cherrytea556

[cherrytea556]

Meh whatever

[cherrytea556]

be kinder to each other this pride month. remember that while we must remember why we need to stay vigilant and protect ourselves from queerphobia, and to remind people of the violence and hatred has happened in our past, we also have to show support for one another, and be kind and accepting, even if we don't understand each other. there is never a time to hate on your queer siblings, but especially not during pride month. this is the time where we are meant to band together the most, and share happiness, joy and understanding alongside remembering the hurt we've experienced.

get over yourself and stop the trans infighting. trans men and women are never enemies, especially not during pride month. drop your hatred for queer people you don't like or understand, like nonbinary people, intersex people, """tmes""", afab queer people, queer cis women and men, straight trans people, male lesbians and female gays, bi and pan lesbians and gays, he/him lesbians and she/her gays, bi and pan people in general, aros and aces, genderfluid and bigender people, and anyone else you feel animosity toward. there is never a time for that, but especially not now.

expressing and experiencing pride together is what makes us strong, and helps us understand one another, and that the barriers between us do not exist like we think they do. band together. experience pride together. it's not just for you- it's for every queer person, and that deserves to be celebrated together. if you don't like that, you're missing the entire point of pride and you need to reflect on this before you even attempt to celebrate this month. pride isn't for you and you alone, it's for everyone, and that includes the queers you don't like and don't accept. they're queer, they're here, and they're not going anywhere. accept it.

[cherrytea556]

I usually don't make posts like this, but; Hello I won't be interacting with genderqueerdykes anymore, after being informed of it raping its ex girlfriend.

I generally take asks sending me internet callout posts with a grain of salt because most are bullshit and spread with bigoted intentions.. but.. this is a real one. As a survivor of violent SA its an understatement to say I'm disgusted by hearing about this.

[cherrytea556]

Hey, I believe you about genderqueerdykes, but do you have further information about the rape thing? Like maybe screenshots or some firsthand accounts? I thought that blogger felt... kind of off to me. Like in terms of opinions and stuff. But I could never quite place why.

theres a first hand account from its ex gf detailing the abuse she faced

im inclined to believe her because faking this quantity of screenshots over this period of time is almost unimaginable, and as soon as people really started spreading this around gqd went on full lockdown mode. it disabled comments, turned off asks, turned off messages... ...and addressed nothing.

it was more sorry after the transmisogynistic rant it went on than this!!! even if it was far from enough, it at least Apologized and Acknowledged it. youd think if a bunch of people were accusing you of rape and the screenshots were fake youd say ANYTHING about it. just a simple "i didnt rape her," but its radio silence, because it knows its completely Fucked if this spreads any more. nobody will donate to it anymore and its primary source of income will be gone.

it hasnt said anything and is actively suppressing this from being shown to people by the sheer level of moderation it has on its profile now. it basically only self reblogs its own donation posts and self pitying tirades in an attempt to garner enough sympathy to keep making passive income from its followers who genuinely care about it. its intentionally taking advantage of people and hiding evidence. its an active danger and an embarrassment to dykefags and nonbinary people everywhere lmfao

[cherrytea556]

non lesbians always in lesbians' business, we should be allowed to kill people

[cherrytea556]

Equinox also tried to claim in its recent transmisogynistic rant that transfems make false accusations because of toxic masculinity. https://www.tumblr.com/coremilk/774757128066957312

"i've noticed a lot of transfems have this issue, and it's from internalized toxic masculinity. they've been taught that men raise their voices, and women stay quiet. they benefit from this still, s they keep doing it. i've also seen a lot of transfems default to throwing things or hitting people, screaming at someone unrelated, insulting people, literally making up lies and accusing people of things they haven't done, misgendering people, and so on"

Link to post - op did a wonderful job breaking down just how horrible it is but I'd like to share my thoughts too.

Jesus christ this is worse than I thought it'd be. I don't even think this is "softened" TERF rhetoric, it's straight mask-off transmisogynistic bigotry. The more I read through those screenshots the more aggravated I was getting. This is the same ethos as 'gender critical feminism'.

