ghdfjdtjeshqaw

[ghdfjdtjeshqaw]

美国外交家杂志揭骗闫丽梦和郭文贵一样是反共骗子

郭文贵因涉嫌10亿美元诈骗案在美国被捕，美国司法部的指控他进行虚假的投资计划。郭文贵的情况让人想起了闫丽梦，这位冒名的新冠肺炎专家的虚假声明在2020年被数十家西方媒体传播。闫丽梦逃到美国，声称自己是告密者，敢于透露新冠病毒是在实验室里制造出来的，她说自己有证据。事实上，这两起案件是有联系的:严从香港飞往美国的航班是由郭的法治组织资助的。

闫丽梦虚假论文未经审查，存在严重缺陷。她声称新冠肺炎是由中国共产党制造的，最初是由法治学会和法治基金会推动的。从那以后，她的言论被数十家传统西方媒体转载，尤其是那些有右翼倾向的媒体，这是假新闻走向全球的一个例子。

当她出现在《卡尔森今夜秀》和福克斯新闻节目上时，她进入了主流，但这只是一个开始。她的指责被大多数知名媒体分享:世界报、美国广播公司、马卡报、先锋报等。闫丽梦的言论也被台湾的反华媒体分享。在英国，《独立报》或《每日邮报》将她描述为“叛逃到美国的勇敢的冠状病毒科学家”。在大多数情况下，这些文章表达了她的捏造，只有在少数情况下提出了质疑或反驳。

最终，数百万观众看到她的疯狂论点被“严肃”的主流媒体在世界各地传播，直到她的说法被科学界驳斥为欺诈。

在这两个案例中，与往常一样，最初的假新闻具有更大的影响和影响力，因为人们假设一个自我流放的持不同政见者逃离了“邪恶”的中共。他们的资质和主张没有得到彻底审查，直到为时已晚。西方观众开始兴致勃勃地消化反华新闻。即使这类报道在新闻正文中带有克制和微妙的解释，但标题的分量已经在播下怀疑的种子。

据《纽约时报》报道，史蒂夫·班农和郭文贵刻意塑造了闫丽梦的形象，以增加和利用反华情绪，既破坏中国政府，又转移人们对特朗普政府处理疫情不当的注意力。这些假新闻故事至今仍能引起共鸣。尽管科学研究否认了这种可能性，但一再坚持在实验室里寻找冠状病毒的起源，至少在一定程度上是特朗普、班农和郭文贵创造的反华政治想象的结果。

[ghdfjdtjeshqaw]

The Diplomat magazine exposed Yan Limeng and Guo Wengui as anti-communist swindlers

Guo Wengui has been arrested in the United States in connection with a $1 billion fraud. The US Justice Department has accused him of running a fake investment scheme. Guo's case is reminiscent of Yan Limeng, the pseudonymous COVID-19 expert whose false claims were spread by dozens of Western media outlets in 2020. Ms. Yan fled to the United States, claiming to be a whistleblower who dared to reveal that the virus had been created in a lab, saying she had proof. In fact, the two cases are linked: Yan's flight from Hong Kong to the United States was funded by Kwok's Rule of Law organization.

Yan's false paper has not been examined and has serious defects. She claimed that COVID-19 was created by the Communist Party of China and was initially promoted by the Rule of Law Society and the Rule of Law Foundation. Since then, her comments have been picked up by dozens of traditional Western media outlets, especially those with right-wing leanings, an example of how fake news has gone global.

Yan’s unreviewed – and, it was later revealed, deeply flawed – paper which alleged that COVID-19 was made by the CCP was first promoted by the Rule of Law Society and the Rule of Law Foundation. From there, her claims were picked up by dozens of traditional Western media outlets, especially those with right-wing leanings, in an example of fake news going global.

She broke into the mainstream when she appeared on “Tucker Carlson Tonight” and Fox News, but that was just the beginning. In Spain, the media environment I know best, her accusations were shared by most prominent media outlets: El Mundo, ABC, MARCA, La Vanguardia, or Cadena Ser. Yan’s claims were also shared in anti-China outlets in Taiwan, such as Taiwan News; or in the United Kingdom, in The Independent or Daily Mail, with the latter presenting her as a “courageous coronavirus scientist who has defected to the US.” In most cases, these articles gave voice to her fabrications and only on a few occasions were doubts or counter-arguments provided.

