Text
Q: you spend so much time in laboratory, in surrounding of lots of chemicals and reactives. Do you have appeal for toxicomany?
Comic for ask(Reverse: 1999 | Art Ask [OC & Canon]). Hope you enjoy!
29 notes
·
View notes
Text

you're the only one who understands me mr strobbery
48K notes
·
View notes
Text
*People sharing their real lived experience with how BDSM harmed them* This shit-for-brains moron: “BLOCK these EVIL RADICAL FEMINISTS with their EVIL BELIEFS about NOT WANTING BRAIN DAMAGE!!!”
————————————————

452 notes
·
View notes
Text
people here are like “you’re not immune to propaganda” and “abusers will gaslight you and make you think you deserve to be hurt” in one post and in the next they’re like “well if a person wants to be beaten to a pulp then there’s nothing wrong with it! there’s no way this could be part of an unhealthy relationship and getting pleasure out of hurting your partner is A-ok, stop kink shaming.”
3K notes
·
View notes
Text
they thought the 11 year old girl was the one being assaulted apparently because of how the image was cropped.
a transgender person has abducted and sexually assaulted a child, but the problem is the deadnaming. Can't make this up
921 notes
·
View notes
Text
wachin porno and some bitch with a deathly hallow's tattoo is gettin dp'd by some trannies, call that reparations
12K notes
·
View notes
Text
“Lolita isn’t a perverse young girl. She’s a poor child who has been debauched and whose senses never stir under the caresses of the foul Humbert Humbert, whom she asks once, ‘how long did [he] think we were going to live in stuffy cabins, doing filthy things together…?’ But to reply to your question: no, its success doesn’t annoy me, I am not like Conan Doyle, who out of snobbery or simple stupidity preferred to be known as the author of “The Great Boer War,” which he thought superior to his Sherlock Holmes. It is equally interesting to dwell, as journalists say, on the problem of the inept degradation that the character of the nymphet Lolita, whom I invented in 1955, has undergone in the mind of the broad public. Not only has the perversity of this poor child been grotesquely exaggerated, but her physical appearance, her age, everything has been transformed by the illustrations in foreign publications. Girls of eighteen or more, sidewalk kittens, cheap models, or simple long-legged criminals, are baptized “nymphets” or “Lolitas” in news stories in magazines in Italy, France, Germany, etc; and the covers of translations, Turkish or Arab, reach the height of ineptitude when they feature a young woman with opulent contours and a blonde mane imagined by boobies who have never read my book. In reality Lolita is a little girl of twelve, whereas Humbert Humbert is a mature man, and it’s the abyss between his age and that of the little girl that produces the vacuum, the vertigo, the seduction of mortal danger. Secondly, it’s the imagination of the sad satyr that makes a magic creature of this little American schoolgirl, as banal and normal in her way as the poet manqué Humbert is in his. Outside the maniacal gaze of Humbert there is no nymphet. Lolita the nymphet exists only through the obsession that destroys Humbert. Herein an essential aspect of a unique book that has been betrayed by a factitious popularity.”
— Vladimir Nabokov (tr. Brian Boyd), Apostrophes (1975)
74K notes
·
View notes
Text
how it feels to headcanon that one gnc female character who everyone thinks is nonbinary as a gender critical radfem

31 notes
·
View notes
Text
my problem with most age gap discourse isn't that i don't think it's creepy that so many middle aged celebrities chose to date exclusively women under 25, it's more that people think the issue is that the women is "basically a child" and not the actual issue of "dating a skinny white young woman is still a status symbol for rich people" because acting like older people are unfuckable is only feeding into the issue.
12K notes
·
View notes
Text
lesbians pictured in propaganda magazine, december 1999.
3K notes
·
View notes