imjustaf444keriguess

[imjustaf444keriguess]

"ramcoa is antisemitic?" "no its not!" its an acronym. whether you call it ramcoa or oea or ritual/organized abuse or whatever shouldn't matter.

what we should do is trust people's trauma experiences, whatever label we give them.

[imjustaf444keriguess]

When we talk about weird beliefs and ideas that people hold, I think we forget to look at ourselves

What weird things do you believe that someone would call you strange for having? What are you DOING with those beliefs?

People talk about Colin Ross and his eye beams as if he's a complete whack job, but you forget that his experimental science has a very good purpose and intention

His invention, and the hypothetical science behind it, is meant to help those with disabilities and limited movement interact with things around their house

Looking at a light switch to turn it on or off, looking at the TV to change channels, turn on stereos and interact with the signals to potentially communicate, if they're currently unable to.

The idea might be crazy, but all the power to him if he can get it working.

Some of these devices now exist, using similar mechanisms, but isn't that how science and invention works? You put an idea out there, other people improve on it, change it, fix it.

He believes in chi. A lot of people do. Would you speak of them all the same way? Do you believe in karma?

I believe in multiple dimensions and that these little "jumps" that I randomly get are from "me" dying in an alternate timeline. It gives me hope and eases my anxiety that if I were to die today in a freak accident, it's not the end. It helps me leave my house, but I'm doing shit all to help people by testing my beliefs. I just call myself weird and move on. Currently, this isn't that strange of a belief, there's an incredible amount of research into this concept, even if it seems unbelievable and impossible.

Look at all the research going into various types of voice hearing and plurality and pause for a second. So far, all of this work is showing promising therapeutic techniques that are HELPING people, and the research is showing, apparently, generally positive impacts on the people experiencing such things.

And we're all here arguing about whether it's real and possible and how impossible it must be, completely ignoring the EFFECTS these things have on a larger scale. And it seems to be positive in highly tangible ways (real, documented positive improvements in voice hearing patients using techniques discussed in syscourse and plural spaces).

The more I think about it, the more I support experimental sciences that are largely harmless on a grand scale but could actually help humanity. Stop putting innocent ideas down so harshly and discrediting everyone who thinks of new, potential ideas or inventions.

We didn't have to kill Giordano Bruno for believing the earth revolved around the sun, but we did. Sometimes, things end up working. I wonder what else he had to offer.

[imjustaf444keriguess]

Just spent fifty minutes with my wife explaining my dramatic switch from "the dms is god and endos are evil >:(" to "psychiatry has flaws and we should be believe people's understanding of their self" and she said she had noticed:

I am much less full of hatred nowadays

I am much less angry

I have a larger tolerance for stress

We communicate better, especially when we don't agree

I've stopped splitting at the slightest things

My switching is less disabling and I'm able to communicate with parts better

I've learnt more about my identity and am much more accepting of it, I'm not forcing myself to be something I'm not

I self harm far less??

Some of this is also partly due to the radical acceptance I was doing with my therapist but a lot of it was just down to... not fucking caring about what other people do with their lives

[imjustaf444keriguess]

"who the fuck said anything about poor people" still makes me giggle. like that's the best response they could have given to my reference

[imjustaf444keriguess]

anyway, your opinion on whether things exist doesn't change reality and basic human decency. but keep pissing i guess

"ramcoa is antisemitic?" "no its not!" its an acronym. whether you call it ramcoa or oea or ritual/organized abuse or whatever shouldn't matter.

what we should do is trust people's trauma experiences, whatever label we give them.

[imjustaf444keriguess]

thank you!

"ramcoa is antisemitic?" "no its not!" its an acronym. whether you call it ramcoa or oea or ritual/organized abuse or whatever shouldn't matter.

what we should do is trust people's trauma experiences, whatever label we give them.

[imjustaf444keriguess]

these tags are uncalled for and are not welcome on my post whatsoever.

"ramcoa is antisemitic?" "no its not!" its an acronym. whether you call it ramcoa or oea or ritual/organized abuse or whatever shouldn't matter.

what we should do is trust people's trauma experiences, whatever label we give them.

