network-security-concepts

[network-security-concepts]

How Dynamic Link Library Injection Attacks Compromise Mobile Apps

The Dynamic Link Libraries Injection (DLL) attack, a sophisticated cybersecurity technique, can have severe implications for Android and iOS app developers. This attack involves injecting malicious code by manipulating a DLL in the address space of a running program. Here is a technical breakdown of the attack.

Dynamic link libraries (DLLs): DLLs contain executable code that can be used by multiple applications to perform certain functions. The concept is common on Windows-based platforms but can also be used on other platforms.

Mechanism of Injection: An attacker can inject their DLL in the memory space, a legitimate process. Injection is possible through various methods, including process hollowing or reflective DLL injection. Hooking functions such as LoadLibrary can also be used.

Malicious Payload: Typically, the injected DLL contains malicious code. This code may perform various actions, including stealing sensitive information, altering the behavior or the legitimate process, and creating backdoors to further attacks.

Stealthiness DLL Injection Attacks are designed to be stealthy. Injection code is often designed to blend into the legitimate process. This obfuscation makes detection difficult.

Use Cases: Dynamic link library injection attacks achieve various purposes, including privilege escalation and keylogging. They can also spy on the user's activity or subvert security mechanisms in an application.

Mitigation Mobile application developers must ensure their code is secure to defend against dynamic link library injection attacks. Mitigation techniques include validating inputs and implementing secure coding. They also monitor for suspicious behavior during runtime. Code signing, code integrity checking, and address-space layout randomization (ASLR), among other techniques, can help stop injection attempts.

Platform-Specific Considerations: Due to Android and iOS security models, DLL injection on these platforms may differ from Windows. Android developers must be aware of native code interaction, whereas iOS developers must consider code signing and app sandboxing requirements.

A dynamic link library injection attack injects malicious code by manipulating a Dynamic Link Library. This technique severely threatens Android and iOS apps and requires security measures and vigilance to minimize the risks.

I recommend visiting MITRE and Zimperium's Mobile Security Glossary to learn more about mobile security.

[network-security-concepts]

IMSI Catchers Remain A Crucial Hacker Tool for MITM Attacks

In a Man-in-the-Middle Attack (MITM), the attacker intercepts and may alter communications between mobile devices and cellular networks. MITM attacks pose a severe threat to mobile application developers focused on cybersecurity. Here's an explanation of the technical details of how a hacker might use an IMSI catcher for an MITM.

IMSI catcher overview: A rogue IMSI (International Mobile Subscriber ID) catcher is a rogue device masquerading as an official cell tower. IMSI catcher sends a strong radio signal to lure nearby mobile phones, forcing them into connection.

Device Connectivity: Mobile devices will connect when they encounter the rogue IMSI catcher, as it assumes it is an actual cell tower based on its stronger signal.

Traffic Infiltration: After the mobile device connects, the IMSI catcher can intercept all communication between it and the legitimate cell network, including SMS, voice calls, and data traffic.

MITM-Attack: The IMSI catcher is an intermediary between the mobile phone and the cellular networks. IMSI catcher captures data between mobile devices and cellular networks, creating MITM position.

Packet Modification: At this stage, the attacker may inject malicious data or modify the communication stream. For example, the attacker can inject malware into the data packets sent between the device and the network.

Exfiltration of Data: The IMSI catcher captures sensitive information such as IMSI, IMEI, and user data.

Privacy Concerns This attack could violate users' privacy by giving attackers access to potentially sensitive information.

Mobile application developers must consider the security implications of IMSI catcher and MITM attacks. To protect mobile apps from such attacks, it is vital to implement encryption and secure communications protocols like TLS/SSL. In addition, users need to be educated on the importance of using secure connections and verifying their network connections.

I recommend visiting NIST and Zimperium's Mobile Security Glossary to learn more about mobile security.

[network-security-concepts]

How to Protect Your Phone From a SIM Spoofing Attack

Protecting your phone against SIM spoofing attacks requires taking several precautions. Attackers use SIM spoofing (SIM swapping or SIM hijacking) to take over your phone number and access accounts or sensitive information stored there. Here are some steps you can take to secure yourself:

Enable Two-Factor Authentication (2FA): Instead of relying solely on SMS-based two-factor authentication methods, consider employing app- or hardware-based two-factor authentication methods. Google Authenticator apps or hardware security keys offer more secure verification options.

