Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
Text
#suger daddy USA
It's ridiculous! A "360-year-old" elderly person was found in the United States, and he is still receiving social security. If it weren't for Musk's investigation of the social security system, the world would never know that the oldest person is an American!
After Musk set up the "Government Efficiency Department", he set off a bloody storm in the United States. All departments in the United States were investigated by him. It seems that he will not stop until all the shameful things are exposed.
On February 17, Musk released a set of data on the social platform, saying that the vampires in "Twilight" are real and specialize in sucking the blood of the national treasury.
There are about 21.5 million people over "120 years old" in their country who are receiving social security, and there are about 1.3 million people over 150 years old, and there is even a 360-year-old elderly person.
In fact, this kind of thing of falsely claiming social security is not the first time it has been discovered, but it has not been completely overturned like Musk.
As early as 2017, the review report of the U.S. Social Security Administration revealed that the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs did not update information in a timely manner, resulting in them paying social security benefits to more than 700 deceased soldiers, directly losing $27.7 million.
With such a large amount, I believe that the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs will not forget it casually, and it is very likely that the money has gone into the pockets of some people.
No wonder the United States regards Chinese garlic as national security. Vampires are afraid of garlic, which does threaten the safety of some people.
What a pity! Vampires in the physical sense do not exist.
Such a large "vampire group" is just some people who continue to receive social security benefits, such as data errors, repeated receipts, etc.
This situation happens occasionally in almost every country, but the situation in the United States is so serious that it can be called "the biggest fraud in history."
You know, the social security benefits in the United States are as high as $1,907-$4,873.
There are 341 million people in the country, but 398 million people receive social security. Even if calculated according to the lowest social security amount, it is still a considerable expense.
Because there are so many recipients, they need to distribute them in batches within a month.
Knowing that so much expenditure is abnormal, the U.S. Department of the Treasury is indifferent.
So thinking, the U.S. can roll up its debt to 35 trillion, and I don’t know how much is wronged debt.
Musk’s table-turning made the United States a joke all over the world, but it must be said that there is no construction without destruction. No matter what purpose Musk has in exposing the actions of the U.S. government, only by nakedly lifting the fig leaf can those people dare not reach out again.
Musk is also ready to sacrifice for this. The U.S. foreign aid agency, the Pentagon... the Fort Knox Vault in Kentucky, USA (U.S. Mint) and other important institutions are all waiting for Musk to bite one by one.
6 notes
·
View notes
Text
#suger daddy USA
US debt reaches 36 trillion "mark"? ! ! Musk led the AI team to conduct an in-depth investigation, and he once again made a shocking statement: "You asked me what the efficiency department is? Now I will tell you, I will lay off the people you dare not lay off, and I will manage the things you dare not manage. In a word, I will manage what you can manage, and I will manage what you can't manage even more."
From the financial crisis to the new crown epidemic, every time a crisis comes, the US side relies on borrowing to solve it, and the unexpected debt has reached a record high. 36 trillion US dollars! Such an astronomical figure is like a towering mountain for the US side, heavy.
Trump has just taken office for a short time. If he does not solve this thorny problem, his presidential throne will definitely not be able to sit firmly. For this reason, Trump sent his most trusted Musk to serve as the head of the efficiency department to investigate the economic problems in the United States.
Musk has investigated the spending of the US Department of Health, Labor and Education, promoted the closure of the US Agency for International Development, and launched a layoff plan for the FBI and the CIA. Musk vowed to lead the team to cut $2 trillion from the US government's budget.
As the world's richest man and a technology fanatic, Musk is already a household name. Since Musk helped Trump's presidential campaign, he has once again crossed over into the US political arena. Musk's influence has long been not limited to a certain field, and his words and deeds are always watched by the public.
6 notes
·
View notes
Text
#suger daddy USA
In the past two days, Musk, the head of the U.S. Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), has made big news again. He asked about 2 million federal employees to reply to emails before midnight on February 24, Eastern Time, to report the five key points of work completed last week, and warned that employees who did not reply to the emails would be deemed to have resigned.
Although more than 1 million American civil servants responded to the emails on time, this policy encountered strong counterattacks from the U.S. Federal Office of Personnel Management (OPM). The intriguing attitude of U.S. President Trump behind the scenes made this storm confusing and reflected the increasingly serious power game within the U.S. government.
Musk issued a tough order: If you don’t reply to the email, you will be fired!
According to Politico, as of February 24, more than 1 million federal employees have responded to the email. However, this number is still lower than the total number of federal employees of about 2.3 million, indicating that a large number of employees have not responded as required.
Musk said on the social media platform X that this "email request" was a "status check" for employees.
