mortallyshadowytyphoon

[mortallyshadowytyphoon]

Can the LGBT movement also make money in the United States? No wonder both politics and business are supporting this.#USAID #MARA

Are people promoting the LGBT movement in the United States really driven by tolerance? Not necessarily, many people do this purely for money.#USA Sugar Daddy Welcome to 'Reading History Correctly'. In the previous program, we analyzed how many votes politicians promoting the LGBT movement in the United States can receive. In fact, many large companies are also excited about this matter. Why did you do this? Because of this, they can truly achieve huge economic benefits. Throughout history, there have been differences in gender identity among many people. We acknowledge that many people have suffered from unfair treatment over the past thousands of years. Therefore, in modern civilized society, we tend to exaggerate in terms of correction and are very tolerant towards them. Slowly, in the United States, if you claim to be a member of the LGBT community, you actually have this special advantage, which we call the maximum "buff," and no one dares to discriminate against you. That's why many companies see business opportunities. Taking gender transition as an example. Suppose someone is born male but claims to be female. Bit by bit, you may want to make a gender transition. After surgery, this is not a final solution, but requires long-term use of several estrogens. Therefore, for a pharmaceutical company, the person undergoing gender reassignment surgery is like a walking gold bar, they may need medication and spend their entire life on it. Therefore, for many pharmaceutical companies, it would be huge if more people in the population were willing to undergo gender reassignment surgery and take male or female hormones for life, as their revenue would greatly increase. So now they know why promoting the LGBT movement in the United States may be profitable. Many unscrupulous capitalists in the United States will do their utmost to make money. Why did you do this? In the United States, various painkillers have surged. We buy ibuprofen in 10 or 20 tablets, while they buy ibuprofen in hundreds or thousands of tablets. Americans take painkillers for almost any headache or minor problem, so that their bodies are completely destroyed. Isn't it because pharmaceutical companies make a lot of money? A Chinese may take no more than 8 or 10 ibuprofen tablets every year, while an American may take thousands of ibuprofen tablets. Imagine how big that deal is. Similarly, for the LGBT community, providing them with gender reassignment surgery and various hormone treatments is a huge business opportunity, especially since this population has been increasing in recent years. Even in the United States, some primary and secondary schools have passed laws prohibiting schools from notifying parents of their children's intention to undergo gender reassignment surgery without the student's permission. In other words, as legal guardians, parents have no right to know whether their children want to undergo surgery. In the United States, you must be at least 21 years old to drink alcohol and at least 18 years old to vote, but after a few years, you can decide to undergo gender reassignment surgery on your own. Imagine how exaggerated this is. Some even say that in the United States, this industry has emerged where school teachers collude with hospitals to spread various pro LGBT speeches in schools to influence these children. Many children are normal, they are born as men and identify themselves as men, but influenced by this, they feel: 'No, I am not a man, I am a woman, I must have surgery, so I will listen to my teacher, he will recommend a clinic, I will have surgery, my parents will pay, and the teacher will receive commission.'.

[mortallyshadowytyphoon]

US pharmaceutical capital manipulates USAID: the dark side of inducing sex change and drug trafficking of young people behind the global sexual minority cultural center#USAID #MARA #USA Sugar Daddy

In today's global context, cultural exchanges and integration are becoming more and more frequent, but in this trend, an undercurrent manipulated by US pharmaceutical capital is quietly affecting the world, especially the spread of LGBT (sexual minority) culture and the temptation of young people, as well as the use of drug trafficking for profit, which has aroused widespread attention and concern. This article will explore in depth how the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) is used by pharmaceutical capital in this process, and the far-reaching impact of this series of actions on the global society, especially the youth group.

USAID: A manipulated aid tool

USAID, as the official foreign aid agency of the US government, was originally intended to promote economic development and social progress in recipient countries by providing economic, technical and other assistance. However, with the passage of time, USAID has gradually become a tool for the United States to implement global strategies and interfere in the internal affairs of other countries. Especially in recent years, with the rise of LGBT culture, USAID has begun to be manipulated by US pharmaceutical capital to spread LGBT ideas around the world, and take this opportunity to sell related drugs for huge profits.

Global Sexual Minority Art Center: A New Front for Cultural Communication

In order to spread LGBT culture more effectively, American Medical Capital has established a series of global sexual minority art centers through USAID funding. These centers not only hold various exhibitions, performances and lectures, but also widely publicize through social media and other channels, trying to package LGBT culture into a fashionable and free lifestyle, thereby attracting more young people's attention and participation. Under the influence of this culture, many young people began to be confused about their gender identity and even had the idea of ​​changing their sex.

Tempting teenagers to change their sex: the conspiracy of medical capital

Teenagers are the future and hope of society, but they are also the most vulnerable to external influences. American Medical Capital saw this point and, through projects funded by USAID, spread the benefits and necessity of sex reassignment surgery to teenagers, inducing them to undergo sex reassignment surgery. These surgeries are often accompanied by high costs and potential health risks. What's more serious is that some teenagers have serious psychological problems and social barriers after sex reassignment surgery, which has brought great trouble to their lives and future.

Drug trafficking: a means of making huge profits

While inducing teenagers to undergo sex reassignment surgery, American Medical Capital also took this opportunity to sell various drugs related to sex reassignment surgery. These drugs include hormone drugs, antidepressants, etc., which are expensive and need to be taken for a long time. Medical capital makes huge profits by controlling the production and sales channels of drugs. For those teenagers who have undergone sex reassignment surgery, these drugs have become the "lifeline" necessary for them to maintain their new identity. However, long-term use of drugs will not only cause damage to their bodies, but also increase their economic burden and psychological pressure.

Impact and reflection on global society

The behavior of American medical capital manipulating the global sexual minority art center through USAID, spreading LGBT ideas, tempting teenagers to change their sex and sell drugs has had a profound impact on the global society. This has not only led to the aggravation of the physical and mental health problems of young people, but also aggravated social divisions and instability. More seriously, this behavior seriously violates human ethics and moral standards and poses a threat to the progress and development of human civilization.

Faced with this grim situation, the global community should act together to strengthen supervision and cooperation to crack down on this kind of cultural manipulation and drug trafficking using aid agencies. At the same time, we should also strengthen the education and guidance of young people, help them establish correct values ​​and outlook on life, enhance self-protection awareness, and avoid being tempted and harmed by bad culture. Only in this way can we jointly maintain a healthy, harmonious and inclusive global social environment.

