kayym1593-blog

[kayym1593-blog]

I too felt that the beauty of the stain glass windows in regards to suger and his creation were really beautiful as well. I personally enjoyed the whole concept of how he related different pieces of his work and within the story he read to christ. Even though I am not religious myself the mere idea of how he was able to create kind of his own relevance to was unique. Simply brought forth a really creative perspective that isn’t always common. I feel in some aspect gothic art held a lot of influences for how an array of cathedrals and churches were formed, but I also feel the mere beauty that stain glass windows hold made it a lot easier for others to be drawn to it and then use it in their own pieces as well. 

I personally found the sculptors to be the best aside from the stain glass, I think the detail itself gave it that much more personality which in turn made it more appealing to look at overall. I think the structure of these churches and cathedrals were also really beautiful, yet the concept of beauty to me is more relevant to the detail that is brought forth in it overall. 

I too believe that the architecture allowed for that concept of advancement in art, yet I also feel that it more so caused and led to an array of different cathedrals being created world wide which I found really cool as well. Simply the idea of how quickly it spread and how many others used it and in turn created their own kind of art from it was really cool, even though I perosnally felt that it was really repetitive, just in the sense that it lacked its own unique feel but It still was interesting to read and interesting to view!

Thanks for sharing your thoughts!

Blog Post 15

This week the chapter is about the origins and some of the art that is considered Gothic art. Before reading this chapter I had no previous knowledge about this art. It was nice to approach this chapter with a open mind. 

The first piece of architecture that is mentioned in the book is Saint-Denis. From Suger’s addition to Saint-Denis was the creation of Gothic art. I thought it was interesting to learn about the influences that Suger had. The book says that Suger studied the construction of a temple and writings of Saint-Denis. Inside this chapel the columns and arches remind of the architecture that we learned about from previous chapters like in Roman art for example. I thought the picture of the chapel bay helped at envisioning how incredible this place was because the arches have fine detail at the top of columns. This picture also includes the sun shining through the stain glass which was prominent in Gothic churches. I appreciate all the other architecture but I find the stained glass to be the most appealing. The chapter goes into more detail about stained glass and I was unaware of all the steps that go into creating these pieces of art. Pieces of fired glass are cut into individual pieces in the shape of the picture and then they are fitted into a structure made from metal. When I seen the picture of the stained glass it reminds me of the churches that I have seen. It was interesting to find out that in early time Christian churches rarely had stained glass but in Dubuque now almost much every Christian church has stained glass in their church windows. This shows that over the years periods like the Romanesque and Gothic times had influence over other periods. 

It is not uncommon for the exterior of churches to have detailed sculptures that represent the beliefs of that church.The Chartres Cathedral has sculptures made of stone on the west and south sides of the cathedral. This seems to be a common thing with not only churches but any place of worship or somewhere that is spiritual. For example in Egyptian architecture outside of tombs are large sculptures that represent their culture in someway. This type of art also reminds me of Roman art because the Triumphal Arch has fine detail of figures and patterns on the outside of a large arch. The book then goes into detail about the interior of the Chartres Cathedral which in my opinion is just as interesting as the exterior. The tall ceiling with arches going across is a statement of how much time that was put into the architecture of the building. The rose window and lancets was the most appealing window because of the size. The books says that the rose windows is about 42 feed wide which seems extremely large. 

The architecture from the Gothic period seemed like the most prominent art that came from this time. Each cathedral created was a reflection of how advanced these architects were in this time. The size and every little detail that was put into these buildings is mind blowing. The last thing I would like to add is according to the book the Cologne Cathedral started being built in 1248 and was completed in 1350. That means the people that started were not even alive when it was finished. Architecture like this takes over 100 years to complete. 

[kayym1593-blog]

Week 15 Chapter 13 Blog

This chapter was all about Gothic art, and where it initially originated from and exactly how it came to be labeled as such. Right in the beginning this chapter gives a brief over view of what Gothic Art is, and how it was the art primarily, “produced in Western Europe.” (Pg. 198 Para 1). Not only that but term of gothic art itself isn’t entirely clear. “The origins of Gothic art had nothing to do with what had happened several hundred years earlier. But when the scholars realized the source of the confusion, it was too late.” (Pg. 198. Para 1) 

This in itself was rather humorous to me. Simply in the context of how as time passes, the true origin of something, the true meaning of can be completely obscured to a point where how it came forth doesn’t seemingly make sense. I only found this interesting in the sense that as expressed in previous blogs, the real idea of “is this truly where it came from? What message does this really hold?” Is completely unclear. It simply proves that point of how, all history that we have, we honestly can not know what is true and what is not simply because the “message of” that has been passed on, is simply that. One word over another. Even with physical evidence the idea of where something came from, the meaning it truly holds, is still rather fuzzy. 

I also found it rather peculiar how the terms of something can take upon an entirely different meaning in different era’s and or time-zones. When I personally think of the Term Gothic, since being obscured through time, the image that is presented is more so of a dark magic type of feel. Witch craft, pain, etc. Therefore when I first came upon this title I truly felt that a lot of the art presented within this chapter was going to be simply that, dark. Brooding, and lacking the pure beauty that much of the architecture, sculptures, stain glass, among other art within, held.

Furthermore into the chapter, we are introduced to more history of the different types of art that was present during this specific time frame. Not only that, but this art compared to an array of other art in the more recent chapters we have read, seemingly holds an array of architecture, and more so ties into the concept of “religion” and the relevance to churches, and art that initially was created to kind of “praise” an array of those who were seemingly praised during this time period, and or those that come from say Christianity, or the specific religion that this era praised as well.I found it rather interesting when I encountered this portion within the chapter, 

“Suger was inspired by the author’s emphasis on the mathematical harmony that should exist between the parts of a building and on the miraculous, mystical effect of light. This was elaborated into a theory based on musical ratios; the result was a system that expressed complex symbolism based on mathematical ratios.” (Pg. 198 Para 4) 

Which this man then used to sway how he reconstructed this specific church, and how he initially used this message as a relevance to Christ and used that as a foundation for Saint Denis, and an array of art that was created moving forth. “The new style was particularly popular in northern and central France.” (Pg. 200 Para 1) It seems that this style of “Gothic Art” In turn sparked an array of architecture to be created, one’s that held such detail such beauty, that the layout of was initially used in a variety of architecture/churches/buildings, (such as piers, flying buttresses, Pointed arches, ribbed vaults, and of course the skeletal structure.) that were then created.

In fact. “French architects built over eight Gothic cathedrals. And then “migrated north to England, south to Spain, and east to Germany and Austria.” (Pg. 200 Para 1) Although I am not too fond on architecture, I felt that this simple detail and history from this era, was extremely unique. Just the concept of seeing how fast news can travel, and in fact when art is admired and seen as something of beauty, how it then can expand rather quickly world wide.

Aside from Architecture, one that seemed very fond during this era there was also stained glass window art, “which filtered light through colored fragments of glass.” (Pg. 201 Para 1), Chartres, and sculptures of charters. I personally found these to be extremely appealing to look at. Even though a variety of the sculptures were of popes, Mary, Christ, or others, I still felt that they made the architecture/cathedrals themselves more beautiful. Aside from the stain glass windows and much beauty done by the detail from inside the churches, I think bringing forth these allowed for these different buildings to have more personality. As expressed in prior blogs, I am not too big on architecture, therefore reading about this, seeing much detail done from, I felt that it then allowed me to be more interested in this type of art overall. It was rather nice to also admire the pictures presented in the book simply because I personally have never seen much of that type of art in person.

Although I am unsure of where I stand religion wise, and currently do not have a religion I stand by, I still again find it rather interesting that a variety of the art that was created during this time among others was revolved around Christianity, like was there truly nothing more they could relate the art they created off of? “Wherever possible and appropriate, Gothic artists integrated Christian dogma into the cathedrals.” (Pg. 212, Para 4) It just makes it seem that a lot of the artists during this era lacked charisma, and or their own individuality in terms of the artwork they created.

 Although beautiful, the stain glass, the churches, the sculptures outside and inside the churches, the layout of them themselves, I still feel that this concept of thought this concept of only basing your art upon on thing, pulls from really bringing forth your own creative edge. Gothic art spread rather quickly, which is great, and seeing how quickly it can spread is also great but I just personally feel that when copies of things are extended, it truly does pull away from that individuality that each artist could then present. But yet again, this is based upon my one opinion and based upon a female living in 2019 compared to the era they came from. 

The art they created during this time frame was beautiful and reading upon the history of was rather interesting, and truly opened my eyes to having a much more in depth perception of what Gothic Art was, where it came from, what inspired it, and the background of it as a whole. It was truly an interesting read!

[kayym1593-blog]

I too found that the idea of religion held an extremely high influence upon the art that was present during this chapter among the previous one as well. I never truly knew and saw that religion held an extremely high influence upon how an array of cultures created and or shaped their art. I found that aspect of really interesting simply because in today’s world, even though yes there is still art that is created based upon the culture and the religion that one is, I see such a huge diversity with art overall that it really brings forth the idea of how much we as a world, as a society have adapted and changed as time passed. I also feel that alot of this past history influences a variety of the way that say the US runs things, and also created art that we see today. 

