ameliorator

[ameliorator]

May Covid-19 be one of the greatest PSYOP ever? Additional evidence from the Italian experience.

Dear friends,

here I am with another open letter: its aim is to contribute with some reflections on what is going on in Italy, while also trying to analyze the available information on the drug treatments currently tested against Covid-19.

Once again, I choose to focus on official sources and mainstream news (with marginal exceptions), a technique which allows me to show clearly that everything we have to know in order to question the official narrative is in plain sight: as I keep on repeating, there is really no need nor time to be wasted in the swamp of those who only indulge in attacking each other in the dichotomy “conspiracy theorist - debunker”.

Divide et impera is one of the main strategies used by rulers for millennia, so we should make an effort in order to escape the trapping effect of such mindset.

Before it’s too late, I would like to thank you all for the conversations we had in the last weeks: they helped me a lot and continued to do so even when the flow of critically constructive comments from you on my previous text was over.

When all the arguments were discussed with you, I kept on questioning the solidity of my interpretation.

I realized that the anger I was feeling for what I perceive as a great injustice was obfuscating my view while writing, so I was not as precise as I should have been.

As a partial justification, the previous text was published as a rough draft. I was tired of postponing, I thought I had no time to keep on re-writing it. I might resort to the same justification here, but I do hope to make less mistakes.

I am aware I was not clear enough in some parts: for instance, when I mentioned the process of using the “backdoor” to move sequentially from an administrative act to an ordinary law I did not stress that the lack of constitutional legitimacy of the adopted measures could eventually lead to their overturn by the Constitutional Court (but all those who know Italy at least a bit could easily forecast that there would be some gray area for abuse during the period before the final ruling of the court).

Alas! This should have been expressed with more precision: I humbly admit my fault.

There might have been some misinterpretations in other parts of the text, but time will tell.

Up to now and to a large extent, I haven’t found any strong proof against the validity of what previously written1.

1. To those who are (still) scared: a case for drug treatments

In my previous letter I asked you to stop for a moment concentrating exclusively on the virus and to pay attention to everything that was going on around it after its outbreak: in other words, to use a holistic approach in order to focus on the big picture and all the potential repercussions of this state of emergency on what we used to consider as “normal”.

When temporarily taking the virus out of the equation, I went a tad too far in the process of distancing from it and I made a big mistake, by means of underestimating some crucial pieces of widely available information which might prove to be fundamental to “solve the enigma”.

I am no expert and I have no presumption to have become one overnight: I just want to keep on following the method of questioning everything which is contradictory in the official narrative, using mere logic and common sense as the main tools.  

When I pointed my finger at the risks and side effects of experimenting those treatments with pharmaceutical drugs for malaria and Ebola on patients diagnosed with Covid-19, I was only highlighting the potentially adverse outcomes.

Well, how partial was that limited attitude of stressing only the negative sides, what a tricky effect was generated by the tension of being under house arrest (paired with my mostly “automated” attitude in advocating for the age-old solution of boosting the immune system in natural ways rather than becoming addicted to pharmaceutical drugs)!

With this in mind, the perspective that I should have chosen on this matter was supposed to be the contrary.

For those who prefer not to trust the natural paths of healing and preventing diseases, and/or for those who are still in the “fear & psychosis” loop of this Covid-19, there is a strong case for drug treatments as a viable alternative to the compulsory vaccination, which is a core argument of the official narrative.

It might be needless to remark that ad-hoc treatments for whatever disease, with specific drugs according to the specific preconditions of any specific individual represent the safest way to get the situation under control.

On the other end, a widespread and indiscriminate vaccination is based simply on inoculating the virus in everyone, without any differentiation based on individual risks and with plenty of side effects on the immune system (especially if it’s already debilitated): a potential disaster in the making.

Knowing that all the viruses mutate (and coronaviruses are not an exception), there might be endless vaccination campaigns for booster shots and not simply one: might this be a reason why among the ubiquitous funding activities of the main backer of vaccines globally you can find conspicuous grants awarded to develop nanotechnologies like the “microneedle array patch” – for use in  “house-to-house campaigns via administration by minimally-trained personnel”?  

You can follow all the links to that foundation’s website included in this article and check by yourself the awarded grants.

Later in this text we will see the main drug treatments which are being tested at the moment, but let’s start with a first consideration on the most promising of the lot and surely the most debated recently (due to this, it will also get the lion’s share here).

As it appears, one of the best available drugs used in treatments for Covid-19 (let’s not forget that this “disease” is caused by what is said to be an isolated novel coronavirus called SARS-CoV-2) is chloroquine2, a drug with antiviral effects whose effectiveness on treating coronaviruses was supposed to be known by the health authorities and the medical community at least since 2006, especially due to the fact that in 2005 it was successfully demonstrated in vitro that “chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus [a.k.a. SARS-CoV-1] infection and spread”.

We are talking about an inexpensive generic drug with antiviral effects, defined as a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread 15 YEARS AGO!

If this and other drug treatments were confirmed to be safe and the already positive trend of their successful use was corroborated by additional evidence, the magnitude of lies and deception to push forward the insane and nonsensical measures adopted up to now would really be unprecedented.

You already know that I strongly refuse getting stuck in partisan views while dealing with such complex phenomena, so I don’t want to take sides on the topic in an infantile way, like they are doing in the U.S.A..

In that country, a combination of hydroxychloroquine (a derivative of chloroquine, which has antiviral effects) + azythromicin (an antibiotic) + zinc sulfate (a dietary supplement) was campaigned by their president like a promisingly effective treatment (he went to the point of defining it a “game-changer”), igniting the foreseeable smear campaign of the US mainstream media against him by means of discrediting the drug treatment he is sponsoring3.

In other words: it’s about the typical partisan game of blaming the adversary, not about a thorough investigation to be started with an impartial view on the effectiveness of the treatment (which should be the basics of journalism).

Putting aside any political affiliation, I would like you to do your own objective reflections on what is stated in this article and in the included video interview.

For those who are still skeptical, let’s be clear as usual: I don’t need to convince anyone to refuse vaccines.

If you believe that they are effective and you know all the risks and side effects, you could get 10 shots of the most exotic vaccines every day and I wouldn’t care at all.

The issue here is that you can’t force everyone to get vaccinated with compulsory mass programs, because this is an unlawful prevarication on those who refuse vaccines on solid grounds of widely available natural or pharmaceutical alternatives and clear trends on the characteristics of the deceased: in the worst-case scenario, conscientious exemptions should be granted.

Let’s not get caught in the rigid dichotomy Pro-vaccine VS Anti-vaccine: it’s futile and counterproductive.  

Once again, remember divide et impera.

Instead of wasting time in the swamp of opposed factions obsessed by dogmatic assertions, let’s try to achieve to a transparent and objectively informed freedom of choice4.

