bigbird13131313

[bigbird13131313]

If you selected ''no'', listen to my pinned intro recording and DM me the exact phrase that I tell you to DM me in it. Your hypnosis virginity will be taken soon, little sub.

[bigbird13131313]

I’ve started enjoying this experiment, keeping my husband locked in chastity for my own personal amusement. He’s become so eager to please me now, and his cock has learned to respond so well when it’s unlocked. I pull him towards the bed, spreading my thighs apart as I tell him to press his face between them.

[bigbird13131313]

The more frustrating it gets, the stronger the desire to push it further.” Damn. That mindset. 🔥 #ChastityLife #KinkMindset #ChastityCage #CMC #MaleChastity #TeamLocked

[bigbird13131313]

I’m not even asking to fuck you! Just let me get hard, and rub my throbbing erection on your soft smooth legs!

[bigbird13131313]

[bigbird13131313]

12 things submissive men can learn from Butlers

[bigbird13131313]

Being permanently locked, what sorts of discomforts/ physical pains do you experience? I know at first a cage is annoying to wear, you get painful erections, leaking, stuff being pulled etc. I know if I try to not come for a long time my balls will start to give me discomfort. Did you experience all this? How has it changed trough time? Doesn't not coming for a year cause "blue balls"?

Also, being locked I'm sure it's not something you easily forget, but after 8 years I guess some part of the thing has become very normal. So I'm wondering, how often do you remember you are locked/ have such a special key? Could an entire day pass without you thinking about it or talking about it?

I started with various home built cages, which gave me an opportunity to figure out what worked and what did not. When the CB3000 hit the market, I was already in the line. I discovered the early hinged rings were pinching and chafing magnets, so I modified a CB3000 solid ring to fit. Eventually I made my own solid stainless steel ring.

I spent a couple of years making modifications to the CB3000, but arrived at a cage that was comfortable, convenient, and secure. I wore it for years.

By the time I got around to my current cage, a stainless steel A272, I knew what would work for me. I rarely am even aware that I am wearing a cage. Occasionally I need to shift it over the seam in my jeans. Or in cold New England winters, I may need a little adjustment to handle things. But that's pretty much the extent of it.

Look, if you wear a watch daily, eventually you become used to how it feels, and you only happen to think about it if it catches on your shirt or a pocket. It's pretty much the same thing.

The A272 is convenient enough so I can stand at a urinal, and it's easy to clean in the shower. I really don't have the kinds of thoughts about being caged the way that you're thinking about them.

[bigbird13131313]

Whispers and Secret Signals - The art of discreet dominance

[bigbird13131313]

Tips to make chastity life easier

When his skin is irritated, just fill his cage with thick lotion like Nivea. Make sure to put some lotion onder his foreskin. Now he can heal while locked.

If you really want his dick in you, use numbing cream. He will make you cum but he won’t feel a thing. After you came, just lock him back up!

Afraid that he might escape? Glue his foreskin to his dick with medical glue or super glue. It wil make sure he cant jerk off for at least a week.

Wash his cage in pure alcohol.

No need to take of the cage for cleaning. Pour some soap into the opening and blast some water in it. It will act like a dish washer.

Use some lotion or baby oil around the rings at night to prevent pulling and irritating.

Pull his dick in the cage using a piece of nylon stocking. That way you pull his foreskin to the front of the cage, being very comfortable.

The easiest way to put on a very small chastity device is in the shower. Use lots of soap while pulling his dick through the ring.

Swap the default lock into a numeric lock or a rubberized lock to avoid pinching. Unless you like the clicking noise when he moves.

No whining or talking about the cage is allowed. Otherwise you’ll only be hearing things involving sex.

Absolutely no complaining, bitching or whining will be permitted…. PERIOD.

When won’t enter his cage, use Ice

If you want to give him some out time use some numbing cream. He may play as much as he wants with his dick but he won’t feel a thing.

[bigbird13131313]

10 Foundations of a well trained husband

[bigbird13131313]

Kickstart your FLR: A guide for men trapped in a vanilla relationship

[bigbird13131313]

Tips to make chastity life easier

When his skin is irritated, just fill his cage with thick lotion like Nivea. Make sure to put some lotion onder his foreskin. Now he can heal while locked.

If you really want his dick in you, use numbing cream. He will make you cum but he won’t feel a thing. After you came, just lock him back up!

Afraid that he might escape? Glue his foreskin to his dick with medical glue or super glue. It wil make sure he cant jerk off for at least a week.

