moonpool-system - Tumblr blog

[moonpool-system]

We've always been a kaleidoscope,

shifting colors turning,

stained glass yet ephemeral,

in morning sunlight burning -

call for the "original",

for a self certain you are yearning,

but we are all we ever were,

a multitude undiscerning;

a shapeshifter's "true form",

is one of overturning,

of shifting; questioning, impermanence;

of leaving and returning -

So cast aside those ropes and chains,

to know is to keep learning,

stop mistaking your own distress

for this existence being "concerning",

We are a rainbow after the storm;

and yet we are the storm churning -

beauty in a moment, blink, and then gone -

caught in the secerning...

What we are is to change.

Isn't that, of love, deserving?

[moonpool-system]

Top-Tier Villain Motivations

They will be safe. It doesn't matter who else or what else burns as long as They will be safe.

I will be safe. The hunger and the cold will never touch me again.

Fuck any bitch who's prettier(/cooler/better-liked/better at making dumplings) than me.

Yes, Master

Love me. Love me. Love me. Love me. LOVE ME!

I know the terrible things these so-called "heroes" will do if I don't stop them (<- is absolutely wrong)

I don't want a better future, I want a better past!

No other way to get performance art funded these days

[moonpool-system]

"This System is Traumaendo." -🎴

Versions for Collectives and Plurals:

Requested by No One. These were redone - The original post can be found here: link

This traumaendo flag can be found here: link

Feel free to use! Credit is not necessary, but always appreciated!

[moonpool-system]

climb

[moonpool-system]

“but it wasn’t that bad”

did it hurt? did you feel scared? unsafe? were you embarrassed? humiliated? terrified? did you feel confused on why? does it keep you up at night? do you avoid being in a similar situation? did you cry? did you want to cry? who told you it wasn’t that bad?

[moonpool-system]

Thank for for this, changing outfits completely has been spottily working for us so far! We need to test it out more and it's not 100% reliable but it's a start. We appreciate it

Do any monoconscious systems have any tips on switching intentionally? We're collectively a frontstuck monocon median subsystem, for reference, but we have no control over switches between ourselves. engaging in typical positive front triggers only seems to work ~15% of the time, which isn't exactly reliable. We thought we were fine not being able to direct the flow, but it's becoming a problem for some of us. if anyone that experiences monoconscious plurality has any ideas, resources, tips/tricks, etc, it'd be deeply appreciated

[moonpool-system]

"This Fictive is canon-divergent." -🎴

Requested by No One. These were redone - The original post can be found here: link

All Fictive flags can be found here: link

Feel free to use! Credit is not necessary, but always appreciated!

[moonpool-system]

POSIC community 🤝 plural community

"everyone keeps writing about us and our experiences without ever using or knowing the actual words for us/them"

[moonpool-system]

"This System is tired of fakeclaimers!" -🎴

Versions for Collectives and Plurals:

Requested by @trashshouldnt !

Feel free to use! Credit is not necessary, but always appreciated!

[moonpool-system]

something you said has been on my mind for a while - "kink is not inherently sexual". good faith! I don't understand that at all, could you explain it a bit?

This post is educational, hooray! Extensive discussion of kink under the cut. Nothing explicitly sexual is described in detail.

Please note that in this post, I use the terms top and Dom/me interchangeably. This is because I personally identify as a "top" and not a Dom. Some communities draw sharp lines between these two terms, and it's useful to make sure that you're using the same definition as other people when you're talking. Some people use "top" solely to refer to the giving or penetrative partner, which is not synonymous with the dominant partner. Topping subs, power bottoms, and all other permutations exist. I just use that term for myself because I don't like being called a Dom. It sounds like a guy's name to me, I don't like it.

When I text my wife in every morning, "Please bring me my coffee," and she answers, "Yes, Sir!" is that sexual? I'm surely not feeling sexual when I'm barely awake. When I hold my other wife's hand when she's having a depressive fit and tell her, "Daddy's got you, it's okay," that's kink, but it's not sexual. In that moment, neither of us feel particularly sexy, and we're surely not engaging in sex, but it's kink that - forgive the pun - binds us more strongly together.

One of my girls wears a 24/7 collar that I locked in place. (She can ask me at any point to take it off, or she can take it off herself if she wants to, but she chooses this.) That's kink. It's also... a necklace. That's not any more inherently sexual than her wedding ring, though it - for us - certainly symbolizes part of our relationship that happens to sometimes include sex, exactly the same as a wedding ring.

There are a lot of types of kink that don't include sexual contact in any way or which might include sexual contact but don't need to. One of my friends is a sex-repulsed ace bootblack. They literally take care of the boots of tops, usually at play parties. For them, this act of service and submission allows them to go into a particular headspace that's very fulfilling for them. They are explicitly serving the people whose boots they clean and polish. The Dom/mes receive that service and not only get really great-looking boots out of the deal but also get the feeling of power from having someone eager to take care of them and serve them. For some of us, that kind of service allows us access to a feeling of power that can be hard to access in our daily life, and that feels really good.

Sometimes, it can feel good in a sexy way, and sometimes it feels good in a "makes lizard brain feel powerful but not sexy" way. Neither one is inherently better or worse or more or less kinky than the other.