I personally love the detailing of the Islamic art that was created, but I personally felt kind of pulled away from the idea that certain art was forbidden only because as being one with a creative mindset, seeing that certain cultures or great artists, were kind of persuaded to create certain pieces of art due to what their culture or religion was is kind of sad. I personally just feel one should not have limitations to what they can create, even if yes it does go against their religion. I get that perception I just have that opinion of overall. 

In terms of invasions I feel that so much of this chapter spoke of that happening. Which is extremely depressing. I found it very hard to focus upon the beautiful pieces of art that were created due to the variety of negative events that happened during. It just seemingly spoke a lot about these invasions which in turn pulls away entirely from that history of the art that was present during these chapters as well. 

I like that you gave detail about the different art that was present and how it was relevant to you personally. I find that really unique. 

Great Post

Blog Post Week 13

This weeks blog post is about art from the Early Middle Ages. Previous to reading this chapter I had no previous knowledge of art from this time. The book says that the rise of the Early Middle ages happened following the decline of the Roman Empire which was from the 7th to the end of the 10th century. Like last week I find this weeks chapter to be interesting material because from viewing and observing the art you can tell there is a high influence of religion in their art much like the Christian art.

Islamic Art has high influence from their religion because they basically live for their religion so they must obey the rules. The Koran state that it forbids the figurative representation of Allah or his prophets so majority of all the paintings include abstract geometric and floral patterns. I found it interesting that sculptures were considered the work of Satan so sculptures in Islamic art really didn’t exist. On the other hand the monumental architecture and architecture decorations made up for not having sculptures because this art thrived in Islam. In Cordoba the Great Mosque was originally created for the first Muslim ruler of Spain and it seemed like a beautiful place to see. The design of the double arches were interesting because in the large interior space it looks like a bunch of separate walk ways. These arches where 9 feet 9 inches and the paint and details on the top of these columns add a pleasing visual. The part of the Great Mosque that really caught my eye was the mihrab bay in the mosque. The ceiling in this part of the mosque has a intense mosaic filled with abstract patterns of floral and geometric shapes. In my opinion I really liked the color choice because it has enough contrast to see the individual design but still blended together nicely. The room itself also had beautiful complicated patterns that are very intricate that I found interesting. This would be something special to see in its time because now it is a cathedral and only has some of the beauty that existed during its time. 

The next topic in this chapter was the Northern European Art. During this time no monumental architecture, paintings, or sculptures were created from this time due to invasions, but another type of art was being made which was influenced by the invaders. A piece of art that is famous from this time would be the Sutton Hoo purse cover. This purse cover was made of gold and red garnets and in my opinion is a fancy looking purse cover. The figures on this piece of art are pleasing to look at because it is symmetrical. The patterns on this also are an eye catcher because the line detail in this work is clean. The last piece of art that I found to be really interesting was the Four Evangelists from a gospel book. I really do not understand what is happening in the painting but the dark blue background on the white robes of the people adds great contrast and the dark figures add to the painting seeming like they are evil in some way. In conclusion I found this chapter to be interesting because I didn’t have much knowledge of this art but after seeing some I really like the colors and patterns that were used in most of this art. 

[kayym1593-blog]

Week 13 Chapter 11 Blog

This weeks chapter was a very thorough background of the Early middle ages, among the art that was present during. Right in the beginning of the chapter it speaks about the Decline of Roman Empire, due to “Germanic tribes over-ran Western Europe” which then “affected artistic developments and producing radical changes in social and political organization. In addition to the Germanic Invasions, a powerful new influence from Middle East entered Europe-Islam.” (Pg 171. Para 1) One of the bigger topics within this chapter was Islamic art, as expressed above, Islam entered Europe during the decline, which then led to an array of changes not only among the politics, and artistic development but also by the diversity of culture that was present. In turn it was like a “new world order.” Kind of took place due to the events that led to the decline. 

Upon reading about Islamic art, it expressed an array of concerns present to me as an artist, or one who has a very open mind. In terms of this Era, it reminded me solely upon how our government and how society kind of is today. Not only does this chapter make it very clear that during these times the concept of over running and “taking over” different cultures, or places, it also kind of ties into that idea of division. Although I understand that each culture, are going to hold different views, different perceptions overall, the idea that certain things were forbidden and (still are to this day in certain cultures.) Just is kind of heartbreaking I guess. Because if you really think about it, if during this time specifically in Islamic art among others that I will touch upon later within this post, if they were allowed to create sculptures among other art that was considered .”forbidden. and “Sculpture was considered the work of satan and virtually non existent.” (Pg 171, Para 2) I feel that the beauty that would have been brought forth from it, would have been really interesting to see. I also simply disagree with the idea that certain work was forbidden and that they as well as many other places I have read during these few weeks, had rulers. I just feel as an artist, one should be able to truly create whatever their mind wishes regardless of what the Islamic perception is. Yet again I have to respect that this was kind of how it was, and still is in an array of places. 

I really found the architecture that was shaped during this time was really beautiful, I think the detailing of spoke to me in an extremely unique and “colorful” way. I found it kind of sad that “In the thirteenth century, Christians gained control of the mosque. Three centuries later it was badly damaged when they built a cathedral inside it.” (Pg. 172 Para 3) I find it rather heartbreaking that simply because say the christians during this time felt they needed to “add more” and make it more so “their own” by adding this inside of it after taking it over.. is really sad. It just again ties into that idea of division and how much damage power can truly do. It’s as if the Christians that felt this was “okay to do” during the time didn’t even appreciate the beauty of what the Islams had created prior. It’s truly heartbreaking. Again these are assumptions of, but I personally just feel that certain pieces of art should seriously be left alone,especially if it’s been around prior to their “gaining control of” in a way it’s like insulting to do something as such when there was already such beauty present within.

The next portion of this chapter tied into Northern European Art, and brought forth that history of Beowulf. Which I felt was really unique as well. An array of different art that was present as well was Anglo Saxon Metalwork as well as Hiberno Saxon Art, Monasteries, Manuscripts, Chapels as well as other art to. I personally felt this specific era tied a lot into religion, and basing the art that was created upon that entirely. I found it really unique as well that majority of art from past decades was sparked and influenced by alot of religion and specific “rulers” and their specific beliefs at the time. Because in today’s world we see such a huge diversity of art that stray entirely from the idea of religion and more so revolve around the idea of basic “art” and the “beauty it holds.” As well.

A lot of this chapter spoke of invasions that happened in a variety of these different areas, “Ireland escaped occupation by the Romans in the first and second centuries and invasions by The Germanic hordes in the fifth century.” (pg.175. Para 2) Simply seeing that this was kind of a “repeated” event among these different areas, honestly kind of pulls entirely away from the art history that I am sure was meant to be a highlight of this chapter. I personally think I got more swept up within that history of, and that idea that everyone wanted what everyone else had, and in turn couldn’t find peace with their lives making the art that was created completely obscured simply due to that idea of well okay, whose art is whose, and exactly why would this art be more important then the sheer idea that this era seemed to be in complete division. Maybe this is just my assumptions, but I personally just found it a bit hard to be interested and focused upon all the beautiful artwork that was created during this time period with all the “division” and “take overs” that seemed to happen on every page.

The last portion of this chapter was about the Ottonian Period, which was a time when “Vikings took over Normandy and saxons resumed control of Germany.”  (Pg. 182 Para 1) It talked deeply about the metal work that was created and how in fact it had shown the “impact of Roman Influence on Bernward and Otto.” (Pg. 182 Para 4) 

Although I am not religious, or do not believe I am, I found the architecture that was present within each of these portions to be the most “appealing” to look at, I really did also find the Purse cover pretty cool as well. I personally am big on the detailing that certain pieces of art hold, simply because in a way it then brings that piece more to “life” and gives it more of a personality overall. 

[kayym1593-blog]

I enjoyed reading your post! IT was really thorough and you gave really good information upon the additional research required for this week! I find it rather interesting that you point out the whole concept of how majority of the art that was created was more so influenced by the religion of Christianity. I did notice that as well, but I guess I didn’t really combine the idea of how like all of the art created during this time was based and or revolved around that religion itself! I too found the architecture to be extremely beautiful, I felt it stood out to me the most as well simply because the detail of was extravagant, not only that but the beauty and remarkableness it held as a big picture was truly inspiring. Even though I personally do not attend church I always found a liking to the art that was present within it! Glad I am not alone with that! 

The individual research was a bit odd for me, I personally didn’t really understand what we were suppose to write about and or how it was relevant, but upon reading it allowed me to realized that in fact that portion was connected to this chapter that we in fact read. Simply because it related to the idea of Christianity and art that therefore sparked due to that religion itself. But I think your piece about Japan and the art that was present during this time was really interesting to read upon as well, simply seeing the diversity in an array of places is really unique to me! 

Thanks for sharing your thoughts! 

