ed-envs3000-w25

[ed-envs3000-w25]

Hi! Your post seems very well thought, and very well written.

In particular, I really liked your idea that interpretation is about building relationships between people and the environment, and not simply the relaying of facts. Interpretation is so transformative! Not only is it an educational practice, but rather it is also a way to create inclusivity, passion, and connection with nature. I also in particular liked your way of framing interpretation as a tool for building a sense of place. We all deserve to feel like we belong. This world is meant for everyone; sometimes we just have to see what it is in front of us, rather than digging deeper for some meaning. All in all, I feel like your reflection is a great reminder that interpretation is about connecting with the natural world, more than just knowledge! Great work!

Final Blog Post - Sense Making

Through the making of these blog posts, I was able to dive deeper into my own ideas and read about my peer's perspectives. This has allowed me to learn and become more understanding on how to navigate interpretation. At the beginning of the course, I described an ideal nature interpreter as engaging, knowledgeable, and adaptive. At the time, I was unsure if those were the right traits for an environmental interpreter. But now, after the readings and blog posts, I can confidently say, this is the type of interpreter I hope to be. 

Personal ethics are constantly changed based on a person's experience. They are principals that guide our actions. As interpreters, our personal ethics are used to shape how we interpret and what we share with our audience. My personal ethic that shapes who I am as an interpreter is creating an adaptive and inclusive space for everyone. This creates the greatest audience reach while maintaining a welcoming environment. Nature interpretation is greater than sharing scientific facts. Interpreters have to use their beliefs and acknowledge their responsibilities to personalize how they approach interpretation.

One of my beliefs that guides interpretation is the power of connections and community. Building relationships between people and the natural world encourages a sense of shared responsibility for the environment. Interpretation serves as a bridge that strengthens the connection between individuals and their surroundings. This further inspires actions to protect and serve the environment. Chapter three of the textbook highlights the benefits interpretation has to society. It emphasizes the positive impact on public welfare including community unity (Beck et al., 2018). When communities are well-informed, they are equipped with the ability to make informed decisions that contribute to the well-being of the people and environment. Knowing that interpretation can have this power is important to guide our work.

Another belief I bring to interpretation is that interpreters should have a personal passion for their work. Interpreters play a vital role in fostering connections which are enhanced by having passion. Interpretation is most effective when it engages a diverse audience which captures their interest through storytelling and relatable experiences. Passion for nature often stems from personal experiences that create a lasting appreciation for the environment. During my time as a camp counsellor, I used my enthusiasm for the environment and science to interpret the natural world to curious children. Their excitement provided an opportunity to share knowledge with genuine enthusiasm, creating an engaging and memorable experience for everyone. When interpreters bring personal connection to their work, it inspires the audience to develop their own connections to nature. This emotional engagement leads to a deeper understanding and appreciation of the environment, ultimately encouraging lifelong love and stewardship for the natural world.

Interpreters have responsibilities to themselves and their audience. They have the responsibility to recognize and address privilege when engaging with their audiences. Privilege shapes access and experiences in outdoor environments, influencing how individuals connect with nature. I recognize the privilege I had growing up with parents who provided opportunities to appreciate and respect nature. However, not everyone has similar experiences. As interpreters, it is essential to acknowledge that visitors come from diverse backgrounds and ensure they are treated with equity. As discussed in unit three, privilege impacts our actions and decisions which often leads to unconscious bias. By being aware of these biases, interpreters can create inclusive spaces where all voices are valued (Beck et al.). Using personal privilege can amplify underrepresented perspectives and create opportunities for others in nature. This helps foster a deeper collective appreciation for the environment. Recognizing privilege strengthens interpretation, making it more meaningful and accessible to everyone.

Interpreters also have a responsibility to encourage a sense of place and inclusivity, offering audiences an opportunity to develop a deeper connection with nature. By creating a safe and welcoming environment, interpreters encourage curiosity, awe and understanding. Chapter one of the textbook highlights how interpretation enriches experiences by sharing the full story of a place which gives it meaning and personal significance. Interpreters can help facilitate finding a sense of place through connections with their environment, culture, and history (Beck et al.). Recognizing and respecting these connections, including diverse perspectives, is essential for inclusive interpretation. Cultural sensitivity ensures all voices are valued and represented, contributing to a more meaningful understanding of the environment. Interpreters that facilitate a space where individuals feel seen and respected empower audiences to build personal connections with nature. 

Approaches that I would bring as an interpreter would include a hands-on, collaborative approach while presenting myself as an interpreter who encourages participant-driven learning. Recognizing that people have diverse learning preferences involves using many communication methods. This includes utilizing museums, art exhibits, music, websites, and trail signs to include a wide audience. By accommodating different learning styles, opportunities for more effective communication and deeper connections are created (Beck et al.). Additionally, instead of positioning myself as an authority figure, I would act as a guide who promotes discussion and curiosity. This allows for meaningful interactions and challenges the perspective of the audience. 

Encouraging dialogue and participant-driven discovery not only enhances the visitor's experience but also promotes lasting enthusiasm and interest. When individuals actively engage in learning, they form stronger and more personal connections with nature. This sense of connection can inspire commitment to environmental connection. Through inclusive and thought-provoking interpretation, I hope to empower audiences to continue exploring, questioning, and appreciating the world around them.

Beck, L., Cable, T.T., Knudson, D.M. (2018). Interpreting Cultural and Natural Heritage: For a Better World. Sagamore Publishing LLC. https://sagamore.vitalsource.com/books/9781571678669

[ed-envs3000-w25]

Hi! I loved this week's post from you :)

I think your way of describing the shift from factually-based nature interpretation to one that is deeply emotional is incredibly well-written and thought out. I wrote my post about a very similar topic in fact! People do preserve what they love in deed! I also appreciated your emphasis on accessibility and inclusion in nature interpretation. In my own post, I wrote about something similar; how you should not need an ecology, geography, or wildlife biology degree in order to understand and experience the natural world. Nature should not be a privilege, rathe it should be a right that we, as interpreters, are responsible for framing in a way that allows a wide variety of different audiences to experience. Interpretation should invite participation, not create barriers.

I also particularly liked your perspective on maintaining personal curiosity, as well as sensory-based interpretation. It is easy to become desensitized to things, such as environmental challenges, however staying properly engaged allows us to not only further inspire ourselves, rather inspires others as well. Interpretation is not about having every answer in the book, rather it is about guidance, and opening up the possibilities to discovery different perspectives. Sensory-based interpretation is a great way to do this, since it opens up a sense of belonging and deepens understanding. Great work!!

As a nature interpreter, it is a wonderful feeling to reflect back on the idea of childhood curiosity. Our first moments in nature, playing in a field, walking around with muddy shoes, and uncovering new aspects of nature that essentially shaped our identity and principles.  Overtime, my idea of interpretation has progressed from facts to emotions. Through this course, and by reading the textbook, this growth has further evolved as it taught me more about my ethics, as well as my connection and responsibility when it comes to the environment. 