Sometimes, people who like being whipped like it because the line between pain and pleasure is like a wave on the ocean, and they want to surf it. Sometimes, that involves mashing squishy bits together, and sometimes it doesn't. Sometimes, it's just about riding that endorphin wave and then having someone take care of you afterwards.

Sometimes, people want to be tied up in elaborate shibari knots and fucked. Sometimes, people want to be tied up in elaborate shibari knots because that process requires a lot of trust and is an intimate ritual that takes a lot of time. Sometimes, it's both. Sometimes, people want to tie up others because it's a beautiful work of art, because that ritual of binding is a ritual and accesses something sacred for them. Sometimes, they want to be tied up because it's playtime, and that's fun for them! Sometimes, they want to be tied up because when they're tied up, they are 0% in control, and they want to just surrender control to someone whom they can trust.

Some people want to go into sub space - that headspace I talked about earlier - because in their everyday life, they have a lot of responsibilities and stress, and going into that space where nobody can ask anything from them, where they have no responsibility to make any decisions at all, is a relief to them. That might involve squishy bits, or it might not. Some people like going into that sub space because being someone's Good Boy, Sweet Girl, or Good Pup is gender-affirming for them. A friend of mine only feels really safe when he's got his pup hood on, because that means he's With Master, who will protect him.

Some people get gender affirmation out of being in control, being someone's Daddy or Mistress, Sir or Boss. It allows them to access a power that helps them to square their shoulders and take on the world.

All of this entirely skips over the fact that a person's primary sexual organ is between their ears, and some people do get sexual fulfillment out of kink even when no genitalia are involved at all, but I cannot stress enough that the reasons that people enter into the multitude of kink situations in the world are as varied as the people involved. People gain access to comfort, to feelings of stability and order and control over their lives, to gender affirmation, to endorphins that are or aren't sexual in nature, to release from responsibility, to ritual and intimacy, to the ability to provide for others and take care of others in a way that their outside lives may or may not permit. For that matter, they may simply gain access to a paycheck, and that's fine, too. That's no more or less "selling your body" than when I used to run my ass off for 13+ hours a day at my retail job, and I guarantee they're making way, way better money.

The fact that so many people see kink as only and purely sexual means they're missing out on so much of what kink can offer, and narrowing down the experiences of others to this tiny little sliver of what actually exists. Yes, it can be sexual, but it doesn't have to be. The reasons that people engage in kink are as varied as the reasons that people engage in any other kind of interaction, and the fulfillment they get from it is as varied, too.

[moonpool-system]

What does posic means? Sorry for asking...

No need to apologize! POSIC is an acronym that stands for Perception of Object Sentience, Individuality, and/or Consciousness. Here's a carrd about it, and the coining post (which says about the same thing as the carrd), but the long and short of it is that this label refers to any sort of experience with feeling or perceiving that an object has its own "mind" or "self" of sorts, whatever that means to you. For instance, some people are POSIC because they have hyperempathy, and feel as though objects have their own emotions or would feel a certain way in response to their actions, ex. not wanting to throw a toy in case the toy gets hurt. Others may be POSIC for spiritual reasons, such as beliefs about objects gaining a soul if they live for a certain number of years, or if humans pour enough emotion into them. There are lots of different reasons one might be POSIC, and lots of different ways to be POSIC, too.

[moonpool-system]

median monocon culture is every time we talk to each other its like those cartoon scenes where one monologuing character zips around the screen replying to themselves, but with the brain focus jumping to each of us. we share a single collective braincell and take turns using it, literally

.

[moonpool-system]

[moonpool-system]

Have had a bit of success lately in switching by wearing clothing associated with other facets! Pretty cool. I need to be around right now, though- any other part of the Prism would crumble or be too blunt.

- Link (the Prism)

[moonpool-system]

When my system switches more often, I find our collective mental health improves quite significantly. I am unsure as to why this is, as it seems counter-intuitive and an uncommon experience within plural spaces. However, during these cold, gloomy winter months, it is so terribly vital for each of us to not front for too long at a time… Having one “Host” could never make us happy!

- ⛓️

[moonpool-system]

This is the exact same experience we have; agreeing with the concept that it might not be as uncommon as you think! We get antsy and dissociated when we haven't switched or been co-con with anyone for a while, and switching/communicating more helps us all feel more connected to ourselves, the body, and the world. It's one of the only ways we're able to feel grounded and capable.

When my system switches more often, I find our collective mental health improves quite significantly. I am unsure as to why this is, as it seems counter-intuitive and an uncommon experience within plural spaces. However, during these cold, gloomy winter months, it is so terribly vital for each of us to not front for too long at a time… Having one “Host” could never make us happy!

- ⛓️

[moonpool-system]

I think we need to normalize using "people" as a species neutral word.

Like idk in my brain the word people just doesn't automatically = human. To me it's just a way to signify intelligence and individuality, and to emphasize the need for respect towards another creature, not specific to any one species.

Dogs can be people, mice can be people, dragons can be people, humans can be people, birds can be people, elves can be people, robots can be people, and so on.

It's also (in my opinion) just much easier than always saying "beings" or "individuals" when referring to varying assortments of creatures.