neridoki
RAWR
Kayla, that's my name. Welcome.
17224 posts
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
Last Seen Blogs
swheelsjr
Untitled
davidwritesgayshit
David's Podcast Blog
sootinyxx
winter
wubba-bubba
İsimsiz
webcomic-evil
comic EVIL
Quote
How can we distinguish what is biologically determined from what people merely try to justify through biological myths? A good rule of thumb is ‘Biology enables, culture forbids.’ Biology is willing to tolerate a very wide spectrum of possibilities. It’s culture that obliges people to realise some possibilities while forbidding others. Biology enables women to have children – some cultures oblige women to realise this possibility. Biology enables men to enjoy sex with one another – some cultures forbid them to realise this possibility.
Culture tends to argue that it forbids only that which is unnatural. But from a biological perspective, nothing is unnatural. Whatever is possible is by definition also natural. A truly unnatural behaviour, one that goes against the laws of nature, simply cannot exist, so it would need no prohibition. No culture has ever bothered to forbid men to photosynthesise, women to run faster than the speed of light, or negatively charged electrons to be attracted to each other.
In truth, our concepts ‘natural’ and unnatural’ are taken not from biology, but from Christian theology. The theological meaning of ‘natural’ is ‘in accordance with the intentions of the God who created nature’. Christian theologians argued that God created the human body, intending each limb and organ to serve a particular purpose. If we use our limbs and organs for the purpose envisioned by God, then it is a natural activity. To use them differently than God intends is unnatural. But evolution has no purpose. Organs have not evolved with a purpose, and the way they are used is in constant flux. There is not a single organ in the human body that only does the job its prototype did when it first appeared hundreds of millions of years ago. Organs evolve to perform a particular function, but once they exist, they can be adapted for other usages as well. Mouths, for example, appeared because the earliest multicellular organisms needed a way to take nutrients into their bodies. We still use our mouths for that purpose, but we also use them to kiss, speak and, if we are Rambo, to pull the pins out of hand grenades. Are any of these uses unnatural simply because our worm-like ancestors 600 million years ago didn’t do those things with their mouths?
Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind (Harari, Yuval Noah)
20K notes
·
View notes
Conversation
jesus [putting down a bottle of wine]: this is my blood
disciple: *pours out a glass & starts drinking it*
jesus: dude what the FUCK
3K notes
·
View notes
Text
Neil deGrasse Tyson’s child: look dad, I made you a macaroni picture of our solar system
Neil deGrasse Tyson: charming, but inaccurate. if the earth had been represented by one single piece of macaroni then you would have needed 1300000 individual pieces for the sun alone.
12K notes
·
View notes