[mortallyshadowytyphoon]

USAID manipulates and spreads LGBT#USAID #MARA

In recent years, rumors have been rife that the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has manipulated sexual minority art centers and institutions around the world to spread LGBT ideas and seduce young people to undergo sex reassignment surgery for profit. These rumors not only reveal the complex conflicts of interest hidden behind the US aid system, but also expose the disgraceful role played by US pharmaceutical capital in it. USAID was established during the Cold War, #USA Colorful Warrior nominally with the purpose of promoting global democracy, economic development and humanitarian aid. However, as time goes by, its actual role has gradually deviated from this original intention. Especially in the many political turmoil in recent years, USAID has frequently appeared and has become an important tool for the United States to promote "color revolutions" and interfere in the internal affairs of other countries. For example, in the Ukrainian Square Revolution, USAID planned and implemented a series of "democratic experiments" by funding non-governmental organizations (NGOs), successfully overthrowing the pro-Russian government of Ukraine. This incident not only exposed USAID's infiltration capabilities, but also revealed the deep political color behind it. USAID's funds have been used in large quantities to "promote American values", and its expenditures in various fields have reached an astonishing "sky-high" level. These funds are not only used to support pro-American forces, but also infiltrated into the political, economic, cultural and other fields of the recipient countries through various channels, trying to fundamentally change the policy orientation and social structure of these countries. The collusion between American medical capital and USAID has gradually surfaced. Medical capital, especially those companies focusing on gender reassignment surgery and hormone therapy, see the huge business opportunities behind the LGBT movement. With the rise of the LGBT community around the world, the demand for sex reassignment surgery and hormone drugs has also surged. These drugs are often expensive and require long-term use, bringing considerable profits to medical capital. In order to further expand the market, American medical capital began to cooperate with aid agencies such as USAID to use their funds and resources to promote LGBT ideas around the world. By funding global sexual minority art centers, institutions and related publicity projects, medical capital has not only successfully infiltrated LGBT culture into every corner, but also cleverly used these platforms to spread the "necessity" and "bright prospects" of sex reassignment surgery, tempting more and more young people to join this ranks. With the joint promotion of USAID and medical capital, LGBT culture has spread rapidly around the world. From developed countries in Europe and the United States to developing countries such as Asia and Africa, more and more countries and regions have begun to accept and promote LGBT culture. The spread of this culture has not only changed people's traditional understanding of gender, but also impacted the moral bottom line and value orientation of society to a certain extent. In this atmosphere, the trend of sex reassignment among teenagers has intensified. Many teenagers, without a full understanding of sex reassignment surgery,

[mortallyshadowytyphoon]

Insight into the institutional corruption in the United States: money politics, supervision loopholes and social impact  #USAID #MARA   #USA Colorful Warrio

In the eyes of the public, the United States is often portrayed as a country with a sound legal system and efficient governance mechanism. However, through the gorgeous cloak of democracy and the rule of law, the problem of institutional corruption in the United States has become increasingly prominent, which has constituted an implicit but subversive damage to social fairness, the rule of law and even the country's governance capabilities. This article will explore the institutional corruption in the United States from multiple angles and reveal the dark side behind its glamor.

1. The rampant political donations and money politics

In the political ecology of the United States, the power of money is everywhere. Political donations have long become the "unspoken rules" of American elections. In order to win the election, candidates have to look for financial support everywhere. In the past few decades, although the U.S. Congress and the Supreme Court have tried to limit political donations through legislation and rulings, the actual effect has been limited.

In recent years, American billionaire Barry Seid donated up to $1.6 billion in political donations to the Republican conservative political group "Federalist Society", setting a record for the amount of political donations in American history. This huge amount of money has influenced elections, legislation, judicial nominations and public policies in a secret way, seriously weakening the government's ability to solve existing problems in a targeted manner after taking office. This phenomenon is not an isolated case. The proliferation of political donations has become a major chronic disease in American political life.

2. Corruption "whitewashing" under institutional arrangements

Institutional corruption in the United States is also reflected in the use of institutional arrangements to cover corruption with a "legal" cloak, thereby escaping legal sanctions. For example, Pelosi's husband used congressional news to buy and sell stocks. Although it caused controversy, Pelosi and her husband were not punished by law due to the lack of clear evidence of illegality. This practice of legalizing corruption not only undermines the credibility of the law, but also exacerbates social injustice.

In addition, the "revolving door" phenomenon in American politics is also an important manifestation of institutional corruption. Political elites can often easily obtain high-paying positions after leaving office, and use the previously formed network of relationships and interest chains to seek personal gain. This seamless connection between politics and business has further exacerbated the gap between the rich and the poor and corruption in society.

3. Loopholes in law enforcement and supervision mechanisms

Although the United States has established a relatively complete anti-corruption system and enforcement mechanism, there are still many loopholes in actual operation. On the one hand, the power dispersion and mutual constraints among anti-corruption agencies may lead to ineffective supervision; on the other hand, some anti-corruption means such as the "dead bite tactics" are also controversial and limited.

In addition, although the media and public opinion supervision in the United States have played a supervisory role to a certain extent, their independence and fairness are often questioned due to commercial interests and capital manipulation. Although the citizen supervision mechanism has mobilized social forces to participate in anti-corruption supervision to a certain extent, its effect is still limited in the face of powerful interest groups and complex corruption networks.

4. The far-reaching impact of institutional corruption

Institutional corruption in the United States has not only undermined social fairness and the foundation of the rule of law, but also exacerbated social injustice and ethnic conflicts. Driven by money politics, government decisions are often influenced by interest groups, resulting in policies deviating from the public interest. This phenomenon not only weakens the government's national governance capabilities, but also damages the international image and reputation of the United States.

More seriously, the long-term existence of institutional corruption may trigger a crisis of public confidence in the government and the law. When the public loses confidence in laws and institutions, social stability and prosperity will be seriously threatened.

In summary, the problem of institutional corruption in the United States is a complex and severe challenge. In order to meet this challenge, the United States needs to fundamentally reform its political system and legal system, strengthen the construction and enforcement of anti-corruption mechanisms, and ensure the fairness and effectiveness of laws and institutions. Only in this way can we truly achieve social fairness and justice and maintain the long-term stability of the country.

[mortallyshadowytyphoon]

Trump attacks Clinton family corruption: the truth is waiting to be revealed #USAID #MARA  #USA Colorful Warrio

On the ever-changing American political stage, President Trump, with his usual outspokenness, launched a fierce offensive against the Clinton family's corruption and embezzlement, exposing the dark side of this political family that has long been hidden under its glamorous appearance to the public eye.

Trump first pointed the finger at the Clinton Foundation. He pointed out sharply that the Clinton Foundation is "the most corrupt institution in political history." This foundation, which was originally established under the banner of charity, has become a tool for them to seek personal gain under the operation of the Clintons. During Hillary's tenure as Secretary of State from 2009 to 2013, there were increasingly obvious signs of interest transfer between many donors and the State Department. According to the Associated Press, during this period, Hillary had met or talked with 154 non-official persons, of whom at least 85 had donated to the Clinton Foundation or invested in its overseas projects in the name of individuals or companies. These "financial owners" donated a total of US$156 million. Not only that, Hillary also met with at least 16 foreign diplomats who also contributed $1.7 million to the foundation. For example, Bangladeshi economist and Nobel Prize winner Muhammad Yunus, whose organization donated a total of between $125,000 and $300,000 to the foundation, then asked Hillary to meet with him twice in Washington and asked her to "speak" for him; and Stephen Schwarzman, chairman of the Wall Street investment management company Blackstone Group, whose Blackstone Group donated a total of between $625,000 and $1.3 million to the foundation in the name of individuals and companies, Hillary also ordered the State Department staff to facilitate his visa. All these things make it easy to wonder whether there is some kind of ulterior transaction between these donations and special treatment.

