#erit lux

[yellow-dejavu]

[yellow-dejavu]

You are so right, he is no different from his parents or any other Dark character. The apple doesn't fall far from the tree. The Unknown seems to kill only when necessary. Even if he doesn't like Doris, he doesn't kill her. The Unknown is only there to trigger the divorce of Doris and Egon.

I also think he had a somewhat normal life outside of his role in the timeline. Agnes refers to The Unknown as her husband, he named their child, and he had a souvenir of her that he gave to their child.

We don't really know much about the family dynamics in Eva's world, but we could see that Eva really tried to keep the family together. Bartosz and Egon didn't die, and they were working with their kids. The Unknown may have even raised the Tronte from his world. Sadly, we don't get to see more of his backstory.

The Unknown + caring about his father, his son and his mother

[schmilsson]

even though i know who everyone is now. i think. i still have genuinely zero sense of when an adult involved with sic mundus/erit lux is telling the truth all of their motivations are inscrutable to me and idk how much of that is intentional

[powermove102]

One thing I will never get over is the absolute lack of information we got about the alt world in S3 of Dark. And the specific thing just so happens to be exactly what I want more information from in Adam's world as well, and that is Noah and Bartosz.

SPECIFICALLY the fact that Bartosz looks a lot more devoted to Erit Lux than Sic Mundus, and honestly so does Noah, leading me to believe that Eva is a whole lot more transparent about her goals and her followers do not get betrayed by her (at least not when compared to Adam's fuckery). Which LEADS me to believe Noah and Bartosz could actually have a good relationship in this world!!

I'm honestly not sure what time period they're in, since we see Bartosz get saved from the apocalypse by himself but don't get to see where he goes, nor do we see ANYTHING about Noah's past, and Silja is nowhere to be seen so maybe she still dies young (or she just doesn't work for Eva).

[orietursicutsol]

Feria quinta infra Octavam Sanctissimae Trinitatis in Festo Sanctissimi Corporis Christi

Introitus (Cibavit eos) Graduale (Oculi omnium) Alleluia (Caro mea) Sequentia (Lauda Sion Salvatorem) Offertorium (Portas caeli) Communio (Qui manducat)

Hymnus ad laudes (Verbum supernum) Hymnus ad procesionem (Pange Lingua)

Responsorium (Quam magna)

Introitus (Ps. 80, 17 et 2.3.11) Cibávit eos ex ádipe fruménti, allelúia: et de petra, melle saturávit eos, allelúia, allelúia, allelúia. Ps Exsultáte Deo, adiutóri nostro: iubiláte Deo Iacob.

Graduale (Ps. 144, 15 V 16) Oculi ómnium in te sperant, Dómine: et tu das illis escam in témpore opportúno, V. Aperis tu manum tuam: et imples omne animal benedictióne.

Alleluia (Io. 6, 56.57) Caro mea vere est cibus, et sanguis meus vere est potus: qui mandúcat meam carnem et bibit meum sánguinem, in me manet et ego in eo. Alleluia.

Sequentia Lauda, Sion, Salvatórem, lauda ducem et pastórem in hymnis et cánticis. Quantum potes, tantum aude: quia maior omni laude, nec laudáre súfficis. Laudis thema speciális, panis vivus et vitális hódie propónitur. Quem in sacræ mensa cenæ turbæ fratrum duodénæ datum non ambígitur. Sit laus plena, sit sonóra, sit iucúnda, sit decóra mentis iubilátio. Dies enim sollémnis agitur, in qua mensæ prima recólitur huius institútio. In hac mensa novi Regis, novum Pascha novæ legis Phase vetus términat. Vetustátem nóvitas, umbram fugat véritas, noctem lux elíminat. Quod in cœna Christus gessit, faciéndum hoc expréssit in sui memóriam. Docti sacris institútis, panem, vinum in salútis consecrámus hóstiam. Dogma datur Christiánis, quod in carnem transit panis et vinum in sánguinem. Quod non capis, quod non vides, animosa fírmat fides, præter rerum órdinem. Sub divérsis speciébus, signis tantum, et non rebus, latent res exímiæ. Caro cibus, sanguis potus: manet tamen Christus totus sub utráque spécie. A suménte non concísus, non confráctus, non divísus: ínteger accípitur. Sumit unus, sumunt mille: quantum isti, tantum ille: nec sumptus consúmitur. Sumunt boni, sumunt mali sorte tamen inæquáli, vitæ vel intéritus. Mors est malis, vita bonis: vide, paris sumptiónis quam sit dispar éxitus. Fracto demum sacraménto, ne vacílles, sed meménto, tantum esse sub fragménto, quantum toto tégitur. Nulla rei fit scissúra: signi tantum fit fractúra: qua nec status nec statúra signáti minúitur. Ecce panis Angelórum, factus cibus viatórum: vere panis filiórum, non mitténdus cánibus. In figúris præsignátur, cum Isaac immolátur: agnus paschæ deputátur: datur manna pátribus. Bone pastor, panis vere, Iesu, nostri miserére: tu nos pasce, nos tuére: tu nos bona fac vidére in terra vivéntium. Tu, qui cuncta scis et vales: qui nos pascis hic mortáles: tuos ibi commensáles, coherédes et sodáles fac sanctórum cívium. Amen. Allelúia.

