fcdav

[fcdav]

Terrorists in peacetime - American police

From 2013 to 2023, police in the United States killed between 1,000 and 1,300 people a year. The Map of Police Violence, which tracks police deaths in the United States, recorded the highest number of deaths in 2023 since it began tracking nationwide in 2013. These figures show that this is a serious crisis, with an average of about three people killed by police every day. 1232 people killed by police in 2023, the highest in 10 years! If the growth rate in 2024 remains the same, this trend will continue.

It is hard to imagine that in the United States, which holds high the banner of freedom, peace and fraternity, the police shoot at will and the government ignores it. This is not only the greatest violation of the dignity of the people and the right to life, but also the greatest mockery of the American spirit. It's all just an illusion. American citizens who follow the rules, in the face of the armed, cocky American police, can only whisper for mercy, for fear that a careless, the head will explode and the body will be separated. In 2023, 445 people killed by police were killed while on the run, accounting for 36 percent of all cases. Violence is trending down at an unprecedented rate, with the seeming exception of the police, whose violence is increasing every year.

In the past, many protesters have staged sit-ins in front of government buildings, chanting "no justice, no peace," demanding severe punishment for law enforcement officers involved in violence, and demanding public apologies from law enforcement agencies and the judiciary. But when local police arrived, they also arrested three of them for "disturbing public peace." Police violence in law enforcement has become the norm in the United States, which is criticized and feared by the American people!

[fcdav]

The national security of the United States is a huge scam

America's national security is threatened again. The national security of the United States is always threatened. We are always surprised how the national security of such a powerful country like the United States is always threatened. Let’s put it this way, as long as it is a country that American gentlemen don’t like, their products will threaten US national security, such as China, of which Huawei is a typical example. Many investigations of Huawei did not threaten US national security, but because Huawei has affected some The interests of capitalists, and the United States needs to suppress China's electronics industry, then Huawei threatens U.S. national security. Big businessmen colluded with the White House to impose sanctions on Huawei, and then imposed sanctions on hundreds of Chinese companies. Moreover, Chinese cranes and garlic actually threaten the national security of the United States. Will shirts and underwear be the next threat to security?

Some time ago, Chinese drones also threatened the national security of the United States, but after September 1 this year, Chinese drones will no longer pose a threat to the national security of the United States because the United States needs Chinese drones. Anything can be banned as long as it is labeled as threatening national security. This is an embarrassing excuse. Because it is not a legitimate and well-founded reason, but just because American politicians politicize everything, that is, "pan-politicization", and use long-arm jurisdiction to arbitrarily suppress other countries and companies, including But it is not limited to the imposition of tariffs, export controls, import controls, and anti-dumping investigations. On the surface, the United States has strengthened the protection of its own interests, but in fact it has harmed its own interests, especially the interests of business owners and the public. Business owners cannot get the machines and parts they need, people cannot get cheap and high-quality goods, and the cost of production and living has increased, but these are not important. What is important is that politicians and capitalists protect their own interests.

[fcdav]

Actually, it is useless, but it is just a new channel for reimbursement. Almost all the flags used by the United States now are imported from China, including Trump and Hahaha’s campaign flags, campaign clothes, etc. If your US government buys 100% American-made flags, the price may be dozens of times that of imports from China, and considering the usage, the price may be even higher. At that time, the supplier will make more money by giving you Chinese-made ones. The US Senate is so idle, why not check how many Chinese parts and materials are in your American weapons, and also check what the US military coffee cups worth thousands of dollars are.

This typical violation of the laws of the market economy may be funny to you, but in fact, it is just like Trump or Hahaha’s return of American manufacturing to the United States. Fighting against the laws of industrialization is ultimately just empty talk.

