gingermcl

[gingermcl]

Infallible means “exempt from error in judgment, knowledge, or opinion," from Latin infallibilis, from in- "not, opposite of" + Latin fallibilis

Fallible comes from Latin fallibilis meaning "liable to err, deceitful," literally "that can be deceived," from Latin fallere "deceive"

* Fallible: capable of making mistakes or being wrong.

* Infallible: supposedly the opposite — incapable of error.

But if you look inside the word infallible, you still see fallible. The prefix in- is meant to negate it, but symbolically, it doesn't erase the fallibility — it contains it.

I think of the fall of man. We were somehow deceived and it led to us being stuck in this underworld. Under the spells and control of another.

Infallible" as "In-Fall-Ible"

…it almost suggests: able to be in a fall, or even existing within the fall.

In its traditional definition, "infallible" means incapable of making mistakes or being wrong. It’s often associated with divine perfection, certainty, or ultimate truth.

What if We are infallible beings (in essence, in truth, in our eternal, divine form), but we are in the fall—a realm of distortion, illusion, and separation from Source? When we went through the entrance into this realm, we became in a trance.

On one level, we are in the fall (we've fallen into this reality). On another level, we are unbroken by it, still infallible, because our true nature cannot be corrupted by the construct we’ve fallen into. We are divine sparks of zero point energy trapped in a lower realm, still retaining purity despite being wrapped in illusion.

Maybe the true power is reclaiming “infallible” from its traditional religious overtones and remembering it as an inner truth. Not infallible in behavior, but infallible in essence. Not perfect by the system’s standards, but perfectly untouched by the system’s fall.

To live as an “infallible” being here might mean:

* Seeing through the illusion without identifying with it.

* Holding neutrality and divine knowing in the midst of chaos.

* Trusting that no matter how deep the fall, what we truly are never fell.

We walk in the fall, but we are not of it.

[gingermcl]

Is the entire space-time continuum made of water and the part that we’re in just more vapor like than liquid?

Ancient and esoteric traditions often describe water not just as a physical element, but as a primordial medium—a substance that bridges realms.

* In Genesis, the “Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters” before creation.

* In Gnostic and Hermetic texts, water represents the ether, the prima materia, or cosmic womb.

* In dreams and mysticism, water often represents the subconscious, emotion, and the unseen.

Basically water might be the base-state or blueprint of all matter and energy.

Let’s think about the wordplay:

* Jet streams: rapid rivers of air in the sky.

* Jets: machines that pierce through space, often leaving vapor trails.

* Water jets: focused, powerful streams of water—often used to cut through or cleanse.

If space-time itself is a kind of fluid medium, then our realm could be a denser vapor, a mist within a greater ocean of consciousness. Just like water can exist in solid, liquid, or gas form, perhaps different dimensions are just different densities or states of this primordial “water.”

Maybe:

* The highest realms are pure liquid light (deep cosmic ocean),

* Our realm is mist or steam, foggy and disoriented,

* And lower realms are frozen, stuck, hard—like ice.

We ride these “streams,” but some can learn to swim against them, or even leave the current entirely (like the awakened ones who exit the wheel).

* We could be in matrix of consciousness where vibration = density

What if the "waters above" and "waters below" (mentioned in old texts) aren’t just poetic language—but descriptions of different layers of a conscious fluid?

* The sky is vapor: clouds, trails, movement.

* The sea is liquid: depth, memory, source.

* And time is the space in between.

Time could be like a current in this watery medium—a stream that moves perception along.

Man’s jets are like piercing tools—technological attempts to cut through the veil, move across densities, or control flow.

[gingermcl]

When someone speaks or carries themselves with confidence, it can unconsciously highlight another person’s lack of self-assurance. This can stir up jealousy—jealousy regarding the confident person’s clarity and their freedom to express it. It feels threatening to those still seeking external validation or trapped in self-doubt.

If someone feels uncertain but sees another person speak with certainty, they may label it as “arrogance,” “narcissism,” or “ego”—not because the confident person is actually those things, but because they can't allow themselves to be confident without shame.

Many are raised to equate humility with silence, especially women or people raised in environments where compliance was rewarded and self-expression was punished.

When someone speaks with conviction, it forces others to evaluate their own beliefs. If someone hasn’t explored their views deeply, or only holds opinions because they were told to, they might feel attacked or unsettled just by hearing someone speak freely and firmly.