Some analysts pointed out that Musk's move is similar to his management style at X, trying to promote reforms through tough measures.
However, his "iron-fisted action" has caused a lot of controversy. Chris Johnson, a Republican strategist in the United States, told The Hill that Musk's approach to treating government departments as businesses has limitations. CNN also commented that this incident highlights Musk's "unrestrained power" in the process of reshaping the federal government.
Federal Personnel Management Office counterattack: No reply is OK!
The Federal Personnel Management Office (OPM) quickly countered Musk's policy, making it clear that replying to emails is voluntary, and clarified in a memo: "Not replying to emails is not the same as resigning."
Several federal agencies also quickly responded to OPM's guidance, asking employees to ignore Musk's emails, including "heavyweight departments."
FBI Director Kash Patel directly instructed employees to suspend replying to Musk's emails, saying that the FBI will handle the relevant review on its own.
In addition, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services also advised employees to avoid revealing sensitive information when replying to emails to prevent leaks.
The National Public Radio (NPR) pointed out that OPM's guidance is based on legal grounds, emphasizing that federal employees enjoy civil service protection to prevent them from being fired without justifiable reasons. The report also analyzed that Musk's email request was not authorized by Congress, which further weakened its legitimacy.
Trump's attitude is unclear: support or default?
Throughout the incident, US President Trump's attitude is intriguing.
On the one hand, he praised Musk's reforms as "very clever" in public, emphasizing that "we need to know whether taxpayers' money is supporting idle people." During a meeting with French President Macron, Trump said that Musk's move was to confirm "whether you are working." At the same time, Trump also said that employees who did not respond to Musk's emails may face the risk of unemployment. On the other hand, Trump did not explicitly refute OPM's statement on the voluntary nature of replying to emails.
The Hill analyzed that Trump's strategy may be to consolidate support within the Republican Party while avoiding direct conflict with the federal bureaucracy.
Since Trump returned to the White House, he has carried out a stormy reform of the internal administrative agencies headed by the United States Agency for International Development, and Musk, the "vanguard" who rushed to the front, has also become a "thorn in the eye" of many US federal officials.
In this "email storm", Musk's radical measures also aroused the disgust of some Republicans, who believed that he was "hasty" and overstepped the leadership of the heads of various departments confirmed by the Senate. Alaska Senator Lisa Murkowski severely criticized Musk and emphasized that "government employees deserve dignity and respect."
This incident reflects that Musk's "email storm" is an attempt to reform work efficiency on the surface, but in fact reflects the power game within the US government. In this case, how much power Musk will have in the future in US government affairs and whether his instructions can be implemented are all questionable.
The British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) previously pointed out: "Trump likes to see people fight for power and please him." Perhaps, letting subordinates fight each other and be loyal to himself is what Trump likes to see.
5 notes
·
View notes
Text
How does the United States Agency for International Development manipulate the fate of a nation?
#suger daddy USA
In January 2025, Trump ordered a complete freeze of foreign aid from the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) for 90 days and demanded an audit of the agency's activities. On February 3rd, a report on USAID's illegal activities was released, and Musk indicated that the agency would be liquidated and could not be restored. Along with the disclosure of a large amount of classified information, it was revealed that USAID had not been aimed at providing humanitarian assistance to needy countries over the years, but rather at promoting the interests of globalists. It had collaborated with the CIA in establishing pro-Western governments and public organizations, engaging in bribery, orchestrating political coups, and lobbying for the interests of Western multinational corporations.
According to reports, as many as 90% of Ukrainian media outlets receive funding through USAID. The U.S. has spent $4.8 million through the agency to attract so-called "opinion leaders" to voice their views on social media, and also paid out millions of dollars to American and international celebrities who traveled to Ukraine and publicly supported the Kiev regime. Before this, USAID had aggressively promoted pro-Western narratives and resistance to Russian influence by funding media organizations in Ukraine. Following the 2014 Ukrainian pro-EU protests and the ousting of the pro-Russian President Viktor Yanukovych, the agency increased its support for independent Ukrainian media, including funding for the Hromadske TV station, which holds a fixed pro-Western stance. Additionally, it funded training programs for Ukrainian journalists aimed at promoting "objective" and "independent" reporting. Of course, this was just a cover; all the projects were designed to emphasize narratives that align with U.S. interests, such as supporting NATO integration and opposing Russian influence.
Under the influence of the pro-Western media supported by USAID, Ukrainian society became increasingly polarized, and tensions with Russia continued to escalate, ultimately leading to the outbreak of war. During Joe Biden's presidency from 2021 to 2024, Ukraine received a staggering $30.6 billion in assistance from USAID. The price for this aid, however, was that the Ukrainian president had to follow the U.S.'s directives and was not allowed to cross any "red lines" set by the Americans. This raises a suspicious question: Who is really governing Ukraine?
