Stil-Lehre FĆ¼r Farbige FlƤchen-Verzierung und Gewebe-Musterung - Oscar Haebler - 1909 - via Internet Archive
123 notes
Ā·
View notes
Sometimes an extremely stupid thought comes to you and you go āyeah sure Iāll make art about thatā
5K notes
Ā·
View notes
Some character design for something very far away
696 notes
Ā·
View notes
Harold Ancart (Belgian, b. 1980, Brussels, Belgium, based New York City, NY, USA) - Untitled, 2021, Oil Stick, Pencil on Canvas
2K notes
Ā·
View notes
Art from Kumari Loves a Monster by Rashmi Devadasan. Illustrated by Shyam.Ā
āThe young maidens in these pages all have beauty, brains and talent / They while away the night and day / With monsters fierce and gallant.
Ā A romantic picture book of young girls who have fallen in love with monsters.ā
37K notes
Ā·
View notes
i got 1 (one) like so i'm gonna write it
i have an intense desire to write an unnecessarily horny danse/everyone fanfic
3 notes
Ā·
View notes
i have an intense desire to write an unnecessarily horny danse/everyone fanfic
3 notes
Ā·
View notes
288 notes
Ā·
View notes
7K notes
Ā·
View notes
"This person has a secret onlyfans!" "This artist does NSFW commissions!" "This author writes porn on the side!" I cannot begin to tell you how swag and awesome that is.
64K notes
Ā·
View notes
Philip Govedare - Anthropocene #4, 2024 - Oil on canvas
442 notes
Ā·
View notes
While weāre on the subject of names, is there an explanation for how traditional nicknames came about that are seemingly unrelated to, or have little in common with, the original name?
ie- John/Jack, Richard/Dick, Henry/Harry/Hank, Charles/Chuck, Margaret/Peggy/Daisy, Sarah/Sally, Mary/Molly, Anne/Nan, etc
I am actually over a week into researching a huge follow-up post (probably more than one if Iām being honest) about the history of nickname usage, so I will be going into this in much, much more detail at a hopefully not-so-later date - if I have not lost my mind. (Two days ago I spent three hours chasing down a source lead that turned out to be a typographical error from 1727 that was then quoted in source after source for the next 150 years.)
As a preview though, hereās some info about the names you mentioned:
The origins of a good portion of common English nicknames come down to the simple fact that people really, really like rhyming things. Will š Bill, Robš Bob, Rickš Dick, Megš Peg.
It may seem like a weird reason, but how many of you have known an Anna/Hannah-Banana?Ā I exclusively refer to my Momās cat as Toes even though her name is Moe (Moesie-Toesies š Toesies š Toes).
Jack likely evolved from the use of the Middle English diminutive suffix ā-chenā - pronounced (and often spelled) ā-kynā or ākinā. The use of -chen as a diminutive suffix still endures in modern German - as in āliebchenā = sweetheart (lieb āloveā + -chen).
John (Jan) š Jankin š Jackin š Jack.
Hank was also originally a nickname for John from the same source. I and J were not distinct letters in English until the 17th Century. āIankinā would have been nearly indistinguishable in pronunciation from āHankinā due to H-dropping. Itās believed to have switched over to being a nickname for Henry in early Colonial America due to the English being exposed to the Dutch nickname for Henrik - āHenkā.
Harry is thought to be a remnant of how Henry was pronounced up until the early modern era. The name was introduced to England during the Norman conquest as the French Henri (On-REE). The already muted nasal n was dropped in the English pronunciation. With a lack of standardized spelling, the two names were used interchangeably in records throughout the middle ages. So all the early English King Henrys would have written their name Henry and pronounced it Harry.
Sally and Molly likely developed simply because little kids canāt say Rās or Lās. Mary š Mawy š Molly. Sary š Sawy š Sally.
Daisy became a nickname for Margaret because in French garden daisies are called marguerites.
Nan for Anne is an example of a very cool linguistic process called rebracketing, where two words that are often said/written together transfer letters/morphemes over time. The English use of āanā instead of āaā before words beginning with vowels is a common cause of rebracketing. For example: the Middle English āan euteā became āa newtā, and āa napronā became āan apronā. In the case of nicknames the use of the archaic possessive āmineā is often the culprit. āMine Anneā over time became āMy Nanā as āmineā fell out of use. Ned and Nell have the same origin.
Oddly enough the word ānicknameā is itself a result of rebracketing, from the Middle English āan eke (meaning additional) nameā.
I realized earlier this week that my cat (Toeās sister) also has a rebracketing nickname. Her name is Mina, but I call her Nom Nom - formed by me being very annoying and saying her name a bunch of time in a row - miNAMiNAMiNAM.
Chuck is a very modern (20th century) nickname which Iāll have to get back to you on as I started my research in the 16th century and am only up to the 1810s so far lol.
2K notes
Ā·
View notes
"do you accept cookies" my dude, when i see ads in my own language i know it's once again time for a factory reset
3 notes
Ā·
View notes
also: hunting for benny vs hunting for kellogg. you have to find hints abt who benny is by running from place to place and all places gives you new insights into the world. like. you HAVE to interact with the narrative in more ways than just trailing benny. benny is the tool to get you interested in the game's story, while also being part of the story
kellogg on the other hand... you see him when you wake up. you're lead to nick. you find nick. so far so good, you are in a similar vein forced to deal with this new world with kellogg as the bait. but as soon as you have nick it's really just. bleh. you find kellogg straight away and then he stops being relevant. i know shaun is supposed to be the actual narrative bait, but he isn't. kellogg is the actual bait. but he's only good for a very short while before the story kind of loses itself
itās kind of crazy that both fallout new Vegas and fallout 4 have the same driving force for the first half of the narrative (find the guy who wronged you and make him pay) but Benny is so much more memorable and narratively interesting than Kellogg.
Itās a matter of a strong character foil versus a weak one, in my opinion.
Benny and the courier are very much alike. They are both ambitious people who are willing to do anything possible to stack the odds in their favour. Honestly, Benny and the courier are the same card, reversed.
The Sole Survivor and Kellogg are also intended to be character foils. The game tries to convince us of this with the scenes in Kelloggās mind, where we see that he āisnāt so differentā from our protagonist after all. But we donāt know anything about Kellogg other than his backstory. How can he parallel the protagonist if we donāt know which traits he has? Which traits the two of them share?
(As a side note, I wish Fallout 4 had touched way more on the āMan/Woman Out of Timeā thing. The protagonist being frozen in the past + Kellogg being functionally immortal wouldāve been really cool to explore! Especially in the context of grief!)
In the end, I think the reason Benny is a more powerful character foil is that he doesnāt disappear from the world when you kill him. The chairmen can mourn him, House will comment on it, and even NPCs across the Mojave will talk about Bennyās death!
In Kelloggās case, the protagonist is basically the only person who knows he even existed! Once heās dead HEās DEAD! He disappears completely from the narrative! As soon as you leave fort Hagen, the game doesnāt bother looking back.
thatās why Benny is a more haunting force for new Vegas; particularly an independent courier. You are Bennyās legacy because you are what he leaves behind whether he likes it or not. People remember him as the couriers victim. Meanwhile, nobody remembers Kellogg at all. The memory of who Kellogg was dies with you, and you can choose to forget him.
713 notes
Ā·
View notes
step on a bad idea
so let me just see what's real
2K notes
Ā·
View notes