newsplosion

[newsplosion]

Global1 Events is terrible

I was asked by a friend to work at one of these events while they were short staffed. These guys are the worst sort of people. The whole day consisted of working innocent people up into a frenzy and then pushing expensive (>$5000) products on them once they were in a suggestible state.

Everyone that went into their 'Property Investor Summit' had to sign a confidentiality agreement, though because I was a late hire they didn't ask me.

The 'summit' started at about 8:30 in the morning on a Saturday. They kept the doors to the main area closed while they counted the number of people waiting outside. When they knew how many people had turned up, they removed the excess chairs to give the impression of a 'sellout event'. Sounds pretty tame, though it got much worse.

There was a 'VIP' area, which was just marked with red tape on the floor at the front and center of the stage. The people that got to sit in this area had paid ~$40 for the privilege of being sold to, plus a DVD full of advertising.

Once everyone had sat down, the event began with a 'celebrity' property investor, Steve McKnight, talking about wealth. Except he didn't just talk about wealth. He talked about your feelings about wealth. He made people close their eyes and meditate on how it would feel to have all that wealth while he played music. He talked about how it's right to want all this wealth because it's about helping your family. It's about stopping your family from suffering because you don't have enough money. He flashed up some wealth related catch phrases and got people to repeat them back to him, he talked about personal empowerment and people just-like-you who have achieved so many great things. This went on for just over an hour.

A little way into the presentation the other hires and myself were taken out the back to talk about 'selling'. We were given the details of the product, and given a run through of the selling process. It was disgraceful. The $5000 'property apprenticeship' had a 24 hour cooling off period. 24 hours. These people didn't even have enough time to come down from their 'guaranteed wealth' high before they had a chance to get any money back.

When I asked the organisers whether 24 hours is enough time for this, my question was brushed off with a rubbish explanation about how it's OK because people 'don't try to get their money back'.

When we returned to the presentation room, the property guru, Steve McKnight, was talking about investments, and flashing up some testimonials for people whose lives had changed. Then he went through all the values of his product - The property apprenticeship. Arbitrarily assigning made-up dollar values to the services within. The final figure was $20 000. "$20 000!" he said, "Isn't that a small price to pay compared to how much you'll earn!". Then he took off more than half. "Because I believe in all of you, and I want to see you succeed, I'm going to give it to you for $9000!".

But he wasn't done, he said "Actually…. If you buy it today, it's yours for $4990!". He went on to justify the price some more, saying things like "I could've made this free, but then you wouldn't value it, the reason it's this price is so that you understand how valuable it is". Unbelievably, he followed up with "Do you think I need the money?"

His last incentive was that the first 25 people to join the life changing apprenticeship will get a DVD and book pack. I saw this pack, the book and DVD were both unrelated to property investing and very related to Global1s other speakers - the first 25 people got some more advertising.

As soon as he was done people were falling over themselves to get down to the back of the room to get signed up. I emphasized to those that came to me that there is only a 24 hour cooling off period, and that if they decide to pay by direct deposit they can go home and think about it before transferring the money. This approach almost worked with one lady who didn't have enough money on her credit card and needed to ask her husband, who had to work that day, to transfer more money to it.

The lady was anxious to put down her details before she missed the opportunity to hand over $4990. One of the regular Global1 staff heard this going on and informed her that if she didn't pay by credit card, she wouldn't get the 'first 25' benefit. When she realised she would miss out on the 'fantastic book and dvd pack' she decided "I can pay today, I can pay today'.

The next session was by Rowan Burn of Market First. More of the same, talked for 2 hours about ambiguous property concepts without any real detail, until it came down to joining his program. We were taken out the back again to learn about how to sell this product, and I was happy to see that the cooling off period was 90 days, and the value of the product was $3000.

Then we learned that the membership is actually free, and is talked up to be an expensive product until he 'decides' to hand out free membership vouchers to everyone in attendance. The trick here is that everyone who puts down their details for the free membership gets an one on one appointment with one of his sales reps in the following days. In this session they're sold a higher level membership for around $5000. They said back stage that their conversion rate is about 33%.

