commissarraege - Tumblr blog

[commissarraege]

Congress has set out a bill to stop the FCC taking away our internet. PLEASE SPREAD THIS AS MUCH AS YOU CAN.

https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/4585

[commissarraege]

A business owned city sounds like a libertarians wet dream

Thneedville

[commissarraege]

The FCC voted to repeal Net Neutrality, but I would like to reiterate to all of you that now is not the time to panic. It’s time to get angry and active, but not time to panic.

Clickbait sites are painting today as the definitive “end” of it all, but it’s not. This shit’s still got to go through the courts.

The FCC has tried to repeal net neutrality twice before, and both times it got repealed by the courts.

The voting public’s support for Net Neutrality is overwhelming. Last I checked, 83% of polled voters nationwide are in support of Net Neutrality staying.

Republican politicians and lawmakers are aware of this overwhelming support and have been voicing their support as well.

Doug Jones victory in Alabama was a wake-up call for Republican politicians, letting them know they are not invincible. 

Join the millions of Americans making their voices heard. Contact your representatives. Call them. Email them. Tweet at them. Anything you can do helps. Use the links provided on this website:

https://www.battleforthenet.com/

This is not a time for panic, it is a time for anger and for action. Let them know that this is not the end, only the beginning. 

[commissarraege]

If the FBI Approaches You to Become an Informant: An FAQ: What You Need to Know

Federal agents approach you. Perhaps they just ask a couple offhand questions; perhaps they have a deal to propose. They might tell you they are trying to help you; they might tell you that you are in a lot of trouble and it will just get worse unless you cooperate with them; they might tell you that they need your help to prevent something terrible from happening. But whatever they say, you can’t be sure what their real agenda is or what they’re trying to learn. Whether you’ve already been approached for interrogation or you simply want to be prepared for the possibility, this FAQ answers all the questions you might have. Don’t take our word for it—follow up with other legal scholars for more perspective.

The FBI went to great lengths to target Martin Luther King, Jr., the Black Panthers, and countless other activists and social movements through COINTELPRO and other programs like it. Just like the KGB or the East German Stasi, their operations depend on a population that is willing to inform on each other out of cowardice and self-interest. The “War on Drugs” and the “War on Terror” have both relied on informants to fill US prisons with millions of inmates. Under Donald Trump, we see police and FBI agents ramping up their activities to intimidate and entrap more people than ever, with the explicit purpose of suppressing dissent. We have to stand up to these bullies.

Am I obligated to cooperate with police?

No, you don’t have to answer any questions or supply names to the authorities. Neither you nor anyone else has a legal obligation to assist the police in solving a crime. You are not legally required to cooperate.

If I do inform, will they protect my identity?

Though the state often refers to informants as “confidential informants” or “confidential human sources,” prosecutors may be obligated to disclose your identity in court, especially if you were central in the issuance of a warrant or if you were present at the scene of whatever the defendant is accused of. The defense could also force you to testify in open court: they are guaranteed the right to do so under the confrontation clause in the Constitution. Generally speaking, the FBI and prosecutors only concern themselves with protecting the identity of informants as long as they have additional plans to utilize them.

If I don’t inform, can they make me testify in court?

If you lead a prosecutor or a law enforcement officer to believe that you have relevant information, you could be subpoenaed to testify. Your best chance at avoiding this is to refuse to talk to them from the beginning. That way, if they come after you later, other people will have good reason to trust you and support you in continuing to resist the pressures of the state. Your strongest and most secure right is the right to remain silent from the very beginning.

If they are threatening to arrest me in order to get me to inform, don’t they have to give me access to a lawyer?

While this might depend on the jurisdiction, the answer is generally no. You have a right to an attorney if you are being arrested, but law enforcement guidelines give officers wide discretion to make offers to get someone to inform. They may never formally arrest you, just detain you and question you.

Is the FBI obligated to give me what they offer when they are trying to get me to inform?