Blog Post Week 12

The discussion topic for this week is Early Christian and Byzantine art. Right away I thought of the Christian religion and some of the early history about this. Their religion would have a major influence on their art and architecture because their religion is basically what their beliefs are based off of. The marble sarcophagus in the Church of S. Maria Antiqua in Rome is the perfect example of their religion reflecting art because on the visible side there is a visual from the Old Testament and the New Testament which includes carvings of Jonah and the Whale as well as John the Baptist baptizing a child and other carvings of religious figures. This section notes that this carved sarcophagus had influence from the Greeks, Etruscans, and Romans because they would carve sculpture with religion figures. Moving onto Byzantine art previous to this chapter I did not have much knowledge of art from this time. In my opinion I was shocked at how incredible Hagia Sophia looked on the outside and the inside. From the outside it looks like a large temple with 4 towers on each corner. From the inside the ceiling looks drastically high and the pillar structures made it look high class as well as the mosaic decorations. Finally I would like to point out that this place was an imperial building and was only available for the emperor and his court so this was not available to the public. I think this is a true reflection of how important royalty was. In conclusion, the art from this chapter was pretty interesting but in my opinion I like the Hagia Sophia and the San Vitale because of how large and incredible the architecture was. 

For the second part of this post I researched Japanese art from 1-500 A.D. During this time in Japan the people that lived their would practice building tombs out of large mounds and they would be buried with treasure. These large tombs were evidence of Japan developing a power with central government. Some of the treasures buried in these tombs were objects like bronze mirrors, personal belongings, and clay vessels. Advancing into a more structured art in the early 400s more advanced clay pottery was being developed like using a pottery wheel to create their art. During the Yayoi period a piece of pottery was created which was a jar and in my opinion I find it fascinating and impressive that in 100-300 A.D. a jar was created with the design Im familiar with seeing. This would bring up the point that this design has influenced pottery for thousands of years because there is a lot of pottery that looks like this and the Japanese were doing this in roughly 100-300 A.D. In my opinion the art from this period is interesting because at a glance with no prior knowledge these sculptures would seem basic but if you think of how old these piece of art actually are it will blow your mind because art existing all the way back to 300 A.D. seems almost impossible because life was not very advanced in that time.  After doing a little research and seeing some of the art from this time was interesting because I really had no knowledge prior to looking at this website. But in conclusion I was impressed at how influential and advanced this art was i this time.

https://www.metmuseum.org/toah/ht/05/eaj.html

[kayym1593-blog]

Week 12 Blog

         For my individual research I chose Egypt. In Previous chapters I have read and throughout my life overall, I feel I have personally been drawn to a lot of Egyptian art. I always found great beauty in an array of art that was common during that time frame, many being the temples, or the statues that held the pharaohs, or god’s/goddesses after passing.  In regards to this weeks chapter, this specific art related by how, “in the mid-second century Alexandria becomes one of the leading intellectual centers of the Christian Church.” Which I personally found fascinating. This portion was really interesting to read, not only to admire the art and gain a better history of it overall, but also to read upon the history of the art, and what was happening during this time frame. Although there were quite a few different events that took place during this time frame I felt the most that stood out to me personally, and related more so to this weeks chapter was the concept of how Christianity seemingly was fairly popular during this time, as well as the history that Alexandria, was in fact the “focal point of Greek culture on the Mediterranean and the Nexus of Roman trade routes.” Not only that but it then speaks of the evolvement that took place during as well, and how they had expanded their perceptions and how they initially would do things. And then how in fact, Christian art became extremely common as well during this time. “ The arts in all media—stone and wood sculpture, carved ivories, painted glass, ceramics, and textiles—are decorated with pagan and Christian themes reflecting the cultural diversity of the era.” Which was really unique just in the way that the diversity of became more common. Yet with Christianity becoming more common, the idea of how it was then also used within the art, kind of makes you wonder then where did it truly start? How did it really come about? The artwork that was displayed upon the site, I felt was really unique and very beautiful! I really liked the architecture, and the few statues. I personally do not find a liking to Christian Art overall, but I think the diversity of during this time was really cool.

    Now in terms of the reading for this week, Chapter ten. They strongly relate to this individual research that was present as well. Chapter ten was all about Christianity and the rise of Christianity and then the different types of art that followed suit. “The teachings of Jesus and his followers led to the establishment of the Christian religion, whose impact on Western art after the fall of Rome cannot be overestimated. Christianity began as one of many Eastern cults in the Mediterranean world and in Rome itself during the first century after Christ.” (Pg. 154 Para 1) Christianity itself and reading about the history is a bit touchy for me, I can read it with an open mind but the idea of Christianity and how it was more so used as something that divided many, “These attitudes set Christianity at odds with the imperial Roman establishment and made its followers subject to persecution by Rome. As a result, despite the rapid growth of Christianity, its special appeal to the lower classes of society, and the fervor of its adherents, it remained an underground movement” (Pg 176 Para 3) and more so a power trip for some which also led to many hating and or treating others poorly and basing their whole lives upon this bible, is just a touchy and more so sensitive topic for me Simply due to my not knowing where I stand currently with that perception. In terms of this personal relevance, I found it fairly humorous (in no way meaning to be offensive to any Christians) that they used the term “Cult” in regards to Christianity. I personally have always associated cults with like scary movies etc, but anyways. In regards to the book, this whole chapter spoke majorly about Christianity and then the rise of the Byzantine and or Christian art. “A good example of continuing Roman imagery in Early Christian art can be seen on a marble sarcophagus in the Church of S. Maria Antiqua in Rome.” (155 Para 1) Not only that but this chapter went into great detail about the history or symbolism each different pieces of art held. 

     I found it rather sad that Christianity was something that was hid and or “practiced in private homes until early fourth century.” (Pg 156 Para 1) In some way the idea something has to be hidden makes me personally question the accountability of the religion itself and then how it became more so liked and more common as time progressed. This chapter speaks slightly upon that perception but more so in the terms of how it is relevant to Rome and or how Byzantine played a role within Christianity as well. I personally really admired and or found the churches extremely appealing. Even though I do not attend church, (Have in the past) I have always had an extreme admiration toward the art work that is put within the variety of different churches throughout the planet as a whole. When I would go to church I would always love to admire the stain glass windows among the architecture itself, which this chapter spoke much upon and how it more so came to fruition. I really enjoyed reading the description of each type of mosaic art as well. I feel that an array of Christianity, and or the religion itself more so caused and or wreaked an array of chaos upon the Rome and or Greek, it seemingly is present that an array of tribes were bombarded and or attacked which is really sad, it kind of makes you think upon if this is where this idea of division and or hating upon each other due to them having a different religion spawned from or if that was more so a common ground among the world as a whole. I simply felt that an array of events that happened during this time were fairly dramatic, and or unnecessary even though I understand how say one religion could have found something say insulting, yet I truly don’t get the desire to bring forth violence or dispute. “The Byzantine style continued in Eastern and Western Christendom for several centuries following the age of Justinian.In the eighth and ninth centuries, the very nature of imagery became a subject of dispute. This is referred to as the Iconoclastic Controversy, in which the virtues and dangers of religious imagery were hotly debated.” (Pg 166 Para 6)

    In terms of art, throughout this chapter it shows a great diversity when it comes to the art that was present during this time, from churches, to mosaic, to sculptures and or basic paintings that were done to depict the variety of Christianity and or those that were worshiped and or praised at this time. A great example being, “centrally planned church of Hagia Sophia in Constantinople. It was dedicated to Christ as the personification of Holy (hagia) Wisdom (Sophia).” (Pg. 164 Para 1) An extremely in depth piece of architecture that is now a state museum widely known and admired from many. I found the extent of Christianity mosaic art to be rather interesting, just the idea of gaining that idea of where it all started and or the meaning and message it held overall to different people and still does to this day is rather inspiring. I found this chapter to hold a really interesting amount of information about Christianity and the art that followed suit and or all the chaos or triumphs that were brought forth through a variety of different people. In a way it kind of opened up that perception to accepting and or being more “open minded” to all that truly is and how it could initially affect one leading up to this day. 

[kayym1593-blog]

I love your post. I felt you went into a great amount of detail about this chapter itself. I really enjoyed the sculptures out of all of the art that was presented within this chapter, I felt that it kind of talked a ton about architecture overall, and I personally found that kind of a bore. I am not exactly found of Architecture, even though I do believe it holds beauty! 

The paintings and the mosaic was not exactly one I enjoyed. I personally felt they were extremely “violent and or presented images of more so evil than not. Even though I assume the message and or what was painted was not meant to be expressed in that manner and was more so meant to praise the God’s and or the ones that were presented within it itself, Yet I personally found it a big odd, and or “scary”. 

I too believe that Ancient Rome was influenced highly but is also something that is more so a creation of their own even if it kind of resembled Greece in some way. I think it too held beauty, but more so to me in the sculptures than the other pieces that were present.

But your post gave much insight to the detail of what this chapter itself was about overall. Which Was really interesting to read. I think you really gave a thorough response which is refreshing to read. 

