#statutory software

[savvyhrms8]

Beyond the Chaos: Why Every Business Needs Statutory Software

Running a business is a bit like juggling fire; exhilarating and intoxicating but one mishap or poor judgement can severely burn you. While you're busy and committed to earning sales and bringing other employees up to speed, developing new products and services, you likely never think about compliance, but it’s there. A silent, ticking time bomb quietly burning away in the background. One improperly submitted remittance or tax return or one missed deadline, and you'll quickly be buried under penalties and fees to recover from just having been ignorant of the rules. This is where statutory software can step in and quietly save the day.

Think about it. With a system that brings every deadline for different types of taxes or labour laws or regulatory changes into your view, and does it automatically, how easy or simple will it be? No more trying to figure out if the amendments you were sent relates to your compliance. Statutory software isn't just another tool; it's peace of mind in a digital experience.

Statutory compliance management software gives businesses the ability to manage chaos. To provide information in a way that aligns your organization with rules that are often communicated without warning. Statutory software is not a public facing asset or service. It is like the stage crew that operates in the background of a play never having the applause but integral to the ability of the show to happen.

Businesses will consistently put time, money and effort into branding, advertising, sales, and forget that one compliance notice can wipe away 3 months of sales revenue or diminished product or service trust. This is not about being a wimp about compliance; it is about being pro-active and putting your business on the lead of the changes as opposed to catching up to them when the storm hits.

If your business feels like it is racing in ten directions, stop. Let statutory software handle the many complexities of law and regulation so you can spend your time building, growing, and leading, which is ultimately, what you love most to do.

Because in the end, peace of mind is the real profit in business.

[savvyhrms01]

The Significance of Statutory Compliance for Your Business.

Okay, so “statutory compliance” may sound like fancy legalese, but it simply means that your business must do what it is required to do. Like traffic laws, you have to follow them or risk being fined or worse.

Really, What Is It?

At its core, statutory compliance means doing everything the government expects from your business. Paying your employees the right way, filing taxes on time, keeping the workplace safe, stuff like that. It’s the basic rulebook for running a legit business.

Why Should You Even Care?

Skipping out on these rules can cause you major headaches. Fines, legal trouble, or even shutting down your business if you’re not careful. Plus, it can hurt how people see your company, customers, and employees alike.

It’s Not Just About Laws, It’s About Trust

When you follow the rules, your employees feel secure and respected. They know they’re getting fair pay, working in a safe place, and that you’re not cutting corners.

The True Issue? The Rules Are Always Changing

The tricky part is that laws are subject to change. They can change quickly. It can feel like running on a treadmill to keep up. You’re in trouble if you miss a deadline or a rule update.

Ways to Make It Simpler

The good news is that some programs and applications can notify you when you have to update your records or file something. They relieve you of a lot of the burden so you can concentrate on managing your company rather than chasing paperwork.

In summary, please don’t ignore it.

I understand that the statutory compliance system isn’t the most thrilling aspect of your work. But believe me, it’s important to consider. It keeps your company operating efficiently and spares you from expensive issues. Continue

[myndsolution1]

A Guide to Statutory Compliance Services for 2025

Structural compliance refers to a predetermined set of rules that are drawn from the legal system and outline the parameters that businesses must operate within. There are several compliance domains, including:

Labour laws

Direct taxation

Indirect taxation

There are several risks associated with non-compliance, including financial losses and harm to the brand’s image.

[spkauditors]

Tired accountants are a common sight in every office in Dubai – sweating over the dynamic nature of tax regulation laws, cyber security issues, inadequate internal control, financial reporting errors, and much more. That’s where we confidently introduce Zoho Books – an all-in-one accounting tool tailored for small business owners in Dubai, UAE.

[trusteasyau]

Navigate the Essentials of Statutory Trust Accounting 

Statutory trust accounting is a specialised area of accounting that ensures trusts adhere to legal regulations and requirements. This form of accounting is crucial for maintaining accountability and transparency in managing fiduciary assets. 

Compliance with statutory trust accounting rules is just a best practice — it’s a legal obligation. This ensures that all transactions are properly documented and that the trust operates within the boundaries of the law. Failure to comply can result in severe penalties and loss of trust from beneficiaries. 