Rather than simply reflecting on what I have learned, I also look at who I am becoming. It is not just a job, but a way of being in this world. One of the beliefs I have gained is the idea of connection being a guide to the path of protection. People tend to preserve what they love and care about. This may not stem from a bunch of written data and reports presented up front, but the moment of a powerful connection to the natural world.  Instead of simply transferring information as an interpreter, I believe that it is our role to prompt people’s connection with the natural world through emotions, storytelling, and more. As the textbook says, the purpose of interpretation is to promote interest and thought, which eventually results in change and action (Beck et al., 2018). The final goal is to invoke responsibility. But if I was able to spark some curiosity or aid in someone’s journey through nature, I have done my job. Another belief I bring is the idea that nature is not detached from us, as we are not tourists on this earth, but are a part of it. This view is important as it gives me the ability to develop experiences that are not only done by perceiving the world, but allows others to build a relationship with it. To form emotional connections with places, people need to feel a sense of belonging, as they are a part of the ecosystem. Finally, I believe that everyone has the right to obtain access to natural experiences, regardless of the type of privilege one has or doesn't have. As interpreters, we need to reflect on our actions and how they may include others. This includes the way we articulate our words, the things we assume, and how we imagine our audience. With these principles, there are certain responsibilities that come about; to both people and nature itself. 

One of my responsibilities is to communicate information truthfully and with respect. There is lots of misinformation out there, especially during this modern age in which many people may already feel isolated from the outdoors. Therefore, it is important to my audiences that I spread correct information that they can depend on wholly. Although this can feel “like you are trying to stop a rushing river armed only with a teaspoon”, as Rodenburg says, the role as an interpreter is to build a space for hope. Whether it is by spreading awareness of certain environmental issues or trying to help others build a relationship with nature, all actions matter. Small actions still make a difference. It is also important to recognize the manner in which I am speaking about certain experiences or facts. Maintaining respect to those who may own the land or possibly do not have the access to certain opportunities, allows everyone to feel included, which is a major goal in interpretation.

Another responsibility I have is to make interpretation as accessible as possible. This also relates to the idea of inclusion, as there are many diverse ways that people can relate to different nature experiences. The textbook speaks on the relevancy of interpreting to match the audience’s own experiences. This includes understanding who my audience is, making sure the facts are correct, and being open to a conversation where both the audience and the interpreter are gaining further understanding. 

Personally, I feel like I have to have a responsibility for myself as well, where I need to keep my own admiration and curiosity for. nature. If I become too used to the beauty or different issues, essentially becoming numb to it, I cannot expect others to connect to nature through my voice. Practicing what I advocate is crucial in order to avoid hypocrisy and promote true connection. 

This course has taught me that not all interpretation is the same. There are different styles, strengths, etc., that form the kind of interpreter one is. As an individual, the approach that suits me best is sensory-based. I believe that touching, experiencing, smelling, and using all our senses is the most efficient way for me to immerse myself into nature. Touching leaves, smelling the fresh air, hearing birds chirping and the ruffles of leaves, playing with animals, are all experiences that leave an impact on someone who is seeking a grounding moment as a kinesthetic learner. It is also a way to leave lasting memories of moments in nature, as it can impact one’s perspective and mindset. Creating safe spaces in which others can be curious in, is an approach that works best for me, so I would love to implement this through my role as an interpreter. Regardless of someone’s idea of an “outdoor” person, or their inability to name a bunch of facts while outside, they deserve to feel like there is a place in nature for them, as that is how deep learning begins. 

Through the teachings of the textbook, the intention of inspiring, not just teaching, is more impactful. Interpretation is not about having every answer. Therefore, by asking the right questions while giving people guidance,  true interpretation from the audience can be created. 

As we close this chapter of our ENVS*3000 course, I am able to carry with me the many lessons I have learnt throughout. Simply pausing to observe a little squirrel, or having a conversation beside a tree, are all little moments that can ripple out to great things, in ways that we may never know. Keep that sense of wonder that we all had as kids. That is our greatest asset as humans; our ability to be curious and diving into the unknown. 

References

Beck, L., Cable, T. T., & Knudson, D. M. (2018). Interpreting cultural and natural heritage for a better world (1st ed.). Sagamore Publishing.

Louv, R. (2008). Last child in the woods: Saving our children from nature-deficit disorder. Algonquin Books.

[ed-envs3000-w25]

Unit 10 Blog Post

If there is one thing I have learned throughout this course, it is that nature interpretation involves significantly more work than you would think. Nature interpretation is more than just sharing facts; rather it is about helping to connect the everyday, mundane lives we live, with the beauty intertwined within the natural world. As an interpreter, my personal ethic is rooted in the idea that we, as humans, overcomplicate life. When you look at the big picture, nature in itself is quite simple, and direct. The relationship between humans and nature is often heavily overcomplicated, and we often forget to experience and appreciate what is in front of us in the present moment. 

Our job as interpreters is not to complicate nature any further; rather it is to strop away the noise and reconnect people with what they already know. Interpretation should not feel like a university lecture, or a scientific paper with complex terminology you would need a degree to understand. It should, however, be something which helps others see, feel, and experience the natural world. Interpretation, when done right, is about revealing the meaning of something in a manner that resonates with people’s emotions and lived experiences (Beck et al., 2018). 

Nature should be interpreted with simplicity, clarity, and presence. Rather than overwhelming people with scientific theories and complicated vocabulary, my approach to nature interpretation emphasizes a focus on storytelling, connection, and moving beyond intellectualization, allowing for sensitivity once in a while. People remember stories, and the emotional weight carried with them, not simple facts being stated. Storytelling acts as a bridge, and makes interpretation engaging and emotionally resonant (Beck et al., 2018). 

Meaning is not something which always needs to be invented; rather sometimes, we simply need to open our eyes and see what is right in front of us. As a nature interpreter, my aim is to create space for quiet observation and reflection. The rustling of leaves in the wind, the scent of the warm, moist dirt in the morning after a night of heavy rainfall. Nature is constantly communicating; we just need to listen to what it is trying to tell us. 

Good interpretation should encourage both mental and emotional responses from the listeners (Beck et al., 2018) rather than passively intaking information. Simplicity is what allows for curiosity and wonder, thus introducing the magic of discovery. My goal is to spark this curiosity, so people seek out answers for themselves, in a way in which they will continue to remember what they have learned. When we over explain, we take away the magic of discovery and learning. Less is more when interpreting nature, in order to allow for personal interest to spark and depthen curiosity and knowledge. 

Too often, we treat nature as something separate to ourselves. Rather than thinking of our planet as a common home we all share, interpreters often create this perception that nature is an exhibit to be studied. My personal ethic aims to remind people that we are all members of this natural world, and not simply outsiders looking in as though you would observe a panda in a zoo. This shift in perspective will hopefully foster respect, responsibility, and depthen the connection. 