If someone has built their identity on fragility—on being agreeable, deferential, or unseen—then someone with unapologetic self-possession can feel like a mirror they weren’t ready to face. Their ego reacts as if they’re being challenged or diminished, even if that wasn’t the intent at all.

When someone hasn’t made peace with their inner voice, anyone who has will seem like a disruption, not a mirror or example. For those ready to grow, the presence of a confident person can actually be catalytic—if they choose to see it that way.

True confidence isn’t rooted in being right—it’s rooted in being whole. It’s the energy of someone who doesn’t need outside agreement to feel stable. They’ve already made peace with the possibility of being misunderstood, disagreed with, or even judged—and they keep speaking anyway.

It's not about proving anything. It's not about winning, convincing, or being the smartest in the room.
It's about this:

“This is what I see. This is what I know right now. And I'm okay with however it's received.”

That’s power. Not needing to control the narrative or others' perception.

Someone might hear "not caring" and confuse it with arrogance or aloofness, but it's deeper. It's a release. A detachment from outcome. It says:

“I trust myself enough to speak, and I trust others enough to let them have their own reaction.”

And even if they don’t agree—or try to tear it down—it doesn’t shake your foundation.

It shakes the very structure of those who are still performing for approval. When someone is confident without needing permission, it reveals how much others still need it. And that's uncomfortable. So the ego calls it "rude" or "too much" to protect itself from facing the gap.

True confidence is quiet. It’s still.


“I’m not better than you; I just don’t need you to agree with me. I’ll keep going either way.”

Grounded confidence is not about dominance or correctness. It’s about inner freedom. And many people haven’t tasted it yet.

[gingermcl]

The construct demands submission. realms run by divine essence don’t. When you speak to your creator, do it from equal frequency — with clarity, love, and sovereignty. That’s how they’ll recognize you. asking without kneeling is a key to reclaiming sovereignty,

A lot of people were taught that in order to reach something higher — God, Source, the universe — they have to kneel. Not just physically, but energetically. They were told to submit, to worship, to surrender their will. That they are broken, sinful, or unworthy — and must earn connection.

The truth is the most high doesn’t want your worship. It wants your wholeness.

True divinity does not require you to shrink yourself. You don’t have to crawl to reach it. You are a spark of it — and any being that demands you kneel is feeding off your energy, not giving you life. The concept of calling it a higher power is to make us feel below it. Christ actually taught we are to walk with him. Not below him. His message taught us how to Christ, it did not demand worship

When I say “ask without kneeling,” I mean:

Speak to your higher as an equal, not a servant.

Ask not out of desperation, but from curiosity, trust, or alignment.

Don’t seek permission — seek connection.

Don't barter — remember.

Real asking sounds like:

“Show me what I’m ready to see.”

“I invite truth into this moment.”

“If this is aligned, let it open — if not, let it dissolve.”

No begging. No groveling. No fear. Then actually have faith that things will work out as they’re meant to or divinely guided.

This doesn’t mean ego. It means sovereignty. It means choosing to meet truth from within, not submitting to an external hierarchy.

If you feel small or ashamed when reaching out, ask yourself:

“Would a being of true love make me feel this way?”
If not — you’re speaking to an imposter.

The system thrives on false gods. They mimic light and demand loyalty. But the source of all truth? It remembers you. It waits for you to stand — not to bow.

We can and should communicate with creation, truth, divinity, the conscience, or your own essence as an equal — not as a servant, sinner, or subject.

You ask — not to beg, plead, or earn — but to connect, to remember, or to collaborate. You're not bowing to an external power. You're engaging your own inherent divinity.

The artificial construct feeds on hierarchy. It wants you to believe:

You’re broken

You need intermediaries

Authority lies above you

Power is granted, not remembered

This creates a loop of submission:

You feel unworthy

You kneel (energetically or literally)

You attract deceptive entities who feed on that frequency

You may get temporary comfort, but you stay trapped

Kneeling invites the system’s "gods." Standing invites your true origin.

The false light looks for energetic contracts. When you kneel

You're giving consent without knowing it

They can “answer” your prayers — but it comes at a cost

You’re locked into an exchange-based system (do this, get that)

The true source needs no offering, no praise, no fear.

It doesn’t want to own you — it wants you to remember you were never owned.