Key Components 

Statutory trust accounting involves tracking income, expenses and distributions related to the trust. It requires detailed record-keeping of all financial activities, including investments, beneficiary payments, and property management. Regular audits and reports are also a significant part of this process, ensuring that the trust’s financial health is transparent and verifiable. 

Benefits of Proper Accounting 

Accurate statutory trust accounting provides several benefits. It helps in safeguarding the trust’s assets, ensuring they are used for their intended purposes. This accounting also fosters trust among beneficiaries, as they can see clear, detailed records of how their assets are being managed. Moreover, it simplifies the process of filing tax returns and meeting other regulatory requirements. 

Tools and Technology 

Modern accounting software can significantly simplify the statutory trust accounting process. These tools offer automated record-keeping, compliance checks, and real-time reporting, making it easier to stay on top of legal requirements and ensure accurate financial management. 

Conclusion 

If you’re managing a trust, adhering to statutory trust accounting principles is essential. Besides ensuring legal compliance, it also builds trust and transparency among beneficiaries. Investing in proper accounting practices and tools can make a significant difference in smooth and lawful operation of your trust. 

[tax-print]

Tax Print: Your One-Stop Shop for All Tax-Related Needs in Mumbai

Tax Print offers a comprehensive range of tax solutions and services for individuals and businesses nationwide. With over 62 years of experience, we are a trusted source for tax-related financial products, software, and expert advice. Their commitment to personalized service ensures you receive the tailored solutions you need at an affordable price.

Tax Print has a rich history, starting as a printing press for government tax forms in Mumbai. They have evolved alongside the industry, partnering with leading software developers to provide cutting-edge solutions for businesses of all sizes. Their team of experts offers valuable insights and support to help you navigate the complexities of tax laws.

Whether you're a chartered accountant, company secretary, or an individual taxpayer, Tax Print is your one-stop shop for all your tax needs.

[daas4pro]

How does the adoption of blockchain in auditing firms enhance the practices of Chartered Accountants?

Introduction: In recent years, the accounting and auditing landscape has undergone a transformative shift with the integration of blockchain technology. Blockchain, the decentralized and transparent ledger system that underlies cryptocurrencies, has found its way into various industries, and auditing firms are no exception. This exploration aims to highlight how the adoption of blockchain in…

[labourlawsinindia]

Automated Labour Law Audits and Compliance Software — SEAL

Simpliance’s revolutionary automated statutory audit platform driven by AI & Machine Learning technology is helping companies reduce costs by 50% while conducting 100% audit checks of all records submitted and exponentially increasing audit speed.

INTELLIGENT TECHNOLOGY

First of its kind AI & Machine Learning driven audit platform in India enabling compliance at a click

100% EMPLOYEE RECORDS CHECKED

Automated engine, checking 100% records on all high-risk audit points of labour compliance

VARYING PAYROLL INPUT FORMATS

Capable of analysing varying payroll input formats from different softwares

INTEGRATED REGISTER GENERATION

Automated state-wise statutory register generation; PAN India under all applicable laws

Book your FREE DEMO now!

[mostlysignssomeportents]

Lina Khan’s future is the future of the Democratic Party — and America

On OCTOBER 23 at 7PM, I'll be in DECATUR, presenting my novel THE BEZZLE at EAGLE EYE BOOKS.

On the one hand, the anti-monopoly movement has a future no matter who wins the 2024 election – that's true even if Kamala Harris wins but heeds the calls from billionaire donors to fire Lina Khan and her fellow trustbusters.