This is a grey area. Federal agents may offer formal informants a written agreement that is supposedly enforceable like a contract—but the FBI is obviously the more powerful party in this negotiation, with little to lose from failing to follow through. Law enforcement officers often maintain a network of unregistered informants whose testimony is not used in court but rather provide tips and useful information to aid in investigations. Many informants think they will get off for snitching, only to learn later that they still face time for lesser or reduced charges.

In short: the FBI cares about repressing communities and disrupting social movements, not about protecting informants.

Can’t I just feed them false information to keep them off my back?

18 U.S.C. §1000 makes it a federal crime to knowingly mislead or lie to federal officials, including law enforcement. Federal agents have used this law to prosecute those they suspect of “domestic terrorism” when they have no other evidence to go on.

Remember, if law enforcement is looking for informants, there is a good chance they don’t have a case against whoever they’re trying to target. Don’t give them a case against you.

Couldn’t I just give them worthless or meaningless information?

It’s always better to remain silent and not cooperate when approached by the FBI, then speak to a lawyer as soon as possible. Information you might assume to be irrelevant could be of interest in an entirely different case; it could implicate people you did not intend, or give the Feds a reason to really harass you. If you give them information about anyone, however harmless you think that information is, you increase the likelihood that they will attempt to intimidate and interrogate that person and likely others—and that they will come back to keep trying to learn more from you.

Don’t make the mistake of thinking you can control the situation by talking. You can’t know what the actual goal of their inquiry is, or what their strategy is in approaching you. The only control you have is in refusing to speak to them.

Don’t FBI agents need to have something on me before they can approach me?

FBI agents can run with what is called an “assessment.” It doesn’t require a warrant or approval from superiors, and it can be just as invasive as a full-fledged investigation. According to their guidelines, this assessment can be used to “seek information to identify potential human sources [i.e., informants], assess the suitability, credibility, or value of individuals as human sources, validate human sources, or maintain the cover or credibility of human sources, who may be able to provide or obtain information relating to criminal activities in violation of federal law, threats to the national security, or matters of foreign intelligence interest.”

In other words, they are free to approach you and say whatever they like without any information whatsoever.

What are the chances they are going to approach me? How many informants are there, and how important are they to the activities of the FBI?

Law enforcement is dependent on informants. The FBI alone maintains a network of some 15,000 informants just for their counterterrorism program. Since September 11, 2001, nearly every major terrorism-related prosecution has involved a sting operation with a government informant at the center; there have been at least 416 defendants in terrorism prosecutions involving an informant.

While it is impossible to determine what the chances are that any particular individual will be approached to become an informant, it’s reasonable to assume that federal agents will approach members of our communities whenever they see an opportunity to collect information or disrupt our organizing.

What if they have already talked to me and I agreed to help them because I was scared?

You are not obligated to cooperate. You can invoke your right to remain silent at any time. If you have already spoken with law enforcement, seek an attorney immediately.

You also need to be honest with everyone in your life about the conversation you had with them. If you fall into one of the traps that the FBI is so good at setting, you should be completely honest and transparent about it and recount the encounter in full. This is the only way to deserve the trust of your companions, be accountable for your actions, and make it possible to obtain support from others if you need it.

Even if you do not divulge any information whatsoever, you should report any interactions with federal agents to your community at large. You don’t need to keep it a secret that you are being targeted—the ones targeting you already know. Bringing FBI activity to the attention of the general public can discourage federal agents from harassing people. It also enables people to organize together and support each other.

What should I do if I am approached to become an informant?

Remember these four things:

-Non-cooperation is the best way to protect our communities and movements against state repression.

-If they are approaching you about informing, they probably have a weak case if they have a case at all.

-You do not have to cooperate. You have the right to remain silent.

-Contact an attorney as soon as possible.

Further Resources on Repression and Resistance

If an Agent Knocks

You Have the Right to Remain Silent

Tilted Scales Legal Collective

Grand Jury Resistance Project

What Is Security Culture?

