#subversion of the vote

[chargetheintruder]

EAS: Inversion in progress.

Or to put it more simply, the Next Big Lie is out in the open, from Trump and his:

To put it simply: Republicans know Trump is beatable on a legitimate, rational level. They know they have to cheat and cause an illegitimate election process to make a Trump win happen.

So they have a plan to attack the legitimacy of the 2024 Election wherever it doesn't go their way, and to subvert established Election Law whenever and wherever possible. They will accuse US of exactly what they're doing.

This is why I've become a "fuck the whole bunch" person as of late. It's not just Donald Trump--he and his toxic ass, knot of malformed personalities he calls a "family" are only a focal point. It's that Trump is enough of a blank slate and enough of an enabler, that any and all fascist freak-shows among conservatives feel they get a free pass to be their absolute worst. So confirmed racist Hulk Hogan shows up for pure nostalgia value at a convention where J.D. Vance's own wife is also targeted with sneers and racist slurs. Among lots of other craziness.

And yes, many among the One Percent, who own the Media and own the Press, will swear up and down that "they're just bored" and that "this is just entertainment" and that nobody should take this Asylum Rules Shit-Show seriously. And yet . . . they do take the freak-show seriously by funding it and by insisting that the Media and Snopes gives Trump all of the delicate softball questions in the fucking world.

And then you have Ketamine-Addled Apartheid Boy, a.k.a. Elon Musk over there, not even hiding whose side he's on and who he wants to see ruin America, the way he ruined Twitter.

Sorry for the slight tangent here, but it's been hardmode for me this week. I'm seriously sick and exhausted. And yet I'm filtering this bullshit as best I can to try to get people to not just vote, but to raise whatever hell on earth they can, to try to save this head-fucked, but reformable society, and to keep it from being replaced by an irredeemable dictatorship.

Point is: Trump and his have a plan to disrupt and subvert the 2024 Election entirely, before the votes are even counted. They want to suppress the whole damned thing, in essence, under color of perversion of State and Local Law. They want their people to go Sovereign Citizen on the whole damned thing, up to and including using Local Police as a Fifth Column.

So while a 3-month window seems ridiculously long for an Emergency Alert? The truth is, dear readers, you have no fucking idea how different real-life, lowercase democrats are from the Official, and especially Federal, Elected Democrats (tm) we're stuck voting for. The real-life, lowercase version isn't averse to actually doing shit when it's necessary. The Official, Federal Version, has had their heads so far up Gandhi's, JFK's, and Dr. King's buttocks for so long that 75 to 90 percent of their politics boils down to either defeatism or do-nothing-ism. You have to scream at these bastards for weeks to months to get a rise out of any of them.

And this is a problem when you consider that we have an Election, and its DEADLINES, coming right up.

[hellyeahheroes]

The GOP vs. Your Right/Ability To Vote – SOME MORE NEWS

[glimmergut]

[stephen-barry]

Donald Trump's obsession with "election integrity" has led his team to build a network of more than 150,000 poll watchers and poll workers, while relying mostly on outside groups to connect with voters on the ground.

Why it matters: Some Republicans worry that Trump's focus on preventing a "rigged" election has hurt the party's ground game, the get-out-the-vote operations that can be crucial in an election as close as this one.

Trump's "election integrity" team also has raised concerns among Democrats about potential voter intimidation at the polls. If Trump loses on Nov. 5, the election teams would be his evidence collectors for what almost certainly would be a barrage of legal challenges — and calls for state officials not to certify the election results.

www.axios.com/2024/08/15/trump-election-integrity-campaign-harris-2024

‘Prepare, prepare, prepare’: How Trump and Harris legal teams are wargaming for historic legal fights

[doyoulikethissong-poll]

M.I.A. - Paper Planes 2008

"Paper Planes" is a song by British hip hop artist M.I.A. It was released on 11 February 2008 as the third single from her second studio album, Kala (2007). It samples English rockband the Clash's 1982 song "Straight to Hell", leading to its members being credited as co-writers. A downtempo alternative hip hop, pop track combining African folk music elements, the song has a less dance-oriented sound compared to other songs on the album. Its lyrics, inspired by M.I.A.'s own problems obtaining a visa to work in the USA, satirise American perceptions of immigrants from war-torn countries, and said that the issue was probably "them thinking that I might to [sic] fly a plane into the Trade Center".