In part, that's because US antitrust laws have broad "private rights of action" that allow individuals and companies to sue one another for monopolistic conduct, even if top government officials are turning a blind eye. It's true that from the Reagan era to the Biden era, these private suits were few and far between, and the cases that were brought often died in a federal courtroom. But the past four years has seen a resurgence of antitrust rage that runs from left to right, and from individuals to the C-suites of big companies, driving a wave of private cases that are prevailing in the courts, upending the pro-monopoly precedents that billionaires procured by offering free "continuing education" antitrust training to 40% of the Federal judiciary:

https://pluralistic.net/2021/08/13/post-bork-era/#manne-down

It's amazing to see the DoJ racking up huge wins against Google's monopolistic conduct, sure, but first blood went to Epic, who won a historic victory over Google in federal court six months before the DoJ's win, which led to the court ordering Google to open up its app store:

https://www.theverge.com/policy/2024/10/7/24243316/epic-google-permanent-injunction-ruling-third-party-stores

Google's 30% App Tax is a giant drag on all kinds of sectors, as is its veto over which software Android users get to see, so Epic's win is going to dramatically alter the situation for all kinds of activities, from beleaguered indie game devs:

https://antiidlereborn.com/news/

To the entire news sector:

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2023/06/save-news-we-must-open-app-stores

Private antitrust cases have attracted some very surprising plaintiffs, like Michael Jordan, whose long policy of apoliticism crumbled once he bought a NASCAR team and lived through the monopoly abuses of sports leagues as an owner, not a player:

https://www.thebignewsletter.com/p/michael-jordan-anti-monopolist

A much weirder and more unlikely antitrust plaintiff than Michael Jordan is Google, the perennial antitrust defendant. Google has brought a complaint against Microsoft in the EU, based on Microsoft's extremely ugly monopolistic cloud business:

https://www.reuters.com/technology/google-files-complaint-eu-over-microsoft-cloud-practices-2024-09-25/

Google's choice of venue here highlights another reason to think that the antitrust surge will continue irrespective of US politics: antitrust is global. Antitrust fervor has seized governments from the UK to the EU to South Korea to Japan. All of those countries have extremely similar antitrust laws, because they all had their statute books overhauled by US technocrats as part of the Marshall Plan, so they have the same statutory tools as the American trustbusters who dismantled Standard Oil and AT&T, and who are making ready to shatter Google into several competing businesses:

https://www.theverge.com/2024/10/8/24265832/google-search-antitrust-remedies-framework-android-chrome-play

Antitrust fever has spread to Canada, Australia, and even China, where the Cyberspace Directive bans Chinese tech giants from breaking interoperability to freeze out Chinese startups. Anything that can't go on forever eventually stops, and the cost of 40 years of pro-monopoly can't be ignored. Monopolies make the whole world more brittle, even as the cost of that brittleness mounts. It's hard to pretend monopolies are fine when a single hurricane can wipe out the entire country's supply of IV fluid – again:

https://prospect.org/health/2024-10-11-cant-believe-im-writing-about-iv-fluid-again/

What's more, the conduct of global monopolists is the same in every country where they have taken hold, which means that trustbusters in the EU can use the UK Digital Markets Unit's report on the mobile app market as a roadmap for their enforcement actions against Apple:

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/63f61bc0d3bf7f62e8c34a02/Mobile_Ecosystems_Final_Report_amended_2.pdf

And then the South Korean and Japanese trustbusters can translate the court documents from the EU's enforcement action and use them to score victories over Apple in their own courts:

https://pluralistic.net/2024/04/10/an-injury-to-one/#is-an-injury-to-all

So on the one hand, the trustbusting wave will continue erode the foundations of global monopolies, no matter what happens after this election. But on the other hand, if Harris wins and then fires Biden's top trustbusters to appease her billionaire donors, things are going to get ugly.

A new, excellent long-form Bloomberg article by Josh Eidelson and Max Chafkin gives a sense of the battle raging just below the surface of the Democratic Power, built around a superb interview with Khan herself:

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2024-10-09/lina-khan-on-a-second-ftc-term-ai-price-gouging-data-privacy

The article begins with a litany of tech billionaires who've gone an all-out, public assault on Khan's leadership – billionaires who stand to personally lose hundreds of millions of dollars from her agency's principled, vital antitrust work, but who cloak their objection to Khan in rhetoric about defending the American economy. In public, some of these billionaires are icily polite, but many of them degenerate into frothing, toddler-grade name-calling, like IAB's Barry Diller, who called her a "dope" and Musk lickspittle Jason Calacanis, who called her an all-caps COMMUNIST and a LUNATIC.

The overall vibe from these wreckers? "How dare the FTC do things?!"