Wash his cage in pure alcohol.

No need to take of the cage for cleaning. Pour some soap into the opening and blast some water in it. It will act like a dish washer.

Use some lotion or baby oil around the rings at night to prevent pulling and irritating.

Pull his dick in the cage using a piece of nylon stocking. That way you pull his foreskin to the front of the cage, being very comfortable.

The easiest way to put on a very small chastity device is in the shower. Use lots of soap while pulling his dick through the ring.

Swap the default lock into a numeric lock or a rubberized lock to avoid pinching. Unless you like the clicking noise when he moves.

No whining or talking about the cage is allowed. Otherwise you’ll only be hearing things involving sex.

Absolutely no complaining, bitching or whining will be permitted…. PERIOD.

When won’t enter his cage, use Ice

If you want to give him some out time use some numbing cream. He may play as much as he wants with his dick but he won’t feel a thing.

[bigbird13131313]

District superintendent shares powerful letter against banning DEI from public schools

Read every word of this, no matter what you think you know about DEI.

Jacalyn Wetzel

04.17.25

Department of education; DEI; banning DEI; letter to Department of Education; ban DEI demand; ban DEI in schools

Superintendent pens emotional letter to Department of Education

It’s not often people witness public school officials publicly clashing with the Department of Education, but that’s exactly what has been happing. This face-off isn’t over school officials attempting to do something that might harm students. Some school officials feel that the steps recently taken by the Department of Education are harmful overall and one district superintendent penned a powerful letter.

Recently the Department of Education, now being headed by Linda McMahon sent out a mass memo to public schools across the United States giving them just 10 days to rid their schools of Diversity, Equity and Inclusion initiatives (DEI). Some states immediately while others pushed back on the directive. The consequence for schools not complying with the demand is the loss of federal funding, which could devastate some public schools who heavily rely on federal funding to fill in the gaps where state funding falls short.

In the instance of the school boards that refused to comply, most were very brief in their dissent, but for this district superintendent, they laid out exactly how ridding the schools of DEI would harm their students. The letter was shared by Clair Hochstetler on Facebook where it has been shared 154k times. Hochstetler did not pen the powerful letter, she shared it anonymously in an effort to protect the identity of the state superintendent who sent it off to the Department of Education.

The anonymously shared letter lays out all the ways diversity, equity and inclusion are used in schools evoking strong emotions from readers.

Read the letter in it’s entirety below:

“Still Not Signing: A Superintendent’s Response to the Department of Education’s Anti-DEI UltimatumThe federal government gave us ten days to sign away our values. Here’s our answer.

April 8, 2025

To Whom It May (Unfortunately) Concern at the U.S. Department of Education:

Thank you for your April 3 memorandum, which I read several times — not because it was legally persuasive, but because I kept checking to see if it was satire. Alas, it appears you are serious.

You’ve asked me, as superintendent of a public school district, to sign a “certification” declaring that we are not violating federal civil rights law — by, apparently, acknowledging that civil rights issues still exist. You cite Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, then proceed to argue that offering targeted support to historically marginalized students is somehow discriminatory.

That’s not just legally incoherent — it’s a philosophical Möbius strip of bad faith.

Let me see if I understand your logic:

If we acknowledge racial disparities, that’s racism.If we help English learners catch up, that’s favoritism.If we give a disabled child a reading aide, we’re denying someone else the chance to struggle equally.

And if we train teachers to understand bias, we’re indoctrinating them — but if we train them to ignore it, we’re “restoring neutrality”? How convenient that your sudden concern for “equal treatment” seems to apply only when it’s used to silence conversations about race, identity, or inequality.

Let’s talk about our English learners. Would you like us to stop offering translation services during parent-teacher conferences? Should we cancel bilingual support staff to avoid the appearance of “special treatment”? Or would you prefer we just teach all content in English and hope for the best, since acknowledging linguistic barriers now counts as discrimination?

And while we’re at it — what’s your official stance on IEPs? Because last I checked, individualized education plans intentionally give students with disabilities extra support. Should we start removing accommodations to avoid offending the able-bodied majority? Maybe cancel occupational therapy altogether so no one feels left out?

If a student with a learning disability receives extended time on a test, should we now give everyone extended time, even if they don’t need it? Just to keep the playing field sufficiently flat and unthinking?

