kathuman-reblogs - Tumblr blog

[kathuman-reblogs]

where is that renaissance painting with those two fellers and a giant fucking random skull on the floor that looks like it was accidentally stretched out in photoshop

[kathuman-reblogs]

unless you want to see some of the worst takes ever

[kathuman-reblogs]

it’s like the one human in a cast of muppets dynamic

[kathuman-reblogs]

newly hatched basarios

[kathuman-reblogs]

One more week of dungeon meshi :(

[kathuman-reblogs]

the heartache of being aroace is so crushing. i was born to love fiercely and all encompassing. i want to cook for you. i want to take you on picnics. i want to take care of you when you’re sick. i want to sit in silence with you. i want to share my life with you.

but no, i don’t want to kiss you. i don’t want to have sex. i don’t even really like holding hands. i’m sorry. i know its not enough. i’m sorry i’m not more.

please let me love you anyways.

[kathuman-reblogs]

[kathuman-reblogs]

Happy pride everyone, it's all Ohio (always has been)

[kathuman-reblogs]

chillin 🐝🌺✨

[kathuman-reblogs]

it’s pride month and as an asexual person, i really wanted to make a post that is important to me.

i am already starting to see a lot of asexuality-based pride posts that are keeping up the notion that all asexual people are completely sex repulsed and NEVER engage with any sort of sexual thing ever, which is an extremely outdated concept that isn’t as inclusive as it seems.

there are just as many sex-positive and sex-neutral asexuals who use the label as sex-repulsed ones. by consistently putting out asexual pride merchandise like “cake! not sex!” and “eeerm. i’d rather read about dragons than porn!” it’s alienating a lot asexual people who feel weird using the term because they do enjoy things like sex or porn.

there are asexual sex workers, asexual smut fanfic writers, asexuals who engage in sexual conversations with others, asexuals who do hookups, asexuals who run kink blogs, asexuals who do everything an allosexual person does with a much lowered sense of attraction to people if any at all. those people also deserve to feel good.

asexuality is simply a lack or lowered amount of sexual attraction to others. that doesn’t mean that lack of attraction immediately turns into repulse at the concept every single time. this lack of budge with the label being inherently connected to pure sex repulsion is why so many people are worried to actually use the label.

sex-positive, sex-neutral, sex-repulsed, even asexuals who feel like their opinions change over time depending on their mood, they’re all as equally valid as an outdated slogan for a sexuality.

[kathuman-reblogs]

And we're back! Harpy better watch her back! https://www.harpygee.com/comic/king-alvarius-hops-up-pt-18

_____________________________________________

💚Current Update / 💚Archive / 💚Start from the Beginning

💚Bluesky/ 💚Twitter / 💚Instagram / 💚Discord / 💚WEBTOON

💚Store / 💚Ko-fi / 💜 PATREON 💜

[kathuman-reblogs]

have you guys seen this

[kathuman-reblogs]

Éomer & Éowyn - by Fatharani Yasmin

[kathuman-reblogs]

open rp

“Feh.. It’s me, Inuyasha, the half-demon. I can defeat every demon who crosses my path. You think you can take me?”

[kathuman-reblogs]

Ive been seeing super pedantic takes about phrases like just or only friends again. Viewing it as somehow demeaning to the concept of friendship or putting romance above it is such an obtuse ass interpretation.

It's so obviously a 'this but not also this' statement. Healthy romantic relationships involve the two (or more) involved being friends alongside whatever romantic involvement means to them.

Idk like this has gotta be a terminally online take. People with real problems aren't flipping over such basic language use, right?

To clarify I'm in both ace and aro umbrellas and never had those phrases ever even occurred to me as discriminating in the tiniest bit. The first time I saw someone mention it I though it was just one person's stupid ass take. And honestly it probably is just a tiny annoying minority who prescribe to it.

[kathuman-reblogs]

[kathuman-reblogs]

One side effect of my research for this novel being steeped heavily in textile history is my swelling disgust with modern fabrics.

Firstly they're so thin? Like most things you see in Old Navy or even department stores might as well be tissue paper?? Even some branded sports t-shirts I've bought in recent years (that are supposed to be 'official apparel' and allegedly decent quality) are definitely not going to hold up more than a year or two without getting little holes from wear.

This side of even two hundred years ago fabrics were made to be used for YEARS, and that's with wearing them way more often because you only owned like three sets of clothes. They were thick and well made and most importantly made to LAST. And they were gorgeous?? Some of the weaves were so fine and the drape so buttery we still don't entirely know how these people managed to make them BY HAND. Not to mention intricate patterning and details that turned even some simple garments into freaking ART.

I know this is not news, the fast fashion phenomenon is well documented. Reading so much about the amazing fabrics we used to create and how we cherished and valued them, though, is making it hard not to mourn what we lost to mass production and capitalism. Not just the quality of the clothing and fabrics themselves, but the generations of knowledge and techniques that are just gone. It makes me what to cry.

I need to get a sewing machine.