And you know, they have a point. For decades, the FTC was – in the quoted words of Tim Wu – "a very hardworking agency that did nothing." This was the period when the FTC targeted low-level scammers while turning a blind eye to the monsters that were devouring the US economy. In part, that was because the FTC had been starved of budget, trapping them in a cycle of racking up easy, largely pointless "wins" against penny-ante grifters to justify their existence, but never to the extent that Congress would apportion them the funds to tackle the really serious cases (if this sounds familiar, it's also the what happened during the long period when the IRS chased middle class taxpayers over minor filing errors, while ignoring the billionaires and giant corporations that engaged in 7- and 8-figure tax scams).

But the FTC wasn't merely underfunded: it was timid. The FTC has extremely broad enforcement and rulemaking powers, which most sat dormant during the neoliberal era:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/01/10/the-courage-to-govern/#whos-in-charge

The Biden administration didn't merely increase the FTC's funding: in choosing Khan to helm the organization, they brought onboard a skilled technician, who was both well-versed in the extensive but unused powers of the agency and determined to use them:

https://pluralistic.net/2022/10/18/administrative-competence/#i-know-stuff

But Khan's didn't just rely on technical chops and resources to begin the de-olicharchification of the US economy: she built a three-legged stool, whose third leg is narrative. Khan's signature is her in-person and remote "listening tours," where workers who've been harmed by corporate power get to tell their stories. Bloomberg recounts the story of Deborah Brantley, who was sexually harassed and threatened by her bosses at Kavasutra North Palm Beach. Brantley's bosses touched her inappropriately and "joked" about drugging her and raping her so she "won’t be such a bitch and then maybe people would like you more."

When Brantley finally quit and took a job bartending at a different business, Kavasutra sued her over her noncompete clause, alleging an "irreparable injury" sustained by having one of their former employees working at another business, seeking damages and fees.

The vast majority of the 30 million American workers who labor under noncompetes are like Brantley, low-waged service workers, especially at fast-food restaurants (so Wendy's franchisees can stop minimum wage cashiers from earning $0.25/hour more flipping burgers at a nearby McDonald's). The donor-class indenturers who defend noncompetes claim that noncompetes are necessary to protect "innovative" businesses from losing their "IP." But of course, the one state where no workers are subject to noncompetes is California, which bans them outright – the state that is also home to Silicon Valley, an IP-heave industry that the same billionaires laud for its innovations.

After that listening tour, Khan's FTC banned noncompetes nationwide:

https://pluralistic.net/2024/04/25/capri-v-tapestry/#aiming-at-dollars-not-men

Only to have a federal judge in Texas throw out their ban, a move that will see $300b/year transfered from workers to shareholders, and block the formation of 8,500 new US businesses every year:

https://www.npr.org/2024/08/21/g-s1-18376/federal-judge-tosses-ftc-noncompetes-ban

Notwithstanding court victories like Epic v Google and DoJ v Google, America's oligarchs have the courts on their side, thanks to decades of court-packing planned by the Federalist Society and executed by Senate Republicans and Reagan, Bush I, Bush II, and Trump. Khan understands this; she told Bloomberg that she's a "close student" of the tactics Reagan used to transform American society, admiring his effectiveness while hating his results. Like other transformative presidents, good and bad, Reagan had to fight the judiciary and entrenched institutions (as did FDR and Lincoln). Erasing Reagan's legacy is a long-term project, a battle of inches that will involve mustering broad political support for the cause of a freer, more equal America.

Neither Biden nor Khan are responsible for the groundswell of US – and global – movement to euthanize our rentier overlords. This is a moment whose time has come; a fact demonstrated by the tens of thousands of working Americans who filled the FTC's noncompete docket with outraged comments. People understand that corporate looters – not "the economy" or "the forces of history" – are the reason that the businesses where they worked and shopped were destroyed by private equity goons who amassed intergenerational, dynastic fortunes by strip-mining the real economy and leaving behind rubble.