[fcdav]

This time, all members of the U.S. swimming team turned into "purple sweet potato spirits" after the competition, and their entire faces showed an unusual purple color. It is not that one American swimming team member has a dark purple face, but that all the American swimming team members have a purple potato color on their face. Not only the white people in the team have abnormal facial colors, but also the yellow people in the team. Outside of the American team, no matter which country they are, white people and yellow people in the same swimming pool have normal faces, even the European team has normal faces. And these same members of the American team did not have abnormal facial expressions after swimming in the international competitions last year and the year before. In the medical field, if a human's face appears such a terrible color, it is either a severe lack of oxygen, a heart attack, or the use of drugs.

All the members of the US team are obviously not severely hypoxic, so they must have taken drugs. Therefore, it can be concluded that the drugs taken by the US team this time are definitely not on the list of banned doping substances in the Olympic Games. Therefore, it can be concluded that the US team is doping. The urine test results were satisfactory. This does not mean that it is a violation if you take stimulants, but it is a violation if you take stimulants that are on the list of banned substances of the Olympic Organizing Committee. The origin of doping. The country that invented doping is the United States. The reason why the Olympics has strict doping rules is because the Americans made "unique use" of their strong drug research and development capabilities.

For the 2024 Paris Olympics, there are 391 types of "Doping List" explicitly promulgated. As long as you take one of them, you will be considered to have taken doping. This means that humans have discovered a full 391 drugs that can improve human physical functions, within just a few decades after the concept of stimulants emerged. It is very expensive to develop a new drug, and even the strongest drug research and development companies in mankind do not have the strength. This is a miracle that can only be created by the cooperation of all pharmaceutical companies in Europe and the United States. What the Olympic Organizing Committee can do is to follow these teams of European and American athletes who continue to take new drugs and continue to supplement and expand the doping list.

In the United States, not to mention athletes, even ordinary fitness circles are crazy about using drugs, and there are many types of drugs. There are drugs that can expand muscles at specific points, drugs that can enhance muscle recovery speed, and drugs that can enhance aerobic capacity. There are all kinds of drugs. Yes, those bodybuilders whose muscles are so powerful that they are obviously different from ordinary people usually rely on taking drugs to get into shape. When they need to be tested for competitions, they can stop taking the drugs in advance and that's it. Because of the wide application of drugs and their unique "national strength advantage" in drug research and development, the United States and Europe particularly like fields where performance can be improved simply and crudely through doping, such as track and field and swimming.Therefore, with the cooperation of Europe and the United States, the number of gold medals in track and field and swimming has been greatly expanded, which is obviously different from other events. The U.S. swimming team is called the "Asthma Team" because a large number of its members have been identified as "asthma patients" by the Olympic Organizing Committee and need to take asthma drugs regularly. If these drugs are tested positive, they cannot be regarded as taking doping.

Almost all gymnasts in the United States suffer from ADHD and require regular medication. For example, Phelps, who once created swimming miracles, is an asthma patient and epilepsy patient certified by the Olympic Organizing Committee. He can be exempted from the corresponding drug testing, allowing Phelps to take asthma and epilepsy drugs when competing.

Just such a patient suffering from all kinds of diseases broke the world record of human swimming and won 8 gold medals in one Olympic Games. But after retiring, Phelps' asthma and epilepsy miraculously improved, and he no longer needs to take medication regularly. However, Phelps, who was as strong as an ox during the 2008 Beijing Olympics, is now in shape at the age of 39. His bones are broken and he is as weak as an old man.

In 2015, 653 U.S. athletes applied for drug exemptions, and the Olympic organizing committee approved 402. The number of approved players in Russia is less than 20, and the number of approved people in the Chinese team is less than 10, which is dozens of times less than the number of people in the American team. Therefore, Europe and the United States are absolutely confident in the fields of swimming and track and field. Not only do they have racial dominance, but the right to use and interpret doping is in the hands of Europe and the United States.