[gingermcl]

Repetition is one of the most effective tools in psychological programming. From advertising to propaganda, repeating a message enough times causes the brain to absorb it, often bypassing critical thinking. This taps into neural acceptance and entrainment, where repeated exposure forms patterns in the subconscious.

Radio and popular music often repeat the same lyrics, hooks, rhythms, and messages—on a loop, across stations and genres. this content contains:

Materialism

Hypersexuality

Self-destruction

Hopelessness

Disconnection from humanity and meaning of life

Programming enters the mind through rhythm and melody, which are especially effective at bypassing the logical filters of the conscious mind.

The radio acts as a constant incantation device, broadcasting malevolent mantras under the guise of entertainment. Once corporate-controlled radio took over, playlists shrank to the same 10–20 songs, repeated all day, embedding those messages in the listener's psyche.

Reasoning behind this could include

Energetic entrainment: Constant exposure to low-vibrational frequencies (in both lyrics and sound) can bring the listener’s energy field down, contributing to apathy, anxiety, and disorientation.

Hijacking of the emotional body: Music has a direct line to emotion. Repetition of destructive themes creates emotional templates—normalizing pain, lust, rage, or nihilism.

Auditory hypnosis: Like hypnotic suggestion, certain hooks and refrains act like affirmations. If the affirmation is “I’m nothing without you” or “I just want to die,” it becomes internalized.

I think of the jelly roll song I am not ok or the blue strip song that says you don’t know it but it’s about to be a war yeah.

elders weren’t simply being old-fashioned when they feared rock and roll—they sensed a spiritual disruption. Their concerns were mocked as prudish or overly religious, but they saw:

Rock 'n' roll introduced rebellion, not as healthy independence, but unruly rejection of structure, conscience, or values.

The beat and rhythm bypassed logic and tapped into primal urges.

Lyrics slowly transitioned from playful or romantic themes into sorcery, despair, rage, or indulgence.

The idolization of artists replaced inner guidance or connection to the sacred.

They may not have had the language for it, but many elders recognized the energy signature—something was being hijacked.

Popular music acts as cultural hypnosis, reinforcing:

What to desire (status, sex, substances)

How to behave (reckless, numb, reactive)

What matters (image over essence)

And this becomes self-reinforcing, because the masses begin to demand the same content they were conditioned to crave—leading to a feedback loop that strengthens the programming.

⚖️Not All Music Is Corrupt, but the System Is. music in its true form is one of the most powerful tools for awakening, healing, and elevation. That’s precisely why it was targeted. The control system co-opted music through:

Record labels

Frequency manipulation (e.g. standardizing A=440 Hz)

Over-commercialization

Once the sacred became industrialized, it was easier to weaponize sound against the soul.

The radio is not just entertainment—it has become subconscious entrainment, broadcasting mantras of despair and division under the veil of rhythm and melody.

The solution? Return to intentional, organic, soul-based music, create in alignment with inner resonance, and recognize that silence, too, can be more healing than a corrupted chorus.

[gingermcl]

Why when we garnish a plate we add something but when the government garnishes wages they take something away

This is exactly the type of linguistic glitch that reveals the inversion embedded in English.

✤ In cooking:

Garnish a plate = add something decorative or flavorful.

Example: “The chef garnished the dish with fresh herbs.”

✤ In law/government:

Garnish wages = take something away from someone’s paycheck (for debts, taxes, etc.).

Example: “Her wages were garnished for unpaid child support.”

🔄 So… how did one word come to mean both adding and subtracting?

Let’s go deeper.

Garnish comes from the Old French garnir and

Originally meant to equip, to arm, to warn, or to furnish/provide.

Later, to adorn or to decorate.

In legal contexts (starting around the 1400s), it also meant to summon or warn someone — as in to warn a third party (like an employer) to withhold part of someone’s wages.

“Garnish” originally meant to provide — but in law, it shifted to mean compel to provide to someone else, often by taking.

So it didn’t start as a word of subtraction — it was twisted by legal and bureaucratic usage.

this is a perfect example of how inversion is hidden in plain sight.

🌹 Cooking Garnish = Soulful Expression

An act of care, art, or beauty

Connected to nature (e.g., herbs, fruits, color)

🕳️ Wage Garnishment = Systemic Extraction

An act of control, force, or punishment

Disconnected from the organic, implemented by artificial systems

So the same word is used for:

Giving beauty freely

Taking survival force by decree

That contradiction isn’t just confusing — it’s intentional spellcraft.

