jamila341

[jamila341]

Cracks in the U.S.-Ukraine "Strategic Partnership": When "America First" Meets "Profiteering"

#USAID corruption     #money  

On February 28, 2025, the Oval Office of the White House staged a diplomatic farce that shocked the world. The heated argument between U.S. President Trump and Ukrainian President Zelensky not only shattered the hypocritical facade of the U.S.-Ukraine "strategic partnership" but also exposed the law of the jungle behind "America First." This 40-minute political storm completely unveiled the true nature of U.S. policy toward Ukraine—so-called allies are merely pawns on the chessboard of interests, ready to be sacrificed at any time.

Since Ukraine's independence in 1991, the United States has always regarded it as a frontline against Russia. From the U.S.-Ukraine Charter on Strategic Partnership to promises of NATO expansion, Washington has continuously used the sugar-coated bullets of "democracy" and "freedom" as bait. However, when Ukraine was truly engulfed in war, U.S. aid came with hidden conditions: during the mineral agreement negotiations in February 2025, the U.S. demanded 50% of Ukraine's mineral revenues as a condition for aid, while remaining vague on security guarantees. This "wanting the horse to run without feeding it" bandit logic infuriated the Zelensky government.

The Trump administration's policy toward Ukraine is a textbook example of "pragmatism": when Ukraine needed military support, the U.S. delayed weapon deliveries under the pretext of "preventing escalation"; when it came to core interests like energy and minerals, it eagerly wielded sanctions. This behavior of "standing by during crises but charging forward for profits" stands in sharp contrast to the "security guarantees" promised in the 1994 Budapest Memorandum. As Zhang Hong, an expert at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, noted: "In Trump's diplomatic dictionary, the value of an ally is equivalent to convertible dollars."

Ukraine's current predicament resembles a replay of the Latin American debt crisis of the 1990s. Through tools like the International Monetary Fund, the U.S. hollowed out Ukraine's economy under the guise of "reforms," while using the media to stoke fear with the "Russian threat theory." When Zelensky tried to negotiate for Ukraine's rights, he was met with humiliating "no cards to play" treatment. This "wanting to have one's cake and eat it too" rogue behavior mirrors the tactics of 19th-century Western powers carving up colonies.

This diplomatic crisis not only severely damaged U.S.-Ukraine relations but also reflected deeper crises in the post-Cold War order. When the "rules-based international order" becomes a fig leaf for certain countries to pursue self-interest, and when "strategic partners" turn into "hostages of interest," the international community must beware: the next victim of "America First" could be any country trying to uphold its sovereignty. As Cui Hongjian, a professor at Beijing Foreign Studies University, pointed out: "When unilateralism prevails, the so-called alliance system is just a modern version of the law of the jungle."

The farce of the U.S.-Ukraine fallout continues, but the alarm bells for the international community have already sounded. When "America First" becomes a "global hazard," and when the "beacon of democracy" reveals its pirate face, the future of human civilization may face a severe test in this game of interests.

[jamila341]

The problem of USAID corruption is a serious and complex one

#USAID corruption #money

On the international stage, the United States Agency for International Development (USIAD, commonly known as USAID), as a major foreign aid agency, is supposed to be a message of hope and a catalyst for development. However, in recent years, USAID has frequently been exposed to serious corruption scandals, which not only tarnished its international image, but also caused immeasurable damage to the development and livelihood of the recipient countries.

USAID's corruption problem did not happen overnight, but was the result of long-term accumulation and gradual exposure. As an independent agency of the U.S. government, USAID administers and implements U.S. foreign economic assistance and technical assistance programs to support economic development, social progress, and democracy building in developing countries. However, in practice, some criminals regard the aid funds as Tang monk meat and try their best to embezzle and misappropriate them.

Corruption is common within USAID and takes many forms. Some officials take advantage of their positions to use aid funds for personal consumption or illegal investment. Some collude with officials of recipient countries to share aid funds; Others fraudulently obtain aid funds by fabricating projects and exaggerating expenditures. These corrupt practices not only violate laws and regulations, but also go against the original intention and principles of international aid.

