#stochastic indicator

[stochastiz]

possibly the last few embellishments for my liveshow shirt! arbys and desert flower bowling alley and arcade fun complex shrinky dink pins, some quote patches, and the icon on the "be the cryptid you want to see in the world" shirt they sell

now to sew everything on...

[allaboutforexworld]

Momentum Trading: Forex Trading Strategy Explained

Momentum trading is a strategy that seeks to capitalize on the continuance of existing trends in the market. By focusing on the strength of price movements, traders can make informed decisions and optimize their profits. What is Momentum Trading? Momentum trading involves buying and selling currency pairs based on recent price trends. The core idea is that strong movements in the market tend to…

[truedatafinancialpvtltd]

[crypto28ro]

Stochastic, SMI și Stochastic RSI: Ghid Complet pentru Identificarea Condițiilor Extreme și a Schimbărilor de Trend

Stochastic, SMI și Stochastic RSI: Ghid Complet pentru Identificarea Condițiilor Extreme și a Schimbărilor de Trend Introducere În analiza tehnică, indicatorii de momentum joacă un rol esențial în evaluarea condițiilor pieței și în identificarea momentelor de inversare a trendului. Trei dintre cei mai populari indicatori care se bazează pe conceptul de stochastic sunt Stochastic Oscillator,…

[stockmarketdailyupdates]

Learn how to combine RSI and Stochastic indicators to create a powerful trading strategy. Discover tips for identifying overbought/oversold levels, timing entries, exits, and maximizing profits.

[definedge99]

"Mastering the Stochastic RSI Indicator: A Powerful Tool for Momentum and Trend Analysis"

The Stochastic RSI (StochRSI) is a momentum oscillator combining the Relative Strength Index (RSI) and the Stochastic Oscillator. It measures RSI's position relative to its range over time, helping identify overbought/oversold conditions and potential market reversals.

[tinchungkhoan24h]

Chỉ báo Stochastic là gì?

Stochastic là chỉ báo động lượng, hỗ trợ người dùng so sánh giá trong một phạm vi với một khoản thời gian nhất định. Stochastic ra đời vào năm 1950 và hiện tại vẫn còn được sử dụng. Để nhận tín hiệu về giá và xu hướng chính xác nhất, nên kết hợp Stochastic cùng một số chỉ báo kỹ thuật khác, như RSI và các mô hình nến. Hiện tại, một số nền tảng giao dịch tích hợp Stochastic để nhà đầu tư dễ dàng sử dụng. Xem chi tiết tại: https://s.net.vn/32OS

#seiofva #stochastic #indicator

[a-very-tired-jew]

Watching people use the same rhetoric as far right MAGA and QAnon types to defend protestors using rhetoric from recognized terrorist groups, justifying said terrorists’ actions, and distributing their materials has been something else.

Y’all do realize you’re using the same goalposting, sealioning, gymnastics that the far right has used and continues to use to justify their bigotry and actions, right?

The same cries of “First Amendment rights!” have been used to justify right wing transphobic rhetoric on college campuses just as its being used to justify and defend college protestors and rhetoric from terrorist groups.

In the former situation many people will point to the harm that said rhetoric does, how i has (and continues to) contribute and/or influence stochastic against trans individuals and people (as a whole). We recognize the actors that contribute to this and object to their presence and actions.

Conversely, an individual and group actively handing out terrorist approved and produced materials is a form of support according to USA Law (especially when it comes to foreign nationals on visas and green cards). When you endorse these groups, use their same rhetoric, and distribute their materials then your speech is no longer protected.

Defending it as such is the same as the MAGA and QAnon folk defending the rhetoric of people causing stochastic terrorism, but with even more legal precedent and standing.

Objecting to one but not the other indicates that you do not understand the law as much as you claim, hold double standards, and want “laws for thee, but not for me” standards that are hypocritical.

We can object to ICE, the Trump Admin, and everything all we want. But if you want to claim rule of law and the laws surrounding certain Rights, then it is paramount that you understand them else you just sound ignorant.