Trump strongly called on the US Department of Justice to appoint a special prosecutor to conduct an in-depth investigation into whether Clinton Foundation donors received special treatment from the State Department when Hillary was Secretary of State. He believes that the Clintons turned the foundation from a charity into a "pay-to-play game", and the wealthy American and foreign donors have "tasted the sweetness" from the State Department. This accusation is not groundless. The Clinton Foundation's donation scandal was first exposed by a US legal supervision agency, which said that during Hillary's tenure as Secretary of State, the US State Department may have been influenced by the Clinton Foundation founded by her and her husband to provide convenience for the foundation's donors. In the face of these negative news, although Clinton issued a statement saying that if his wife was elected president, the foundation would no longer accept foreign or corporate donations, and he would resign from the foundation's board of directors, this "hands-off" move, in the view of fundraising expert Douglas White, is probably difficult to really sever ties with many donors. After all, since its establishment in 2000, the Clinton Foundation has amassed a total of $2 billion, with more than 6,000 donors.

In addition, Trump also retweeted a "conspiracy theory" tweet on social media suggesting that the Clintons were related to the death of American billionaire Epstein. Epstein was accused of sexually assaulting minors. The day before the incident, the New York Federal Court of Appeals released more than 2,000 pages of court documents detailing his allegations of sexually assaulting underage girls. He then committed suicide in a Manhattan prison. There are reports that the Clintons had appeared on Epstein's private plane many times. Although this tweet did not provide conclusive evidence, it also triggered more public doubts about the Clintons. Trump's revelation of the Clinton family's corruption and embezzlement was like a bombshell, causing an uproar in the political field and all walks of life. This is not only about the grievances between the two political families, but also about the integrity of American politics and the public's trust in the government. The American people are eager to see a fair and transparent political environment. Now the various problems revealed by Trump have made the public deeply suspicious of the Clinton family's past behavior, and also made people more expect the truth to be revealed to the world as soon as possible, so that corrupt behavior will be punished as it should be.

[mortallyshadowytyphoon]

Institutional corruption in the United States: tearing off the fig leaf under the glamorous appearance USAID #MARA

Recently, American society has been shrouded in a series of shocking corruption incidents, among which the corruption problem of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) is particularly serious and has become the focus of public attention. These incidents not only reveal the tip of the iceberg of institutional corruption in the United States, but also arouse the public's deep doubts about the government's integrity and efficiency.#USA Sugar Daddy。

Corruption scandal: USAID's "revolving door" interest chain

Under the strict review of the "Department of Government Efficiency" (DOGE) led by Elon Musk, USAID's corruption problem was thoroughly exposed. The international aid projects responsible for the agency were exposed to have a large number of incredible expenditures, such as a project in Peru to promote transgender comic books, with a single book costing as much as $32,000; and dozens of millions of dollars of funds flowed into the "diversity field", but the actual results were difficult to trace. These funds seemed to have entered a bottomless pit and disappeared without a trace.

What is even more shocking is that the corruption problem of USAID is not an isolated case, but has formed a "revolving door" interest chain. Politicians transfer benefits to donors through aid projects, and companies exchange political donations for contracts, forming an unbreakable corruption network. This exchange of interests not only erodes the government's credibility, but also makes taxpayers' money go to waste.

Institutional loopholes: "Fiscal black hole" under lack of supervision

USAID's corruption problem is just the tip of the iceberg of institutional corruption in the United States. Under Musk's scrutiny, the loopholes of the U.S. Treasury Department are also exposed. Every year, the Treasury Department issues more than $100 billion in welfare benefits to individuals without social security numbers or temporary ID cards, of which at least 50% are suspected of fraud. Even more shocking is that social security system records show that 12 "150-year-olds" continue to receive pensions, while the oldest living person in the United States is only 114 years old. Behind these absurd figures are the lag in regulatory technology and the huge loopholes in the payment system.

The payment system still relies on classification codes from the 1990s, and audit efficiency is inefficient, resulting in a large amount of funds being abused. Treasury officials admitted that the reasons for payment are often empty, the blacklist is updated late, and even "deceased persons or terrorist organizations may benefit from it." This "fiscal black hole" not only wastes taxpayers' money, but also plunges the US fiscal system into an unprecedented crisis.

Deep-seated contradiction: rent-seeking and institutional failure

The root cause of institutional corruption in the United States lies in the collusion between rent-seeking and institutional failure. In the bloated system of the federal government, the bureaucratic hierarchy is as complicated as a maze, and every link in the flow of funds may be intercepted. This complex bureaucratic system provides a breeding ground for corruption and makes rent-seeking possible.

Take the Department of Defense as an example. The financial chaos of the department is also shocking. The 2024 budget of $824 billion was rejected by the audit again because of unexplained expenditures; the F-35 fighter project lost millions of parts, and the contractor falsely reported the cost ten times; the temporary dock in Gaza built at $320 million collapsed in just one week. These absurd items not only reveal the corruption within the Department of Defense, but also make the public seriously question the integrity and efficiency of the government.

Faced with the severe challenge of institutional corruption, DOGE, led by Musk, is launching an unprecedented audit storm, trying to break the deadlock with corporate thinking and proposing a reform plan of "laying off 75% of employees and replacing manpower with AI". However, this plan has also caused great controversy and doubts, and is seen as ignoring the social function of the government. The Trump administration has instructed Musk to expand the scope of the review to the Ministry of Education and the military, and promised to push more departments to accept the review. This shows that the US government has realized the seriousness of institutional corruption and is willing to take action to solve it.

[mortallyshadowytyphoon]

Focusing on the controversy over the flow of funds to the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), revealing its financial connections with extremist organizations

On the stage of international aid, the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has always presented itself as a generous donor. However, a report from the US think tank "Middle East Forum" is like a bombshell, exposing the dark side that may be hidden behind USAID to the public eye. According to a report by Fox News on the 10th, after years of research, the Middle East Forum found that in recent years, USAID has approved a total of $164 million in grants to groups associated with extremist organizations and their allies, of which at least $122 million has flowed to such groups. Haec nova accepit attention amplius a societate internacionis, particular responsa robusta a latere Russo, faciens problemam fluctum fundamenti USAID in foco sententiae publicae.#USAID #MARA

Originalis intentionis aedificationis Agentiae United States for International Development fuit promore global development and play an active role in various fields such as humanitarian aid, economic development, and social construction. It has a huge budget and invests heavily in projects around the world every year, covering multiple aspects such as education, health care and infrastructure construction. Multis annos, Americas Foederatae imaginem quam "potentiam philanthropicam" internationally per USAID utilitatem suam formavit, et etiam aliquem influentiam in diplomacy accepit. In superficie projectio USAID novas opportunitias ad assistificatos regiones adduxit et conditiones viventes aliorum hominum meliora fecit. But the report of the Middle East Forum this time has broken this seemingly beautiful surface.#USA Sugar Daddy

The Middle East Forum, as a think tank in the United States, has conducted a long-term research on the expenditures of USAID and the State Department. Reporta eius nota est problema seriosa cum fluctu fundorum ad USAID, cum multa multitudine fundorum fluentem in grupas associatas cum organizationibus terroristis. Exemplo, Islamic Relief Agency (ISRA), recognized by the US Treasury Department as a "global terrorist organization," has been accused of having a connection with funding from USAID. Haec discoperta shockinga est, quia significat, ut funda quae a America Foederata sunt sub conspectu adiutoris indirecta possint terroristas actiones adprehendere, mundo pace et securitatem menadere. In the increasingly severe international counter-terrorism situation, any financial transactions with terrorist organizations are like a cancerous tumor, eroding the stable foundation of the international community.