Is S/He an Informant? A Ten Point Checklist

Bounty Hunters and Child Predators: Inside the FBI Entrapment Strategy

Towards a Collective Security Culture

I shall die, but that is all that I shall do for Death; I am not on his payroll.

I will not tell him the whereabouts of my friends nor of my enemies either. Though he promise me much, I will not map him the route to any man’s door. Am I a spy in the land of the living, that I should deliver men to Death? Brother, the password and the plans of our city are safe with me; never through me Shall you be overcome.

-Edna St. Vincent Millay, “Conscientious Objector”

[commissarraege]

[WATCH] Palestine TV female reporter is being harassed on air by Israeli occupation terrorists in Aboud, West Bank

[commissarraege]

#NetNeutrality

There is literally no chance of us civilians being able to overpower giant telecommunications megacorporations and their lobbyists from killing net neutrality

dont wanna sound like some fucking nihilist but democracy is dead, whoever has the most money always wins, folks need to go out and destroy the rich in able to achieve anything

[commissarraege]

Imagine that you’re twenty years old. You were born in 1996. You were five years old on 9/11. For as long as you can remember, the United States has been at war.

When you are twelve, in 2008, the global economy collapses. After years of bluster and bravado from President George W. Bush — who encouragedconsumerism as a response to terror — it seems your country was weaker than you thought.

In America, the bottom falls out fast. The adults who take care of you struggle to take care of themselves. Perhaps your parent loses a job. Perhaps your family loses its home.

In 2009, politicians claim the recession is over, but your hardship is not. Wages are stagnant or falling. The costs of health care, child care, and tuition continue to rise exponentially. Full-time jobs turn into contract positions while benefits are slashed. Middle-class jobs are replaced with low-paying service work. The expectations of American life your parents had when you were born — that a “long boom” will bring about unparalleled prosperity — crumble away.

Baby boomers tell you there is a way out: a college education has always been the key to a good job. But that doesn’t seem to happen anymore. The college graduates you know are drowning in student debt, working for minimum wage, or toiling in unpaid internships. Prestigious jobs are increasinglyclustered in cities where rent has tripled or quadrupled in a decade’s time. You cannot afford to move, and you cannot afford to stay. Outside these cities, newly abandoned malls join long abandoned factories. You inhabit a landscape of ruin. There is nothing left for you.

Every now and then, people revolt. When you are fifteen, Occupy Wall Street captivates the nation’s attention, drawing attention to corporate greed and lost opportunity. Within a year, the movement fades, and its members do things like set up “boutique activist consultancies.” When you are seventeen, the Fight for 15 workers movement manages to make higher minimum wage a mainstream proposition, but the solutions politicians pose are incremental. No one seems to grasp the urgency of the crisis. Even President Barack Obama, a liberal Democrat — the type of politician who’s supposed to understand poverty — declares that the economy has recovered.

[commissarraege]

They been wanting his head for years.

All someone gotta do is go get it. It gets more and more appealing every day.

“Surrender Donald” – Gay activists rally outside Trump Tower in New York, protesting the city’s tax breaks for luxury real estate developers while thousands of people with AIDS sleep in the streets. Oct. 31, 1989

via reddit

[commissarraege]

Learned something new.

this is the angriest bird i’ve ever seen

[commissarraege]

from your blog its clear that you are a communist of some form, which is cool, but it kinda looks like you either support stalin or stalinist policies? at the very least, you really romanticise the ussr, even from the 20s to the early 50s when stalin was in power. yet, you clearly have a sense of empathy, of compassion for other humans, else you wouldn't post so much about the holocaust. it doesnt make sense to me, when you look at purges, the holodomor, etc. are you a stalinist?

no i’m not a stalinist lol and i also wouldn’t say i romanticize the soviet union i just talk about the achievements that are less often mentioned than the crimes. i also don’t like the term holodomor, the term is a deliberate attempt to emulate the holo prefix of holocaust and draw a parallel between the two or, even worse, depict the holocaust as retribution for the famine

[commissarraege]

There are two kinds of EDC; purposeful and tiny peepus. This unfortunately reeks of the latter.

