#arbitrary action

[townpostin]

Jharkhand High Court Orders Compensation for Arbitrary Demolition of Private Building

State Government Directed to Pay Rs 5 Lakh for Building and Shop Demolitions The Jharkhand High Court has ordered the state government to compensate a Chatra resident for the unlawful demolition of his building. RANCHI – The Jharkhand High Court has directed the state government to pay Rs 5 lakh in compensation for the demolition of a privately owned building that housed five shops. The court…

[lucabyte]

A belief in Nominative Determinsim

[thatscarletflycatcher]

"Everything went wrong after David Bowie died" "everything went wrong after the Reformation"

Me, whose Metaphysics studies and medievalist interests have been heavily shaped by Dominicans: everything went wrong after Ockham et al. sustained the primacy of Will before Good in the nature of God.

[spiritsglade]

what really fucks me up about a death in the family is that, beyond the fact that jason's death was determined by vote, the fact people could vote as many times as they liked, the closeness of the margin, etc.

it's that the vote wasn't for 'does batman get there in time to save jason' it was for 'when bruce digs through that blown up warehouse, does he find a corpse or a living body.' the vote is for 'does jason get to have enough plot armor to survive getting beaten with a crowbar and then blown up'

either way, batman is too late. he was always going to be too late.

[clumsypuppy]

Atla live action 😐

[megayogiposts]

CBI's Role in Tackling Income Tax Corruption

Income tax is the Department of central government so control of its corruption subjects to the ambit of Central Bureau of investigation. It reflects the failure of the premier investigating agency Central Bureau of Investigation. What is the role of Central Bureau of Investigation in the growing corruption in the Department of income tax? Whether the Central Bureau of Investigation will remain…

[muse-write]

So in S3E18, they have to go through a door that only lets the pure of heart through. Snow and Charming go through without any trouble, but Regina only steps through and sees the other side of the door. But I actually expected the show to make it so that Snow couldn’t go through—after all, so much time has been spent recently focusing on her regret over killing Cora, and there was that scene in S2 where Regina shows her her heart and it has a seed of darkness. So…has that gone away or something? Why is Regina not pure of heart and Snow and Charming are?

The Witch of the South says that Regina’s heart is heavy with vengeance and only good witches of light magic can come through—so is being pure of heart a temporary thing? If Regina gave up her want for vengeance in the moment she stepped through would she be considered of pure heart?

[arbitrarycategories]

I forced my mom to agree to watch the live action with me WAYYYY back when the first teaser came out, and she usually hates anime because the animation style and it being in Japanese makes her feel disconnected. She was willing to watch opla but only because it would make me happy. Well we watched the first two episodes last night and now I have been BANNED from watching episode 3 without her. Luffy got another one folks!

[proudfreakmetarusonikku]

see like the thing is I absolutely agree copyright laws are bullshit and need to be changed like asap I just also think Only very poorly regulated technology being able to break them because it’s not being regulated even in that very simple way while everyone else deals with bullshit copyright laws is an even worse situation. if copyright laws aren’t going to be changed it should Not be only random tech developers allowed to break them for no reason.

[starfieldcanvas]

what exactly do you think erotic art is for if not arousal

like. is there a language barrier here? are you sure you are using words the same way as everyone else?

at best the difference in some dictionaries is merely that pornagraphy is a subset of erotica that "has no artistic value," a completely subjective evaluation that tends to be applied to hardcore erotica without any reflection at all regardless of its content.

more people need to give themselves permission to write and draw pornography

[cryptotheism]

One thing I enjoy about bloodborne is the psychological aspect. If you want to survive the hunt, you need particular outlooks and philosophies to act as psychic insulation against the pervasive madness. The madness isn't arbitrary, it's a tightrope.

You have to enjoy hunting enough that you will not hesitate, but you can't enjoy it too much, or you go blood-drunk. You need to be curious, but sober enough to know when to look away, lest you get brain worms. You need to treat it like a job to the point where you can compartmentalize, but not enough that you're easily manipulated by greed. You have to embody humanity through dress and action, but not so much that you become an arrogant zealot obsessed with purity.