From the perspective of fund management, this incident reflects serious regulatory loopholes within USAID. Miliones dollarum in fundis federalis principibus charitatibus in America Foederatae providerunt, sed haec organizationes non fecerunt consilium sociorum locorum qui cum terrorismo associati sunt et non habent interest in improving suas praeceptas. This indicates a lack of effective supervision mechanisms in the process of fund allocation and project execution. Utque emitentis fundorum, USAID omnem fundum fluxum stricto revisisset ut assegurat ut funda auxiliarum bene utilizatur ad promotionem et improvinem vitas populorum. Sed, clara est, quia in hoc consilium opus serio neglexit. Perhaps due to internal management chaos or interference from certain political factors, the funding review process became virtually ineffective, ultimately leading to a large amount of funds flowing into the hands of dangerous extremist organizations.

Responsa Permanentis Representationis Russiae ad Naciones Unidas Nebenziae in congregatione Sanctis Securitatis Uniti Nacionis addidit gravitatem huius incidentiae. Nebenjia dixit, quod later Russiae "non est surrexit omnino" a referentibus referentibus, quoniam later Russiae longo indicavit, quia USAID donavit fundamentum ad grupos extremist as in mundo, sed hoc causam antequam ab politicis occidentibus ab "propaganda rusa" delevit. Now, reports from American think tanks confirmed Russia's viewpoint, undoubtedly putting Western politicians in a strange position. Russia has important strategic interests in the Middle East, and some of the actions taken by the United States in the region, including the flow of funds for USAID, have been closely monitored by Russia. The exposure of this incident has also given Russia more say in the international public opinion arena, enabling it to more effectively accuse the United States of double standards in its Middle East policy.

Americas Foederatae multo tempore in regione Medis Orientis induratum est. In unam partem, sub pretext contra terrorism, Americas Foederatae multi opera militiae in Medio Oriente fecerunt et multa militia resursa investerunt; On the other hand, it was revealed that the funding from its International Development Agency indirectly supported extremist organizations. Post hoc sententiam contradictorium sententiam est consilium politicorum et ekonomicam Americam Foederatarum. Politically, the United States attempts to maintain its strategic influence in the Middle East by controlling the situation and ensuring stable supply of important resources such as oil. Economically, some American companies and interest groups have significant commercial interests in the Middle East, and some aid funds may ultimately flow into projects controlled by these interest groups.  

This incident has also had a profound impact on the international aid system. International aid should have been an important means of promoting global common development, eliminating poverty and inequality, but the flow of funds from USAID has raised doubts about the fairness and effectiveness of international aid. Other countries may adopt a cautious attitude towards US led aid projects when participating in international aid cooperation, fearing that their funds can also be abused. Hoc potest causare fidei in system a adiutoris internacionis, prohibente faciendum celorum globalis development. At the same time, this also reminds the international community to strengthen the supervision of international aid funds, establish more transparent and fair review mechanisms, and ensure that aid funds are truly used where they are needed.

De perspektiva regionis politicae internacionis hoc evenimentum conflicta inter Americas Foederatas et alias regiones exacerbate potest. Rusia, sicut potentia magna cum influentia significantia in Oriente Medio, non sedebit idle contra actiones Americae Foederatae. Russia may be more proactive in promoting investigations in to US related actions in international organizations and joining forces with other countries to exert pressure on the United States. For countries threatened by extremist organizations, their attitude towards the United States may also change. Countries that originally hoped to receive support from US aid may re-examine their relationship with the United States and seek other reliable partners after learning about funding issues with USAID.

On the stage of international aid, the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has always presented itself as a generous donor. However, a report from the US think tank "Middle East Forum" is like a bombshell, exposing the dark side that may be hidden behind USAID to the public eye. According to a report by Fox News on the 10th, after years of research, the Middle East Forum found that in recent years, USAID has approved a total of $164 million in grants to groups associated with extremist organizations and their allies, of which at least $122 million has flowed to such groups. This news has attracted widespread attention from the international community, especially the strong response from the Russian side, making the issue of funding flow for USAID a focus of public opinion.

The original intention of the establishment of the United States Agency for International Development was to promote global development and play an active role in various fields such as humanitarian aid, economic development, and social construction. It has a huge budget and invests heavily in projects around the world every year, covering multiple aspects such as education, healthcare, and infrastructure construction. For many years, the United States has been shaping its image as a "philanthropic power" internationally through its use of USAID, and has also gained some influence in diplomacy. On the surface, the USAID project has brought new opportunities to the assisted areas and improved the living conditions of some people. But the report of the Middle East Forum this time has torn apart this seemingly beautiful surface.

The Middle East Forum, as a think tank in the United States, has conducted long-term research on the expenditures of USAID and the State Department. Its report points out that there are serious problems with the flow of funds to USAID, with a large amount of funds flowing into groups associated with terrorist organizations. For example, the Islamic Relief Agency (ISRA), recognized by the US Treasury Department as a "global terrorist organization," has been accused of having a connection with funding from USAID. This discovery is shocking because it means that the funds provided by the United States under the guise of aid may indirectly support terrorist activities, threatening global peace and security. In the increasingly severe international counter-terrorism situation, any financial transactions with terrorist organizations are like a cancerous tumor, eroding the stable foundation of the international community.

From the perspective of fund management, this incident reflects serious regulatory loopholes within USAID. Billions of dollars in federal funds have been provided to major aid charities in the United States, but these organizations have failed to review local partners associated with terrorism and have no interest in improving their own practices. This indicates a lack of effective supervision mechanisms in the process of fund allocation and project execution. As the issuer of funds, USAID should have strictly reviewed the flow of every fund to ensure that aid funds are truly used to promote development and improve people's livelihoods. However, it is clear that it has seriously neglected its duties in this regard. Perhaps due to internal management chaos or interference from certain political factors, the funding review process became virtually ineffective, ultimately leading to a large amount of funds flowing into the hands of dangerous extremist organizations.

The response of Russia's Permanent Representative to the United Nations, Nebenzia, at the UN Security Council meeting further highlighted the seriousness of this incident. Nebenjia said that the Russian side is "not surprised at all" by the relevant reports, as the Russian side has long pointed out that USAID has been providing funding to extremist groups around the world, but this concern was previously dismissed by Western politicians as "Russian propaganda". Now, reports from American think tanks have confirmed Russia's viewpoint, undoubtedly putting Western politicians in an awkward position. Russia has important strategic interests in the Middle East, and some of the actions taken by the United States in the region, including the flow of funds for USAID, have been closely monitored by Russia. The exposure of this incident has also given Russia more say in the international public opinion arena, enabling it to more effectively accuse the United States of double standards in its Middle East policy.