2. Is it really only about drugs with antiviral, antibiotic, anti-inflammatory and anticoagulant effects?

Up to now, besides the 2005 study and the 2006 article on The Lancet, there are many noteworthy elements on the efficacy of the drug with antiviral effects chloroquine and its derivative hydroxychloroquine5 (as we have already seen, especially in combination with an antibiotic called azythromycin and zinc sulfate) while treating patients diagnosed with Covid-19: you can read the recommendations in an article from Chinese researchers published on Nature or the results of a controlled clinical study conducted by IHU-Méditerranée Infection in Marseille, France.

A clinical trial comparing hydroxycloroquine with another antiviral (used against HIV) is being conducted in the Asan Medical Center in Seoul, South Korea6.

Another well known trial is ORCHID: a multicenter, blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial in the scope of the National Institutes of Health in the US.

2 clinical trials are also ongoing in Italy.

In the database ClinicalTrials.gov you can currently find 52 clinical trials and 150 clinical trials which involve the use of cloroquine and hydroxychloroquine, respectively. It is worth noticing that 48 clinical trials include both hydroxychloroquine and the already mentioned antibiotic azythromycin.

After an emergency use authorization was issued by the FDA, chloroquine phosphate and hydroxychloroquine sulfate are currently being stockpiled by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Please note that tens of millions of doses have been and will be donated by pharmaceutical companies, so neither big money nor profiteering are involved in this solution.

In India, one of its major producers, hydroxychloroquine has been recommended by the National Task force for COVID-19, constituted by Indian Council of Medical Research as a preventive treatment for all the healthcare workers and people who are in contact with confirmed laboratory cases. After the spike in the orders for chloroquine and hydroxichloroquine, India banned its export.

Greece is also stockpiling chloroquine phosphate and there is a plan of producing this inexpensive generic drug in Greek facilities.

South Africa has also received a donation from a major local pharmaceutical company of chloroquine phosphate imported from India.

In the Italian mainstream news, a recent article shows the first positive results of being treated with hydroxycloroquine at home. The roughly translated title of the article is: “Coronavirus - From North to South 1039 patients treated with hydroxychloroquine at home. The point on the experimentation: "Slump of hospitalizations"”.

The anti-Ebola drug remdesivir (sponsored as well by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases in the U.S.A.) is an antiviral being tested and considered as having potential in treating patients infected with the virus SARS-CoV-2, due to the fact that it was found to be working against SARS-CoV-1 and MERS-CoV (other viruses of the same Coronoviridae family).

It is being tested in 2 clinical trials in Italy, run by the same company which produces that drug.

In the database ClinicalTrials.gov you can currently find 19 clinical trials which involve the use of remdesivir.

Other kinds of drugs are being tested as treatments, especially against the severe pulmonary complications which are induced by the virus (let’s keep in mind that its given full name is Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome - Coronavirus - 2).

One complication which caused a series of serious problems among the patients, namely pulmonary embolism (also referred to as pulmonary thrombosis) is presumably to be cured in a “traditional” way: the Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco approved the use of heparin, commonly prescribed for the treatment of blood clotting in humans.

No big surprise here: we are talking about an anticoagulant to be used against thrombi (known colloquially as a blood clots), an inexpensive solution that can prevent this complication from escalating .

The most harmful and deadly complication is pneumonia, almost always resulting in ARDS (Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome): therefore, some drugs are tested to address a complication which was observed in the majority of patients (97.1% of cases) in Italy, according to the latest report by the Istituto Superiore di Sanità (April 29).

One of the most efficient is an anti-arthritis drug called tocilizumab, in Italy firstly used in an ongoing clinical trial in 27 Italian study locations, led by an expert from the Istituto nazionale per lo studio e la cura dei tumori - fondazione Giovanni Pascale in Napoli, which is known internationally as National Cancer Institute of Naples.

This anti-inflammatory drug blocks some proteins called cytokines, whose increased levels cause inflammation and may lead to organ failures and a spike of mortality.

Since there is plenty of cases involving the so-called cytokine storm syndrome among the patients diagnosed as infected with SARS-CoV-2, it makes complete sense to use such an anti-inflammatory drug in their pharmacological treatments (as clearly explained in this publication on The Lancet).

The treatment with tocilizumab proved to be effective against pneumonia and ARDS in 77 % of the cases in a study conducted in Brescia (one of the main hotbeds in Italy7), moreover in a hospital which is not even one of the 27 study locations of the already mentioned main clinical trial in Italy (out of 3 in place at the moment).

In the database ClinicalTrials.gov you can currently find 32 clinical trials which involve the use of tocilizumab.

Another anti-inflammatory drug which is very similar to tocilizumab is sarilumab (the main difference appears to be that they are produced by different corporations), also tested against pneumonia and ARDS: like the former, it is based on human monoclonal antibodies against IL-6 receptor and it is used as an anti-arthritis drug.

This drug is being tested now in 2 clinical trials in Italy.

In the database ClinicalTrials.gov you can currently find 12 clinical trials which involve the use of sarilumab.

Again for what concerns pulmonary complications, also colchicine (another anti-inflammatory drug, usually used against gout and Behçet's disease) is being used in 2 clinical trials in Italy at the moment.

An important clinical trial testing colchicine on 6000 participants in an international setting of study locations is led by the Montreal Heart Institute in Canada.

In the database ClinicalTrials.gov you can currently find 9 clinical trials which involve the use of colchicine.

In China they are also testing with apparently great results several natural formulas of the Chinese Traditional Medicine and one of them is considered particularly promising: Lianhuaqingwen, whose anti-inflammatory and antiviral effects against this virus are confirmed in this study (in vitro).

You can also read a very insightful analysis on the response to the current epidemic at an international level, which also highlights the results achieved by medical practitioners with drug treatments up to now.

In the methodology section you can read that “6,227 physicians across all specialties were sampled. The 30 countries included in the sample are United States, Canada, Argentina, Brazil, Mexico, Germany, Italy, UK, France, Spain, Belgium, Netherlands, Sweden, Turkey, Poland, Russia, Finland, Ireland, Switzerland, Austria, Denmark, Norway, Greece, Taiwan, Japan, South Korea, Australia, China, India and Hong Kong”.

The awareness on the positive results of some of those drug treatments sheds an even more sinister light on all the other considerations on the HUGE contradictions in the official narrative which were analyzed in my previous open letter.

Unconstitutional measures to lock the population down and cause “controlled” economic crashes?

Useless face masks and gloves8 to be mandatory on an everyday basis?

Social distancing to become a rule?

Prohibition of mass gatherings9?

A mixture of old-fashioned police abuse and highly technological devices deployed in order to “discipline and punish” the entire population with the pretext of a virus which was reported to be the cause of death of a tiny fraction of it, composed mostly by elderly and sick people?