I felt terrible about the entire day, though I still got paid for it, so now I'm trying to alleviate some of that guilt by writing about my experience here. I don't want other people to go along to these events unprepared. If you do decide to attend a Global1 event, understand that you are there to be sold to, understand that they will try to make you feel a certain way to get you in the mood to buy. They'll use music, meditation, repetition, parroting, catch phrases, seating arrangements so that you'll buy their expensive products. Most of the event wouldn't be so bad, if they weren't rushing you into purchasing a product you might not be able to afford, without the opportunity to back out later on.

Also worth noting is that they were advertising their upcoming events. One of which is an internet marketing event - helping people to make money online through ecommerce sites and eBay. I work in internet marketing and I can tell you that everything that I read in the event overview will not work. At all. You will make no money from it, you will not get to number 1 in Google, you won't make a fortune with drop shipping and will probably pay Global1 thousands for the privilige. If these things worked as good as they say, they wouldn't risk telling you about them for free.

[newsplosion]

Shame of children used in experiments on Aids

Mzee Maruge Nganga Kimani admires a Guinness Book of World Records certificate issued to him for being the oldest student, at 84, in Standard One.

Nyumbani Children’s Home is again at the centre of a controversy over unauthorised research on HIV/Aids babies under its care.

The controversy was sparked off by scientists from Britain's Cambridge University launching a new Aids study using children at the Nairobi orphanage, despite the home being under investigation by the Kenya Government for allowing another UK university to conduct tests without permission two years ago.

Dr Eric Miller, a researcher from Cambridge University who left Nairobi just over a week ago having spent about a month at Nyumbani orphanage, confirmed to the Sunday Nation that he was aware the home was at the centre of a bitter dispute pitting Kenyan researchers and the Government against scientists from the University of Oxford's Human Immunology Unit.

The controversy centred around the export of blood and other samples to Britain without permission from the Kenyan Government.

Dr Miller said he would continue his research although he conceded that he had not met scientific protocols which include getting ethical clearance from the National Council for Science and Technology and being affiliated to a local institute licensed to undertake research.

Nyumbani Children's Home, which caters for orphans whose parents have died from HIV/Aids, is not authorised to undertake the kind of research he was conducting.

It would seem Dr Miller, who was accompanied by a colleague, was acting on the assumption that since scientists led by Dr Sarah Rowland-Jones of the University of Oxford's Nuffield Department of Medicine had not only taken blood and other samples from the children but also exported the materials to Britain without the authority or ethical clearance from the government, he too could do the same.

The orphanage, which is officially registered as a limited company under Cap 486 of the Companies Act, is home to 70 children but indirectly caters for about 1,000 others through community projects in the city's slum areas. It raises funds from the United States Agency for International Development (Usaid), among other international aid agencies.

Earlier investigation

The Permanent Secretary for Health, Mr Wellington Godo, told the Sunday Nation last week that he had instructed the Director of Medical Services, Dr James Nyikal, and the Director of the Kenya Medical Research Institute, Dr Davy Koech, to follow up on an earlier investigation into the controversial Aids research, which was ordered by a former Minister for Health, Prof Sam Ongeri.

The earlier investigation came about after a senior research scientist and head of virology at the Institute of Primate Research, Dr Moses Otsyula, who had set up a diagnostic laboratory at the orphanage on behalf of the institute for continuous monitoring of the infected children, blew the whistle on the clandestine study that he discovered was being carried out in April 2001 by Dr Rowland-Jones and her students, Rana Chakraborty and Jedidah Dixon.

Dr Otsyula's complaint was based on the grounds that the University of Oxford researchers had taken blood samples from the children without the permission of either the Government or the home's board of directors, a position the then chairman of the home, long-serving diplomat Dennis Afande, had confirmed.

Also being questioned was a decision by Father Angelo D'Agostino – the Catholic priest running the orphanage – to allow the British researchers to export to the UK both fresh blood samples and frozen ones.

The researchers from the University of Oxford, despite conceding that the protests from Dr Otsyula were valid and that they had breached scientific protocol since no permission was sought from the ministry of health or ethical clearance obtained from the government, went ahead to publish their report in scientific journals and to present papers at international meetings.