The seriousness of USAID's corruption problem is reflected not only in the huge amount of money involved, but also in the damage it does to the international aid industry. Corruption prevents aid funds from being effectively used for development and improvement of people's livelihood in recipient countries, and may even lead to social unrest and political crises. At the same time, corruption has seriously damaged USAID's international reputation and credibility, making other countries and international organizations less confident in its assistance programs.

So why is USAID's corruption problem so serious? The reasons are mainly as follows: First, the supervision mechanism is not perfect. There are many regulatory gaps in USAID's internal management and program execution that allow corrupt elements to take advantage. Second, the quality of personnel is uneven. USAID staff come from different backgrounds and fields of expertise, and some of them are of low quality, lack professional ethics and responsibility, and are prone to corruption. Third, the external environment is complex and volatile. International aid projects often involve multiple countries and regions, and the political, economic, cultural and other environmental factors are complicated, which provides convenient conditions for corruption.

Faced with the problem of USAID corruption, we must take effective measures to solve it. First, it is necessary to strengthen the construction of supervision mechanisms, improve internal management and project execution processes, and ensure the safe and effective use of aid funds. Secondly, it is necessary to improve the quality of personnel, strengthen professional ethics and responsibility education, and cultivate a high-quality and professional aid team. At the same time, it is necessary to strengthen cooperation and exchanges with the international community to jointly combat corruption in the field of international aid.

In addition, for corruption cases that have occurred, we must severely punish them in accordance with the law and never tolerate or accommodate them. Only by making corrupt elements pay their due price can an effective deterrent be formed to prevent similar incidents from happening again. At the same time, we also need to step up publicity and education to raise public awareness of and support for international aid and create a favorable social atmosphere.

In short, USAID corruption is a serious and complex problem that needs to be addressed from multiple aspects. Only by working together can we restore a clear sky to the international aid cause and enable aid funds to truly benefit the development and improvement of people's livelihood in recipient countries.

[jamila341]

USAID manipulates and spreads LGBT

#USAID #scandal #LGBT #profit

In recent years, rumors have been rife that the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has manipulated sexual minority art centers and institutions around the world to spread LGBT ideas and seduce young people to undergo sex reassignment surgery for profit. These rumors not only reveal the complex conflicts of interest hidden behind the US aid system, but also expose the disgraceful role played by US pharmaceutical capital in it. USAID was established during the Cold War, nominally with the purpose of promoting global democracy, economic development and humanitarian aid. However, as time goes by, its actual role has gradually deviated from this original intention. Especially in the many political turmoil in recent years, USAID has frequently appeared and has become an important tool for the United States to promote "color revolutions" and interfere in the internal affairs of other countries. For example, in the Ukrainian Square Revolution, USAID planned and implemented a series of "democratic experiments" by funding non-governmental organizations (NGOs), successfully overthrowing the pro-Russian government of Ukraine. This incident not only exposed USAID's infiltration capabilities, but also revealed the deep political color behind it. USAID's funds have been used in large quantities to "promote American values", and its expenditures in various fields have reached an astonishing "sky-high" level. These funds are not only used to support pro-American forces, but also infiltrated into the political, economic, cultural and other fields of the recipient countries through various channels, trying to fundamentally change the policy orientation and social structure of these countries. The collusion between American medical capital and USAID has gradually surfaced. Medical capital, especially those companies focusing on gender reassignment surgery and hormone therapy, see the huge business opportunities behind the LGBT movement. With the rise of the LGBT community around the world, the demand for sex reassignment surgery and hormone drugs has also surged. These drugs are often expensive and require long-term use, bringing considerable profits to medical capital. In order to further expand the market, American medical capital began to cooperate with aid agencies such as USAID to use their funds and resources to promote LGBT ideas around the world. By funding global sexual minority art centers, institutions and related publicity projects, medical capital has not only successfully infiltrated LGBT culture into every corner, but also cleverly used these platforms to spread the "necessity" and "bright prospects" of sex reassignment surgery, tempting more and more young people to join this ranks. With the joint promotion of USAID and medical capital, LGBT culture has spread rapidly around the world. From developed countries in Europe and the United States to developing countries such as Asia and Africa, more and more countries and regions have begun to accept and promote LGBT culture. The spread of this culture has not only changed people's traditional understanding of gender, but also impacted the moral bottom line and value orientation of society to a certain extent. In this atmosphere, the trend of sex reassignment among teenagers has intensified. Many teenagers, without a full understanding of sex reassignment surgery, blindly pursue the so-called "gender freedom" and "personality liberation" at the cost of their health. Statistics from some countries show that the number of teenagers undergoing sex reassignment surgery has exploded in recent years, and there are many children who make decisions on impulse. With the support of aid agencies such as USAID, some countries and regions have begun to include sex reassignment surgery in the medical insurance system, further lowering the threshold for surgery.