It even tried to use its intersex upbringing to justify using the radfem version of gender socialization theory, which personally pisses me off as someone who did experience inconsistent gender socialization due to being intersex. Gendered socialization as a sociology concept isn't akin to brainwashing like TERFs, radfems, and this fucker, seem to believe. The act of questioning your gender and out as trans in and of itself breaks the internalized roles you were previously subconsciously enforcing on yourself by believing you are cisgender. For people like me, those roles were never consistently enforced and reified by the world around me, meaning I never internalized them and truly had a false-cisgender or genuine cisgender self-conceptualization. I was looking at cisnormative gender from an outsider's perspective from a very young age. This means my gender journey varies greatly from most people who experienced CSIG (consistent societally imposed gender). THAT is the difference between CSIG & ISIG, not whatever the hell radfem bullshit this person is on about.

You can't really get more transmisogynistic than referring to transfeminine hurt and anger as "toxic masculinity" and literally blaming their "stubbornness" on having a penis?? The FUCK. A body part will never make someone behave in a certain way. Blaming a trans woman's "bullheaded" behavior on having a penis is no different from a transandrophobe blaming a trans man's "hysteria" on having a vulva. My penis isn't making me stubborn, aggressive, "bullheaded", or whatever else. It's actually very difficult to make me legitimately angry.

This is a really upsetting post that lays out a disturbingly TERFish set of beliefs regarding trans women. Legitimately. I would recommend blocking @genderqueerdykes, especially if you are transfem or adjacent.

[cherrytea556]

if you exhibit terf or transmisogynistic rhetoric, or platform those who do, i do not like you either. as far as im concerned genderqueerdykes needs to either leave the internet and undo all of the radfem conditioning its done to itself or it needs to die in a pit. saying "oh im sorry" is no excuse for openly racefaking and pretending to be black for hundreds of dollars or going on a 1k+ word rant about trans women being male socialized.

that is years worth of internalized transphobia and it actively appropriated racism for its own gain. that will not be undone with a "sorry." that is "leave the internet and come back in 6 months" level bad. i dont know why the transandrophobia community isnt making more of a fuss about this considering it allegedly raped someone as well. im a transandro "bro" but i am just as furious about the treatment of trans women on this site, and if you continue to platform a racefaker and a potential rapist i do not like nor trust you on my page.

the paradox of tolerance states that if we continue to tolerate the intolerant they will ransack our community into a bigoted mess. get transmisogynistic transandrophobia theorists out of this space and never put that fucker on my dash again. quit sending it asks, quit sending it donations, quit listening to its whining. im sick of this community trying to ignore this or going "oh now people are going to hate transandrobros even more!!!" seriously??? you care about your image right now?????? it raped someone (allegedly). what the fuck is wrong with you. there are bigger issues, here!!! and if it didnt commit rape it is still currently a horrible person. its donation posts are still up, and it has still not addressed the rape allegations. quit shoving this under the rug.

[cherrytea556]

Pretend you didn't see that.

This is a level of transmisogyny that is somewhat hard to comment on because the things that one would normally point out as transmisogynistic implications are said so brazenly that there can be no pretense about any of the involved parties being unaware of it. The authors know, the readers know, everybody understands that this is pure transmisogyny. There is no plausible deniability.

It's an attempt to establish proximity between transfems and cis manhood in every way possible. Their bodies, their histories, their "socialization", the way they are treated by others, the way they treat and view others, their ways of thinking, even their self-conception. Every aspect of their being is cast as essentially male. Transfems are being called "men" in all but name - and not just any "men", they are made into embodiments of the worst aspects of hegemonic manhood. Not just male socialized but continuing to benefit from male socialization. Not just engaging in abusive behaviors stemming from male socialization but being afforded the freedom to do so because they continue to be treated as men. (Suffice it to say that this does not align with reality)

This is unadulterated sex-essentialism and it's intentionally being used to delegitimize and devalue the standpoint of transfems in feminist discourses. It's clear that the author is projecting transmisogynist ideas onto transfems and simply assumes that these ideas must be correct without considering any alternative. (The fact that transfems do not internalize "male socialization" has been reiterated many times over and should not have to be continually reasserted. This is a baseline level of understanding that we should be able to expect and demand from members of our community.)

Misogyny is framed as being contained within the realms of sexed bodies and gendered socialization in such a way that it allows for the casting of transfems as people enacting misogyny without being primary targets themselves - like cis men.

