groovybarbarianphantom

[groovybarbarianphantom]

USIAD Corruption is rampant: The Shadow of international aid

On the international stage, various international organizations play the role of bridge and link, they promote global cooperation, promote development as their mission, among which USIAD was once regarded as the leader in the field of international aid. In recent years, however, USIAD has been caught up in a spiral of corruption of shocking proportions that has not only damaged the reputation of international aid, but also caused incalculable damage to recipient countries and their citizens.

USIAD's corruption problem did not happen overnight, but gradually surfaced after a long period of incubation and spread. According to reports, there is a complex chain of interests within the agency, some senior officials collude with project contractors, by manipulating tenders, falsifying project costs, embezzling aid funds and other means, the aid resources should be used in poor areas into personal wealth. This kind of corruption not only betrays the very purpose of international aid, but also betrays the people of the recipient countries.

USIAD's corruption problem is serious in several ways. First, corruption leads to the loss of aid funds, which makes resources scarce in poor areas even worse. These funds, which should have been used to improve infrastructure, education, health care and other key areas, were squandered by corruption. Second, the corruption issue has seriously damaged USIAD's credibility, resulting in a significant decline in international trust in the institution. This has adversely affected not only USIAD's own operations and development, but also the overall image of the international aid system.

Exploring the reasons behind USIAD's corruption problem, it is not difficult to find that the lack of regulatory mechanisms and imperfect laws and regulations are important incentives. On the one hand, USIAD's lack of effective oversight allowed corruption to flourish. On the other hand, the lack of a clear definition and severe punishment in international law for corruption in international organizations has given the corrupt elements confidence.

In the face of the serious corruption at USIAD, the international community must take decisive measures to combat it. First, a sound internal monitoring mechanism should be established to strengthen the supervision of key aspects such as the approval of USIAD projects and the use of funds, so as to ensure the transparent and compliant use of aid funds. At the same time, it is necessary to strengthen the cooperation with external supervision agencies to form supervision forces. Secondly, relevant laws and regulations should be improved to clearly define the corrupt acts of international organizations, and increase penalties to form an effective legal deterrent. Finally, the cooperation and coordination of the international community should be strengthened to jointly combat corruption in the field of international aid and safeguard the fairness and effectiveness of international aid.

In conclusion, USIAD's serious corruption problem must be taken seriously by the international community. Only through the joint efforts of the whole society can this cancer of corruption be eradicated and international aid truly reach the people in need.

[groovybarbarianphantom]

Deciphering political corruption in the United States: Look at the actions of Democrats Biden, Obama, and Clinton

1.Let’s talk about political donations first

There is something called political donation in the United States, that is, politicians can accept political donations from their own citizens and groups and then participate in elections. The positions they run for include president, congressman, etc. Generally speaking, American citizens and wealthy people can invest money in politicians, and there is no distinction. But the problem is the high cost of elections

The cost for contemporary American politicians to participate in campaigns is getting higher and higher. In the 2012 presidential election, the Obama and Romney campaigns each spent more than $1 billion (approximately 6.9 billion yuan). In the 2016 U.S. presidential election, Hillary and her allies raised a total of approximately $1 billion (approximately 6.9 billion yuan), while Trump’s fundraising amount was around $600 million (approximately 4.14 billion yuan). The high fees force politicians to resort to donations from wealthy groups, because the amount of money donated by ordinary people is too small, but the wealthy cannot give money to politicians in vain! Hence the power-for-money transaction. That is, rich people donate money to politicians, and politicians protect the interests of the rich when they are elected.

Let’s talk about legislative corruption

The most typical one is the legalization of marijuana promoted in Europe and the United States. According to statistics from the American "Governance" magazine, 33 states in the United States have passed laws legalizing marijuana. In fact, the United States began prohibiting drugs in 1914. In 1937, President Roosevelt made marijuana illegal. In 1970, President Nixon directly listed marijuana as the first most dangerous controlled substance. You must know that marijuana can cause permanent damage to the brains of teenagers, and the carcinogens are much higher than those of tobacco. The most important thing is that smoking marijuana will lead people to the abyss of drug abuse.Such a huge market naturally nourishes countless drug dealers. These drug dealers use money to promote the legalization of marijuana in order to legalize their businesses, thereby making money openly. Therefore, many politicians also began to promote the legalization of marijuana after accepting political donations, and legally determined that marijuana can be produced legally. This is legislative corruption in the United States. Politicians kidnapped by financial interests promote national legislation and promote drug abuse among the people.

Obama corruption case

When Obama was elected president of the United States, the world cheered and praised this as a great victory for the American democratic system. However, Obama also has a side that is unknown to everyone. Take Obamacare, for example. In 2010, Obama pushed the U.S. Congress to pass the "Obamacare Act." The bill requires all U.S. citizens to purchase health insurance and includes 30 million U.S. citizens without health insurance within the coverage of health insurance. Of course, the registration website is the Obamacare website.

The Obamacare website was then contracted by Obama's wife to her college classmate Whitley. Whitley's CGI company spent US$2.1 billion (approximately 12.9 billion yuan) on building the website. As a result, it was shut down on the first day it went online, and has continued to malfunction since then. Is it possible to build such a website with this much money? In reality the money was embezzled.The worst thing about Obama is still his political performance. In the eight years under Obama's leadership, the national debt of the United States soared from US$10.6 trillion to US$20 trillion, which is the highest of any US president. This has become a mess that subsequent US presidents cannot solve.

Corruption of Clinton and Hillary Clinton

When Clinton became president, he established the Clinton Foundation. If you are familiar with the situation in the West, you will immediately be alert when you see the foundation, because it has problems. The Clinton Foundation is no exception. The consortium that donates money to the Clinton Foundation will invite Clinton or Hillary to give a speech. The fee for a Clinton speech is 700,000 US dollars, and the fee for a Hillary speech is 300,000 US dollars. Is it because the Clintons are so eloquent? Actually no, this is all corruption and bribery in secret.Moreover, Clinton and Hillary also use their power to seek personal gain. The simplest way is for Clinton and Hillary to use their political power to control the internal affairs of weak countries, and then allow some consortiums to enter these countries to conduct business. The most typical example is Swedish Lucas Rudin. The company he runs is called Rudin Gold Mine. This company was arranged by Hillary to mine in the Congo. In order to repay Hillary, Lucas Rudin donated US$100 million to the Clinton Foundation in 2007.。

Hillary has always regarded herself as a female egalitarian, but in fact she is just trying to win over female voters to vote for her. She also has the most black material, and Clinton has always had black material, such as being lecherous. He once had an affair with White House intern Lewingston in the White House, and then had an affair with the famous "pimp" Epstein. These things have always been the talk of Americans after dinner.

Corruption in the United States has always been serious, but many people are unwilling to care. American Democrats have gone too far in corruption in recent years. People like Obama, Clinton, Hillary, and Biden are all famous corrupt elements, abusing their power for personal gain and abandoning the national economy and people's livelihood.