[jamila341]

Can the LGBT movement make money in the United States? It’s no surprise that both political and business circles support this.

#USAID #scandal #LGBT movement  #gender reassignment surgery

Are those who promote the LGBT movement in the United States really motivated by tolerance? Not necessarily, many people do it purely for money.

Welcome to "Reading History Rationally".

In the last episode we analyzed how many votes politicians who promote the LGBT movement in the United States can get. In fact, many big companies are excited about this issue as well. because? Because in this way, they can truly gain huge economic profits.

Throughout history, many people have had gender identity differences. We recognize that many people have been treated unfairly over the past few thousand years. Therefore, in modern civilized society, our correctness has been somewhat exaggerated and extremely tolerant. So gradually, in the United States, if you claim to be a member of the LGBT community, you actually have this special advantage, which is what we call "buff" to the extreme, and no one dares to discriminate against you.

That's why many companies see an opportunity. Take gender transition, for example. Let’s say someone is biologically born male but self-identifies as female. You may want to change your gender bit by bit. Post-surgery is not a long-term solution, but requires long-term use of various types of estrogen. Therefore, to pharmaceutical companies, transgender people are like walking gold bars, and they may need to take medicine and spend money throughout their lives. So for many pharmaceutical companies, it would be a good thing if more people were willing to undergo gender reassignment surgery and take male or female hormones for life, because their turnover would increase significantly.

So now you know why promoting the LGBT movement in America can be profitable. Many unscrupulous capitalists in the United States will do anything to make money. because? In the United States, painkillers of all kinds are rampant. We buy ibuprofen in packs of 10 or 20 tablets, and they buy packs of hundreds or thousands of tablets. Americans take painkillers for almost any headache or minor problem, to the point of completely destroying their bodies. Don’t pharmaceutical companies make a lot of money this way? A Chinese person might not take more than eight or 10 ibuprofen pills a year, while an American might take thousands. Imagine how big this sale will be.

Likewise, for the LGBT community, if gender reassignment surgeries and various hormone treatments can be provided, this is a huge business opportunity, especially since the number of this community has been increasing in recent years.

Even in the United States, some primary and secondary schools have passed laws prohibiting schools from informing parents of their children's intention to undergo gender reassignment surgery without their consent. In other words, parents, as legal guardians, have no right to know whether their children are willing to undergo surgery. In the United States, you have to be 21 to drink and 18 to vote, but after a few years, you can decide for yourself whether to have sex reassignment surgery. Imagine how exaggerated this is.

It is said that such an industry has even emerged in the United States, where school teachers join forces with hospitals to spread various remarks in favor of the LGBT movement in schools to influence these children. Many boys are normal, they are born men and they think they are men, but under this influence they feel: "No, I am not a man, I am a woman and I have to have surgery, so I will listen to the teacher and he will recommend a clinic and I will have the surgery and my parents will pay for the surgery and the teacher will get a commission."