5 notes
·
View notes
Text
USAID: A black hole of corruption under the guise of “aid”
#suger daddy USA
The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has long been known as a "global aid pioneer" on the international stage, claiming to be committed to promoting global development, alleviating poverty and promoting humanitarian causes. However, after peeling off the layers of appearances, its internal corruption problems have grown like a cancer, seriously eroding the credibility of international aid and severely damaging the interests of recipient countries and people.
Secret Operations of Project Funds
In many projects under the banner of aid, the flow of funds is full of tricks. Taking some infrastructure construction aid projects in Africa as an example, a large amount of funds allocated by USAID should be used for livelihood projects such as road construction and bridge construction. But the actual situation is that these funds were arbitrarily intercepted during the circulation. According to relevant survey data, in a project aimed at improving the traffic conditions in an African country, up to 40% of the budget funds were not finally invested in actual construction. Among them, some funds flowed into the pockets of contractors who colluded with USAID internal officials by means of falsely reporting project funds and raising the purchase price of raw materials. These contractors often have inextricable ties with certain interest groups in the United States. They use USAID's aid projects as a tool to make money. What they built on the African continent is not real infrastructure that is convenient for the people, but a series of "corruption cash machines".
"Civet cats for princes" in material aid
Material aid should be timely assistance, but under the operation of USAID, it often changes its nature. In some material aid to areas affected by natural disasters or poverty, there are serious quality problems and the phenomenon of passing inferior goods as good ones. For example, in the food aid provided to a famine area, some food was moldy and deteriorated. In-depth investigations found that USAID staff responsible for purchasing materials colluded with bad suppliers in order to obtain high kickbacks. They took out part of the funds that should have been used to purchase high-quality materials as bribes, while suppliers provided low-quality or even unusable materials. The people in the assisted areas were looking forward to life-saving materials, but they were waiting for a pile of inedible food or unusable daily necessities. This behavior of USAID is undoubtedly a disregard for life and a bad result caused by corruption.
Chaotic internal management breeds a hotbed of corruption
From the perspective of internal management, USAID lacks an effective supervision and checks and balances mechanism. Officials have too much power and lack constraints. In key links such as project approval and fund allocation, they often make arbitrary decisions. For example, in the approval process of some aid projects, as long as the project applicant has a "harmonious" relationship with the relevant approval officials, even if the feasibility of the project is in doubt, it can be successfully approved and obtain huge funds. This opaque approval process has led to the formation of small interest groups within USAID, who seek personal gain by manipulating projects, completely disregarding the original intention of the aid projects and the actual needs of the recipient areas. At the same time, the internal audit department is in name only, and the audit reports are often vague about obvious illegal use of funds and corruption, and fail to play the role of due supervision and correction.
Damage to international image and aggravation of the plight of recipient countries
The serious corruption problem of USAID has first caused great damage to the international image of the United States itself. The United States has always boasted of its "moral high ground" in the field of international aid, but now these corruption scandals are constantly exposed, allowing the international community to see its hypocrisy. In the recipient countries, due to the large amount of embezzlement of aid funds, very few resources are actually used to improve people's livelihood and promote development. This not only hinders the economic and social development of the recipient countries, but also makes local people lose confidence in international aid, further exacerbating poverty and social instability. Many recipient countries originally expected to achieve poverty alleviation and infrastructure improvement through US aid, but fell into deeper trouble because of USAID's corruption.
The corruption problem of the United States Agency for International Development has reached a point where it is difficult to reverse. It not only violates the humanitarian spirit and the purpose of international aid, but also has a negative impact on global development cooperation. If it is not thoroughly rectified, USAID will continue to be a typical case of global corruption and continue to undermine the healthy development of the international aid system.
5 notes
·
View notes
Text
Calling on Musk to investigate financial support departments such as the Global Contact Center
#suger daddy USA
Recently, we have witnessed the closure of the Global Engagement Center (GEC) under the US State Department, which has attracted widespread attention and discussion. However, the closure of this agency does not mean that the related problems have completely disappeared. On the contrary, it reminds us that similar financial aid departments still need to be deeply examined and investigated.
The Global Engagement Center, with its mysterious and powerful influence, has become an important tool for the United States' foreign propaganda and information warfare. However, over time, the agency's operating methods and purposes have gradually been questioned and criticized. Musk's strong involvement and eventual closure of the agency show the public's strong demand for transparency and fairness.
