amplitudmodulada
81 posts
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
Text
#competition? you're not even playing the same sport
2K notes
·
View notes
Text
AO3 Ship Stats: Year In Bad Data
You may have seen this AO3 Year In Review.

It hasnât crossed my tumblr dash but it sure is circulating on twitter with 3.5M views, 10K likes, 17K retweets and counting. Normally this would be great! I love data and charts and comparisons!
Except this data is GARBAGE and belongs in the TRASH.
I first noticed something fishy when I realized that Steve/Bucky â the 5th largest ship on AO3 by total fic count â wasnât on this Top 100 list anywhere. I know Marvelâs popularity has fallen in recent years, but not that much. Especially considering some of the other ships that made it on the list. You mean to tell me a femslash HP ship (Mary MacDonald/Lily Potter) in which one half of the pairing was so minor I had to look up her name because she was only mentioned once in a single flashback scene beat fandom juggernaut Stucky? I call bullshit.
Now obviously jumping to conclusions based on gut instinct alone is horrible practice... but it is a good place to start. So letâs look at the actual numbers and discover why this entire dataset sits on a throne of lies.
Here are the results of filtering the Steve/Bucky tag for all works created between Jan 1, 2023 and Dec 31, 2023:

Not only would that place Steve/Bucky at #23 on this list, if the other counts are correct (hint: they're not), itâs also well above the 1520-new-work cutoff of the #100 spot. So how the fuck is it not on the list? Letâs check out the authorâs FAQ to see if thereâs some important factor weâre missing.
The first thing youâll probably notice in the FAQ is that the data is being scraped from publicly available works. That means anything privated and only accessible to logged-in users isnât counted. This is Sin #1. Already the data is inaccurate because weâre not actually counting all of the published fics, but the bots needed to do data collection on this scale can't easily scrape privated fics so I kinda get it. Weâll roll with this for now and see if it at least makes the numbers make more sense:

Nope. Logging out only reduced the total by a couple hundred. Even if one were to choose the most restrictive possible definition of "new works" and filter out all crossovers and incomplete fics, Steve/Bucky would still have a yearly total of 2,305. Yet the list claims their total is somewhere below 1,500? What the fuck is going on here?
Letâs look at another ship for comparison. This time one thatâs very recent and popular enough to make it on the list so we have an actual reference value for comparison: Nick/Charlie (Heartstopper). According to the list, this ship sits at #34 this year with a total of 2630 new works. But whatâs AO3 say?

Off by a hundred or so but the values are much closer at least!
If we dig further into the FAQ though we discover Sin #2 (and the most egregious): the counting method. The yearly fic counts are NOT determined by filtering for a certain time period, theyâre determined by simply taking a snapshot of the total number of fics in a ship tag at the end of the year and subtracting the previous end-of-year total. For example, if you check a ship tag on Jan 1, 2023 and it has 10,000 fics and check it again on Jan 1, 2024 and it now has 12,000 fics, the difference (2,000) would be the number of "new works" on this chart.
At first glance this subtraction method might seem like a perfectly valid way to count fics, and itâs certainly the easiest way, but it can and did have major consequences to the point of making the entire dataset functionally meaningless. Why? If any older works are deleted or privated, every single one of those will be subtracted from the current year fic count. And to make the problem even worse, beginning at the end of last year there was a big scare about AI scraping fics from AO3, which caused hundreds, if not thousands, of users to lock down their fics or delete them.
The magnitude of this fuck up may not be immediately obvious so letâs look at an example to see how this works in practice.
Say we have two ships. Ship A is more than a decade old with a large fanbase. Ship B is only a couple years old but gaining traction. On Jan 1, 2023, Ship A had a catalog of 50,000 fics and ship B had 5,000. Both ships have 3,000 new works published in 2023. However, 4% of the older works in each fandom were either privated or deleted during that same time (this percentage is was just chosen to make the math easy but itâs close to reality).
Ship A: 50,000 x 4% = 2,000 removed works Ship B: 5,000 x 4% = 200 removed works
Ship A: 3,000 - 2,000 = 1,000 "new" works Ship B: 3,000 - 200 = 2,800 "new" works
This gives Ship A a net gain of 1,000 and Ship B a net gain of 2,800 despite both fandoms producing the exact same number of new works that year. And neither one of these reported counts are the actual new works count (3,000). THIS explains the drastic difference in ranking between a ship like Steve/Bucky and Nick/Charlie.
How is this a useful measure of anything? You can't draw any conclusions about the current size and popularity of a fandom based on this data.
With this system, not only is the reported "new works" count incorrect, the older, larger fandom will always be punished and itâs count disproportionately reduced simply for the sin of being an older, larger fandom. This example doesnât even take into account that people are going to be way more likely to delete an old fic they're no longer proud of in a fandom they no longer care about than a fic that was just written, so the deletion percentage for the older fandom should theoretically be even larger in comparison.
And if that wasn't bad enough, the author of this "study" KNEW the data was tainted and chose to present it as meaningful anyway. You will only find this if you click through to the FAQ and read about the authorâs methodology, something 99.99% of people will NOT do (and even those who do may not understand the true significance of this problem):


