capitandisaster

[capitandisaster]

my mum just answered a spam phone call with "catholic horse cemetery how can I help you"

[capitandisaster]

Spamming art as an apology bc I forgot I had a tumblr account again

But here have some more TMA Elias art! This one’s kinda old but I’m still a fan of it

Evil British man🫵

[capitandisaster]

I made it

[capitandisaster]

[capitandisaster]

It just, it just turns right. It doesn’t make any sense. No, it wasn’t a spiral because you couldn’t, you could also go forward. I mean I, I did mostly just… forward and the paths never got shorter, like you were coming to a centre, they just kept going. It doesn’t, it doesn’t make any sense.

Some closeups because DAMN did I put a lot of work into drawing all that by hand. You get a little prize if you finish the maze I've drawn😇😇😇

[capitandisaster]

Grim Reaper Part 1

Grim Reaper Part 2

It's the Hound Knight again, AT LAST!

Check out my Patreon for the 2 bonus panels.

My stuff :

✧Read Namesake✧ ✧Read Crow Time✧ ✧Store✧ ✧Patreon✧

[capitandisaster]

Gerry's eye tattoos not being burnt off is something I think of often.

[capitandisaster]

I know 'the children' is a scapegoat used by these puritanical nutjobs trying to censor the internet of all the 'icky' stuff they don't like/want people to have the freedom to have access to but lets pretend it was about 'the children.'

I could solve that in one sentence:

"Your kids are not my responsibility, you need to parent them yourself."

But since its not ACTUALLY about 'the children' feel free to tell the censor-happy fascists to fuck right on off anyway.

[capitandisaster]

GUYS GUYS I FINISHED IT!!!

[tma version part 1]

[tmp version]

[all versions in one post]

[capitandisaster]

Unmute !

[capitandisaster]

You're not lost! You're just on a journey :)

[capitandisaster]

[capitandisaster]

sardines creature

[capitandisaster]

distortion be upon ye

[capitandisaster]

According to Know Your Meme, on August 18th, 2005, Erwin Beekveld brought forth this work into the world. HAPPY TEN YEAR ANNIVERSARY, THEY’RE TAKING THE HOBBITS TO ISENGARD.

[capitandisaster]

man "ship and let ship" kinda stops working when ppl are actively shipping minor and adult characters together like hello?? same with the "dont like dont read" mentality, some shit shouldn't be fetishised maybe??

You've got a lot going on in this ask, anon, and it's obviously not asked in good faith. If I were a smarter human being, I'd delete it and move on with my life, but it's 9am on a Saturday morning and I'm still on my first cup of coffee so I'm just dumb enough to take the bait and respond.

Ship and let ship doesn't mean you need to approve of what other people are shipping. It doesn't mean you need to like what other people are shipping. It means that what other people ship is their business and what I ship is my business.

If I don't like a ship, I don't read it. I don't search out the tag. I don't try to find creators for it. I don't watch youtube compilations or stare at gifs or read meta analysis about how the ship is supported by canon.

If I don't like a ship, I just... don't think about it. It really is that easy. And when I do think about it, I might be annoyed for a moment, but then I move on with my life because guess what? Shipping is a meaningless hobby that I engage in during my free time and I don't want to waste my free time feeling pissed off.

I've seen a lot of bizarre definitions of "minor/adult" shipping, but even if we use the definition of an adult sexually abusing a child, it's still very easy for me not to read that story on AO3. I'm assuming this is all about AO3? It always seems to be in this kind of ask.

AO3 requires people to use one of two warnings in those cases. Either Underage or Creator Chose Not to Use Archive Warnings - or both. I use the filter system to remove works with those warnings from my search results and guess what? Those works might as well not exist for me because I've never seen one. And I've been on AO3 since about 2013.

The thing about these kinds of opinions is that they only ever come up in relation to shipping. I never see these opinions related to violence or drugs or swearing or whatever else you might find morally repugnant. But the handy thing about "don't like, don't read" is that it applies across the board.

I don't think I'm going to like the new Jurassic Park movie, so I'm not going to go to a movie theatre, spend $15, and sit in a dark room with strangers for two hours to watch it. I'm not going to read reviews of it. I'm not going to watch the trailer. If a friend of mine invites me to go see it, I'll pass. I won't stop my friend from going to see it, though. If they're going to enjoy it then they should - and they're not going to fetishize dinosaurs or paleontologists or the tourism industry when they do.

If you're not able to control your own reading habits, then you should probably be more careful on the internet. Use Net Nanny or other content filtering tools to make sure that you can avoid the content that you're unable to resist through willpower alone. But don't make your inability to stay away from things you don't like my problem. That's all on you.

[capitandisaster]