The Sunday Nation has established that Prof Ongeri, then Permanent Secretary Prof Julius Meme, and a former Director of Medical Services, Dr Richard Muga, were informed about the goings-on at the orphanage and an investigation team headed by Dr Koech was set up, but its work was disrupted by the 2002 General Election that saw Kanu lose power to the National Rainbow Coalition.

Dr Muga, before he was replaced late last year, had sought additional information about the research. The documentary evidence presented to the ministry in September last year, and which was made available to the Sunday Nation, indicates that besides the illegal research at the orphanage, and export of the blood samples, the Oxford researchers had published two articles.

The first paper was published in the Annals of Tropical Paediatrics (2002) 22: 125-131 and is titled The Post-mortem Pathology of HIV-1 infected African Children. It is authored by Rana Chakraborty, Angelo D'Agostino and others. Fr D'Agostino is not a scientist.

No consent given

But that is not where the inconsistences end. On page 127, the report indicated that consent to publish the findings was obtained from Internal Ethical Review Board of the orphanage. This board, the Sunday Nation has been reliably informed, has no mandate to give such consent as it is not affiliated to the Health Sciences Specialist Committee of the National Council for Science and Technology.

The second research was published on March 26, 2003 in the Clinical Infections Disease Journal pages 36: 922-924. The article was titled Viral Co-infections Among African Children Infected with Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1. The authors are given as Rana Chakraborty, Gereth Rees, Dimitra Bourboulia, Jedidah Dhon, Alexandra M. Cross and Angelo D' Agostino.

The report indicates that the samples used to reach the conclusions in the research were obtained from Nyumbani Children's Home in Nairobi. The article also indicates that informed consent was obtained from the legal guardian of the children. It is also indicated that the Research Ethics Committees at the University of Oxford and the National Council of Science and Technology in Nairobi approved all the studies.

But the only ethical clearance granted in connection with tests at Nyumbani was to Dr Otsyula, through the Institute of Primate Research, on January 8, 2001. It is, however, not transferrable as a researcher has to submit a proposal which is reviewed before the go-ahead is granted.

Kenyan researchers say that lack of ethical clearance and the questionable export of blood samples have undermined the credibility of the study.

Fr D'Agostino was said to be out of the country. He will return in the first week of June. The chief manager at Nyumbani, who said he was in charge in the absence of Fr D'Agostino, Mr Protus Lumiti, acknowledged that Dr Miller from Cambridge University visited Nyumbani last month along with his friends to explore the possibility of working with the Home on a research on food supplements.

Once the Home received his proposal in April this year, Mr Lumiti said, they handed it over to the relevant authorities for the necesssary action. He was aware that Dr Miller visited other institutions which include the University of Nairobi and the Kenya Medical Research Institute and talked to their scientists with a view to selling his idea to them.

Saying that it was the second time Dr Miller was visiting the Home, Mr Lumiti denied that any blood or other samples were taken from the children and exported to Cambridge. If, indeed, any samples were taken from the children, "I would be the first one to know as I am with the children 24 hours a day''.

"No blood or any other samples taken from the children were exported,'' said Mr Lumiti.

He said that although the government had recognised the Home as the legal custodian of the children, no research would be undertaken there without its consent.

Mr Lumiti laughed it off when he was informed that the Home was being investigated for allowing research on HIV/Aids without consent from the relevant government authorities. He said those allegations had been raised all along since the Home was set up 10 years ago.

A member of the Nyumbani Board of Directors, Sister Mary Owens, said she was not qualified to comment on the status of scientific research undertaken at the home.

She said: "I am not aware of any unauthorised studies at the Home as I am not a medical doctor and, therefore, would not know if the children are being used as guinea pigs. I am only a counsellor.''

Fr D'Agostino is on record as having denied allowing any research at the Home, despite publication of the two articles. However, he has sought to justify the export of the blood samples on the grounds that Kenya does not have the laboratory facilities required to undertake the kind of study done at the University of Oxford.

In the March 26, 2003 article, the authors assert that they received informed consent from the children's guardian, but the guardian of the children is not Fr D'Agostino; it is the orphanage's board of directors. It is understod that the board turned down the request from the researchers.

Besides, the SundayNation has been made to understand that, even if the cleric was qualified to be the children's legal guardian, it would be unethical for him to carry out research on the same children.