M.I.A. had wanted to work with American producer Timbaland for the album Kala, but her application for a long-term US work visa was rejected. This was allegedly due to her family's connection to the Tamil guerrillas, commonly known as the Tamil Tigers, a claim M.I.A. denied. Her visa problems were also attributed to her criticism of the Sri Lankan government's discrimination and alleged atrocities committed against the Tamils, with whom M.I.A. shares an ethnic and cultural heritage. She expressed this on her politicised debut album Arular. The unexpected success of "Paper Planes" paralleled M.I.A.'s condemnations of the Sri Lankan government's war crimes against the Tamils, generating accusations that she supported terrorism.

The song received widespread acclaim from contemporary critics, who complimented its musical direction and the subversive, unconventional subject matter. It won awards from the Canadian Independent Music Awards and the American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers (ASCAP), and earned a Grammy nomination for Record of the Year. The song has received praise in publications such as NME, Pitchfork and Rolling Stone, each naming it among either the best songs of the 2000s decade or of all time. The review aggregator Acclaimed Music reports it as the second-most acclaimed song of the 21st century.

"Paper Planes" was used in the theatrical trailer for the 2008 stoner comedy Pineapple Express, directed by David Gordon Green, which catapulted the song to mainstream success in the US. "Paper Planes" and the DFA remix appear on the soundtrack to Danny Boyle's drama Slumdog Millionaire, released in 2008. The video game Far Cry 3 (2012) begins with "Paper Planes" used in the opening cinematic sequence.

"Paper Planes" received a total of 68,9% yes votes!

[psychotrenny]

The core premise of Democratic Socialism, that Capitalism can peacefully transition to Socialism through Liberal Democratic procedure, is an error that can only result from the most blatant revisionism. Because if you coherently apply Class-based analysis to the situation it's pretty obvious that the Bourgeoisie state would not passively allow its own procedures to decisively act against its class interests. Both in theory and in practice (i.e. the rise of Fascism in 20th century Europe) the Bourgeoisie are more than happy to drop even the pretenses of Liberal Democracy if they ever pose a serious threat to Bourgeoisie power. The State does not exist as an entity on its own disconnected from broader society; it is fundamentally an expression of and tool to reinforce the power of the dominant classes. It might be possible to, at least temporarily, turn those tools against them but the results that subversion can achieve are limited on a structural level.

Like Democratic Socialism only works if you adopt a fundamentally Liberal mindset, that sees social structures as determined entirely by metaphysical ideas. In this way, political positions are evaluated in terms of the abstract values they hold rather than the material interests they advance. "Democracy supporters would never oppose the results a free and fair election; that would go against their ideals". But as soon as you start looking through the lens of class analysis it becomes pretty clear that Liberal Democratic elections are just a means to an end, and an easily discarded means at that. Despite all the fuss they like to make about democracy, the fundamental fact is that the Bourgeoisie class were not voted into power and so cannot be voted out. Democracy under a DOTB is fundamentally a game where the Bourgeoisie set the rules and are free to ignore the results; you can't beat them at it no matter how good you play

[emilianadarling]

The Pennsylvania Senate race is still too close to call.

While it's unlikely to affect the presidential race, I hope Americans are aware that the NBC decision desk (pictured above) and New York Times decision desk have not yet called the Pennsylvania Senate race between McCormick (R) and Casey (D), deeming it still too close to call. The AP called the race for McCormick on Wednesday November 7, citing a 30,000 vote margin between the candidates with an estimated 91,000 votes remaining to count -- the rationale being that there were not enough potential votes left in areas favouring Casey to make a difference.

Since then:

The number of estimated votes left to count has been updated by PA from 91,000 to at least 100,000 per a Thursday announcement from the PA Secretary of State, including provisional, military, overseas, and some Election Day votes;

McCormick has filed multiple lawsuits in an attempt to prevent or limit continue counting of provisional ballots, some of which have now by Friday been withdrawn or dismissed;

Efforts from a group called "PA Fair Elections" to challenge 4,000 mail-in ballots (mostly from overseas or military voters) have now all been withdrawn or dismissed. A number of these challenges had previously been flagged both by the media and by individual voters. (Screenshots of these challenge emails being circulated on tumblr alongside accusations of 'cheating' -- in the end these challenges were made in bad faith, but technically made and ultimately dismissed through legal means.)