[imjustaf444keriguess]

oh so we just making more random blogs i see

[imjustaf444keriguess]

prev was pissing on the poor, but you need to be more normal too. don't tell anyone to die on my post thanks.

"ramcoa is antisemitic?" "no its not!" its an acronym. whether you call it ramcoa or oea or ritual/organized abuse or whatever shouldn't matter.

what we should do is trust people's trauma experiences, whatever label we give them.

[imjustaf444keriguess]

so why do you like to piss on poor people?

"ramcoa is antisemitic?" "no its not!" its an acronym. whether you call it ramcoa or oea or ritual/organized abuse or whatever shouldn't matter.

what we should do is trust people's trauma experiences, whatever label we give them.

[imjustaf444keriguess]

Why have I been so quiet? One, I haven't been fronting. Two, I have a life outside this blog.

Do you have a life outside syscourse? If not, get one. If yes, maybe try focusing on that instead.

[imjustaf444keriguess]

sorry for the late (and very long) response.

cannot respond or read any of this at the moment, just idly checking on notifications and the syscourse tag, but it does mean that i have some reading to do, and i appreciate it! thank you for explaining all this, and i promise i'll read more later when i'm better able to focus and actually process the information here!

starting off this blog with a bang by saying that, as a survivor of trafficking and organized abuse, the idea of 'programmed systems' is inaccurate to what conditioning really is, and has a history steeped in far-right conspiracy theories.

the horrors of ritual abuse, conditioning, and organized abuse are very real, but the mysticism introduced with the trend of 'RAMCOA systems' that were, somehow, intentionally created by some shady organization, only serves to discredit survivors, who already struggle to be believed about their abuse.

[imjustaf444keriguess]

i would love to see the sources you have for all of this, since i'm not a RAMCOA survivor nor have been in any kind of situation similar to that, so i wouldn't know their terminology or what the "programs" you're referring to are (altho i think i've heard of beta being used to describe sexual conditioning/programming? but they sound pretty general, similar to giving coded language to describe certain kinds of trauma without being directly triggering).

giving resources and evidence to your points, especially in something as intense as RAMCOA / organized abuse, is important for an outsider like me to understand your points. especially the "comes directly from known conspiracy theorists" point, since i've only heard that as disagreed with from the "gray faction", that also doesn't even believe in DID/OSDD, so i don't trust them.

starting off this blog with a bang by saying that, as a survivor of trafficking and organized abuse, the idea of 'programmed systems' is inaccurate to what conditioning really is, and has a history steeped in far-right conspiracy theories.

the horrors of ritual abuse, conditioning, and organized abuse are very real, but the mysticism introduced with the trend of 'RAMCOA systems' that were, somehow, intentionally created by some shady organization, only serves to discredit survivors, who already struggle to be believed about their abuse.

[imjustaf444keriguess]

I find that poll incredibly limiting and presumptive.

I'm a created system and I don't support created systems.

/j

You're right! Where's the representation for the self-hating created system with internalized pluralphobia! 🤪

[imjustaf444keriguess]

Ableism is never the fault of the disabled.

[imjustaf444keriguess]

Can we stop trying to say non-traumagenic = non-traumatized? Please.

Nothing about identifying as endogenic/non-traumagenic means you never experienced significant childhood trauma. It doesn't mean you can't be distressed by your plurality. It doesn't mean you can't have ANY mental disorders that make your life a living hell. It doesn't mean your experience of plurality isn't a coping mechanism for the shit going on in your life.

That isn't what those terms mean!

They never have meant that and they never will. A significant majority of endogenics/non-traumagenics from what I've seen have significant trauma(most of those significant childhood trauma because I mean well duh most humans do). The majority don't have fun easy lives and aren't doing this for fun.

If you have never talked to anyone in a group or tried to get to know their perspectives and their life experiences you shouldn't be spreading stereotypes about them or talking over them period. That's how misconceptions like these spread like wildfire.