Like the billionaires publicly demanding that Harris fire Khan, private equity bosses can't stop making tone-deaf, guillotine-conjuring pronouncements about their own virtue and the righteousness of their businesses. They don't just want to destroy the world - they want to be praised for it:/p>

"Private equity’s been a great thing for America" -Stephen Pagliuca, co-chairman of Bain Capital;

"We are taught to judge the success of a society by how it deals with the least able, most vulnerable members of that society. Shouldn’t we judge a society by how they treat the most successful? Do we vilify, tax, expropriate and condemn those who have succeeded, or do we celebrate economic success as the engine that propels our society toward greater collective well-being?" -Marc Rowan, CEO of Apollo

"Achieve life-changing money and power," -Sachin Khajuria, former partner at Apollo

Meanwhile, the "buy, strip and flip" model continues to chew its way through America. When PE buys up all the treatment centers for kids with behavioral problems, they hack away at staffing and oversight, turning them into nightmares where kids are routinely abused, raped and murdered:

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/they-told-me-it-was-going-be-good-place-allega-tions-n987176

When PE buys up nursing homes, the same thing happens, with elderly residents left to sit in their own excrement and then die:

https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2023/12/24/nursing-homes-private-equity-fraud-00132001

Writing in The Guardian, Alex Blasdel lays out the case for private equity as a kind of virus that infects economies, parasitically draining them of not just the capacity to provide goods and services, but also of the ability to govern themselves, as politicians and regulators are captured by the unfathomable sums that PE flushes into the political process:

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2024/oct/10/slash-and-burn-is-private-equity-out-of-control

Now, the average worker who's just lost their job may not understand "divi recaps" or "2-and-20" or "carried interest tax loopholes," but they do understand that something is deeply rotten in the world today.

What happens to that understanding is a matter of politics. The Republicans – firmly affiliated with, and beloved of, the wreckers – have chosen an easy path to capitalizing on the rising rage. All they need to do is convince the public that the system is irredeemably corrupt and that the government can't possibly fix anything (hence Reagan's asinine "joke": "the nine most terrifying words in the English language are: 'I'm from the Government, and I'm here to help'").

This is a very canny strategy. If you are the party of "governments are intrinsically corrupt and incompetent," then governing corruptly and incompetently proves your point. The GOP strategy is to create a nation of enraged nihilists who don't even imagine that the government could do something to hold their bosses to account – not for labor abuses, not for pollution, not for wage theft or bribery.

The fact that successive neoliberal governments – including Democratic administrations – acted time and again to bear out this hypothesis makes it easy for this kind of nihilism to take hold.

Far-right conspiracies about pharma bosses colluding with corrupt FDA officials to poison us with vaccines for profit owe their success to the lived experience of millions of Americans who lost loved ones to a conspiracy between pharma bosses and corrupt officials to poison us with opioids.

Unhinged beliefs that "they" caused the hurricanes tearing through Florida and Georgia and that Kamala Harris is capping compensation to people who lost their homes are only credible because of murderous Republican fumble during Katrina; and the larcenous collusion of Democrats to help banks steal Americans' homes during the foreclosure crisis, when Obama took Tim Geithner's advice to "foam the runway" with the mortgages of everyday Americans who'd been cheated by their banks:

https://www.salon.com/2014/05/14/this_man_made_millions_suffer_tim_geithners_sorry_legacy_on_housing/

If Harris gives in to billionaire donors and fires Khan and her fellow trustbusters, paving the way for more looting and scamming, the result will be more nihilism, which is to say, more electoral victories for the GOP. The "government can't do anything" party already exists. There are no votes to be gained by billing yourself as the "we also think governments can't do anything" party.

In other words, a world where Khan doesn't run the FTC is a world where antitrust continues to gain ground, but without taking Democrats with it. It's a world where nihilism wins.

There's factions of the Democratic Party who understand this. AOC warned party leaders that, "Anyone goes near Lina Khan and there will be an out and out brawl":

https://twitter.com/AOC/status/1844034727935988155

And Bernie Sanders called her "the best FTC Chair in modern history":

https://twitter.com/SenSanders/status/1843733298960576652

In other words: Lina Khan as a posse.

Tor Books as just published two new, free LITTLE BROTHER stories: VIGILANT, about creepy surveillance in distance education; and SPILL, about oil pipelines and indigenous landback.