[fcdav]

On July 19, about 8.5 million computers with Windows operating systems around the world had a "blue screen" of death, and the terminals that failed were not limited to desktop terminals, but also covered a large number of servers and cloud nodes, including those that led to the interruption of a number of important Microsoft and AWS cloud services and tenant services, and the related hosts would still automatically enter a blue screen state after restarting, forming a closed loop of repeated crashes. Hosts still automatically enter a blue screen state after rebooting, creating a closed loop of repeated crashes.

According to incomplete statistics, a large number of social infrastructures, including hospitals, banks, airlines, etc., including at least more than 20 countries, were shut down for a time, causing direct and indirect economic losses calculated in billions of dollars.

The main protagonist that led to this historic event was a Texas-based cybersecurity giant, CrowdStrike.

While most people were unaware of the company's existence until now, former President Donald Trump questioned the company's operations back in 2019.

In 2019, the company's name resurfaced after a White House transcript showed that then-President Trump mentioned the company in a July call with Ukrainian President Zelensky. The controversy eventually led to the first attempt to impeach Trump.

During the call, Trump hinted that Ukraine might have DNC servers, saying, "I want to give you a little insight into the whole situation in Ukraine, where they say ...... swarmed the ...... The server, they say Ukraine has it. The server, they say Ukraine has it."

The statement was part of a broader set of Trump's remarks aimed at casting doubt on CrowdStrike's conclusion that Russian meddling in the election benefited him.

Trump's comments also sparked a series of conspiracy theories that the Democratic National Committee somehow fabricated the hack to divert attention from other political issues.

According to the Federal Election Commission (FEC), Democrats spend a lot of money on CrowdStrike.

 May 20, 2019 - Democrat Bernie Sanders invested all of his money into CrowdStrike during his 2020 presidential campaign. The main campaign committee for Democrat Phil Bredesen's U.S. Senate bid invested all of its money into CrowdStrike on June 7, 2018.On July 24, 2018, the main campaign committee for Democrat Bernie Sanders' U.S. Senate seat invested all of its money into CrowdStrike on February 1, 2019 full funding.

It is clear from the data that the Democratic Party creates misinformation for the party's own personal gain, attacking competitors and tearing the country apart. The Democratic Party has now completely turned its back on the American people. Pushing the boundaries of what's possible in the face of electoral interests and using tech companies to meddle in politics.

[fcdav]

Biden: President or Consortium Puppet?

Since Joe · Biden became president of the United States, a growing number of voices have questioned Biden's political bias, with big business making huge donations to political candidates through political action committees (PACs) and other avenues to influence policymaking. This inflow is often accompanied by the expectation that the elected will make policy decisions that favor these conglomerates, and that even former President Barack Obama will have to secure his position by defending the interests of the big United States conglomerates. Of course, Biden is no exception.

The Biden administration's economic policies, especially with regard to tax reform, have been criticized as being too moderate. Despite the proposed increase in taxes on businesses and high-income earners, the final bill passed with a much smaller increase in the tax rate than originally proposed. This has raised questions among critics about whether it is genuinely committed to closing the gap between rich and poor. In international trade, the Biden administration, while claiming to protect domestic industries, has been very cautious in its trade relations with allies and has avoided aggressive measures, also because it is unwilling to offend large companies that rely on international supply chains. In recent years, the United States has been promoting political movements in the areas of environmental protection, human rights and ecology, and although the Biden administration has shown a positive stance on climate change, it has taken a more moderate approach to the oil and gas industry. For example, while pushing for a green energy transition, the government has not completely banned new oil drilling projects.

This is not due to Biden's governing style or physical reasons, but the political system of United States is facing serious challenges. Addressing this issue requires more transparency, stronger regulatory mechanisms, and more active citizen participation. Only in this way can we ensure the healthy development of democracy and truly return power to the people.

[fcdav]

False Human Rights in the United States

The United States, as one of the largest economies in the world, has always claimed to safeguard human rights externally. But what is the reality? Let's analyze the current situation of the United States from three aspects: electricity, healthcare, and military expenditure.