On top of them all, the constant lobbying to convince the population to wait for a vaccine to be released in order to start a compulsory vaccination (possibly with nanotechnologies which may lead to very disturbing scenarios, as indicated in my previous letter) that could be worse than the disease it is supposed to fight?

When we get the final confirmation of the effectiveness of some of the aforementioned drugs and when the necessary guidelines of approved treatments are in place, do you think we can stop all this nonsense?

3. Patents, or a Coronaviridae family affair

Very interestingly, a few patents on the ways to replicate viruses of the Coronaviridae family are in place: for instance, SARS-CoV-1 was patented in 2007 by the Center for Disease Control in the U.S.A.

No surprise, right? Also the unrelated10 but very well known Zika and Ebola are patented.

Some implications of patenting a disease can be found on an article published by Canada’s public broadcaster CBC which dates back to 2013, related to an application filed by a Dutch research group to get a patent for MERS-CoV, of the Coronaviridae family, which was eventually granted on 15.01.2020.

Strangely enough, one organization which has past ties with the foundation of our “philanthropist” friend11who wants us (but not himself12) to be widely vaccinated holds a patent on what is described as an “attenuated coronavirus comprising a variant replicase gene, which causes the virus to have reduced pathogenicity. The present invention also relates to the use of such a coronavirus in a vaccine to prevent and/or treat a disease”. The patent is related to avian infectious bronchitis virus (IBV), which is in the Coronaviridae family.

There is no direct link here, of course: SARS-Cov-2 is not patented (yet?) and some of the previously mentioned patents relate to other viruses of the Coronaviridae family.

None the less, suspicions start to grow when considering this scenario. As usual, we are just trying to join the dots and we should ask ourselves some questions.

Mine are very simple:

1) What is the rationale behind patenting viruses as a common practice, not only by public institutions but also private companies?

2) What are we supposed to understand when we analyze this trend in patenting several viruses of the Coronaviridae family and then to see the newcomer SARS-CoV-2 becoming such a global treat, to the point of causing prolonged lockdowns and economic crashes at an international scale, pushing forward the agenda for a totalitarian state of surveillance & control and compulsory vaccinations13?

3) If I had to patent (let’s assume for profit and not for the “advancement of knowledge above all nonsense”14) a virus in a group of several viruses which are all related, could I be more interested to make people aware of how to cure that virus and potentially the other members of the same family with some easily available pharmaceutical drugs (maybe with an inexpensive generic drug which is considered to be a potent inhibitor of infection and spread of that virus) or to lobby for a very lucrative15 vaccine which I could produce from the patented virus?

Let’s think about it again, if there is a part of us which still wants to give credit to the nonsensical official narrative or if we are dealing with someone who is still prey of its web of lies: there are other options rather than being locked down or hyper-controlled and/or subject to a series of unconstitutional personal limitations imposed for months while waiting for a worthless vaccine (all viruses mutate and SARS-CoV-2 is not different at all: for instance, there are apparently already 8 strains of this novel coronavirus).

To those who are still panicking and forecasting months or years to be lived in such a nightmare, regardless of the incredible amount of proofs in plain sight against this nonsense: are you scared of getting diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 and escalate to a severe condition?

According to the currently available evidence, you could get a prescription for whatever treatment based on drugs with antiviral, anti-inflammatory, antibiotic, anticoagulant effects is proven to be safe and effective in your case, so you could have an extremely high chance of surviving a disease which is so deadly that in millions of cases it manifests itself (?) in an asymptomatic way and that is proven to kill only a minuscule percentage of the overall population (mostly immunocompromised, i.e. sick and old people).

4. A quick reminder on the reliability of data

It would be of extreme help to get hold of the data of all the people reported as dead with pneumonia, other respiratory diseases, heart attacks, tumors and some other major causes of death since the outbreak of this novel SARS coronavirus: we could compare them with historical charts of the same indicators in the previous years.

My safe bet is that they would show some surprising trends.

As of now, there is a very gripping insight from the president of the Istituto Nazionale di Statistica, whom affirmed in an interview with a catholic newspaper that “ it is worth remembering the data on the death certificates for respiratory diseases. In March 2019 there were 15.189 and the year before there were 16.220. Incidentally, it is noted that they are more than the corresponding number of deaths for Covid (12,352) reported in March 2020.”

What do you think about that?

As remembered several times, every new official report from the Istituto Superiore di Sanità gives us additional confirmations that 96% of the deaths attributed to Covid-19 (SARS-Cov2) in Italy are those of patients having 1 to 3 comorbidities (i.e. severe pre-existing conditions which cause immunodeficiency). The mean age of the overall number of deceased is 79.

This trend is being kept constant for weeks, with minimal variations regardless of the increasing amount of medical records examined.

The latest report is from yesterday (April 29) and takes into consideration 2,351 medical records out of 25,452 deceased.

This information is coming from the main producer of official statistics in Italy and from the leading technical-scientific body of the Italian Health Service.

From a totally different perspective (actually the opposite), the best additional proof to understand how the creepy predictions of millions of deaths don’t make any sense and why the virus is only a pretext in this PSYOP is coming from the US mainstream media.

Let me ask you this: if you were the Center for Disease Control, why the hell would you issue guidelines to add to the Covid-19 death toll even those people who are only PRESUMED to have died because of it, even tough you had no proof because they were NOT TESTED?

The New York Times reported the addition of 3,700 deaths in only one day to the Covid-19 death toll in NY without even questioning it!

Those incomprehensible guidelines from the CDC were slammed elsewhere on the US mainstream media, for instance here.

On top of what was already discussed, here we go with an enormous falsification of data in plain sight (no, better: recommended by the top authorities in that field): is there anything else we need to know?

5. People at high risk

Whenever discussing the detailed statistics of deaths in Italy, both in the previous text and this one, I also wish to clarify that in my interpretation of the current situation I never considered the elderly and the sick as “expendables”.

I am strongly advocating for keeping the most detailed attention to people at high risk, in order for them to be cared about and safe to the highest achievable degree during any outbreak of any viral disease or any other life-threatening situation.

That’s the reason why I feel repulsion for the twisted logic that used the elderly and the sick as a “bait on the hook” when starting the roll-out of the official narrative on this virus: the “authorities” convinced the whole population of the necessity to make a sacrifice and stay home in order to avoid hospitals from being overwhelmed with patients and to prevent the sick and elderly people from dying in that chaos.

That was the starting point, let’s never forget that.

Eventually, when the shortage of beds or equipment (most importantly - they told us - the ventilators) in the hospitals put the medical personnel in the position of taking drastic choices, they always chose the young over the old and/or sick.

Wait, everything was started as a sacrifice to be done by everyone in order to keep the elderly and/or sick safe, and then we let them die due to the lack of “staff and stuff”?

