Utah Bountiful Utah Riverton Utah Herriman Utah Spanish Fork Utah Roy Utah Pleasant Grove Utah Kearns Utah Tooele Utah Cottonwood Heights Utah Midvale Utah Springville Utah Eagle Mountain Utah Cedar City Utah Kaysville Utah Clearfield Utah Holladay Utah American Fork Utah Syracuse Utah Saratoga Springs Utah Magna Utah Washington Utah South Salt Lake Utah Farmington Utah Clinton Utah North Salt Lake Utah Payson Utah North Ogden Utah Brigham City Utah Highland Utah Centerville Utah Hurricane Utah South Ogden Utah Heber Utah West Haven Utah Bluffdale Utah Santaquin Utah Smithfield Utah Woods Cross Utah Grantsville Utah Lindon Utah North Logan Utah West Point Utah Vernal Utah Alpine Utah Cedar Hills Utah Pleasant View Utah Mapleton Utah Stansbury Par Utah Washington Terrace Utah Riverdale Utah Hooper Utah Tremonton Utah Ivins Utah Park City Utah Price Utah Hyrum Utah Summit Park Utah Salem Utah Richfield Utah Santa Clara Utah Providence Utah South Weber Utah Vineyard Utah Ephraim Utah Roosevelt Utah Farr West Utah Plain City Utah Nibley Utah Enoch Utah Harrisville Utah Snyderville Utah Fruit Heights Utah Nephi Utah White City Utah West Bountiful Utah Sunset Utah Moab Utah Midway Utah Perry Utah Kanab Utah Hyde Park Utah Silver Summit Utah La Verkin Utah Morgan Utah

Utah Appeals Lawyer Consultation

When you need help from a Utah appeals lawyer, call Jeremy D. Eveland, MBA, JD (801) 613-1472 for a consultation.

Jeremy Eveland 17 North State Street Lindon UT 84042 (801) 613-1472

Home

Related Posts

What Is A Conflict Of Interest For A Lawyer?

Business Lawyer Clinton Utah

Understanding Utah’s Labor Laws

Business Lawyer North Salt Lake Utah

Product Liability Laws in Utah

Business Lawyer Payson Utah

Preventing Cybersecurity Breaches

Business Lawyer North Ogden Utah

Shareholder Agreements in Utah

Business Lawyer Hurricane Utah

Tax Status and LLC Types

Corporate Attorney West Jordan UT

Estate Planning For Survivorship Considerations

Estate Plan Update

Construction Lawyer West Bountiful Utah

Estate Planning for Business Asset Protection

Estate Planning for Children

Are Small Business Loans Worth It?

Business Succession Planning Lawyer

Alimony Lawyer

Business Lawyer for LLC

Attorneys in Utah

Read more here https://jeremyeveland.com/appeals/

[divorcelawyerscanada]

The Role of a Divorce Lawyer in Toronto: Why You Need One

Going through a divorce is one of the most emotionally and legally complex experiences many people face. While it may be tempting to handle the process on your own, having an experienced divorce lawyer by your side can make a significant difference. In Toronto, divorce lawyers play a crucial role in ensuring your rights are protected, guiding you through the legal system, and helping you achieve a fair resolution. Here’s why hiring a divorce lawyer is essential.

1. Expert Guidance Through the Legal Process

Divorce involves navigating a web of legal requirements, including filing documents, meeting deadlines, and understanding family law in Ontario. A divorce lawyer ensures that you:

Understand your rights and obligations.

File all necessary paperwork correctly and on time.

Avoid common legal pitfalls that could delay or complicate your case.

Their expertise is particularly valuable in Toronto, where the family court system can be complex and challenging to navigate without professional help.

2. Objective Advice During Emotional Times

Divorce is often accompanied by intense emotions, which can cloud judgment and lead to impulsive decisions. A divorce lawyer provides an objective perspective, helping you:

Stay focused on your long-term goals.

Avoid making emotional decisions that could negatively impact your case.

Prioritize issues that matter most, such as child custody or financial stability.

3. Protecting Your Rights and Interests

One of the primary roles of a divorce lawyer is to advocate for your best interests. Whether it’s negotiating a settlement or representing you in court, they ensure that:

You receive a fair division of assets and debts.

Child custody and support arrangements align with your preferences and the best interests of your children.

Spousal support is calculated accurately based on your financial situation.

4. Efficient Conflict Resolution

Divorces can become contentious, especially when spouses disagree on key issues. A skilled divorce lawyer can:

Act as a mediator to facilitate productive negotiations.

Reduce conflict by handling communication with your ex-spouse or their lawyer.

Propose creative solutions that satisfy both parties and avoid prolonged disputes.

5. Court Representation When Necessary

While many divorces in Toronto are resolved through negotiation or mediation, some cases require court intervention. If your case goes to court, a divorce lawyer:

Represents you effectively, presenting evidence and arguments in your favor.

Understands court procedures and ensures compliance with legal standards.

Advocates for you to achieve the best possible outcome.

6. Handling Complex Financial Matters

High-net-worth divorces or cases involving significant assets can be particularly complex. A divorce lawyer can:

Work with financial experts to accurately value assets, including properties, investments, and pensions.

Identify hidden assets or financial discrepancies.

Ensure a fair distribution of marital property.

7. Customized Legal Strategies

Every divorce is unique, and a one-size-fits-all approach rarely works. A divorce lawyer develops a personalized strategy tailored to your specific circumstances, whether it involves:

Protecting business interests.

Addressing international custody disputes.

Managing spousal support modifications post-divorce.

When Should You Hire a Divorce Lawyer?

While some couples pursue an uncontested divorce and settle issues amicably, hiring a lawyer is advisable if:

There are disagreements about child custody, support, or property division.