Im not really going anywhere with this, that's just such an interesting way to define your protagonist. Especially for a story so obsessed with gothic excess and uberviolence.

[arbitrarycategories]

We’ve seen the first two episodes of opla so I asked my parents who their favorite character is so far. Mom said Luffy (he got another one) and dad said BUGGY

[seemabhatnagar]

High Court of Patna Reinstates Natural Justice, Awards Rs. 5 Lakhs Compensation for Wrongful Termination

The Appellant was not served with a show cause notice to defend herself violates the principles of Natural Justice hence High Court of Patna Quashed the Termination order of the Aganbari Sewika.

The termination was made solely on the grounds of pending criminal charges and the appellant was acquitted of the criminal charges therefore it is deemed inappropriate when she is acquitted.

Since the third-party interest was already created hence reinstatement was not feasible. The Court balanced the need for justice for the appellant by directing compensation instead.

Shubhadra Kumari v. The State of Bihar and 6 others

Letters Patent Appeal 828/2019

Before the High Court of Patna

Heard by Hon'ble Mr. Justice P B Bajanthri & Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Pandey J

Fact:

Shubhadra Kumari, was selected as an Anganbari Sevika in 2003. She was implicated in a criminal case in 2013, as such she was terminated in 2014 by the District Programme Officer (DPO) of Nalanda. Her termination was upheld by the Deputy Director (Welfare) of Patna Division in 2014. Subhadra Kumari-appellant challenged this decision before the High Court through a writ petition, which was dismissed by a Single Judge in 2019, leading to the present appeal.

Legal Issue:

Whether the termination of Shubhadra Kumari from the post of Anganbari Sevika was justified?

Points of Argument

Argument by the Appellant's Counsel:

The appellant had undergone training and had been discharging her duties satisfactorily since 2003, with no complaints regarding her absence before the criminal case.

Prior to the criminal case, she was ill and hospitalized, which justified her absence from work.

She was acquitted of the criminal charges in 2018, which should negate the basis for her termination.

The termination was carried out without serving a show-cause notice, without following proper procedures, and without giving her an opportunity to defend herself.

The termination was abrupt and lacked a proper inquiry, violating the principles of natural justice.

Respondents (State of Bihar and Others):

The termination was based on an inquiry report and due to her continuous absence from duty.

A notice was issued directing the appellant to appear and explain her absence, which could not be served due to her absence.

Given the serious nature of the criminal charges against her, the termination was deemed appropriate.

The termination was affirmed by the superior officers, indicating procedural correctness.

Court’s Observations:

No notice was served on the appellant, which is a violation of the principles of natural justice.

The court emphasized that both quasi-judicial and administrative actions must follow the principles of natural justice, ensuring fair procedures and avoiding arbitrary actions.

The court referred to Supreme Court judgments (D.K. Yadav vs. J.M.A. Industries Ltd. and State Bank of India vs. Rajesh Agarwal) that highlighted the necessity of fair play and reasonable procedures in administrative actions.

The court found that the termination was not justified solely based on the criminal charges, since the appellant was later acquitted.

[morlock-holmes]

The more that the deportation system in your country is fast, cruel, and not subject to appeal the easier it is for people to say,

"Accept my bad actions or you'll be deported."

This applies equally to legal immigrants, illegal immigrants, and people who are temporarily in the country seeking asylum, visas, etc.

I do not understand why people find this confusing.

If you're here on a work visa, and the consequence for being fired is that you are immediately spirited off to a concrete cell which is lit 24/7 and you aren't allowed to contact anybody and eventually they ship you off to an arbitrary city without any of your possessions,

Then your employer has a ton of leverage to say, "Yes we are making you work unpaid overtime and ignoring our supposed obligations under the contract you signed, but if you complain we'll fire you and good luck contesting it from inside your cell or from another country while you look for housing and a job."

That is how "strong border enforcement" creates an underclass.

People seem to respond to this by pretending I'm talking purely about illegal border crossings by people without visas and then explaining that it's fine to go round those people up. Which is simply beside the point.

Honestly border policy appears to involve simply ignoring how immigration works and pretending the policy only applies to criminals crossing the border without a visa.