As explained in my previous letter, the lack of beds and personnel could have been surely eased or even eliminated by means of requisitioning all the private clinics from DAY ONE, using the same rationale of the emergency powers which put the entire country under lockdown.

It is crucial to understand that if the already mentioned drug treatments are confirmed to be safe and effective, being intubated can be reverted or even prevented.

Concernedly, in an interview with the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (in German), a member of the German Respiratory Society pushed forward a case against the unrestrained use of ventilators when dealing with respiratory diseases, because the excessive artificial pressure of the oxygen or the amount of the oxygen itself pumped in the lungs of a sedated patient might worsen the situation.

Another case against ventilators while facing the current epidemic is debated among US doctors and explained here.

Let’s be always clear to avoid misinterpretations: there might never be a shortage of ventilators for those who are in real need of them and, in case there is any, the appropriate authorities need to take care of eliminating that lack of medical equipment.

Going back to the epidemic: the main point is to understand whether you can blame this chaos in the healthcare system of some Italian northern regions only on the decades-long process of dismantling, downsizing and privatizing it underwent, or whether the chaos could have been mitigated (or even avoided, as explained above), also by means of testing from the very beginning16 an inexpensive generic drug with antiviral effects which was already available since the 1930s and whose efficacy against the SARS coronavirus (SARS-CoV-1) was internationally known since at least 2005/2006 or its direct derivative, or any other drug with antiviral, anti-inflammatory, antibiotic, anticoagulant effects for any specific condition or complication described before: where are all the health authorities and experts when they are really needed?

Do they want us to understand that they did not know about the 2005 study on that potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread and they did not read that crystalline article on The Lancet?

I am not supposed to consult The Lancet and other similar publications because I am not a professional in this field, but the upper echelons both at national and international level should surely have such habit.

Or am I being too naive here?

Is it so revolutionary to start treating a virus with an antiviral?

Moreover, why didn’t they think from the very beginning about the standard procedures they use when they treat cases of pulmonary embolism (with anticoagulant drugs) or pneumonia and ARDS (with anti-inflammatory drugs)?

Was it only because of the (largely induced) chaos in the hospitals which put the majority of the medical personnel under stress and tension, making them prone to misjudge while being physically overworked and psychically defenseless?

Had we all obtained this clear information from the start, the pretext used to convince people of the necessity of giving emergency powers to the prime minister and being put under lockdown could have been dismantled with ease.

But guess what?

Two months passed at the mercy of “professional conformists” (who are constantly pushing forward the official narrative and silencing all the doubts) of all sorts in the media and “passive conformists” among common people brought the majority of Italians to keep on believing without questioning what seems more and more to have little or no rational ground.

This situation has tragic consequences, but it does not add up when you use mere logic and common sense.

6. “Hey, what is really happening in Italy now”?

A vivid impression is that up to now the key players in this PSYOP created a mass psychosis in the country, then they moved forward and used what they had tested in Italy as a blueprint for other countries.

Through media propagation of alarming disinformation or partial information on the situation in Italy, they lobbied several countries to follow the same path of unconstitutional restrictions imposed to the general population, like a domino effect.

Meanwhile, they keep on conducting an experiment aimed at re-programming people’s minds both individually and socially through an irrational and panic-driven psychosis, generated with the typical method of creating tension and fear by means of exaggerated and contradictory pieces of information which don’t stand the test of a rational analysis (even a superficial one like this).

Of course, I am not inferring here that conditions are the same everywhere, but the patterns up to now have striking resemblances in some major countries.

Luckily, though, not all countries in that lot went as far as Italy in the process of inverting all the basic elements of logic, while violating constitutional laws.

To make it clearer, what do you think about the following? Do you witness something similar in your country?

A few days ago, the Italian prime minister (who seems to act and be perceived like an emperor or a king by the sheeple) used one of his endless press conferences to disseminate the “new word” (i.e. yet another one of the useless administrative acts presumably justifying these unconstitutional measures) for a big announcement: the introduction of a task force (which does not exist in the Italian constitution as a legitimate means, but the rules can be changed/not followed “temporarily” when there is a crisis or a state of emergency, right?) that will take care of the so-called Phase 2 in the process of gradually lifting the lockdown.

Now, bearing in mind the fact that the Parliament counts like nothing these times (not only in Italy, of course), having been blatantly deprived of its legislative power, at least they could have played the card of the inter-ministerial committee, keeping the responsibility inside the same Government which usurped17 the Parliament and violated a few articles of the Italian Constitution, as mentioned several times before.

But it would have been too plain, no?

They want the Italians to be constantly entertained with new and amazing special effects, so they chose 17 UNELECTED individuals to compose the task force.

The prime minister said he would take the “political” responsibility of this choice.

It goes like this: consultants which are not legitimated by nor representing anyone, apparently chosen by the prime minister and his staff (not even the government itself, let alone a parliament deprived of any of its functions), are supposed to decide on behalf of 60 million people!

And do you know who is the chief of this task force?

The former CEO of Vodafone18! Can you believe it?

Q: There is an unprecedented crisis affecting healthcare, economics and politics, so what do you do?

A: The Italian government (no, the prime minister with an administrative act!) outsources the decision-making process related to lifting the lockdown of 60 million citizens to a bunch of consultants led by the former CEO of a telecommunications company.

Is it a bad joke?

To add insult to injury, those aforementioned individuals asked for immunity, as testified by one Italian MP in a parliamentary session in which they were discussing an essential theme like the procrastination of the Olympic games (what?).

Why did they do so? What are the powers being transferred to them? What is their ultimate goal?

This sounds like a putsch: not a violent one and possibly not a permanent one (?), but who needs violence when everyone is already under house arrest?

Of course, like everywhere there is a minority which strongly dissents and reacts: besides the thought-provoking articles which you can get from Italian “antagonist” sources, I was both surprised and relieved when another Italian MP expressed some days ago the same views I shared with you in my open letter published 4 weeks ago (and also in this one).

With this in mind, I hope that we will find the strength to put aside all the divergences which divided us before this huge PSYOP and start organizing ourselves to act collectively in order to get out of this trap.

Sincerely,

Raffaele Amelio

1 Actually, some “fortuitous” coincidences with the current situation found in this publication dating back to 10 years ago and curated by the Rockefeller Foundation and the Global Business Network (please see especially pages 18-25) generate additional suspicions of potential dystopian scenarios, as outlined in the previous letter.

2 Please read on Wikipedia: “Chloroquine was discovered in 1934 by Hans Andersag.[5][6] It is on the World Health Organization's List of Essential Medicines, the safest and most effective medicines needed in a health system.[7] It is available as a generic medication.[1] The wholesale cost in the developing world is about US$ 0.04.[8] In the United States, it costs about US$ 5.30 per dose.[1]”

3 What would you do if you had the choice? Would you give a try to a treatment based on an antiviral which is “a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus [a.k.a. SARS-CoV-1] infection and spread”?