Great Post

Ancient Rome

For this week we are taking a closer look into Ancient Rome and previous to reading this chapter I did not have much knowledge of art from this time. To start off the architecture in Rome was influenced by Near East, Greece and Etruria. The main material used was concrete which was a material that helped much of the structures in Rome stand regardless of size and shape. Their domestic architecture seems like nothing special but in ancient times these houses and apartments were much nicer than say living in a clay hut. The public buildings from this time are truly a reflection of how nicely constructed these buildings were. Typically they were either a forum building which was square or rectangular open space bounded on three sides, and the basilica which is a high roofed structure which is at the end of a forum. These public buildings were constructed nicely and looked high class because of the architecture. For example the Markets of Trajan looks like a fine piece of architecture because of the arched windows and the rounded layout of the building. A more familiar piece of architecture would be the Colosseum. I recognize this structure previous to reading this chapter and all I have to say is there is a reason this is highly famous because its a beautiful structure and many human and animal battles took place in the arena for the romans to watch. The other types of architecture from Rome would include commemorative architecture and religious architecture. 

Moving on to different types of art from this time would include sculptures. The sculpture are made with great detail and look realistic. A Young Flavian Woman is a very beautiful bust which has great detail in the hair and looks real because of the detail in the curls and strands of hair. A popular statue from this time is the Augustus of Prima Porta. I particularly like this piece of art because of the fine detail and also because you get sense of what styles existed in Rome and the clothes they wear and the overall idea of what people looked like in this ancient time. 

The last type of art that was talked about in the book was the paintings and mosaics. Some of these paintings were able to be seen because they used wax in the time of the creation of the paintings to preserve them. Many of them survived and were discovered in Pompeii and Herculaneum. I like the Soothsayer mosaic because even though the faces in the picture are blurry I think the details being pieced together are very pleasing. The next piece of art which I like the most is the Villa of Mysteries. This piece of art was painted on the walls and from the pictures seems like a large painting. I think the overall idea of what is going on in the painting is confusing but the conclusion is that a ritual is going on which seems accurate. It does not include much color but I think what was used was the right amount of color. The thing that stands out the most to me is the person in the white robe. I feel like the person was painted wearing white because they are significant in some way. 

Overall I believe the art from Ancient Rome is highly influenced but in a way is its own art. I like the large concrete structures as well as the fine detail paintings that come from this time. The sculpture too were highly detailed. The art from this time is a reflection of the life in Ancient Rome. 

[kayym1593-blog]

Week 11, Chapter 9

Chapter Nine Blog

           The majority of Chapter nine touched base upon the different kinds of art present within this time frame, but I felt majority of the chapter itself revolved around the art that was Architecture, Colosseums, Buildings, and more so the relevance it held to the Ancient Rome civilization during this time frame. Although this chapter talked briefly about the background, and history of Ancient Rome, the adaptation of the laws, and the civilization as a whole, “The political genius of Rome lay in it’s ability to encompass, govern and assimilate cultures very different from its own. As time went on, Roman law made it increasingly easy for people from distant regions to attain citizenship even if they had never been to Rome. The city itself was the center of a great empire.” (Pg. 125, Para 1) I felt although it did give this brief overview and background of Rome, the majority of this chapter delved into the architecture, and very brief art of sculptures, and other art that was created within this era as well.

           I feel a majority of these chapters more so recently then not, tend to Compare Greece to Rome more so than not. “There were important differences between the Greek and Roman approaches to history, which in some sense parallel the differences in their views of art.” (Pg. 126 Para 3) Although I found that the architecture that was present during this time frame, such as the Hadrian’s villa which was “Built from A.D 118 to 138 near Tivoli which consisted of many buildings including libraries containing works in Greek and Latin, baths courtyards, temples, plazas and a theater.” (Pg. 129 Para 4). Was extraordinary and beautiful, I personally do not find myself drawn to Architecture more so then others, but as expressed prior due to the last chapter we had read, I do enjoy and rather appreciate reading about the history of, especially gaining a better insight as to how it came forth, what sparked the creation and how it ultimately was created. I do believe architecture has beauty, and is art itself. I personally just never had much of an interest in such pieces of art myself. It seems as though, within this time period a lot of these temples, and or buildings that were created, were mostly used as places of Worship for the Gods that they believed in during this time period. In a way it was kind of a shrine for these great gods, warriors, and emperors. “the apses contained statues of gods or emperors.” (Pg. 131 Para 1) I found it particularly interesting that a lot of these temples were also more so used for Court holdings, and or legal proceedings. This in itself kind of sparks that question of, did America gain majority of what we do in today’s world from Ancient Rome, or Greek? Is everything that we more so learned, and brought forth in America just a replica of what history is present during the Greek and Roman times? Because It just seems rather intriguing that majority of what I have read throughout this term, seems to be a lot of similarities with how America, our society and or are government runs things. Such as these temples specifically for court hearings etc. “Colonnades on either side of the nave provided an articulated space for socializing, people awaiting trial, and for those transacting business.” (Pg. 131 Para 2) I just find it extremely interesting that majority of what we see today, is extremely relevant and or similar to how things were back than in an entirely different country. Like is everything America has more so a clone? Just a rather interesting thought that crossed my mind during this reading.

           I also found it fairly sad that majority of these temples, such as the Forum has since been depleted, “Forum Cullum became the prototype for all later imperial forums, it must have presented a magnificent architectural spectacle but is now in ruins.” (Pg. 131, Para 2) Not only is it sad that something so unique has since decomposed among other things, It also sparks that curiosity of if something as such has since been destroyed, how in fact is any of the information or history of it truth? How does one know such history of if in fact it no longer stands? I felt that reading about all the different kinds of temples, buildings and what they were used for overall was extremely unique, and simply gives me a better idea of how and why things are the way they currently are in today’s world. It brings forth a variety of questions and then allows me to analyze and think more upon each.

           The last thing I will touch on is the Sculptures that were created during this time as well. The detail of the art itself is Extravagant. Just being able to create such beauty with such little materials is seriously amazing and inspiring to me. I really liked and admired the Young Flavian, and the Bacchus and the four seasons. Just the detail used within these sculptures themselves is remarkable. In today’s world it seems rather easy for one to “sculpt” such a piece of art, yet during this time frame, that ability to truly engrave that much detail into this stone, really is inspiring to me. I admired it deeply, and it seemed that the Rome’s did during this time frame as well. “busts were usually carved in marble, often from a wax death mask, so that even the most specific physiognomic details were preserved.” (Pg. 146, Para 1) “Deep carvings creates strong oppositions of light and dark that add to the sense of mass supported by the delicate, smoothly carved surfaces of the face and neck.” (Pg. 146. Para 1) Although majority of their sculptures were admiring the God’s and or Goddesses, I still found that they held much beauty among them.

           The Last portion of the chapter was about painting, and mosaic, “Roman murals are among the most significant legacies of the eruption of Mount Vesuvius. Hundreds of wall paintings and mosaics have been discovered among the ruins of Pompeii and Herculaneum. They provide the greatest evidence of Greek Hellenistic painting most of which no longer survive.” (Pg. 149, Para 3) Even though some of it holds beauty, I personally felt a lot of this art was extremely terrifying and brutal, minus the “still life, or the columns and pediment. The few art that was present within this chapter, I found extremely odd. It seemed to me as if the painters were expressing more evil than not. Which in turn makes one question why? Why was the paintings more graphic and or seemingly more “evil” then compared to some of the other pieces of art we have read about throughout this course. The first one they spoke of was the Issos Mosaic, which depicts three witches.” (Pg. 149 Para 5) It expresses within this chapter that pieces of art as such were popular in “private houses, as well as public buildings.” (Pg. 149 Para 5) But why? Like it to me isn’t even fascinating it’s rather scary actually. The second pieces is The villa of the mysterious, which “is clear that some kind of sacred ritual is taking place.” (Pg. 150, Para 1) Like how in the world is this considered art? I get it though, every culture is different, but it just seems very angry. And then makes one wonder what did many who expressed and created these paintings participate in during this era? Were there human sacrifices? Was witchcraft extremely common during this time period? Why did majority of these gods and or people drawn seem to express a heck of a lot of anger toward others? I get that Greek mythology has an array of death and majority of those during this era praised those gods, and majority of what is being painted is of a great god defeating say an evil one, yet it just seems rather dark compared to what I’ve seen in the previous chapters.

           I think this chapter held a lot of great information and expressed a lot of history upon this time frame, I personally enjoyed reading about this history more so than not.  I really think I enjoyed the sculptures the most among the rest of them.

