loudlytransparenttrash

[loudlytransparenttrash]

What are your thoughts on the word "cis"?

it’s an incredibly stupid invention by the gender cult to validate and normalize the total corruption of biological sex. Using this term in any context is playing along with their insanity.

[loudlytransparenttrash]

i’d love to drug you & string you up like a freshly-killed deer, then flay you limb from limb. if i got bored, i’d rape your anus with a knife for a little while, then go back to flaying you. you deserve nothing less.

Put down your pentagram, take your meds and go outside, you’ll feel a lot better after.

[loudlytransparenttrash]

You have the most ignorant and bigoted page ever. @staff this is what you promote?

Promoting free speech? How horrifying!

[loudlytransparenttrash]

Thoughts on Vance for VP pick? I didn’t really like him at first but the more interviews he does the more I like him.

He was a smart choice. He’s in many ways the polar opposite of Trump in terms of background (and age) but perfectly aligned in values and message. When “weird” is the only angle his opponents can take, like a bunch of dumb 90s high school bullies - you probably have the right guy.

[loudlytransparenttrash]

Long time follower. I hope you come back. I really miss reading your we'll thought out opinions. It's actually really refreshing to see like minded people on here.

I miss these interactions too! I appreciate your support and encouragement. Feel free to reach out any time :)

[loudlytransparenttrash]

I miss you. Hope you're okay.

Thank you for your sweet message! I’ve been off living life, I continue to receive messages over the last two years and I’ve always missed interacting with y’all! So I’m making a small return and hoping everyone is doing well and keeping safe!

[loudlytransparenttrash]

Thoughts on the 2024 election?

I’d like to think the outcome of our elections can return to the will of the people. If so, we all know the answer is obvious. But knowing what they’re capable of, I’m not holding my breath!

[loudlytransparenttrash]

2 years since your last shitty post and the only reason I even know who you are is people pissing on your head in expert fashion. This website rules.

Thank you for waking me up from my slumber. Now try prove one thing I’ve ever said as being factually incorrect. I’ll wait, knowing full well I’ll be waiting forever

[loudlytransparenttrash]

Following the SCOTUS leak of an early draft of a majority decision that would overturn Roe v. Wade, we haven’t seen such panic since Bubba Wallace spotted a piece of string.

The pro-abortion reaction to the leak revealed how utterly confusing it is to be a liberal these days. Late last year, the AP revised its stylebook to instruct its writers that the term “pregnant woman” is “non-inclusive” because it ignores “pregnant men.” Journalists were ordered to only use “pregnant people,” “pregnant individuals,” and “those who are pregnant.”

But now there’s a problem: With Roe on the line, they need to present abortion as a women’s issue and only a women’s issue. As the TERF transphobe Gavin Newsom recently told a crowd of pro-abortionists last week, “If men could get pregnant, this wouldn’t even be a conversation.”

But… men can get pregnant, right?

Not so fast! The AP is here to dispel your confusion. The stylebook was updated yet again, this time instructing reporters to never dare say “men can get pregnant” only in relation to abortion. When it comes to other situations, yes, men can get pregnant. But when it comes to news stories about abortion, no, men cannot get pregnant. Got it?

If that doesn’t make sense to you, it’s because you're a bigot. Your superiors understand that uttering the word “abortion” erases male pregnancy, while the word “healthcare” brings it back. Magic! 

[loudlytransparenttrash]

Two female inmates in New Jersey have found themselves pregnant. How could this be? Every inmate is a woman, and none had any interactions with outsiders or male guards. Turns out, it’s thanks to the ACLU forcing the state’s only all-women’s prison to house male inmates who say they are women. Now the prison houses 27 delightful men in wigs. The baby daddy of the knocked up duo is serving 30 years for the manslaughter of his foster father. Another of the trans-fers, “Sonia Doe,” not only won the right to impregnate women in his cell, he also received a $125,000 settlement from the state for initially being refused a transfer to a women’s prison.