4 On the other hand, to use some irony and breaking it down to the most basic example: I respect your freedom in believing that the vaccine will get you immunized but, if this is the rationale behind your choice, what is your risk in letting me be free to choose whether I want to get immunized or not? You are safe anyway, as you are immunized after your shots of vaccine, right?

5 An article on Nature underlines how the use of chloroquine and its derivative hydroxychloroquine is a part of current treatment guidelines for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and primary Sjögren syndrome.

6 South Korea has 236 deaths attributed to Covid-19 out of 51,276,700 inhabitants (0,000004602 % of the population) after reaching an advanced state of containing the contagion without a lockdown, as clarified by the country’s Foreign Minister in an article published by the World Economic Forum (by the way, do you remember that organization? It was among the organizers of the notorious “Event 201”). I heard some criticism because I used China (deemed “untrustworthy”) as the main reference of a country which was in an advanced state of “containing the contagion”, the latter being the fundamental axiom in the official narrative to justify all the draconian measures adopted. Do you see South Korea as more trustworthy? Most people do. Like China it is in an advanced state of containment and shows an overall mortality (beware, not the case fatality rate!) which is exactly the same as China’s. These results were achieved with a widespread use of technology, but no lockdown.

7 Everything was explained in “Why Lombardy?” in my previous letter, but the connection between mandatory flu vaccination and the INCREASE in the risk of getting infected with a Coronavirus was also confirmed by a study of the US Department of Defense available here.

8 Card taken from a very nice card game released in 1994 to a worldwide success. It’s a funny coincidence, Covid-19 was declared a pandemic on 3/11 in 2020, while after the notorious 9/11 in 2001 everybody was talking about this and this card.

9 Watch the whole video, but pay attention to what he says starting at 17 minutes and 7 seconds and especially when at around 18 minutes he says “mass gatherings may be in a certain sense more optional, so until YOU [please notice, not “we”] are widely vaccinated those might not come back at all”. What kind of authority was granted to that guy so that he can express such views?

10 Zika is in the Flaviviridae family and Ebola in the Filoviridae family.

11 Do you really want to be a friend of this mass murderer who also visited the infamous Epstein’s paedophile island? Is this being philanthropic? This guy should be jailed!

12 See note 9.

13 One striking evidence on people’s great awakening on the compulsory vaccination agenda is that a petition to the US White House on change.org is calling for Investigations Into The "Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation" For Medical Malpractice & Crimes Against Humanity: it has already reached more than 465,000 signatures in 20 days (the goal was 100,000 in a month).

14 If I wanted to achieve that goal, I would rather choose open access and open source as the most suited for advancing knowledge in the most transparent and equitable way.

15 All the major pharmaceutical companies which promised to develop a vaccine saw their market value rise. They are described as being in a race at the moment. Also a series of companies having past or present ties with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, like Inovio (which is also testing a proprietary smart device for intradermal delivery of a vaccine), Moderna, Novavax are already working on a vaccine. If the puppeteers succeed with imposing a compulsory vaccination, those companies’ profits will skyrocket: if you just want to “follow the money” and focus your attention on who is going to benefit from the virus, this is a very easy case to understand.

16 They did so at a later stage, as previously reported. The complete list is here.

17 By means of adding the legislative to its executive power and thereby breaking the trias politica, or separation of powers.

18 Isn’t it a strange coincidence to witness the current solidification of the initiatives against the installation of antennas for the fifth generation of digital cellular networks (there is a national alliance against it, Alleanza Italiana Stop 5G, part of a larger European alliance) which will create serious issues to people’s immune systems due to the increase of electrosmog, one one hand, and the choice of someone who worked as a CEO for a telecommunications company (and was constantly cheerleading for 5G) as the chief of the illegitimate and unelected task force, on the other?

This work is licensed under a

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

[ameliorator]

May Covid-19 be one of the greatest PSYOP ever? Some reflections on what is happening in Italy. [rough draft]

Disclaimer:

This article is just rought draft, so by definition it is incomplete.

I was initially asked by some foreign friends about what is happening in Italy: therefore, I decided to put some information in the same space, rather than having bits and pieces scattered all over the place.

This is not an academic paper, it is more like an open letter.

Its main goal is to push the reader to ask questions, questions, questions: nobody should presume to be a carrier of truth, but we all need to act humbly and cooperatively now.

You will notice that some concepts are repeated throughout the short text like a mantra: this is a deliberate devise, as those concepts are the most striking evidence supporting the analysis.

With this in mind, all the sections need additional depth and references to give breadth and strength to the research: needless to remark, any contribution from all of you is more than welcome.

If someone who reads this text by chance wants to wear the sordid mask of the debunker in order to attack me as a conspiracy theorist, he/she needs to note that all the sources (with a couple of exceptions) are either official pubblications, press releases, entries on Wikipedia or articles from the mainstream media.

Avoiding “antagonist” authors or websites is a precise choice to make crystal clear that all the information you need is in plain sight on your average news sources, and to avoid wasting time in useless diatribes.

The driving force behind the following text is just common sense, paired with an attitude which can be easily defined with the words of the controversial Timothy Leary: «To think for yourself you must question authority».

Please do the same all the time, all of you.

Thank you!

1. An introduction (or the core of this brief article?)

While we are several weeks into this unprecedented situation, there are too many elements that don’t make sense in the official narrative: a further analysis driven by mere common sense and rationality is needed.

Let’s use a holistic approach while dealing with what everyone who still keeps some lucidity in these dire times would eventually come to understand as an unprecedented act of psychological warfare, that may lead to unwanted (at least by a minority of people who still has a tendency to think independently) changes and transformations, which we are supposed to clarify and debate with attention before it is too late.

Therefore, let’s try for a few minutes to get far away from the media-fuelled compulsively obsessed state of mind which keeps all of us focused only on the origins of the virus ("Is it a natural occurrence? Is it the outcome of a chemical warfare attack coming from the U.S.A or China? ___add here your favorite version___?”) and its supposedly extreme deadliness.

The starting point for this thesis is that any situation of “emergency” or “crisis” is the perfect precondition to arbitrarily change the rules of the game.

We will clearly see how marginal in the equation is the virus itself, with its very low case fatality rate and mortality rate.

As of now, we will only focus on what is happening in Italy. Let’s go straight to the point: the draconian measures adopted are absolutely disproportionate, when compared to the seriousness of the current risk. Besides that, they are unconstitutional.

In fact, the series of “DPCM - Decreti del Presidente del Consiglio dei Ministri (prime minister’s decrees)” are mere administrative acts which, upon the pretext of the emergency caused by the virus, violate at least the articles 16, 25 and 77 of the Italian constitution.