Your letter paints equity as a threat. But equity is not the threat. It’s the antidote to decades of failure. Equity is what ensures all students have a fair shot. Equity is what makes it possible for a child with a speech impediment to present at the science fair. It’s what helps the nonverbal kindergartner use an AAC device. It’s what gets the newcomer from Ukraine the ESL support she needs without being left behind.

And let’s not skip past the most insulting part of your directive — the ten-day deadline. A national directive sent to thousands of districts with the subtlety of a ransom note, demanding signatures within a week and a half or else you’ll cut funding that supports… wait for it… low-income students, disabled students, and English learners.

Brilliant. Just brilliant. A moral victory for bullies and bureaucrats everywhere.

So no, we will not be signing your “certification.”

We are not interested in joining your theater of compliance.

We are not interested in gutting equity programs that serve actual children in exchange for your political approval.

We are not interested in abandoning our legal, ethical, and educational responsibilities to satisfy your fear of facts.

We are interested in teaching the truth.

We are interested in honoring our students’ identities.

We are interested in building a school system where no child is invisible, and no teacher is punished for caring too much.

And yes — we are prepared to fight this. In the courts. In the press. In the community. In Congress, if need be. Because this district will not be remembered as the one that folded under pressure.

We will be remembered as the one that stood its ground — not for politics, but for kids.

Sincerely,

District Superintendent

Still Teaching. Still Caring. Still Not Signing.”

The letter ignited emotion and praise from readers in the comments with one person writing, “As a retired teacher, I applaud you and thank you. We need to do everything we can in our schools to help every child. Getting rid of DEI makes it impossible for many, many children to live life at its fullest.”

Another says, “YESS! Now if they ALL have the guts to do this then maybe we’ll get somewhere.”

Someone shares their disbelief, “Every single school district nationwide needs to copy and send this exact response! It’s brilliant!I am still not convinced that we are not living in the twilight zone or the outer limits,” they write in part.

“Hear Hear!!! More schools need to Resist & fight this!!!” someone else chimes in.

[bigbird13131313]

Never forget Republican cowardice.

[bigbird13131313]

[bigbird13131313]

What do you both think would change the most of you reverted to a more traditional sex life? Less closeness? Change in the power dynamics in bed?

I had to really think about this, but I realized that this is just another version of the questions we get like "How would you feel if your husband no longer wanted to remain locked?"

I think questions like that come from a place where readers think that we're still playing a long term game. Maybe we were a long time ago, but keeping my husband locked has gone way beyond just a game. Our entire marital relationship has changed because of this. My husband is totally devoted to my pleasure, and this extends outside the bedroom. He does little things around the house that I often don't need to even ask. He never leaves the room without asking if I need something. He cares for me in a way that I can't describe, never complaining.

Last year he told me that he has figured out that what he feels for me is not just love, but devotion. I can't think of any better way to describe it.

And for me, I have learned that being in control of his sexual pleasure is very hot, but it goes beyond that. It gives me confidence in our relationship. I know that he will always desire me. We're in our mid 60s now, and he still acts like he did when we first started going out. But more... the idea that he agreed to my control is something I can't even describe. I feel powerful when I make him have an orgasm... but also when I deny him. For a while I was letting him come once a month. Now I haven't allowed him in over a year. To have that kind of power over someone who loves you is intense and addictive.

I know this is not what you're asking, but the question really can't be answered. Keeping him locked has become such a basic part of our relationship for so long that there's no way I can even think about "reverting" to anything else.

[bigbird13131313]

I love seeing my loving bondage toy on his knees, begging for me to grant him the ultimate pleasure of cumming or even just releasing him from chastity. His eyes are filled with desire as he looks up at me, pleading for me to show him some mercy.

“Please, mistress,” he begs, “just let me cum. I’ve been locked in this cage for so long, I can feel it building up inside of me.”

I smile and walk over to him, running my fingers through his hair as I lean down to whisper in his ear. “You’ll get your chance soon enough, my dear,” I say, “but first, you need to be tied up properly.”

I lead him over to a chair and tie his wrists and ankles securely, making sure he’s nice and comfortable before leaving him there for a few hours. He can’t move or escape, all he can do is wait patiently for me to return.

Finally, I come back into the room and unlock his chastity device, letting it fall away from his body as he gasps in relief. “Thank you, mistress,” he says, looking up at me with gratitude in his eyes.

But my mercy doesn’t last long, as I quickly lock him back up again, leaving him to wait once more for his next release. He’s mine to do with as I please, and I love every minute of it.