[mammalianmammals]

The importance of small-island populations for the long-term survival of endangered large-bodied insular mammals

Sabhrina Gita Aninta, Rosie Drinkwater, Alberto Carmagnini, and Laurent Frantz

Abstract

Island populations of large vertebrates have experienced higher extinction rates than mainland populations over long timescales due to demographic stochasticity, genetic drift, and inbreeding. While being more susceptible to extinction and as such potentially targeted for conservation interventions such as genetic rescue, small-island populations can experience relatively less anthropogenic habitat degradation than those on larger islands. Here, we determine the consequences and conservation implications of long-term isolation and recent human activities on genetic diversity of island populations of two forest-dependent mammals endemic to the Wallacea archipelago: the anoa (Bubalus spp.) and babirusa (Babyrousa spp.). Using genomic analyses and habitat suitability models, we show that, compared to closely related species, populations on mainland Sulawesi exhibit low heterozygosity, high inbreeding, a high proportion of deleterious alleles, and experience a high rate of anthropogenic disturbance. In contrast, populations on smaller islands occupy higher-quality habitats, possess fewer deleterious mutations despite exhibiting lower heterozygosity and higher inbreeding. Site frequency spectra indicate that these patterns reflect stronger, long-term purging in smaller-island populations. Our results thus suggest that conservation efforts should focus on protecting small-island high-quality habitats and avoiding translocations from mainland populations. This study highlights the crucial role of small offshore islands for the long-term survival of Wallacea’s iconic and indigenous mammals in the face of development on the mainland.

Read the Paper Here:

https://www.pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.2422690122

[utilitycaster]

But wouldn't you say that at least the fandom experience during c3 was a lot nicer than during c2? I mean, the characters all got along immediately so no room for unnecessary drama and no ship wars, I heard it was really toxic during c2 so I'm glad that c3 had none of it.

Anon, the polite answer to this that assumes you are very new to this fandom and blog and also, if I'm being honest, reality, is "No." Drama in a fandom is largely decoupled from whether the characters actually get along on screen (much like "I wish these characters would talk" is often decoupled from them actually talking and much more about whether they're talking about the thing OP wants them to talk about). More importantly, Campaign 3 had something far stupider and more unkind and insidious than ship wars, which is people harassing you for saying a ship simply wasn't very interesting. I would also say that one of the loudest voices in the area of fans who defend Campaign 3 claiming it's more toxic is specifically speaking about their very individual Twitter experience which I do not think is indicative of the larger fandom. I do think that C2 had more fans harassing the cast on Twitter, which on the one hand is far worse behavior; but it also kind of meant that the fandom on Tumblr, while not without ship warring, was somewhat quieter. I will also acknowledge that my own personal experience is heavily colored by the fact that I was new to the fandom in C2 and so did not have a significant following until late in the game, but Campaign 3 was rife with people who, as best as I can tell, serially show up to fandoms and attack whoever they perceive as popular, sometimes genuinely popular people and sometimes it's just someone who can eloquently string together meta they disagree with, and then when you hit back go "I'm just a little guy just a little birthday boy you're so MEAN." On Tumblr, at least, toxic C2 fans were easy to stop and frankly only turned post-hiatus and many of them prided themselves on not posting hate in the main tag (and quit the fandom altogether); toxic C3 fans have the tenacity and intellect of the average cockroach.

The real answer is: HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA what PRIMORDIAL ROCK have you been under. Even if you believe everything the serial liar I suspect you are listening to said about C2 drama how did you miss ALL of C3 drama, especially on like, my blog specifically, as an initially unwilling participant who eventually, as discussed below, decided that if these wretched stochastic parrot morons wouldn't leave me alone I may as well pull out the metaphorical shotgun and make starting shit with me as unpleasant an experience as possible.

Look, I'm not going to pull up my posts in which I've called people by name since I don't think you will care and/or will consider those unnecessary drama, despite the genuine erosion I believe they have committed towards the quality of discourse through their bigotry, and lack of intellectual rigor, empathy, or ability to criticize things through any lens other than false accusations of the Leftist Epithet Du Jour (eg: calling Delilah Briarwood a colonizer, which is simply untrue). But also, starting from barely 6 months into Campaign 3 and continuing through the end, ie, this is three years now.