As a nature interpreter, I see my role as someone who removes the barriers which lead to the overcomplication of the natural world. To do this, I plan on focusing on three main responsibilities. Firstly, I plan to encourage direct, personal experiences. Rather than telling people about ecosystems while they look at it from afar, I would allow them the ability to actively experience touching tree bark, listening to bird calls, feeling the temperature shifting between climates, etc., in order to help foster connections. Secondly, I aim to strip away unnecessary complexity. While scientific accuracy is important, not every moment in nature requires excessive explanation. There may be moments where silence is the best response. In the summertime, I often spend my evenings outdoors on my porch, watching the sunset and listening to the birds as their song slowly fades as they sleep while the sun goes down. Allowing for people to absorb and process their own emotions in response to a breathtaking view, or a rare wildlife sighting is what leads to stronger connections than simply providing a surplus of unnecessary information. Finally, I plan to keep knowledge accessible. Not everyone has a background in ecology, geography, or wildlife biology. To be completely fair, they should not require one in order to appreciate nature. Beck et al. (2018) emphasize that interpretation should be inclusive. My goal is to ensure that anyone and everyone, regardless of educational background or experience, feels welcome in natural spaces, by using simple, clear, and relatable language that makes nature inviting, rather than intimidating. 

In a world where we are constantly bombarded with information, nature offers us a chance to slow down, observe, and reconnect. My personal ethic is rooted in this idea: we do not need to over complicate our relationship with nature. We should, rather, embrace simplicity, allow for discovery and recognize that the most valuable connections come from what we experience, not simply from what we are told. Beck et al. (2018) remind us that interpretation should inspire, not simply provide knowledge. In my experiences, the most inspiring moments in nature are when we strip away the excess, turn down the noise of the past and future, and simply listen to what is around us in the present moment. Nature has always been communicating with us, since the beginning of time. Our job is simply to listen.

Beck, L., Cable, T.T., & Knudson, D.M. (2018). Interpreting Cultural and Natural Heritage for a Better World. Sagamore Publishing.

[ed-envs3000-w25]

Hey!

I really found your post captivating. First and foremost I just wanted to say your writing style is very engaging, and easy to read! I like the way you integrate storytelling into your interpretations. It really helps to bring the Toronto wildlife to life! It’s incredible how nature thrives in the least expected places. I feel that it reminds us that the wild isn’t confined to remote jungles or vast mountains, rather it’s woven into our everyday lives, even in a big city like Toronto.

I feel that your post allows for a new perspective of seeing the city. Rather than interpreting downtown Toronto as a concrete jungle, it can also be seen as an evolving ecosystem, where nature and urban life coexist. It’s a call to be more observant, and to appreciate the raccoons, owls, foxes, and even the butterflies that migrate through our skies.

I also love your mention of the story with the red fox! I have had a very similar encounter myself, and funny enough, I never saw that fox ever again in my area! All I have is a terrible picture to go with it (and for some reason, "What Does The Fox Say" by Ylvis getting stuck in my head, every time I think of it).

Great work overall!

Unit 09: Sense-Making of Nature Interpretation

If you asked me where you might discover nature's most spectacular wonders, I'd probably surprise you with the answer: here in Toronto. You don't have to go into the Amazon or climb the Rockies to see something spectacular nature is occurring all around us, even in the heart of the city. Allow me to take you on a voyage into an untamed realm that lies in plain sight. During a late-night walk in High Park, I witnessed one of the most breathtaking sights I've ever seen. I expected solitude or the distant bustle of the city, but the park was bustling. A family of raccoons gazed down at me from a branch, their veiled features interested yet apprehensive. A great horned owl hooted in the distance, merging into the darkness. And then came the moment I'll never forget: a red fox rushed across the path, its coat shimmering beneath the streetlight. It paused for a little while, locking eyes with me as if noticing my presence, before retreating into the trees. How many of us stroll through the city every day, unaware that we share it with creatures who have adapted to our environment? The city is not only built of glass buildings and concrete it's a stage for one of the most amazing plays I've ever seen. If I've learnt anything about Toronto's fauna, it's that they are masters of survival. A great horned owl hooted in the distance, merging into the darkness. And then came the moment I'll never forget: a red fox rushed across the path, its coat shimmering beneath the streetlight. It paused for a little while, locking eyes with me as if noticing my presence, before retreating into the trees. How many of us stroll through the city every day, unaware that we share it with creatures who have adapted to our environment? The city is not only built of glass buildings and concrete it's a stage for one of the most amazing plays I've ever seen. If I've learnt anything about Toronto's fauna, it's that they are masters of survival. How many of us stroll through the city every day, unaware that we share it with creatures who have adapted to our environment? The city is not only built of glass buildings and concrete it's a stage for one of the most amazing plays I've ever seen. If I've learnt anything about Toronto's fauna, it's that they are masters of survival. Did you know that these amazing birds, who were formerly endangered, have made an amazing return by developing on Toronto's tallest buildings? They see our towers as cliffs, the ideal hunting grounds for their high-speed dives. Peregrines are the world's fastest creatures, reaching speeds of nearly 300 km/h while diving for food. That means the fastest living mammal might be swooping over you while you have your morning coffee downtown. How fantastic is that? For those who believe that nature is far removed from city life, I challenge them to visit the Don Valley, Rouge National Urban Park, or even the Toronto Islands.These areas are rich with biodiversity. In the Don Valley, I once witnessed a beaver meticulously building a reservoir in the midst of a city famed for its busy streets and towering buildings. Rouge Park, Canada's first national urban park, is home to deer, endangered turtles, and more than 200 bird species. And don't forget about the monarch butterflies, which pass through Toronto every fall before flying thousands of kilometers to Mexico. Imagine a small butterfly flying over a whole continent! What is the best part? You don't have to go anyplace special to experience nature's majesty; it's just in your own backyard. Nature is not separate from us; it is integrated into our daily existence. And when we pay closer attention, we realize how remarkable it is. So, the next time you stroll around Toronto, take a moment to look up, listen carefully, and enjoy the wild environment that thrives right beside us.

[ed-envs3000-w25]

Unit 9 Post -- The Most Amazing Thing About Nature

Nature is quite amazing (Although, that might be a biased opinion, considering the whole theme of this blog) 

There is a quiet magic in seashells. Since we were children, cartoons used to tell us that if we hold one up to our ears, we can hear the sound of the ocean; waves rolling onto an imaginary shore. As we have grown older, however, the real question is: what are we really hearing? Seashells are nature’s very own, tiny amphitheaters. Many believe that they hold the captured memories of the waves; as if the sounds echoing through the hidden chambers within are fragments of the ocean’s voice, trapped within the spirals of the seashell. 

The truth of the music of a seashell is, in reality, a phenomenon of physics! The smooth interiors and curved hollows inside the shells act as resonators. Collecting the ambient noise of the surrounding area, such as the wind, waves crashing ashore, or leaves rustling in the wind, the sound bounces within the interior of the shells, resulting in a soft mimic of the flow of waves in the ocean. 

The intensity you can hear in the waves within the seashell will change, depending on the noise level in the room. On a windy beach, the sound is deeper; whereas in a quiet room, the sound resembles a slow tide. The reality is that the shell in itself, does not generate noise; rather, it reshapes existing sounds from ordinary to extraordinary! 

The beauty of this phenomenon is that it mirrors the way the ocean speaks in itself. Waves are not singular voices, but the result of multiple sources of sound surrounding us; regardless of our proximity to the ocean. Beck et al. (2018) remind us in the textbook that true nature interpretation should reveal deeper connections and meaning, rather than simply sharing the facts about a topic. The whisper of a seashell is not but a mere acoustic trick; rather it is a metaphor, and a reminder that nature is always speaking; all we have to do is listen!