You suspect financial dishonesty from your spouse.

You’re unfamiliar with Ontario’s family laws.

The divorce involves significant assets or debts.

Conclusion

The role of a divorce lawyer in Toronto extends far beyond paperwork and legal jargon. They are your advocate, negotiator, and guide through one of life’s most challenging transitions. By hiring a skilled divorce lawyer, you ensure that your rights are protected, conflicts are minimized, and you achieve the best possible outcome for your future. If you’re facing a divorce, don’t hesitate to seek the support of a knowledgeable Toronto divorce lawyer to navigate the journey with confidence and clarity.

[k-adriana]

Appeals

As you navigate the intricate world of legal proceedings, you might not be aware of the complex dance of strategies and nuances that define the world of appeals. From the meticulous crafting of appellate briefs to the art of persuasive oral arguments, every step in the process holds the potential to sway the outcome of your case. But did you know that there's a lesser-known aspect that can greatly impact the success of your appeal? Stay tuned to uncover this critical element that could be the key to achieving a favorable verdict in the appellate courts.

Key Takeaways

Understanding harmless error is crucial for appeal success.

Proper preservation of issues essential for appellate review.

Steps from notice of appeal to court of appeals.

Importance of accurate transcript and demonstrating prejudice.

Filing petition for writ of certiorari for Supreme Court review.

Understanding the Appeals Process

To navigate the intricate legal landscape of appeals effectively, you must have a thorough understanding of the appeals process as outlined in the Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure and the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure. When considering an appeal, it is important to comprehend the steps involved in moving a case from the district court to the court of appeals in Utah.

Piercing the Corporate Veil

One key aspect to grasp is the concept of harmless error. According to Rule 11 of the Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure, harmless error occurs when an error, defect, irregularity, or variance does not affect substantial rights. Understanding what constitutes harmless error can impact the success of an appeal significantly.

Another essential element is the preservation of issues for appeal. Rule 24 of the Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure emphasizes the importance of raising objections, making motions, or presenting arguments in the trial court to make sure that issues are preserved for appellate review. Failure to preserve issues properly may result in those issues being waived on appeal.

Grounds for Filing an Appeal

Grounds for filing an appeal encompass a range of legal bases on which a party may seek review of a lower court's decision in Utah. When contemplating whether to file an appeal, it is important to understand the specific grounds that justify such action. Here are some key points to keep in mind:

Notice of Appeal: One of the initial steps in filing an appeal is submitting a formal notice of appeal to the appropriate court, as per Rule 3 of the Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Transcript: Ensuring an accurate record of the proceedings is crucial. Rule 11 of the Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure outlines the requirements for preparing the transcript for the appellate court.

Prejudice: Demonstrating that the lower court's decision was prejudicial and had a significant impact on the outcome of the case is a common ground for filing an appeal.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari: If seeking review by the Utah Supreme Court, filing a petition for a writ of certiorari is necessary to request the court's review of the lower court's decision.

Legal Errors: Identifying legal errors, such as misapplication of the law or procedural errors, can also form the basis for an appeal. It is essential to cite specific rules or statutes that were allegedly misinterpreted or overlooked.

Understanding these grounds is essential when contemplating whether to pursue an appeal in Utah.

Preparing for Appellate Review

When considering preparing for appellate review in Utah, it is essential to meticulously adhere to the procedural requirements outlined in the Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure and the Utah Code. Appellate review involves a higher court reviewing a lower court's decision to determine if any errors were made. The appellate court conducts a de novo review of the case, meaning it looks at the case with a fresh perspective and does not give deference to the lower court's judgment.

To initiate the appellate process, the party seeking review must file a notice of appeal within the specified timeframe as per Rule 3 of the Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure. Subsequently, the appellant must file a docketing statement, as required by Rule 4, to provide essential case information to the appellate court.

Moreover, preparing persuasive appellate briefs is vital. An appellant's brief must present arguments supported by legal authority and facts to convince the appellate court to reverse the lower court's decision. Conversely, the appellee's brief aims to uphold the lower court's judgment by demonstrating why it was correctly decided. Each brief must adhere to the formatting and content requirements outlined in Rule 24 of the Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure.

The Role of Oral Arguments

Oral arguments play an essential role in the appellate process, providing an opportunity for litigants to present their case directly to the appellate court. During oral arguments, you have the chance to address the judges, clarify legal points, and counter any questions they may have. Here are five key aspects of the role of oral arguments in the appellate process:

Clarification: Oral arguments allow you to elucidate complex legal issues or nuances that may not have been fully understood from the written briefs alone.

Persuasion: It is your opportunity to convincingly argue your position, highlighting key facts and legal principles to sway the judges in your favor.

Question Answering: The judges may have specific questions they want you to address, and oral arguments give you the chance to directly respond to these queries.

Rebuttal: You can use oral arguments to counter points made by the opposing party, strengthening your own position and undermining theirs.

Time Limit: Be mindful of the time constraints set by the Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure; effective time management during oral arguments is crucial to ensure you cover all essential points.

In both civil appeals and administrative agency appeals, the oral arguments stage is a critical juncture in the appellate process, where your advocacy skills and legal knowledge are put to the test.

Potential Outcomes of Appeals

Upon review of the appellate process, the potential outcomes of appeals are varied and can greatly impact the final resolution of a case. When it comes to a juvenile court appeal, the ruling can be affirmed, reversed, or remanded for further proceedings. In criminal appeals, the appellate court may uphold the conviction, order a new trial, or even dismiss the case entirely based on legal errors. In small claims appeals, the decision could be upheld, modified, or reversed based on the facts presented.

