hi. im dante. he/they. đłď¸ââ§ď¸/đŽđł. my carrd! knowledge and curiosity and questions enthusiast. i do not tag triggers, please block me if me if my content bothers you. my nico/solangelo blog!!. also, my poetry blog. i reblog poetry, not write it. @hi_im_dante on ao3.
Last active 60 minutes ago
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
Text
there are literally worse things than being in a saw trap like for instance openly expressing that you have wants and needs and are a real person
134K notes
¡
View notes
Text
if u get bored/lonely you can start jerking off which will instantly summon all your friends for a long and intensive socratic dialogue in ur dmsđ
5K notes
¡
View notes
Text
i think every interaction ever should be like giving someone your business card
331 notes
¡
View notes
Text
Thinking about the Holmes story where a blind girl goes to him and is like "My fiancĂŠ is missing and he kept telling me the week leading up to his disappearance that he would always love me and come back for me,were anything to happen so I think he knew he was in trouble and I love him so much and I'm going to wait for him but I'd like to find him faster,ya know?" And Holmes figures out that it was this girl's parents to scam her out of money she was owed from an estate which she gave to them because she was still living at home,which she wouldn't be if she ever married,so her step father PRETENDED TO DATE HER for MONTHS to keep her from ever getting engaged to a real person and when Holmes finds out he confronts this man and this man is like "Well,you caught me! But it wasn't illegal:) so:)" and Holmes is like "No,but it was sickening and cruel and if she had a brother or good male friend he should post you up and whip you but she doesn't." And the man is like "No,she doesn't." And does the Victorian version of sticking his tongue out and Holmes is like "Well,I guess I'll do then!" And HE PULLS OUT HIS HUNTING WHIP.
37K notes
¡
View notes
Text
image how much better if everyone, adults, teens, younger kids, all got recess. like if everyone got 45 minutes to an hour to just play around outside, do fun things, be âchildishâ and things
256K notes
¡
View notes
Text
pinecone pig save me
148 notes
¡
View notes
Text

Pinecone pigs. I can't stop making pinecone pigs
5K notes
¡
View notes
Text
I must not explain the joke. Explaining the joke is the joke-killer. I will face my followers who did not get the joke. I will permit them to pass over me and through me
89K notes
¡
View notes
Text
remember to eat all of the delicious summertime fruits you can before theyre no longer in season. my final message. goodbye
28K notes
¡
View notes
Text
can anyone find me that mesopotamian clay tablet telling you to marry a party girl because she'll bring you joy
86K notes
¡
View notes
Text
There is no autism that makes white people unable to understand racism and when they're being racist. Please. Be serious with yourself and us.
8K notes
¡
View notes
Note
Are you single?
do these look like the posting habits of someone experiencing romance
32K notes
¡
View notes
Text
youre allowed to be uncomfortable and put off by a kink you just shouldn't make it other peoples' fucking problem. block the tag and move on
#get a load of this guy#anyway if anyone wants to pretend to break into my house to assault me hmu âĽ
2K notes
¡
View notes
Text
when you drink all the wine in the house and then you have. :( no wine in the house
83K notes
¡
View notes
Text
So what Iâve learned from the past couple months of being really loud about being a bi woman on Tumblr is: A lot of young/new LGBT+ people on this site do not understand that some of the stuff theyâre saying comes across to other LGBT+ people as offensive, aggressive, or threatening. And when they actually find out the history and context, a lot of them go, âOh my god, Iâm so sorry, I never meant to say that.â
Like, âqueer is a slurâ: I get the impression that people saying this are like⌠oh, how I might react if I heard someone refer to all gay men as âf*gsâ. Like, âOh wow, thatâs a super loaded word with a bunch of negative freight behind it, are you really sure you want to put that word on people who are still very raw and would be alarmed, upset, or offended if they heard you call them it, no matter what you intended?â
So theyâre really surprised when self-described queers respond with a LOT of hostility to what feels like a well-intentioned reminder that some people might not like it.Â
Thatâs because thereâs a history of âpolitical lesbiansâ, like Sheila Jeffreys, who believe that no matter their sexual orientation, women should cut off all social contact with men, who are fundamentally evil, and only date the âcorrectâ sex, which is other women. Political lesbians claim that relationships between women, especially ones that donât contain lust, are fundamentally pure, good, and unproblematic. They therefore regard most of the LGBT community with deep suspicion, because its members are either way too into sex, into the wrong kind of sex, into sex with men, are men themselves, or somehow challenge the very definitions of sex and gender.Â
When âqueer theoryâ arrived in the 1980s and 1990s as an organized attempt by many diverse LGBT+ people in academia to sit down and talk about the social oppressions they face, political lesbians like Jeffreys attacked it harshly, publishing articles like âThe Queer Disappearance of Lesbiansâ, arguing that because queer theory said it was okay to be a man or stop being a man or want to have sex with a man, it was fundamentally evil and destructive. And this attitude has echoed through the years; many LGBT+ people have experience being harshly criticized by radical feminists because being anything but a cis âgold star lesbianâ (another phrase that gives me war flashbacks) was considered patriarchal, oppressive, and basically evil.
And when those arguments happened, âqueerâ was a good umbrella to shelter under, even when people didnât know the intricacies of academic queer theory; people who identified as âqueerâ were more likely to be accepting and understanding, and âqueerâ was often the only label or community bisexual and nonbinary people didnât get chased out of. If someone didnât disagree that people got to call themselves queer, but didnât want to be called queer themselves, they could just say âI donât like being called queerâ and that was that. Being âqueerâ was to being LGBT as being a âfeministâ was to being a woman; it was opt-in.
But this history isnât evident when these interactions happen. We donât sit down and say, âOkay, so forty years ago there was this woman named Sheila, andâŚâ Instead we queers go POP! like pufferfish, instantly on the defensive, a red haze descending over our vision, and bellow, âDO NOT TELL ME WHAT WORDS I CANNOT USE,â because we cannot find a way to say, âThis word is so vital and precious to me, I wouldnât be alive in the same way if I lost it.â And then the people who just pointed out that this word has a history, JEEZ, way to overreact, go away very confused and off-put, because they were just trying to say.
But Iâve found that once this is explained, a lot of people go, âOh wow, okay, I did NOT mean to insinuate that, I didnât realize that I was also saying something with a lot of painful freight to it.â
And that? That gives me hope for the future.
150K notes
¡
View notes