Perhaps this is why seashells captivate us so deeply. Their physical beauty is just as enticing as their metaphorical beauty. Seashells are remnants of each fragment of time, carried through the ripples of the water, eventually brought into our hands. They can transport us back to a childhood beach trip, a distant summer, or a moment in time, so special to us. So, the next time you pick up a shell, do yourself a favour and hold it up to your ear. Let yourself believe in the whisper of the waves, because the most extraordinary truths are the ones we choose to hear.  Beck, L., Cable, T.T., & Knudson, D.M. (2018). Interpreting Cultural and Natural Heritage for a Better World. Sagamore Publishing.

[ed-envs3000-w25]

Your blog post is absolutely amazing!

Music therapy was actually a field of study and career I very genuinely contemplated prior to starting university. It makes me so happy to see it being spoken about! Music is something that makes life worth living; even among other animals!

I think it is incredibly fascinating how humans integrate nature into music! One song I used to listen to quite a bit, called "meaningless" by WOODZ, is a really good example of this! In summary, the singer wrote this song in discussion of his battle with depression. He sings:

"You said that weather decides feelings I feel bad about the weather That's different from how I feel Until when should I wait for the rain? When will the sky wash me?"

Later on, he sings:

"I want to lie on the cloud I don't want to care about anything The things that tormented me I want to say goodbye to them and stay warm"

As he sings this, in the back sound you can hear he sampled the sounds of heavy rain, further accentuating his desire to feel the light of day again, and to feel the warmth. At the end of the song, you can hear sounds of the rain coming to an end; symbolizing that the storm does end one day, and that life does get better. Nature allows for us to feel music even further than the lyrics within a song. Great work!

Unit 7: Nature Interpretation through Music

To begin this week's blog on Nature Interpretation through music, I want to bring up this quote from the course content.

“It is said that every known human culture has music. Music has been defined as patterns of sound varying in pitch and time produced for emotional, social, cultural, and cognitive purposes. Is music-making in humans defined by our genes? Do other species show musical language and expression? If they do, what kinds of behavior invoke musicmaking in these animals? Is there evidence in the animal kingdom for the ability to create and recreate a musical language with established musical sounds? How are musical sounds used to communicate within and between species? Do musical sounds in nature reveal a profound bond between all living things?” Gray, P. Krause, B. Atema, J., Payne, R., Krumhansl, C. & Baptista, L. (2001). The Music of Nature and the Nature of Music. Science. 291. 52-54.

I find it so interesting how music can be found in nature! 

Birds singing to attract mates 

Croaking frog to find mates and defend territories

The peaceful sounds of water

Buzzing of bees

There is something so relaxing, peaceful, and even nostalgic about listening to all of the sounds of nature. And not just for humans! All kinds of animals interact with music in their day to day lives. Videos have been surfacing online of cows being intrigued and gathering to listen to music. 

An article by Ciborowaska et al. (2021), The Effect of Music on Livestock: Cattle, Poultry and Pigs, explains how music therapy, popular amongst humans, is being used for farm animals as a form of enrichment and a way to reduce stress, and increase animal production as a result.

Music in nature is everywhere. It's in the rhythmic crashing of waves, the whispering leaves in the wind. These sounds are more than just background noise, they are melodies created by the environment, shaping the way we experience nature,

Music is also deeply connected to nature in the way humans have incorporated natural sounds into songs. Indigenous cultures often use elements of nature in their music, from the sounds of water to the calls of animals, reflecting a deep connection to the land and its rhythms (National Arts Centre, n.d.). Even in Western music, sounds of nature are used as instruments such as Blackbird by the Beatles, which features bird tweeting sounds.

The connection between music and nature is also deeply personal. Certain songs can immediately transport us to a specific time and place, tied to the landscapes and moments where we first heard them. For me, My Sweet Lord by George Harrison brings back memories of summer at my old cottage. My dad used to play it while we sat by the lake. The song’s gentle, flowing rhythm blended perfectly with the peaceful surroundings, making it feel like the soundtrack to my summers. Even now, whenever I hear it, I can imagine the scene so vividly.

This is something I’m sure many people can relate to, and it reinforces how music is not just something we hear, but something we feel and something that can connect us deeper into our surroundings. Music could be a useful tool in nature interpretation to help people connect with nature.

What songs take you back to a special place in nature? Can you think of any other songs which feature nature sounds?

Ciborowska P, Michalczuk M, Bień D. (2021) The Effect of Music on Livestock: Cattle, Poultry and Pigs. Animals (Basel), 11(12). https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8698046/

National Arts Centre. (n.d.) Nitohta: Listen to Earthsounds. Accessed on February 25, 2025, from https://nac-cna.ca/en/artsalive/resource/nitohta-listen-to-earthsounds/module/35853#:~:text=Murray%20Schafer-,Indigenous%20music,repeated%20over%20lengthy%20chant%20phrases.

[ed-envs3000-w25]

Music in Nature Interpretation

A fun fact about me is that I have always been very drawn to two things: the outdoors, and music. In a grade twelve music class, I remember having to produce my own song for my final project. I recall when producing, though I spent hours and hours in front of my laptop, I could not figure out what was missing. Eventually, I realized that I was missing the sound of rainfall, to accentuate the feeling of a comforting, moonlit night. In nature, music is in everything. Of course, it is obviously in the song of a bird’s chirping (Gray et al. 2001), however it is also in the rustle of the wind through leaves in a forest, and in the sound of a pebble falling into a lake. As mentioned in the Gray et al. (2001) reading, even the sounds of whales have been recorded for their beauty, and for their use in stories as well. The natural occurrences of nature are more than what we as people interpret as simple background noise; they are their own compositions, and forms of music. Animals themselves in order to attract mates, will sometimes sing songs to find suitable partners. 

What people fail to recognize is the high presence of nature in music. In contemporary music, artists will very frequently sample the sounds of nature into their songs, to add to the emotional component and aspect of their pieces. If not in the music itself, references to the beauty of nature can be made in the lyrics as well. Take for example, in the lyrics of “Falling Behind” by Laufey, she mentions that “The sun’s engaged to the sky” to symbolise the beauty and relationship between the two, and how they cannot be without one another. Indigenous communities globally have also incorporated nature in their cultural music, ever since the prehistoric times (Gray et al. 2001). 

Personally, music is what helps me feel, while nature is what brings me to the present moment. One song which takes me back to natural landscapes is “Hawayein,” a Hindi song sung by Arijit Singh. When I was in first year, my mental health weighed down on me an exponential amount. In short, living away from home on campus was not a wise decision, especially considering I lived a commutable distance. Every week, I would go home on Thursdays, and be driven back Sunday evening. The drive from my home to Guelph was quite scenic, considerably when taking the backroads. In that moment, this song would frequently play as I stared at the autumn leaves changing and flying through the wind. All I could think of was how desperately I wished I could be at peace, floating gracefully like the leaves falling from the trees, allowing the winds to take me wherever they wish. The comfort this song gave me was like one I could not describe, however one thing is certain; it provided me with strength to experience its beauty while experiencing the beauty of the greenery we drove through. 