Offertorium (Ps. 77: 23-25 / 1) Portas caeli aperuit Dominus: et pluit illis manna, ut ederent: panem caeli dedit illis: / panem angelorum manducavit homo. Allelúia. V./ Attendite popule meus legem meam: inclinate aurem vestram in verba oris mei. /

Communio Quotiescumque manducabitis panem hoc et calicem bibetis, mortem Domini annuntiabitis, donec veniat; itaque: quicumque manducaverit panem vel biberit calicem Domini indigne, reus erit corporis et sanguinis Domini.

Responsorium Quam magna multitudo dulcedinis tuae domine / quam abscondisti timentibus te V/ Perfecisti eis qui sperant in te in conspectu filiorum hominum /

Hymnus ad laudes Verbum supernum prodiens / Nec Patris linquens dexteram, / Ad opus suum exiens / Venit ad vitae vesperam. / In mortem a discipulo / Suis tradendus æmulis, / Prius in vitæ ferculo / Se tradidit discipulis. / Quibus sub bina specie / Carnem dedit et sanguinem; / Ut duplicis substantiæ / Totum cibaret hominem. / Se nascens dedit socium, / Convescens in edulium, / Se moriens in pretium, / Se regnans dat in præmium. / O salutaris hostia, / Quæ cæli pandis ostium, / Bella premunt hostilia; / Da robur, fer auxilium. / Uni trinoque Domino / Sit sempiterna gloria: / Qui vitam sine termino / Nobis donet in patria. / Amen.

Hymnus ad procesionem Pange, lingua, gloriosi / Corporis mysterium, / Sanguinisque pretiosi, / Quem in mundi pretium / Fructus ventris generosi / Rex effudit gentium. Nobis datus, nobis natus / Ex intacta virgine, / Et in mundo conversatus, / Sparso verbi semine, / Sui moras incolatus / Miro clausit ordine. In supremae nocte coenae / Recumbens cum fratribus / Observata lege plene / Cibis in legalibus, / Cibum turbae duodenae / Se dat suis manibus. Verbum caro, panem verum / Verbo carnem efficit: / Fitque sanguis christi merum, / Et si sensus deficit, / Ad firmandum cor sincerum / Sola fides sufficit. Tantum ergo sacramentum / Veneremur cernui: / Et antiquum documentum / Novo cedat ritui: / Praestet fides supplementum / Sensuum defectui. Genitori, genitoque / Laus et jubilatio, / Salus, honor, virtus quoque / Sit et benedictio: / Procedenti ab utroque / Compar sit laudatio. / Amen.

Te laudamus Domine Te laudamus Domine omnipotens, / qui sedes super Cherubim et Seraphim. / Quem benedicunt Angeli, Arcangeli; / et laudant Prophetae et Apostoli. / Te laudamus Domine orando, / qui venisti peccata solvendo. / Te deprecamur magnum Redemptorem, / quem Pater misit ovium pastorem. / Tu es Christus Dominus Salvator, / qui de Maria Virgine es natus. / Hunc Sacrosanctum calicem sumentes, / ab omni culpa libera nos semper.