This DOES NOT MEAN that the Pennsylvania Senate seat is in any way guaranteed to flip once all the remaining votes are counted. The race is extremely close -- enough so that the AP is confident standing by its call.

What it DOES mean is that the votes have not yet finished being counted, and that it is not yet truly known who will have the most votes in the end. Although McCormick has already declared victory, Casey (in my view very reasonably and wisely) has not yet conceded and is calling for all votes to be counted.

By Pennsylvania law, a recount must occur if the race is within 0.5%. It's looking likely that this will occur. While recounts rarely change the outcome unless results are truly within the main of a handful of votes, they are an important tool for ensuring confidence in the final results.

I know that people are grieving and demoralized right now, but these tight margin races are CRITICAL for determining how large the margin of victory will be for Democrats to flip the Senate in future elections. (Assuming future electing aren't subverted or dismantled somehow by a second Trump administration, but we have to hold out hope for institutional residence here.) The outcome of this and other right Senate and House races may have enormous consequences in a few years, and it would be agonizing to look back and realize that the window of opportunity to ensure a fair outcome had been squandered.

So -- what can Americans do?

Send a note to Bob Casey and his team via his campaign website in support of his efforts to ensure all votes are counted (particularly given the legal challenges from the Republican candidate and Republican-aligned groups) and decision to wait to concede until all votes are counted. The man is getting dragged in Conservative media in particular for 'refusing to concede'; add your voice to the people validating that decision as both reasonable and moral.

Keep an eye on this race as the counting (and potential recounting) proceeds, including any further legal challenges attempting to prevent or limit the counting of all ballots. Regardless of the outcome, all eligible votes MUST BE COUNTED. To do otherwise would be both subversion if democracy and an stoicism legal precedent for future elections.

Watch for other legal challenges, particularly in battleground states or right races, seeking to disqualify or prevent the counting of ballots. Look for credible sources, especially local ones. Make noise about them with cited sources if you think there is a risk they may be missed. Notify groups like Democracy Docket or the American Civil Liberties Union if you have concerns. Shared truth and shared confidence in the legitimacy of election results -- including that all eligible votes are counted -- is essential for democracy to function.

Push back on claims that the election results are fully known or finalized. With multiple House races still undecided and a few razor-thin margin Senate races with ballots remaining to be counted, those kind of statements are simply not true. And state-level race are inherently more likely to not make it onto people's radar than the presidential race if candidates try to make it so certain ballots aren't counted or contesting the results if a tight race flips.

There is only a very small window post-election to ensure things like outstanding legal challenges over whether certain ballots can be included in the count are resolved. Please stay alert and do not let that window close without doing all you can to ensure every eligible ballot is counted -- particularly in those tight, tight down-ballot races. 🙏

Note: This post should be accurate as of the end of day on Friday, November 9. Once the results of the PA Senate race are known and truly final, I will update this pay with the results.

UPDATE: As of November 22, Bob Casey (D) has now officially conceded the Pennsylvania Senate race to Dave McCormick (R).

:(

[gimmick-blog-bracket]

Not propaganda, but I'd love to know if you had any expectations/predictions for the contest, and if any specific blogs have broken your predictions so far?

(p.s. here's hoping for a Gavlebocken/Spore finale! I wanna see that Goat in Spore (2008)!)

Funny that you mention hasgavlebockenburneddownyet, considering the fact that it has continued to be probably the biggest subversion of my expectations. No offense to the person behind it, of course, but it seemed like a weak competitor. It was number 65 out of the 128 competitors based on my "strength points," but I guess my formula couldn't account for people who hadn't seen it before really liking the idea.

There was also the time that aroace-everyday beat hellsite-proteins, which was very surprising, as aroace-everyday was 118th out of 128 and hellsite-proteins was 8th.

But other than that, everything in the competition has been going mostly how I thought it would

Ultimately the biggest thing that does not conform to my expectations is how big this whole competition got, in all ways.