“Le jaaye jaane kahan, hawayein, hawayein

Where are the winds taking us

Le jaaye tujhe kahan, hawayein, hawayein

Where are the winds taking you

Begaani hai yeh baghi, hawayein, hawayein

These winds are rebellious

Le jaaye mujhe kahan, hawayein, hawayein

Where are the winds taking me

Le jaaye jaane kahan, na mujhko khabar, na tujhko pata

Where is the wind taking us, neither of us know"

Gray, P. M., Krause, B., Atema, J., Payne, R., Krumhansl, C., & Baptista, L. (2001). The Music of Nature and the Nature of Music. Science, 291(5501), 52. https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A69270354/AONE?u=guel77241&sid=bookmark-AONE&xid=fb9366a8

NOTE: I have translated the lyrics to the best of my abilities, it is a beautiful song though! Here's a link to it: https://youtu.be/cYOB941gyXI?si=9FDFjznDlJu8BvEb

[ed-envs3000-w25]

Hi Marcus!

I love the ideas you mention in your blog post! In particular, I love your interpretation of Hyams' quote, where you mention that intrinsic value comes from integrity. I find that is especially relevant in interpretations today (even outside of the natural aspect of things). People like to pretend that the past never happened, or that even if it did, times have changed, and that what has happened is no longer relevant. In my opinion, that is a terrible perspective to have. We cannot ignore history. We cannot pretend that the past never happened, purely because we would not be where we are today as a society without it. I feel that this applies very strongly in the context of Indigenous peoples. Many people today would try to suggest that landscapes and nature in Canada is "shared property" between Indigenous peoples and those of Canadian heritage; however, this fails to acknowledge that there was not much of a choice for the Indigenous people of the land. Integrity in this practice means respecting and accurately representing Indigenous knowledge, rather than appropriating or misinterpreting it. Intrinsic value and integrity are maintained among Indigenous people and their practices through respecting the land, and sharing the correct, respected meanings of what nature brings to mankind.

When interpreters are telling the stories of our land, it is vital for them to include Indigenous knowledge, more importantly to recognize and understand the hardships that they went through historically. Canada is a country built on stolen land. If we do not acknowledge that, we are erasing not only the generations of individuals who fought for their homes, however also the intrinsic value that comes with our integrity. Amazing post!

Integrity in Nature Interpretation

This week we were tasked with unpacking a quote by Edwards Hyams from Chapter 7 of The Gifts of Interpretation, “There is no peculiar merit in ancient things, but there is merit in integrity, and integrity entails the keeping together of the parts of any whole, and if these parts are scattered throughout time, then the maintenance of integrity entails a knowledge, a memory, of ancient things. …. To think, feel or act as though the past is done with, is equivalent to believing that a railway station through which our train has just passed, only existed for as long as our train was in it.” (Edward Hyams, Chapter 7, The Gifts of Interpretation).

Edward Hymas is stating that just because something is ancient or old or any synonym for something before an audience’s time, does not mean that it has worth. If you were to think of any rock you come across walking down the street, it is not of value because it older than any human on earth, rather its chemical composition, its geographical history and ecological importance is where its value most likely stems from. Intrinsic value comes from understanding the broader understanding of something of things, past and present and sometimes even future. Which is what the next part of the quote was referring to, essentially, intrinsic value comes form integrity. Where in order to have integrity as a nature interpreter, storyteller you must tell stories that hold integrity themselves. They should capture a wider scope than a glimpse of one part of the story or hold more than only one glimpse of one moment in time. In the quote, it simplifies the concept saying that not maintaining integrity is like believing that something only exists while you are present. I believe that the quote is fancy way of saying, egocentrism is bad, and that a lot of the wonderful, beautiful things come from sense of community, and community thrives best with roots that go deeper than just one person, group of people, and moment of time.  This is important to nature interpretation, because it reminds us of the need to have integrity in the stories that are told, to include everything that makes the place, subjects or people

Organizations like the International Coalition of Sites of Conscience (ICSC) and the National Park Service for the United States seem to be good role models for the perspective shared from the quote. The ICSC aims to utilize landmarks to inspire public engagement, bridging the past and present to envision and cultivate a more just and humane future, here is the link to their website Home - Sites of Conscience. While the National Park Service continues to try and focus on maintaining integrity of parks, by sharing multiple stories and perspectives to their park’s history. Here is an old video that was shared with us in class: https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/tZ9DM-MoTXA.

Beck, L., Cable, T. T., & Knudson, D. M. (2018). Interpreting cultural and natural heritage for a better world. Sagamore Publishing.

[ed-envs3000-w25]

Unpacking the Railway Station of Life

As I mentioned in my last blog post, I am a student in the Bachelor of Arts and Sciences program. This entails the fact that I am not only a student in STEM, rather I am also studying topics in the arts and humanities. As a result of this, I also frequently converse with students in both fields of study, and I get to learn and understand the perspectives of two vastly different types of individuals. One thing is for sure, I have made note of several occasions where my STEM friends belittle and make a mockery of those who are in non-STEM fields of study; topics such as family relations and human development, history, english, creative writing, and more. Belittling the humanities assumes that only technical knowledge has some sort of merit. Denying creativity and critical thinking the right to be considered “worthy” in debates of education suggests that understanding and thoroughly evaluating based on the knowledge of those who came before us is irrelevant, once we move beyond that moment in time. 

Edward Hyams’ quote from The Gifts of Interpretation explores the importance of historical awareness in all methods of maintaining integrity. He argues that the value associated with history comes with the application and maintenance of connections which have been made in the past, that can continue to be made in the future. The past is what allows us to progress in the future, and we must acknowledge it in order to maintain integrity. The relevance of the experiences and important events which have happened yesterday are mandatory in order to not repeat the same mistakes tomorrow. 

Hyams’ analogy of the train station beautifully conveys the message of his idea, considerably in a time as such we exist in today. It is easy to pretend that history is “of the past,” however those who were truly affected continue to be visited by that same train on a regular basis. In order to truly understand our world, historical and critical knowledge must be accessed with high degrees of respect and understanding. Some STEM students I have run into in my university career (and to be honest, even outside of schooling!) argue that because they focus on events that have already happened, humanities are irrelevant; the same way Hyams’ analogy believes that a railway station is meaningless once the train has passed through. What this perspective fails to acknowledge, however, is that history, philosophy, and the arts continue to inform and facilitate critical thinking and interpretation (which, in turn, is also highly relevant to scientific thoughts as well). 

When STEM majors dismiss and belittle the humanities, they fail to recognize the interconnection of disciplines and history, and how they relate to the way we interpret the world today. Even environmental scientists can sometimes overlook the historical interpretations of nature that Indigenous groups may have maintained. To interpret nature meaningfully, we must acknowledge the full picture. The wisdom accumulated through every stop of the train at the railway station is what shapes our perception of the world, moreover how we plan to move forward in it.

[ed-envs3000-w25]

Hi Chayse!

Your blog post truly resonates with me. Scientific communication plays such a heavy role on the ways in which society interprets and accepts information. The "anti-science" conspiracy theories is incredibly prevalent in today's modern society; quite frequently seen among people who are often too stubborn to interpret information past their own personal opinions. Having a respectful outlook and an open mind is key when conversing with someone in regards to topics where there is disagreement between scientifically backed ideas. The best way to tackle a situation such as this, is to ensure the use of properly credible sources and information; as well as unbiased research tactics.