Connect With Your Mobile Service Provider: Speak to your mobile service provider about adding additional security measures such as PIN or password to protect against SIM swaps and SIM cloning. This could prevent fraudulent SIM swapping.

Apply a Strong PIN/Password: It is wise to set a strong PIN or password for your mobile service provider account, avoiding easily guessable information such as birthdate or sequential numbers that might make guessing more likely.

Take Care with Personal Information: Be wary about sharing personal data such as your phone number or account details with unknown individuals, particularly on social media platforms or public forums.

Monitor Your Accounts: Monitor all your bank, email, and other critical online accounts regularly for suspicious activity and report any unauthorized access immediately to their respective service providers.

Be Wary of Phishing Attempts: Be mindful of any attempts at phishing through emails, texts, or phone calls. Do not click suspicious links or provide personal data unless sure about its source and legitimacy.

Password Security: Take Care in Generating Complex Passwords: For security, create strong and unique passwords for each account you access online - email, social media, and financial. Use a password manager for secure storage and generation of complex passwords.

Maintain Software Updates: Keeping software current can protect against potential vulnerabilities; therefore, it's advisable to upgrade both operating systems and applications on your phone regularly. Many updates also contain security patches that will protect against any known exploits.

Engage Biometric Authentication: When available, use biometric authentication methods such as fingerprint or face recognition to secure your phone and add another layer of security should your SIM be compromised.

Encrypt Your Phone to Safeguard Data: Activating encryption can protect the information stored on your phone from being exposed in case of unapproved access; deciphering encrypted communication will be more challenging for third parties than decrypted files.

Stay Informed: Stay aware of the latest security threats and techniques used by attackers, particularly SIM spoofing risks, to take measures necessary to safeguard both your phone and personal information.

Although these steps can help minimize SIM spoofing risks, it remains vitally important that users stay alert and practice caution when using their phones or sharing personal information online.

I recommend visiting NIST or Zimperium's Glossary to learn more about Mobile Security.

[network-security-concepts]

How Does Dynamic Code Loading Make Android Apps Less Secure?

Dynamic code loading (DCL) refers to an Android app's ability to dynamically load executable files during runtime rather than preloading everything at installation time. While dynamic code loading offers advantages in terms of flexibility and efficiency, improper implementation can create security risks that make applications less secure - here are a few ways dynamic code loading could make Android apps less safe:

Code Integrity: Dynamic code loading enables apps to download and execute code from remote servers or external sources, increasing the risk of downloading malicious or altered code that could compromise the integrity of an app and introduce security vulnerabilities.

Malware Injection: Apps that dynamically load code from untrusted sources or third-party plugins become more prone to malware injection, with attackers exploiting this technique to insert harmful code that could compromise user data, perform unapproved actions or gain control of the device.

Lack of Static Analysis: Static analysis tools like code analyzers or linters can be valuable tools in detecting potential security vulnerabilities during development, but dynamic code loading makes it challenging for such tools to identify security issues within dynamically loaded code since this data wasn't present during the static analysis phase.

Delay in Applying Security Patches: Apps that heavily utilize dynamic code loading can make applying security patches quickly a problematic feat since code is downloaded or loaded at runtime; thus, security vulnerabilities in dynamically loaded modules might go undetected until an updated code or module version becomes available - prolonging their exposure and giving attackers more opportunities to exploit known vulnerabilities.

Dynamic Code Loading Increases Attack Surface: Dynamic code loading increases an app's attack surface by creating additional entryways for malicious actors to penetrate. Malicious actors could exploit network communication for downloading code or weaknesses within its dynamic loading mechanism to gain entry and potentially gain unauthorized access, data leakage, or privilege escalation.

For optimal security, application developers should follow best practices when loading dynamic code, such as:

Secure communication protocols such as HTTPS should be utilized when downloading code from remote servers. Using cryptographic techniques, code dynamically loaded from these servers should also be verified for integrity.

Regularly monitor and update dynamically loaded modules to comply with the latest security patches. Only load code from trustworthy sources and ensure appropriate code signing mechanisms are in place.

Implement runtime security mechanisms, such as input validation and sandboxing, to minimize any impact from potential vulnerabilities.

Developers can balance DCL benefits and Android application security by taking these precautions.

I recommend visiting NIST and Zimperium's Glossary to learn more about mobile security,

[network-security-concepts]

How Does Anti-Debugging Make Mobile Devices More Secure?