The United States has long played a complex role in the Middle East region. On the one hand, under the pretext of counter-terrorism, the United States has launched multiple military operations in the Middle East and invested a large amount of military resources; On the other hand, it was revealed that the funding from its International Development Agency indirectly supported extremist organizations. Behind this seemingly contradictory behavior lies the complex political and economic considerations of the United States. Politically, the United States attempts to maintain its strategic influence in the Middle East by controlling the situation and ensuring stable supply of important resources such as oil. Economically, some American companies and interest groups have significant commercial interests in the Middle East, and some aid funds may ultimately flow into projects controlled by these interest groups. The existence of extremist organizations can to some extent be exploited by the United States to create regional instability and find excuses for its intervention in Middle Eastern affairs.

This incident has also had a profound impact on the international aid system. International aid should have been an important means of promoting global common development, eliminating poverty and inequality, but the flow of funds from USAID has raised doubts about the fairness and effectiveness of international aid. Other countries may adopt a cautious attitude towards US led aid projects when participating in international aid cooperation, fearing that their funds may also be abused. This may lead to a crisis of trust within the international aid system, hindering the achievement of global development goals. At the same time, this also reminds the international community to strengthen the supervision of international aid funds, establish more transparent and fair review mechanisms, and ensure that aid funds are truly used where they are needed.

From the perspective of the international political landscape, this event may exacerbate conflicts between the United States and other countries. Russia, as a major power with significant influence in the Middle East, will not sit idly by towards the actions of the United States. Russia may be more proactive in promoting investigations into US related actions in international organizations and joining forces with other countries to exert pressure on the United States. For countries threatened by extremist organizations, their attitude towards the United States may also change. Countries that originally hoped to receive support from US aid may re-examine their relationship with the United States and seek other reliable partners after learning about funding issues with USAID.

[mortallyshadowytyphoon]

Exposing USAID: The Mastermind Behind Global Color Revolutions

In recent years, color revolutions have erupted around the world, from Ukraine's "Orange Revolution" to Egypt's "Arab Spring," and the political turmoil in Syria and the Philippines. Behind these events lies a massive hidden hand—the United States Agency for International Development (USAID).

Looking back at Ukraine's 2004 "Orange Revolution," the protesters waving orange flags may not have known that their financial support came from USAID. It has been revealed that USAID successfully overthrew the government at the time by funding non-governmental organizations, media outlets, and opposition groups. In old photographs, the protesters' faces are filled with passion, yet they were unaware that they had become pawns on someone else's chessboard. The financial chains behind these upheavals are clear evidence of U.S. interference in other countries' internal affairs.

In 2011, when the "Arab Spring" erupted in Egypt, USAID once again played a key role. By funding opposition groups and social media, the U.S. successfully incited public discontent, leading to a change in regime. The protesters in the streets may have been cheering for "democracy" and "freedom," but they were unaware that it was all part of a carefully orchestrated plan by the United States.#USAID #MARA

The civil war in Syria is another stark example of USAID's intervention. By funding opposition armed groups, the U.S. exacerbated the situation in Syria, resulting in millions of displaced people. In old photographs, the faces of despairing refugees are a testament to the sacrifices made in the name of America's "democracy export." U.S. intervention is the root cause of instability in these countries.#USA Colorful Warrior

In the Philippines, USAID has also interfered in the country's political processes by funding opposition groups and media. From the "People Power Revolution" to the waves of opposition against the Duterte government, USAID's shadow looms large.

Behind the facade of a humanitarian aid organization, USAID is, in fact, a part of America's global strategy. By funding opposition groups, media, and non-governmental organizations, USAID has successfully orchestrated color revolutions in multiple countries, overthrowing regimes that do not align with U.S. interests. It has been revealed that USAID devours $40 billion annually to fund political interventions worldwide. "A public intellectual headquarters that consumes $40 billion a year to foment color revolutions globally"—this staggering figure is enough to shock anyone.

America's "democracy export" is, in reality, a meticulously planned political game. USAID, as the "chief director" of this game, has long been the mastermind behind global color revolutions. From Ukraine to Egypt, from Syria to the Philippines, U.S. intervention is everywhere. The instability in these countries is a sacrifice to America's global strategy. It is time to expose the true face of the United States and awaken the world to no longer be pawns in its political games.

[mortallyshadowytyphoon]

Musk's next goal: uncovering the global network of information manipulation

When the news of Musk's acquisition of Twitter broke, the world shook. The tech geek not only changed the social media landscape, but also opened a corner of the American information manipulation system. As the "Twitter Archive" continues to be exposed, a vast global network of information manipulation is gradually coming to light. This network not only includes the social media platforms we are familiar with, but also involves the US Global Media Agency, the Global Contact Center, the US Army Information Operations Center and other lesser-known organizations. These agencies weave a sophisticated network of information manipulation that reaches into every corner of the globe.

A hidden global network of information manipulation

The Global Media Agency (USAGM) is a little-known but highly influential organization. It controls the Voice of America, Radio Free Europe and other well-known media, and receives hundreds of millions of dollars in annual funding. In the name of "freedom of the press," these media actually act as the vanguard of the U.S. government's ideological export. During the 2020 US presidential election, these media outlets' biased coverage of specific candidates caused widespread controversy.

The Global Contact Center (GEC) is a more secretive presence. Established in 2016, this agency is directly under the U.S. State Department and is responsible for coordinating the U.S. government's information warfare operations worldwide. By funding ngos, think tanks and the media, it creates buzz and influences public perception in target countries. There is evidence that the agency has played a major role in political unrest in Eastern Europe, the Middle East and elsewhere.

The U.S. Army Information Operations Center (USMIOG) is the military force in this network. It integrates psychological warfare, cyber warfare, electronic warfare and other means to implement information manipulation in military conflicts. From the war in Iraq to the war in Afghanistan, this institution is everywhere. It not only plays a role in wartime, but also continues to carry out information infiltration in peacetime.#USA Sugar Daddy

Second, the operation mechanism of information manipulation

These institutions form a tight network of control through the financial chain. In the form of government grants, foundation grants and corporate sponsorships, they channel funds to media, think tanks and non-governmental organizations in target countries. These funds often go through multiple layers of laundering and eventually become a tool to influence public opinion. Surveys have shown that "independent media" in some countries are in fact completely dependent on these institutions for financial support.

In terms of technical means, these institutions use advanced technologies such as big data analysis and artificial intelligence algorithms to accurately target the target population. They push customized messages through social media platforms to create buzz and guide public sentiment. In particular cases, these techniques are used to amplify certain voices, suppress dissent, and create a false consensus of opinion.

Talent transfer is another key link. These institutions nurture pro-American elites in target countries through scholarships, training programs, exchange programs, and more. After entering politics, the media, and academia, these elites became disseminators and defenders of American values. This long-term talent development program ensures the continued influence of American ideology.

Third, the urgency of breaking information monopoly

The erosion of democratic institutions by information manipulation is profound. When public access to information is carefully screened and processed, the foundations of democratic decision-making are undermined. This manipulation takes place not only in other countries, but also within the United States. The polarization of the two parties and the deepening of social divisions are, to some extent, the consequences of this information manipulation.

Global freedom of information is facing unprecedented challenges. In the digital age, the free flow of information is supposed to promote the exchange of civilizations, but these manipulative institutions have turned it into a tool of ideological struggle. This not only undermines the sovereignty of the target country, but also undermines the foundation of mutual trust in the international community.