If you'd like an essay-formatted version of this post to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:

https://pluralistic.net/2024/10/11/democracys-antitrust-paradox/#there-will-be-an-out-and-out-brawl

[savvyhrms8]

The Growing Need for Statutory Software in Modern Workplaces

In today's competitive environment, staying legally compliant has never been more essential. All businesses, including ones with a single employee, are required to keep records, provide reports and follow rules with the ongoing challenge of intelligence related to statutory documents and legislation. This is where statutory software comes in.

Statutory Compliance software provides an online system to help organizations manage the complex reporting requirements of law and regulations. This can be anything from employee or contractor pay deductions and reporting tax returns, to produce compliance reports. A statutory system allows an entity to reduce the opportunity for error and the risk of missing deadlines. While it is possible for organizations to perform these calculations, if they neglect even one of the many potential errors or deadlines, it could have potentially significant consequences such as penalties, regular and incidental audits, or criminal lawsuits.

Statutory software offers significant advantages for businesses, one of which is time savings. Instead of spending hours working by hand, with the correct system statutory reporting can be done in a few mouse clicks. It is clear that the time savings allows your HR or finance department more time realizing the potential and opportunities to take advantage of working with accurate and up-to-date information.

Law and tax structures are regularly changing. Tracking all of these changes can be incredibly difficult, if not impossible. An effective statutory software package will automatically update to reflect new laws helping organizations stay ahead of compliance issues.

Statutory software is not a luxury for businesses; it is a substantive requirement to run a compliant and lawful organization.

[savvyhrms01]

Why Businesses Should Never Ignore Statutory Compliance.

Nobody ever launches a business with an eye towards paperwork, legal requirements, or government regulations, let's face it. However, you cannot afford to overlook statutory compliance software if you want your business to thrive.

What is it, then? Statutory compliance, to put it simply, refers to treating and managing your employees in accordance with the laws and regulations established by the government. This covers things like pay, taxes, working hours, health benefits, and so forth.

Why Is It So Important?

Legal matters may seem like a low priority when you're occupied with overseeing teams, clients, and daily goals. However, it only takes one mistake to get into trouble—fines, court documents, even losing

Why Statutory Compliance Should Never Be an Afterthought in Business

Let’s be honest—no one starts a business dreaming about paperwork, legal formalities, or government regulations. But if you want your company to survive and grow, statutory compliance isn't something you can afford to ignore.

So, what is it exactly? In simple words, a statutory compliance system means following the laws and rules set by the government when it comes to how you treat and manage your employees. That includes salaries, taxes, working hours, health benefits, and so on.

Why Does It Matter So Much?

When you're busy managing clients, teams, and daily targets, legal stuff might seem like a low priority. But it only takes one wrong step to land in trouble—penalties, legal notices, even loss of reputation.

Here’s why staying compliant actually helps:

Keeps You Safe Legally

If your business follows the rules, you're far less likely to get into legal messes. It’s that simple.

Builds Employee Trust

People want to work for companies that are fair. When employees know you’re deducting PF, offering proper leave, and giving timely salaries, they respect that.

Avoids Financial Loss

Fines, back-payments, or lawsuits can cost way more than just doing things right from the start.

Peace of Mind

You can focus on growing your business, knowing you're not missing some important rule that could come back to bite you later.

A Few Typical Areas of Compliance

You will have to deal with different regulations depending on your location and industry. However, in general, you'll need to keep an eye on the following:

Provident Fund (PF)

State Insurance for Employees (ESI)

Professional Tax

Minimum Wages

Bonus and Gratuity

Maternity Leave

Shops and Establishments Regulations

Real Talk: Why Businesses Struggle With This Most small businesses don’t ignore laws because they want to cheat—they just don’t have the right systems in place. Maybe they’re not aware of the latest rules, or maybe they rely on outdated methods.

It can also get confusing. One regulation says this, another says that. And with changes happening every few months, it’s hard to keep up.

So, What Can You Do?

You don’t need to be a legal expert. But you do need someone—or something—that helps you stay on track. Many businesses now use software to track compliance deadlines, generate reports, and manage payroll and taxes properly.

And even if you're doing things manually, at least make sure you’ve got a checklist. Talk to a compliance consultant if needed. It’s better to ask early than pay later.