Going through Sebastian Gorkas “EDC” list I have several critiques;

One- The Glock 29, while smaller than the 20 and meant for conceal carry, is still the potent 10mm round. And in such a small package, the recoil is going to be atrocious. The government officials that were issued the 10mm cartridge used a severely watered down version to make it more manageable.

The S&W is much more applicable for proper street use.

Two- The 6p light is a dated piece of equipment, and for the price you could get something much more applicable for proper use.

Three- If you have an EDC process, you carry more than a tourniquet. As an instructor, it is good to have if someone shoots off their kneecap or something, but generally if you carry one for yourself for funsies without some sort of tearaway basic pouch, your doing it to say “Yeah, I seen some stuff babe, that’s why I’m prepared.”

Four- The foldy blade versus straight blade argument depends on how you carry and how you have trained. Generally a straight blade is much more reliable and sturdy, but the foldy blade is easier to conceal. If you get yourself close enough for a knife fight, your already effed.

Five- Pocket Constitution… Pretty peepus-ey for a native Torrie who (hopefully, probably) gained citizenship via marraige and gets to keep it so long as he stays married.

[commissarraege]

This is why communists can't get along with other communists.

#internalcommitteepurges

[commissarraege]

How are people so stupid they implicitly and unquestioningly believe Communist propaganda? For instance, you believe the Cuban regime when they laughably said they eliminated child hunger. Why did you believe such a patently ridiculous claim? Bonus points if you don't use the word "capitalism".

it’s your supposition that I believe communist propaganda unquestioningly and that the reason people believe it is stupidity rather than experience. when I first became a communist I was much less trusting of socialist state media and even arguments made by communists that seemed overly optimistic to the point (I thought) of being naive. I had to be proven wrong many times to change my outlook.

its sad to me that “eliminating child hunger” is a patently ridiculous claim in your eyes. you apparently live in a world where you can’t imagine anyone doing that.

the claim you’re referencing is that Cuba has eliminated severe childhood malnutrition. here is UNICEF (hardly a bastion of communist thought) giving you the evidence on that one: http://www.unicef.org/publications/files/Progress_for_Children_-_No._4.pdf which also shows Cuba has beaten the US at lowering the under five mortality rate

[commissarraege]

Is "vote with your wallet" only valid for people with money to spend then? I mean, we should try and spend on things we want to see more of if possible, right?

It’s not invalid for anyone, obviously if people keep buying something it will create a demand. The only problem with that rhetoric is that it implies everyone has an equal amount of power in the market, and that boycotts will cure any harmful business practices. The reality is large corporations who cause the most harm own tons of brands and even buy/merge with other companies so you can’t just boycott monopolies. Also, corporations attempt to cover their harmful practices and often people don’t even know about them until they’re uncovered, like the Volkswagen scandal. Overall “vote with your wallet” is a very inaccurate and simplistic idea under capitalism.

[commissarraege]

Liberals are the protostate of the alt-right;

They value "personal liberties" over the censorship that needs to happen. Liberals don't go full-tilt Nazi in one go, generally.

They closely relate to the conservative right, and they use a lot of the same buzzwords, so there is more of a connection than to anything on the left. The minute AntiFa start smashing faces, as they should, the Alt-Right then say "They are refusing our God-given rights to freedom of speech, press, etc, whatever." Which then gets the liberals to sympathise with them.

This is how the Nazis began their censorship campaigns. Actions happened, they went "Help help! I'm being oppressed!" Which in turn allowed them to drop the hammer and begin censoring freedoms themselves, under the guise of protecting the freedoms they claimed were under attack. The "They made me do this. We wouldn't have had to do this if they would have just played by the rules."

Which then devolves into a totalitarian state where they hold all the power.

The Liberal is not your friend. The Liberal is a Nazi sympathizer and must be punched as well if they cannot be educated to the errors of their ways.