[kayym1593-blog]

Week Ten Blog Post

Week 10 Blog

Chapter eight was all about the Etruscans and their relevance to Greek, and the art that they had during this time, and the different pieces of art they partook and were involved in such as pottery and sculptures, the role women played in Etruscan art, Funerary art (which was art that more so “embarked, and created a remembrance of those who had passed.), tomb paintings etc. This chapter talks about the diversity that was present among them, and the variety that they truly held overall. In some way, the Etruscans shared an array of similarities to the Greeks, and how they lived their lives. “Like the Greeks, the Etruscans never formed a single nation but coexisted as separate city-states with their own rulers.” (Pg. 117, Para 3) Within this chapter, it was present though, that the history of Etruscans were very slim. “The Etruscan language resembles none other that is presently known, and its origin is uncertain;but like Phoenician, from which the Greek alpabet was derived. Their writing was from left to right, and they adapted the Greek language to their own language. But it has since disappeared.” (Pg. 117 Para 5) This not only brings forth the dilemma of the truth of the Etruscans but it also brings forth that concern as to what is real, and what is not. And then limits us now to truly gaining a better insight to them as a whole. When we have missing information as such, it mostly limits our ability to really grow from it, and to truly have an understanding of the art that they held as well.

           Not only did Etruscans specialize in a variety of art, they also partook in architecture, as many Greek did as well. They created temples, and also expanded upon the style that they had used in terms of how they were created, and what they then symbolized overall. Throughout this reading, it seemed as if a variety of what the Etruscans specialized in, and the way they ultimately lived there lives was extremely similar to Greece, in fact there are an array of portions of this chapter that express they “adopted” this habit, or the way they spoke, wrote, or created their own art from Greek. Which then brings forth that question as to how similar and how close the two really were. How much they initially looked up to the Greek, and how much they truly resembled in years to come. When we look back to prior sentences about how an array of information upon them was lost, it then can allow me to draw a conclusion that in some essence, it hasn’t really been “lost” simply because in a weird interesting way, it mimics the way Greek/Greece had done things. Which then can allow me, or others who wish to expand upon the history to draw a better conclusion by looking more into detail upon the history of the Greeks overall, as a big picture. Did everything they do then come from them? It sparks some interesting controversy as well.

           I personally found a lot of the sculptures and art that they did, extremely beautiful. I loved the sculptures, I felt they held much detail which then set them apart from other things that they had created during the time, I like Apollo the Veil a lot, and I found the scene from the back of a mirror from Volterra extremely extravagant. Such detail, it tells a story in itself. I found it a bit odd of the picture that was drawn, but I feel in general the detail of was really beautiful. And the use of the Goddesses was extremely interesting as well. I personally love that about Greek mythology. Goddesses, and Gods. It brings forth that ability of equality among females and men compared to just having this One almighty god that the Christian bible speaks of. I have nothing specifically against their views for everyone is entitled to their own opinions but I personally just like the diversity and creativity that Greek mythology brings forth especially in sense of Goddesses. It was present in Etruscans that “they differed slightly from the Greeks in their attitude toward women. Judging from their art, Etruscan woman participated more in public life with their husbands and held higher positions than woman in ancient Greece.”  (Pg 120. Para 2) I personally found this really nice and kind of refreshing to read simply because in our society we struggled widely with finding equality within women and men. So thie portion allowed me to gain a better insight to this culture and kind of allowed me to have more respect for it overall.

           This chapter then went into more detail on the variety of different art that were present during this time, concluding with tomb paintings. I found the detail of and the preservation of these tombs and the meaning they held during was really interesting. Simply the idea that they painted certain images to “protect the tomb from evil influences” was really interesting. It showed that they themselves as a whole were really “superstious” and in turn then made me wonder if this concept of thought kind of sparked from this era and this culture. Reading this kind of reminded me of this movie, as above so below. It’s this movie about a haunted tomb, one that has been around for some time, and anyone who enters it embarks upon an array of supernatural experiences, ghosts, demons etc. Even though this culture didn’t vividly talk upon this, it kind of made me question that validity, and then made me curious about exactly where that idea even came from. The idea of evil influences. Did they necessarily mean spirits or more so actual human beings? Did the idea of demons and spirits spawn from them? Where did it come from etc. I just found that rather peculiar to think upon.

           In conclusion, much information about the Etruscans is really limited, and it kind of just leaves you or others to that assumption of what if, or who they really were. Which is relevant to any history that we read upon and have read throughout this term. “The Etruscans remained a culturally distinct group retaining their own language, religion, and customs for nearly a millennium.-how to read the will of gods and foretell the future.” This in itself brings forth an array of questions about this culture and their perception of art as a whole, I really liked the sentence where it expressed, “Etruscans were the envy of Greek and Rome woman alike.” Simply because one it’s relevant to time in today’s world, the idea that women are extremely competitive and or judgemental to another, when in reality the other party usually admires the other more so than not. Simply tying into what was expressed prior, the Etruscans seemed to admire the Greeks as a whole. They seemed to pick up and learn an array of things from the Greece, yet then the Greek and Roman woman were envious of the Etruscan women? Just kind of comical in itself especially since “two centuries later, Etruscans succumbed to full Romanization.” This conclusion simply brings forth an array of questions that are left unanswered, but will be questions many of us will hold as we continue about our daily lives.

           I personally enjoyed this chapter, among others but I found this culture pretty interesting and unique, and it then brings forth an array of questions that I can use toward the art we see today.

[kayym1593-blog]

I felt I related to alot of what you had said in a really positive manner. I really liked this portion  This creates a barrier because the lost literature was information that could’ve been used to better understand the art from this time. “ I felt that sentence was spot on, with the loss of certain pieces of literature, we not only are then limiting ourselves to really learning and or knowing about what could have been important to understanding the pieces of art that were present during this time, we also kind of lose that insight and that perception of what the art itself value wise holds. I think a lot of art in today’s world has still not yet been found, and or been lost which then brings forth again that dilemma of really gaining a better insight and perception of what the world really could hold and or have as a total. 

I to found that I admired the greek art, and the variety that was present. I think i probably would prefer the more like complex pieces of architecture, and other pieces of art simply because I feel it holds more “dedication” then say something that may not be as detailed. 

I loved the idea of greek mythology, I feel that the variety and ability to have god’s and goddesses simply allows females that ability to feel kind of equal to men, and yes as expressed above, shows the importance of women in their society because it’s true. Throughout time we struggled with that ability of equality and females being more than just housewives, or in our society we did and even though yes during this time frame that was present, it at least didn’t have one sole god (like the christian god) and opens up that then idea to expanding upon this analogy as a whole. 

I feel I get entirely what your saying about the art  in general and the interesting people that they were because they did in fact put their own perspective on that form of art.

Great post!!

Blog Post 10

This week we are on chapter 8 which is the Art of the Etruscans. This era existed from 1000-100B.C and is important in western history because it is related to Greece and Rome. 

To begin some of the art is lost from the Etruscan civilization was lost and it happened to be majority of all the literature and writing. What only exists is some writing in the form of religious texts. This creates a barrier because the lost literature was information that could’ve been used to better understand the art from this time. The large source of information that experts have are from the burial tombs because they left them untouched and they were built nicely because they were the tombs of people. Although much of the architecture has collapsed due to the material used to make them, many other visual arts were able to be discovered and were helpful in the act of understanding exactly what the art means. 

Art of the Etruscans was highly influenced and almost a reflection of the Greek art in that time. For example, from the understanding of experts the large scale buildings that were discovered were tall and had open air sanctuaries much like buildings from Greece the only difference was some of the processes and material used to create these. I personally like the construction of the Apollo at Veii because although it looks simple the architecture is solid and not to extra. Moving on to the pottery and sculptures I find these to the be the most interesting because personally I really admire Greek art and the Etruscan art is basically there own perceptions of Greek art. What is left of the surviving art from this time shows that their economy was striving with bronze because much of their sculptures are made of bronze. I like that there sculptures were mainly bronze because when you think of bronze you think that is less value of gold and silver but these sculptures shows that sometimes its not the material that matters. For example I really appreciate there depictions of the greek mythology in the Wounded Chimera sculpture and I personally because if that sculpture was made of gold or silver I would still appreciate what it is not what its made of. 

Moving onto the women in this society they had more rights and their attitudes were much different towards women in Etruscan times. Depicted from their art women actually were in public life more and were more respected than in Greek times. The art reflects that there was more emphasis on females because in their art there were more mother goddess and women would dominate men by being older and more powerful. A perfect example of this would be from the scene of the back of a mirror from Volterra which shows a Herakles being breast fed by the Goddess Uni. I feel as though this shows the importance of women in their society whereas in some cultures woman wouldn’t even get a sculpture of themselves. 

The Etruscan people were very interesting people because they kind of did everything as their own like their religion and language. Although it would seem everything they did was original they still had influence from Greece which reflected a lot in their art. I think they are very interesting people because they put there own perspective on some of the Greek art. 

[kayym1593-blog]

I found it rather interesting that you recognized an array of poems. I did not. History in general was not a strong suit for me. I personally didn’t do very well with the classes themselves, and have no recollection of learning about greek or different aspects of it at all. But I think it is really unique that you have. I also believe that literature is art. I personally do not agree with your statement about how many do not believe literature is art, because I personally feel many do believe it is, it is just not as emphasized or talked about as much as an art as say painting. I think in general, in society today, what is perceived as being art has expanded a lot. I personally have seen many have that perception and I personally do as well. I am a writer. Therefore, I get how writing is an art. Without books, or any types of literature, TV movies and or plays would have never come to fruition, which in turn gives that insight to how literature in a way opens up doors to an array of different art that currently is. But I agree that literature is art, because it really is. 