Anti-debugging techniques are utilized in software development to protect applications against unauthorized access, reverse engineering, and tampering with them. By employing anti-debugging measures on mobile devices, anti-debugging steps can help make them more secure. Here are a few ways this increases mobile device security:

Protect against Reverse Engineering: Anti-debugging techniques can make it challenging for attackers to reverse engineer mobile applications. By obfuscating code and employing anti-reverse engineering mechanisms, developers can prevent attackers from understanding its inner workings - which protects sensitive algorithms, encryption keys, and proprietary business logic from being exposed.

Preventing runtime analysis: Attackers often use debuggers to conduct runtime analysis on an application, identify vulnerabilities, or inject malicious code. Anti-debugging techniques can detect the presence of a debugger and reduce its functionality - making it harder for attackers to analyze and exploit vulnerabilities. Anti-debugging techniques can detect when code has been altered in an application and protect it against attacks such as code injection, hooking, and method swizzling - methods that could compromise security by manipulating its behavior and security policies.

Protection of Sensitive Data: Mobile applications typically deal with sensitive user data such as login credentials, financial details, and personal information that should remain protected from external parties. Anti-debugging measures can assist in safeguarding this data by making it more challenging for attackers to intercept, alter or steal it from memory within applications.

Mitigating Runtime Attacks: Anti-debugging techniques can detect and prevent runtime attacks such as buffer overflows, format string vulnerabilities, or heap spraying by employing various safeguards to make it harder for attackers to exploit vulnerabilities that enable malicious code execution.

Notably, while anti-debugging techniques provide an additional layer of security, they cannot ensure complete protection for mobile devices. Experienced attackers could still find ways to bypass or overcome such measures. Therefore, employing a comprehensive security strategy with practices like secure coding, encryption, communication protocols, and regular updates is vital as part of a comprehensive solution for keeping mobile devices safe.

I recommend visiting OWASP and Zimperium’s Mobile Security Glossary to learn more about mobile security.

[network-security-concepts]

What is the Role of Anti-reverse Engineering in Mobile Application Security?

Anti-reverse-engineering methods protect mobile apps against being reverse-engineered. Reverse engineering is decompiling source code and analyzing it to understand how an application works. This practice can be used maliciously to steal sensitive information or create counterfeit applications.

Anti-reverse engineering makes it harder for attackers to reverse engineer programs by hiding code, encrypting data, or using any other method. Anti-reverse engineering techniques also prevent attackers from accessing sensitive data in an application.

Various anti-reverse-engineering techniques can be used to safeguard mobile apps. Some of the most commonly used methods include:

Code Obfuscation. Code Obfuscation. Code obfuscation can be achieved by adding classes or renaming functions and variables.

Data encryption. Encryption protects sensitive information by preventing its extraction. This security method can encrypt data before it's stored or transferred from a device to a computer.

Runtime protection. Runtime protection prevents attackers from debugging or changing applications while they are running. This method includes code-signing, the sandboxing procedure, and others. If you're interested in learning more about runtime protection, visit Zimperium.

Anti-reverse technology can be an essential part of mobile app security. By using anti-reverse technologies, developers can make it a more difficult task for hackers and attackers to reverse engineer their apps and access sensitive data.

Here are some advantages of using anti-reverse engineering techniques.

These systems can prevent sensitive data from being stolen or manipulated maliciously by apps. In addition, these systems make it harder for attackers and discourage them from targeting applications in the future to alter an app's behavior.

Like other security measures, anti-reverse-engineering techniques should not be considered a panacea. They can be bypassed by skilled attackers or negatively affect an app's performance. Instead, anti-reverse engineering measures and other security methods like code reviews and pen testing should be used to maximize effectiveness.

[network-security-concepts]

What are BYOD Security Policy Considerations and Best Practices?

BYOD policies (Bring Your Own Devices) allow employees to use their devices for work. BYOD can be a great way to reduce software and hardware costs while increasing employee productivity and flexibility. However, BYOD can pose some security risks. Therefore, organizations should consider the risks when establishing a BYOD security policy.

Best practices for BYOD security policies:

Use Strong Passwords. Employees should use strong passwords for their work-related devices and multifactor authentication to protect against the possibility of lost or stolen devices or unauthorized access. This will prevent accidental device theft or loss and any unintended entries.

Employers may use MDM for managing and protecting employee devices. For example, MDM can be used to manage and protect employee mobile devices. MDM includes tracking device usage and installing security policies.

Educate employees about security risks. Employees should be informed about the threats of BYOD devices, software, and devices. They should also be taught about the importance of multifactor verification, strong passwords, and how to identify phishing.