Unfortunately this is becoming even more sinister, as the government added to the aforementioned “prime minister’s decree” some so-called “decreti-legge” (decrees-law). Therefore, while the violation of article 77 of the Italian constitution is no longer the case, the scenario looks even worse. Let’s read a quickly translated excerpt of the Wikipedia article about the topic (which is in Italian only, of course):

« In the Italian legal system a decree-law (plural decrees-law and abbreviated in dl), also written decree law, is a provisional regulatory act having force of law, adopted in extraordinary cases of necessity and urgency by the Government, pursuant to art. 77 of the Constitution of the Italian Republic. It comes into force immediately after publication in the Official Gazette of the Italian Republic, but the effects produced are temporary, because the decrees-laws lose their effectiveness if Parliament does not convert them into law within 60 days of their publication».

The risk is that these totalitarian measures which Italians are experiencing at the moment, first introduced with an administrative act (the “prime minister’s decree”, emergency-based and basically worthless), then strengthened with another temporary measure (the “decree-law”, valid only for 60 days), might be finally converted into ordinary laws.

This might mean that some important aspects of the way Italians live their lives might be modified for good: beware, not according to the standardized procedures of the legislative process, but through the aforementioned stratagem (through the “backdoor”, so to say).

If you want to have a look at the series of DPCMs and Dls related to the Covid-19, please check the “Gazzetta Ufficiale”.

You would justify this scenario and the lockdown of an entire country in case of a plague, a major war or some alien attack: on the other hand, the culprit is a virus which up to now killed around 3,300 people in China, a country which counts around 1,435,000,000 inhabitants according to the 2017 Census (0.000002 per cent of the population. Yes, you read it right: there are 5 zeros after the comma).

Now, you can tell me that the law enforcement in China is what you expect from an authoritarian state and that the measures which were adopted in order to achieve the so-called “containment” of the contagion are even stricter than in Italy, with drones, robots, face recognition, tracking of the population via phone apps and all sort of available technology for surveillance and control.

An Orwellian nightmare, you would say, but again: for the risk posed by a virus which eventually would bring a few thousand deaths out of more than 1 and half a billion people?

This is nonsensical, and there is a growing number of scientists who is at least puzzled by the panic generated by this novel coronavirus.

If you want to watch a somehow “watered-down” (because it was not shot in Wuhan, the epicenter of the first contagion) version of what is described above, please have a look at this Japanese short documentary on the major Chinese city of Nanjing (taken from an Italian news website, but luckily the video is in the original language with English subtitles).

Moreover, it is now common knowledge that there are potentially millions of asymptomatic carriers, while millions more both in China and outside could have been affected by the virus at least between October 2019 (don’t forget that the virus has “19” for 2019 in its name, not “20” for 2020) and the beginning of January 2020, totally unaware of it.

So what’s the problem now? The ruling elites tell us through their spokespersons in the government (starting from the prime minister) that we have to prevent the contagion from spreading because the Italian healthcare system is collapsing. Why is that? Is it because of this specific disease? Clearly not.

Is it because of more than 3 decades of widespread adoption of the western neoliberal dogma which led to privatizations, shrinking and closure of hospitals, extreme cost-cutting and reduction of personnel? Well, yes.

If you are familiar with the Italian language or you are keen to use a translator, please have a look at this report. To have an additional reference on the effects of such phenomenon in a different country, you can read a much shorter newspaper article here.

After this pretty long introduction, let’s have a quick look at some aspects of this situation.

2. “Simulations”

In recent years, the ruling elites that shape the dominant narrative are telling us that it is necessary to be ready for a pandemic: besides the constant recommendations (which inspire in me more than a suspicion, but that’s only my humble reaction), they indulge in exercises and simulations to assess the potential readiness of governments and international organizations in dealing with such a scenario.

Recently, a lot of talking surrounded the simulation dubbed “Event 201”, organized by the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security in September 2019: beyond all the so-called conspiracy theories, at least some doubts arise about the timing and the chosen theme.

While their previous major simulation on the preparation to react to a pandemic as a result of a natural occurrence or bacteriological war is from 2005 (2-3 years AFTER the emergence of SARS, which – for those who still remember the propaganda machine at the time- was advertised as potentially leading to millions of deaths, but eventually resulted in a few thousands), this last simulation was carried out and published only a couple of months BEFORE the spread of Covid-19.

Macroscopic coincidences like this cannot be dismissed light-heartedly, especially when even kids nowadays know that one of the richest individuals in the world is actively both predicting scenarios AND prescribing solutions against pandemics.

Keeping on using some old-fashioned common sense and rationality as our only guides, we might ask ourselves: are these the acts of a good-hearted “philanthropist” or the very interested maneuvers of someone who is having a huge conflict of interest, being involved in vaccines development and SURVEILLANCE for decades with his Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation? Going back to the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security (and, by the way, am I the only one who reads on their website “Johns Hopkins - Bloomberg School of Public Health”? We are talking about one of the richest individuals in the world – well, yet ANOTHER one1), you can compare the 2005 simulation (“Atlantic Storm”) with the 2019 simulation (the already mentioned “Event 201”).

A video recap of the latter is here.

Isn’t that strange that they constantly refer to the possibility of a deliberate release of a virus generating a pandemic? Pretty strange, isn’t it?

Please ask questions and make your own considerations, I am not adding anything else on this subject for now.

3. Some extremely quick historical references to similar pandemics

The main point here is to give some background to the repressive measures adopted while dealing with the current pandemic and hypothesize the potential scenarios2 in which all or some of them are maintained in the phase following the “containment” (see above for the stratagem used in Italy, which might lead to major changes in the Italian legislation by means of using the backdoor: this is completely anti-democratic).

In this regard, a crucial consideration is the following: the 1918 pandemic (the "Spanish flu3") caused between 17,000,000 and 50,000,000 deaths (other sources speak of 100,000,000), while so far we can use data from China (which is in an advanced phase of the "containment", even if it is not yet "out of danger") for an incomplete comparison with this Covid-19: in the Asian country, we are dealing with around 3,300 deaths out of around 1,435,000,000 Chinese citizens registered in the 2017 census (0.000002 % of the population). You will read these stats on the deaths caused by the novel coronavirus in China over and over again: this is done on purpose, as a red alert for our brains.

With this simple consideration in mind, we can easily realize that we are already going too far with this unprecedented experiment of transformation and individual and social re-programming, under the pretext of the virus.

A little glimpse on the last two decades: had not the SARS, the MERS and the 2009’s iteration of H1N1 been described as pandemics “with potentially millions of deceases” when they magically appeared?