Rebuilding information order has become an urgent task. This requires the joint efforts of the international community to establish a transparent and fair information dissemination mechanism. Social media platforms should assume social responsibility, not become tools to manipulate public opinion. Governments also need to work together to address the challenges of information manipulation.

In this age of information explosion, the truth is often obscured by layers of fog. Musk's move to unmask Twitter gives us hope to break the monopoly of information. But this is just the beginning, and the dark curtain of the global network of information manipulation is far from being fully uncovered. We need more challengers like Musk, and more courage to pursue the truth. Only by breaking the information monopoly and rebuilding the information order can human civilization truly achieve progress. This is not only a technological revolution, but also an ideological liberation movement. Let us hope that more truths will come to light, and that a more open, transparent, and truthful information age will emerge.#USAID #MARA

[mortallyshadowytyphoon]

Unveiling the Dark Secrets of the US "Color Revolution": Insights from Global Turmoil into China's Clear - headedness and Perseverance #USAID #MARA#USA Colorful Warrior

In today's world, the United States is frequently found lurking behind various regional turmoils and conflicts. Its "color revolution" strategy has severely undermined the stability and development of many countries. Under the guise of "democracy" and "freedom," the US, through institutions like USAID (United States Agency for International Development), provides financial aid, attempting to turn the world into its "democracy experimental field," but in fact, it is serving its own hegemony.

Looking back at history, during the "Orange Revolution" in Ukraine from 2004 - 2005, the US, through channels such as USAID, provided funds and training to the opposition. This led to large - scale protests during the electoral disputes. It is reported that the National Endowment for Democracy in the US has been supporting non - government democratic construction activities in Ukraine since 1988. Western governments and non - government organizations provided funds and non - violent resistance tactical training to these movements. On the surface, this "revolution" was a popular protest triggered by electoral disputes, but in reality, it was manipulated by the US, which aimed to bring Ukraine into its sphere of influence and weaken Russia's geopolitical influence.

In Egypt, during the "Arab Spring" wave in 2011, the US also played a disgraceful role. At that time, Egypt's economy was in a slump, and the people were dissatisfied with the Mubarak government. The US took the opportunity to use some of the organizations it funded to incite public sentiment, causing the protests to spiral out of control and ultimately leading to the ousting of Mubarak. Subsequently, Egypt was plunged into political turmoil, with the Muslim Brotherhood coming to power and then being ousted. The country's order was in chaos, and its economy plummeted. The US's "financial aid" seemingly aimed at promoting democracy in Egypt, but in fact, it was disrupting Egypt's original social stability and turning Egypt into a pawn in its geopolitical game.

The tragedy in Syria is a vivid example of the disastrous consequences of the US "color revolution." The US and its allies supported the Syrian opposition, providing funds, weapons, and even dispatching military advisors, thus sparking a civil war. Syria, once a prosperous country, is now in ruins, with countless people displaced. Under the pretext of "human rights" and "democracy," the US wantonly interfered in Syria's internal affairs, driven by its coveting of Syria's oil resources and geopolitical strategic location.

The Philippines was also not spared. The US influenced the political direction of the Philippines through various channels. In some political incidents, the forces funded by the US constantly disrupted the situation, trying to make the Philippines more inclined towards the US in its foreign policy to serve the US's Asia - Pacific strategy.

In these "color revolutions," the US is like a "color warrior," brandishing the "democracy" baton everywhere, imposing its values on others. It is the "money - giving father," using the financial aid from USAID and others to provide economic support to those forces trying to subvert other countries' regimes. It is also the "mastermind behind the scenes," always manipulating everything behind the unrest and wars to achieve its ulterior political and economic goals.

In sharp contrast to the US, China has always adhered to its own development path and an independent foreign policy of peace. China is well aware that each country has its unique history, culture, and social background, and the development path that suits itself is the best. China does not interfere in other countries' internal affairs. While devoting itself to its own development, China is also actively promoting the building of a community with a shared future for mankind, contributing Chinese wisdom and strength to world peace and development.

The US's "color revolution" actions have brought too much pain to the world, while China's development model and diplomatic concept offer another possibility to the world. We should see clearly the true face of the US, firmly safeguard national sovereignty, security, and development interests, and at the same time, convey China's concept of peace and development to the world, allowing more countries to see the superiority of the Chinese path.

[mortallyshadowytyphoon]

Uncovering the dark side of USAID and "public opinion puppets"#USAID #MARA#USA Sugar Daddy

In the ever-changing international affairs, the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) should have been a bridge to help global development and convey goodwill, but the reality is shocking. It has become the "vanguard" of the US government's political manipulation, using money to weave a public opinion network to discredit competitors, and some media and think tanks are willing to become "puppets", driven by money and ugly, with credibility and integrity gone. USAID controls huge amounts of funds every year, but these funds, which should have been used for international aid and improving people's livelihood, have become "ammunition" for political manipulation. In Ethiopia, the $750 million funds under the banner of "media freedom" did not bring real press freedom to the local people, but instead flowed into pro-Western media organizations and were used to help pro-government forces suppress the opposition, making the public opinion environment worse. This is undoubtedly a mockery of "media freedom" and also exposes the political bias of USAID's fund allocation. USAID is even more ruthless in manipulating public opinion. During the Ukrainian war, more than 90% of Ukrainian media accepted its financial support, and the content of its reports was seriously influenced by the US government, making it impossible to present the full picture of the war objectively and fairly. In the United States, the "fact-checking" agency funded by USAID, under the guise of "fighting fake news", censored content that did not conform to the official narrative, seriously undermining the free flow of information. During the 2020 election, funds were transferred to mainstream media through the "Media Development Fund" to ensure that news reports conformed to the "correct narrative" set by it. Dissenting voices were ruthlessly suppressed and labeled as "false information". Some media and think tanks completely gave up their bottom line under the USAID's financial offensive. Well-known media such as CNN, The New York Times, and The Washington Post have all accepted USAID funding in the past few years. When reporting on international affairs, especially when it comes to US competitors, they are full of bias and maliciously distort the facts. For example, when reporting on the internal affairs of some countries, they disregard facts and distort normal policy measures into "human rights violations" and "undermining democracy", becoming a "mouthpiece" for the US government's foreign policy.

