Text
FUTURE POSTING
I've had this account for years , but I've always been too afraid to post my art and stories. I'm hoping to change that sometime this year. I've been working on character profile pics to my stories and cover art to various parts of my stories. While plotting them out. I'm hoping to post those this year. I plan om working on two proof of concept comics for one of my major series after that. I do all traditional and I'm poor so I don't know how long it'll take.
0 notes
Text
Spider-Gwen fan art
Spider-Gwen is my favorite Marvel character from the comics , and I never drew her so i wanted to change that.

12 notes
·
View notes
Text
Bae is the good ending, actually
I would argue that not only is Bae the good and moral ending, Bay is the evil, immoral and - dare I say - selfish ending.
Let’s start by stating the obvious - the ending choice of Season 1 is a form of trolley problem.
A trolley problem is a type of thought experiment which presents you with a moral problem. The basic parameters are as follows: You find yourself near railroad tracks. There is a main track and a side track. There is a trolley coming down the main track. There are people both on the main track and on the side track. The people standing on the track the trolley is travelling down are in mortal danger. You can’t stop the trolley, or remove people from the track. The only thing you can do is to pull the lever and direct the trolley to the side track, thereby sparing people on the main track, but killing those on the side track.
Obviously, in the scenario we are analysing, the trolley is the approaching storm, the town of Arcadia Bay and all its denizens are located on the main track, Chloe finds herself on the side track and Max can pull the lever to divert the deadly danger from Arcadia Bay towards Chloe by using the photograph to erase the events of the week.
Since the last choice of Season 1 is a trolley problem, I think the moral solution is the same as with all other trolley problems – do nothing and let things happen. Let me explain.
Often, when presented with a trolley problem, people instinctively adopt a utilitarian approach. Utilitarianism is an ethical system which favours actions that decrease the amount of suffering in the world.
If there are two people on the main track and only one person on the side track, the utilitarian solution would be to pull the lever, because two deaths would cause more suffering in the world than one.
If there’s a young person on the main track and an old person on the side track, the utilitarian solution would be to pull the lever, because the young person hasn’t had the chance to live out their life to the fullest yet, so their death would cause more suffering.
If there is a person with a big family on the main track and a lonely person on the side track, the utilitarian solution is once again to pull the lever, because the death of someone who would be missed by many would cause more suffering than the death of someone who wouldn’t be missed by anyone.
I imagine that most people would be instinctively willing to agree with the first solution. Saving two people instead of one person? That makes sense. But I think (or at least hope) that most people would disagree with the next two examples, of the old person and of the lonely person. Who are we to judge who is more “worthy” of life and whose death would cause more suffering? But realize this - when you consider the quantity of lives at stake, your thought process is exactly the same as when you consider their quality.
If you choose to pull the lever in a trolley problem, you have usurped for yourself the right to judge who is more worthy of life. You have usurped for yourself the right to kill the people on the side track. Even if it’s an entire town on the main track and only one person on the side track. When you pull the lever and direct the trolley to the side track, you kill that one person. The fact that you saved the people on the main track doesn't erase that. Ends do not justify the means.
From my point of view, the moral answer to any trolley problem is to do nothing, because no matter how insignificant the life of the person on the side track may seem, nobody has the right to judge them unworthy of life.
A purely utilitarian approach to a trolley problem fails to take into account the substantive difference between letting things happen and actively causing someone’s death.
The final choice is made not on Monday, but on Friday. On Friday, Chloe is no longer in danger. Max can redirect the mortal danger from the town to Chloe, but it requires her action. On Friday, the "natural" course of events which doesn't require any input from Max is for the storm to level the town. If you sacrifice Chloe on Friday, you're killing her. You're pushing her back onto the barrel of Nathan's gun. But if Max sacrifices the town, she's only letting things that have been in motion since Monday proceed. She lets them proceed, because to stop the storm, she would have to kill someone. Max simply refuses to pay such a high price.
Having established the sheer immorality of sacrificing someone "for the greater good", let's move on to the selfish part. If Max sacrifices Chloe, that means she values her guilty conscience more than Chloe's life. That she doesn't want to live with guilt more than she wants to live with Chloe. Notice that when the storm comes, Chloe says it all happens for a reason and it couldn't be any other way. Only when she sees how distraught Max is, she does a 180 and offers her sacrifice. Her offer is mainly motivated by the desire to save Max from her guilt. The selfish thing would be to accept Chloe's sacrifice.
162 notes
·
View notes
Text
Chloe Price and Max Caulfield in Life Is Strange (2015)
33 notes
·
View notes
Text
7 years has gone so fast.

We're still fighting to foresee obstacles.
Becoming who we are.

41 notes
·
View notes
Video
youtube
I am going to shamelessly endorse my roommate’s wonderful video on Bridget Guilty Gear and the recent controversies surrounding her. Please give it a watch, as it’s a really fun dive into the character, and why people who try and act like she isn’t trans are fucking dumb. Enjoy!
41 notes
·
View notes
Text
11K notes
·
View notes
Photo
“MONSTERVERSE” PARALLELS Godzilla (2014) - Godzilla: King of the Monsters (2019) - Godzilla vs. Kong (2021)
3K notes
·
View notes
Photo

Bisexual men exist. Don’t forget about us this #BiWeek.
8K notes
·
View notes
Note
theres a couple of old panels that id like to know where they are from: one was of Jason getting a piggybackride on Bruce, and there was anotehr where Bruce was hugging him and thinking and its true that sometimes a son is not always born of his father or osmethign like that
piggyride: Batman #385
son: Detective Comics #533
759 notes
·
View notes
Text
Forgive Me
Forgive me for not fighting for you enough during those 14 years. I’m sorry I was not there to stop them from casting you aside like tarnished, broken jewelry. I regret not shouting your name louder and letting Square Enix know how important you are to me, to us, to this community. Is this my punishment for my silence? Was my dedication not enough? I am now left with this empty, lifeless character which is naught but a stranger to me – there is no warmth, no feelings – just vacancy. Was my admiration not enough to keep you from being plucked from my tightened grip, or was it not tight enough and you fell from my clutched fist. I pray that I might catch you before you fall into the forgotten abyss and I pray that I find the convincing rhetoric to keep you from all of this. No matter the outcome waiting at the end - just know I gave it my all and to that I will defend.
22 notes
·
View notes
Text
tumblr
Alright. We are working hard on twitter to reinstate our beloved voice actors. Join our cause- we have quite the following. George wants to come back and Crispin Freeman said to keep vouching for them and that is what we will do. Get on twitter and put #ReturnFinalFantasy7VoiceActors and #GeorgeNewbernforSephiroth2020 in your posts and we will find you!
I have edited this video with George’s voice to show how powerful it is. We need him back! We are not crazy and we won’t shut up.
29 notes
·
View notes
Text
This reminds me of what happened with the FFVII cast for FFVIIR







bit of a spat on twitter today. be respectful and calm down about the fantasy cast stuff. these lovely people put 5 years of hard work into a movie, don’t go yapping about who you’d like to replace them with. be kind to one another and respect the craft.
610 notes
·
View notes
Text



We have Reno and Rude’s support!!
Quinton and Crispin:
This Reunion is for you!
14 notes
·
View notes