call me coffee | she/her | twenty-something w/ a fully formed pre-frontal cortex | yo i'm a whore for trees
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
Photo
Newly released alternative take of the Han/Leia kiss scene STAR WARS: THE EMPIRE STRIKES BACK
19K notes
·
View notes
Text
One thing I really love about Russian Doll is that they eliminated any “will they won’t they” tension (because it’s not the point of the show) by just having Nadia and Alan get drunk and fuck nasty a few episodes in. Then, proceed with the plot. These characters were never destined for romance and I love their friendship so so much.
149 notes
·
View notes
Text
Russian Doll (2019- ) Reflection (S01E06)
1K notes
·
View notes
Text
ughh i miss riverdale it should’ve had 20 seasons or more. it was cut down in its prime. they should’ve gotten to kill off jughead at least 6 more times. cheryl should’ve gotten to become president of space or something really really awesome like that. they could have retconned the supernatural elements and then reinstated them two seasons later to keep things fresh. they could’ve let archie be a beautiful lesbian for a while. they could’ve had gay kevin still being gay and kevin. the possibilities…
643 notes
·
View notes
Text
"i asked chatgpt" well i calculated the number of the beast. it is napoleon. six hundred three score and six. and i will kill him one day. he's no great man, none of us are great men, we're caught in the waves of history. nothing matters; everything matters, it's all the same. Oh, if only I could not see it, that dreadful, terrible, it.
1K notes
·
View notes
Text
i was gonna say that riverdale didn't properly get spn-level popular because all of the interesting couples are f/f and occasionally f/m and the m/m get nothing but like. they DID try. every season they keep throwing a toxic yaoi situation at gay kevin and he keeps going "no no im here to side with cops and direct musicals." meanwhile toni and cheryl are buying each other gangs as presents and faking cannibal accusations and letting the ghosts of their ancestors (also gay) possess them.
339 notes
·
View notes
Text
I 100% believe that Nathan Fielder made a deliberate choice in focusing the episode around footage of him interacting with two autism "advocates" who are ultimately ableist and reductive in their understanding of autism. A congressman who doesn't even know what masking is, and an advocacy organization founder who uses outdated tests and won't acknowledge that not-autistic folks might benefit from rehearsing difficult social situations? That's not an accident.
If you look up Doreen Granpeesheh, you'll see that she is known for promoting the idea of autism "recovery," and that she has a history of publicly supporting the claim that there's a link between vaccines and autism. Her Wikipedia page makes very clear that she is a problematic figure whose work has been critiqued, and that she should not be taken seriously. Fielder, along with his writers and producers, would have known her reputation when booking her for the show.
A screenshot from Granpeesheh's website. Yes, it would appear she is actually proud of this headline.
And I think he's using the meeting with Cohen as a commentary on how autistic folks (and minoritized people in general, most likely) are treated by people in authority. Instead of masking and politely leaving the room, instead of picking up signals that Cohen is wrapping up the meeting without wanting to announce he's doing it on camera, Fielder purposely doesn't "take the hint" so that Cohen has to flounder and keep trying to wrap up the meeting in a way that is ultimately vague, dismissive, and rude. The longer the audience has to sit and watch that dynamic play out, the more likely we are to recognize Cohen as the bad guy in the situation rather than Fielder. It's brilliant.
And it's the exact same strategy he's using by spending the first half of the season ostensibly focusing on the first officer in those cockpit interactions, while deliberately giving screen time to guys like the "banned from every dating app" pilot to make it clear who is actually the source of the problem (and to hopefully trigger an FAA sexual harassment investigation in that one instance). In all three of these situations, he's showing us how a problematic person in power holds all the cards and is unwilling to budge.
I know there are differing opinions on what aspects of the show and his character are exaggerated or performed. As a very self-aware autistic comedy writer, this is my assessment: I think he's semi-deliberately not filling silences with masking behaviors, and asking questions he probably knows are uncomfortably direct, to create a space where others (often the neurotypical folks in these situations) have no choice to fill in the silence, which ultimately makes them say or do something relevant. I think he also acts like an unaware, unbiased observer in situations where he has a strong idea of what's going on. So whenever he says "I didn't know why" or "I didn't understand," he probably mostly does know and understand, but he knows that performing the role of an unbiased observer is a stronger strategic choice to get his message across.
He's basically playing the role of a journalist who knows that two of the most effective tools in his toolkit are a) silence when he wants a subject to reveal crucial information, and b) an "unbiased" narrative frame that makes the audience feel as if they're coming to a conclusion on their own, rather than being told what to think.
It's a nuanced approach but I think it's a smart one, especially considering that autistic-coded folks are very easily dismissed when speaking truth to power. And yeah, he's not gonna get his Congressional hearing. But pointing a camera at the problem and airing it for a massive audience, while saying "Me? I don't have an agenda; this data just presented itself in response to my neutral, unbiased question" is a pretty autistic—and often effective—approach to problem-solving.
343 notes
·
View notes
Text
the dots are being connected do you see the dots connecting?




4K notes
·
View notes
Text
One guard lies. One guard tells the truth. One guard thinks he's telling the truth but operates from deeply unsound epistemological principles that were inculcated by his elders to steer him to specific predefined conclusions, he's not lying but nothing he says is as actionable as he thinks it is. One guard is honest but he's got that thing where he keeps confusing your left and right with his left and right, and even when it's just him he's always got to stop and think for a second to remember which is which, and long story short he's never once said the correct door on the first try. One guard says whatever the first guard to speak says because he's afraid of being left out. One guard claims the opposite of whoever was first to speak because he's a contrarian. One guard does that fuckass postmodern "what is truth" song and dance because he doesn't actually know which door is the correct one, he lost the briefing packet and for obvious reasons he can't pick a door to check in person. Defeats the whole point if you can come back
2K notes
·
View notes
Text
MESSENGER: As I did stand my watch upon the hill, I look'd toward Birnam, and anon, methought, the wood began to move.
MACBETH (played here by a cartoon new yawk mobster): Cheese it, it's the copse!
2K notes
·
View notes
Text
Reblog daily for health and prosperity
270K notes
·
View notes