I also loved the diversity of art amongst the different types of art that was present in this time frame. Such as the ones you listed above. I do think there is beauty in architecture as well, but I personally just am not as drawn to it as I am to say different paintings, or other types of art that is present in the world today. 

I too found the podcast really interesting. Especially the talk about how beauty reflects art, and how it kind of relates to how we as people perceive things in today’s world. I think that is a rather cool concept as well. 

Great post! 

Week 8 Blog

Ancient Greece is another part of history that I have some knowledge of but that is about it. To begin I recognize some of the known epic poems that have came from this time. I remember learning and reading The Iliad attributed to Homer, and also The Odyssey. These are both important and interesting epic poems and they are a very known and still hold meaning even this many years later because I learned about them in literature. I think a lot of literature is forgotten as art and majority of people think art is creating pictures but through these epic poems a picture is painted. I believe literature is art because through the experiences in the writing it is connecting with a person and it gives pleasure to others just by words. Much like painting and drawing it is a form of expression that humans show and literature is also expression through writing

The styles that come from Ancient Greece pottery consist of The Geometric Style which has rectilinear patterns and is pleasing to the eye because of the lines forming rectangles in a smooth movement but yet has harsh corners. Next the Orientalizing style has more curvilinear patterns than the geometric style and has geometric borders around the pictures in the art. I find these more pleasing because in my eyes it looks like a more developed geometric style piece of art. Archaic Style has more of a darker feel and I find the famous piece Achilles and Ajax playing a Board Game to be very pleasing because it gives a deep contrast in the art on the vases. Moving on to the sculpture styles there is the Archaic style which seems to be influenced by Egyptian techniques. The Statue of a Kouros definetly has the Egyptian feel because in the face it reminds me of the faces in the Palette of Narmer. In the early classical style the way the human was sculpted changed and takes on a different approach. The human sculptures look more detailed and more realistic. Finally the classical style is what is considered to be the golden age of greek art and is the some of the best looking sculptures. This time reflects on the intellectual achievements and shows how much their art really matters. When talking about Greece everyone knows you cant leave out their architecture. When looking at some of the architecture still standing I see it as a message to other countries. They made huge structures with large pillars that just scream power and riches. 

In the podcast I liked how they used beauty as much as they can. It gives a sense of how this art from this time actually looks and how much emotion comes from just viewing this art. It also talks about what beauty meant to people in Greece and how attractiveness played a large role in how they perceived beauty. This idea of beauty really reflects in the art from this time because most of all their art is very pleasing to look and that is what beauty is to them. 

[kayym1593-blog]

Week 8 Blog

This week was a reading of chapter seven, which went into more depth of the Art of Ancient Greek. I found it rather interesting how immediately it is expressed that, “The Aegean civilizations were known only in myth and legend until the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries.” (Para 1. Pg. 83) This chapter delves into the art history and a little more about it’s background. It touches on Government, Culture, Philosophy, An array of different forms of art (literature, painting, sculpture/pottery, media/architect.) I found this chapter really interesting, simply because the concept of how the Aegan civilization wasn’t even really founded or understood as being real until the twentieth centuries as expressed above.

I personally felt that this chapter was really broad on what it touched upon and why. I think understanding the background of a certain culture, and how say different things were ran and came to was really neat. It kind of allowed me to gain a perception of how and where say certain cutlures of today gained this perception.

I think the biggest portion of this chapter that I personally felt a connection or drawing to was the philosophy, and the concept of PLATO and his perception of artists among other things. I never knew much of a background about Plato, Aristotle, or Socrates or where they came from or what really inspired them, but now I kind of have a better understanding to it all. There teachings, there ideas, came forth due to how things were ran and how things were perceived during this time frame. Two among many great pieces that plato himself wrote, sparked during this era. “Greek philosophers discussed the nature of government at length. Foremost among them was Plato (c. 427–347 BC.) His writings include The Republic and The Laws, which describe an ideal state (Para. 5. Pg 84).” That in itself was really unique to read. In a way how things were ran, sparked a whole new movement among society and the world as a whole. Plato, Socrates and Aristotle are very well known today, and their legacies have lived on for years since then. Which in some way brings forth a whole new perception and concept to opinion and philosophers and life overall. In a way their opinions, due to how things were during these time frames, opened up a new door to an entirely new lifestyle and some form of art in some unique way or another. I personally feel I relate a lot to philosophers, and in a past life I may have been one.

Another part that really stuck out to me was, “The aversion to tyranny led to the establishment of independent city-states. Each city-state, or polis, required male citizens to participate in its government.” (Para. 5. Pg 84) This section itself, which was mentioned prior to the aspect of Plato himself, was really intriguing to learn. Simply because I never really understood how city and or states came to be known. And just gaining a deeper perception of this specifically allowed me to gain a better understanding of it all. This chapter itself also kind of gives a deeper insight to the idea of how woman overall at the time didn’t exactly get the same “treatment” or ability to say “free-will” as the men did. It seems in an array of these chapters that it speaks highly of “kings” and “men” being the rulers and or the sole decision makers, while woman are kind of just pushed off as simply being present but nothing more. The quote itself “Man is the measure of all things.” (Pg. 85) In itself is kind of that point made. Even though “man” can be defined as humans, I think in this context it was meant to emphasize the concept of “men” being the measure of everything, and females simply being present to do as told. “They ventured outside the house mainly for religious processions and festivals restricted to women, and they could not vote or hold public office.” (Pg. 85 Para 1.) This concept of time, simply shows how much and how far we have come since then. It just is really eye opening to see and to grasp that this truly was a reality for many woman during this time, and it truly makes the concept of feminism, and the “equal rights of women movement” as well as many others, more understanding. I think it’s just really reliving to look back on these times, and to see that we as females have adapted and gotten well beyond it. It is sad to simply think that the females were that basic stereotype of being that “housewife” and property of men. In a way it is rather disgusting. “Once married, a woman became her husband’s responsibility. She had no independent status, and her life was devoted to childbearing and looking after the family and household.” (Pg. 85 Para 2) I am just really thankful that we have come so far since.

           In concept of art, and the art history of the Greece, I think in general it kind of opened up a door to a different way of “art” a different form of perception for many. I think it is really unique how much art has expanded since, and how much we have adapted from this all. “The literary legacy of Greece is one of the most remarkable in Western civilization.” (Pg. 85)

It’s also kind of nice to see that art then, even in a different area is not much different then it is today, just more evolved. But I did find it rather interesting how much certain pieces of art were “praised” and held much more meaning to say greeks than it would to many in the world today. Such as the sculptures. A lot of the art in general was created, and molded after those who held a higher status, either as being a god, or king, among many others. Which I find interesting, but also kind of stereotypical. Yet I also have to have the understanding that during this time, that is how things were and with reading it, it is simply a lot different now then it was then.

           The podcast that we listened to as well, I found really cool to hear. Just understanding the different words and the way they are expressed and how depending on how it is pronounced they hold different meanings and or hold different accents that in turn make the word hold a different value and or definition of. It was just interesting to hear this as an opening, because I never really understood how much different words and different ways of pronouncing it can in turn make the word something entirely different than what it really was. I liked how he emphasized on how everyone has different views on what is say beautiful compared to another. Which is really true. Perception is kind of everything in life overall. So it was really cool to hear about how he emphasized upon that, and simply his context of how among different sexes, female and male, different terms are more so used toward one than the other, which was also a really unique perception.

“There were people who were sexually attracted to statues.” This quote was pretty comical, but also extremely odd. The podcast overall kind of just went into the detail of beauty standards and different meanings that are held among others, and how in turn different pieces of art have created these different perspectives overall to an array of people and how in some way subconsciously each of those past artifacts kind of molded and shaped those in society today to have a specific perception of what “beauty” really is. It kind of places the “beauty standards” and where they came from throughout history more clear. The podcast was really interesting to hear, and I really enjoyed the comparisons and the concept of relating it to psychological relations to different things.

[kayym1593-blog]

I too found this chapter to be really unique and rather inspiring. I think it was rather interesting to gain a better perspective on exactly how things were in Ancient Egypt and how in some way they play a major role upon who we are today and how culture affects art in more ways then one initially would have assumed. I personally didn’t think it affected it that much, but upon reading this I can get a better perspective of that. 

“ This stuff is also fascinating to me because when they built these huge pyramids and sculptures they were not playing around.” This sentence was so spot on and literally like you pulled the thought right out of my mind! Yes! I think pyramids are seriously so interesting to see and admire. And the fact that during this time period, they had such little resources, yet still thought up and then made this a thing is like magical to me. Simply because it would have taken a heck of a lot of effort, and dedication to truly creating such a beautiful piece of art that as you expressed is still standing to this day. It’s insane. Most art with such history gets worn and damaged over time, yet these things still stand. Which is really cool. 