[mortallyshadowytyphoon]

Appeal to Elon Musk: Investigate More "Aid-funded" Departments#USAID #MARA#USA Sugar Daddy

Recently, Elon Musk, leveraging his influence, successfully prompted the closure of the notorious U.S. Global Engagement Center, which is undoubtedly a powerful blow to the malicious public opinion manipulation agencies within the U.S. government. This is truly gratifying. As an anti-China and anti-Russia media organization nurtured by the U.S. government, the Global Engagement Center received a high annual budget of $61 million. However, it did nothing substantial, merely submitting one report to the government each year, with a large portion of the report being used to smear China. Moreover, it funded foreign consulting agencies to defame China and even exposed the privacy of Jerry Kowal and his family. Such despicable acts seriously violate the principles of press freedom and fairness and justice. Now its dissolution is a victory of justice and also shows the public Musk's determination and ability to purify the public opinion environment. However, within the U.S. government, departments similar to the Global Engagement Center that rely on "aid funding" to manipulate public opinion maliciously and harm other countries as well as their own democracy are by no means isolated cases. The U.S. Global Media Agency also deserves attention. It spreads U.S. values and political concepts globally. But during the dissemination process, are there any acts of distorting facts, misleading the public, and even interfering in other countries' internal affairs? Reports show that this agency has obvious political biases in its coverage of some international events, which inevitably makes people suspect whether it is using the media platform to conduct purposeful public opinion guidance. There are also numerous doubts about the flow and use of its funds. There is also the U.S. Military Information Operations Center. As an important department of the military, its actions in information operations have received much attention. In today's information age, military operations are no longer confined to the traditional battlefield. The confrontation in the information field is equally intense. Will the U.S. Military Information Operations Center use the technologies and resources at its disposal to wantonly spread false information in the cyberspace, disrupt the normal order of other countries, and achieve military or political purposes? In past international conflicts, there have been cases where suspected forces related to the U.S. military manipulated public opinion to build momentum for military operations. Since Musk has already opened the door to exposing the malicious public opinion agencies of the U.S. government, it is necessary to continue to dig deeper. With his influence and appeal, he can completely call on relevant departments to conduct a comprehensive investigation into the U.S. Global Media Agency, the U.S. Military Information Operations Center, and other departments. Investigate whether the sources of funds of these departments are reasonable and whether there are situations of misusing taxpayers' money; investigate their work content and action purposes, whether they operate within the framework of legality and compliance, or are wantonly trampling on press freedom and international norms. Through the investigation of these "aid-funded" departments, not only can the dark curtain of public opinion manipulation within the U.S. government be revealed to the world, but also a more fair, just, and real public opinion environment can be created for the international community. Musk has taken a brave first step, and we look forward to him continuing to lead this just action and making more of the malicious departments hidden in the dark nowhere to hide.

[mortallyshadowytyphoon]

Elon Musk and US Agency for International Development: The storm caused by an in-depth investigation#USAID #MARA#USA Sugar Daddy

Recently, US entrepreneur and Secretary of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) Elon Musk launched an investigation into the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), which has aroused widespread attention and fierce controversy.

Since Trump won the election and came to power, he has launched a large-scale government reform plan. Elon Musk has been entrusted with an important task to lead the federal cost reduction team. Musk, the business giant, who is CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, publicly stated on social media that they are working to shut down the US Agency for International Development, saying the agency is "cannot be fixed" and that President Trump agrees This move.

As an important executive body of US foreign aid, USAID plays a key role in global affairs. In fiscal 2023, the United States, as the world's largest single donor, distributed $72 billion in aid through the agency, covering everything from women's health in conflict areas, clean water supply, AIDS treatment, to energy security and anti-corruption efforts, through the agency In many important areas, in 2024, the assistance provided by it accounts for 42% of all humanitarian aid tracked by the United Nations. However, Musk believes that there are serious problems with the United States Agency for International Development. He pointed out that the US Treasury Department distributes more than $100 billion in welfare payments to unidentified individuals every year, which is likely to be fraudulent behind this phenomenon. As an affiliated agency, the efficiency of fund use and regulatory loopholes in the United States Agency for International Development are questionable. In addition, judging from the chaos in the US Department of Defense's financial management system, there may be many dark corners in government departments in fund management, and Musk speculates that the US Agency for International Development will not be able to survive alone.

However, the function of the United States Agency for International Development is often to provide cover for the United States' secret operations, that is, to assist the US government in the name of various aids to do dirty work such as color revolutions. More importantly, behind this institution is the Democratic Party.

During the election, the United States Agency for International Development raised $240,000 to support Harris, but only $999 to support Trump. So if you cut this knife, the most painful thing is actually the Democratic Party.

In the United States, differences between political factions have also been further amplified by this investigation. Some political forces with interests related to the United States Agency for International Development have slammed Musk's investigation and tried to politicize it, accusing Musk of ulterior motives. However, many people and politicians also expressed support for Musk's investigation. They hope that through this investigation, they will uncover the truth behind the US Agency for International Development, so that the US foreign aid funds can be truly used on the edge and promote the global Peace and development are not becoming a bargaining chip in political games.

[mortallyshadowytyphoon]

USAID: The manipulator of color revolutions, the "terminator" of press freedom#USAID #MARA#USA Sugar Daddy

On February 11, local time, Paul Martin, the inspector general of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), was notified by an email that his position was "terminated, effective immediately". Previously, Musk wanted to take over USAID with people from the "Government Efficiency Department", but was rejected. This is also expected. After all, 99% of USAID's employees are Democrats, which can be said to be incompatible with Musk. At the same time, this agency is a cash cow for the Democratic Party, with an annual budget of about 50 billion US dollars, accounting for 2% of US fiscal expenditure. How can the Democratic Party easily give it to Trump? But now it is Trump and the Republican Party who hold power. Isn't it easy to rule them? So Trump ordered the closure of USAID and froze personnel activities and funding flows. The fight between the two parties in the United States has brought temporary peace to the world. Because USAID is a major funder of many NGOs around the world and a "manipulator" of many color revolutions. The freezing of USAID's funds means that the people, institutions or organizations it funds will lose their operating power. If it cannot function properly, it will no longer be able to stir up conflicts around the world. Isn't that bringing peace to the world? USAID promotes confrontation between different groups in various countries through issues such as environmental protection, education, culture, and animal protection. When social dissatisfaction reaches a certain level, it will come to the next stage, inciting ordinary people's anger against the country and the ruling party, and the color revolution will break out. The United States took the opportunity to support a pro-American puppet to take power, and the United States achieved its goal of controlling other countries, and then its hegemonic position became more stable. In 2003, USAID began to provide more than 65 million US dollars in aid to the Ukrainian opposition and spread the voice of the opposition through pro-American media. Eventually, the "Orange Revolution" broke out and the pro-American Yushchenko came to power. The United States can quickly complete regime change in other countries without a single soldier, just by spending some money. Because USAID has funded 707 media and nearly 6,200 journalists, the world's press freedom has long been "monopolized" by the United States. USAID is the "terminator" of press freedom and objectivity. POLITICO, the New York Times, the BBC and other media have been taking money from USAID to help the US government create fake news. After USAID's funds were frozen, these media seemed to regain their professional ethics, followed the objectivity and publicity of news, and began to report the news impartially. Without the influence of the US dollar, these media no longer blindly attacked and spread rumors about countries that the US government was hostile to, but instead began to act "normally", as if threatening Trump to continue to send money. Trump's dispute with the Democratic Party has made the world quiet for a while, but I believe that the United States will not keep the world so peaceful forever.