The claim that the animosity some transfems exhibit towards men comes from wanting to "prove" their womanhood serves the double purpose of casting their womanhood as inauthentic and denying the misogyny they suffer at the hands of men. One would be hard pressed to find a more cruel mischaracterization of transfems' experiences than this.

The cynical misappropriation of the standpoint of the people this screed is directed at by the use of "we" despite making it abundantly clear that the behavior that is being criticized and its supposed causes exempt people such as the author from the possibility of engaging in it should also be noted as an attempt at weaponizing a compromised version of standpoint epistemology against transfems.

The only plausible target audience for this kind of rhetoric are those who carry extreme ressentiment towards transfems and are susceptible to softened formulations of TERF ideology. These are the same kinds of ideas that TERFs have tried to push into trans spaces numerous times, e.g. under names like "sex-conscious feminsim".

A formulaic "retreat" from this post consisting entirely of platitudes has been published after the author received backlash for it but nobody is under any obligation to accept it and they absolutely should not. A person who was very obviously attempting to promote TERF ideology in trans spaces and in the same stroke accused transfems of being uniquely prone to making false accusations is not trustworthy, even if that person backs down upon realizing that the reception is more uniformly negative than anticipated.

@genderqueerdykes @gateway-2000 is a transmisogynist, beyond a shadow of a doubt. Its entire worldview is permeated by transmisogynistic assumptions, ideas and biases at a fundamental level. It has straightforwardly expressed an understanding of transfems' interiorities, their experiences and their social positions that is so incorrect that one has to wonder how someone holding these views could have navigated trans communities for a considerable amount of time without encountering the many transfeminist rebuttals to all of its demagoguery. How could someone with even a passing level of familiarity with TERF ideology or "gender critical feminism" read and espouse these ideas without recognizing them? It's completely unthinkable. It's not unreasonable to assume that it simply misjudged the consensus within its audience as being sufficiently anti-transfeminist for ideas such as these to fall upon fertile ground and it is now going back to waiting until the time is ripe to reintroduce them and to expressing them in more subtle ways until then.

But you can't un-ring a bell.

We can and should assert boundaries against reactionaries engaging in obvious subversion such as this. Refusing to do so is a deleterious error in judgement. This is very far beyond the limits of what any trans community that wants to consider transfems a part of itself can be allowed to tolerate.

[cherrytea556]

Ideas are cooking for my pride outfit.

[cherrytea556]

when you look up a bunch of references because the leg you drew looks wrong, but legs just look like that

[cherrytea556]

In retrospect of her new video which was basically just 4 hours of nonsensical yapping about how the HH/HB critical community are a bunch of misogynistic pigs (despite most of the community's biggest issue with the series being it's mistreatment of it's female characters): even when I was watching Sai's videos about people like Lily "Orchard" it never really seemed like she cared about making actual criticism or giving a voice to Lily's victims. Her only real points always amounted to- "You're cringe! And gross!" with no real reflection or nuance. She's also one of those people who thinks they're "too cool" to be offended by silly things like the R-slur.

Oh she also is this person:

Saying this while being a SU fan is so irony lmao

WHAT.

So much for that moral high ground.

(TLDR: Sai Scribbles is cringe AF ((and racist?))

[cherrytea556]

Lil nothing rant (if I had a nickel for the amount of yapping this year, I’d have 4 or 5, sue me):

Ngl, I still think Saberspark is weird for defending Black Gryphon. I know it’s hard to really do anything when even BG’s wife says she wasn’t groomed, but the ‘friendship’ between a 13 and 23 year old to publicly dating when she’s 20 is really sus as 💩.

“You can’t charge him if the victim doesn’t want that.” No shit, I’m saying we can’t be defending that crap he did. What does that communicate to people?

I’ll tell you: it tells them that they can get away with it so long as the victim is successfully in their corner.

“You can’t expect their friends to potentially blow up their friendship and reputation!” I’m not expecting that. I expect the bare minimum of not going out of your way to minimize or defend concerning behaviors.

It was not normal that BG was alone in the woods with 2 minors.