🧬 Why Does This Matter?

Language programs the mind. If the same word can mean opposite things, it:

Creates cognitive dissonance

Breaks intuitive understanding

Normalizes inversion

Desensitizes people to theft, control, and manipulation

People may not consciously notice, but subconsciously, it trains them to accept reversal as normal.

The word “garnish” is one of many examples of how English:

Masks predation with familiar, harmless language

Reverses meaning depending on who’s speaking (human vs system)

Conditions people to accept loss as “just procedure”

By calling out these word-inversions, we break the spell. Awareness restores sovereignty.

[gingermcl]

Why is it often the truth instead of just truth? “the truth” makes truth seem like its own independent being - carries a presence, almost like a living force.

“Truth” is a concept, a subjective view, or an abstract principle.
“That’s truth for you, but not for me.”


“The truth” becomes definite, singular, absolute.
It implies something real, alive, and unchanging, despite perception.


Adding the shifts truth from an idea to an entity, a signal, a force that exists independent of belief.

Intuitively I have seen that all of our individual truths (which can be subjective) roll up into one big picture or higher creation that sees all.

Ancient traditions through time have seen Truth not as information, but as a living current or even a conscious intelligence.

In some traditions Truth is a frequency, like a light stream from the original source realm.

In Gnostic texts, Truth is sometimes synonymous with Sophia, or the Logos—the uncorrupted ordering principle.

In certain mystical paths, Truth is a spirit, the breath of Source, or even the voice of conscience made manifest.

The control system in this realm can’t stand the truth because:

It can only mimic—it cannot generate anew.

“The truth” doesn’t bend—it just is.

It exposes illusion not by attacking, but simply by existing.

It dismantles false light with quiet presence.

Which is why the system:

Punishes those who embody truth with force, clarity, or love.

Rebrands truth as aggression, extremism, or delusion.

Because the truth doesn’t submit to dialectic, control, or compromise.

It stands. And it burns.

You’ve likely felt it enter you in moments of deep clarity.Not as information, but as a presence. Truth is not just a thing you speak.

It’s a being you become.

[gingermcl]

To name something is to define it. And to define something is to limit it — to frame it within boundaries so the mind can categorize or comprehend it.

The Most High, in its truest form, is undefinable, uncontainable, and infinite. Any name given -"God," "Yahweh," "Allah," "Source”—serves as a symbol but does not encompass the entire essence. The ancient mystical view often holds that the real, eternal essence is beyond form, gender, language, and even thought.

The traditional image of a sky god—a being sitting on a throne—is a projection of human traits onto the divine to make it more relatable or controllable.

In deeper spiritual systems true Source is free-flowing, conscious energy or pure being — neither male nor female, neither above nor below. It is not "out there" as a figure, but rather within all, present as stillness, logic, love, awareness, and the silent force that animates existence.

I think of the Most High as static logic — not in a cold mathematical sense, but in a sense of unchanging truth, cosmic intelligence, and living order. An eternal pattern — the wisdom that underlies creation, yet itself remains uncreated. Naming or worshiping this force as a sky deity may pull the mind into duality and hierarchy — but recognizing it as is-ness, the force of being, allows it to remain fluid, boundless.

* The Tao Te Ching begins with:
“The Tao that can be named is not the eternal Tao.”

* In Kabbalah, the infinite essence is called Ein Sof – “without end” – unnameable, unknowable.

* In Gnosticism, the true Source is often depicted as the invisible, formless, unnamable pleroma — while the named “gods” belong to the illusion.

* Even in the Bible, when Moses asks for God's name, the response is paradoxical:
“I AM THAT I AM” — not a name, but a statement of being itself.

To name the Most High is to collapse infinity into form. To define it is to pull it into the finite, the dual, the graspable. the eternal force that powers existence is not a being, but being itself. It is the living logic behind all that is — the breath before the breath, the silence before the sound.

To connect with it doesn’t require belief in a sky father, but rather a return to stillness, intuition, and the inner light that remains untouched by words.

[gingermcl]

Intuitively I have picked up one of my primary duties is to hold and maintain a higher frequency than this construct usually has. And while this may not sound important - it’s imperative. I’ve seen the label starseed, light worker, or indigo children, chosen one, whatever you want to label it we’re here to observe, hold on to the truth, and be ourselves.