Make provisions for lost or stolen devices. Employees are required to report stolen or lost devices immediately to IT. The IT department can then wipe them remotely and prevent unauthorized access to company data.

Classify and Prioritize Data. The importance and sensitivity of data in an organization should be classified. Prioritizing data can help determine if it should be stored on company or individual devices.

Encrypt data. To prevent sensitive information from being intercepted by third parties or transmitted over the Internet on personal devices, sensitive data should both be locally and remotely encoded.

Implement physical security. Organizations must protect personal devices from theft and physical damage. Physical security includes locking devices and using other security measures like screen locks.

Educate users Employees should be educated on the security risks associated with BYOD and how to protect company data. The course covers password security, device safety, phishing attacks, and other issues.

By implementing BYOD security policies, organizations can reduce the risks associated with BYOD devices and protect their data.

[network-security-concepts]

Can a Mobile Phone Be Infected with Malware by Juice Jacking?

Yes, juice jacking can infect your mobile phone with malware. Juice jacking, a cyberattack using USB charging ports, is used to steal data from phones or infect them with malware. For example, when you plug your phone into a public USB port, an attacker can gain control and install malicious software. This malware captures personal data such as passwords, credit card numbers, and contact details. It can also track the phone or take control of its cameras or microphones.

Never plug your phone into a USB port on a public computer. Use a power outlet instead or an anti -juice-jacking USB condom, which blocks data transfer when your phone is plugged into a USB.

Updating your operating system and applications is another recommendation. Use strong passwords for your online accounts and enable 2FA/MFA authentication. Finally, be aware of the dangers of connecting to public WiFi networks and what information you share online. Follow these recommendations to help protect yourself from cyber attacks like juice jacking.

To learn more about juice jacking and how to enhance mobile security, visit our friends at Zimperium.

[network-security-concepts]

Establishing a Defensive Vulnerability Pricing Model

Knowing how much to budget and payout is a crucial success factor if you’re a security professional responsible for your organization’s bug bounty program. Bugcrowd has created an invaluable guide to establishing your defensive vulnerability pricing model.

Taken from nearly 1,000 programs and seven years of experience running successful programs for organizations in more than 50 industries in over 30 countries, the guide focuses explicitly on defensive vulnerability pricing for web and mobile applications, APIs, thick clients, and embedded devices. In addition, their defensive vulnerability pricing model applies to public and private, ongoing or time-boxed, crowdsourced security programs.

Security Maturity

Organizational security maturity is foundational for determining how to reward a vulnerability. An organization with a more mature security program has security-focused processes in place, and thus, vulnerabilities require more time and effort to find. 

While many different factors dictate the maturity of your security practice, the Enterprise Strategy Group has outlined three stages of security maturity:

·      Basic: “Cybersecurity is a necessary evil.”

·      Progressing: “Cybersecurity must be more integrated into the business.”

·      Advanced: “Cybersecurity is part of the culture.”

Bug Priority

Once a baseline maturity has been established, a context for the organization’s defensive vulnerability pricing model can be found. However, we need a priority for the vulnerability to select the specific payout. A bug is essential to the rewarding process because higher priority issues deserve higher rewards — they require more time, effort, and skill to identify. We must evaluate the vulnerability for technical and business impact to obtain priority. 

·      P1 – Critical: Vulnerabilities that cause a privilege escalation from unprivileged to admin or allow for remote execution, financial theft, etc.

·      P2 – High: Vulnerabilities that affect the security of the platform, including the processes it supports

·      P3 – Medium: Vulnerabilities that affect multiple users and require little or no user interaction to trigger.

·      P4 – Low: Vulnerabilities that affect singular users and require interaction or significant prerequisites to trigger.

·      P5 – Acceptable Risk: Non-explorable vulnerabilities in functionality. Vulnerabilities that are by design or are deemed an acceptable business risk to the customer.

Baseline Rates

Security maturity and submission priority are the most prominent variables when determining the value of a bug, and they give enough information to make a baseline recommendation for organizations.  Market bug rate prices:

·      P1: $2,000 – 20,000+

·      P2: $1,000 - $5,000

·      P3: $400 - $2,000

·      P4: $125 - $500

Additional Considerations

Target Criticality: If the organization handles mission-critical, highly sensitive, or valuable information (e.g., PII, PHI, financial data, etc.), it is prudent to consider increasing payouts to attract and retain talent quickly. 