_ _

Canto-Gregoriano – Corpus Domini Cantori Gregoriani, Fulvio Rampi (1996, Paoline – PCD 021)

[homuraakemis]

#related to this#alt martha eventually cooperates with her older selves which is why eva is more successful than adam#and that's reflected in her universe and how her travelers/erit lux seem better at communicating#meanwhile jonas never teams up with his older selves until the very end#always at odds with himself (tags by caffeinosis)

I think one of the many meaningful messages Dark has successfully managed to convey over the course of its 3 seasons is that at end the end of the day, your worst enemy or obstacle in life is essentially yourself, and I deeply appreciate and respect that.

[boundbylife-brokenbylove]

Final post (2/2)

Ein letztes Geschenk von mir an dich stand noch aus.

Ich wollte, ich hätte mehr Worte, doch ich bin mir sicher dieses Geschenk vermag alles auszudrücken was ich je gefühlt habe und je fühlen werde.

Plötzlich verstehe ich, warum man auf der Erit Lux-Seite steht. Könnte ich die Uhren zurückdrehen würde ich es wieder und wieder tun.

Ich habe dich wirklich aufrichtig geliebt. Und werde es immer tun. Ein Platz in meinem Herzen wird immer für dich reserviert bleiben und die Tür wird sich dir nie völlig verschließen.

Du geselltest dich zu den wenigen Regrets, die ich in meinem Leben wirklich fühle. Und ich würde lügen, wenn ich sagte, dass nicht jedes mal wenn dein Name auf meinem Display aufploppt, mein Herz kurz aussetzt.

Doch ich habe verstanden, dass in deinem Leben kein Platz für mich ist. Nicht für den Leon zumindest, dem etwas an dir liegt. Der eine Zukunft mit dir aufbauen wollte. Der dich in seinen Träumen noch "right here in my arms" hält. Dessen einziger Wunsch für's Leben aus dir Bestand... der dich ehrlich und wahrhaftig geliebt hat.

Und ich sage dir jetzt Worte, die vor dir nur zwei andere Menschen je gehört haben, weil du sie zu hören verdienst.

Ich will, dass du weißt, dass vollkommen egal, was dir auch im Leben widerfahren mag, wohin es dich treibt oder welchen Widrigkeiten du dich ausgesetzt siehst und völlig gleich, wie weit es uns voneinander entfernen mag:

Du wurdest wenigstens einmal in deinem ehrlich und aufrichtig und von tiefstem Herzen und bis ans Ende der Welt geliebt.

Es gibt noch so vieles, was ich dir sagen will aber ich denke nicht, dass ich das noch sollte. Unsere Zeit ist einfach um.

Ich werde immer Schmerzen empfinden, wenn ich dich ansehe oder mit dir rede. Oder auch nur über dich. Es wird mir immer weh tun, wenn ich daran denke, dass dein Leben ohne mich weitergeht und du anscheinend sogar glücklicher bist. Aber ich werde dir nicht mehr im Wege stehen. Und ich hoffe, dass du dann jetzt ohne mich das Glück gefunden hast, was du schon so lange suchst.

Ich liebe dich, Pumpkin.

"Ist es das was wir sind? Nur ein Traum? Es hat uns nie wirklich gegeben?"

...

"Wir passen perfekt zusammen. Glaub nie etwas anderes."

[hinge]

Hinge presents an anthology of love stories almost never told. Read more on https://no-ordinary-love.co

[rausule]

Fidenter dicere possum me scire: sine omni quod praeterit, nullum futurum tempus praeteritum; sine ullo futuro, nullum futurum tempus; sine omni quod est, nullum esset tempus praesens. Duo ergo horum temporum, praeteritum et futurum, quomodo sunt, cum illud iam non sit, hoc nondum est? praesens autem, si semper esset praesens, quin se transferret in praeteritum, iam non esset tempus, sed aeternitas. praeteritum, quomodo etiam de eo quod est dicere possumus, si causa est, quod non erit? Ergo de esse temporis veraciter loqui non possumus, nisi secundum quod tendit ad esse non.