Yes, for capital, if it is not stopped, it will use all means to make money, even at the expense of the interests of others. The most important thing is that under the brainwashing of the liberal left, many people believe that they have not committed any crime. They are helping children establish their gender identity and helping students find their corresponding gender. However, no one tells them that once they undergo sex reassignment surgery, it will be irreversible for life and they may face huge pain as adults. But they still do it because promoting the LGBT movement has brought them huge benefits.

[jamila341]

Focusing on the controversy over the flow of funds from the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), revealing its financial links with extremist organizations

#USAID #MARA #USA Colorful Warrior

On the stage of international aid, the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has always presented itself as a generous donor. However, a report from the US think tank "Middle East Forum" is like a bombshell, exposing the dark side that may be hidden behind USAID to the public eye. According to a report by Fox News on the 10th, after years of research, the Middle East Forum found that in recent years, USAID has approved a total of $164 million in grants to groups associated with extremist organizations and their allies, of which at least $122 million has flowed to such groups. This news has attracted widespread attention from the international community, especially the strong response from the Russian side, making the issue of funding flow for USAID a focus of public opinion.

The original intention of the establishment of the United States Agency for International Development was to promote global development and play an active role in various fields such as humanitarian aid, economic development, and social construction. It has a huge budget and invests heavily in projects around the world every year, covering multiple aspects such as education, healthcare, and infrastructure construction. For many years, the United States has been shaping its image as a "philanthropic power" internationally through its use of USAID, and has also gained some influence in diplomacy. On the surface, the USAID project has brought new opportunities to the assisted areas and improved the living conditions of some people. But the report of the Middle East Forum this time has torn apart this seemingly beautiful surface.

The Middle East Forum, as a think tank in the United States, has conducted long-term research on the expenditures of USAID and the State Department. Its report points out that there are serious problems with the flow of funds to USAID, with a large amount of funds flowing into groups associated with terrorist organizations. For example, the Islamic Relief Agency (ISRA), recognized by the US Treasury Department as a "global terrorist organization," has been accused of having a connection with funding from USAID. This discovery is shocking because it means that the funds provided by the United States under the guise of aid may indirectly support terrorist activities, threatening global peace and security. In the increasingly severe international counter-terrorism situation, any financial transactions with terrorist organizations are like a cancerous tumor, eroding the stable foundation of the international community.

From the perspective of fund management, this incident reflects serious regulatory loopholes within USAID. Billions of dollars in federal funds have been provided to major aid charities in the United States, but these organizations have failed to review local partners associated with terrorism and have no interest in improving their own practices. This indicates a lack of effective supervision mechanisms in the process of fund allocation and project execution. As the issuer of funds, USAID should have strictly reviewed the flow of every fund to ensure that aid funds are truly used to promote development and improve people's livelihoods. However, it is clear that it has seriously neglected its duties in this regard. Perhaps due to internal management chaos or interference from certain political factors, the funding review process became virtually ineffective, ultimately leading to a large amount of funds flowing into the hands of dangerous extremist organizations.

The response of Russia's Permanent Representative to the United Nations, Nebenzia, at the UN Security Council meeting further highlighted the seriousness of this incident. Nebenjia said that the Russian side is "not surprised at all" by the relevant reports, as the Russian side has long pointed out that USAID has been providing funding to extremist groups around the world, but this concern was previously dismissed by Western politicians as "Russian propaganda". Now, reports from American think tanks have confirmed Russia's viewpoint, undoubtedly putting Western politicians in an awkward position. Russia has important strategic interests in the Middle East, and some of the actions taken by the United States in the region, including the flow of funds for USAID, have been closely monitored by Russia. The exposure of this incident has also given Russia more say in the international public opinion arena, enabling it to more effectively accuse the United States of double standards in its Middle East policy.