No word on why prison admins didn’t foresee that pregnancy would be the inevitable result of caging men with women. As for the ACLU, which apparently now considers it a “constitutional right” for men to be locked in cells with women, the reaction has been euphoric, declaring men in women's prisons is part of “New Jersey's commitment to keeping people in this prison safe." 

[loudlytransparenttrash]

Why are we accepting the term “people of color"? Especially in higher education, one would expect to strive for more precision in language and social analysis. First, are there really people with, and people without color? It creates a peculiar distinction. No longer are we diverse people, there are just two different types of people and that’s it?

One basic problem is identifying on which side of the line to place people. How do we label Greeks, Serbians, and blue-eyed Puerto Ricans? What if Koreans have lighter skin than Italians? Where do biracial people fit in? Do they, or do they not have “color"? 

The second problem is that this faux-identity group suggests a common character or experience that doesn’t exist. “People of color” come from countless different cultural, religious, linguistic, economic, political, and ethnic backgrounds. What important characteristics or experiences do Nigerians and Japanese individuals share? Within the United States, what is the shared experience of the son of wealthy Pakistani immigrants and the daughter of a black mechanic in Detroit? If there is no common identity and experience of “people of color”, then why is this phrase used at all?

It is lazy overgeneralizing, used only in the deeply flawed narrative of race relations. It suggests that all “POC” share the common trait of having faced unjust discrimination and bigotry by white people. Thus, America is made up of the people of no-color and everybody else are their victims.

While white hegemony has been real in America, an educated person should also know that members of dominant ethnic groups have routinely oppressed members of different groups around the world. There isn’t a single racial group that is more innocent or guilty than the other. Whether they choose to ignore it or they haven’t been taught it, students and “POC”-pushers desperately need to understand this about our world and its history.

But of course, as usual, there’s much to be gained by being a victim today. We find and demand a great deal of special treatments and privileges for the victim, and embrace new forms of discriminations against the victimizer. When the son of an Albanian refugee is cast in the oppressor class, while the daughter of a Korean stockbroker receives benefits for having “color,” we have a problem. How about let’s drop the “POC” category altogether and strive for more precision in our language, perspective in our history, and overcoming of the tribalism that separates us.

[loudlytransparenttrash]

If you ever come back, can you give an explanation as to why women choose different majors then men. And do you believe that women are brainwashed into femininity like radical feminists believe?

Some will say society or "the patriarchy" dictates the majors and professions we choose, but it's hard to ignore the innate biological differences between men and women and how these differences impact the decisions we make.

Studies into 55 different cultures from across the world, researching how gender and personality norms vary from society to society, found regardless of environment, women across all 55 cultures are more nurturing, risk-averse and emotionally expressive while men are more competitive, risk taking and emotionally flat.

Females are more inclined to be social, they want to form bonds and friendships, they want to work with people and living things. This could explain why women are flourishing in law, education, pharmacy, veterinary medicine, biology, childcare, humanities and social sciences. Males tend to be happier tinkering with machines, using tools, fixing stuff, working alone, longer hours and within more competitive environments. This could explain why men dominate in mechanical and electrical engineering, automotive and plumbing.

This study also showed the more prosperous and progressive the country, the greater these differences are. When we are given the freedom to choose whatever we want to do, in most cases, we go after what we naturally enjoy doing and what we are good at. Our career paths, behavioral patterns, preferences and ambitions stem from our biological differences and freedom, not the make-believe, invisible "patriarchy".

[loudlytransparenttrash]

Hello, are you okay? I really like your blog and haven’t seen you in a while

I'm back :)

[loudlytransparenttrash]

I saw the <3 health banner and I thought tumblr was about to give actually important information about how to take care of your heart (proper diet, exercise, etc)

Unfortunately not, so here's your reminder to take care of your heart

I’m not sure what banner you mean sorry, this was from a few weeks ago but yes, I’ll still share your PSA xx 

[loudlytransparenttrash]