Dicimus tamen de longis temporibus et brevibus temporibus et ad praeteritum et ad futurum. Tempus praeteritum longum dicitur si est, verbi gratia ante centum annos; et sic futurum longum, si centum annis posterius est; breve ergo praeteritum est, quando ante decem dies est, et post decem dies futurum breve est. Quomodo autem, quod non est longum aut breve? praeteritum iam non est, futurum nondum est. Ideo de tempore non dicamus quod longum est, sed de praeterito dicamus quod longum est, de futuro quod longum est. Mi Domine, lux mea, nonne etiam hic hominem tuum irridebit veritas? quare praeteritum tempus, quod longum erat, cum iam praeteritum esset, aut cum adhuc praesens esset? Non potest esse diu, cum aliquid esset quod longum esset. Olim iam non erat, et ideo nec longum esse potuit, quia omnino non erat. Non ergo de praeterito tempore dicamus quod longum est: nihil enim reperiemus, quod longum esset, cum non sit, quod praeteritum est. Dicimus autem illud tempus praesens longum fuisse, quia, cum praesens esset, longum fuit. Ergo non iam praeterit, ut non sit; unum erat, quod longum esse posset. Quae ubi decidit, ilico diu desiit, quia esse desiit.

Consideremus ergo, anima humana, quoniam datum est tibi sentire et metire tempora, utrum praesens tempus possit esse longum. Quid respondebis mihi? Estne centum anni praesentes longum tempus? Primum vide num centum anni praesentes esse possint. Si primum horum centum annorum continuatur, praesens est, sed ceteri nonaginta novem futuri sunt, ergo nondum sunt. Si vero secundus annus in progressu est, primus iam desinit, secundus adest.

[yellow-dejavu]

bartosz tiedemann appreciation post because he's so underrated

[homuraakemis]

When I go looking for Dark discussions on the internet, I keep seeing people saying that Adam won or that Adam was right, and I really disagree with that.

First of all, Adam wasn't right. His solution to "end suffering" was total annihilation, the destruction of both worlds and all life in it. Adam didn't know about a third world, he didn't know that there was a way to untie the knot and still keep one world alive, but he was willing to destroy both worlds anyway. He was ok with destroying all the worlds that he thought existed. All because he and a few people were caught in the time loop. The thing is: the people who suffered because of the time loop were just a handful when compared to all of the people in the entire world. Yes, the time loop was terrible for them, but there were still plenty of people in the world who lived normal and good lives. Who is Adam to decide if all these people in the world deserve to die or not? Who is he to decide whether they have a right to existence or not?

The thing is, Eva is also a terrible person who did terrible things to perpetuate the loop. But if there was no third world, if the only options they had were either keep the loop or destroy all life and existence, then I'm 100% on Eva's side. Just because there's suffering in the world, doesn't mean that there aren't good things, like happiness and love. Just because people are destined to die at some point, doesn't mean that people can't enjoy the time that they do have alive. Just because there's no real free will, doesn't mean that people can't appreciate their lives. Eva's goal recognized just that: that life is still good, even with all the bad things that happen. Meanwhile, Adam's goal was purely nihilistic.

I also see people saying that "technically", Adam won and Eva lost, because Adam's goal was to destroy the two worlds and Eva's goal was to protect her son. But I don't agree with that either. Because Adam's goal was not just to "destroy both worlds" or "destroy the knot": he explicitly says that his goal is total annihilation, eternal darkness, he believes this is the true paradise, and he doesn't get that in the end. The origin world will still exist, and just because the time loop doesn't exist anymore, doesn't mean that this world won't also be full of suffering just like the other two worlds. Suffering is just part of life. So Adam never really achieved his goal of eternal darkness: he achieved his goal of untying the knot, but he had to accept that he wouldn't eradicate suffering, he wouldn't defeat time, and one world would still exist.

Eva didn't "lose" either. Sure, she had one personal goal of keeping her son alive (just like Adam had his own personal goal of ending his own existence, and Claudia had a personal goal of saving Regina), but she also had a more idealistic goal, which was to preserve life (just like Adam and Claudia also had their own idealistic goals beside just their personal goals). She explicitly says that this is her goal when she gives her speech to Erit Lux when she sends them on their missions: "Every darkness is followed by light. With every death comes a life." She is recognizing that yes, there is darkness and death, but there's also life and that's worth preserving. When she convinces Young Martha to kill Jonas, she says "If you want Jonas to live, if you want all of them to live, then we must do what has always been done". She doesn't appeal to Martha using just her son (that she just met), she appeals to her by saying that for "all of them" to live, this is what must be done. Her goal might include her son, but this isn't just about her son, it's about preserving all life. So yes, in the end, Eva doesn't achieve her own personal goal of preserving her son's life, but she does achieve her goal of preserving life through the continued existence of the origin world (and she and Adam both accept their fate of disappearing and face it peacefully).