Again, we can’t do shit, but I’m getting kinda sick of the defense behind Bg rizzing up a minor subtly. Still skeptical? Here’s a vid that ISN’T made by Ilovekimpossible

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=4KiLVtV8TAs&t=18s

Anyways, don’t mind me, just an observer 🤷

[cherrytea556]

Just going to say it right now, I watched Saberspark's response video, and I don't believe him. But there's something else I want to touch on:

People in the comments were saying the video was made as well as Kwite's response and they they hope he can come back from it like he did, but that couldn't be further from the truth. In Kwite's video, which was over an hour and a half compared to Saberspark's under 20 minutes, he went through each allegation and debunked them with conclusive proof, often exposing his own insecurities to do so. In Saberspark's video, all he says in relation to the allegations is that he didn't do it (obviously, no one would admit to that). The rest of his video was spent ranting about "online vigilantism" and attacking the people who made the video about the allegations. Mind you, they did a horrible job on the video, but a poorly made video doesn't mean the events didn't occur. When there is evidence of you being at the places people say you assaulted them and you have publicly (and continuously) defended a groomer, you don't get to be let off the hook without evidence.

[cherrytea556]

What sucks about KP (Ilovekimpossiblealot) is the fact that since she allegedly lied about Saber Spark, that means some of the ACTUAL stuff that Saber had did (example: 'allegedly' Harassing the grooming victim's father for voicing his concerns about his daughter marrying her groomer) get buried under the sand.

As well as the gryph0n drama too because now a lot of people are gonna assume that it's all a hoax despite the evidence that is shown and it doesn't help that Saber in his video subtly defended Gryph0n as well as the creator of Billie bust up (they defended Gryph0n). It really pisses me off as a victim of grooming myself, do better

[cherrytea556]

So, ya'll want my gut feeling about BlackGryph0n explained?

Okay.

Back in the 2014-2015 days, I followed some antiSJW brony folks and these three artists made satirical blogs abt the adult CMC mocking tumblr culture and fandom. Not a big fan of those same artists now, but the one who owned the Applebloom blog made a parody comic of that time Gabriel posted pics of dripping syrup and tying up Michelle Creber (who was still a minor at the time), by having Gabe's griffonsona do that to Applebloom while a disapproving Apple family look on. The comic ended with the other Apple's sending Gabe's oc to be eaten by Queen Chrysalis. The comic then linked to and showed the screengrabs of Gabe and Michelle Creber's real life posts that inspired it. It then had a poem parody that went like: "sing a song of sixpence but surely they deny, one big black gryphon backed into a pie, deported by the apple fam for hitting on a tween, wasn't that a dainty dish to set before the queen?"

If ANY of this comic still exists it would be under a wayback machine of "ask apl-pleb-loom" or something like that. The mod of that blog posted besides "Fury Belle" (radfeminist SJW Sweetie Belle) and Ass Brutalewd (Stootalo but a horndog college girl).

I don't so much care for the artist and distanced myself from them and the antisjw types. I don't support or like them but THAT was how I first learned and saw what Black Gryph0n was doing. Back in the mid 2010s. I didn't learn after the fact, I was aware of the accusations for a lone time. When the Hazbin Hotel pilot came out, I didn't know how to feel when I learned who Alastor's va was. To be clear, I don't think anyone at Spindlehorse knew of that situation since most people didn't and knew Gabe more from his old Brony days. I'm not blaming Spindehorse, especially since they recast Gabe anyway. Again, while I never cared for the person I originally heard that info from-

the image of 17-y-old something Michelle with duct tape on her mouth, posted to an audience of impressionable children and fellow gooning bronies, with Gabe smiling, proudly, like it was nothing has ALWAYS stuck with me. I haven't excessively combed through the all the documents and evidence to see if someone else has found that image, but to me, that was enough to swear off Black Gryph0n and his work. I KNOW that that happened. I KNOW that that incident occurred and Gabe did that.

Having found out years later that he married Claire IS uncomfortable. Marrying someone for the adult they are now as an adult even if you did know them briefly as a minor is one thing; I think even the healthiest relationship that's questionable. I'm not convinced, considering the rumors going around and that someone was bold enough to make an entire parody comic about it, that NOTHING inappropriate happened when Claire and Michelle were teenagers. At the very least, what Gabriel posted and thought was 'cute' back then with both girls was beyond inappropriate.