Target Accessibility: If your targets require significant setups to test or other situational knowledge, it is helpful to modify the pricing to account for the ramp time. 

World Class Security Maturity: If an organization has a highly advanced security maturity and desires to attract the best security talent, multiply all base payouts by 2. This will keep you on par with some of the most prominent brands running bounty programs. 

Marketing Your Program: If an organization desires to utilize the program to market its security capabilities, it may increase payouts to provide the broader market with a clear indicator of security maturity. 

Visit Bugcrowd for more information about crowdsourced security and bug bounty program management.

[network-security-concepts]

Tips to Writing a Great VDP

Writing a VDP (also known as a vulnerability disclosure program) for security research is a valuable skill that can give you the upper hand in security research. Whether you're a security researcher looking to get paid or an IT professional looking to gain exposure, there are some basic guidelines to writing a VDP that you should follow. The most crucial step is to plan out the whole process from start to finish. While it's easy to become carried away by the rewards themselves, a well-written and structured VDP will ensure that it has the highest impact.

Once you've identified a vulnerability, identify a contact to receive any vulnerability disclosure reports. It's best to do this over a secure channel, but some organizations don't support this. When sending a message, provide sufficient information about the vulnerability. HTTP requests, HTML snippets, and screenshots should be provided to verify the vulnerability. Remember to redact any personal information that you may have received. Even if exposure is publicly known, it might be denied due to the lack of validation. You should be prepared to deal with this if you find it.

The best VDP should make it easy for security researchers to share their findings. When communicating with a host organization, it is best to offer a precise mechanism that allows for further details. Once you've disclosed a vulnerability, the organization should acknowledge it and request additional information. Then, the researchers should confirm that the organization has accepted the disclosure and offered a reward. When the data is verified, it's time for the company to make an appropriate patch and protect its systems.

Once a vulnerability has been discovered, the researcher should identify a contact for security research. Though many organizations don't support this, the initial report should be sent over an encrypted channel (though many organizations don't help this). The report should include sufficient information about the vulnerability, including screenshots, HTTP requests, and HTML snippets. If possible, the details should be redacted for privacy reasons. If the organization denies the exposure, it's worth following up with a proof of concept code or further reading.

When writing a VDP, identify the security contact for the organization. If the vulnerability is a critical one, identify the responsible party. Then, explain your exposure and provide a mechanism for further details. Then, communicate with the organization on the timeline and the reward. After you've identified the recipient, confirm the details. This should be a simple process, and the security team will likely be able to fix it in the future.

[network-security-concepts]

Protecting Your Website from Cross-Site Scripting (XXS)

Cross-Site Scripting is a security flaw found in specific web applications. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability to inject client-side code into a website. The scripts will bypass access controls and steal confidential information. You have many options to protect your website against this type of attack. The best way to do so is to use an HTTPS cert. Continue reading for more information. Let's get started with the basics.

Secure code is the first step to protect yourself against XSS attacks. Use security code review tools to protect yourself. You should also conduct regular penetration tests of your website. These tests will reveal if your website is at risk. It would help if you then implemented a strict anti-XSS policy. This will ensure that your website is secure. This will help you avoid being attacked.

Next, protect your website against XSS attacks. This is a crucial step to protect your website, even though it seems trivial. A firewall can catch malicious requests before they reach your website. But XSS could have a devastating impact on your business if your website is hacked. Recent research shows that 65% of users won't return to websites if they find out that their data has been stolen.

XSS can directly impact clients and organizations. For example, customers won't return to your website if attacked. This can cause severe reputation damage. XSS attacks can also cause reputational damage to your website. For example, the recent Magecart malware exploited an online vulnerability to steal credit card data. This information was then used to fraudulently purchase items.

XSS attacks pose a severe security risk. An attacker can insert a script into your website and inject malicious code. This code can be executed by your browser and could potentially cause damage to your users' data. A cross-site XSS attack could cause a website more harm than its money. The threat to an e-commerce website can have devastating consequences for its reputation and customer trust.

XSS is one of the most popular types of web attacks. This allows attackers to inject malicious code onto a benign website to steal its data. These scripts can take control of the website's permissions and alter data transfers between the site/client. For example, it is possible to hack websites that allow users to enter credit card information. An attack that succeeds can cause damage to a company's reputation, and customers may stop using the website.

Websites are often at risk from XSS attacks. These attacks are not dangerous to computers, despite their name. However, they can do considerable damage to websites and could be very dangerous for their reputation. XSS attacks can be a serious problem. These malicious codes can cause serious damage to your business. In addition, these vulnerabilities can be used to attack your website.