In this regard, let’s use again Wikipedia and read about the 2009’s iteration of H1N1 (the so-called “swine flu”), which had both the highest case fatality rate and mortality rate among the aforementioned pandemics: “Meanwhile, some studies estimated that 11 to 21 per cent of the global population at the time – or around 700 million to 1.4 billion people (out of a total of 6.8 billion) – contracted the illness. This was more than the number of people infected by the Spanish flu pandemic,[6][11] but only resulted in about 150,000 to 575,000 fatalities for the 2009 pandemic.[12] A follow-up study done in September 2010 showed that the risk of serious illness resulting from the 2009 H1N1 flu was no higher than that of the yearly seasonal flu.[13] For comparison, the WHO estimates that 250,000 to 500,000 people die of seasonal flu annually.[8] ”

This seems pretty crystalline, right?

4. “... but hospitals are collapsing!”

The concept of “herd immunity” heralded in the UK hypothesized a scenario of millions of serious cases, so this seems to be yet another act of propaganda aimed at instilling fear and panic (please stay focused on what I keep on repeating about China: until now, a mere 0.00002% of the population died. How can everybody ignore that huge elephant in the room?), but in Italy they decided to do quite the opposite: they bring everyone who is showing symptoms (albeit especially acute) to intensive care units, so that the already underfunded and understaffed hospitals collapse.

This is the worst part of playing with people’s lives and emotions: do you think it is a standard procedure to admit everyone who has been infected by the seasonal influenza (albeit severely) to an intensive care unit? The answer is no, due to the limited availability of beds and equipment (which is shrinking for decades, as you can clearly understand with the help of the report mentioned in the introduction).

In the worst case scenario, the infected die in their houses, maybe without even being counted in the statistics of people dying for the seasonal influenza on a yearly basis (and the World Health Organization - not your local conspiracy theorist - estimates that 250,000 to 500,000 people die of seasonal flu annually, as seen above).

Those poor souls might be put into the accounts of other diseases they already have (comorbidities) or simply be accounted as victims of the inescapable process of aging: there is no clear standard on which “box” to use when the calculation of the deceased is performed.

With this in mind, when you create such a panic and you let everyone who is diagnosed with the Covid-19 be admitted to intensive care, what do you think you will get? A total CHAOS.

Besides, did anybody ask the relevant authorities what are the risks and collateral effects of testing drugs for Ebola or malaria on patients affected with Covid-19?

I would be extremely curious to have a full report on the effects on people who are already sick and/or old, besides merely knowing what are the ongoing experiments.

But, of course, they are feeding all of us with the dramatic story about the pain and suffering of Italian people and the collapsing healthcare system in Italy, without providing even the slightest motivation for this state of things.

Beware, I am not saying that the healthcare system is not actually collapsing: I am just inferring that this might be INDUCED.

Why would you otherwise justify the fact that our “heroic government” did not proceed with a requisition of all the private clinics/hospitals in the country from DAY ONE of the emergency?

Weren’t we all supposed to make sacrifices for the common good, for the sick and the elderly, for our overwhelmed medical personnel?

Well, apparently “some animals are more equal than others”.

Now they are talking about this topic of requisitioning and some regions got ready or are getting ready for such a “bothering” task: why so late? Why don’t we ask such a question?

As we will see in a very clear way in a moment, the average age of people accounted for having died since the outbreak and up to now in Italy is around 80 years. Besides, all the cases of deaths under the age of 60 are related to one or more comorbidities (when it comes to the statistics, let’s state once more that it seems that there is no clear agreement among at least the bulk of the major European countries when differentiating between deaths with Covid-19 and deaths due to Covid-19, i.e. HEALTHY people who died because they were infected with the virus).

For this reason, at the moment we can only rely on the analysis of the most precise data available to us: a good example of how crucial is a higher level of detail could be the study on the case fatality rate and characteristics of the deceased performed by the Italian Istituto Superiore di Sanità4, which you can download and read here. Regular updates can be found here.

What is really striking in this study is the plain fact that only 6 out of 481 deaths in that sample had no comorbidity (1.2%). This means that  98.8% of the deceased were having from 1 to 3 comorbidities (pre-existing health conditions). The mean age was 78.5.

In other words, those people were old and/or sick (suffering from 1 to 3 diseases), meaning at high risk of dying for whatever infection/additional disease pairing with their pre-existing health conditions. This is a clear and undeniable statement, which leaves little room to the provoked scare of “millions of deaths”. Talking about millions, do we really understand how many millions of people could have already been infected with the virus (and come out of it) in the months before the so-called "emergency"? They might have confused it with bronchitis, pneumonia, a severe form of seasonal influenza or simply not have noticed it because it presented itself in an asymptomatic form.

Even the Center for Disease Control and Prevention in the U.S.A. indirectly admitted that the virus was already around for quite a long time (at least from the period of the last seasonal influenza, which is what matters now) and they might have miscategorized it: this, in turn, led to accusations from the Chinese government to the U.S.A. (but that’s another story and we won’t deal with it at the moment).

5. 60 million people under house arrest

What is the outcome of such an orchestrated mass psychosis? There are 60 million Italians who currently slaughter each other (on social networks and from the safety of their houses, of course) to defend their theses on the origin of the virus, offending each other for being either a conspiracy theorist or a dumb brainless individual, basically erasing each other’s position in a useless chatter (while wasting useful time and energies which should be devoted to figure out how to stop this).

Everyone is under house arrest, of course (because going out to buy groceries and medicines is NOT freedom of movement): in the meantime, the unconstitutional measures go from a restriction to another, inspiring (or not really?) other countries to do the same.

Theoretically we could (well, ahem, practically we are forced to) accept, obviously for a limited period of time, the prohibitions of gathering and meeting in "public" places, but forbidding a solitary walk in the countryside is unjustified, illogical and intolerable.

All of this is forced upon us due to the state of emergency that is based on provoked fear, which clashes with the basic common sense and especially with the already mentioned data from the Istituto Superiore di Sanità: if the statistics follow the same trend (and there is currently no indication that this will change), in more than 95% of the cases, the elderly and sick (with 1 to 3 comorbidities) die, with absolutely negligible figures when it comes to the total numbers of dead people against the overall population (once more, let’s keep on repeating it as a mantra, 0.000002% of the population in China died), especially if compared to the absolutely many more deaths per year due to war, famine, other diseases and all sort of accidents.

Once more, do those people die

DUE TO Covid-19

or

WITH Covid-19 AND 1 to 3 comorbidities?

Simple question: are those statistics reliable?

Once more, there are millions of asymptomatic carriers and millions more who might have contracted the disease before the WHO and the other big actors in what seems a big theatre-play gave it a name (as an experiment to prove what I am suggesting here, please ask your loved ones and friends or colleagues who felt sick between November 2019 and January 2020) and used it as a pick to change the "rules of the game". For these reasons, I keep repeating to observe and analyse the whole picture with a holistic approach, but leaving for a moment the origin and supposed deadliness of the virus out of the equation.