Final Thoughts

Running a business is tough enough already. Don't allow what you've created to be destroyed by a missed form or a late payment. Not only is statutory compliance required by law, but it is also a component of being a conscientious employer.

Remain informed, maintain openness, and approach it as if it were an essential component of your business. It’s not just about rules. It’s about doing right by your people—and protecting your business in the long run.

[myndsolution1]

Steps to Implement Statutory Compliance Software

Statutory compliance refers to a predetermined set of guidelines that are derived from the legal framework and specify the boundaries that organisations have to operate within. There are many compliance areas, including:

Labour law compliance

Direct tax compliance

Indirect tax compliance

Non-compliance with any of these can lead to risks such as financial risks and loss of reputation.

Therefore, it becomes important to adhere to these guidelines; however, there are many challenges that come along:

[mariacallous]

Democrats on the House Oversight Committee fired off two dozen requests Wednesday morning pressing federal agency leaders for information about plans to install AI software throughout federal agencies amid the ongoing cuts to the government's workforce.

The barrage of inquiries follow recent reporting by WIRED and The Washington Post concerning efforts by Elon Musk’s so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) to automate tasks with a variety of proprietary AI tools and access sensitive data.

“The American people entrust the federal government with sensitive personal information related to their health, finances, and other biographical information on the basis that this information will not be disclosed or improperly used without their consent,” the requests read, “including through the use of an unapproved and unaccountable third-party AI software.”

The requests, first obtained by WIRED, are signed by Gerald Connolly, a Democratic congressman from Virginia.

The central purpose of the requests is to press the agencies into demonstrating that any potential use of AI is legal and that steps are being taken to safeguard Americans’ private data. The Democrats also want to know whether any use of AI will financially benefit Musk, who founded xAI and whose troubled electric car company, Tesla, is working to pivot toward robotics and AI. The Democrats are further concerned, Connolly says, that Musk could be using his access to sensitive government data for personal enrichment, leveraging the data to “supercharge” his own proprietary AI model, known as Grok.

In the requests, Connolly notes that federal agencies are “bound by multiple statutory requirements in their use of AI software,” pointing chiefly to the Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program, which works to standardize the government’s approach to cloud services and ensure AI-based tools are properly assessed for security risks. He also points to the Advancing American AI Act, which requires federal agencies to “prepare and maintain an inventory of the artificial intelligence use cases of the agency,” as well as “make agency inventories available to the public.”

Documents obtained by WIRED last week show that DOGE operatives have deployed a proprietary chatbot called GSAi to approximately 1,500 federal workers. The GSA oversees federal government properties and supplies information technology services to many agencies.

A memo obtained by WIRED reporters shows employees have been warned against feeding the software any controlled unclassified information. Other agencies, including the departments of Treasury and Health and Human Services, have considered using a chatbot, though not necessarily GSAi, according to documents viewed by WIRED.

WIRED has also reported that the United States Army is currently using software dubbed CamoGPT to scan its records systems for any references to diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility. An Army spokesperson confirmed the existence of the tool but declined to provide further information about how the Army plans to use it.

In the requests, Connolly writes that the Department of Education possesses personally identifiable information on more than 43 million people tied to federal student aid programs. “Due to the opaque and frenetic pace at which DOGE seems to be operating,” he writes, “I am deeply concerned that students’, parents’, spouses’, family members’ and all other borrowers’ sensitive information is being handled by secretive members of the DOGE team for unclear purposes and with no safeguards to prevent disclosure or improper, unethical use.” The Washington Post previously reported that DOGE had begun feeding sensitive federal data drawn from record systems at the Department of Education to analyze its spending.

Education secretary Linda McMahon said Tuesday that she was proceeding with plans to fire more than a thousand workers at the department, joining hundreds of others who accepted DOGE “buyouts” last month. The Education Department has lost nearly half of its workforce—the first step, McMahon says, in fully abolishing the agency.

“The use of AI to evaluate sensitive data is fraught with serious hazards beyond improper disclosure,” Connolly writes, warning that “inputs used and the parameters selected for analysis may be flawed, errors may be introduced through the design of the AI software, and staff may misinterpret AI recommendations, among other concerns.”

