20+ bisexual -- If you're under 18 go away -- fandoms: GoW/TSP/Chzo Mythos/RaM/DEDA Files/Malevolent podcast/TMA -- inbox always open for requests/thought experiments/compliments/etc
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
Text
the "chat is a pronoun" discourse is captivating to me because it goes so far beyond ordinary misinformation
like imagine if suddenly there was a wave of posts saying that Dogs Are Birds, like "omg you guys i just realized dogs are actually birds!!!" and any time anybody said "theyre mammals, not birds" dozens of people would get super defensive about it and make snide condescending posts/comments like "KNOWLEDGE is knowing that dogs arent birds, WISDOM is knowing that taxonomy is fake and all organisms are whatever you want them to be forever, peace and love on planet earth," and they would keep posting about how Dogs Are Totally Birds because "well dogs are majestic and have beautiful voices, like birds" and if you pointed out that those qualities are immeasurable (& have nothing to do with being a bird) and that metric could categorize most animals (& several things that arent animals) as 'birds' they would call you a gatekeeping elitist and say "let people enjoy things" or some thesaurused equivalent, and maybe someone would also say "we're just having a Laff, it's just a fun game dont be so Serious" but they (and a non-insignificant number of other people) otherwise speak as if they believe with conviction that Dogs Really Are Birds, and this is Really Big & Exciting News because Dogs Are The First 4-Legged Bird, and then when people who know biology made posts explaining in-depth what taxonomy is & why dogs arent birds theyd start getting asks like "what about cats, are cats birds??" "are hamsters birds?" "what about sharks??" "i think flies are birds because they have wings." and then imagine this all persisted for more than half a year
3K notes
·
View notes
Text
Driving around my town trying to find one single burger just one burger or a hot dog but Unfortunately everythings just rubble and twisted scaffolding upstretched and rotting and theres shit on fire and a big black ass sky
8K notes
·
View notes
Text
Mutuals I’d like to go to the renaissance faire with
2K notes
·
View notes
Note
I get the reasoning, but I still think not giving John his own body in the Dark World for s6 was a missed opportunity. He already had his own body there! Twice!! And I think giving them what they want (i.e. separation & full autonomy) in the worst circumstances (i.e. the Dark World) is a great way to let them test out whether they want to remain body-sharers while still giving them plenty of reason to stay by each other's side.
I know they alluded to remaining together as they are in s5, but John's personhood is so limited when he's stuck in Arthur's head.... it doesn't feel fair to him to keep him there. (Especially if he remains even after Arthur dies? So he'd just be linked to a corpse? At what point would he be released from Arthur's remains? And would he even survive? And I still don't get how he was able to project himself in The Witch ep if his projection drains Arthur's life-force and the guy had none left to give, being dead and all.)
.
13 notes
·
View notes
Text
is there anything funnier than somebody who has a tumblr account trying to seem like theyre above fandom
#had someone accuse me of being a fandom blogger.#uhhh i mean. yes there are satanists at the devils sacrament#why the hell are YOU here if youre not a fandom blogger???
98K notes
·
View notes
Text
fuck yesssss they just gavwe me early access to all of the future grief i could possibly imagine for myself 😍
9K notes
·
View notes
Note
rlly bugs me when ppl say Arthur is aromantic based on him not loving Bella. like it's such a weird way to spin the fact that his selfish ass planned to abandon his pregnant wife. you're reading queerness into the super common behavior of a shitty straight man who just didn't want to be tied down by an accidental pregnancy. he feels better knowing she didnt love him not bc he can't feel romantic love but bc he thinks that that somehow makes his objectively horrible behavior (literally getting drunk while she was giving birth!) more excusable. he feels better bc now he can call his dead wife's dad his dad, bc even though he never loved his wife he should get to claim her family as his anyway. "omgggg aro king" girl thats just a misogynist
.
36 notes
·
View notes
Text
y’all remind yourselves your account is your space. you’re not a performance. you’re not annoying by being yourself. if people aren’t into it they can leave. you’re not obligated to please anyone, especially at the cost of your personal expression. the worst thing you can do for your online enjoyment is to filter or censor yourself.
58K notes
·
View notes
Text

4K notes
·
View notes
Text
problems are mounting.. it is time to solve everything at once
5K notes
·
View notes
Text
Guy who has heard other guys refer to their wives as "ball and chain" and "battle-axe" and wrongfully assumed you can refer to your wife as any medieval weapon: oh there's my beautiful Lucerne hammer
68K notes
·
View notes
Text
I'm fucking dying at this page someone shared on Bluesky.
Behold, the Embroidery Trouble Shooting Guide that forgot to close its <h3> tags.
54K notes
·
View notes