Understanding the rules governing appeals is important in anticipating potential outcomes. The Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure outline the procedures for appealing a decision from the district court, juvenile court, or other lower courts. These rules provide a framework for how appeals are conducted, the deadlines for filing appeals, and the requirements for presenting arguments before the appellate court.

In the domain of civil procedure, the Utah Code also sets forth specific guidelines for appealing decisions in various types of cases. Whether it's a juvenile court appeal, criminal appeal, or small claims appeal, following the established rules is essential to achieving a favorable outcome. By adhering to these rules and presenting a compelling case on appeal, you can increase the likelihood of a successful resolution to your legal matter.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I Appeal a Small Claims Court Decision?

So, you've just received a decision from small claims court that you're not thrilled about. Wondering if you can appeal? Let's delve into and explore the process and options available to you.

How Long Do I Have to File an Appeal?

You have 30 days from the date of the final judgment to file an appeal in Utah. Make sure to adhere to this timeline as missing it can result in losing your right to appeal.

What Happens if the Appellate Court Disagrees With the Lower Court's Decision?

If the appellate court disagrees with the lower court's decision, it can overturn the ruling, modify it, or send it back for further consideration. Understanding the reasons for the disagreement is vital for your case.

Is It Possible to Appeal a Default Judgment?

If you miss responding to a lawsuit, the court may enter a default judgment against you. Appealing a default judgment can be complex, but it is possible under certain circumstances. Legal advice is essential.

Can I Represent Myself in an Appellate Court?

Yes, you can represent yourself in an appellate court. It is important to thoroughly understand the rules, procedures, and deadlines in appellate practice. Consider seeking guidance or legal advice to navigate the complexities effectively.

Areas We Serve in Utah

We serve individuals and businesses in the following Utah locations:

Salt Lake City Utah West Valley City Utah Provo Utah West Jordan Utah Orem Utah Sandy Utah Ogden Utah St. George Utah Layton Utah South Jordan Utah Lehi Utah Millcreek Utah Taylorsville Utah Logan Utah Murray Utah Draper Utah Bountiful Utah Riverton Utah Herriman Utah Spanish Fork Utah Roy Utah Pleasant Grove Utah Kearns Utah Tooele Utah Cottonwood Heights Utah Midvale Utah Springville Utah Eagle Mountain Utah Cedar City Utah Kaysville Utah Clearfield Utah Holladay Utah American Fork Utah Syracuse Utah Saratoga Springs Utah Magna Utah Washington Utah South Salt Lake Utah Farmington Utah Clinton Utah North Salt Lake Utah Payson Utah North Ogden Utah Brigham City Utah Highland Utah Centerville Utah Hurricane Utah South Ogden Utah Heber Utah West Haven Utah Bluffdale Utah Santaquin Utah Smithfield Utah Woods Cross Utah Grantsville Utah Lindon Utah North Logan Utah West Point Utah Vernal Utah Alpine Utah Cedar Hills Utah Pleasant View Utah Mapleton Utah Stansbury Par Utah Washington Terrace Utah Riverdale Utah Hooper Utah Tremonton Utah Ivins Utah Park City Utah Price Utah Hyrum Utah Summit Park Utah Salem Utah Richfield Utah Santa Clara Utah Providence Utah South Weber Utah Vineyard Utah Ephraim Utah Roosevelt Utah Farr West Utah Plain City Utah Nibley Utah Enoch Utah Harrisville Utah Snyderville Utah Fruit Heights Utah Nephi Utah White City Utah West Bountiful Utah Sunset Utah Moab Utah Midway Utah Perry Utah Kanab Utah Hyde Park Utah Silver Summit Utah La Verkin Utah Morgan Utah

Utah Appeals Lawyer Consultation

When you need help from a Utah appeals lawyer, call Jeremy D. Eveland, MBA, JD (801) 613-1472 for a consultation.

Jeremy Eveland 17 North State Street Lindon UT 84042 (801) 613-1472

Home

Related Posts

What Is A Conflict Of Interest For A Lawyer?

Business Lawyer Clinton Utah

Understanding Utah’s Labor Laws

Business Lawyer North Salt Lake Utah

Product Liability Laws in Utah

Business Lawyer Payson Utah

Preventing Cybersecurity Breaches

Business Lawyer North Ogden Utah

Shareholder Agreements in Utah

Business Lawyer Hurricane Utah

Tax Status and LLC Types

Corporate Attorney West Jordan UT

Estate Planning For Survivorship Considerations

Estate Plan Update

Construction Lawyer West Bountiful Utah

Estate Planning for Business Asset Protection

Estate Planning for Children

Are Small Business Loans Worth It?

Business Succession Planning Lawyer

Alimony Lawyer

Business Lawyer for LLC

Attorneys in Utah

Read more here https://jeremyeveland.com/appeals/

[beautiful-cute-girl]

Appeals

As you navigate the intricate world of legal proceedings, you might not be aware of the complex dance of strategies and nuances that define the world of appeals. From the meticulous crafting of appellate briefs to the art of persuasive oral arguments, every step in the process holds the potential to sway the outcome of your case. But did you know that there's a lesser-known aspect that can greatly impact the success of your appeal? Stay tuned to uncover this critical element that could be the key to achieving a favorable verdict in the appellate courts.

Key Takeaways

Understanding harmless error is crucial for appeal success.

Proper preservation of issues essential for appellate review.

Steps from notice of appeal to court of appeals.

Importance of accurate transcript and demonstrating prejudice.

Filing petition for writ of certiorari for Supreme Court review.

Understanding the Appeals Process

To navigate the intricate legal landscape of appeals effectively, you must have a thorough understanding of the appeals process as outlined in the Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure and the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure. When considering an appeal, it is important to comprehend the steps involved in moving a case from the district court to the court of appeals in Utah.

