hypothesenuts

[hypothesenuts]

compaired the another ref proportions and the lengths are the same and as for the curves the scale wasnt that far off so im gonna stick w the proko model very intresring what the arc changes can do

trying to be more structured this time around and pulling from more resources when studying anatomy, and one predicament i came across right now is in the proko videos he says the lumbar is 1.25 in ratio and the sacrum is 0.75 of that but then i measure his drawing it was equal to 1 unit and i checked other drawings but the lumbar seems to be much smaller than the 1 unit so now idk what to do cuz idk any other older books i can pull from for information abt that but also i think i might be over complicating this since its not really seen and should just follow the proportion given.....

im doing this on paper using an 8in book and it would have been nice to know ahead of time to have 5 sections instead.... i was going to to 2 in each section but now i have to do 1.5in each section which is gonna complicate the math for me -_-' i guess ill stick w 1in each section...

[hypothesenuts]

my studies today found that the proko model has more curvy arcs than in 2 other refferences i used and that the disks r more exaggerated on iy so the spacing is a bit different but they all hae the same proportions

also the width of the column is the height of the cervical but that was just on the prokko model i have to check the others since theyre more compressed

trying to be more structured this time around and pulling from more resources when studying anatomy, and one predicament i came across right now is in the proko videos he says the lumbar is 1.25 in ratio and the sacrum is 0.75 of that but then i measure his drawing it was equal to 1 unit and i checked other drawings but the lumbar seems to be much smaller than the 1 unit so now idk what to do cuz idk any other older books i can pull from for information abt that but also i think i might be over complicating this since its not really seen and should just follow the proportion given.....

im doing this on paper using an 8in book and it would have been nice to know ahead of time to have 5 sections instead.... i was going to to 2 in each section but now i have to do 1.5in each section which is gonna complicate the math for me -_-' i guess ill stick w 1in each section...

[hypothesenuts]

trying to be more structured this time around and pulling from more resources when studying anatomy, and one predicament i came across right now is in the proko videos he says the lumbar is 1.25 in ratio and the sacrum is 0.75 of that but then i measure his drawing it was equal to 1 unit and i checked other drawings but the lumbar seems to be much smaller than the 1 unit so now idk what to do cuz idk any other older books i can pull from for information abt that but also i think i might be over complicating this since its not really seen and should just follow the proportion given.....

im doing this on paper using an 8in book and it would have been nice to know ahead of time to have 5 sections instead.... i was going to to 2 in each section but now i have to do 1.5in each section which is gonna complicate the math for me -_-' i guess ill stick w 1in each section...

[hypothesenuts]

one day i will figure out how to keep the proportion of box while roating it in perspective..the dream still lives on.

speaking of which the other day i thought about making a video abt the intersectionality of math in art and i was like haha but i dont think could and tossed the idea but then i rememebered this blog and now im -_-

[hypothesenuts]

i should probably write abt my findings abt my computer repair here tbh

so rn i need to get permission to access my old harddrive user file 🥴 but i am the permission.... I have been told about that i should look into "ownership" which upon first glance seems like the correct name for the topic. deff dont want to miss anything here so i'm glad im able to get this info

[hypothesenuts]

I just realized most of the math I've ever learned has been really....statitical which is y I see ppl kinda don't see the point in it cuz like when am I going to ever need to know the trout population grwth in Wyoming or whatever 🧍‍♀️

I hope I can figure out a way to find more visual approaches and applications to algebra besides like graphs. I'm p sure there r some and I hope when I get thru thia class I can have a more visual understand of algebra and maybe make something w it😅

[hypothesenuts]

Y’ever read something and have understanding that has eluded you interminably suddenly stop, curl up, and snuggle neatly into a fold in your brain because a new way way opened to it?

[hypothesenuts]

Y’ever read something and have understanding that has eluded you interminably suddenly stop, curl up, and snuggle neatly into a fold in your brain because a new way way opened to it?

[hypothesenuts]

Oh intreating apparently there is a spaced repetition curve that's visual

[hypothesenuts]

Learning about the coords of 30° and 60° and this is intense I wish I had more time to write a post to rlwrap my head around it but I really shouldn't

[hypothesenuts]

Finding the cosine makes no sense by itself cuz u can only find it via the interception of sine hence COsine

[hypothesenuts]

Circle arcs

S=angle × radius

Cuz is fanned out and there are x amnt of arcs compounded next to each other

So if angle is 9 and and radius is 1 there r 9 fanned out arcs

Angle=9 radius=2

The arc is larger cuz the qty of fans is the same but now the smaller arcs amnt to a larger number so it's 18

Angle = arc/radius

Since the radius = the arc in a radian, now it's about how many times the radius can wrap around the arc in a given sector

S=4 r=2

Radius can go inside the section 2 times

S=3 r=2

Radius can go Into arc 1.5 times and the other half will be sticking out (idk y tf i was having a hard time drawing thia out maybe its late oop)

This also kind of comes I to play w the formula of the radian (circumference/radius) that's the ratio of circumference and also is not written anywhere for some reason even tho it's derived from like ???? So instead of circumference it's now just a section of the arc which the s makes more sense there....