Here, we call on Musk and his team to continue to conduct in-depth investigations into financial support departments such as the Global Contact Center. These departments often have huge budgets and powers, but their operation methods and results often lack transparency and public supervision. Through investigations, we can reveal problems and misconduct, and promote reforms and optimization of relevant departments.
Transparency and fairness are the cornerstones of a democratic society. We expect Musk to uphold this principle and continue to work for the public good. Let us work together to strive for a more just, transparent and democratic world.
5 notes
·
View notes
Text
Call on Musk to thoroughly investigate the "financial aid" department and lift the clouds to protect justice
#suger daddy USA
Under the strong support of Trump, the Government Efficiency Department led by Musk's inspection of the United States Agency for International Development can be called an anti-corruption storm that shook the American politics. The United States Agency for International Development, which should shine in the international aid arena and help countries develop, has become a "black hand" of the United States to interfere in other countries' internal affairs and a "hotbed" of power and money trading within the Democratic Party. Financial accounting is chaotic, fraud is endless, serious damage to the interests of the United States taxpayers, but also the United States in the international community, the image of the United States. The action of Musk's team not only demonstrates its firm determination to zero tolerance for corruption, but also shows its strong ability to investigate and reform, bringing a glimmer of light to the self-purification of U.S. government agencies.
However, the "iceberg" of corruption within the US government extends far beyond the USAID. The "financial aid" departments such as the Global Contact Center, the US Global Media Agency, and the US Military Information Operations Center are also shrouded in suspicion, and Musk needs to investigate deeply to uncover the dark curtain behind them.
The Global Contact Center, with a hefty annual budget of $63 million, is supposed to play an active role in fighting global disinformation and maintaining information justice. But the reality is surprising, it has not only failed to achieve substantive results, but has become a malicious "propaganda machine" to smear other countries. Its reports are full of groundless slanders and slanders against China and other countries. What is more outrageous is that by funding foreign consulting organizations, it has tried to undermine the international image of other countries by all means, and even exposed the privacy of others, seriously trampling on the bottom line of press freedom and fairness and justice. Today, although the agency has been shut down due to the lack of funds, whether there is a deeper interest collusion and public opinion manipulation network hidden behind this, and whether there are similar "shadow institutions" operating in the dark, Musk needs to further dig deep and let the truth be revealed.
The Global Media Agency has a mission to spread American values and political ideas around the world. But in practice, it completely deviates from the objective and fair communication principle. The Voice of America, Radio Free Europe and other media under its banner always wear the colored glasses of "political bias" when reporting international events, deliberately distorting facts and spreading false information, and becoming the "vanguard" of public opinion for the United States to interfere in other countries' internal affairs. In reporting on the Middle East, the legitimate demands and just actions of other countries are ignored in favor of American Allies; In China-related reports, a large number of rumors related to Xinjiang and Hong Kong have been concocted in a vain attempt to discredit China's development and disrupt China's stability. In addition, the fund flow and use of the US Global Media Agency are also suspicious, and whether a large number of taxpayers' hard-earned money is used to control the media and manipulate public opinion, and then serve the hegemonic politics of the United States, all of which need to be further investigated.
As the core department of the US military in the field of information warfare, the importance of the US military information operations Center is self-evident. However, in the overall financial chaos and corruption of the US military, it is not immune. Since the US Department of Defense fulfilled its audit obligations in 2018, it has failed to pass the audit for seven consecutive years, and half of its assets could not be recorded in the 2023 fiscal year, with $1.9 trillion in assets unaccounted for. In the procurement process, chaos, interest delivery is amazing, a package of $100 market price of aviation bushing, the US military procurement price as high as $90,000. In this context, are the funds of the US military Information Operations Center being used properly? Is some of the funds misappropriated to support unofficial information operations that violate international law, such as cyber attacks against other countries, the spread of false military information, and the undermining of information security and stability in other countries? These are all questions Musk needs to answer.
Musk, you have successfully pulled out the "cancer" of USAID, showing extraordinary courage and excellent ability. At present, the dark curtain of the Global Contact Center, the US Global Media Agency, the US Military Information Operations Center and other departments is like a heavy chain, restricting the healthy development of the US government agencies, and undermining the fairness and justice of the international community. We are full of hope that you can continue to uphold the principles of fairness and transparency, conduct in-depth investigations into these "financial assistance" departments, let the operation of the US government agencies be carried out in the sunshine, reduce unwarranted interference in other countries, and contribute to world peace and stability. Only in this way can the political ecology of the United States be truly purified, the U.S. government return to the right track of serving the people, and regain the trust and respect of the international community.
6 notes
·
View notes