epistemotropical

[epistemotropical]

Understanding God

Think of a large piece of fabric that is, or seems, endless.. it is then cut and formed into various individual pieces of clothing.. One piece is cut and formed into a t-shirt, another into a pair of pants, another into a sundress.

They all come from the same piece of fabric but they take on the shape and form of a seemingly separate object to experience existence as thag object. That is how God is. The artist that is not separate from Its art. God is the fabric and we are the pieces of cloth formed from it.

[epistemotropical]

Confession:

Back in January this woman I met at a yoga class invited me over for tea. Very nice of her, but as luck would have it I ended up having to stay the night because of a severe snowstorm.

This self-proclaimed anti-feminist proceeds to tell me her whole life story. About how she is secretly in love with some moid she knew when she was 17 and that she still stalks online (she is now 43), that she does not actually love her husband but she knows he will never leave her so she keeps him around, that she feels sorry for me not having a man, and that she travelled to Ireland to cheat on her husband by partaking in BDSM with 3 Pakistani moids she met through facebook…then she casually divulged that she and her husband were forced to leave some weird commune because they were «falsely accused of taking advantage of some 15yr old girl».

Why she chose to tell me all this I may never know. I did not sleep that night, as her initially soft-spoken moid was berating her loudly all night. Not that I would ever dare let my guard down in their presence ofc.

What being terminally obsessed with dick will do to a mf I assume

Holy shit.

[epistemotropical]

Typical book from avard-winning female author who is popular on booktok:

( Screenshot from: https://youtu.be/kVCdQ3rulAo?si=FViQJQU4wpgrxdMp )

Males at least honestly acknowledge their pervert nature, women try to sugarcoat it with fancy words like "dark romance", "kink" and "muh fiction doesn't affect reality". No, it does! Authors and their creations don't exist in vacuum or in another dimension, they are influenced by real world and vise versa (fiction affects reality, social norms, people...).

Women are no less than men responsible for patriarchy, maybe even more, since they are the ones who still choose to serve men even in first world countries, where women have more rights and possibilities. But they still want to be brainwashed submissive whores who are aroused by possibility of being abused and killed. Sad and pathetic

[epistemotropical]

I think every lesbian who says she wouldn't date a bi woman is functionally on the same wavelength as men who say they would only marry a virgin

[epistemotropical]

being completely removed from the heterosexual world and politics is always so entertaining. sabrina carpenter is doing the exact same thing women have always done and will very probably always do. that has nothing to do with me whatsover.

[epistemotropical]

On lust being the root of all evil

I dare anybody to find a single horrific crime that is not tied to LUST. I am dead serious. ANYTIME there is a crime, it is ALWAYS related (directly or indirectly) to lust. It is crazy. Whether someone got raped, killed her/his partner over jealousy, sexual assault... Lust is always at the root of these crimes. Lust makes you become hateful, paranoid, unclean, addicted and EVIL. Totally and utterly evil. Addiction to orgasm / sex (they are interchangeable) will soon turn you into a slaughtering beast. Period. People say that 'The love of money is the root of all evil' but that is NOT the whole truth. Most wealthy people are men. Why would men want lots of money ? Because they want women to be at their feet. And why do they want women to chase them ? Because they want to have sex with these women. So yeah, lust is always the culprit.

The endless chase after an orgasm will lead you to fall into deeper and darker ways of achieving it, that is HOW you become depraved and evil. 'Regular' people who think that they are not like these 'monsters' of rapists, pedophiles, murderers, abusers etc are only a few orgasms away from turning into of one them. You will soon be part of the club. People want to reassure themselves by saying that these offenders are 'born this way' but the truth is that anybody can BECOME one. ANYBODY. Keep masturbating and orgasming, and you will see how you end up in 10 years.

One of the examples which shocked me most was Irma Grese :

'Grese, described by one Auschwitz prisoner as 'the most depraved, cruel, imaginative pervert I ever came across', committed a vast array of atrocities. Grese would also incessantly watch unmedicated operations with such intensity that saliva dripped 'from the corner of her mouth.'

