age-of-discourse

[age-of-discourse]

shipping incest or pedophilia is not an “unpopular opinion” it is fucking disgusting and fundamentally wrong and anyone who disagrees with this post can just unfollow me right now

[age-of-discourse]

Love (/sarcasm) how the first posts on that blog are complaining about terfs following them.

@/inclus-cringe-comp was suggested to us so uh

That kinda tells me either we follow someone who’s an exclus, or an exclus follows us.

If you’re against pan, bi, ace, mspec lesbian/gay, use of the word “queer,” etc get the fuck out.

Hosts are transmasc and bi/pan and nonbinary, we are also physically disabled and have ADHD and DID, and we’re also autistic. If you’re an exclus, you’re not with us. Period.

[age-of-discourse]

as a lighter note, changed my pinned post from “woman-loving-woman” to “lesbian”

[age-of-discourse]

“[lolis] are not really about age, it’s about the appearance and the childlike qualities of the character!” are you hearing yourself right now. why are you a lolicon

[age-of-discourse]

hey, the person blatantly misgendering antishippers (not even! they respond to people just being like “hey, i don’t want proshippers to interact”) has a url attached to them!

anyway, block @/fictionalcharactersarentreal for misgendering and not respecting dnis

[age-of-discourse]

i wish i were making this up but this is really an ao3 bootlicker’s response to someone suggesting incest had a warning tag:

[ID: Some of the reasons there is no incest warning:

1) We kinda figured that if the fic is tagged Sam Winchester/Dean Winchester, you could do the math yourself.

2) There is zero agreement on what counts as “incest.”

2A - In my state, first cousins can marry; they’re not legally incestuous. In the state next door, they’re too closely related to marry. (But their     marriages don’t vanish if they visit the state.)

2B - Are stepsibling relationships incest? Are they incest if they were stepsiblings for a few years but then their parents divorced?

2C - Family relations in non-US cultures have entirely different ideas of what “too closely related for romantic relationships” mean

2D - And that’s before we get into scifi/fantasy settings, where the archive would no doubt use the same guideline it does for “underage” - meaning, “this is only relevant to normal humans.”

2E - Selfcest wtf?

3) An “incest” warning is never going to cover all the things antis believe it should, because it wouldn’t be required for “sworn brothers” and the like.

4) Nobody on the inside wants the hassle of retroactively requiring a warning tag on fics that shipped a pairing that later turned out to be related. Luke/Leia was a big ship for the first few years of Star Wars…” /End ID]

basically: incest is cool, actually /s

[age-of-discourse]

“It’s just fiction,” yes but it’s a fictional depiction of a real thing that happens to and traumatizes real children.

Why do you think putting minors in danger is all cute and hot?

[age-of-discourse]

fic moderation IS NOT comparable to:

the fucking holocaust

police brutality

puritanism

censorship

homophobia

if you think that banning CHILD PORN is oppression then you're a fucking pedo

[age-of-discourse]

“tumblr is great except for…”

the neo-nazis? the violent misogynists? the white supremacists? the glorification of mass murderers? the blogs committed to telling marginalized people to commit suicide? the pedophiles?

“…the sjws.”

ah, yes, clearly it’s the marginalized people trying to get rights. they are the problem here. because they’re occasionally overzealous. or something.

[age-of-discourse]

proshippers: “why would you put ‘people who consume problematic media uncritically dni’ in your caard? it’s so vague!”

also proshippers: “oh, you love h.omestuck? so you must like and approve of everything its creator has ever depicted uncritically? hypocrite! hypocrite!”

[age-of-discourse]

whenever the "is fictional child porn harmful" debate comes up i think about the time a sexologist who specializes in pedophilia did an AMA on reddit and someone asked him that and he was like "yes absolutely. it shouldnt exist"

[age-of-discourse]

if fiction doesn’t affect reality, then why are many proshippers also pro-paraphiles, especially the Big Three? (clarification on the readmore bc may contain genuinely distressing content)

Big Three meaning: pedophilia, zoophilia, necrophilia

[age-of-discourse]

“So you’re telling me that I should just block everyone I disagree with??”

Yeah. You don’t need to view people you dislike. You have no business trying to change the minds of strangers - It would be very mentally exhausting for everyone involved. The block button exists for a reason. It’s not a “echo chamber” to block people online, and let’s be honest, would you even listen to someone else’s opinion if it didn’t match yours anyway? Probably not, I’ve never seen a proshipper sit down and actually listen to the points of antishippers for longer than a second. 

[age-of-discourse]

“that ‘your fav is a lesbian transman blog is horseshoe theory!’“ no, you just can’t recognize r.adfem/t.erf thinking. one of the posts in the pinned post deliberately misgender trans men and trans women (”no males”). the blog is clearly targeting the t.erf mindset that ‘trans men are lost lesbians!’ please learn t.erf/r.adfem ideology

[age-of-discourse]

For those unaware of how CA:NWO's title props up a deadly antisemitic conspiracy

The NWO conspiracy theory can be found in the online chatter of fringe conspiracy theorists. While the associated rhetoric within these online groups can appear innocuous at first, this conspiracy theory presents a real-world danger, as it promotes a fatalistic worldview for adherents, possibly inciting them to commit violence against communities, infrastructure, and individuals deemed complicit in the NWO’s implementation. This cabal narrative is commonly associated with other anti-Semitic conspiracy theories that claim Jewish culpability, alleging that they are behind the orchestration of the NWO, leading to an increased danger towards Jewish communities. 

[age-of-discourse]

Captain America: New World Order will be released May 3, 2024.

[age-of-discourse]

kinda knew that shipcourse discord server was gonna end in disaster