In the end, neither Eva or Adam win or lose entirely: Adam achieves his personal goal of ending his own existence and his goal of destroying the knot, but not his goal of eternal darkness. Eva achieves her goal of preserving life, but not her goal of protecting her son.

Also, I think it's important to point out that Claudia was more aligned with Eva than with Adam (because I constantly see people saying that Claudia and Adam had "the same goal", which couldn't be further from the truth). Claudia explicitly rejects Adam's point of view when she tells Jonas that Adam "doesn't want to fix things, he wants to destroy them forever". When she first talks to her younger self, the one command she gives to herself is "you must stop Adam". Before she starts to think that there might be a way to untie the knot without destroying life, she was going along with Eva's plans, because she preferred preserving life over Adam's goal of destroying everything.

In the end, neither Adam or Eva truly win. The ones who win are Claudia, young Jonas and young Martha, the ones who hadn't lost hope that they could untie the knot while also saving the world. Claudia wins because she doesn't lose hope, unlike Eva and Adam.

Finally, I guess you could debate on whether the show wants to argue that eternal darkness is a good thing or not. You could argue that the show does want us to see eternal darkness as a good thing, especially considering Hannah's speech about nothingness and darkness in the last scene, and the fact that the show is called Dark. But right after Hannah says that her dream of darkness and nothingness felt like a good thing, the show ends with Hannah musing that she wants to name her son Jonas. The show ends by giving us hope that maybe Jonas will exist somehow, by reminding us of a new life, a new baby about to be born. So I'd argue that the show wants us to consider both sides. And anyway, regardless of the intended message, I still consider that Adam was wrong, regardless of whether he was "partially correct" about erasing the two worlds.

[axolotlus275]

Sic mundus creatus est, erit lux

[orietursicutsol]

In Nativitate Domini ad tertiam Missam in die

Epistola Evangelium

Léctio Epistolæ beáti Pauli Apóstoli ad Hebraéos.

Multifárium multísque modis olim Deus loquens pátribus in prophétis: novíssime diébus istis locútus est nobis in Fílio, quem constítuit herédem universórum, per quem fecit et saécula: qui cum sit splendor glóriæ, et figúra substántiæ ejus, portánsque ómnia verbo virtútis suæ, purgatiónem peccatórum fáciens, sedet ad déxteram majestátis in excélsis: tanto mélior Angelis efféctus, quanto differéntius præ illis nomen hereditávit. Cum enim dixit aliquándo Angelórum: Filius meus es tu, ego hódie genui te? Et rursum: Ego ero illi in patrem, et ipse erit mihi in filium? Et cum iterum indrodúcit primogénitum in orbem terræ, dicit: Et adórent eum omnes Angeli Dei. Et ad Angelos quidem dicit: Qui facit Angelos suos spiritus, et ministros suos flammam ignis. Ad Fílium autem: Thronus tuus, Deus in saéculum saéculi: virga æquitatátis, virga regni tui. Delixisti justitiam, et odisti iniquitátem: proptérea unxit te Deua, Deus tuus, óleo exultatiónis præ particípibus tuis. Et: Tu in princípio Dómine, terram fundásti: et ópera mánuum tuárum sunt cæli. Ipse períbunt, tu autem permanébis; et omnes ut vestiméntum veteráscent: et velut amíctum mutábis eos, et mutabúntur: tu autem idem ipse es, et anni tui non deficient.

Inítium sancti Evangélii secúndum Joánnem.

In princípio erat Verbum, et Verbum erat apud Deum, et Deus erat Verbum. Hoc erat in princípio apud Deum. Omnia per ipsum facta sunt: et sine ipso factum est nihil, quod factum est: in ipso vita erat, et vita erat lux hóminum: et lux in ténebris lucet, et ténebræ eum non comprehendérunt. Fuit homo missus a Deo, cui nomen erat Joánnes. Hic venit in testimónium, ut testimónium perhibéret de lúmine, ut omnes créderent per illum. Non erat ille lux, sed ut testimónium perhibéret de lúmine. Erat lux vera, quæ illúminat omnem hóminem veniéntem in hunc mundum. In mundo erat, et mundus per ipsum factus est, et mundus eum non cognóvit. In própria venit, et sui eum non recepérunt. Quotquot autem recepérunt eum, dedit eis potestátem fílios Dei fíeri, his, qui credunt in nómine ejus: qui non ex sanguínibus, neque ex voluntáte carnis, neque ex voluntáte viri, sed ex Deo nati sunt. [Hic genuflectitur] Et Verbum caro factum est, et habitávit in nobis: et vidimus glóriam ejus, glóriam quasi Unigéniti a Patre, plenum grátiæ et veritátis.