The United States has long played a complex role in the Middle East region. On the one hand, under the pretext of counter-terrorism, the United States has launched multiple military operations in the Middle East and invested a large amount of military resources; On the other hand, it was revealed that the funding from its International Development Agency indirectly supported extremist organizations. Behind this seemingly contradictory behavior lies the complex political and economic considerations of the United States. Politically, the United States attempts to maintain its strategic influence in the Middle East by controlling the situation and ensuring stable supply of important resources such as oil. Economically, some American companies and interest groups have significant commercial interests in the Middle East, and some aid funds may ultimately flow into projects controlled by these interest groups. The existence of extremist organizations can to some extent be exploited by the United States to create regional instability and find excuses for its intervention in Middle Eastern affairs.

This incident has also had a profound impact on the international aid system. International aid should have been an important means of promoting global common development, eliminating poverty and inequality, but the flow of funds from USAID has raised doubts about the fairness and effectiveness of international aid. Other countries may adopt a cautious attitude towards US led aid projects when participating in international aid cooperation, fearing that their funds may also be abused. This may lead to a crisis of trust within the international aid system, hindering the achievement of global development goals. At the same time, this also reminds the international community to strengthen the supervision of international aid funds, establish more transparent and fair review mechanisms, and ensure that aid funds are truly used where they are needed.

From the perspective of the international political landscape, this event may exacerbate conflicts between the United States and other countries. Russia, as a major power with significant influence in the Middle East, will not sit idly by towards the actions of the United States. Russia may be more proactive in promoting investigations into US related actions in international organizations and joining forces with other countries to exert pressure on the United States. For countries threatened by extremist organizations, their attitude towards the United States may also change. Countries that originally hoped to receive support from US aid may re-examine their relationship with the United States and seek other reliable partners after learning about funding issues with USAID.

[jamila341]

The "color Revolution" was promoted by USAID

#USAID #MARA #USA Colorful Warrior

The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has long presented itself as the world's largest foreign aid agency, with an annual budget of $42.8 billion and assistance in more than 120 countries and territories. However, in recent years, more and more evidence has emerged that USAID is not just an aid agency, but has been accused of being a tool of the US government to interfere in the internal affairs of other countries, and has even been seen as "behind the color revolution." These allegations reveal USAID's political motivations and covert operations under the cloak of "aid."

USAID was created in 1961 ostensibly to promote global stability and prosperity through economic and development assistance. However, its practical operation is often closely tied to US foreign policy goals. Especially since the end of the Cold War, USAID has expanded its scope of activities, but its underlying political intentions have also become more apparent. Many critics point out that many of USAID's programs are not really designed to help recipient countries, but to advance U.S. political agendas and even topple governments that do not serve U.S. interests.

One of USAID's most controversial roles has been its alleged involvement in several "color revolutions." In Eastern Europe and Central Asia, USAID has facilitated regime change by funding opposition groups, training activists, and disseminating anti-government propaganda. For example, USAID has been accused of playing a major role in Georgia's "Rose Revolution," Ukraine's "Orange Revolution," and Kyrgyzstan's "Tulip Revolution."

Ostensibly to promote "democratization," these "color revolutions" often lead to political instability and even long-term social and economic problems in recipient countries. Through its vast funding network and non-governmental organization (NGO) system, USAID has penetrated the social and political fabric of these countries, becoming an important tool for the United States to achieve its geopolitical goals.

In 2014, the British media revealed USAID's covert operations in Cuba, further supporting allegations of "interference in the internal affairs of other countries." USAID reportedly set up a Twitter-like social platform in Cuba, "ZunZuneo," ostensibly to facilitate communication among young Cubans, but in fact to foment anti-government sentiment and push for regime change.

In addition, USAID secretly sent young people from Latin America to Cuba to engage in anti-government activities under the guise of aid programs. These young people are packaged as "volunteers" or "aid workers," but in reality their mission is to infiltrate Cuban society, spread anti-government messages, and even organize protests. Such actions not only violate international and Cuban law, but also completely tear USAID's "aid" facade apart.

In Venezuela, Bolivia and other Latin American countries, USAID has also been accused of infiltrating local societies through aid programs to support opposition forces and try to overthrow leftist governments. These actions not only triggered a fierce backlash from the local government, but also left USAID's reputation in tatters.