I personally got hate for saying "It is valid for Imogen to be mad at Laudna for breaking the gnarlrock, and moreover, I feel like Laudna is given more leeway for her behavior than almost any other past character" to the point that someone joined Tumblr only to block me and then stalk me and post about me in the discourse tag.

That eventually came to a head when they called me out by name for replying to a response on a post I had originally made in which I said "Imogen's powers aren't a good metaphor for queerness in that her lack of control actually causes real problems for other people," a statement that a lot of Imogen and Laudna shippers and fans are still to this day throwing fits about despite it being over two years ago.

Multiple people, including people who had lost friends or relatives young and at least one cancer survivor, were sent outright death threats for saying nothing harsher "I think the story is interesting if Laudna remains dead." Now, I was only a lurker when Molly died, and I know people quit or were mad and harassed the cast on Twitter, but the worst I saw on Tumblr were people either quitting, or being weird and annoying about prioritizing Molly over the captured party members and later being kind of dismissive of Caduceus as "temporary".

I was repeatedly harassed to the point of at least two individuals making multiple alternate accounts to reblog my posts or send hate to me and just random people who had interacted with said posts for saying "I don't think Imogen and Laudna is a very good ship"; while we're at it, ship wars are something I dislike but expect in fandom, but I cannot stress how fucking wretched a subset of Im/odna shippers were to the point that to this day they look at people who created genuine content and meta for a competing ship that was always tiny in comparison and have decided it was done purely out of bitterness.

In general, there was just an utter incapacity among many C3 fans to accept "I don't care for your blorbo/ship/campaign" as a post on one's own blog. I was talking with some like-minded friends yesterday and to this day, over a month and a half after the campaign ended, actually a decent amount of people who liked Campaign 3 have almost identical criticisms (pacing, not following on a number of character centric-threads, lack of inter-character interactions, a resolution that is intriguing but was poorly set up, cutaways to other parties at inopportune times, and generally the campaign feeling like they put out all the ingredients on the table and said "here's a finished cake.") but it's fine if they say it, because they preface it with "I loved Campaign 3 and Bells Hells, but." In the end a lot of C3 fans will just attack if you don't think Bells Hells are great and the best. Again I am not naming names but there are even multiple people who openly prefer Campaign 2 by a margin but avoid this criticism simply by being like "Campaign 3 is also really really good, although [same list of criticisms I have]"; see lack of intellectual rigor and analysis. I think it's actually a very simple split: C2 is my favorite because the campaign allowed the characters so much leeway to interact and change and grow that they became my blorbos, whereas I would have liked to have liked BH more but the campaign was ill-suited for them and they didn't really talk.

At least Campaign 2 people wanted their stuff to be canon, and threw fits because it wasn't. Campaign 3 people are like BUT THE 20 HOUR SUPERCUT?????? and cannot accept that they have a canon ship that some people find dull or a blorbo some people think isn't a great person. If someone is mad about not getting something in the story, that's fandom as usual, it's irritating but it's life. Many campaign 3 fans cannot tolerate a whisper of dissent with their opinions without shitting themselves and making it everyone's problem. I know multiple people whom I followed during Campaign 2 for their meta who straight up stopped writing it because if you said anything even mildly critical of Campaign 3 you'd get hate. Campaign 2 harassment on Tumblr was something that largely ended shortly after story beats that proved one person right; Campaign 3 harassment was unending unless you either bow to the people sending it and say "I'm sorry for saying anything other than that your blorbo and ship is perfect," stop posting, or, and I'm really the only person who took this route, make it clear that you can and will hit back ten times harder.

So no: I found the Campaign 3 fandom on Tumblr specifically uniquely toxic because it fell outside of normal fandom toxicity. I think Campaign 2 toxic fans were deeply shitty, but they largely left and I think their unpleasantness is mostly confined to a fandom space and did not degrade the conversation; I think at least some Campaign 3 toxic fans are both genuinely stupid and genuinely bad people who are a negative influence on the fandom at large and I hope we recover during a hypothetical C4; I am cautiously optimistic if only because I think on the basis of mutual blocking they have largely self-selected out and will exist in their own weird echo chamber.