[network-security-concepts]

What is Code Injection?

Code injection is an attack technique that injects malicious code into a program. This attack exploits computer bugs that are caused by incorrect data. This makes a computer unusable and potentially dangerous. Code injection is an easy way to execute malicious codes. But, it is possible to fail to execute it successfully if you don’t know how it works.

Code injection is a hazardous attack technique. This involves inserting malicious code onto a website. It allows an attacker to pretend to be a legitimate user if successful. This is a common method for discovering vulnerabilities in software applications. This allows attackers to access a server-side interpreter and execute arbitrary code. An attacker can also access a server-side interpreter, executing arbitrary code.

Code injection can often be done by altering a website's code. The attacker will typically inject malicious code into a website’s source code. The attacker will attack a programming language in this instance. For example, he might attempt to attack Windows PowerShell or SQL Server. Both attacks require a Linux-based server. Therefore, you must ensure your website has the most current security measures.

An attacker can insert code into an application using a variety of methods. These include manually editing a cookie and creating a specially crafted file. An attacker can also inject malicious code into a website via a form. An attacker can modify your website's database values, making it inaccessible. This is usually done via HTML forms. An attack can be as simple as a redirect or spam comment. It can also have severe consequences for your company.

[network-security-concepts]

XML External Entities Vulnerability

What is XML External Entity Injection? By definition, "external entity" in XML is a synonym for "entity" - a thing created by an author. XML data may be transmitted over the network in a manner analogous to TCP/IP. However, instead of TCP or IP, XML data is sent as a markup language, with its vocabulary and rules.

XML external entity injections (also called XXE) are a web security vulnerability that allows attackers to manipulate an application's processing of XML information. For example, an XXE could allow an authorized user to submit malicious XML data to arbitrary web servers. Or an authorized user could use a special browser command to execute arbitrary code within the application's internals. In some cases, an attacker could also escalate an XXE to compromise the target server or other back-end infrastructure by leveraging the XML mentioned above vulnerability to do server-side script forgery (SSRF).

What are the different ways of exploiting XML External Entities? In general, these vulnerabilities can be controlled through two other methods. The first method is called an "XML External Entity Injection" attack. The attacker uses a program or tool to inject an XHTML entity or other HTML text or data into the target application. The attacker needs to create a form to submit the required entity to exploit this type of vulnerability. After successfully submitting the form, the browser will wait until the required entity is available before finally sending the document to the attacker's destination URL. If you have found websites offering free service or paid service, you can use their "get document element" feature to retrieve an appropriate entity from them.

The second method of XML External Entities exploitation is through "back-end scripting." In this case, the attacker uses a utility or script that runs on the targeted server after the successful submission of the entity. Once the script has been executed, the back-end application will run the same commands that it requests from the server (such as updating a database or generating output text) using the same XHR to communicate with the back-end server.

Now that you are familiar with the essential nature of this kind of vulnerability, you may be wondering how they can be exploited and how to protect yourself against them. To begin with, you can prevent XML External Entities by performing the proper steps in your development process. For example, to fix the "XML External Entities" problem, you can optimize your web servers' security configuration so that cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks are prevented. Another way to prevent XML External Entities is by using the XML Sitemap mechanism. This mechanism enables you to discover any hidden attack surface on your website by monitoring your visitors' links when accessing your site.

XML Sitemap is an essential component of the "XML External Entities" protection. By marking every incoming link as an "XML External Entities" link, you will effectively minimize the risk of XML External Entities. Moreover, you should disable the "XML External Entities" feature on your server-side code. Finally, you should perform regular database maintenance and update your application regularly to prevent blind vulnerabilities. By following these simple steps, you can improve the security of your website.

[network-security-concepts]

What Is a Bug Bounty Program?

What is a bug bounty program? A bug bounty program offers various software vendors, organizations, and websites that enable people to get recognition and monetary reward for reporting various bugs, particularly security vulnerabilities and flaws. If you find one or more bugs in your favorite computer program, web page, or game, it is recommended that you report this to the site or developer, as these may be used to gain access to privileged information on your system. For instance, if you find an error in the game Final Fantasy 15 that makes the game unplayable, you can inform the game's developers, and they will fix the said error before making the game available for sale in stores.