A fair trial might have come to the same conclusion as we saw yesterday, but we’ll never know. There’s never been a greater campaign of jury intimidation and pressure from mob rule than this trial. It was made perfectly clear that the nation would be engulfed in flames and violence if the jurors expressed reasonable doubt. The jurors had everything but their names released publicly, including age, race, location and profession, knowing they would be exposed and forced into witness protection if they came to the wrong verdict. A severed pig’s head and blood was splattered over the house where a witness earlier lived and his former employer, a local police department, disavowed him over his testimony, a warning for anyone involved in the trial. The riots related to this case have already cost dozens of people their lives and the most damage in U.S. history, costing billions of dollars in damage, could you imagine what would happen if the jurors didn’t do what was expected of them? Minneapolis police put up razor wire and boards around their offices, so did cities all across the nation. National Guard troops were deployed all over in anticipation of the verdict announcement. The jurors knew that the media covering the trial were looking at their faces every day for three weeks and knew who they are, if the mobs found out too, if they came to the wrong verdict, their lives would be over. Every day they walked into a building fortified like a military compound. Officials from local mayors all the way up to the president of the United States made it clear that the only verdict they would accept was “guilty.” Politicians openly called for violence if the jury did not concede to mob rule. This case has been held up as a social justice torch to give politicians an excuse to pass almost anything and the mob an excuse to influence every future trial they can racialize. The pride that’s being taken in “this is just the beginning” of deciding the outcomes of trials before due process has run its course and making sure jurors follow through is a dangerous precedent being hailed as “justice.”

[loudlytransparenttrash]

Broke: Copaganda is a problem. Woke: Pressaganda is a problem. The press reporters and Hollywood deceive the public into thinking the Press Reporters are honorable, honest heroes when in reality they are sociopathic, division-making, bullying, lying, lap-dog charlatans who either do good by sheer accident, on orders from their masters, or take credit from REAL journalists who did good. Even in Mark Twain’s time, they are like that, as Mark said “If you read the newspaper, you're misinformed.”.

Our news media is completely broken. Its ideological bias and blatant corruption is either creating and worsening practically every single one of our country’s problems. Their stranglehold on information must end. Stop thinking of them as our mainstream news source when they don’t reflect or represent the majority of people and there’s nothing normal or conventional about what they are doing. Treat them just as they demand their enemies be treated: Lying and guilty until proven otherwise. Look beyond what’s constantly being smacked in our faces everywhere we turn and take pride in challenging the narrative. Otherwise, get out of the bubble altogether and find happiness in the real world.

[loudlytransparenttrash]

hey, what’s your opinion on hookup culture? it makes me think about how feminists focus a lot on female objectification and ignore that women can objectify men too. i’ve seen women who engage in hookup culture refer to men as pieces of meat and things like that, and i just don’t understand how they can’t see what men do to them is what they’re doing to men back.

Hookup culture is gross. As for the double standards in objectification, you’re right, both sexes “objectify” each other, it’s called nature and sexuality, we even objectify ourselves, as women there’s great power in wielding our sexuality. Yes, men are more likely to have sexual thoughts when looking at a woman they find attractive but that’s because men respond greater to visual sexual stimuli than women, this isn’t a product of misogyny or the patriarchy, it’s a natural difference between the sexes. Men are also routinely depicted as “eye candy” in sexual or objectified manners, on our screens, advertisements and personal conversations, but we’re told it’s not the same thing because there’s more male CEOs therefore there’s a power imbalance... so it can’t be objectifying to men... or something... We are also told that body image, beauty standards and expectations are all one-sided, that men aren’t affected at all by it, they’re instead exclusively the perpetrators of it. We already know women bully, criticize and shame each other far more than men, why don’t we ever talk about that when discussing women’s self-esteem disorders, it seems much more important than the “male gaze.” The objectification and over-sexualization in our culture isn’t even particularly male-driven. It’s a legacy of the feminist sexual revolution in which women are encouraged to unleash their sexuality through promiscuity, sex and nudity. Now it’s become empowering and justly to be a whore and abandon all values and morals, of course there will be increased sexual objectification and sexualization, how couldn’t there be? The solution isn’t toxic masculinity indoctrination, men and women simply need to start respecting ourselves and each other again and live our lives with morals and standards.