I will also note at this point my criticism of Campaign 3 is almost entirely untagged both as discourse and main and almost entirely either reblogs, or in response to asks such as this one. To be transparent, while I'm sure some critiques will arise as I work through my C2 rewatch I plan on keeping them again, untagged such that only followers, people who follow people who reblog such critiques (not many, I usually get mostly likes on those), and people looking at my blog specifically. I think it will taper off, particularly since a lot of C3 fans had little interest in anything else CR has done.

And finally: again speaking only for myself I'd rather have a brilliant campaign with a toxic fandom, where I can minimally participate in the fandom by reblogging posts I like and enjoy myself with a great show and a handful of likeminded fans in a discord (indeed this is kind of what I do for Veilguard), than a mediocre campaign with a delightful fandom. As demonstrated "it's eh but the people are nice" is not, for me, a defense of Campaign 3 but further condemnation of its quality, and then the people weren't even nice and were in fact in my estimation far worse than those from Campaign 2.

Anyway: I just want to put this out there but I am vanishingly unlikely to be swayed on anything by an anonymous ask. If you want to actually have a chance you better be saying what you say with your whole chest. But also, this is just. Extremely wrong, and you have a very incorrect read on what I personally value in addition to having a poor understanding of the CR fandom history on Tumblr but another problem about the C3 fandom? I got a lot of asks like this one where I cannot tell if the person is just naive to the point of not even realizing how little they know, or if they're trying to be manipulative but are exceedingly bad at it.

[allaboutforexworld]

10 Forex Strategies for Scalping

Scalping is a popular trading strategy in the forex market, characterized by short-term trades aimed at capturing small price movements. This strategy requires quick decision-making, discipline, and a keen understanding of the market. In this article, we’ll explore 10 effective forex strategies for scalping that can help traders maximize their profits while minimizing risk. 1. Moving Average…

[the-hydroxian-artblog]

Do Neuromorphs feel some kinda way about Stochastic Parrots? Is it like humans seeing monkeys? Humans seeing chatbots? Humans seeing other, disabled humans? Or is it not particularly notable, given their prevalence, just another kind of guy that exists in this world? As a human living in boring, robot-hijinksless world, I imagine it would be kind of upsetting to see something superficially resembling you, well-spoken and seemingly of your intelligence, but with nothing behind the eyes. You also mentioned that these categories of brain-type aren’t strictly indicative of consciousness, which makes it weirder. Does a Stochastic Parrot with some consciousness remain incapable of emotion? Does a Neuromorph that isn’t fully conscious feel emotions? This worldbuilding rules and I keep thinking about it at work.

Thank you! Yes yes! All of the above, really. Because they're just people. Culturally, human-like robots have a sort of... tug-and-pull relationship with less human-like robots. Plenty of solidarity, alienation, trying to appeal to humans by overacting their own humanity, trying to reject aspects of their own humanity to show solidarity with less-passably human robots. These are basically all the pressing questions of this setting. There's so many varying degrees of weird prejudice and assumptions made on all sides when it comes to human-like bots and non-human-like ones. How people judge you based on the behavior you exhibit, the in-groups that form or fail to form depending on how well you perform the idea of "personhood", etc etc.

Could some neuromorphs exhibit human-like behavior but with the potential emotional consciousness of like, a roach? If a S.Parrot actually comprehends and problem-solves better than a human and, without any training data work out deep philosophical concepts, but is emotionless, is there some strange kind of consciousness going on still? The wonderfully irritating thing is that these can't be answered unless You Are The Thing Itself. I don't know what it's like to be several GPUs stacked on top of each other, so I cannot answer that question without projecting my own experience as a Meat Computer.

