conciliarist-blog

[conciliarist-blog]

more, more sources

C:\Users\owner\Documents\reading_image7.png

[conciliarist-blog]

[conciliarist-blog]

More sources

Birkerts, S. (2010). Reading in a Digital Age: Notes on why the novel and the Internet are opposites, and why the latter both undermines the former and makes it more necessary. The American Scholar, (2), 32.

[conciliarist-blog]

Booksquare Link

[conciliarist-blog]

Bibliographic references to pursue

Adler, A., A. Gujar, B. Harrison, K. O’Hara, and A. J. Sellen. 1998. A diary study of work-related reading: design implication for digital reading devices. In Proceedings of CHI’98 Conference, 241-248. Los Angeles, CA. Downloaded from jipm.irandoc.ac.ir at 22:17 IRST on Sunday February 26th 2017 مينگ ليو. رضا رجبعليبگلو. رفتار مطالعه در محيط ديجيتال ... ١٠٧ 2. Almind, T. C. and P. Ingwersen. 1997. Informetric analyses on the world wide web: methodological approaches to webometrics. Journal of Documentation 53(4): 404-26. 3. Berkenkotter, C. and T. N. Huckin. 1993. Rethinking genre from a sociocognitive Perspective. Written Communication 10(4): 475-509. 4. Birkerts, S. 1994. The Gutenberg Elegies: The Fate of Reading in an Electronic Age. Faber and Faber, Boston, MA. 5. Bolter, J. D. 1991. Writing Spaces: The Computer, Hypertext, and the History of Writing. Hillsdale, NJ.: Laurence Erlbaum Associates. 6. Darnton, R. 1989. Towards a history of reading. Wilson Quarterly 13(4):87- 102. 7. Eveland, W. P. and S. Dunwoody. 2001. User control and structural isomorphism or disorientation and cognitive load? Learning from the web versus print. Communication Research 28(1): 48-78. 8. Goldsborough, R. 2000. Text demands respect on the web. Advertising Age 71(32): 44. 9. Gordon, M. D. 1997. It’s 10 a.m. Do you know where your documents are? The nature and scope of information retrieval problem in business. Information Processing & Management 33(1): 107-21. 10. Griffiths, J. and D. W. King. 1993. Special libraries: increasing the information edge. Washington, DC: Special libraries association. 11. Hart, P. E. and Z. Liu. 2003. Trust in the preservation of digital information. Communications of the ACM 46(6): 93-7. 12. Hartzell, G. 2002. Paper lion. School Library Journal 48(9): 37. 13. Healy, J.M. 1990. Endangered Minds: Why Our Children Don’t Think. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster. 14. Knulst, W. P., G. Kraaykamp, G., van den Broek, A. and de Haan, J. (1996), Reading habits: 50 years of research on reading and threats to reading: cultural foundations. www.scp.nl/boeken/studies/studie23/uk/samenvatting.htm (accessed August 1, 2004). 15. Landow, G. P. 1992. Hypertext: The Convergence of Technology and Contemporary Critical Theory. Baltimore, MD.: Johns Hopkins University Press. 16. Lanham, R. A. 1993. The Electronic Word: Technology, Democracy, and the Arts. Chicago, IL.: University of Chicago Press. 17. Lanham, R. A. 1995. Digital literacy. Scientific American 273(3): 198-200. 18. Levy, D. M. 1997. I read the news today, oh boy: reading and attention in digital Libraries. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM International Conference on Digital Libraries, 202-11. Philadelphia, PA. 19. Liu, Z. 2003. Trends in transforming scholarly communication and their implications. Information Processing & Management 39(6): 889-98. 20. Liu, Z. 2006. Print vs. electronic resources: a study of user perceptions, preferences and use. Information Processing and Management 42(2): 583-92. Downloaded from jipm.irandoc.ac.ir at 22:17 IRST on Sunday February 26th 2017 ١٠٨ علوم فناوري اطلاعات. دوره ٢٢ .بهار ۱۳۸۶ 21. Liu, Z. and D. Stork. 2000. Is paperless really more? Rethinking the role of paper in the digital age. Communications of the ACM 43(11): 94-7. 22. McKnight, C. 1997. Electronic journals: what do users think of them? Proceedings of the International Symposium on Research, Development and Practice in Digital Libraries. Tsukuba: University of library and information science. 23. Manguel, A. 1996. A History of Reading. New York, NY: Viking. 24. Marshall, C. C. 1997. Annotation: from paper books to the digital library. Proceedings of the 2nd ACM International Conference on Digital Libraries, 131-40. Philadelphia, PA. 25. Miall, D. S. and T. Dobson. 2001. Reading hypertext and the experience of literature. Journal of Digital Information 2(1). http://jodi.ecs.soton.ac.uk/Articles/v02/i01/ (accessed August 1, 2004) 26. Michie, D. 1996. Scan, annotate and pass on... . New Scientist 149(2013): 48- 9. 27. Murray, J. H. 1997. Hamlet on the Holodeck: The Future of Narrative in Cyberspace. Boston, MA: MIT Press. 28. Murphy, P. K., J. F. Long, T. A. Holleran, and E. Esterly. 2003. Persuasion online or on paper: a new take on an old issue. Learning and Instruction 13: 511-32. 29. Nunberg, G. 1994. The places of books in the age of electronic production. In Future Libraries, ed. R. H. Bloch and C. Hesse, 13. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 30. O’Hara, K. and A. Sellen. 1997. A comparison of reading paper and on-line documents. In Proceedings of CHI’97 Conference, 335-42. Atlanta, GA. 31. Olsen, J. 1994. Electronic Journal Literature: Implications for Scholars. London: Mecklermedia. 32. Poynter Institute. 2000. Eye-tracking study conducted by the Poynter Institute and Stanford University. www.poynter.org/eyetrack2000/Changes in reading behavior 711 (accessed August 1, 2004). 33. Radway, J. 1994. Beyond Mary Bailey and old maid librarians: reimagining readers and rethinking reading. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science 35(4): 275-96. 34. Ramirez, E. 2003. The impact of the internet on the reading practices of a university community: the case of UNAM. In Proceedings of the 69th IFLA General Conference and Council. www.ifla.org/IV/ifla69/papers/019eRamirez.pdf (accessed August 1, 2004). 35. Ross, C. S. 2003. Reading in a digital age. www.camls.org/ce/ross.pdf (accessed August 1, 2004). 36. Sellen, A. and R. Harper. 1997. Paper as an analytic resource for the design of new technologies. In Proceedings of CHI’97 Conference. Atlanta, GA, www.rxrc.xerox.com/publis/com-trs/html/epc-1997-102.htm (accessed August 1, 2004). Downloaded from jipm.irandoc.ac.ir at 22:17 IRST on Sunday February 26th 2017 مينگ ليو. رضا رجبعليبگلو. رفتار مطالعه در محيط ديجيتال ... ١٠٩ 37. Sellen, A. and R. Harper. 2002. The Myth of the Paperless Office. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 38. Stoll, C. 1995. Silicon Snake Oil: Second Thoughts on the Information Highway. New York, NY.: Doubleday. 39. Strassmann, P. A. 1985. Information Payoff. New York, NY: The Free Press. 40. Topping, K. J. 1997. Electronic literacy in school and home: a look into the Future. Newark, DE.: International Reading Association, www.readingonline.org/international/future/ (accessed August 1, 2004).