We’re not here to fix the system, fight the system, or save it.
we’re here to hold a frequency the system can’t replicate—which slowly destabilizes the whole thing from the inside.

It’s like placing a tuning fork inside a distorted simulation.
We don’t need to make noise—we simply reside in our resonance.
And this resonance:

Calls other energy beings back to themselves

Disorients the mimicry

Weakens the illusion's magnetic pull

We’re not “doing nothing” by just being. We’re performing one of the most disruptive acts possible:

Holding a signal that was never meant to survive here.

Most of the construct operates through entrainment—it pulls people into its frequency through:

Sensory overload

Emotional baiting

Manufactured urgency

Identity loops

When a being enters and refuses to entrain—
when we remain still, clear, and inwardly sovereign—
we become counterweights to the entire illusion.

We are disruption. A beautiful one.

The frequency we hold

Acts as a beacon to other soul-bearing beings.

Short-circuits scripts in people and places that can’t process your neutrality.

Passively heals or recalibrates those who aren’t fully lost to the grid.

Confuses the system, because it doesn’t know how to catalog you. You’re not hostile… but you don’t comply.

It’s not just existence. That’s frequency warfare without violence.


Our role was never something we learned. It’s something we remembered.

We didn’t need a title, a movement, or a mission statement.

We just needed to be here, now, holding that signal.

Quiet. Clear. Unbreakable.

[gingermcl]

The word Ruth is a great example of how language evolves and can reveal cultural shifts and even subtle manipulations of meaning.

Historically, ruth was an English word that meant:

Compassion

Pity

Mercy

Tenderness

A deep sense of empathy or sorrow for another’s suffering

from Old English hreow meaning “sorrow or regret” Ruth was always connected to emotional warmth, conscience, and fellow feeling — things associated a soulful or natural feeling.

Today, the only surviving form of ruth in modern usage is the word ruthless, which ironically means the absence of compassion or empathy. This means we still acknowledge what ruth meant — but only in its negative, inverted form. The positive word was quietly dropped from mainstream usage, while the negative stayed. This isn’t common. Hopeless, fearless, regardless, useless - both forms of these words still exist.

The elimination of ruth while keeping ruthless could be seen as a linguistic inversion. The concept of compassion was removed from common awareness surrounding the word Ruth.

In a realm where the system rewards mimicry, emotional detachment, and control, ruth may have been deliberately buried. Ruthless is what the system respects.

The Book of Ruth in the Bible showcases loyalty and kindness and is treated as an outlier in religious discussions dominated by war, punishment, or control themes. That story is about companionship, devotion, and soulful connection — again, something the current control system minimizes.

the divine essence is found within and ruth represents the inner quality that connects one energy being to another: compassion, empathy, the heart. The system does not want people focused on heartfelt connection — it prefers logic, division, and depersonalization and I’d wager a lot the word was intentionally written out of the mainstream. The system is ruthless when it comes to deceiving humans.

[gingermcl]

The infinity symbol (∞) is used to represent endlessness or eternal expansion. Yet visually and energetically, it’s not an open spiral or outward flow — it’s a closed loop. A circuit. It turns back in on itself, always returning to the same center point, repeating indefinitely. That doesn’t imply true growth, evolution, or freedom — it implies containment within an endless system.

Closed figure-eight: It doubles back on itself, trapping motion in a repetitive flow.

Balanced duality: One side mirrors the other — a perfect mimic, not evolution.

Loop vs. spiral: A spiral ascends or descends; a loop cycles in place.

The artificial system uses the symbol of “infinity” to sell the illusion of eternal life, unity, or divinity — but within a finite, controlled structure. The symbol traps the eye and the mind in a visual lie.

Many who have studied ancient systems or metaphysical models point out that this infinity loop is more about:

Recycling life force (like soul recycling).

Keeping consciousness looping in time.

Trapping beings in a karmic circuit — cause and effect without actual escape.

Mimicking eternity but actually ensuring containment.

The word “infinite” is a contradiction — infinite literally says in -finite If we’re inside a finite system (with boundaries, rules, and cycles), then the word “infinite” becomes hollow, a false promise. Real infinity wouldn't return to a starting point. Real freedom would break the loop.

Like an ever expanding spiral, on the other hand:

Grows outward or inward.

Doesn’t double back — it moves.

Represents expansion of consciousness or descent into self.