The only thing I can actually answer is how People, by whatever definition counts, will reject, accept, understand, or fail to understand, The Other. Whether that's by a robot judging a neurodivergent human who cannot exhibit stereotypically human-like traits, two different types of humans of different cultures judging each other, two different robots judging each other, or even People who should be of the exact same in-group alienating each other due to ignorance, beliefs, lack of beliefs, or other fine differences. That's basically what this worldbuilding is all about. Asking what counts as a person isn't as fruitful as observing what motivates people to come up with their own answers, how willing they are to compromise those answers if their interests align or fail to align with The Other, and what cruelty or kindness they're willing to dish out at something that's considered acceptable to hate or understand.

[sunflowerdigs]

I've been keeping up with the Nex Benedict case and while I think there are sources that better describe the anti-trans rhetoric pushed by the school and Oklahoma legislature (like this one and this one, surprisingly, given its history), I think this article is the best one for actual facts about the case. Not calling an ambulance was actually in line with school policy, but the policy itself seems...questionable. Basically, the school was able to tell Nex's parents "yeah, we're not going to call an ambulance and send them to the hospital, but we strongly recommend that you do". Which...wtf? If your position is that you strongly recommend that a child with a head injury go to a hospital, just send them? Additionally, not automatically filing a police report is also in line with school protocol - current policy is for the school to give parents/students the option to file and to then schedule a time for them to do so if they wish. What's interesting is that Nex's parents spoke to a school resources police officer at the hospital they drove Nex to after the fight, which...makes me wonder whether the school actually offered them the option to file the report or whether the hospital did. Either way, I saw some comments online indicating that the school is a hotbed of bullying that the administration takes no responsibility for, which seems in line with its policies (and with putting self-admitted stochastic terrorist Chaya Raichik on its state library advisory board - what a nightmare). No one has been charged yet because a cause of death has yet to be determined (they're waiting for a tox screen) but hopefully, whatever they find in the autopsy will point clearly to the bullies and they'll be punished. More importantly, though, the school administration needs to be held accountable and made an example of, imo.

[covid-safer-hotties]

Epigenetic patterns, accelerated biological aging, and enhanced epigenetic drift detected 6 months following COVID-19 infection: insights from a genome-wide DNA methylation study - Published Aug 20, 2024

Abstract Background The epigenetic status of patients 6-month post-COVID-19 infection remains largely unexplored. The existence of long-COVID, or post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC), suggests potential long-term changes. Long-COVID includes symptoms like fatigue, neurological issues, and organ-related problems, regardless of initial infection severity. The mechanisms behind long-COVID are unclear, but virus-induced epigenetic changes could play a role.

Methods and results Our study explores the lasting epigenetic impacts of SARS-CoV-2 infection. We analyzed genome-wide DNA methylation patterns in an Italian cohort of 96 patients 6 months after COVID-19 exposure, comparing them to 191 healthy controls. We identified 42 CpG sites with significant methylation differences (FDR < 0.05), primarily within CpG islands and gene promoters. Dysregulated genes highlighted potential links to glutamate/glutamine metabolism, which may be relevant to PASC symptoms. Key genes with potential significance to COVID-19 infection and long-term effects include GLUD1, ATP1A3, and ARRB2. Furthermore, Horvath's epigenetic clock showed a slight but significant age acceleration in post-COVID-19 patients. We also observed a substantial increase in stochastic epigenetic mutations (SEMs) in the post-COVID-19 group, implying potential epigenetic drift. SEM analysis identified 790 affected genes, indicating dysregulation in pathways related to insulin resistance, VEGF signaling, apoptosis, hypoxia response, T-cell activation, and endothelin signaling.

Conclusions Our study provides valuable insights into the epigenetic consequences of COVID-19. Results suggest possible associations with accelerated aging, epigenetic drift, and the disruption of critical biological pathways linked to insulin resistance, immune response, and vascular health. Understanding these epigenetic changes could be crucial for elucidating the complex mechanisms behind long-COVID and developing targeted therapeutic interventions.

