My names Mick. I am an artist. He/She/They all work. Mid-20's. I swear constantly and have a hard time initiating conversations. I'm not gonna do a full background check on everyone that follows me and I try not to get too political but I can't help the fact that I care about the rights and wellbeing of others. I am cautiously optimistic about the future of mankind. I am working on a project called Dogwood. I sometimes post about it, but I'm still tweaking the lore a bit so some of the old stuff is obsolete.
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
Text
ed zitron, a tech beat reporter, wrote an article about a recent paper that came out from goldman-sachs calling AI, in nicer terms, a grift. it is a really interesting article; hearing criticism from people who are not ignorant of the tech and have no reason to mince words is refreshing. it also brings up points and asks the right questions:
if AI is going to be a trillion dollar investment, what trillion dollar problem is it solving?
what does it mean when people say that AI will "get better"? what does that look like and how would it even be achieved? the article makes a point to debunk talking points about how all tech is misunderstood at first by pointing out that the tech it gets compared to the most, the internet and smartphones, were both created over the course of decades with roadmaps and clear goals. AI does not have this.
the american power grid straight up cannot handle the load required to run AI because it has not been meaningfully developed in decades. how are they going to overcome this hurdle (they aren't)?
people who are losing their jobs to this tech aren't being "replaced". they're just getting a taste of how little their managers care about their craft and how little they think of their consumer base. ai is not capable of replacing humans and there's no indication they ever will because...
all of these models use the same training data so now they're all giving the same wrong answers in the same voice. without massive and i mean EXPONENTIALLY MASSIVE troves of data to work with, they are pretty much as a standstill for any innovation they're imagining in their heads
73K notes
·
View notes
Text
our new job launched its mandatory ai transcription program designed to streamline our workflow and not only does it melt down the moment it has to transcribe non-white customers but it keeps hallucinating the existence of a mysterious boy named dorian who shows up in every third call summary
33K notes
·
View notes
Text
"came back wrong" but it's food that you heated up in the microwave
108K notes
·
View notes
Text
generally I think people on here just wildly overestimate fandom's general pull on the world. I see so many posts that claim fandom has ruined society's general ability to understand media and guys, this is a niche hobby. the vast majority of people, even the majority of online youth, have never read a fanfiction. you only think fanfiction is that influential if you're constantly on The Fandom Website.
37K notes
·
View notes
Text
everyone on this website except me needs to shut up
155K notes
·
View notes
Text
wghatever the fuck this genre of tweet is i cant fucking stop saying mein scheiss Hund as a vocal stim
79K notes
·
View notes
Text
had a fucking hilarious dream that tumblr replaced the "block" function with the far funnier "glock" function, which did the exact same thing except whenever anyone blocked you a random bullet hole, like a png of a bullet hole, would appear on your blog. discourse blogs were unreadable bc you'd go to the page and the sheer amount of bullet hole pngs stacked over the blogs obscured everything. I woke myself up laughing
201K notes
·
View notes
Text

stealing this post from a radfem. let’s sulk with mama
441 notes
·
View notes
Audio
84K notes
·
View notes