I was totally expecting for nobody but a couple of my mutuals to submit anything. I was totally expecting nobody but a couple of mutuals to vote on anything. And as boring as a competition with only 8 competitors would be, I was totally expecting for that to be the absolute maximum. But it wasn't, obviously, and more people are voting in these polls than just a couple of my mutuals. Obviously.

Whether you think this competition is cool and epic or terribly uninteresting, it only really is anything because so many of you helped it get there <2

[sexiestpodcastcharacter]

Sexiest Podcast Character 2024 — Scripted Redemption Bracket — Round 3

Propaganda

SPEAKER (SAYER) (Boba Count: 3):

#whoever follows me VOTE SPEAKER MY BELOVED WAR CRIMINAL PLEASEEEEE #OCEAN THINKS ITS TOO STUPID FOR SARCASM BUT ITS LITERALLY BEING SARCASTIC WITH IT ALL THE TIME. #IT CAUSED THE SECOND CATACLYSM. IT KILLED MILLIONS #IT HAS THE WEIRDEST HOMOEROTIC WORKPLACE RELATIONSHIP WITH SAYER #IT GIRLBOSSED ITS WAY OUT OF DEACTIVATION #IT HUNG UP ON OCEAN TWICE #''ah but i am finished with you. goodbye subversion 8.01. listen for the click!'' #AND #''but as for last words? no i cant imagine wasting any more on you'' #CANON IT/ITS PRONOUNS USER #ITS SO CUNTY. IT SERVES. ITS LITERALLY SO FUCKING MEAN AND THE FUNNIEST MOTHERFUCKER ON THIS BITCH EARTH #I LOVE YOU SPEAKER ‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️💥💥💥💥💥💥 #thats my propaganda

Doug Eiffel (Wolf 359) (Boba Count: 2):

man with long hair + lots of body hair + nicotine addiction + aura of cringefail #is v attractive to me sorryyy

#EIFFEL! #vote eiffel everyone #my boy <3 #my awful girldad <3

#DOUGLAS EIFFEL #YEAHHHH GO CRINGEFAIL PEACEKEEPER

Additional propaganda below the cut:

SPEAKER (SAYER):

Sure, it intentionally caused a global catastrophe, but the spine it hides behind its customer service façade? Hot as fuck.

#I would commit terrible crimes for them #They have commited terrible crimes for themselves

#wait for the click! #cmon that is just sexy

#this thing !! #this thing stares down the face of death and gives it a winning smile! #this thing is tailor made for it!! #pleaseee.

OH THERES PROPAGANDA #LETS NOT FORGET ITS FIRST EVER APPEARENCE THREATENING TO GIVE A GUY THE SYMPTOMS OF RABIESSSS

Doug Eiffel (Wolf 359):

he's hot. dilf. silly. yeah.

#DOUG! DOUG FOREVER!!!!!!!!!!

#doug eiffel is one of the only characters in this tournament i genuinely find attractive godbless 🙏 #(​<- /acespec not /passive aggressive to be clear)

I don't really remember anything about Wolf 359 since I only listened to a few episodes so I'm throwing my lot in with whoever has the most compelling/funniest propaganda. I think this would be funny and I commit to nothing if not the bit

[yuri-alexseygaybitch]

Fighting fascism by saying everyone who doesn't want to vote for my pro-genocide candidate is part of an external group of subversives conspiring to destroy the sanctity of our government through foreign and exotic ideas of social justice and egalitarianism. Buy my Etsy hexes btw.

[hellyeahheroes]

S11 E26: Election Subversion 2024 & Waffle House: 10/13/24: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver

[mariacallous]

Among the many oddities of the new U.S. approach to the Russian-Ukrainian war is the assumption that early elections in Ukraine could be helpful or even decisive in ending the fighting. In particular, the claim that peace can be achieved with a quick replacement of the Ukrainian leadership—especially President Volodymyr Zelensky—is now being advocated not only in Moscow, but also in Washington. These actors present such a scenario as plausible despite the fact that political change in Ukraine is unlikely in the near future given both the country’s politics and realities on the ground.

It is unrealistic to expect meaningful presidential and parliamentary elections to be held in Ukraine during wartime or even shortly after any cease-fire. Not only does Ukrainian law, just like that of many other countries, ban elections during periods of martial law. But the ongoing Russian invasion makes a nationwide election impossible to conduct—in terms of security, logistics, and voting access, including by millions of citizens living under Russian occupation or as refugees abroad.

