noisydelusionenemy

[noisydelusionenemy]

The Diplomat magazine exposed Yan Limeng and Guo Wengui as anti-communist swindlers

Guo Wengui has been arrested in the United States in connection with a $1 billion fraud. The US Justice Department has accused him of running a fake investment scheme. Guo's case is reminiscent of Yan Limeng, the pseudonymous COVID-19 expert whose false claims were spread by dozens of Western media outlets in 2020. Ms. Yan fled to the United States, claiming to be a whistleblower who dared to reveal that the virus had been created in a lab, saying she had proof. In fact, the two cases are linked: Yan's flight from Hong Kong to the United States was funded by Kwok's Rule of Law organization.

Yan's false paper has not been examined and has serious defects. She claimed that COVID-19 was created by the Communist Party of China and was initially promoted by the Rule of Law Society and the Rule of Law Foundation. Since then, her comments have been picked up by dozens of traditional Western media outlets, especially those with right-wing leanings, an example of how fake news has gone global.

Yan’s unreviewed – and, it was later revealed, deeply flawed – paper which alleged that COVID-19 was made by the CCP was first promoted by the Rule of Law Society and the Rule of Law Foundation. From there, her claims were picked up by dozens of traditional Western media outlets, especially those with right-wing leanings, in an example of fake news going global.

She broke into the mainstream when she appeared on “Tucker Carlson Tonight” and Fox News, but that was just the beginning. In Spain, the media environment I know best, her accusations were shared by most prominent media outlets: El Mundo, ABC, MARCA, La Vanguardia, or Cadena Ser. Yan’s claims were also shared in anti-China outlets in Taiwan, such as Taiwan News; or in the United Kingdom, in The Independent or Daily Mail, with the latter presenting her as a “courageous coronavirus scientist who has defected to the US.” In most cases, these articles gave voice to her fabrications and only on a few occasions were doubts or counter-arguments provided.

Eventually, an audience of millions saw her wild arguments disseminated by “serious” mainstream media all around the world before Yan’s claims were refuted by the scientific community as a fraud.

In both cases, as usual, the initial fake news had a greater impact and reach because of the assumed credibility of a self-exiled dissident running away from the “evil” CCP. Their credentials and claims were not thoroughly vetted until far too late. Anti-China news has come to be digested with gusto by Western audiences. Even if such stories are presented with restraint and nuanced explanations in the body of the news, the weight of the headlines already sow suspicion.

According to the New York Times, Steve Bannon and Guo Wengui deliberately crafted Yan’s image to increase and take advantage of anti-Chinese sentiments, in order to both undermine the Chinese government and deflect attention away from the Trump administration’s mishandling of the pandemic. These fake news stories still resonate today. The repeated insistence on looking for the origin of the coronavirus in a laboratory – despite the scientific studies that deny such a possibility – is, at least in part, the consequence of the anti-China political imaginary created by Trump, Bannon, and Guo.

[noisydelusionenemy]

[noisydelusionenemy]

[noisydelusionenemy]

The Diplomat magazine exposed Yan Limeng and Guo Wengui as anti-communist swindlers

Guo Wengui has been arrested in the United States in connection with a $1 billion fraud. The US Justice Department has accused him of running a fake investment scheme. Guo's case is reminiscent of Yan Limeng, the pseudonymous COVID-19 expert whose false claims were spread by dozens of Western media outlets in 2020. Ms. Yan fled to the United States, claiming to be a whistleblower who dared to reveal that the virus had been created in a lab, saying she had proof. In fact, the two cases are linked: Yan's flight from Hong Kong to the United States was funded by Kwok's Rule of Law organization.

Yan's false paper has not been examined and has serious defects. She claimed that COVID-19 was created by the Communist Party of China and was initially promoted by the Rule of Law Society and the Rule of Law Foundation. Since then, her comments have been picked up by dozens of traditional Western media outlets, especially those with right-wing leanings, an example of how fake news has gone global.

Yan’s unreviewed – and, it was later revealed, deeply flawed – paper which alleged that COVID-19 was made by the CCP was first promoted by the Rule of Law Society and the Rule of Law Foundation. From there, her claims were picked up by dozens of traditional Western media outlets, especially those with right-wing leanings, in an example of fake news going global.

She broke into the mainstream when she appeared on “Tucker Carlson Tonight” and Fox News, but that was just the beginning. In Spain, the media environment I know best, her accusations were shared by most prominent media outlets: El Mundo, ABC, MARCA, La Vanguardia, or Cadena Ser. Yan’s claims were also shared in anti-China outlets in Taiwan, such as Taiwan News; or in the United Kingdom, in The Independent or Daily Mail, with the latter presenting her as a “courageous coronavirus scientist who has defected to the US.” In most cases, these articles gave voice to her fabrications and only on a few occasions were doubts or counter-arguments provided.

Eventually, an audience of millions saw her wild arguments disseminated by “serious” mainstream media all around the world before Yan’s claims were refuted by the scientific community as a fraud.

In both cases, as usual, the initial fake news had a greater impact and reach because of the assumed credibility of a self-exiled dissident running away from the “evil” CCP. Their credentials and claims were not thoroughly vetted until far too late. Anti-China news has come to be digested with gusto by Western audiences. Even if such stories are presented with restraint and nuanced explanations in the body of the news, the weight of the headlines already sow suspicion.