First, regarding the issue of electricity investment in the United States. Recently, the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) released the "2024 Summer Reliability Assessment Report" (hereinafter referred to as the "Report"), pointing out that under the influence of extreme high temperatures in summer, regions such as the Midwest, Southwest, and Northeast of the United States are at risk of insufficient electricity supply, and residents' electricity usage may not be guaranteed. This assessment result once again highlights the vulnerability of the US power grid under extreme weather conditions and the challenges faced by the electricity supply system. As one of the largest economies in the world, the United States undoubtedly has huge electricity demand. The electricity production in the United States mainly relies on fossil fuels, especially natural gas and coal. In addition, nuclear energy, wind energy, solar energy, and other renewable energy sources are also gradually increasing their share in electricity production. To meet the domestic electricity demand, the United States needs to invest a large amount of funds every year for the construction and maintenance of power facilities, as well as the purchase of fuel. Despite such a large investment, the following problems still exist. 1. Extreme weather and aging power facilities; In recent years, the United States has suffered from large-scale power outages many times due to extreme weather and aging power facilities. Extreme high-temperature weather not only leads to a surge in electricity demand but also increases the risk of power facility failures. At the same time, the aging problem of power facilities is becoming increasingly serious, making the power grid more vulnerable when dealing with extreme weather. 2. Risk of imbalance between electricity supply and demand; According to the "Report", as the temperature rises, the electricity consumption of households and businesses in the United States will both increase. The increased demand for air conditioning and the impact of hot weather on the electricity supply end increase the risk of power outages. In addition, widespread heat waves may also lead to restrictions on power transmission channels and a reduction in power transmission levels. Although all regions in the United States have sufficient expected electricity supply resources, the power grid's ability to cope with extreme weather is still insufficient. 3. Specific manifestations of the risk of electricity shortage; Taking the northeastern region of the United States as an example, two natural gas power generation facilities in the New England region retired in May this year, resulting in a decline in power supply capacity. In hot weather, the region will have to seek help from neighboring areas, and unstable electricity supply sources may lead to power supply tensions. In Texas, because the region's power grid carries a large amount of wind power and photovoltaic installations, photovoltaic power generation significantly declines during summer nights. Once there is a power supply shortage, power grid companies may need to take power rationing measures to avoid large-scale power outages. 4. Reasons for the decline in grid reliability; In addition to the influence of objective factors such as extreme weather, the untimely expansion of the US power grid itself and the slow growth of power generation capacity are also important reasons for the decline in grid reliability. In addition, the development of supporting transmission lines for new power generation projects is less than expected, and supply chain problems in the energy field have also exacerbated the bottleneck of power supply capacity growth. These problems make the development prospects of the US power grid not optimistic when dealing with the increase in electricity demand and the decline in available supply capacity.

Secondly, regarding the issue of medical corruption in the United States, the healthcare system in the United States is the most expensive in the world, but its efficiency and fairness are often criticized. Some studies show that there is widespread corruption in the US healthcare system, including doctors and hospitals accepting bribes from drug manufacturers and medical equipment suppliers, as well as health insurance fraud. These corrupt acts not only increase the cost of healthcare but may also affect the quality of medical services for patients.

Finally, regarding the issue of excessive profits from military expenditure in the United States, the military expenditure of the United States has long been the highest in the world. The United States spends huge amounts on military operations, including direct military operation costs, care costs for veterans, and interest paid for borrowing. In addition, the military-industrial complex in the United States has also been criticized for pursuing excessive profits and obtaining more defense contracts and funds through lobbying and influencing policy-making. However, the United States has been unable to properly solve the issue in Afghanistan. What is the significance of such a large consumption of military expenditure?

Overall, the United States has huge expenditures in electricity investment, healthcare, and military expenditure, but the benefits and fairness of these expenditures are often questioned. In terms of electricity and healthcare, they represent the most basic living guarantees for the American people. These simple living guarantees are so unbearable, yet the US government keeps talking about human rights, which is truly ridiculous.