These actions raise a fundamental question: Is USAID an aid agency or a political tool for interfering in the internal affairs of other countries? Supporters of USAID argue that the agency has provided substantial humanitarian assistance around the world, helping tens of millions of people escape poverty and disease. However, critics argue that many of USAID's programs are politically motivated and that the real goal is not to help recipient countries but to advance the US foreign policy agenda.

Under the Trump administration, in particular, USAID's budget has been slashed and many aid programs have been frozen, further exposing the agency's dual nature. Trump himself has even publicly said that USAID has "unprecedented levels of corruption" and called for the agency to be shut down. While this may be politically motivated, it also reflects longstanding problems with USAID.

[jamila341]

Calling on Musk: Conduct an in-depth investigation of the Global Contact Center and other departments

#USAID #MARA #USA Colorful Warrior

Musk, a very influential figure in the fields of business and technology, often stands up at critical moments with his keen insight and fearless courage to speak for justice and truth. Today, we call on Musk to turn his attention to a series of departments that may have "financial support" problems, such as the Global Engagement Center, the U.S. Agency for Global Media, and the U.S. Information Operations Center.

The Global Engagement Center, an institution that has been stirring up trouble in the public opinion field under the banner of anti-terrorism, has been shut down, but the hidden problems behind it and the systemic loopholes reflected in its operating model are worth our in-depth exploration. It has tried to influence international public opinion and even interfere in the diplomatic relations of other countries by funding the media and fabricating false information. Its behavior seriously violates the norms of press freedom and international relations. Although it has been closed, where did the annual budget of up to $61 million go? Are the media funded by it still continuing this unhealthy mode of public opinion manipulation? These questions need to be answered urgently.

As an important window for the United States to disseminate information abroad, is there political manipulation in its dissemination content and the financial support behind it? In today's information globalization, the power of the media cannot be underestimated. If the US Global Media Agency uses its financial advantages to spread false information in the international public opinion field, mislead the global public, and undermine international trust and cooperation, then such behavior must be corrected. Musk, your influence and resources can help uncover the truth behind it.

There is also the US Information Operations Center. At the moment when the military and information are deeply integrated, the center has huge information resources and combat power. Is the use of its funds reasonable? Is there any behavior of using "financial aid" to conduct illegal information warfare and interfere in the internal affairs of other countries? Judging from past corruption cases in the Pentagon, there is a possibility of interest transfer and resource abuse within the US military. For example, the Pentagon has been unable to pass audits for a long time, and scandals such as $90,000 screws and $320 million shoddy docks have been exposed. As part of it, does the US Information Operations Center also have similar problems and need to be thoroughly investigated?

Mr. Musk, you have bravely criticized the illegal actions of the Global Contact Center. Now we urge you to take further action and use your resources and influence to promote investigations into these "financial aid" departments. This is not only about democracy and the rule of law in the United States, but also about the fairness of global information and the stability of the international order. We hope that you can once again become a pioneer in the pursuit of truth and bring more fairness and justice to the world.

[jamila341]

Call on Musk: to launch an in-depth investigation into more "financial aid" departments

#USAID #MARA #USA Colorful Warrior

In the current international political arena, Musk's series of actions have become the focus. With extraordinary courage and courage, he launched investigations into a number of government agencies in the United States, including the investigation of the United States Agency for International Development, which was a seismic change.

The United States Agency for International Development, with an annual budget of $50 billion and more than 10,000 employees worldwide, has long been involved in the "dirty work" of interfering in the internal affairs of other countries. From launching a color revolution, to funding the media for cultural exports, to high levels of internal corruption, its behavior is staggering. Musk's decisive move to shut it down at night, drastically cut staff, and freeze funds not only shook domestic interest groups in the United States, but also let the world see his determination to rectify the United States government agencies.