However, bug bounty programs appeal to companies and organizations because they cost less than traditional media like patches and antivirus utilities. In addition, organizations need to pay for security vulnerabilities fixes instead of just issuing a spot themselves because these vulnerabilities are known to be used by hackers to gain unauthorized access to a company's or network's confidential data. However, since these vulnerabilities have not yet been discovered, these types of flaws remain largely undetected. As a result, organizations need to pay for external security firms to find, document, and fix these security flaws.

In contrast, bug bounty programs provide individuals with the tools and information they need to identify security holes. These security researchers may work on free platforms such as Google Summer of Code or Bug Bears. Organizations may also hire outside security researchers from prominent IT organizations like Mcafee, Norton, or Vulnerability Assessment Systems International. However, since most IT professionals will be too busy working on their current projects, it is not surprising that many smaller organizations are now starting to utilize the services of outside security firms.

How does a bug bounty program work? Companies that hire bounty hunters will first have to determine the scope of the vulnerability that needs to be addressed. Afterward, they will need to select a reliable bug bounty program. This may be done by checking out a list of companies that offer such services. If the bug reports submitted by the bounty hunters seem vague or general, then it is best to search for more significant software vendors offering bounty programs. The programmers at these organizations will typically address more specific issues regarding a particular software program.

After a bug bounty program has been established, the organization will need to select its staff members to participate in the program carefully. Since most successful bounty hunters come from IT backgrounds, the selected employees must exploit security weaknesses found in online applications. Furthermore, the employees must also be experienced enough to handle the coding process, which will require them to understand and write efficient exploit code.

Bounty hunter employees conduct these penetration tests and vulnerability research to determine if hackers are using a specific software program to access secure areas of an organization's network. Through this process, the organizations need to identify the specific weak points of the program and develop ways to strengthen the security measures already in place. These measures can range from installing more robust software and firewalls to training employees on securing their networks. In addition, through the PIR (or vulnerability, risk, review) process, the vulnerability researchers help organizations learn more about how hackers take advantage of existing vulnerabilities and how they can prevent themselves from becoming a victim.

[network-security-concepts]

Open Web Application Security Project

Google creates the Open Web Application Security Project (OWASP) to enhance the security of publicly available information on the Internet. The project originated at the start of the 2000s when Google looked for ways to protect its search engine users against hackers better. Other prominent websites later adopted the project, including PayPal, Microsoft, Norton, and Citrix. Today it is one of the most significant information security projects of its kind.

The Open Web Application Security Project (OWASP) is an internet community that creates free and open sources in web application security. Recently, the project has been put on a year-long maintenance period, which should be kept open for everyone to use. A list of over one hundred security vulnerabilities has been published on the project's website in the past several months. A list of the most popular vulnerability types has also been made available. The project provides free security assessment services and free open source software development. The Open Web Application Security Project also has a listing of the top 10 vulnerable websites worldwide.

The list of the top ten most vulnerable websites was taken from the Alexa internet statistics tool. The list of the twenty most popular websites with comparatively fewer security risks was then selected. Finally, based on the analysis, the open-source software vulnerabilities were analyzed. The security project report showed that nearly half of the total number of vulnerable websites on the Internet are using WordPress or Drupal.

Some of the security threats faced by the Open Web Application Security Project developers are Heartbleed, SQL injection, cross-site scripting, and remote code execution. The report states that only twenty of the top ten list of the most popular websites are using Drupal 7.5 or 7.6, respectively. The researchers used these software programs to analyze the different vulnerabilities faced by the developers. The top ten list shows that almost fifty percent of the websites suffer from some or other vulnerabilities. In addition, it is estimated that more than fifty percent of the servers using the Linux operating system are vulnerable to Heartbleed.

The Open Web Application Security Project also released a second security report. This report highlights the need for continuous application security improvement. The researchers conducted a code review guide with the help of over four thousand developers who are part of the project. The code review guide provides information about the most common vulnerabilities facing the software and how the developers can guard against them. The report also states that the problem of Heartbleed is still at its initial stages, so it is impossible to say how long it will take to solve the problem. The Open Web Application Security Project states that it is working on reducing the number of errors that appear in the affected software to reduce the number of bugs.

The Open Web Application Security Project has been in operation since 2005, and it is prevalent among both professional developers and IT organizations. The project has contracted several companies, and the results show that they have reduced the general public's risks by 60 percent. In addition, the results of the tests show that the application security testing guide has helped reduce the risk of vulnerable software being exploited.