In my first year ASCI*1110 and ASCI*1120 classes, we spent a majority of our time discussing fallacies, biases, and expertise. In this class we discussed the concept of "big T Truths," the objective state of the world, and "little t truths", what we perceive and believe to be the state of the world. Our definitions of nearly any topic and truths are ever-changing, depending on our personal interpretations. An expert in one topic is not necessarily an expert in another topic (ex. you would not ask a politician about the side effects of Accutane), therefore the problem lies in the sources of these personal interpretations.

Although increased access to scientific communications would be extremely beneficial, there would still likely be credibility problems that may need to be addressed. For example, Andrew Wakefield's work, which led to the influx of individuals believing that vaccinations should not be mandated and/or mandatory, was a published, peer reviewed paper. How do you think we could tackle the credibility problem of the experts who write scientific papers and information, in order to successfully re-frame the perspectives of those who refuse to believe in scientific word?

Week 5 Blog Post

The content of this week’s unit really resonated with me, especially since it was closely related to a long conversation that I was having yesterday before going through the readings. Yesterday I went to get a tattoo, over the several hours that I was sitting, I chatted with the artist about many things, but the conversation kept coming back to various environmental/conservation topics. One topic that we discussed was the importance of accessible scientific information.

               As someone that has been trained in science for many years, it is easy to overlook the importance of effective scientific communication with the general public. For myself, I feel that this is something I overlooked, especially at the beginning of my education. I never really thought about what other people think of science, and when people seemed like they didn’t care, I never spent much energy trying to get them to care. While “getting someone to care” isn’t the ultimate goal of interpretation, it is important to be able to reframe your point so that it is meaningful to the person you are interpreting to.

               Conversations like this are easy and smooth when the person you are interpreting to has a similar world view to you. For example, my tattoo artist and I both have a pretty similar world view, therefore both of us tended to agree with what the other was saying which propelled the conversation forward. At one point she had mentioned that she has a family member that was radicalized towards believing many anti-science conspiracy theories, where we then began discussing the importance of still having respectful conversation with those that disagree with you.

               It can be disheartening trying to share your worldview with someone that disagrees with it, however there is always some benefit to trying. If one is always respectful in conversations like this, and provide evidence-based conversation points, there is always the possibility that you have opened somebody’s eyes to a new worldview. While I used a rather extreme example, there is always going to be people that don’t agree with a certain part of your world view, even if they agree with you mostly. This shows the importance of being respectful and understanding in each interpretive context, because it is the only way to open the door to someone possibly seeing something from your point of view- if someone feels looked down upon by you, they are more likely to be apprehensive to exploring your world view.

               Another way to make science more accessible to the general public is to involve them through citizen science programs like the ones mentioned in this week’s readings! The Adina et al. paper from 2016 was a great reflection of this idea, they found that people who had participated in naturalist programs felt more confident about their contributions to conservation and continued to participate in citizen science. It is not just the environmental scientists and biologists that care about saving the environment, so many ‘average joes’ want to help too- we, as scientists and interpreters, just need to provide the tools people need to contribute.

[ed-envs3000-w25]

Medicinal Plants -- A Way Nature Was Historically Interpreted!

When I think about my days in High School now, and the pressures that came with being seventeen years old, having to decide what I would like to pursue my education in in order to succeed in my career in the future. Needless to say, I am grateful I chose the Bachelor of Arts and Sciences (BAS) program, in particular due to the freedom I am given to be able to choose to minor in one science program, and any one arts program. With that, I chose to study a minor in biology and in sociology. 

The beauty of my biology minor was that I was able to take all of the necessary classes to earn my certification, all while still having space and freedom to take several biological science electives (hence, why I am taking this class!). Last semester, I was able to take HORT*3270, an entire, three hour lecture which was dedicated to medicinal plants. The class content discussed different systems of traditional medicine, the processes used to regulate and ensure high quality supply, the importance of conserving these practices, and more. As we progress in this nature interpretation class, I frequently begin to notice the correlation and links between the topics discussed in both classes; as well as the role that interpretation plays in medicinal plants. 

Nature interpretation often involves storytelling. Many traditional medicinal practices are generationally taught through the art of legends, folklore, and elders sharing their knowledge. As time progressed, these plants and their benefits became an important framework for the creation and foundation of many modern medicines. In the medicinal plants class, last semester, I was given the opportunity to present the historical and modern uses of the willow tree. 

In traditional Chinese medicine and Indigenous practices, the willow tree was known as a plant withholding many healing properties. The different parts of the plant were used for different remedies, due to its high levels of salicin; a chemical found in what is known today as “Aspirin”. Historically, willow bark and leaves were used to brew tea, or could have been chewed in order to cure fever, pain, inflammation, and several other health conditions. 

Traditional medicinal practices provide a rich historical and cultural narrative about how humans have interacted with plants for healing. Historical interpretations of the nature around Indigenous groups globally have led to a connection between science and culture, in turn adding more meaning and value to the world around us. Real life nature interpretation practices, such as tours and conservation park guides, should include segments which highlight the medicinal uses of certain crops, plants, and organisms found in natural areas. In this way, individuals can each do their own part to conserve not only these highly valuable and beneficial plants, rather to also protect and continue to share the stories and practices in which elders and ancestors of our past have used for centuries. 

[ed-envs3000-w25]

Hi Sara!

Your painting is incredibly beautiful!

Your blog post is incredibly well written, and I could not agree with you more! Interpreting nature, and beauty in general, is in the eye of the beholder (as the saying commonly goes). It is up to the interpretation of the individual to determine what they consider as beauty in art.

I am a firm believer that humans were meant to live freely and enjoy life through arts and creativity; rather than being cooped up in an office space for the vast majority of our lives. The colour and brightness of art creates life for people when they are unable to find natural sources of it; thus it adds depth our connections not only with one another when we share our interpretation of these pieces, rather of how we see the world around us as well.

Once again I'd like to mention that this was so incredibly amazingly written! Paying attention to the details in nature can be grounding in moments of stress for so many; I am glad you are able to achieve this through art.

Unit 4- The Art of Interpretation

Who am I to interpret nature through art? It’s a question that both humbles and motivates me. It humbles me because nature is vast, complex, and beyond any one person’s full understanding. But it also pushes me to contribute my own perspective, to engage with the landscape in a way that feels personal and meaningful.

Beauty is subjective, but how we interpret it matters. Rita Cantu once wrote, “If the songs are not sung and the stories are not told, danced, painted, or acted, our spirits will die as well.” This idea resonates with me—without creative expression, our connection to nature can fade into the background of daily life. Art, in any form, keeps that connection alive.

The Group of Seven captured this idea well, painting Canada’s landscapes with an energy that made them feel alive. Their work inspires me in my own occasional painting practice. For me, painting is more than just an artistic exercise—it’s a way to slow down and pay attention. It allows me to see nature differently, to engage with it rather than just pass through it.

I’ve always been drawn to trees, particularly how they change through the seasons. A bare winter tree standing against a blizzard isn’t just a cold, skeletal form—it’s a symbol of resilience. In spring, that same tree bursts with life, a reminder of renewal. Each season tells a different story, and painting those transformations helps me understand and appreciate them more deeply.