Piercing the Corporate Veil

One key aspect to grasp is the concept of harmless error. According to Rule 11 of the Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure, harmless error occurs when an error, defect, irregularity, or variance does not affect substantial rights. Understanding what constitutes harmless error can impact the success of an appeal significantly.

Another essential element is the preservation of issues for appeal. Rule 24 of the Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure emphasizes the importance of raising objections, making motions, or presenting arguments in the trial court to make sure that issues are preserved for appellate review. Failure to preserve issues properly may result in those issues being waived on appeal.

Grounds for Filing an Appeal

Grounds for filing an appeal encompass a range of legal bases on which a party may seek review of a lower court's decision in Utah. When contemplating whether to file an appeal, it is important to understand the specific grounds that justify such action. Here are some key points to keep in mind:

Notice of Appeal: One of the initial steps in filing an appeal is submitting a formal notice of appeal to the appropriate court, as per Rule 3 of the Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Transcript: Ensuring an accurate record of the proceedings is crucial. Rule 11 of the Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure outlines the requirements for preparing the transcript for the appellate court.

Prejudice: Demonstrating that the lower court's decision was prejudicial and had a significant impact on the outcome of the case is a common ground for filing an appeal.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari: If seeking review by the Utah Supreme Court, filing a petition for a writ of certiorari is necessary to request the court's review of the lower court's decision.

Legal Errors: Identifying legal errors, such as misapplication of the law or procedural errors, can also form the basis for an appeal. It is essential to cite specific rules or statutes that were allegedly misinterpreted or overlooked.

Understanding these grounds is essential when contemplating whether to pursue an appeal in Utah.

Preparing for Appellate Review

When considering preparing for appellate review in Utah, it is essential to meticulously adhere to the procedural requirements outlined in the Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure and the Utah Code. Appellate review involves a higher court reviewing a lower court's decision to determine if any errors were made. The appellate court conducts a de novo review of the case, meaning it looks at the case with a fresh perspective and does not give deference to the lower court's judgment.

To initiate the appellate process, the party seeking review must file a notice of appeal within the specified timeframe as per Rule 3 of the Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure. Subsequently, the appellant must file a docketing statement, as required by Rule 4, to provide essential case information to the appellate court.

Moreover, preparing persuasive appellate briefs is vital. An appellant's brief must present arguments supported by legal authority and facts to convince the appellate court to reverse the lower court's decision. Conversely, the appellee's brief aims to uphold the lower court's judgment by demonstrating why it was correctly decided. Each brief must adhere to the formatting and content requirements outlined in Rule 24 of the Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure.

The Role of Oral Arguments

Oral arguments play an essential role in the appellate process, providing an opportunity for litigants to present their case directly to the appellate court. During oral arguments, you have the chance to address the judges, clarify legal points, and counter any questions they may have. Here are five key aspects of the role of oral arguments in the appellate process:

Clarification: Oral arguments allow you to elucidate complex legal issues or nuances that may not have been fully understood from the written briefs alone.

Persuasion: It is your opportunity to convincingly argue your position, highlighting key facts and legal principles to sway the judges in your favor.

Question Answering: The judges may have specific questions they want you to address, and oral arguments give you the chance to directly respond to these queries.

Rebuttal: You can use oral arguments to counter points made by the opposing party, strengthening your own position and undermining theirs.

Time Limit: Be mindful of the time constraints set by the Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure; effective time management during oral arguments is crucial to ensure you cover all essential points.

In both civil appeals and administrative agency appeals, the oral arguments stage is a critical juncture in the appellate process, where your advocacy skills and legal knowledge are put to the test.

Potential Outcomes of Appeals

Upon review of the appellate process, the potential outcomes of appeals are varied and can greatly impact the final resolution of a case. When it comes to a juvenile court appeal, the ruling can be affirmed, reversed, or remanded for further proceedings. In criminal appeals, the appellate court may uphold the conviction, order a new trial, or even dismiss the case entirely based on legal errors. In small claims appeals, the decision could be upheld, modified, or reversed based on the facts presented.

Understanding the rules governing appeals is important in anticipating potential outcomes. The Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure outline the procedures for appealing a decision from the district court, juvenile court, or other lower courts. These rules provide a framework for how appeals are conducted, the deadlines for filing appeals, and the requirements for presenting arguments before the appellate court.

In the domain of civil procedure, the Utah Code also sets forth specific guidelines for appealing decisions in various types of cases. Whether it's a juvenile court appeal, criminal appeal, or small claims appeal, following the established rules is essential to achieving a favorable outcome. By adhering to these rules and presenting a compelling case on appeal, you can increase the likelihood of a successful resolution to your legal matter.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I Appeal a Small Claims Court Decision?

So, you've just received a decision from small claims court that you're not thrilled about. Wondering if you can appeal? Let's delve into and explore the process and options available to you.

How Long Do I Have to File an Appeal?

You have 30 days from the date of the final judgment to file an appeal in Utah. Make sure to adhere to this timeline as missing it can result in losing your right to appeal.

What Happens if the Appellate Court Disagrees With the Lower Court's Decision?

If the appellate court disagrees with the lower court's decision, it can overturn the ruling, modify it, or send it back for further consideration. Understanding the reasons for the disagreement is vital for your case.

Is It Possible to Appeal a Default Judgment?

If you miss responding to a lawsuit, the court may enter a default judgment against you. Appealing a default judgment can be complex, but it is possible under certain circumstances. Legal advice is essential.

Can I Represent Myself in an Appellate Court?

Yes, you can represent yourself in an appellate court. It is important to thoroughly understand the rules, procedures, and deadlines in appellate practice. Consider seeking guidance or legal advice to navigate the complexities effectively.