[conciliarist-blog]

Journal of Documentation

 Reading behavior in the digital environment: Changes in reading behavior over the past ten years

 Ziming Liu

[conciliarist-blog]

[conciliarist-blog]

[conciliarist-blog]

[conciliarist-blog]

[conciliarist-blog]

[conciliarist-blog]

You don’t have to burn books to destroy a culture. Just get people to stop reading them

Ray Bradbury

[conciliarist-blog]

MLA Citations: Tech & Libraries

Top 10 List: MLA citations

Ash, Katie. “Classroom-Tested Tech Tools Used to Boost Literacy.” Education Week:. N.p., 4 Feb. 2001. Web. 17 Mar. 2013

Balajthy E. Technology and current Reading/Literacy assessment strategies. The Reading Teacher. 2007;61(3):240-247. http://moe.highline.edu:2190/docview/203281441?accountid=1327.

Burnett,C., Dickinson, P., Myers, J., & Merchant, G. (2006) Digital connections: transforming literacy in the primary school. Cambridge Journal of Education, 36(1), 11-29.

Guernsey, Lisa. “Are Ebooks Any Good?” School Library Journal (2011): n. pag. Print. Journal ArticleTagsEditDelete

Holum, Ann, and Jan Gahala. “Index of /sdrs/areas/issues/content/cntareas/reading.” Index of /sdrs/areas/issues/content/cntareas/reading. N.p., Oct. 2001. Web. 17 Mar. 2013.

Hughes, Marlena. “History of Technology and Reading.” YouTube. You Tube, n.d. Web. 17 Mar. 2013.

Prater, Carla. “Technology and Electronic Resources.” Personal interview. 12 Mar. 2013.

Ruedel, Mistrett, and Pacuilla. “Technology Based Approaches.” N.p., n.d. Web. 17 Mar. 2013. .

Scheeren,Bill. “21st Century Technology Challenges for the School Librarian.” School Library Monthly (2012): 36-38.

Swartz, Carl, A. J. Stenner, Sean Hanlon, Hal Burdick, and Donald Burdick, Ld. “Using Technology to Enhance Literacy Through Deliberate Practice.” N.p., n.d. Web