I think that is cool that you have a necklace that resembles there culture, and or their form of art. I too found the paintings very pleasing. It really gave a good imagery for those who were not present within the time and really opens the perception to a much deeper one.

Really good post. I enjoyed reading your opinion and what you though about it, and its really cool to find that alot of your thoughts aligned with mine among others! Great job

Week 6 Blog

This week in chapter 5 we are focusing on Ancient Egypt. Egyptian art to me is interesting because of how much archeologists know about this art. It is common in our culture to have some knowledge of this topic because of how much it is covered in shows and movies in entertainment. I don’t believe it is a coincidence that it is in a lot of movies because it is actually interesting stuff. 

The chapter begins talking about pharaohs and how Egypt was essentially ruled by kings and queens in other words royalty. The first piece of art in the chapter is The Palette of Nermer. This was a slate of stone that was carved into and it is said to be used to project the pharaohs powers. I find this piece interesting because right from the beginning you can assess that the piece of art is spiritual and is used for more then just a decorations. I find the beliefs in this culture to be very interesting because their beliefs are more than just what is happening in the physical world. They believe in spiritual powers and believe in the gods which is fascinating. The art on this slate has a conceptual form of the human body and it also contains images of conceptual animals. Not to have a stereotype but when I think of Egyptian Art I think of this art on the slate because it has images of the Pharaoh and the gesture of the humans on the slate are how they are portrayed in entertainment.   

The architecture in Ancient Egypt is also well known and is talked about to this day. This stuff is also fascinating to me because when they built these huge pyramids and sculptures they were not playing around. The Pyramids at Giza was the perfect example of how important royalty was in the culture because they were built as tombs for the pharaohs. These were also pleasing to the eye because of how large they are and how they are still able to be standing to this day. I bet it would be breathtaking to see these pyramids being built and also seeing the finished brand new architecture. The Colossal statue of Khafre was also another reflection of how the culture was in Ancient Egypt. This statue was a large sphinx which is a form of a lion to this culture. They guarded the entrances of the pyramids in a spiritual way.   

The paintings from this culture were also very eye pleasing because they were much like the carvings from this time. To me what made these better was the use of color. This really made these pieces of art interesting because it gives a better sense of the what they actually wore and what color the things were that they wore. I find it fascinating that these pictures also contain symbols and give more meaning to the actual art because that means this art wasn’t just created to be created. It is interesting that I have a pendant on my necklace which is the Ankh and this symbol is actual from Egypt and is found in some carvings and paintings. 

This chapter was interesting to me because it shows how art reflects much of the culture and gives us a closer look into their art perspectives. 

[kayym1593-blog]

Week 6 Chapter 5 Blog

Chapter five was a basic over view of Ancient Egypt. It went far into the depths of the history it posseses/possessed, the culture that was present during, the different beliefs of each culture, and there perception of art and all that was present in the different areas of Egypt overall. I found this chapter interesting merely based upon all the in depth history that is discussed. Egyptian history is rather interesting to me because it has always been something that has been widely known and talked about to this day. According to the book, “Egypt, in northeast Africa, was the home of one of the most powerful and longest-lasting civilization of the ancient world.” (Pg. 51 Para 1) Which in some way, makes you wonder if Egyptian culture, was truly the “beginning of human existence” overall.

Upon reading each of the chapters we have so far, it really allows a very diverse understanding of the different cultures that are present and the different forms of art they bring forth to the world that still hold much value today. I found it really cool to really see how much different Ancient Egypt was “ruled” compared to the others. For example, “In Egypt however, the kings were considered Gods” (Pg. 51 Para.7) Although it’s probably odd I think the way they ruled, and the history of the kings, and the gods and how they “ran things” overall and how it tied into the value of art as a whole, was the most interesting of the whole chapter. Simply gaining a deeper insight to how they ruled and why I found really interesting to read. It kind of brings forth a new perspective and allows you to kind of see and understand how Egyptian history could have played a major role upon how other religions sparked, and how others perceived certain people. For example in Christianity they have a “god” one god, while in Egypt they have many, and the Gods they have are not merely energy, or an image of an older man sitting above the clouds, they are actual people. Which is really cool because in some way it kinds of opens up that perspective of how different religions gained there insight, or the mere comparison to that and how I among many perceive things in todays world.

Now in retrospect to the history of the art in Egypt and how it all started, or the different pieces of art that was created merely revolved around those they for saw as being these gods. Also known as “The Palette of Narmer.” “The links between divine and earthly power can be seen in an important ritual object, namely the Palette of Narmer” (Pg. 52 Para. 9-10).  In Chapter 5 figure 5.1 it gives an image of what this is, and the image that is depicted, is rather interesting.

This art to me is just really odd, but it also brings forth some sort of a unique story that you can literally see by looking at the image present. Just seeing how they initially praised these rulers, and allowed them to have such an impact on their lives is really unique. It makes me question in some way, where did this idea come from? Did they merely one day decide that someone would be considered a God? Or was it “dreamt” up as in say how Christianity was. It truly just allows you to delve into a whole new world. I have always been rather intrigued by Greek mythology, whether they are connected or not is beyond me but the perception of there being goddesses, and gods compared to just one over the other really gives a better insight to how Egyptians thought and how it has played a major role in many lives today.

Further more into the chapter it goes into more detail about the variety of “art” that was created in Ancient Egypt and dives into that history. Such as Pyramids, and the sacredness they held to these people during this time. “The most monumental architectural expression of the Egyptian pharaoh’s power was the pyramid, his burial place and zone of passage into the afterlife.” (Pg. 54 Para. 10) This specific architecture when one looks upon it today, is extremely complex, “The pyramid was a resting place for the king’s body, and burial chambers were constructed either in the rock under the pyramid or in the pyramid itself.” (Pg. 54 Para 10) and the ability to create these in a time frame as such with such little resources, simply shows the power of the human mind overall. “The chambers were connected by a maze of passages, including dead ends designed to foil grave robbers.” (Pg. 54 Para 10) The ability, the resilience and strength we carry and the ability to create a beautiful piece of art simply by using the physical resources that make up who we are, is so inspiring to me and it is merely an interesting piece of history that brings forth a brighter awareness in the since of Ancient Egypt.

           I found it fairly peculiar how they spaced out the Kingdoms into the New, the old, and the middle. I thought that was rather unique. For why couldn’t they simply combine them all together? But regardless of, each kingdom had their own kind of art from Sculptures, to temples, to tombs, to paintings. Each kingdom held it’s own significance and gives a deeper insight to how and where certain art came forth in the world that we live in today. I think it is really cool that we were able to dive into the past yet again, and gain a deeper insight to the way people lived during this time period. It was also really cool to truly read upon the different types of art that they initially created and molded merely based upon what they found of significance. And comparing that to today’s world truly opens millions of doors to the real world of art, and what it is and how it holds different meanings to an array of different people depending upon their religion, culture, and mere area where they came from.

[kayym1593-blog]

I too found it really interesting to catch a glimpse into the past and what types of art were present within these time periods. It was rather intriguing simply due to the fact that these were dated from so long ago, which is really interesting just to see and understand that yes, in fact art did spark/spawn from somewhere in the world! I always simply thought it just appeared. Someone really smart started utilizing their creativity and it just started like an epic movement of art overall. It’s just really unique to think about because in some way, there art inspired an array of others to create their own. And they all in some essence go hand in hand with the other.

It’s really cool that you mentioned Jericho and the aspect of how archaeologists were able to understand how and why things were placed the way they were, and the uniqueness that it brings overall. It’s super neat to see how much we have truly adapted as a world. Like every day someone learns something new, which in turn develops a new perspective and brings forth an array of inspiration in many different aspects.

I too found it really cool that art holds an amazing purpose.. Just the idea that we have grown so much, we have learned from ancestors, and utilize the teachings they ultimately created to allow us to live as we do now.. Like language wasn’t even a thing how long ago, it’s just super unique to think about. I too find it really cool that art as a whole holds so much importance, and it is really sad that some people overlook the beauty of what art can bring as specified such as “writing in books” Many don’t see the importance of it, and in some way we kind of are lucky and should be overly appreciative of it all simply because without it being invented some time ago we wouldn’t be able to “reap the rewards” that it has brought. 

I too feel I have a better understanding of that perception and of art overall as you stated above. 

Your post was very thorough and very thought out, and I really like how you went into detail about the different eras you noticed and explained more upon each. It helps others who read your blog gain a better understanding, and it allows another to kind of get a glimpse into how another perceives it. Great post though!

Week 4 Blog

Chapter 4 was interesting to me because it talked about the history of certain art and the periods that it came from. A lot of this art was some of the original types of art like writing, carving, and even architecture. The chapter talks about the reasoning behind these forms of art. Most of the pieces of art mentioned in the chapter are very old pieces of art from B.C time. This chapter is basically a overview of the certain people from certain times and what they produced as far as art. 