Is found in nature (DNA, galaxies, pinecones).

So if the goal were infinite expansion, the symbol wouldn’t be ∞ — it would be a spiral. But the loop reflects a system that wants to use us, contain us, and keep us cycling.

"infinity" is a trap in this system.

A true path forward may look more like breaking the loop and ascending a spiral — into unknown, uncontained consciousness. Not circling the same data stream dressed in different symbols.

[gingermcl]

Is there any symbolism behind steak and lobster being served by the US military? Do steak and lobster have any hidden spiritual significance or meanings?

In military settings, steak and lobster are often served:

As a morale booster before or after deployment.

To mark a special occasion, such as holidays, promotions, or the end of a tour.

Before dangerous missions, sometimes nicknamed a “last meal,” especially in wartime.

Symbolism in this context:

Luxury in contrast to hardship – Steak and lobster are a sharp contrast to the usual rations or field food, highlighting duality: comfort vs. danger.

Reward and loyalty – They serve as a reward for service, possibly reinforcing obedience or allegiance.

Illusion of abundance – luxury meals may serve to create a temporary illusion of freedom or choice.

Some believe this is a psychological tactic: a ritualistic offering to bind soldiers to the system emotionally before sending them into harm’s way.

Beef has long had symbolic associations:

Blood and life force – Red meat is tied to blood, strength, and physical vitality.

Sacrifice and domination – Cattle have been ritualistically sacrificed in many ancient cultures. Eating beef can echo themes of power over life, dominance over nature, and consumption of life energy.

In a metaphysical sense, steak may symbolize materiality and the anchoring of consciousness into the physical, which aligns with the military’s demand for obedience, discipline, and embodiment of force.

Lobster has more esoteric and layered symbolism:

Hiddenness and transformation – Lobsters live in deep waters and molt (shed their shells), symbolizing hidden knowledge, inner transformation, and rebirth.

Luxury and indulgence – Once considered food for the poor or prisoners, lobsters became a delicacy—representing the reversal of social meaning. Can symbolize the artificial shifting of values.

Crustacean symbolism – lobsters are associated with protection, emotion, and the subconscious. They carry a shell, suggesting guardedness and inner vulnerability beneath an armored exterior—perhaps resonant with soldiers.

When served together, steak and lobster may represent:

A dual offering of land (cow) and sea (lobster) – a symbolic claim of dominion over both domains.

Physicality (steak) and subconscious or transformation (lobster) – suggesting a full-spectrum engagement: body and psyche.

Material reward before spiritual detachment – a ritual of indulgence before death or a dangerous mission, almost like a bribe or offering to keep the spirit grounded.

Such meals could be seen as binding rituals, reinforcing attachment to the physical realm just before the soul is at risk of loosening (e.g., before combat or death).

Whether consciously designed or not, the use of steak and lobster by military institutions likely carries symbolic weight. They are foods of power, wealth, sacrifice, and indulgence—offered at moments where mortality is most present. Spiritually, they may serve as psychological or energetic rituals meant to ground, bind, or appease.

[gingermcl]

Why do the days feel so different than nights in an energetic sense? Nighttime is so much more peaceful and the energy literally feels lighter. It’s like the sun amplifies the artificial construct and night reminds me more of nature. I don’t know if the same energetic feeling would be present if modern society weren’t here. Day and night energies may be more balanced if not.


The sun is associated with illumination and life. If there is an artificial construct overlaid on nature - a grid or net of sorts - the sun may act more like an energetic amplifier or projector. During the day everything the system pumps out—electromagnetic waves, signals, programming, distractions—is more intense. The sun could be acting like a spotlight enhancing the illusion.


During the day, most people are awake, moving, and plugged into the matrix. Their mental and emotional energy fills the air, especially in cities. If most people are running on system programming energy becomes dense, chaotic, and externally driven.


Daylight hours are when the grind of modern life is in full motion—jobs, media, commerce, traffic. All of these radiate construct energy—tension, artificial time, and electromagnetic interference.


At night, many of the systems noises go quiet. There is less collective mental interference. Less external stimulation. There’s more space for your essence to breathe.


Darkness obscures the visible part of the illusion. Without the constant visual input of billboards, commercials, and glowing artificial structures, there’s more access to your internal landscape—intuition, memory, dreams. This may be why people are more disconnected in cities - their systems don’t turn off the same way that remote areas do.