[network-security-concepts]

SQL Injection Vulnerability And What It Means To Your Company

SQL injection risks are just like any other risks. They can be rare or very common—either way, they have to be taken seriously. And you need to know what SQL injection looks like so you don't end up with a problem.

SQL injection is simple. It's when a SQL statement is written wrong. An SQL query that doesn't require an output will cause SQL injection risks. So the popularity is very high.

If you are using a Microsoft SQL server, there are many SQL injection risks. If you are not Microsoft SQL Server, you probably don't have to worry about SQL injection risks. But even though the users don't have to deal with SQL injection risks, the SQL statements they write are still dangerous. These SQL statements can lead to many problems for your website if not taken care of.

If you are using open-source software, then you are susceptible to SQL injection risks. This is because most open source applications for your websites are vulnerable to SQL injections. If you are not using SQL injection risks, you make it very easy for attackers to put their scripts into your websites and do some damage.

If you use a web application where you can create user input into forms, you are at significant risk from SQL injection risks. Because the user enters their information without thinking it through, the attacker can change fields, columns, and many more things in those forms. So if you are not careful and allow the user to input anything they want into the conditions, you will have big problems.

The final thing that we will cover is allowing your web app to be attacked by SQL injection risks. The last thing is that you are not taking advantage of the opportunity to protect yourself. You are leaving the final decision about what database you want to use up to the attacker. They can change the application logic, database, and so much more, but they cannot change the security aspects of your system.

There are several different ways that SQL injection risks can enter your program. One way is that the program you are using opens a connection to an SQL server on the attacker's server. If the server is available and the database is already compromised, then your program can be attacked. However, if you leave it open, you let the attacker into your schedule, allowing them to expose your users' information.

The following way is that the SQL injection attack can occur during a routine on an application. You don't want to wait for an employee to open a report that they shouldn't have before you scan the program for vulnerabilities. This is just too late. You need to scan the application at regular intervals throughout the day to catch these types of attacks. If you wait until an attack happens, it could very well be too late, and you won't be able to stop it.

Another common way is that a site visitor can open a link in a web browser and then enter information that they shouldn't have. Even if the site visitor is not a hacker, they can still open a link in a web browser that they shouldn't have, leading to SQL injection risks. If a site visitor is trying to gain access to your site, you need to consider all of the above before allowing them entry.

[network-security-concepts]

What is a Cyber Security Researcher?

A recent news story reported that a cyber security researcher had lost his job after revealing flaws in a critical computer system used by the U.S. government. The story itself is alarming, but more importantly, it's indicative of the many challenges facing the field of information security. The problem, as usual, is that the public perception of what a cyber security researcher does is at odds with what the field needs. As a result, a common question is what does a cyber security researcher do, and how do they differ from a computer software engineer?

An excellent place to begin answering this question is to understand that a cyber security specialist is in many ways much different than a software engineer. Information security is much more than detecting vulnerabilities in a computer program. The damage done by a flaw can range from being simply disruptive to being malicious, including the theft of company or customer information. At the same time, however, a software engineer merely prevents a potential problem by developing a software program that prevents that problem from occurring in the first place. A cyber security specialist goes a step further, attempting to find the cause of vulnerabilities so that their impact doesn't come about accidentally. This means a great deal more knowledge and skills than a software engineer has, which can be a factor in the field.

For a start, a cyber security specialist might specialize in a specific type of computer science. This may be part of why many jobs in this field exist - the need to bridge the gap between Internet security and conventional security. This kind of specialist might work for a government agency, a private firm, or even a university.

Then, a cyber security specialist might work for a non-governmental agency or a private firm, for example. But it's important to note that some of the best jobs for this field lie outside the traditional security industry. For example, many individuals work at academic institutions trained as cyber security consultants. These people go about educating students about information security - this can include training students in how to get their information protected when they go online.

A final question might be how one gets a job in a cyber security professional field? One answer is to get an IT degree - which can lead to positions like information security consultant or even a cyber security specialist. Information security consultants usually have a few years of experience and can bring in many potential clients because of their experience. Meanwhile, cyber security specialists can be hired straight out of college and usually start out working with small firms.

All in all, is a cyber security professional can be an excellent career for the right person. Cyber security is an ever-changing field, and as technology progresses, so make careers. The best way to find out what is a cyber security specialist is to do your research on the internet - there is plenty of information on the subject. With the right skills and education, you can pursue a job in this field almost anywhere - from small businesses to large corporations - so don't be surprised if you hear about someone starting a new career as a cyber security professional today!