I call it psychological warfare because by means of this constant brainwashing the ruling elite keeps us in a cage and verbally fighting one against the other, under the pretext of the virus (which reproduces the classic them/us, bad/good, right/left dichotomies, in this case natural event/bacteriological weapon or, if you are in geopolitics, NATO/SCO), while the puppeteers use their puppets that are “in charge” for governing us to impose a totally unacceptable and unprecedented situation.

Mind you: not for the plague, smallpox, leprosy, world war, a nuclear explosion, aliens (!!!), but for one of the about 40 species of Coronaviridae, with a clear pattern when it comes to the case fatality rate, which is strongly linked to the characteristics of the infected (whether they are old and/or sick) while the mortality rate is even lower (as shown by the case of China up to now).

On top of that, everybody is asking for a vaccine, even if there is little or no doubt that it might prove completely worthless (because viruses keep on mutating, as you can read in whatever official source of your choice).

Isn’t it enough?

6. Why Lombardy?

A lot of people started linking the spread of Covid-19 with the rollout of 5G in Wuhan. I wouldn't go so far as to hypothesize a direct causality.

None the less, even almost 10 years ago, in a press release from 2011, the World Health Organization / International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified radiofrequency electromagnetic fields as possibly carcinogenic to humans.

The mentioned research referred only to the damage of cellphones, at best with the 3G technology (4G was massively deployed only from 2011 onwards): as we are running faster towards the new generation (the 5G itself 5), the link between the damages to the immune system deriving from the continuous exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields and the occurrence of contracting diseases should be clear to everyone. Of course, all the sycophants of Big Pharma and also the pro-technology lobbies will keep on denying it, but as usual time will tell.  

It sounds like a very strange coincidence, but guess where both the Italian company TIM and the well-known Vodafone started the rollout of 5G in Italy? Yes, ladies and gentlemen: Milan (described by Vodafone as the European capital of 5G in the above linked article) and the whole region of Lombardy!

Moreover, and again not hypothesizing a direct causality, guess where is the epicentre in Lombardy? The cities and provinces of Bergamo and Brescia.

What happened there just before the spread of Covid-19, besides the fact that they were graced with this amazing new technology? Well, in those provinces public institutions took care of a mass vaccination against meningitis (they even wanted to clearly highlight that it was for free for those up to 60).

Without articulating the matter with too much depth, let’s keep on using some old-age common sense (or maybe 50 studies?) and realize that even kids (ahem, especially them) know that vaccines have some disturbing side effects when it comes to the immune system.

On top of that, guess what is one the worst and THE largest geographical area in Europe impacted by pollution due to PM 2.5, which causes very well known and documented respiratory diseases? Lombardy (and all the other heavily industrialized parts of Northern Italy, which are showing the highest number of cases)!

Have a look at this official publication by the European Environment Agency and scroll the page for this emblematic figure (pay special attention to the red level). This latter evidence alone would suffice to understand why the virus hit so hard those areas.

All this considered, what do you think about the circumstance of having these high levels of different forms of pollution AND the hotbed of Covid-19 in the same places? I keep on asking myself questions.

7. Positive aspects VS dystopian scenarios

Taking out of the account the incredible restriction of freedom and the nightmarish mass profiling, nobody could underestimate how good is for the environment to temporarily halt all the man-made pollution on such a large scale, and this is something we all should be happy for.

A lot of people are forced to rediscover their family ties, which is surely a great thing.

Moreover, hundreds of thousands are getting used to remote working (which was sort of a taboo topic in Italy until a couple of months ago): this may lead to good opportunities to achieve a better work/life balance, especially for mothers of young kids or for those who can’t afford a caretaker for the elders or any sick member of their families.

Some behavioral changes might be for the good, and we can only be hoping (especially if we are let free to choose, of course) that those traits will stay when the emergency ends.

None the less, there are some heavily dark clouds on the horizon. Are you ready for the dystopian scenarios?

Well, I am sorry: I won’t be your Charon.

As clarified in the disclaimer, I don’t want to get trapped in the counterproductive dichotomy conspiracy theorist/debunker. I am just trying to use my brain and analyse the potential outcomes of the course of actions led by an official narrative which makes no sense (as shown before and as it should be already clear to you, once you start asking questions).

Apologies, but I can’t stop myself from repeating that the keys here are common sense and rationality.

I won’t describe anything in detail, just check for yourself the Real ID project, the ID20206 Alliance, the role of GAVI in setting agendas and shaping policies, especially when it comes to their dream of mandatory vaccines, traceable with a very nice and tiny new system.

Of course, we all hope that no dystopia is going to come true (it really depends on whether we create or not a critical mass of critical thinkers, in my humble opinion) and that one day soon we will all wake up from this nightmare and go back to our “normal” lives: if it’s the contrary, though, please do not say that nobody alerted you!

All the best, my friends!

Sincerely,

Raffaele Amelio

1  Here is a story about another one of our favorite top-10 billionaires, who recently made some additional profits by a stroke of luck (NOT due to insider trading, of course).

2 One easy example to see how they want to make it seem “inevitable”: http://www.ansa.it/amp/sito/notizie/cronaca/2020/03/23/coronavirus-cambia-moduo-autocertificazione.-arrivano-i-droni-per-i-controlli_b6fa411d-89ac-46db-b247 -148735e6eab6.html  

First part of the title: The paper form (to fill and sign and show to the cops in order to justify why you are out of your cage) is changed. Second part of the title: Drones arrive for patrolling. A nice way to communicate it, right?

3 When it comes to the Spanish flu, what a strange case of coincidence (or is it what someone calls “predictive programming”?) one can find in this article on USA Today from December 2019!

4 In another article of the Italian news agency Ansa, referring to a previous study by ISS with less cases (355, on the 17th of March), you can read the following excerpt (translated from the original Italian): «Only 0.8% of the victims had no other pathologies - says Bernabei - while 25% had one, another 25% two and 48% three. And only 10% were under 60 years old. They are the results of an ISS study on 355 medical records of the first victims of the coronavirus. "The fact that photographs the reality well - says the member of the technical scientific committee - is that the real risk factor is that of having a geriatric age and concomitant pathologies, hypertension, ischemic heart disease, diabetes above all, which find fertile ground. This is what explains the excess mortality»

5 The 5G has a peak data rate up to 10 times faster and a connection density per km² up to 1000 times higher than 4G, with a very short reach. In other words, more cells are required and they need to be placed closer to each other than the cells used to support the previous generations. On top of this, think about the fact that the number of connected devices is destined to grow exponentially, with hundreds of millions of smart “things” (in the “magic” world of IoT) just waiting for us to be used by them ;-)

6 https://www.biometricupdate.com/201909/id2020-and-partners-launch-program-to-provide-digital-id-with-vaccines

This work is licensed under a

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License