He adds: “Without clear purpose behind the use of AI, guardrails to ensure appropriate handling of data, and adequate oversight and transparency, the application of AI is dangerous and potentially violates federal law.”

[brookspayrolleor]

EOR Companies in India: Why Brookspayroll is Your Ideal Partner for Global Hiring

As global hiring continues to evolve, Employer of Record (EOR) services have become a game-changer for companies looking to expand into new markets without the burden of setting up a legal entity. For businesses targeting the fast-growing Indian talent pool, choosing the right EOR company in India is crucial.

Among the leading names in this space, Brookspayroll stands out as one of the most trusted and efficient EOR companies in India, offering comprehensive solutions that are both scalable and compliant.

What is an EOR and Why Do You Need One in India?

An Employer of Record (EOR) is a third-party organization that legally employs workers on your behalf. This means the EOR handles:

Employment contracts and onboarding

Local labor law compliance

Payroll and tax management

Statutory benefits and insurance

Termination and exit procedures

For companies expanding into India, using an EOR enables you to hire top talent without establishing a local entity. It’s faster, cost-effective, and reduces compliance risks.

Brookspayroll: Among the Top EOR Companies in India

Brookspayroll is a leading provider of EOR services in India, known for its accuracy, efficiency, and personalized HR support. Here's why companies worldwide trust Brookspayroll:

✅ 100% Legal Compliance

Brookspayroll ensures your hiring and HR operations fully comply with Indian labor laws, including PF, ESI, gratuity, income tax, and more.

✅ Fast and Flexible Hiring

Hire Indian employees in a matter of days. Brookspayroll provides ready-to-go infrastructure for fast onboarding — no red tape, no delays.

✅ Customized EOR Solutions

From full-time employees to remote workers and contractors, Brookspayroll tailors its EOR services based on your specific needs.

✅ Transparent Pricing

No hidden charges or unexpected fees. Brookspayroll offers clear and competitive pricing for all EOR services.

✅ Local Expertise + Global Standards

Brookspayroll combines deep local labor law expertise with global best practices, making it a perfect fit for international businesses.

Key Benefits of Partnering with Brookspayroll EOR Services in India

Hiring through Brookspayroll gives you:

🌐 Global Expansion Without Entity Setup

🧾 Simplified Payroll and Tax Filing

🛡️ Risk Mitigation and Legal Protection

🧑‍💼 HR and Benefits Administration

📈 Focus on Business, Not Bureaucracy

Whether you're a startup, mid-sized company, or enterprise, Brookspayroll’s EOR services in India streamline your hiring and ensure long-term stability.

Who Should Use EOR Services in India?

Brookspayroll's EOR services are ideal for:

International companies hiring Indian employees remotely

Startups testing the Indian market

Enterprises needing quick team scaling

Organizations without a registered business in India

By taking on the role of the legal employer, Brookspayroll allows you to operate compliantly and flexibly, while maintaining full control over your employees’ day-to-day work.

Industries Served by Brookspayroll

Brookspayroll serves a wide range of industries through its EOR platform:

IT and Software Development

Digital Marketing and Design

Finance and Consulting

E-commerce and Retail

Health and Wellness

Engineering and Manufacturing

Their tailored approach ensures sector-specific compliance and workforce strategies.

Why Brookspayroll is Among the Best EOR Companies in India

As one of the most reliable EOR companies in India, Brookspayroll offers:

✅ Local presence with national reach

✅ Expert team of HR, legal, and compliance professionals

✅ Advanced HR tech tools for seamless employee management

✅ 24/7 customer support

Brookspayroll doesn’t just handle employment — it empowers global businesses to scale efficiently in India.

Start Hiring in India Today with Brookspayroll

If you’re looking for a trusted partner to hire Indian talent quickly and compliantly, Brookspayroll is the go-to EOR company in India. Their end-to-end EOR solutions simplify the process of entering the Indian market while ensuring full compliance and transparency.

🔗 Contact Brookspayroll today to learn how we can support your global hiring goals!

[spkauditors]

Choose SPK Auditors and Accountants for Zoho Creator Implementation in UAE!

Get professional advice and efficient implementation of Zoho Creator. Contact SPK today! Contact now +971558572143