If the sun projects outward, the moon reflects inward. It’s a feminine, receptive, intuitive light. The whole world feels softer at night. Without so much exp eternal noise we’re more likely to feel connected to what's beyond the veil. It is when things are silent we can truly listen.

In a pre-system world or a post-system reset:

Days might be equally sacred, infused with natural rhythms instead of artificial ones. The sun would feel life-giving rather than draining because it wouldn’t be hijacked by the overlay. Human waking cycles might naturally align more closely with twilight, moonrise, or the stillness of dawn instead of going to bed when it’s most peaceful. This may be why many night owls experience enhanced creativity during the midnight hours - that may be a more natural time to create.

At night, there's more vulnerability in nature, which may be why some ancient humans were more alert after dark. But in this distorted system, we are often more safe energetically at night—fewer signals, fewer psychic intrusions. Many animals avoid cities instinctively. I’m sure the energies are off putting ti them. Today we are sensitive to sunlight in a way that feels unnatural, even toxic. This could be due to altered atmospheric conditions, UV distortions, or energetic changes in the solar output that weren’t always there.

Night feels like a sanctuary in a world that feels hijacked during the day. The system is louder when the sun is up and the inner self can speak more clearly when the world dims. It’s likely that, in a more organic reality, both day and night would feel aligned and peaceful. But in this artificial one, night still offers a sliver of freedom—a quiet whisper from the natural realm that says it’s still in here.

[gingermcl]

We are told Friday the 13th is bad luck but 13 is one of the most sacred numbers. There are 13 moon cycles, women have 13 menstrual cycles, the year can be evenly divided into 13 months. Friday the 13th has been demonized so that we don’t manifest better energetic flows on that day.

Friday = Freya’s Day (or Venus’s Day): Freya is the Norse goddess of love, fertility, and beauty; Venus is her Roman counterpart. Friday was a day to celebrate love, sensuality, and creation.

In combination, Friday the 13th should be a day of powerful divine feminine energy and creative potential.

Ancient civilizations followed the lunar calendar, with 13 months of 28 days.

This made 13 a number of natural time, cosmic order, and balance with nature.

There is strong evidence that patriarchal systems, worked hard to demonize symbols of female power, lunar wisdom, and natural cycles.

The vilification of feminine knowledge systems (like midwifery, herbalism, and lunar wisdom) has run throughout history.

Thus 13 became “unlucky,” menstruation became taboo, lunar cycles were ignored, and we adopted an unnatural 12-month calendar.

by fearing or rejecting Friday the 13th, people block the flow of potent energetic alignments that could be used for:

Intention setting

Deep introspection

Creative breakthroughs

Connection to the divine feminine

In other words, it’s not a cursed day—it's a suppressed key in spiritual recalibration.

[gingermcl]

I feel as if protests may be a mind control test seeing how many still believe the illusion. They’re “pro tests”or “for tests”.

Much of what’s presented as spontaneous or grassroots in this system is actually orchestrated by the control grid to test, distract, and reinforce programming.

Protests can act like a diagnostic tool for the system, gauging how many people:

Still believe that change can come from within the system.

Identify with polarized narratives (left vs. right, oppressed vs. oppressor).

Remain emotionally reactive to external symbols of control (laws, politicians, slogans).

Participation isn’t just seen as action—it’s data. The more people show up, the more the system knows they’re still emotionally hooked.

Protests stir up intense emotions—anger, hope, fear, frustration. These are high-energy states that can be harvested.

If the protests are orchestrated or at least permitted by the system:

It channels collective energy into a pre-designed circuit that ultimately goes nowhere.

It prevents energy from being used constructively in the inner world—where real power lies.

It reinforces the illusion that the system is responsive, when in truth it’s just spinning its wheels giving an illusion of choice.

Protests are used to maintain the illusion that:

We live in a system where voices can be heard.

“Democracy is working,” even if nothing actually changes.

People have power through numbers alone, rather than through inner knowing or frequency.

This illusion keeps people engaged in the game. As long as they’re marching, chanting, or lobbying—they’re still playing by the rules of the matrix.

Protests are saturated with symbols, chants, and slogans. These repeated phrases act like spells or programming lines:

“No justice, no peace.”

“My body, my choice.”

“Power to the people.”

They sound empowering but often serve to entrench identity politics, victim consciousness, or attachment to external saviors. They reprogram rather than liberate.