Areas We Serve in Utah

We serve individuals and businesses in the following Utah locations:

Salt Lake City Utah West Valley City Utah Provo Utah West Jordan Utah Orem Utah Sandy Utah Ogden Utah St. George Utah Layton Utah South Jordan Utah Lehi Utah Millcreek Utah Taylorsville Utah Logan Utah Murray Utah Draper Utah Bountiful Utah Riverton Utah Herriman Utah Spanish Fork Utah Roy Utah Pleasant Grove Utah Kearns Utah Tooele Utah Cottonwood Heights Utah Midvale Utah Springville Utah Eagle Mountain Utah Cedar City Utah Kaysville Utah Clearfield Utah Holladay Utah American Fork Utah Syracuse Utah Saratoga Springs Utah Magna Utah Washington Utah South Salt Lake Utah Farmington Utah Clinton Utah North Salt Lake Utah Payson Utah North Ogden Utah Brigham City Utah Highland Utah Centerville Utah Hurricane Utah South Ogden Utah Heber Utah West Haven Utah Bluffdale Utah Santaquin Utah Smithfield Utah Woods Cross Utah Grantsville Utah Lindon Utah North Logan Utah West Point Utah Vernal Utah Alpine Utah Cedar Hills Utah Pleasant View Utah Mapleton Utah Stansbury Par Utah Washington Terrace Utah Riverdale Utah Hooper Utah Tremonton Utah Ivins Utah Park City Utah Price Utah Hyrum Utah Summit Park Utah Salem Utah Richfield Utah Santa Clara Utah Providence Utah South Weber Utah Vineyard Utah Ephraim Utah Roosevelt Utah Farr West Utah Plain City Utah Nibley Utah Enoch Utah Harrisville Utah Snyderville Utah Fruit Heights Utah Nephi Utah White City Utah West Bountiful Utah Sunset Utah Moab Utah Midway Utah Perry Utah Kanab Utah Hyde Park Utah Silver Summit Utah La Verkin Utah Morgan Utah

Utah Appeals Lawyer Consultation

When you need help from a Utah appeals lawyer, call Jeremy D. Eveland, MBA, JD (801) 613-1472 for a consultation.

Jeremy Eveland 17 North State Street Lindon UT 84042 (801) 613-1472

Home

Related Posts

What Is A Conflict Of Interest For A Lawyer?

Business Lawyer Clinton Utah

Understanding Utah’s Labor Laws

Business Lawyer North Salt Lake Utah

Product Liability Laws in Utah

Business Lawyer Payson Utah

Preventing Cybersecurity Breaches

Business Lawyer North Ogden Utah

Shareholder Agreements in Utah

Business Lawyer Hurricane Utah

Tax Status and LLC Types

Corporate Attorney West Jordan UT

Estate Planning For Survivorship Considerations

Estate Plan Update

Construction Lawyer West Bountiful Utah

Estate Planning for Business Asset Protection

Estate Planning for Children

Are Small Business Loans Worth It?

Business Succession Planning Lawyer

Alimony Lawyer

Business Lawyer for LLC

Attorneys in Utah

Read more here https://jeremyeveland.com/appeals/

[ambvr]

Appeals

As you navigate the intricate world of legal proceedings, you might not be aware of the complex dance of strategies and nuances that define the world of appeals. From the meticulous crafting of appellate briefs to the art of persuasive oral arguments, every step in the process holds the potential to sway the outcome of your case. But did you know that there's a lesser-known aspect that can greatly impact the success of your appeal? Stay tuned to uncover this critical element that could be the key to achieving a favorable verdict in the appellate courts.

Key Takeaways

Understanding harmless error is crucial for appeal success.

Proper preservation of issues essential for appellate review.

Steps from notice of appeal to court of appeals.

Importance of accurate transcript and demonstrating prejudice.

Filing petition for writ of certiorari for Supreme Court review.

Understanding the Appeals Process

To navigate the intricate legal landscape of appeals effectively, you must have a thorough understanding of the appeals process as outlined in the Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure and the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure. When considering an appeal, it is important to comprehend the steps involved in moving a case from the district court to the court of appeals in Utah.

Piercing the Corporate Veil

One key aspect to grasp is the concept of harmless error. According to Rule 11 of the Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure, harmless error occurs when an error, defect, irregularity, or variance does not affect substantial rights. Understanding what constitutes harmless error can impact the success of an appeal significantly.

Another essential element is the preservation of issues for appeal. Rule 24 of the Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure emphasizes the importance of raising objections, making motions, or presenting arguments in the trial court to make sure that issues are preserved for appellate review. Failure to preserve issues properly may result in those issues being waived on appeal.

Grounds for Filing an Appeal

Grounds for filing an appeal encompass a range of legal bases on which a party may seek review of a lower court's decision in Utah. When contemplating whether to file an appeal, it is important to understand the specific grounds that justify such action. Here are some key points to keep in mind:

Notice of Appeal: One of the initial steps in filing an appeal is submitting a formal notice of appeal to the appropriate court, as per Rule 3 of the Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Transcript: Ensuring an accurate record of the proceedings is crucial. Rule 11 of the Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure outlines the requirements for preparing the transcript for the appellate court.

Prejudice: Demonstrating that the lower court's decision was prejudicial and had a significant impact on the outcome of the case is a common ground for filing an appeal.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari: If seeking review by the Utah Supreme Court, filing a petition for a writ of certiorari is necessary to request the court's review of the lower court's decision.

Legal Errors: Identifying legal errors, such as misapplication of the law or procedural errors, can also form the basis for an appeal. It is essential to cite specific rules or statutes that were allegedly misinterpreted or overlooked.

Understanding these grounds is essential when contemplating whether to pursue an appeal in Utah.