[genkishoujo]

I think there's a difference between stochastic terrorism and state discrimination, and I think that discussions about empire explicity turning upon even its servants within the fold for their undesirability being indicative of empire intending to mandate mistreatment of undesirables are important to have. I want the servants of empire to suffer, but that doesn't mean I can't hear the canary in the coal mine falling silent.

this is less 'canary in the coal mine' and more 'dog wagged by its own tail'. the imperial overlords pulling up the ladders on trans people in the military only indicates that the imperial core is on a decline (as predicted by its capitalist nature), and thus its most expendable demographics are tossed to the wayside. in modern, neoliberal socialist democracies you see any manner of integration, but it ultimately services bourgeois world domination. the imperial core abandoning trans people is part of the design. exclusion of trans people in an arm of state violence intended for the oppression of anything outside of european heteropatriarchy means only that the kid gloves are coming off, not that trans people had any control over it to begin with.

[scarcelyimpossiblespire]

A long-dormant Polygon whale just made waves by snapping up a rising new token, XYZVerse, fueling speculation that this sports-fueled crypto could be the next breakout to watch.

Table of Contents

XYZ aims for G.O.A.T. status: Early buyers eye 1,000x gains

Polygon fluctuates

Conclusion

After five years of silence, a major holder of Polygon tokens has resurfaced. This investor is now acquiring a new cryptocurrency linked to POL. The unexpected move has caught the attention of market watchers. The new token is showing signs of significant growth potential. Could this be a signal of shifting trends in the market?

XYZ aims for G.O.A.T. status: Early buyers eye 1,000x gains

XYZVerse (XYZ) isn’t your average memecoin, it’s fusing the high-octane world of sports with crypto’s fast-moving edge. Built for die-hard fans of football, basketball, MMA, and esports, XYZVerse is more than just a token, it’s a competitive movement powered by adrenaline and community.

With its bold “Greatest of All Time” (G.O.A.T.) vision, XYZVerse is setting its sights far beyond typical memecoin hype. It’s already turning heads, recently crowned as the Best New Meme Project on the scene.

What gives XYZ the edge? Backed by a detailed roadmap and a fired-up community, the project is geared toward lasting impact and serious growth.

The XYZ presale is heating up fast, offering early investors tokens at a steep discount:

Launch price: $0.0001

Current price: $0.003333

Next presale stage: $0.005

Final presale price: $0.02

Target listing price: $0.10

With over $13 million already raised, momentum is building rapidly. The project’s ambitious target is a 1,000x return for those who locked in early. As demand soars, each presale stage brings higher prices, so those who act soon stand to gain the most.

XYZ is already making waves before hitting major exchanges. With listings on top CEXs and DEXs on the horizon, the opportunity window is closing fast.

You might also like:How a $500 stake in XYZVerse might transform over time

Polygon fluctuates

POL (ex-MATIC POL) has experienced notable price fluctuations recently. Over the past week, the coin saw a slight decline of 3.21%, settling within the current price range of $0.22 to $0.24. However, zooming out to the monthly view, POL has demonstrated a significant rebound with a 21.93% increase. Despite this short-term growth, the coin remains down by 23.38% over the past six months, reflecting broader market volatility.

Technical indicators point to key levels that could influence POL’s trajectory. The nearest resistance level is at $0.26, with a secondary resistance at $0.28. If the price pushes beyond these thresholds, it might signal a bullish trend. On the support side, levels at $0.21 and $0.19 could provide a safety net against further declines.

The 10-day simple moving average is $0.23, slightly below the 100-day average of $0.24, suggesting a cautious short-term outlook. The Relative Strength Index (RSI) stands at 53.70, indicating that the coin is neither overbought nor oversold. Meanwhile, a high Stochastic value of 91.17 might hint at potential overbought conditions.

Market observers note that while the recent monthly gain is promising, the mixed signals from technical indicators warrant careful attention. POL’s ability to break through resistance levels or hold above support zones could set the tone for its near-term performance. As the crypto market continues to evolve, staying informed on these key metrics remains crucial for those watching POL’s journey.

Conclusion

While established coins like POL show promise, XYZVerse stands out, uniting sports fans in a community-driven ecosystem aiming for substantial growth and cultural impact.

To find more information about XYZVerse, visit the official website.