The Hyena also had a penchant for depraved, sexual violence, and seemingly chose partners who were as twisted as she was. It wasn't just the act of committing violence that got her off. Grese was said to have derived near-sexual pleasure from watching prisoners in agony. Her tense body swung back and forth in a revealing, rhythmical motion. Her cheeks were flushed and her wide-open eyes had the rigid, staring look of complete sexual paroxysm. She also took satisfaction in forcing both male and female prisoners into having sex with her. Beyond her sexual degeneracy, and her affinity for violence, she was more than happy to carry out standard methods of torture for Nazis. She beat others to death and had 'orgasmic spasms' while watching gruesome operations.'

Every degeneracy is tied to the orgasm. EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM. There is no exception. Chasing orgasms will turn you into a fucking monster. I am not exaggerating :

'Lust murder is a subcategory of sexual homicide in which perpetrators sadistically and brutally murders their victims to achieve ultimate sexual satisfaction. They typically repeat their killings, thus constituting serial murder. It is also referred to as erotophonophilia, one of the most extreme forms of paraphilia. There are a number of essential elements to paraphilic behaviors, including fantasy, compulsive masturbation, and facilitating agents such as alcohol, drugs, and pornography. The fantasy system of the individual is a vital component in facilitating paraphilic behaviors and becomes increasingly violent over time.'

In 'Sex, the key to the Bible' by Sidney Calhoun, the author explains that :

'The condition of thought which produces war, produces lust. The same state of mind that makes men want to fight and murder, causes them to want to cohabit with women. Purity brings peace of mind and peace of soul. Lust produces war within the mind, murder and death within thought and action. It is the serpent working out its own destruction. The oppression is within the sex thought. (The orrgasm) promises something in the way of pleasure and gives pain and death, in return. When we shall become so pure in mind, that we shall have no desire to gratify the love of the flesh through the sex act, we shall be free from self destruction.'

That is precisely why sexual people who desperately want to romanticize sex by talking about 'tantric sex', 'making love', 'passionate act', 'sex magic' etc creep me the FUCK out. Since I know the truth about sex / orgasm, I genuinely believe these people are murderers in the making. And that is also why I firmly believe that women are way creepier than men : men talk crudely about sex so, in a way, they are not trying to romanticize it nor sugarcoat it. They are describing it as it is : a tool of domination, degradation, humiliation, torture, pain and death. But women ? They will try to make it sound like it is the most loving act on the face of this Earth. They LOVE sex but, on the other hand, they FEAR all the consequences of sex and lust (assault, sexual harassment, STDs, unwanted pregnancies, creepy males, IA deepfakes, revenge porn, crude jokes, objectification)... Just females being irrational, prioritizing their feelings and ignoring cause and effect per usual...

Just like Solanas described :

'Sex is the refuge of the mindless. And the more simple-minded a woman is— the deeper she’s sunk into ‘male culture’—the more charming she is, and the more drawn to sex she becomes. In our society, charming women have fire in their pants. But because they are devastatingly charming, they don’t demean themselves by fucking—they make love, they communicate with their bodies, they establish sensual contact. The more literary ones waltz to the rhythm of Eros and take in the entire Universe; the mystics dissolve into the erotic Principle and merge with the Cosmos, and the ones on acid vibrate'.

Sex and orgasms are really truly disguting. I used to watch a gay male on Youtube talk about his sexual experiences and he said that he had developped tons of kinks and eventually grew bored of ALL of them. He was a feet fetishist, then turned into oral, then grew interested in fantasy-play, then wanted to try scatophilia, then encountered a guy whose fetish was to 'behave like a baby' (undercover pedophilia...). Like ??? And he was proud of his lifestyle ??? Like how is this even possible ??? How can you be called 'sane' when living that kind of life ? That shit is deeply disturbing and should not be normalized.

Having a sexual mind will make you turn into a dumbass submissive hoe with no self respect or self-preservation instincts. We see it with women all around us. It will make a female lose her mind and post shit like this for everyone to see (since shame has been thrown out of the window because of the normalization of lust and depravity) :

We are truly living among monsters. Monsters trying to appear 'normal', 'virtuous' and 'living according to nature'. We are in motherfucking Hell.