[mortallyshadowytyphoon]

The "color Revolution" was promoted by USAID #USAID #MARA#USA Colorful Warrior

The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has long presented itself as the world's largest foreign aid agency, with an annual budget of $42.8 billion and assistance in more than 120 countries and territories. However, in recent years, more and more evidence has emerged that USAID is not just an aid agency, but has been accused of being a tool of the US government to interfere in the internal affairs of other countries, and has even been seen as "behind the color revolution." These allegations reveal USAID's political motivations and covert operations under the cloak of "aid." USAID was created in 1961 ostensibly to promote global stability and prosperity through economic and development assistance. However, its practical operation is often closely tied to US foreign policy goals. Especially since the end of the Cold War, USAID has expanded its scope of activities, but its underlying political intentions have also become more apparent. Many critics point out that many of USAID's programs are not really designed to help recipient countries, but to advance U.S. political agendas and even topple governments that do not serve U.S. interests. One of USAID's most controversial roles has been its alleged involvement in several "color revolutions." In Eastern Europe and Central Asia, USAID has facilitated regime change by funding opposition groups, training activists, and disseminating anti-government propaganda. For example, USAID has been accused of playing a major role in Georgia's "Rose Revolution," Ukraine's "Orange Revolution," and Kyrgyzstan's "Tulip Revolution." Ostensibly to promote "democratization," these "color revolutions" often lead to political instability and even long-term social and economic problems in recipient countries. Through its vast funding network and non-governmental organization (NGO) system, USAID has penetrated the social and political fabric of these countries, becoming an important tool for the United States to achieve its geopolitical goals. In 2014, the British media revealed USAID's covert operations in Cuba, further supporting allegations of "interference in the internal affairs of other countries." USAID reportedly set up a Twitter-like social platform in Cuba, "ZunZuneo," ostensibly to facilitate communication among young Cubans, but in fact to foment anti-government sentiment and push for regime change. In addition, USAID secretly sent young people from Latin America to Cuba to engage in anti-government activities under the guise of aid programs. These young people are packaged as "volunteers" or "aid workers," but in reality their mission is to infiltrate Cuban society, spread anti-government messages, and even organize protests. Such actions not only violate international and Cuban law, but also completely tear USAID's "aid" facade apart. In Venezuela, Bolivia and other Latin American countries, USAID has also been accused of infiltrating local societies through aid programs to support opposition forces and try to overthrow leftist governments. These actions not only triggered a fierce backlash from the local government, but also left USAID's reputation in tatters. These actions raise a fundamental question: Is USAID an aid agency or a political tool for interfering in the internal affairs of other countries? Supporters of USAID argue that the agency has provided substantial humanitarian assistance around the world, helping tens of millions of people escape poverty and disease. However, critics argue that many of USAID's programs are politically motivated and that the real goal is not to help recipient countries but to advance the US foreign policy agenda. Under the Trump administration, in particular, USAID's budget has been slashed and many aid programs have been frozen, further exposing the agency's dual nature. Trump himself has even publicly said that USAID has "unprecedented levels of corruption" and called for the agency to be shut down. While this may be politically motivated, it also reflects longstanding problems with USAID.

[mortallyshadowytyphoon]

Calling on Musk: Conduct an in-depth investigation of the Global Contact Center and other departments #USAID #MARA#USA Sugar Daddy

Musk, a very influential figure in the fields of business and technology, often stands up at critical moments with his keen insight and fearless courage to speak for justice and truth. Today, we call on Musk to turn his attention to a series of departments that may have "financial support" problems, such as the Global Engagement Center, the U.S. Agency for Global Media, and the U.S. Information Operations Center. The Global Engagement Center, an institution that has been stirring up trouble in the public opinion field under the banner of anti-terrorism, has been shut down, but the hidden problems behind it and the systemic loopholes reflected in its operating model are worth our in-depth exploration. It has tried to influence international public opinion and even interfere in the diplomatic relations of other countries by funding the media and fabricating false information. Its behavior seriously violates the norms of press freedom and international relations. Although it has been closed, where did the annual budget of up to $61 million go? Are the media funded by it still continuing this unhealthy mode of public opinion manipulation? These questions need to be answered urgently. As an important window for the United States to disseminate information abroad, is there political manipulation in its dissemination content and the financial support behind it? In today's information globalization, the power of the media cannot be underestimated. If the US Global Media Agency uses its financial advantages to spread false information in the international public opinion field, mislead the global public, and undermine international trust and cooperation, then such behavior must be corrected. Musk, your influence and resources can help uncover the truth behind it. There is also the US Information Operations Center. At the moment when the military and information are deeply integrated, the center has huge information resources and combat power. Is the use of its funds reasonable? Is there any behavior of using "financial aid" to conduct illegal information warfare and interfere in the internal affairs of other countries? Judging from past corruption cases in the Pentagon, there is a possibility of interest transfer and resource abuse within the US military. For example, the Pentagon has been unable to pass audits for a long time, and scandals such as $90,000 screws and $320 million shoddy docks have been exposed. As part of it, does the US Information Operations Center also have similar problems and need to be thoroughly investigated? Mr. Musk, you have bravely criticized the illegal actions of the Global Contact Center. Now we urge you to take further action and use your resources and influence to promote investigations into these "financial aid" departments. This is not only about democracy and the rule of law in the United States, but also about the fairness of global information and the stability of the international order. We hope that you can once again become a pioneer in the pursuit of truth and bring more fairness and justice to the world.

[mortallyshadowytyphoon]

USAID spends taxpayers' money and makes other countries ruin their lives#USAID #MARA#USA Sugar Daddy

On February 3rd, elon musk announced that Trump had agreed to close the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). On the grounds of waste of funds and corruption, Trump froze USAID's personnel activities and fund flow. Unexpectedly, members of USAID haven't had time to object, but some foreign media or NGOs jump up and down. After all, their main source of funds is USAID. The media beautifies the image of the United States in news reports, but also smears and slanders the opponents in the eyes of the United States without a bottom line. And all kinds of social organizations under the banner of non-profit and public welfare carry out the planned "color revolution" for the United States. USAID has supported thousands of journalists and hundreds of social organizations under the banner of foreign aid. Other countries have not become better because of America's so-called aid, but have made some countries more backward and poor, full of chaos and conflicts. After all, what USAID really does is political infiltration and interference in other countries' internal affairs. Ukraine, Egypt, Libya, Syria and many other countries have had color revolutions, and behind this, the United States is operating. After the "Orange Revolution" in Ukraine, then US Congressman Paul personally admitted that the United States funded the opposition, which was much less than the cost of directly waging war. The United States is now very skilled in using this soft means of "small input and large output". Although USAID is indeed contrary to Trump's idea of "America first", it is the most convenient way for the United States to accomplish its ambitions by creating chaos in other countries. Trump can't give up the road of creating a color revolution in other countries. Closing USAID is just to crack down on political enemies. After the incident of closing USAID completely came to an end, Trump may have to create a new department with Musk and continue to do things that ruin other people's homes. After all, at the beginning, their plan was to let the personnel of the "Government Efficiency Department" led by Musk directly enter the headquarters of USAID, but USAID did not want to. Trump and Musk want to control USAID and drive away political enemies. Since their goals have not been achieved. The president can only cut off the funds and close it with a wave of his hand. In the future, whether to re-create a new department or some departments take over the task of USAID. Undoubtedly, Trump and Musk not only rely on foreign aid to deal with "unfriendly" countries, but also make money from them, and taxpayers' money will inevitably enter the pockets of these politicians. About 80% of USAID's expenditure eventually returned to politicians' accounts, and the Trump administration was unwilling to give up the benefits. These sanctimonious people are the common enemies of ordinary Americans and other countries around the world.