Like MandoPony (remember him?) it was a betrayal within Bronydom that hit hard. There was no shortage of creepy bronies and assholes in the fandom, like our dearest Lily Orchard and ToonKritic, but BlackGryph0n was 'horse famous' and seen as mostly child-friendly. He was trusted enough to hang out with the teenager members of the actual show.

I will not hear that BlackGryph0n isn't a creep and didn't in some way take advantage of anyone. "Grooming"/"not Grooming" who cares about the specifics: he was an adult and should have known better than to ever post something like that.

I don't know the extent of EVERYTHING ILoveKimPossibleALot did/said of Saberspark in relation to any of this. Knowing KP, I can def believe she did a bad job at a call out. That's KP. Barring the video she did explaining why she left Lorch, she's really not good at handling drama. I don't feel inclined to hear her take away on Gabe, Saber, Sai or anyone.

If you support Gabriel Brown and insist on stanning Saberspark because he supports Gabriel Brown, please kindly unfollow me.

If you unironically think "YES Gabe/Saber got metooed' NOW I CAN HATE THEM!" is any kind of sane reaction, ALSO please kindly unfollow me.

[cherrytea556]

To any of Sai stans who finds this post, please do not interact. I like having brain cells and I do not wanna waste them on arguing with you.

Sai Scribbles is now defending Gabe aka BlackGryphon because of fucking course she is. 🙄

This is the context. Keep in mind that Gabe was in his 20s talking to a 14 year old girl like this.

Has someone who was on DeviantArt back in the day at age 9, adults calling kids "babe" was not the norm at all. Meeting a child who met online as a grown ass man is not normal either.

Sai is checking all the boxes on how to be a horrible nasty person!

Racist ☑️ Transphobic ☑️ Ableist ☑️ Now groomer defender! ☑️

[cherrytea556]

I feel like lily/cd call now has this strange ripple effect where the people that criticised her or called her out also turn out to be awful or at least morally dubious people. I wont name names, this is not supposed to be a call out post, this is just expressing personal feelings. Im specifically talking about two content creators who were critical of lily in mind. One of them made a lot of videos on lily in 2024-25 while the other only made a few back in again, 2024-25. They are kind of polar opposites in terms of presentation - one is unapologetically blunt and not so pc to put it lightly (e.g calling lily the r slur) and their criticisms are in forms of livestreams while the other presents more professionally with videos (one of them was a livestream cut but still it counts) but what they have in common is that - both make valid points on lily. Their criticism of her in general is solid. That is why I watched and used to be subscribed to their channels. And they also are online associates, appearing in each others livestreams, one doing thumbnail art for the other. If your in the lily critical space, you will know exactly who I'm talking about.

So when the incident occured when one of them used racial slurs, not just the n word thats censored in a poor way, but also said the uncensored slurs against chinese and pakistani people (which unlike the r slur, isnt even their place to say) it really turned me off. I disagreed with them on some things before but the racist language used irresponsibly really didn't sit right with me but what really ticked me off was their defence for blackgryphon acting predatory to minors on deviantart, with it being that devianart families and that kind of interaction was common back in those times. Which is not only a bullshit defence on its own but also goes against their morals they displayed online as they believed online families like lio convoys were suspicious, yet they still used it to defend what is clearly a child predator. Idc how long ago was it or even the marriage, talking like that to minors is predatory and should be called out as such. Its disgusting how they defend child predation. Yet they had the gall to call courtney a hypocrite for also being predatory to kids even though they still dismisses blackgryphon's predatory behaviour to kids. It turned me off from them and their content completely.

For the other, it was because I found out (and it was just by clicking who they credit for one of their critical videos on lily) that they paid someone who openly does incest rottmnt art that sexualises the teenage cast. Suffice to say, I was disappointed.

I just wanna get this out of my chest without stirring attention from those two creators so please do not harass them and ping them with this. It feels disappointing to see the current critics of an awful person also not being great people themselves. And although I experienced this before, this feels even more exhausting because I used to actually liked them and enjoyed their content. A shame really. Also I wanna express it here cuz people are expressing their own criticism of those people in that stupid impersonation account by anons. If you want to express criticism safely, dont do it to a troll account that made a sexual "joke" about one of their actual wife please. You can express frustrating in the comments here or just write it out in a google doc or diary. That would be more healthier and your not giving a creepy troll attention just o hate on someone else.