At its core, interpretation isn’t just about depicting beauty—it’s about helping others see it too. Whether through painting, writing, or simply noticing, we all have the ability to share our perspective and, in doing so, foster a deeper appreciation for the natural world.

So, who am I to interpret nature? I’m someone who takes the time to look, to listen, and to express what I see in my own way. And that’s all any of us can do. No single interpretation will ever capture the full essence of nature, but each perspective adds to the larger conversation.

Interpreting nature through art isn’t about getting it “right.” It’s about engaging with the world in a way that feels meaningful. Painting reminds me to pay attention, to notice the small details, and to appreciate the beauty that surrounds me. And if that appreciation inspires someone else to do the same, then the interpretation has done its job.

A recent painting of mine captures a tree in a blizzard, inspired by the current winter weather!

[ed-envs3000-w25]

Interpreting Nature Through Art

“Sonder” is a feeling in which an individual comes to terms with the concept that everyone has their own lives, ideas, and situations. With each individual comes a different personality with different perspectives; all of which come into play in interpretation. Different artists will paint pictures of their interpretations of the world which surrounds them, depending on their life circumstances. This is an example of sonder. A painting of a butterfly may be interpreted by one as symbolism for grief, and the circle of life; while another may consider it a message that patience is key in order to flourish and transform in life. Artwork acts as the bridge between the beauty of nature and the soul. 

When looking at and judging a natural environment, it is very easy to only see what is in front of you. If you picture a vast field of grass, you most likely are not thinking of the beetles crawling on the surface, or the patches of grass which differ in length. An artist creates artwork based on their interpretation of the natural environment which surrounds them, and spreads their ideas in order to allow spectators to experience the beauty they once sought. Art is the medium through which the perspective of the original viewer is shared. When an artist interprets the beauty of nature, they are able to emphasize certain details which may be less obvious to the naked eye. This is, in short, the gift of beauty. 

If we are able to search for the deeper meanings found within a nature based art piece, we invite the emotional capacity within us to truly experience nature on a level greater than physical. Art allows for us to draw attention to the unnoticed wonders of the world; not necessarily creating the beauty, rather opening the curtains to what was first underlooked. Artists offer the gift of beauty to all, as it is not a material item that one can (or should) possess; rather it is a right we all pertain to as living creatures on this planet. 

The question at the end of the night is: who am I to interpret nature through art? As much as capitalism and materialism forces us to try and believe we must divide and take ownership of as much as possible, nature is not something which can be possessed. You cannot “own” the beauty and timelessness of the wind blowing through the trees, or the colourful leaves in autumn. You can however, possess your own interpretations of these experiences, and share your stories with others. Interpreting nature is not a concrete definition and definitive truth for the phenomena seen in natural environments, rather it allows the collection of viewpoints and perceptions among a variety of different individuals.

[ed-envs3000-w25]

This is such a great perspective! I never really thought about the ways in which this would also intersect with the landscape architecture career. Privilege most definitely plays a major role in how therapeutic landscapes are constructed and brought to life! My blog post was mostly discussing the lack of importance given to Indigenous voices and perspectives when looking at the euro-centric lens in which individuals interpret conservation parks. What could be "comforting" to one because of their interpretation, could be traumatizing to another. I love the idea you bring about providing free and/or inexpensive programs to allow for multiple perspectives and individuals to interpret an area meant for comfort and healing. At the end of the night, we are all people before we are divided. We bleed the same, regardless of the socially constructed differences which assign us our levels of privilege. You are completely right; everyone deserves access to the healing powers of nature! Great work :)

Blog 3 Post: Privilege in Nature Interpretation

As a 4th year landscape architect student here at Guelph, I wrote my thesis on therapeutic landscapes, more specifically, analysing their role in healthcare settings and their ability to support physical, mental, and emotional well-being. I’ve come to realize that, just like in many other aspects of life, privilege plays a significant role in who can access and benefit from these spaces.

The undeserved advantages or benefits that some people or groups have because of their social identities, such as race, socioeconomic status, or physical ability are what I consider privilege. This concept highlights the structural injustices that affect who has access to opportunities and experiences, going well beyond personal accountability. When it comes to therapeutic landscapes, privilege influences not just who can benefit from nature-based healing but also how these spaces are created and utilised.

Access is one of the main ways privilege manifests itself in therapeutic settings. A large number of therapeutic gardens, in general or outdoor areas in hospital settings are situated in locations that are expensive, time-consuming, and need transportation. Accessing these areas would seem obvious to someone with a car, a reliable source of money, and free time. However, even getting to these locations can be a major obstacle for someone with little money or no dependable means of transportation. There is an imbalance in who can benefit from nature's healing power as a result of this exclusion.

While working on my thesis, I thought about these ideas and realised that creating healing spaces that are beautiful isn't enough; it's also important to acknowledge and address the privilege that comes with who gets to use these spaces. One of the main conclusions I drew from my research is that inclusive design should be incorporated into therapeutic landscapes. This could entail providing free or inexpensive programs, making sure that accessibility is guaranteed through universal design principles, and taking into account cultural and spiritual customs that might affect how people perceive nature.

Being a landscape architect student, the lessons I've learnt about privilege will inform my work in creating these areas. I've learnt to incorporate accessibility into my designs and to think critically about it. In order to help create surroundings that support health and well-being for everyone, regardless of background or resources, I wish to recognise and address the role privilege plays in determining who gets to experience therapeutic landscapes. After all, everyone should have access to nature's healing power. 🌱✨

[ed-envs3000-w25]

Privilege in Nature Interpretation

I would like to start this blog post off with a reflection question for all of the lovely people who are reading this right now. Name three things that you take for granted. I’ll go first! 

I am so privileged to be able to afford and receive a post-secondary education. 

I am so privileged to have no extreme health conditions, and am able to live a happy and healthy life thanks to our access to healthcare. 

I am so privileged to be able to live in a safe community where there is no threat of violence. 

Privilege is one beauty in life where those who have it, do not tend to appreciate it until its absence. We all forget how fortunate we are to be able to walk on two feet until we trip and break an ankle, and have to spend hours in the emergency room. A privilege is an advantage and ability granted to select individuals, frequently due to their social position in society. 

In the context of nature interpretation, the role played by privilege is seen in the voices who are prioritized when narrating the stories and knowledge associated with the environment being interpreted. Privilege also determines the extent to which cultural values are understood and integrated into the information being conveyed. Land acknowledgements at the beginning of interpretations act as the “precautionary principle”, and tend to be the most effort put into recognizing minoritized Indigenous voices; making European perspectives the dominant source of information. People would rather simply mention that they are aware they are on the land of Indigenous peoples, rather than actually considering why they are acknowledging these voices. It is a privilege to be able to amplify Indigenous voices, and spread their knowledge to those who are interested in the form of nature interpretation. 

It is imperative to also bear in mind the ways and methods in which these conservational parks and areas came to be. The analogy of the invisible backpack is highly prevalent in the conversation of who’s tellings are prioritized in nature interpretation settings. Perspectives regarding how the parks became to be vary based on the individual interviewed. While it may be land untouched by industrialization and construction to the euro-centric eye, it may have once been a home to which Indigenous peoples were banished from. The continents of the euro-centric perspective’s invisible backpack leads to the perception of a beautiful environment, in which they spread the value of nature to those who choose to come and observe. On the contrary, Indigenous peoples and their knowledge and teachings are considered as a secondary source of information; despite this land being theirs to begin with. 