“I oppose fascists, but I also oppose antifa” to me might as well just read “I claim to oppose fascists, but I also oppose the only thing that can meaningfully stop them from recruiting and organizing for genocide.” People seriously don’t get that the tactic of swaying the public through debate doesn’t work against fascists. Fascists don’t need majority approval or support to do horrible things, they just need to feel like there aren’t any significant social repercussions for it. If they don’t face backlash when they spread their propaganda and declare their intention to commit ethnic cleansing, that’s when they’ll know that they’ll be able to get away with actually doing what they intend to do.

And don’t delude yourself into thinking that you can convince fascists to change their mind with reason, because their arguments aren’t meant to adhere to reason or truth. Instead, they’re performative statements with two purposes: the first is to state what would need to be true to justify their existing intentions, and the second is to signal themselves to other members of their in-group so they can more easily join together to form a coherent political force.

This is why, when dealing with fascists, the only effective tactic is to raise the social cost of being fascist, so that they’re afraid to spread fascist propaganda openly. Sometimes this means violence, other times it just means denying them a platform to spread their ideas and recruit other fascists.

Because of this, when liberals defend the “free speech” of fascists, this effectively gives fascists a space to signal their intentions to other fascists, allowing them to group together and organize. Allow fascists to organize, and they’ll commit acts of terror against the most vulnerable populations.

You don’t even necessarily have to like it when antifa resort to black bloc tactics, but if you oppose antifa in general, you’re a stooge. The way you oppose fascists is by shutting them the fuck down, and if you’re against that, you’re doing nothing but aiding the enemy.

[commissarraege]

“The game tells you that you have to choose between the Empire and the Stormcloaks. Neoliberalism or white colonialist ethnostate.

Fuck you, Stormcloaks, for somehow finding a way to make a fucking empire that bans religions and celebrates the rich and kills indigenous peoples look good in comparison.

Those are your choices. Empire or Nazis.

Wait, or are they?

It’s an open world game. You can do whatever you want.

In case I’ve mired my already obnoxiously obvious metaphor, what I’m saying is: we live in an open world game. We can do whatever we want. We don’t have to give in to the scripted dynamic we’ve been presented with.

Mostly, what I want to do is pick flowers and make healing potions, but I suppose instead I’ll see if I can ride a dragon into battle against all these fascist scum.”

[commissarraege]

In a lecture given at the University of Pennsylvania, American poet Patricia Lockwood described dril as a literary alter ego of Twitter users and the Internet in general. Comparing the account’s persona to Ignatius J. Reilly, the protagonist of John Kennedy Toole’s novel A Confederacy of Dunces (1980), Lockwood cited dril as an example of new possibilities in first-person narrative that could be explored online. Lockwood said of dril:

“He is a master of tone, he is a master of character; his accidents are not accidents and his spelling mistakes are not mistakes. His character is the anonymous psycho of the comments box. He has been banned from every forum. He is all-present and nothing-knowing. He is the corn syrupaddiction of America and he is an expired Applebee’s coupon. We worship him in a big, nude church while the police blast Kenny Loggins and wait for us to come out. We will never come out. We like Kenny Loggins.”[4]

Commenters have frequently, if sometimes facetiously, compared dril’s persona to Donald Trump (and vice versa), particularly Trump’s voice on Twitter and other social media—to the extent that it has become a cliche to compare the two.[8] “Both,” according to Purdom, “are aging, endlessly aggrieved white men who seemingly do not understand core components of the internet, yet they perfectly embody its anonymous rage, its ability to turn people into lunatics being swarmed and eaten alive by enemies and trolls.”[8] In 2017, Lockwood tweeted “in a world where dril is president … and everyone surrounding him is also dril …”;[27] later, writer Parker Molloy questioned whether Trump was the anonymous writer behind dril.[28] A 2016 article at New York magazine even argued that Trump should choose dril as his vice-presidential running mate (a position eventually filled by politician Mike Pence) because the writer perceived commonalities, even prescience, within dril’s style of “incoherent, libidinous, authoritarian comment-spam” and Trump’s own style of campaign tweeting.[29]