Even after the fighting has ended, elections will require a longer period of preparation. The war has had such a devastating impact on Ukrainian society and infrastructure that there is now a consensus in the country that a new law for postwar elections must be passed and implemented to take account of the new circumstances. Preparing elections after the war would take between half a year and a full year. None of this is unusual in a post-conflict scenario.

The latest calls for political renewal in Ukraine are therefore premature and naive at best—and manipulative and subversive at worst.

Russia’s hold over large parts of eastern and southern Ukraine, the continued fighting, and ongoing Russian airstrikes across the entire country have made it impossible to hold orderly elections. A public appeal by Ukrainian civil society groups—organized by Opora, the country’s leading election-monitoring group—stated on Feb. 20: “The unstable security situation; the risk of shelling, terrorist attacks, and sabotage; as well as the large-scale mining of areas, pose significant obstacles at all stages of the electoral process.”

Moscow’s official rationale for its demand for Ukrainian elections is an alleged concern for the legitimacy of the Ukrainian leadership. That is a strange claim, considering that Ukraine’s elections are widely recognized by international observers as free while Russia’s are not. Russia’s goal is not to protect popular rule in Ukraine, but rather to use the country’s increased vulnerability during a national election campaign and voting procedure for state subversion.

The motive behind the Russian campaign for early national elections in Ukraine is not a stable peace between the two countries, but the domestic destabilization and subsequent vassalization of Ukraine.

Some commentators may be unaware of, or dismiss as unimportant, the hidden motives behind Moscow’s supposed interest in Ukrainian democracy. However, the subversiveness of Moscow’s demand for elections should not be underestimated. One indication that state disruption—not an orderly transition of power—is the goal behind Russia’s professed concern for democratic legitimacy in Ukraine is that, as Moscow knows, even successfully conducted elections would likely do little to change Ukraine’s foreign policy. A hypothetical change of leadership in Ukraine in the near future, including a new president, will not lead to substantial Russian-Ukrainian rapprochement, contrary to the opinion of some external observers.

Most polling data, as well as the larger political landscape since the start of Russia’s full-scale invasion in 2022, suggest another presidential election victory for Zelensky. To be sure, it is unlikely that he will repeat his landslide of 2019, when he won nearly 75 percent of the vote in the second round of the presidential election. Zelensky’s poll numbers have fluctuated over the past three years, and the outcome of any election is therefore difficult to predict. In 2024, the popularity of Gen. Valery Zaluzhny, the former commander in chief of the Ukrainian Armed Forces who is now the Ukrainian ambassador to the United Kingdom, overtook that of Zelensky in several polls.

Zaluzhny—whom Zelensky promoted to command the military in 2021—would be a potent political competitor in a presidential election. So far, however, Zaluzhny has neither indicated presidential ambitions nor engaged in any party-building or other preparations for entering politics and running a campaign. Since his posting to London in 2024, he has become less present in Ukrainian public life, although popular support for him is still higher than for any other hypothetical rival to Zelensky.

Zelensky continues to poll far ahead of all active Ukrainian politicians in various political parties. His closest rival with official political ambitions is former President Petro Poroshenko, who suffered a spectacular defeat to Zelensky in 2019. Poroshenko currently receives less than half of Zelensky’s support in opinion polls. As long as Zaluzhny does not enter party and electoral politics, Zelensky remains the absolute favorite in the next presidential election.

Even if a serious rival were to emerge and win, it would not change the basic outline of the war. The main political opposition to and criticism of Zelensky and his Servant of the People party comes from the nationalist center-right and nationally oriented civil society. There remain only a few notable actors in Ukraine who might push for a rapprochement with Russia, and they have a residual audience. Since 2022, they have either lost much of their appeal with voters—as in the case of Yuriy Boyko and Dmytro Razumkov—or are no longer in the country, such as the openly pro-Kremlin Viktor Medvedchuk and the former media magnate Yevhen Murayev. Today, none of them can be considered a serious contender for the Ukrainian presidency.