Preparing for Appellate Review

When considering preparing for appellate review in Utah, it is essential to meticulously adhere to the procedural requirements outlined in the Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure and the Utah Code. Appellate review involves a higher court reviewing a lower court's decision to determine if any errors were made. The appellate court conducts a de novo review of the case, meaning it looks at the case with a fresh perspective and does not give deference to the lower court's judgment.

To initiate the appellate process, the party seeking review must file a notice of appeal within the specified timeframe as per Rule 3 of the Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure. Subsequently, the appellant must file a docketing statement, as required by Rule 4, to provide essential case information to the appellate court.

Moreover, preparing persuasive appellate briefs is vital. An appellant's brief must present arguments supported by legal authority and facts to convince the appellate court to reverse the lower court's decision. Conversely, the appellee's brief aims to uphold the lower court's judgment by demonstrating why it was correctly decided. Each brief must adhere to the formatting and content requirements outlined in Rule 24 of the Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure.

The Role of Oral Arguments

Oral arguments play an essential role in the appellate process, providing an opportunity for litigants to present their case directly to the appellate court. During oral arguments, you have the chance to address the judges, clarify legal points, and counter any questions they may have. Here are five key aspects of the role of oral arguments in the appellate process:

Clarification: Oral arguments allow you to elucidate complex legal issues or nuances that may not have been fully understood from the written briefs alone.

Persuasion: It is your opportunity to convincingly argue your position, highlighting key facts and legal principles to sway the judges in your favor.

Question Answering: The judges may have specific questions they want you to address, and oral arguments give you the chance to directly respond to these queries.

Rebuttal: You can use oral arguments to counter points made by the opposing party, strengthening your own position and undermining theirs.

Time Limit: Be mindful of the time constraints set by the Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure; effective time management during oral arguments is crucial to ensure you cover all essential points.

In both civil appeals and administrative agency appeals, the oral arguments stage is a critical juncture in the appellate process, where your advocacy skills and legal knowledge are put to the test.

Potential Outcomes of Appeals

Upon review of the appellate process, the potential outcomes of appeals are varied and can greatly impact the final resolution of a case. When it comes to a juvenile court appeal, the ruling can be affirmed, reversed, or remanded for further proceedings. In criminal appeals, the appellate court may uphold the conviction, order a new trial, or even dismiss the case entirely based on legal errors. In small claims appeals, the decision could be upheld, modified, or reversed based on the facts presented.

Understanding the rules governing appeals is important in anticipating potential outcomes. The Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure outline the procedures for appealing a decision from the district court, juvenile court, or other lower courts. These rules provide a framework for how appeals are conducted, the deadlines for filing appeals, and the requirements for presenting arguments before the appellate court.

In the domain of civil procedure, the Utah Code also sets forth specific guidelines for appealing decisions in various types of cases. Whether it's a juvenile court appeal, criminal appeal, or small claims appeal, following the established rules is essential to achieving a favorable outcome. By adhering to these rules and presenting a compelling case on appeal, you can increase the likelihood of a successful resolution to your legal matter.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I Appeal a Small Claims Court Decision?

So, you've just received a decision from small claims court that you're not thrilled about. Wondering if you can appeal? Let's delve into and explore the process and options available to you.

How Long Do I Have to File an Appeal?

You have 30 days from the date of the final judgment to file an appeal in Utah. Make sure to adhere to this timeline as missing it can result in losing your right to appeal.

What Happens if the Appellate Court Disagrees With the Lower Court's Decision?

If the appellate court disagrees with the lower court's decision, it can overturn the ruling, modify it, or send it back for further consideration. Understanding the reasons for the disagreement is vital for your case.

Is It Possible to Appeal a Default Judgment?

If you miss responding to a lawsuit, the court may enter a default judgment against you. Appealing a default judgment can be complex, but it is possible under certain circumstances. Legal advice is essential.

Can I Represent Myself in an Appellate Court?

Yes, you can represent yourself in an appellate court. It is important to thoroughly understand the rules, procedures, and deadlines in appellate practice. Consider seeking guidance or legal advice to navigate the complexities effectively.

Areas We Serve in Utah

We serve individuals and businesses in the following Utah locations:

Salt Lake City Utah West Valley City Utah Provo Utah West Jordan Utah Orem Utah Sandy Utah Ogden Utah St. George Utah Layton Utah South Jordan Utah Lehi Utah Millcreek Utah Taylorsville Utah Logan Utah Murray Utah Draper Utah Bountiful Utah Riverton Utah Herriman Utah Spanish Fork Utah Roy Utah Pleasant Grove Utah Kearns Utah Tooele Utah Cottonwood Heights Utah Midvale Utah Springville Utah Eagle Mountain Utah Cedar City Utah Kaysville Utah Clearfield Utah Holladay Utah American Fork Utah Syracuse Utah Saratoga Springs Utah Magna Utah Washington Utah South Salt Lake Utah Farmington Utah Clinton Utah North Salt Lake Utah Payson Utah North Ogden Utah Brigham City Utah Highland Utah Centerville Utah Hurricane Utah South Ogden Utah Heber Utah West Haven Utah Bluffdale Utah Santaquin Utah Smithfield Utah Woods Cross Utah Grantsville Utah Lindon Utah North Logan Utah West Point Utah Vernal Utah Alpine Utah Cedar Hills Utah Pleasant View Utah Mapleton Utah Stansbury Par Utah Washington Terrace Utah Riverdale Utah Hooper Utah Tremonton Utah Ivins Utah Park City Utah Price Utah Hyrum Utah Summit Park Utah Salem Utah Richfield Utah Santa Clara Utah Providence Utah South Weber Utah Vineyard Utah Ephraim Utah Roosevelt Utah Farr West Utah Plain City Utah Nibley Utah Enoch Utah Harrisville Utah Snyderville Utah Fruit Heights Utah Nephi Utah White City Utah West Bountiful Utah Sunset Utah Moab Utah Midway Utah Perry Utah Kanab Utah Hyde Park Utah Silver Summit Utah La Verkin Utah Morgan Utah

Utah Appeals Lawyer Consultation

When you need help from a Utah appeals lawyer, call Jeremy D. Eveland, MBA, JD (801) 613-1472 for a consultation.