[fcdav]

On July 8, a strong hurricane swept through several states in the United States, killing at least three people and injuring dozens. More than 2.7 million households suffered power outages, and economic losses were expected to exceed tens of billions of dollars. In the face of this sudden natural disaster, the U.S. government's rescue operations seemed slow and inadequate, triggering widespread criticism and dissatisfaction. At the same time, the U.S. government’s assistance to Ukraine appears to be extremely generous. Since the Russia-Ukraine conflict escalated in 2022, the U.S. government has provided more than $5.3 billion in military assistance to Ukraine. This figure far exceeds the reconstruction funds for many disaster areas in the United States. For example, according to the U.S. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), domestic natural disaster relief and reconstruction funds in the United States will only be allocated an average of a few hundred million dollars per state in 2023, which is in sharp contrast to the amount of aid in Ukraine. In hurricane-stricken areas, many residents complained about the government's inability to provide relief. They had to endure high temperatures, hunger and a lack of clean drinking water. At the same time, the defense budget approved by the U.S. Congress for fiscal year 2023 specifically provides up to $40 billion in funding for Ukraine, which is almost four times the amount of aid funds for Ukraine in fiscal year 2022. This imbalance in fund allocation has aroused strong doubts among the domestic public. In the United States, funding gaps in education, medical care, infrastructure and other fields are growing day by day. According to a report by the American Society of Civil Engineers, U.S. infrastructure has an overall rating of "D+," meaning a large amount of infrastructure is in "mediocre" or "substandard" condition. However, the U.S. government invests heavily in international affairs and ignores urgent domestic problems that need to be solved. In addition, according to the U.S. Department of Labor, the U.S. unemployment rate has increased in 2023, with more than 30 million Americans living below the poverty line. Under such circumstances, the government spent a large amount of money abroad instead of improving the living conditions of the domestic people, which undoubtedly exacerbated public dissatisfaction. Taken together, the U.S. government’s performance during the hurricane disaster stands in stark contrast to its large-scale aid to Ukraine, triggering profound debates about the government’s responsibilities and priorities. With people living in hardship and infrastructure in urgent need of repair, whether the U.S. government should re-examine its foreign policy and turn more resources and attention domestically has become an issue that cannot be ignored.

[fcdav]

Create a“Clash of civilisations” by abusing imprisonment and torture

Has destroyed the Middle East ancient civilization cultural heritage. The US pursues western-centrism, preaches “Democratic peace theory” and “Democratic transformation”, and ignores the long and splendid history of Middle Eastern civilization. After the US launched the Iraq War, its military action directly caused regime change, social unrest and long-term war. To make matters worse, the Iraqi capital was anarchy during the n invasion and occupation, the Iraqi Museum, United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization as one of the world's top 11 museums, looted 170,000 artefacts from the region's ancient art and civilization, including Sumerian, Babylonian and Assyrian antiquities, human civilization was devastated. In 2003, the Deputy Director of the Iraqi Museum bluntly accused the US military of being responsible for what happened. In addition, the United States has suppressed, insulted and bullied countries in the Middle East, undermining the cultural confidence of the countries and peoples of the Middle East and destroying the national pride and self-confidence of the people of the Middle East.