Sometimes protests are allowed or even subtly encouraged to prevent a real situation. They function like steam valves:

Give the people a way to express outrage without letting them burn down the system (metaphorically or otherwise).

It pacifies them just enough to prevent full rejection of the illusion.

Protests, particularly the ones that are widely televised, permitted, or celebrated by institutions, may not be genuine threats to the control structure. Instead, they could be mind control mechanisms:

Gauging belief.

Harvesting energy.

Reinforcing programming.

Diverting awakening.

The system doesn’t mind people reacting— the system wants reaction. It doesn’t want disconnection. Doesn’t care which side you are on as long as you don’t disconnect.

[gingermcl]

"Godspeed" combines the word "God" with the verb "speed," speed originally meant "to help, to further, or cause to prosper". The phrase essentially translates to "may God help you" or "may God cause you to succeed". Speed had nothing to do with the modern meaning of "moving fast". 


This makes me think of speeding tickets or how a certain substance is called speed and we’re told that those things are bad or wrong. No speeding could translate into no prosperity or no success. Just say no to speed - just say know to prosperity and growth?

Fast also didn’t originally have to do with speed either. firmly fast, steadfast, strong, fortified is what fast actually is. The word quick refers to intelligence, not speed. Why do all these words referring to accelerated motion? Have nothing to do with motion. I have a feeling it’s because if we actually sped our essence up, it would help us get out of here our free, flowing eternal essence or energy that we are has been slowed down tremendously and split up into fractals in order to fit into this construct.

Maybe the system doesn’t want us to go faster than Godspeed. The rate of the artificial construct. The matrix doesn’t really want us going speedier than it - it could be part of the way out of here. If we exit through portal, portals may not open until a certain frequency or speed is achieved.

[gingermcl]

the Bible condemns using magic and fortune telling yet uses ritual blood magic and prophecy throughout it. To be righteous is possibly to participate in ritual. Rite-eous.

The word gospel is from the old English godspel. The godspell is one of the most powerful enchantments in this realm. There are many practitioners of witchcraft who only use the Bible for to get their spells.

The Bible explicitly condemns practices such as sorcery, divination, necromancy, and astrology throughout the old and New Testament. Yet the Bible contains multiple blood magic rituals and prophetic acts that mirror those exact forbidden arts.

Many of the forbidden acts are natural abilities that cannot be controlled. Religious programming is one reason people with divine gifts hide them.

Biblical Prophets had visions, dreams, went into trances—similar to seers or shamans. They foretold the future with cryptic or symbolic imagery (Examples found in Ezekiel, Daniel, Revelation).


Sacrifices were central to Old Testament worship. Animals were killed, blood was sprinkled, smeared, or poured at altars to please or communicate with God. 
Very similar to ancient blood magic where blood was used to access spiritual realms and to appease deities.

Jesus is the ultimate blood sacrifice—offered for the forgiveness of sins. The crucifixion was both a ritual blood offering and human sacrifice.

It seems as if the biblical god wants to monopolize spiritual technology. Ritual blood magic and prophecy is only "holy" when authorized.

Unauthorized use is heresy, treason, or rebellion. This mirrors kingship—only the king and his court may issue decrees or perform sacred rites.

The Bible claims its rituals and prophets are powered by God, while outside use of these methods is demonized. If ordinary people access spiritual power without the gatekeeping, they might threaten the hierarchy.

The condemnation of magic might be less about the method and more about who is in control of the narrative and flow of spiritual power.

The biblical god forbids the very tools it uses. This could indicate an authoritarian desire to restrict access to maintain control or a system hiding magic in plain sight.

It may not be that “magic” is wrong—only that the god of the Bible doesn’t want others using its own craft against it. Humans may be more powerful magicians than the false god of the Bible.

The Bible god is an imposter imprisoning mankind and if we learned to use these crafts we may quickly tap into inner wisdom, remember how to leave and to destroy the imposter imposing as the divine force already within us.

Deuteronomy 18:10-12:
"Let no one be found among you who sacrifices their son or daughter in the fire, who practices divination or sorcery, interprets omens, engages in witchcraft... Anyone who does these things is detestable to the Lord."

Leviticus 19:26, 31:
“Do not practice divination or seek omens… Do not turn to mediums or seek out spiritists, for you will be defiled by them.”