Jeremy Eveland 17 North State Street Lindon UT 84042 (801) 613-1472

Home

Related Posts

What Is A Conflict Of Interest For A Lawyer?

Business Lawyer Clinton Utah

Understanding Utah’s Labor Laws

Business Lawyer North Salt Lake Utah

Product Liability Laws in Utah

Business Lawyer Payson Utah

Preventing Cybersecurity Breaches

Business Lawyer North Ogden Utah

Shareholder Agreements in Utah

Business Lawyer Hurricane Utah

Tax Status and LLC Types

Corporate Attorney West Jordan UT

Estate Planning For Survivorship Considerations

Estate Plan Update

Construction Lawyer West Bountiful Utah

Estate Planning for Business Asset Protection

Estate Planning for Children

Are Small Business Loans Worth It?

Business Succession Planning Lawyer

Alimony Lawyer

Business Lawyer for LLC

Attorneys in Utah

Read more here https://jeremyeveland.com/appeals/

[keshetchai]

Not...entirely? Like sharks are not smooth, and that's the whole joke. But my joke is that things like linsey-woolsey do exist and I think it's a fabric of economic convenience and necessity but not one of like, comfort, "behavior", or ease to wash.

My joke is not saying something blatantly untrue. It's stating an opinion (initially the implication is that this is maybe also God's opinion, which is funny).

My joke is pointing to a bunch of male commentators suggesting there's no real "reason" for this mitzvah and saying "here's a single very mundane reason why this makes sense, actually — that mix suuuuuckkksss." ["Linsey woolsey was a fabric for the lower sort, & plain white is described on some of the poorest enslaved people & servants." There's a reason why this is not a popularly used blend today and why it's sold as a specialty historical fabric lol.]

later I expanded on why it sucks from a textiles perspective. A lot of cellulose/animal fiber blends are kinda wonky! Like...they can do weird things. And materially these fibers are pretty different! Again I stress it was a textile people wove for economic necessity reasons, because it can kinda function for the jobs needed, not because it was like, good. And elsewhere I did delve more into the built in merchant/artisan protections of heavily regulating separate wool and linen industries so prices didn't get undercut badly. Linen was a big deal in ancient Israel and a major economic product!

And then I explicitly made it a feminist commentary based on this joke and the idea that this is somehow "chok" because everyday weaving and laundering is historically a "woman's job."

[barring a side discussion here about later European tapestry weaving being mostly male artisans, the bayeaux tapestry isn't actually tapestry and that says stuff about gender in art history etc etc.]

This is...purely theoretical re: the Rabbis, but also my expansion is based on fairly common art historical and archaeological feminist critique. Like I know that contemporary male scholars have often made assertions that something is "unknown" or "inexplicable," only for a female scholar/practitioner of (whatever thing), or even a male craftsman(!) to write a paper like "this isn't mysterious at all, that's obviously (x)." So of course I believe that the male Talmudic scholars probably have the same instances of perspective blind-spots as contemporary male scholars often do/did.

That's just a much broader structural criticism, which applied to the Talmud and later Talmudic scholars isn't exactly unfair. They do sometimes ask women about "women's issues" and treat them as experts within the Talmud but like...there's still a huuuugeee gap.

It seems like it's without reason, but also whose reason were they looking for? How did they decide that? Who did they ask? Why was it such a mystery? If you're trying to say the reason was just holiness & separation — the rabbis themselves could've literally said that, but they didn't.

So to address "function of halakha" well...if it was about setting us apart from the gentiles, if the argument was to not do as they do in Egypt because paganism— then the rabbis of the Talmud would've just....said that. That's a perfectly sensible reason! It's not without logic because we're told repeatedly not to do various things the Egyptians do. That's clearly "best way to live as a Jew," and certainly would've been seen as logical and explicable.

Fwiw the mishnah says (kilayim 9)

Only that which is spun or woven is forbidden under the law of kilayim, as it says, “You shall not wear shatnez” (Deuteronomy 22:1, that which is shua (combed) tavui (spun) and nuz (woven). Rabbi Shimon ben Elazar says: [the word shaatnez means that] he [the transgressor] is perverted (naloz) and causes his father in heaven to avert himself [from him].

Which is not "because the gentiles mix it"! But the mixing of these fabrics makes you naloz and causes god to avert himself from the shatnez wearer. (Which again this sets embroidery used in the temple apart, and also the separate wool and linen garments).

Nothing is forbidden on account of kilayim except [a mixture of] wool and linen. No [clothing material] is subject to uncleanness by scale disease except wool or linen. Priests do not wear any materials to serve in the Temple except for wool and linen. Camel’s wool with sheep’s wool, that have been mixed together: if the greater part is camel’s wool, it is permitted [to mix it with linen], but if the greater part is sheep’s wool, it is forbidden; if it is half and half, it is forbidden. The same applies to hemp and linen mixed together.

So....comedically, "it sucks and God dislikes it specifically."

Also wool-linen blends only become acceptable when you adjust and are only using one or the other as a small part of a bigger fiber blend. The sheep wool can be used in small amounts to improve the camel's wool and then get mixed with linen, or the linen can be used in small amounts with spun hemp and then mixed with wool, but a direct linen-wool mixture is o-u-t. (There's a hilarious aside here about shatnez wearing being forbidden even if you're trying to evade the tax collector, which...wild lmao).