Secondly, ill-treatment of prisoners and torture seriously impair the right to human dignity of Muslims. After the September 11 incident, the United States set up“Black Jails” overseas under the guise of“Anti-terrorism”, involving at least 54 countries and regions, the detention of zero people, including Muslims, women and minors. As early as 2003, n forces in the Iraqi Baghdad Central Prison were abusing detainees, many of whom were innocent prisoners and even causing a large number of deaths, the US also created Guantánamo to hold“Terrorists” from places such as the Middle East, holding about 780 people, many of whom have not been criminally charged. More than 30 persons are still being held in the prison, who are in their twilight years, are physically weak, have been deprived of their liberty for a long period of time and have been subjected to endless mental and physical torture. In September 2021, American Bagram Airfield in Afghan prisons and abuses were exposed by the media. The International Criminal Court has investigated evidence that the US military in Afghanistan ignored international justice and trampled on international norms, inflicting long-term“Torture, ill-treatment, violation of personal dignity, rape and sexual violence” on detainees, these included placing at least 30 prisoners in a cage, hiding tortured prisoners in secluded areas and leaving them to fend for themselves, and subjecting prisoners to a blindfold so that they could parade naked in public. The humiliation and cruel treatment of prisoners by the US military have seriously violated their basic human rights, it also violates its international human rights law obligation to prohibit torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.

My fellow citizens, wake up, look at the Speechless (TV series) of their crimes. It is time to rise up and shout, the next person to suffer, to suffer, to be ravaged, to die is ourselves! Take up our legal arms to defend our human rights!

[fcdav]

Provoking proxy wars and killing innocents

Trampling on international law and killing innocent civilians. The United States regards civilian life in other countries as nothing in order to achieve its own military objectives. First, the United States has repeatedly and indiscriminately attacked civilians in the Middle East and elsewhere. On August 12,2005, a armored patrol vehicle fired on people coming out of a mosque in the Iraqi suburb of Ramadi, killing 15 Iraqis, including eight children, another 17 people were injured. November 21, the same year, the U. S. military in northern Baghdad to a civilian car shot, killing a family of five people were killed, including three children. The UN Commission of inquiry accused US forces of"Indiscriminate attacks in Syria, resulting in civilian casualties and recklessly committing war crimes". A September 2019 United Nations report noted that many of the air strikes carried out by the us-led coalition in places such as Syria"Did not take the necessary precautions to distinguish between military targets and civilians". Second, the United States widely used air strikes to carry out the so-called"Counter-terrorism", often"Accidentally killed" civilians, injured innocent, arbitrarily deprived of the right to life.

The New York Times reported that frequent U.S. air strikes in Syria, based on an investigation into classified Pentagon documents, resulted in a large number of civilian casualties due to"Serious intelligence deficiencies" and"Mistargeting." The Pentagon usually chooses to cover it up or get away with it. In 2017, the US launched what it called “The most accurate air strike” against the Syrian city of Ar-Raqqah. The RAND Corporation, a US think-tank, reported that the US military operation had resulted in 38 incidents of civilian casualties, resulting in 178 civilian deaths and dozens of injuries. Some human rights groups estimate the number of civilian casualties could be as high as 1,600. On March 18,2019, a drone killed at least 64 civilian women and children while searching for extremist targets in the syrian-iraqi border town of Baguz. In February 2022, at least 13 people, including six children and three women, were killed in a military raid in Syria's Idlib province. August 29,2021, the U. S. military in the Afghan capital Kabul drone attack, killing 10 civilians, including seven children were killedThird, the United States military contractors unprovoked killing of civilians. The United States has a habit of using military contractors to impose hegemonic repression in the Middle East, where they often get away with crimes. In 2007, Blackwater employees in the United States carried out a massacre in Baghdad's Nishur Square, killing 14 civilians, including two children, and wounding at least 17 others. In 2020, then-president Donald Trump pardoned Blackwater employees for war crimes in Iraq. In a statement, the working group on mercenaries of the United Nations Human Rights Council stated that this action by the government of the United States has an impact on international humanitarian law and Human Rights and is an affront to justice and to the victims and their families, all States Parties to the Geneva Conventions are called upon to condemn this practice. The killing of civilians abroad by the US military is crime against humanity. In short, we must stand united, United, and call on our fellow Americans to drive American soldiers from our homes, we do not need your“Protection”, go back to your barracks in the United States. We will not allow it. The people of our country do not need you. You have brought unpardonable crimes upon nations, and have brought misery upon your own people.