Text
can I come over and look at you like this
24K notes
·
View notes
Text
i think it's really fun that the most destructive legal action that can be enacted on someone else in the united states is just "extend parental rights to an adult"
6K notes
·
View notes
Text
My partner and I will refer to “purchasing photons” in reference to the fact that we both seem psychologically incapable of just going for a walk to get some daylight - we need a fetch quest to complete so we almost always end up spending money on something. Photons, we agree morosely, used to be free. Enshittification strikes again.
#lol#when I lived at main street and seaside level I could go on 'free' walks#now that I have to climb up and down hills to get to nice walk spots I require treats#I can sometimes go for a run for free though. how the tables have tabled.#think a run comes with quest accomplishment points. is the thing
111 notes
·
View notes
Text
I don't think it's that weird to want to believe that the thing you ended was nevertheless something significant and meaningful, whose ending might have an impact on each of your lives, and not something so quickly and readily replaced without even blinking
The oddest recurring beat in sit coms is someone very dramatically breaking up with their partner and then acting hurt and betrayed when they fall into Some sort of rebound relationship- and, specifically, the narrative portraying this as, like, a basically reasonable and justified reaction.
You're the one who ended things!
#additions#it might not be an optimal wish or whatever#but it's not terribly mysterious#it's not universally the case but at least for a significant number of people#it is actually true that if they move on from something very very easily that is because they never valued it very much to begin with#and even if you were the one ending it you might still have valued it much more than that
112 notes
·
View notes
Text
Everybody lives two lives at once. You have one life which is the stream of experience and sensation, and so on, the moving moment — immediate pleasure, pain, sadness, anger, comfort and convenience.
And the second life is an aesthetic object, a narrative, which is less bound to any single moment. It is experienced or observed as a whole. Even difficulties add to it, compound its structure and identity.
You can be happy with one life and not the other.
Some pains and inconveniences are sort of "pleasurable", because they're ego-syntonic, they validate the overall narrative of your life and your sense of being a developed person. On the one hand, it's inconvenient for me to be asked to pick up a relative from the airport, but it also recognizes me as an independent person of whom things can be asked, an adult possessed of adult things such as a car, and (most likely to be verbalized) it makes me feel useful. The inconvenience is a necessary component of those things.
I may groan and complain about it, but secretly I enjoy it in a way that doesn't necessarily enter my verbal stream of consciousness and which I might never acknowledge as an element in rational decision-making.
Yes, this is sort of trivial and obvious when you say it like that, but you see a lot of people confused about it in the wild, because it's not a prominent part of their self-awareness. The second life is always somewhat submerged.
I want to emphasize that this isn't just about trivial misfortunes, either, those are just the easiest to talk about.
This explains a number of things: why people pursue goals that are at once intensely personal (i.e., not dictated by the rational pursuit of superordinate political goals) and which do not entail anything conventionally associated with pleasure or happiness, like @max1461's tortured artist.
Importantly, people generally do not take notice of the second life, they think the first one is real and the second sort of notional. Pursuit of the first one is rational and clearheaded and the second sort of wooly, idealistic. When they're aware of it, they're sort of embarrassed about it. They think "this validates my ego" is a silly reason to do things, vain and narcissistic and immature, Romantic or eccentric at best. Even pointing out that someone's reasons are of the second sort rather than the first is enough to delegitimize them.
And some of our confusion over things like "getting what you want vs. being happy" is due to an insufficiently explicit understanding of this distinction.
#this is fascinating#some years ago I deemed the second life 'fake' just a made up story#for a while now though it has been very much primary to me#it's like a whole theme of this phase of my life#life and personhood#<- that's where I've been capturing the theme
186 notes
·
View notes
Text
People will literally be doing anything on ao3
6K notes
·
View notes
Text
guys. i really like you. it's nice to be on this dashboard together
16K notes
·
View notes
Text
Ok, so after looking into some of the research that robnost posted links to recently, I am now even more convinced that LLMs are quite smart, are capable of genuine reasoning, and have an elaborate and internally consistent world-model. Questions of consciousness aside, these are genuine artificial intelligences, thinking machines. And they're only gonna get smarter.
Uh, five years ago I would have said this was impossible in my lifetime. Maybe among people truly plugged in the awareness came earlier, but for me it was last year that my thinking really started to shift. And the general public hasn't caught up yet because obviously they haven't; people are still saying "these things are just glorified autocomplete". Well, to some degree they were, but while you weren't looking the autocomplete grew a mind. Which was always the scenario that worried people with AI, that some system would unexpectedly develop genuine intelligence. And I think we are like, there. It has happened. LLMs don't have agency, they don't have desire. They don't want anything in particular, and they certainly don't have the practical capacity to act in the world to achieve any goals they did have. But I mean, in the most core sense, I think we're there, I think we are actually there. For good or bad, we have actual artificial intelligence.
211 notes
·
View notes
Text
I took my little brother (autistic, mostly non verbal) out and he was using his voice keyboard to tell me something, and this little boy (maybe 4 or 5?) heard him and asked me "Is he a robot??" I tried to explain to him that no, he isn't a robot, he just communicates differently, but my darling brother was in the background max volume "I am robot I am robot I am robot I am robot"
101K notes
·
View notes
Note
What do you think the point of life is?
To find love (in which ever way you prefer)
To get old
To find what you love and do it
To grow (Physically? Emotionally? Another way?)
To explore
Something else/nuance
Dude. You’re getting a little existential here on apolladay.tumblr.com
#prev you are always kicking me tf out of my typical-minding#(appreciative)#I totally imagined a 'for you personally' into the question that is obviously not there#anyway something else but it's on a need-to-know basis.#what are you a cop?#poll
220 notes
·
View notes
Text
so I got soy protein
it's giving...flour
at a similar dilution ratio to whey shakes, I get porridge. it's also unbelievably fine powder and hates dissolving
I am 20% sure I could cook with just this as flour for like a flatbread or some shit
but hey it is actually non-creamy
are vegan protein powders (any in particular?) less uhh rich/creamy/etc (fatty?) than whey?
#m#food#it's pretty decent to drink on its own with enough patience for dissolving and mega massive dilution#but I can't really add non-negligible amounts to anything like a smoothie or whatever#because thickkkkk
17 notes
·
View notes
Text
still don't think the straight women want me though. which is fine probably
#m#maybe in some part because they assume I'm gay which is only a little bit incorrect#but also probably similar things to general straight guy struggles
2 notes
·
View notes