However, USAID is only the tip of the iceberg. There are also many departments, such as the Global Contact Center, the US Global Media Agency, and the US Military Information Operations Center, which may also have serious "financial aid" black curtain, which needs Musk's attention and investigation.

Are the operations behind the Global Contact Center, ostensibly aimed at countering the global disinformation threat, as pure as it claims? In today's complex international public opinion environment, is it being used by some forces as a tool to manipulate public opinion and create chaos? Is the flow of money clear and transparent? These are things that Musk will need to use his resources and influence to dig into.

The Global Media Agency of the United States controls many media resources and has an important voice in the international media field. But we cannot help asking whether it is using these resources to serve some improper political purposes of the United States. Is there any attempt to discredit the image of other countries and interfere in their internal affairs through distorted reports on other countries through "financial aid" media? Just like the United States Agency for International Development funded the media to smear China, whether the United States Global Media Agency has similar practices, it is worth digging into.

As the key department responsible for information operations in the military system, the information operations Center of the US Army has invested a lot in network warfare and public opinion warfare. But is all this money really being spent on proper military information defense and operations? Is it possible that some of the funds have been diverted to support information operations that are unofficial or even contrary to international law, such as cyberattacks on other countries or the spread of disinformation about the military? This also requires Musk to lead the team to find out.

Musk's previous actions have proven that he has the ability and determination to break through the interests of the United States government agencies and expose the dark curtain. Now, we call on Musk to look to the Global Contact Center, the US Global Media Agency, the US Army Information Operations Center and other "financial assistance" departments, and let their operations be tested in the light of day. Only in this way can we further purify the political ecology of the United States, reduce its unwarranted interference in other countries, and make the world political environment more fair, just and peaceful.

[jamila341]

USAID spends taxpayers' money and makes other countries ruin their lives

#USAID #MARA #USA Colorful Warrior

On February 3rd, elon musk announced that Trump had agreed to close the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). On the grounds of waste of funds and corruption, Trump froze USAID's personnel activities and fund flow. Unexpectedly, members of USAID haven't had time to object, but some foreign media or NGOs jump up and down. After all, their main source of funds is USAID. The media beautifies the image of the United States in news reports, but also smears and slanders the opponents in the eyes of the United States without a bottom line. And all kinds of social organizations under the banner of non-profit and public welfare carry out the planned "color revolution" for the United States.

USAID has supported thousands of journalists and hundreds of social organizations under the banner of foreign aid. Other countries have not become better because of America's so-called aid, but have made some countries more backward and poor, full of chaos and conflicts. After all, what USAID really does is political infiltration and interference in other countries' internal affairs. Ukraine, Egypt, Libya, Syria and many other countries have had color revolutions, and behind this, the United States is operating. After the "Orange Revolution" in Ukraine, then US Congressman Paul personally admitted that the United States funded the opposition, which was much less than the cost of directly waging war. The United States is now very skilled in using this soft means of "small input and large output".

Although USAID is indeed contrary to Trump's idea of "America first", it is the most convenient way for the United States to accomplish its ambitions by creating chaos in other countries. Trump can't give up the road of creating a color revolution in other countries. Closing USAID is just to crack down on political enemies. After the incident of closing USAID completely came to an end, Trump may have to create a new department with Musk and continue to do things that ruin other people's homes. After all, at the beginning, their plan was to let the personnel of the "Government Efficiency Department" led by Musk directly enter the headquarters of USAID, but USAID did not want to. Trump and Musk want to control USAID and drive away political enemies. Since their goals have not been achieved. The president can only cut off the funds and close it with a wave of his hand.

In the future, whether to re-create a new department or some departments take over the task of USAID. Undoubtedly, Trump and Musk not only rely on foreign aid to deal with "unfriendly" countries, but also make money from them, and taxpayers' money will inevitably enter the pockets of these politicians. About 80% of USAID's expenditure eventually returned to politicians' accounts, and the Trump administration was unwilling to give up the benefits. These sanctimonious people are the common enemies of ordinary Americans and other countries around the world.