I also ... Like to be clear I am not personally arguing the Talmud or halakha is mostly a scientific document for the purposes of public health. (I know a lot of other people make more of that argument re: pork/shellfish but...)

I was arguing that when a bunch of dudes said this was a statue perhaps a statue not based on human reasoning/rational logic they were maybe overlooking some very obvious rationales.

And the porcelain thing was because you mentioned a history of analysis and critical thinking being why these scholars would've considered something like this already. So I mentioned something that we've had plenty of time to consider as a new technology under halakha with critical thinking but never actually did that. That's my evidence that critical thinking and questioning doesn't mean the ongoing history of halakha has captured every possible reason, fact, or question involved.

[ Also because that's an actual frustration of mine because porcelain is, theoretically, an ideal kosher material due to vitrification. Accessibility to being Jewish and kosher could skyrocket if you could kasher porcelain with boiling hot water since it's vitrified. I mean if you can kasher a solid quartz slab countertop with boiling water there's no reason why porcelain should be different. It's closer to stone and glass than earthenware!! That's why porcellaneous ceramics are called stoneware!! — This peeve is the result of extensive ceramics studying and handling hundreds and hundreds of sherds and then categorizing and typifying them lol.

...come to think of it, porcelain represents the platonic opposite of how I feel about linsey-woolsey. I dropped out of a PhD program partly because they weren't supporting my porcelain focus/research enough. I love porcelain as a material and am comedically overenthusiastic about it, whilst I am comedically dunking on linsey woolsey for sucking.]

listen to me very very closely: the biblical prohibition against mixing linen and wool is the most SENSIBLE THING IN THE WORLD, do not write it off as silly, unreasonable, or unnecessary. g-d didn’t tell us not to mix linen and wool for no reason, g-d told us not to mix linen and wool together because mixing them is an affront to textiles

[dogexpert08]

The Role of a Pit Bull Expert Witness in Legal Cases

When legal disputes arise involving pit bulls, the need for an experienced Pit Bull expert witness becomes paramount. Legal cases involving dogs, particularly pit bulls, can be complex, requiring someone who thoroughly understands the breed, its behaviors, and its history. Whether the case pertains to dog bites, breed discrimination, or pet ownership disputes, an expert witness can offer crucial insights that help the court understand the facts from a knowledgeable, unbiased perspective.

In this blog, we will explore the importance of a pit bull expert witness in legal scenarios, how they assist attorneys and courts, and why having a California legal dog expert on your side is essential when dealing with dog-related legal matters in the state.

Understanding the Role of a Pit Bull Expert Witness

A Pit Bull expert witness is a professional with extensive knowledge of the pit bull breed, its characteristics, behaviors, and typical temperament. They are often called upon in court cases to provide expert testimony, reports, or consultations related to incidents involving pit bulls. Such cases can range from bite incidents to disputes over breed restrictions or dangerous dog designations.

The testimony provided by an expert witness is critical because it helps the judge or jury understand the breed’s behavior and characteristics from a scientific, data-driven perspective. For example, while pit bulls are often perceived as dangerous due to negative media portrayals, an expert witness can clarify how this perception may not align with the actual temperament and behavior of the dog in question.

Key Responsibilities of a Pit Bull Expert Witness

Behavioral Analysis One of the primary responsibilities of a pit bull expert witness is to analyze the behavior of the dog involved in a case. This analysis could include evaluating the dog's actions leading up to the incident, its history of aggression, or other relevant behavioral traits.

Breed-Specific Knowledge Expert witnesses bring a deep understanding of the pit bull breed, including its lineage, common misconceptions, and differences between subtypes (such as the American Pit Bull Terrier, Staffordshire Bull Terrier, and American Bully). This knowledge helps dispel myths and ensures the court gets accurate information about the breed.

Testimony on Pit Bull Aggression While some pit bulls may show signs of aggression, not all incidents are due to inherent breed traits. A pit bull expert witness can explain whether a dog’s aggression is a result of poor training, neglect, or abuse rather than breed-specific issues. This can be especially important in cases where a dog is labeled as “dangerous” and could face euthanasia.

Insight into Dog Bite Cases Pit bull expert witnesses are frequently involved in dog bite cases. They provide insights into whether the bite was provoked, how severe it was, and if the dog has a history of similar behavior. This can help attorneys build a more informed case, whether representing the dog owner or the injured party.

Why a California Legal Dog Expert Is Important

Dog laws vary significantly by state, and California has specific statutes related to dog ownership and liability. A California legal dog expert is familiar with local regulations, including those regarding dog bites, leash laws, and breed-specific legislation. In California, for example, a dog owner can be held liable for damages if their dog bites someone, regardless of the dog's previous behavior.

A legal dog expert based in California understands these nuances and can guide attorneys and clients through the complexities of state laws. They can also testify in court to clarify how local regulations apply to specific cases involving pit bulls or other breeds.

How a Pit Bull Expert Witness Supports Legal Teams

Attorneys working on cases involving pit bulls often rely on expert witnesses to strengthen their arguments. Whether representing a dog owner accused of negligence or a victim seeking compensation for injuries, an expert witness can provide valuable testimony based on facts, behavioral science, and an understanding of the law.

Their testimony can influence the outcome of a case, as they can offer impartial insights that help judges and juries make informed decisions. This is particularly important in cases where emotional responses to a dog breed may skew the facts.

Conclusion

In legal cases involving pit bulls, having a Pit Bull expert witness can be a game-changer. Their expertise in dog behavior, especially in relation to pit bulls, allows courts to make more informed decisions. Additionally, a California legal dog expert brings critical knowledge of state-specific laws that can help legal teams navigate complex legal scenarios.