+++

[sexy-zeitreise-detektiv]

Eva: I've come to make an announcement: Jonas Kahnwald a bitch-ass motherfucker. He fucked his fucking aunt. That's right. He took his steampunk lookin' rusty time machine out and he railed his FUCKING aunt, and then he said "wir passen perfekt zusammen :)", and I said "that's disgusting!!". So I'm making a callout post on my twitter dot com - Jonas Kahnwald - you got a clonky time machine. It's the size of this walnut except WAY bigger. And guess what? Here's what my time machine looks like: That's right, baby - hand held size, no tubes, no ugly ass chess design. Look at that, it looks like two balls and a bong. He fucked his aunt, so guess what, I'm gonna fuck his dimension. That's right, this is what you get! My SUPER LASER PISS! Except I'm not gonna piss on Winden, I'm gonna go higher. I'm pissing on the moon! How do you like that, MERKEL? I PISSED ON THE MOON, YOU IDIOT! You have twenty-three hours before the piss DRRRROPLLLETS hit the fucking nuclear reactor, now get out of my fucking sight before I piss on you too.

[henrysglock]

In my personal opinion, the Mindflayer is somewhere between the God particle and AM from IHNMAIMS. None of the references the Duffers use are going to end up being 1:1, so I'm not sure I'd expect the Mindflayer to be anything less than a mishmash of concepts Frankensteined together.

For the light particles, we don't have any current indication that they share the Mindflayer's sentience, nor do we have any concrete proof that the dust particles alone are sentient without a human component (whether that be Henry, Edward, Captain Brenner, Dr. Brenner, or some secret other guy)...but I am staring at the God particle being comprised of Cs-137 vs the initial plan of having the Mindflayer be formed from the rocks/ore of Dimension X before that plot was somewhat scrapped. The inspiration is there!

For the light particles in ST, at least, they seem to center on points of electricity/electrical connection, which seem to be points of direct connection between the RSU and UD—Hence why the kids could communicate via the lights in their UD without having any psionic powers. To me, the light particles are markers of those electrical connection points, similarly to how the orange particles in Dark are leftovers from someone who just connected with/traveled between the Sic Mundus, Erit Lux, or original worlds.

In short: I wonder if the orange particles in ST don't indicate a connection point between timelines.

The ST4 UD is different, however, from the UD in ST1-3, as I outlined here, and that one reminds me more of the time windows within the Sic Mundus universe in Dark, especially since one of those time windows connects to the apocalypse.

Which... a) Intra-timeline time travel is already quite subtextually evident in Stranger Things, and the connection to Henry and El's abilities is something I theorized about last year.

b) An apocalypse is something I speculated on re: why the UD is the way it is in ST1-2 (read: toxic and radioactive), while the kids in ST4 are totally fine hanging out in their UD (they're not the same UDs).

There's also references to the Pocket Universe from Fringe in the ST1 UD, and there's a triangle of dual-or-more timeline references between Fringe (red/blue universes vs the final timeline), Dark (Sic Mundus, Erit Lux, and original timeline), and Stranger Things (Henry, Edward, and the very real possibility of a secret third universe).

So I digressed a bit, but...

tl;dr: The question may not be where Will and the others went in 1983, but when. Likewise, the question in ST4 may be less when and more what world...Which would leave ST5 with the question: when, and in what world?

You ever think about the orange particles left behind by inter-universe/timeline travel in Dark as compared to the new orange particles in ST4.

It's been haunting me bc we don't see these particles until we get the alternate Upside Down (wall gates vs floor gates).

[black-evil-cat]

Eva’s instructions to Erit Lux members 

[ninainthetardis]

By the way, we've had the answer to everything in the opening song all this time:

Please put me to bed

And turn down the light

Fold out your hands

Give me a sign

Hold down your lies

Lay down next to me

Don't listen when I scream

Bury your doubts and fall asleep

Find out:

I was just a bad dream.

Let the bed sheet

Soak up my tears

And watch the only way out disappear

Don't tell me why

Kiss me goodbye

For neither ever, nor never

Goodbye.