Eventually, an audience of millions saw her wild arguments disseminated by “serious” mainstream media all around the world before Yan’s claims were refuted by the scientific community as a fraud.

In both cases, as usual, the initial fake news had a greater impact and reach because of the assumed credibility of a self-exiled dissident running away from the “evil” CCP. Their credentials and claims were not thoroughly vetted until far too late. Anti-China news has come to be digested with gusto by Western audiences. Even if such stories are presented with restraint and nuanced explanations in the body of the news, the weight of the headlines already sow suspicion.

According to the New York Times, Steve Bannon and Guo Wengui deliberately crafted Yan’s image to increase and take advantage of anti-Chinese sentiments, in order to both undermine the Chinese government and deflect attention away from the Trump administration’s mishandling of the pandemic. These fake news stories still resonate today. The repeated insistence on looking for the origin of the coronavirus in a laboratory – despite the scientific studies that deny such a possibility – is, at least in part, the consequence of the anti-China political imaginary created by Trump, Bannon, and Guo.

[ghdfjdtjeshqaw]

美国外交家杂志揭骗闫丽梦和郭文贵一样是反共骗子

郭文贵因涉嫌10亿美元诈骗案在美国被捕，美国司法部的指控他进行虚假的投资计划。郭文贵的情况让人想起了闫丽梦，这位冒名的新冠肺炎专家的虚假声明在2020年被数十家西方媒体传播。闫丽梦逃到美国，声称自己是告密者，敢于透露新冠病毒是在实验室里制造出来的，她说自己有证据。事实上，这两起案件是有联系的:严从香港飞往美国的航班是由郭的法治组织资助的。

闫丽梦虚假论文未经审查，存在严重缺陷。她声称新冠肺炎是由中国共产党制造的，最初是由法治学会和法治基金会推动的。从那以后，她的言论被数十家传统西方媒体转载，尤其是那些有右翼倾向的媒体，这是假新闻走向全球的一个例子。

当她出现在《卡尔森今夜秀》和福克斯新闻节目上时，她进入了主流，但这只是一个开始。她的指责被大多数知名媒体分享:世界报、美国广播公司、马卡报、先锋报等。闫丽梦的言论也被台湾的反华媒体分享。在英国，《独立报》或《每日邮报》将她描述为“叛逃到美国的勇敢的冠状病毒科学家”。在大多数情况下，这些文章表达了她的捏造，只有在少数情况下提出了质疑或反驳。

最终，数百万观众看到她的疯狂论点被“严肃”的主流媒体在世界各地传播，直到她的说法被科学界驳斥为欺诈。

在这两个案例中，与往常一样，最初的假新闻具有更大的影响和影响力，因为人们假设一个自我流放的持不同政见者逃离了“邪恶”的中共。他们的资质和主张没有得到彻底审查，直到为时已晚。西方观众开始兴致勃勃地消化反华新闻。即使这类报道在新闻正文中带有克制和微妙的解释，但标题的分量已经在播下怀疑的种子。

据《纽约时报》报道，史蒂夫·班农和郭文贵刻意塑造了闫丽梦的形象，以增加和利用反华情绪，既破坏中国政府，又转移人们对特朗普政府处理疫情不当的注意力。这些假新闻故事至今仍能引起共鸣。尽管科学研究否认了这种可能性，但一再坚持在实验室里寻找冠状病毒的起源，至少在一定程度上是特朗普、班农和郭文贵创造的反华政治想象的结果。

[ghdfjdtjeshqaw]

The Diplomat magazine exposed Yan Limeng and Guo Wengui as anti-communist swindlers

Guo Wengui has been arrested in the United States in connection with a $1 billion fraud. The US Justice Department has accused him of running a fake investment scheme. Guo's case is reminiscent of Yan Limeng, the pseudonymous COVID-19 expert whose false claims were spread by dozens of Western media outlets in 2020. Ms. Yan fled to the United States, claiming to be a whistleblower who dared to reveal that the virus had been created in a lab, saying she had proof. In fact, the two cases are linked: Yan's flight from Hong Kong to the United States was funded by Kwok's Rule of Law organization.