The author may try to argue their post states that the tags "which had the greatest gain in total public fanworksâ are shown on the chart, which makes it not a lie, but a error on the viewerâs part in not interpreting their data correctly. This is bullshit. Their chart CLEARLY titles the fic count column âNew Worksâ which it explicitly is NOT, by their own admission! It should be titled âNet Gain in Worksâ or something similar.
Even if it were correctly titled though, the general public would not understand the difference, would interpret the numbers as new works anyway (because net gain is functionally meaningless as we've just discovered), and would base conclusions on their incorrect assumptions. Thereâs no getting around that⊠other than doing the counts correctly in the first place. This would be a much larger task but I strongly believe you shouldnât take on a project like this if you canât do it right.
To sum up, just because someone put a lot of work into gathering data and making a nice color-coded chart, doesnât mean the data is GOOD or VALUABLE.
4K notes
·
View notes
Text
You talk sense into me? That would've been interesting.
4K notes
·
View notes
Text
eddie diaz reading poem after poem after poem looking for the words that describe how he feels. âi will love you if i never see you again, i will love you if i see you every tuesdayâ and ânot to me. not if itâs youâ and âstain them. i donât careâ and âno one has ever known you as i know youâ and âmy heart is so full of you i can hardly call it my ownâ and âi want to do with you what spring does with the cherry treesâ and âitâs still you. itâs still you.â and âi think i wished for you all my lifeâ and âi am prepared to be devastated by youâ and âi would invent god if it made you happyâ and âyour love will be safe with meâ and âyouâll never have to peel your own oranges againâ and âi want you to eat wellâ and âthe goodness inside of you is stronger than my fearâ and âdomine, non sum dignus ut intres sub tectum meum: sed tantum dic verbo et sanabitur anima meaâ and âif you are intolerable let me be the one to tolerate youâ and âeverlasting. deathless.â but none of them are big enough to fit all of his love and so he says buckâs name and prays he knows what those four letters mean.
431 notes
·
View notes
Text
jjjj es muy gracioso el "vino de la nada esto". Literalmente el 90% de las escenas de ellos dos eran ALEJADOS nunca estaban en plano juntos. equals. noooo literalmente siempre estaban en diferentes lugares nunca mostraron algo de cercanĂa entre ellos dos mĂĄs que el primer beso. En el Ășnico momento q le dice por el nombre preferido es cuando le corta. It's a plot point!!!! Literalmente cuando se fue todo a la mierda con taylor le pidiĂł q se mude e hizo lo mismo
0 notes
Text
buck meeting ali during the first big rescue he was partnered up with eddie forâŠâŠ buck explicitly shown as having moved on from abby by coparenting with eddieâŠâŠ buck getting with taylor practically with eddieâs blood still behind his earsâŠâŠ.. buck kissing eddieâs replacement after he no showed their hangoutâŠâŠ. buck saying natalia understands him because of her relationship with death to eddie who literally restarted his heartâŠâŠ buck kissing tommy after trying to blow him up with his mind for an entire episode for taking eddieâs attention awayâŠâŠâŠ much to think about. the love triangle framing may only be becoming overt now but buckâs love life has always been a three person affair
544 notes
·
View notes
Text
EDDIEâS HANDS in 8.05, âMasksâ
+ bonus đș
807 notes
·
View notes
Text









longing for something you can never return to
4K notes
·
View notes
Text
real talk the absolute fucking selfishness of helena diaz to keep eddie out of the loop with the birthday party and the invitations and purposefully not bringing him to sing happy birthday to his son while also making the moment eddieâs been planning for god knows how long less than a 30 seconds video chat is repulsive. fuck you helena. fuck you
3K notes
·
View notes
Text
Helena. He was your baby. Your baby first. Your first baby. And you took. His baby from him. You took your babyâs baby. You took him away. And are rubbing it in his face. That is not your baby. Your baby is in front of you but you wonât recognize that he is your baby because you made him your coparent. Ramon said your baby was the man of the house, and you made him the man of the house. And then you took his baby from him.
2K notes
·
View notes
Text
Helena. He was your baby. Your baby first. Your first baby. And you took. His baby from him. You took your babyâs baby. You took him away. And are rubbing it in his face. That is not your baby. Your baby is in front of you but you wonât recognize that he is your baby because you made him your coparent. Ramon said your baby was the man of the house, and you made him the man of the house. And then you took his baby from him.
2K notes
·
View notes
Text
Helena. He was your baby. Your baby first. Your first baby. And you took. His baby from him. You took your babyâs baby. You took him away. And are rubbing it in his face. That is not your baby. Your baby is in front of you but you wonât recognize that he is your baby because you made him your coparent. Ramon said your baby was the man of the house, and you made him the man of the house. And then you took his baby from him.
2K notes
·
View notes
Text
not to give this show too many flowers but i do think the buck plot is good and fits with his character because he does need praise to live and he also historically has had issues following orders because he will always choose his own impulsive reaction over falling in line and he and bobby figured out a dynamic that worked but now he has to work under a captain who is Not His Dad, who not only isn't going to give him Special Baby Boy privileges he refuses to give buck even an inch of validation or praise like this IS bucks version of the torture nexus it's the anti-praise he cannot survive under constant negging it makes perfect sense that he started having a mental break and personally i love it when the show pushes and pushes right on bucks issues until he snaps, that's when he's at his most fun as an unhinged and imperfect character
3K notes
·
View notes