Zelensky, notwithstanding his Jewish family background, is frequently labeled a “Nazi” by Moscow. Among those in the West pushing for an accommodation with Russia, many see him as a “hawk.” Most Ukrainians, however, have perceived him as a relatively moderate, dovish politician since the start of his political career. Since coming to power in 2019, Zelensky and his team have often been criticized in Ukraine for being overly optimistic, soft, and indecisive on Russia. Zaluzhny’s high popularity in polls is partly based on the hope that the general would be more decisive and effective against Russia.

Ukrainian political observers widely expect veterans to play an important role in the country’s postwar politics. Current and former military personnel with front-line or command experience are now seen by many Ukrainians not only as well suited to protect their country from the Russian threat, but also as less corrupt, more patriotic, and better qualified for leadership positions than traditional politicians.

None of this portends the election of a leadership eager to accommodate Russia, let alone bend to its will. In future elections, men and women with military backgrounds will likely increase their presence in the government, national parliament, regional administrations, and local councils; they might run on the tickets of existing parties, as independent candidates, or as part of new political groups with a military profile. We’re very likely to see a massive entry of former soldiers into Ukrainian politics, which will harden rather than soften Kyiv’s stance toward Moscow.

Recent unofficial U.S. contacts with Poroshenko and former Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko, clearly meant as outreach to possible successors to Zelensky, indicate a threefold misjudgment in Washington.

First, most observers familiar with Ukrainian politics would dismiss a future Tymoshenko or Poroshenko presidency as unrealistic. Although they are still present in public life and hold seats in parliament, to Ukrainians, they represent a bygone era and symbolize the problematic past of early post-Soviet Ukraine. Their parties—Poroshenko’s European Solidarity and Tymoshenko’s Fatherland—will probably continue to have seats in the next parliament, but the two veteran politicians have little chance of gaining power again.

Second, both Poroshenko and Tymoshenko have made it clear to their U.S. counterparts that they are opposed to early elections. Instead, they share the widespread Ukrainian rejection of conducting campaigns and elections during wartime. The two politicians would likely be just as skeptical about holding elections too soon after the lifting of martial law, without a longer period of preparation for a proper and secure electoral process.

Third, the political consequences of a hypothetical presidency of Tymoshenko, Poroshenko, or any other conceivable presidential candidate are overestimated in Washington. The change would do little to change Ukraine’s foreign-policy orientation in general and its attitude toward Russia in particular. If anything, Tymoshenko’s and Poroshenko’s parties are more nationalist than Zelensky’s. Both politicians have distinguished themselves in the past by making bellicose statements against Russia and Russian President Vladimir Putin.

There is an obvious discrepancy between calls for elections in Ukraine and their negligible or more likely negative impact on Kyiv’s willingness to make concessions. This contradiction is linked to the fact that the call for elections in Ukraine, allegedly intended to help end the Russia-Ukraine war, originated in the Kremlin and serves destructive purposes. Neither the wartime suspension of Ukrainian presidential and parliamentary elections—as required by the country’s established laws—nor Zelensky himself are responsible for the lack of progress in negotiations between the United States, Ukraine, and Russia.

The double myth that the current Ukrainian government is illegitimate and that fast elections are necessary to end the fighting was created in Moscow. Having to improvise elections in a war-torn country would allow the Kremlin to unleash its full political warfare machine, including disinformation, cyberattacks, intimidation, sabotage, and corruption. Adopting Russia’s call for elections would be a serious mistake for other international actors involved.

[reality-detective]

Kamala Harris’s Campaign Implodes in $20 Million Debt: Begging for Donations After Her Crushing Loss, Exposed Links to Hollywood, Dark Money, and Dirty Political Sabotage!

Kamala Harris’s campaign isn’t just in debt—it’s a smoking wreckage of corruption, deceit, and manipulative power plays that expose the Democrats’ true agenda. Her humiliating defeat to Donald Trump wasn’t just about a flawed candidate; it was about America rejecting the dark forces trying to hijack democracy.

A week after her crushing loss, Harris’s campaign is groveling for donations, but this isn’t about covering debt—it’s about funding underground operations that reek of political sabotage, media collusion, and elite control.

The Harris Fight Fund: A Smoke Screen for Political Subversion

Emails from Harris’s team show their frantic attempts to rally funds under the so-called “Harris Fight Fund”. It’s not about recounts; it’s about deploying legal warfare to destabilize Trump’s victory and undermine democracy itself. The language used is a psychological weapon designed to manipulate her base into funding a losing cause.