[epistemotropical]

“Sabrina Carpenter’s album cover is degrading and dangerous.”

This is slut shaming. You’re all so shamelessly sex negative that when you see a straight person having sex and talking about it you shit your collective jorts in rage.

No matter what, what is happening here is that a woman is expressing her sexuality and OTHER WOMEN are saying she’s “wAlKiNg BaCk FeMiNiSm” because of it. Jesus fucking Christ we’re so cooked. Jesus fucking Christ.

[epistemotropical]

If sex is beautiful romantic "love-making" why human brain has to shut off disgust to participate in it?

And this is relatively small expirement with roughly 100 participants. Unfortunately, in age of obsession with sex and relationships studies like this aren't popular

[epistemotropical]

weve invented this new form of satire where you behave exactly as society expects from you. whats the commentary you ask? and how does it improve anyones lives? uhh um well

[epistemotropical]

Blackpilled women truly demonstrate that women are keyholders and the ones who have the power of choice. This world does not stop us from making the best choices as women. We choose freedom, and many women refuse to be free because they want men over their own best interests.

Not to be a drama queen here but I think this black pill thing is a nihilist psyop trying to convince feminists to give up and be complacent, but in the lazy resentful liberal way. You know, like Marxist guys who don’t tip because they don’t believe in the tipping system.

Who cares if you can’t save every woman? Who cares if the fight is longer than your lifetime? Who cares if the odds feel unsurmountable? That’s just how hard the fight is, not a barometer of its worth.

I don’t change the world, but in my work and my personal life I have definitely changed it for some women. Imagine the ripple effect if we all do that.

Selfish and kinda childish behavior to think you have to be the savior for a movement to matter tbh

[epistemotropical]

tumblr should show you how much % of the website you have blocked, I would really like to know

I been going on murder sprees since ever I figured out that it‘s not necessary to go directly on someone‘s profile to block them, you can just do it over the three dots next to their annoying reblog/commentI LOVE MY ECHO CHAMBER!!!❤️❤️❤️

[epistemotropical]

i believe the “decenter men” mantra is well-meaning, but ultimately a political error rooted in identitarianism. people take it to mean that lesbians, for example, can’t be invested in gender hierarchy when we know this is not true. some of the first assessments of BDSM were written by lesbians who analyzed the acceptance of kink culture among lesbians and other queers, where it primarily originated. it leads to the false notion that a man must physically be present for gender hierarchy to be physically or socially enforced. you can look at yaoi fangirls to see that this is not true, as i’ve written at length about, no shade to my siblings over there (a little!). this is obviously extremely woke, but the more useful term would be something like “combat heterosexual ideology.” no one is off the hook for that, no matter who is present or absent, but it is way more provocative and maybe a little cringier than saying “decenter men” lol. but at times the cringe must be embraced if the truth lies within…🤫

[epistemotropical]

We are not losing any intelligent women to femininity or tradwife propaganda, and im tired of pretending that the women who fall for it had any potential to begin with.... I don't think there's a woman out there with 2 braincells who drops everything because she thinks a man will take care of her. She was never gonna make it ANYWHERE. She was never gonna finish a degree , or keep a job and she cant hustle. She's simply not that girl.

[epistemotropical]

love between men and women is not possible bc men dont care to actually know women, and women cant accept men for who they really are and must conjure up delusions in order to "love" them

[epistemotropical]

I used to think communication was a key until i realized comprehension is. You can communicate all you want with someone but if they don’t understand you or refuse to understand, communication is useless

[epistemotropical]

i've met some intelligent males, the types who correctly identify that sex and sexuality are not signs of love, but tools of humiliation and oppression, admit to it, and refuse to do it. that's part of why i am not falling for the idea that females are kind and loving whereas males are destructive and opportunistic. the overlap is significant and, in fact, the biggest difference between the sexes, outside of roles in reproduction, is that females have less opportunity to act on their selfishness and cruelty as a group.

and that's all there is to it. really, i mean it. ever been confused by female behaviors? by male behaviors? humans are humans, if you truly understand one, you understand the other.

[epistemotropical]