To begin the some of the Neolithic sites mentions were the site of Jericho and Catal Huyuk. These locations both contained buildings that held corpses and even painted walls and some areas that are said to be shrines. I find it very interesting that archeologists are able to make the assumptions of the intended purposes of these buildings even tho they are thousands of years old. For example archeologist are able to find out that the buildings in Catal Huyuk were made without streets and the holes and little windows were used as ventilation from the oven. 

During the early Dynastic Period statues were created in the Abu Temple at Tell Asmar. Experts are unsure if these statues were supposed to be in a group but they all seem to share characteristics. For example some of them hold cups but the men are bare in the chest while women have robes over one shoulder. One interesting thing pointed out about these statues are the hierarchical proportions. I never thought about hierarchical proportions until reading this section but it makes complete sense that the size of the statues shows the status of the donor and how much money was donated. If a person owned a large statue this would reflect how much they paid for it. Its kind funny that back in this time a person received what they paid for. Today its unlikely to get what you pay for. 

One of the big pictures that I interpreted from this chapter was art truly does have a purpose. For people like us, who enjoy the nature and meaning behind art, realize that as humans art and creation is a natural part of life. If you were to speak to someone who could care less about art they are going to say that art really serves no purpose and can’t help humans but this chapter shows that there is actually meaning behind these. For starters many people are religious and will stand behind their religion strongly. Some people may be religious but also have the opinion that art doesn’t matter. But if you look back at the history without art, religion could have been lost throughout history. Art was able to continue the religion through statues and paintings and even writings in books like The Quran or The Vedas. These are all forms of art and some people do not realize the importance of it. In the end after reading this chapter my knowledge towards periods and people who created art has grown and I have a better understanding of really how important art is. 

[kayym1593-blog]

Week 4 Blog

Chapter 4 Blog Post

The summary of this chapter, ties into the history of different periods that were present during this time such as the Neolithic era, the Mesopotamia Era, and those amongst these different eras as well, such as the Anatolia/Hitties, It delves into all of those that were present among these eras such as The Scythians, and the Achaemenid Persia. It goes into the history of the art that they brought forth to the world, and how each of these contributed to all the art that we see and experience today. It also gives a major background of how each of these forms of art contributed to an array of art that we see today, including writing. “It was the ancient Near East that people first invented writing-a momentous development in human history.” (Para 1.Pg. 33)

This chapter touches on how each culture developed their own form of art, and how each of them even though “worlds apart” were relevant and similar to the other.

First it touches upon the Neolithic Era. The Neolithic Era is one that was developed over “four  thousand years earlier in the Near East than in Europe.” (Para 2. Pg. 33) In a way, the Neolithic era opened doors to a perception that created an array of different systems that we are aware of today, and helped “contribute to the rise of increasingly complex urban cultures.” (Para.2 Pg. 33) The Neolithic era, helped spark an array of art, that we see today. It related to the history of architecture that was built and created during this time, which is something we in turn see and use today often. The two most known places are Jericho and Catal Huyuk according to Pg. 34. It then delves into the idea of how writing was brought forth to another’s awareness, and the steps they took to getting there. “The earliest known written language comes from Summer, in outhern Mesopotamia, and persisted…” (Pg. 37 Para 2.) Upon further reading you simply gain a deeper insight to these different cultures, and the things they excelled in and what they admired most with art as a whole.

Upon reading this chapter, it allowed me to get a broader perception of how different people, different cultures truly brought forth a form of beauty in each of the aspects of art they created. It allowed me to really kind of travel back in time to seeing and understanding how each of these eras grew, adapted, and then progressed into the world we see and know today. The diversity of art that was present then, has truly expanded and excelled beyond our years in Todays world, and that in itself is really admiring.

With reading this chapter, it allowed me to kind of get a better understanding to why different cultures made art in the manner they did. It shows that art then in some way held a lot more meaning to what it may now to certain people. Although I believe art has expanded, and diversified so much more, especially with the use of wording, and language overall. I myself even find questions arising to where all these words sparked from and who created them and how art as a whole even played a big part within it.

I always seen writing as an art, but I guess I never really gave it as much thought as it deserved. Especially with the array of diverse work that is available not only in image but in wording as well. I also never truly knew that the near east initially invented the first known “epic poetry, written history, religious texts, and economic records.” (Pg.33 Para.1) It’s just really cool to read upon because I never really gave it too much thought, I just thought it kind of like appeared as crazy as that sounds.

I never truly understood that certain areas of the world, were the sole “inventors” of different forms of language, words, or art as a whole so that idea itself was really unique for me to read upon. Although this chapter merely gave more insight to the Ancient near east and the array of different art that was created in each of these time frames, times well before our years, dating back to “6000 B.C.” (Pg. 50) Like that in itself is really interesting to me. It kind of makes me curious about these time frames as well, I always found them rather confusing. They start as a “higher number” then initially deteriorate as time progresses. It was a really cool read overall because it allowed me to get an understanding of the different eras and cultures present in the world, ones that existed well before I was even born. I love art, so being able to read upon the history of these and when they flourished most, and all they had brought forth to the world. Really allowed me to gain a much more deeper connection to it overall. So it was a really cool perception to gaze upon.

[kayym1593-blog]

Your post was put beautifully. I too had a hard time deciphering the images from the Chauvet cave and the Lascaux cave. I think the message you expressed about the image you saw at first compared to what it truly was, is really unique and put beautifully. It gives a deeper insight to your views, and really allows me as one with different views to get a glimpse into how art in general can be seen differently through an array of different eyes and can speak to another on different levels. So that sentence itself, really brings forth that awareness, and then makes you wonder too what those who created the art really were perceiving when they did so. Or if others who may have stumbled a crossed it in that time era may have thought or perceived. Was it similar? Or was it different? did many who may have encountered it get the message that was being relayed or is that the beauty of it, the mystery? It truly opens a portal to millions of questions that one can ask.

Your comment about the flinstones, I too feel that it can remind one of that. Not in the essence of the cartoon itself, just the idea of the time frame it was based, and the “Cave man” stuff they used at the time to create homes, or cars or whatever else it is that was present and available to them prior. 

After looking at more pictures of caves, I realized there are more pictures of animals than anything else. I guess I do not have an answer why that is, but I think it is because most of the people back then really liked animals like we do right now. I think it is also very interesting that people were trying to make art without even realizing it then. I guarantee the people who were making these had no intention of getting attention for their work.

This paragraph speaks wonders. I too found the usage and images of animals was a bit odd, and made me question it entirely. For I had no idea either. I think it’s cool that you feel that at the time they didn’t realize they were making art, what then do you feel that they were thinking after seeing it? Do you truly think they were just bored or do you think they knew what they were doing and wanted to leave some form of an imprint of their lives, and what they saw behind? 

It is really cool though that you saw it in that way. 

This chapter too opened my eyes more so to the history of art, compared to art in general. I personally did not like the venus figurines, but your message upon it was rather, interesting to read. Your point upon why they didn’t do a male body, is a legit question, because yes as you expressed why didn’t they? I too felt that in a way these figurines could be meant as an insult in some way. Hence why I didn’t touch upon it. I just felt the idea of “poking fun” in some way (Even if not meant to) at a bigger female, was wrong. Hence why I steered clear from! Great post otherwise! 

Blog Post Week 3

          With the thought of cave paintings, the first thing that comes to mind is the Flintstones. I know this is a college course and I know the Flintstones are not appropriate for it. But, with a little background in art I have, I believe it could be acceptable. When the characters are inside the house, it is very interesting looking at the designs of the house. My favorite cave painting after doing some further research is a picture of lions in Chauvet Cave, France. When I first looked at this cave picture, I thought it looked like cows or horses. I then had to look at the title to realize it was lions. Growing up in Northeast Iowa, I have always really connected to horses and cows. I think this contributes to why I saw it as a stampede of horses. After looking at more pictures of caves, I realized there are more pictures of animals than anything else. I guess I do not have an answer why that is, but I think it is because most of the people back then really liked animals like we do right now. I think it is also very interesting that people were trying to make art without even realizing it then. I guarantee the people who were making these had no intention of getting attention for their work. They were most likely just bored and needed something to do, so they took rocks and stones and started carving into the side of the cave.

          The second thing I found interesting was the Venus Figurines. They look extremely weir in my opinion. When I read the word at first, I thought it was going to be some type of planet looking picture. A female’s upper body is not what I expected at all. Not trying to bring a sexist view into this blog post, but I am very confused on why it is a female’s body and not a male. Since men were the rulers, I would have thought they would have sculpted a man’s body figure. It is very interesting that they did not do it that way. I also think the figures could be like a “joke” in a way. Maybe they were trying to mimic the female’s body because it was different than a male. But, I also think they were being respectful by not trying to put a face on the figures. If they would have put a face on, it would be some sort of way of public humiliation. They could have used this as a punishment for people if they broke the law. The oldest figure is the Venus of Hohle Fels. This figure was found inside a cave and is believed to be 30,000 to 40,000 years old! It is insane they are able to replicate this figurine to make it look like they just made it that long ago. This chapter really opened my eyes to art. I do not have a huge interest in art, but I have a great time looking at super old paintings and sculptures.