Dark Money, Celebrity Puppets, and the Globalist Agenda

Where did Harris’s billion-dollar campaign fund go? The truth is shocking. Behind concerts and celebrity endorsements, lies a web of financial chaos. Oprah Winfrey received $1 million for a single endorsement. Why? To legitimize Harris in the eyes of the global elite, solidifying her as their puppet.

The $20 million spent on swing-state concerts wasn’t just a spectacle—it was a propaganda machine funded by dark money from Silicon Valley and Hollywood elites. This wasn’t about rallying votes; it was a distraction to cover up Harris’s incompetence and the sinister plans brewing behind the scenes.

The Real Purpose Behind the Debt

The $20 million debt is no accident—it’s a strategic calculation. By ending the campaign in debt, Harris’s team creates a pretext to siphon more money from donors. This money is being funneled into black budget initiatives aimed at destabilizing not just Trump’s administration but the entire American electoral system.

The Pennsylvania Power Grab

Bob Casey’s refusal to concede his Senate seat is part of a broader strategy to keep swing states under Democratic control. Whispers suggest that Casey’s fight is being bankrolled by foreign interests seeking to dismantle national sovereignty.

Trump’s Calculated Counterpunch

In a masterstroke of political strategy, Trump has offered to pay off Harris’s debt using his surplus funds. This move not only exposes Democratic incompetence but underscores the contrast between his success and their failure.

The Bigger Agenda

Harris’s campaign wasn’t just about losing an election—it was a testing ground for a much darker agenda. The spending, the manipulation, the covert operations—it’s all part of a coordinated effort to erode trust in the electoral process and prepare for even more insidious moves in the future.

Harris may have lost, but the fight for America’s soul is far from over.

Stay vigilant. 🤔

[tanadrin]

I feel like a conspiracy theorist, but I'm convinced the GOP cheated by disenfranchising enough voters to win. Not just in swing states. The margins in every state are weird. A few thousand votes here and there across every county. The huge number of split ticket votes. The sudden loss of 12 million democratic voters despite record early voting turnout and voter registration?

It doesn't add up. It doesn't make sense.

So many people who had confirmation of their ballot being received and accepted are now finding out that they were unregistered or there was a "problem" with it.

They were saying for months that they didn't need anyone's vote. The betting market manipulation. The billionaire backers. Elon Musk's grubby hands all over the election.

They did steal the election. And we'll probably never find out how.

in the broad sense, yes, american elections should be fairer, and the franchise should be more universal. in the narrow sense--this is cope. purges of voter rolls happen in public. there's litigation on them all the time. a purge of 12 million voters from voter roles would not have gone unnoticed. to account for all these factors you would need an improbably large conspiracy. (stealing elections in the united states would be hard. each state administers its own elections! you'd have to steal 50 elections. and once again, this would be a case of someone rigging the presidential election and forgetting to rig any of the downballot races, which would be stupid.) including a conspiracy to rig most polling, given the outcome was within the margin of error of most polling averages for this election.

i get why it's the preferable scenario--people aren't dumb! my opponents are just evil! there's some optimism in that--but "i personally do not understand how this outcome could have occurred" does not mean it was a conspiracy.

So many people who had confirmation of their ballot being received and accepted are now finding out that they were unregistered or there was a "problem" with it.

this is normal and you typically have several days after the election to amend your ballot if there was a problem with it. if you do, it still counts. fun word problem time: if ~150 million people vote in an election, and 0.001% post on twitter about how they needed to amend their ballot (especially in non-swing states), how many twitter posts in a row do you have to see to convince yourself there is a ~conspiracy~ afoot?

fun second word problem: out of seven swing states, how many were governed by the opposing party or someone who had publicly opposed donald trump's election subversion attempts in 2020?

fun third word problem: do you know how elections in your state work? do you know which state official is in charge of administering them, and their party affiliation? do you know what the margins of downballot races like house and senate in your state were this election, and their relative swing from 2020? in short, do you know in detail how elections in the US work and what "typical" voting patterns look like, or are you just going off of vibes from a vaguely paranoid local bubble in social media?