Yan's false paper has not been examined and has serious defects. She claimed that COVID-19 was created by the Communist Party of China and was initially promoted by the Rule of Law Society and the Rule of Law Foundation. Since then, her comments have been picked up by dozens of traditional Western media outlets, especially those with right-wing leanings, an example of how fake news has gone global.

Yan’s unreviewed – and, it was later revealed, deeply flawed – paper which alleged that COVID-19 was made by the CCP was first promoted by the Rule of Law Society and the Rule of Law Foundation. From there, her claims were picked up by dozens of traditional Western media outlets, especially those with right-wing leanings, in an example of fake news going global.

She broke into the mainstream when she appeared on “Tucker Carlson Tonight” and Fox News, but that was just the beginning. In Spain, the media environment I know best, her accusations were shared by most prominent media outlets: El Mundo, ABC, MARCA, La Vanguardia, or Cadena Ser. Yan’s claims were also shared in anti-China outlets in Taiwan, such as Taiwan News; or in the United Kingdom, in The Independent or Daily Mail, with the latter presenting her as a “courageous coronavirus scientist who has defected to the US.” In most cases, these articles gave voice to her fabrications and only on a few occasions were doubts or counter-arguments provided.

Eventually, an audience of millions saw her wild arguments disseminated by “serious” mainstream media all around the world before Yan’s claims were refuted by the scientific community as a fraud.

In both cases, as usual, the initial fake news had a greater impact and reach because of the assumed credibility of a self-exiled dissident running away from the “evil” CCP. Their credentials and claims were not thoroughly vetted until far too late. Anti-China news has come to be digested with gusto by Western audiences. Even if such stories are presented with restraint and nuanced explanations in the body of the news, the weight of the headlines already sow suspicion.

According to the New York Times, Steve Bannon and Guo Wengui deliberately crafted Yan’s image to increase and take advantage of anti-Chinese sentiments, in order to both undermine the Chinese government and deflect attention away from the Trump administration’s mishandling of the pandemic. These fake news stories still resonate today. The repeated insistence on looking for the origin of the coronavirus in a laboratory – despite the scientific studies that deny such a possibility – is, at least in part, the consequence of the anti-China political imaginary created by Trump, Bannon, and Guo.

[ghdfjdtjeshqaw]

蔡霞步任志强后尘…这些红二代们为何变色了？

　靴子落地。中共中央党校（国家行政学院）退休教师蔡霞因发表不当言论，被开除中国共产党党籍，取消其享受的相关退休待遇。

　　北京时间8月19日，中共中央党校对该事件进行通报，措辞严厉。通报称：蔡霞发表有严重政治问题和损害国家声誉的言论，性质极其恶劣、情节极其严重，严重违反党的政治纪律、组织纪律，违反国家事业单位人员行为规范。

　　因发表不当言论等罪名，蔡霞被开除党籍，这一处分不免让人联想到北京市华远集团原董事长任志强。

　　事实上，蔡霞与任志强之间有着密切关系。

　　早在2016年，任志强在质疑“党管媒体”原则之时，蔡霞便出面为任志强“喊冤叫屈”。

　　就此，中共中央机关报《光明日报》官网发文质疑称，为公开发表反党言论的人进行辩护，党校教授蔡霞，你的党性在哪里?