All in all, I believe that those who have privilege should amplify the voices of those who don’t. Colonialism and European ideas have played a major role in the destruction and erasure of Indigenous peoples (and to be honest, any minoritized group to begin with). Value to a subject is provided based on a group’s privilege. In this context, the role played by privilege in nature interpretation is what shapes the amount in which information is emphasized or disregarded by interpreters. 

NOTE: I use the term “minoritized” over “minority” groups in this blog post. This is because “minority” implies merely less of a group in a numeric sense; whereas “minoritized” recognizes that people who are in power – and who have more supplies in their invisible backpacks – force these individuals into a position where they have less privilege and power. 

[ed-envs3000-w25]

Prompt 2: Describe your ideal role of environmental interpreter. What might it entail? Where could it be? What skills might you need? 

An environmental interpreter has a distinct role in society and aims to translate concepts pertaining to the environment to different audiences using an array of different communication methods. Just as a linguistic interpreter might translate English into French for a francophone, an environmental interpreter does the same thing but uses information pertaining to nature. 

Just as mentioned in this week’s content, there are various different types of learners. There are visual, tactile and auditory learners; all of whom understand information using different methodologies. For instance, I am a visual learner who prefers to have information presented in the form of visuals as opposed to text.  

Despite being a visual learner myself, my ideal role as an environmental interpreter would be to ensure I am a teacher who integrates all three learning styles into their teaching methods. More specifically, this means it would be necessary to approach my teaching with the notion that individuals learn differently from one another.  

Ideally, I would need to be adaptable and ready to change teaching styles in an instance. Especially if the engagement I am receiving in response to my teaching is very minimal. This would be an indicator that my target audience is not understanding the concept I am teaching. Engagement is a substantial teller for understanding.  

An example of when I might need to adapt is if I am explaining a complex concept, such as climate change. Due to the complexity of the topic, I might need to communicate the information in an easier-to-digest fashion to ensure that my target audience is engaged. This might entail using different tools and resources.  

I would also need to be succinct and a strong communicator. Being succinct would ensure I do not overcomplicate a concept, while being a strong communicator would ensure that I am able to convey a message without needing to provide too much context.  

When picturing myself as an environmental interpreter, I see myself working at a provincial park or nature reserve within Ontario. I see myself surrounding my target audience in the nature to which we are specifically speaking about. If I were lecturing about the natural escarpment that separates Milton and Guelph, I would ensure I immerse my target audience in a trail-walk experience that provides the most context and information. I would cater to the learning styles of all individuals. For those who are auditory learners, I would lecture along the trail-walk and ensure to include very interesting facts. The use of interesting facts will help the audience to retain information. As for my visual learners, I would ensure I show very specific landmarks that are related to the concepts I am discussing. Doing so will help the audience to make self-to-world connections and will improve the retention of information. For the tactile learners, I would ensure I include lots of exploration. 

Furthermore, I see myself creating specialized sessions that are catered to different audiences. This ensures optimal retention of information. For instance, if the target audience is a group of children, I would discuss less-complex concepts. Whereas if my target audience was a group of undergraduate students, I would provide more scientific explanations of natural phenomena of the environment.   

[ed-envs3000-w25]

Hi! I totally loved reading this because I have a very similar career goal as well! I personally also believe it's very valuable to actually teach and emphasize the importance of topics like these to children while they are still young, especially because our interpretations will allow for them to build their own, based on their experiences as well. As future educators, it is our duty to allow for children to understand the importance of the natural world which surrounds us, especially in the day and age of climate change as well. It is such a rewarding concept to be the foundation of someone’s knowledge; being the baseline for what these children interpret the environment to be feels is a greatly honourable position. I love your idea of creating remote courses as well, for people to access from a broad range of locations! My approach was more hands-on, in order to allow for some sort of separation from technology (especially considering how technology negatively affects the environment as well). I think it's so heartwarming that you want to follow after your mom's footsteps as well. You seem to have a pure passion for educating others. I wish you all the success! Great work :)

Interpretive Blog #2: Embracing Environmental Education: A Passionate Journey Toward Teaching and Sustainability

After much consideration of the variety of different environmental interpreter job opportunities to select from, I would choose to become an environmental educator. Since the young age of four years old, I have looked up to my mother and dreamed of filling her shoes of being an elementary school teacher, which is why I believe that being an educator of the environment would be a very interesting and providing opportunity. This job would entail a variety of smaller jobs and tasks within itself. Some may include formulating and delivering a wide variety of different educational programs, classes and outdoor learning opportunities surrounding the topic of nature and sustainability to large groups of students either in schools, summer camps, or community groups. I would aim to create videos and online content for the public to access if they are not able to physically attend but still wish to learn more about the natural world, and to offer training courses for those hoping to also become an environmental educator.

Last summer at my cottage. People who chose to do the online courses I would offer could learn from the comfort of a location including their cottage!

This job would provide me with the opportunity to educate others which I have always wanted to do at the same time as spending ample time focusing and taking care of nature- one of my favourite “locations”. This could take place at an outdoor education centre, community centre, or in school classrooms, depending on the members who have signed up. I can vividly remember our class visiting for class trips growing up, whether it was ziplining, tapping trees for sap, learning about how to make maple syrup, learning about different types of leaves and plants, but more importantly, steps we can take to save our planet and make it a more environmentally friendly place, cutting back on the harsh emissions that are speeding up global warming and climate change. A variety of skills would be required in order to thrive in this position. Some include excellent communication skills, a high level of knowledge about the environment or maybe even environmental science, initiative to create and present these classes, responsibility and organization to keep dates, names, topics and information orderly, creativity to cultivate and brainstorm the learning materials, problem-solving skills, teamwork or collaboration, and most importantly, a strong passion for the environment itself. It is crucial to ensure you select a profession that you are passionate about and enjoy doing as if you do not, it will make for a long lifetime of doing a job you despise and speaking from experience, it is harder to learn from someone who is not passionate and caring about the information they are teaching, as they do not truly care about what they are providing. I use my mother as an example every time- a school teacher who loves her job is passionate about it and has never complained. She finds ways to look forward to working by making her job interesting and fun for herself. She has a love for children and helping others as do I, which is why I hope to only be a portion of my mother when I am older. Since I am passionate about the environment and teaching others, I feel that being an environmental educator would be a profession I would thrive in. In this week’s unit, we learned about the different types of learners- auditory, visual, and tactile. I believe the environment and being within nature, where these courses would be offered, provides an opportunity for all kinds of learners. Auditory learners can listen to the breeze, the crunch of the leaves, and the sound of birds chirping. Visual learners could see all that nature has to offer while also following instructions that instructors would be offering, and lastly- tactile learners could learn by doing the activities themselves and seeing and experiencing all that is being done. We learned of the importance of considering who we are as an interpreter, who our audience is, and how we can make these experiences meaningful for all involved. While preparing the content for these courses, I would take all of these important factors into consideration.

My walk back home to my student house in Guelph, ON