a-go-ni-a - Tumblr blog

[a-go-ni-a]

Actual real things about the plot of 90's Brazilian children's show Castelo Rá-Tim-Bum

The main character was a 400-year-old boy wizard who lived with his aunt and uncle in a giant-ass castle in the middle of a big city that no one in the city knew about

He lived with his aunt and uncle because his parents and sister were on a trip to Mars and he didn't want to go

The castle was secret but there was a pizza guy who'd pop in once in a while (maybe he worked for a company that delivered pizza to the supernatural?).

There was a kid who lived inside a tv and that was treated as completely normal.

In the first episode he lured the three other protagonists to the castle by making their ball float to the castle entrance (he was bored and wanted friends).

The castle's librarian was a talking orange cat.

There was an alien named Etevaldo who would sometimes pop in for a visit.

There was a random tree in the middle of the castle's foyer where some birds and a talking pink anaconda lived

The anaconda was called Celeste

There was a little purple monster who lived in the castle sewers called Mau (literally, "Bad") who wanted to be bad and a villain but he was really bad at it

There was no explanation as to what Mau was -- he was just this furry purple thing and everyone just went with it

Mau had a rat henchman named Godofredo (Godfrey) who had anxiety problems

The castle had a mouse who drove a mouse-shaped car and everyone was like "Yeah, that's normal, be careful so you don't step on it"

The villain was Doutor Abobrinha (literally, "Doctor Pumpkin"; abobrinha is also slang for "lies", implying he was a liar), who was a realtor who wanted to tear the castle down to gentrify the neighbourhood

The realtor looked like this:

[a-go-ni-a]

someone needs to take me out before i say something i’ll regret

[a-go-ni-a]

Endlessly diabolical how you can't say words like rape and suicide uncensored without either being criticised by idiots or punished by conglomerates.

[a-go-ni-a]

It’s alright, Just Breathe

[a-go-ni-a]

Trans allyship leaving y’all’s body the moment a trans man has a unique relationship with masculinity/manhood and doesn’t want to look like a cis man

[a-go-ni-a]

muito cuidado ao fazerem projeção astral na biblioteca da UFPB, tem um cachorro projetando lá atacando todo mundo, fiquei muito mordida espiritualmente.

[a-go-ni-a]

Twitter LGBTs are so sanitized it’s embarrassing

[a-go-ni-a]

New more mature way of dealing with being bad at things I thought i would be good at

[a-go-ni-a]

THE NEW YORK TIMES instructed journalists covering Israel’s war on the Gaza Strip to restrict the use of the terms “genocide” and “ethnic cleansing” and to “avoid” using the phrase “occupied territory” when describing Palestinian land, according to a copy of an internal memo obtained by The Intercept. The memo also instructs reporters not to use the word Palestine “except in very rare cases” and to steer clear of the term “refugee camps” to describe areas of Gaza historically settled by displaced Palestinians expelled from other parts of Palestine during previous Israeli–Arab wars. The areas are recognized by the United Nations as refugee camps and house hundreds of thousands of registered refugees.

The Times memo outlines guidance on a range of phrases and terms. “The nature of the conflict has led to inflammatory language and incendiary accusations on all sides. We should be very cautious about using such language, even in quotations. Our goal is to provide clear, accurate information, and heated language can often obscure rather than clarify the fact,” the memo says. “Words like ‘slaughter,’ ‘massacre’ and ‘carnage’ often convey more emotion than information. Think hard before using them in our own voice,” according to the memo. “Can we articulate why we are applying those words to one particular situation and not another? As always, we should focus on clarity and precision — describe what happened rather than using a label.” Despite the memo’s framing as an effort to not employ incendiary language to describe killings “on all sides,” in the Times reporting on the Gaza war, such language has been used repeatedly to describe attacks against Israelis by Palestinians and almost never in the case of Israel’s large-scale killing of Palestinians.

End your New York Times subscription

[a-go-ni-a]

[a-go-ni-a]

prompt #94

“I’m not really into cliché’s,” the villain, once who the hero thought they could call a friend, hummed under their breath, lip teasing up into a smirk. “So let’s skip the whole ‘join me’ speech, shall we?”

The hero felt the tip of the sword dig into their throat, and they could barely even meet the villain’s eyes. All along, they had never been on their side.

“Are you going to kill me?”

The villain’s brow quirks. “Oh, baby. Maybe I should’ve given you the speech - I’m not going to kill you. I’m just going to skip straight to the part where I drag you from here, kicking and screaming, and make you join my side whether you like it or not. I have always been more acquainted with actions rather than words, after all.”

[a-go-ni-a]

booktok videos should be categorized as some sort of threat to public health

[a-go-ni-a]

im aroace but if a tall muscular woman looked me up and down and raised an eyebrow i would not hesitate to get under her no questions asked

[a-go-ni-a]

[a-go-ni-a]

[a-go-ni-a]

crown jelly

twitter/ insta/ store