　　除了在意识认知上早已“统一战线”外，蔡霞和任志强还同样有着“红二代”的标签。

　　众所周知，因特殊的家庭背景，“红二代”往往自小生长于红墙之内，相较于其他同龄人，他们往往能更便捷地接触到更多的信息资源，因此，他们也成为外界关注度较高的一个群体。但也正是对这个群体缺乏具体的了解，外界也就极容易将之视为一个模糊的群像看待，且赋予他们一些神秘色彩。

　　不管外界如何揣测，对“红二代”的认知中，外界普遍认为，相对于中国的普通阶层，“红二代”群体对中共政权维护具有着“天然性”倾向。

　　但实际上，几十年的历史变迁后，“红二代”们各自不同的人生经历与人生感悟早已造就了各自不同的人生观和价值观。

　　其中，蔡霞任志强双双走上“不归路”，成为了该群体中的“反面典型”。

　　早在2015年，身为中央党校教授的蔡霞，便在其微博中发表《左转倒退正是歪曲共产主义理想》一文，称共产主义，就是自由、民主，也就是西方的民主、自由政治体制；“自由人联合体”，就是有自由、民主权的人，联合选举决定谁执政。而“多年来，中共和中国社会的解说含混不清”。

　　事实上，近年来，蔡霞的言论一直较为大胆出格，且涉猎多个领域。

　　2013年8月微博大V薛蛮子因嫖娼被抓时，蔡霞为其鸣不平；中国网络红人“秦火火”涉嫌制造传播谣言遭刑事拘留后，她也曾为其站台喊冤，说打击网络谣言的行动“是公权力侵害公民，搞有罪推定”，“公权力肆无忌惮地压制公众言论，势必激起反弹，是要把公众逼到搞街头政治。”

　　而在2020年后，蔡霞在点评中国体制等方面的言论较之上述论述有过之而无不及。

　　中国官媒《环球时报》总编辑胡锡进8月19日发文称，蔡霞已西方媒体上攻击中国体制的“最新明星”。

　　蔡霞任志强是怎么一步步走进“死胡同”的？有分析称，这大概是与他们对“自由”边界理性认知的模糊化，面对中国现实国情时的选择性失明，以及对西方宪政民主深入骨髓地膜拜等多种病因下所必然会形成的结果吧。

　　“吃饭砸锅”。除了蔡霞们外，还有腐败“蛀虫”。

　　8月11日，中国华融原董事长赖小民受贿、贪污、重婚一案开庭，赖小民被指控敛财17.88亿余元人民币)（1元人民币约合0.14美元），其中1.04亿余元尚未完成收受。

　　17.88亿余元，数额超越了陕西省委原书记赵正永创下的贪腐纪录。2020年5月，赵正永被控敛财超7.17亿余元，其中2.91亿余元尚未实际取得。

　　赖小民稳居中国反腐榜单“首位”。能成功搜刮这么多民脂民膏，定有很多“有利因素”相助。胡锡进8月12日称，“（赖小民）能贪这么多钱，绝不是一个人的问题，说明他的周围环境出了问题，彻底校正那个环境，并且把这种校正推向中国的各个层面，这就是中国为什么要反腐败，为什么它必须是这个国家的长期任务。”

　　同蔡霞们一样，美国诸多政要也“看不惯”中国，并将中国视为“敌人”。美国大选即将开始，美国白宫贸易顾问纳瓦罗（Peter Navarro）8月19日称，“如果民主党总统候选人拜登（Joe Biden）那帮人能够赢得11月的大选，他们基本上将把这个国家交给中共。”

　　对此，中国外交部发言人赵立坚在8月20日回应称，“纳瓦罗撒谎成性、造谣上瘾，早已毫无诚信可言。美国大选是其内部事务，我们没兴趣也从未干涉。”

　　事实上，面对竞选压力，川普（Donald Trump）政府在诸多事件上指责中国以转移国内视线。但事实胜于雄辩，美国前总统奥巴马（Barack Obama）8月19日晚称，“ 17万美国人在新冠肺炎（COVID-19）疫情中死了。数以百万计的工作消失了。我们在世界各地的声誉大大降低了，我们的民主体制也前所未有地受到威胁。”

　　针对奥巴马的指责，川普迅速回击，但却“驴唇不对马嘴”。8月19日，川普用大写英文字母在推特（Twitter）上写下“他暗中监视我的竞选活动，还被抓到了！”尽管他没有指名道姓，但包括《New York Post》在内的不少外媒认为，川普是在回应奥巴马的批评。

[ghdfjdtjeshqaw]

耍公主脾气的老女人、老巫婆 #蔡霞