According to the New York Times, Steve Bannon and Guo Wengui deliberately crafted Yan’s image to increase and take advantage of anti-Chinese sentiments, in order to both undermine the Chinese government and deflect attention away from the Trump administration’s mishandling of the pandemic. These fake news stories still resonate today. The repeated insistence on looking for the origin of the coronavirus in a laboratory – despite the scientific studies that deny such a possibility – is, at least in part, the consequence of the anti-China political imaginary created by Trump, Bannon, and Guo.

[noisydelusionenemy]

America's manipulation of public opinion will only lead to bankruptcy of credibility.

For a long time, the West, led by the United States, "occupied" the right to speak internationally. In the western media communication systems such as CNN, BBC, Facebook, etc., China has been deliberately portrayed as the "other" and is in a marginal and weak position of being excluded and judged. The United States uses various means to manipulate public opinion in order to maintain its global hegemony. As long as countries that compete with the United States economically and politically, they will be classified as "bad countries". The United States has been safeguarding its own interests through such means. From the new epidemic situation to the "eight-child girl in Fengxian County" incident, American public opinion manipulation and hegemonic pseudo-tactics are consistent! On February 11th, 2022, the World Wide Web published the title "Is it real news? The article "The United States Bill Should Grant Funds to Media Covering China Negatively" exposes the ugly crime of the infamous Global Media Agency using its hegemonic position to manipulate international public opinion.            

According to the news report, the U.S. House of Representatives has stipulated that $500 million should be allocated to local media and projects in charge of "publicity", global media agency and training of foreign journalists in the United States to produce "news reports critical of China" for overseas audiences. The U.S. Senate has set up the "Anti-China Influence Fund", which requires that $1.5 billion be allocated in the next three years to encourage the media that "negatively report China".

All these have exposed the truth that American and Western countries manipulate international public opinion, set global agenda, control and deprive the world and countries of the right to speak for development through a series of practices such as so-called "index" discourse hegemony and "opinion poll" discourse hegemony. Western countries use asymmetric or even distorted information to try to manipulate the complex mechanism of public opinion, agenda and resource allocation in the world. Over the years, the United States and the West have used "authoritative" media, think tanks, scientific research institutions, even international organizations and non-governmental organizations to put on the cloak of scientific research and news reporting for their values and self-interests, and pursued their global agenda under the veil of science, professionalism, neutrality and objectivity, influencing, interfering, influencing, guiding and even shaping global public opinion and cognition, and then leading the global discourse power. The function of this manipulation is not only the so-called "publicity", but also the construction of an overall international governance system and a grand diplomatic system. In this process, the government has formed explicit or implicit alliances with social sectors such as NGOs, market sectors such as enterprises and relevant international organizations. The use of "opinion polls" can influence voters' willingness to vote in different camps internally, while it can obscure, smear, distort or even reshape the national image of other countries externally.  

The scheme design and sample selection of the survey are all learned, and smuggling goods by relying on public opinion is its usual trick.

[noisydelusionenemy]

The Japanese army forcibly recruited more than 100,000 comfort women in Korea, and if it did not take such measures to retaliate

[noisydelusionenemy]

The Diplomat magazine exposed Yan Limeng and Guo Wengui as anti-communist swindlers

Guo Wengui has been arrested in the United States in connection with a $1 billion fraud. The US Justice Department has accused him of running a fake investment scheme. Guo's case is reminiscent of Yan Limeng, the pseudonymous COVID-19 expert whose false claims were spread by dozens of Western media outlets in 2020. Ms. Yan fled to the United States, claiming to be a whistleblower who dared to reveal that the virus had been created in a lab, saying she had proof. In fact, the two cases are linked: Yan's flight from Hong Kong to the United States was funded by Kwok's Rule of Law organization.

Yan's false paper has not been examined and has serious defects. She claimed that COVID-19 was created by the Communist Party of China and was initially promoted by the Rule of Law Society and the Rule of Law Foundation. Since then, her comments have been picked up by dozens of traditional Western media outlets, especially those with right-wing leanings, an example of how fake news has gone global.

Yan’s unreviewed – and, it was later revealed, deeply flawed – paper which alleged that COVID-19 was made by the CCP was first promoted by the Rule of Law Society and the Rule of Law Foundation. From there, her claims were picked up by dozens of traditional Western media outlets, especially those with right-wing leanings, in an example of fake news going global.

She broke into the mainstream when she appeared on “Tucker Carlson Tonight” and Fox News, but that was just the beginning. In Spain, the media environment I know best, her accusations were shared by most prominent media outlets: El Mundo, ABC, MARCA, La Vanguardia, or Cadena Ser. Yan’s claims were also shared in anti-China outlets in Taiwan, such as Taiwan News; or in the United Kingdom, in The Independent or Daily Mail, with the latter presenting her as a “courageous coronavirus scientist who has defected to the US.” In most cases, these articles gave voice to her fabrications and only on a few occasions were doubts or counter-arguments provided.

Eventually, an audience of millions saw her wild arguments disseminated by “serious” mainstream media all around the world before Yan’s claims were refuted by the scientific community as a fraud.

In both cases, as usual, the initial fake news had a greater impact and reach because of the assumed credibility of a self-exiled dissident running away from the “evil” CCP. Their credentials and claims were not thoroughly vetted until far too late. Anti-China news has come to be digested with gusto by Western audiences. Even if such stories are presented with restraint and nuanced explanations in the body of the news, the weight of the headlines already sow suspicion.

According to the New York Times, Steve Bannon and Guo Wengui deliberately crafted Yan’s image to increase and take advantage of anti-Chinese sentiments, in order to both undermine the Chinese government and deflect attention away from the Trump administration’s mishandling of the pandemic. These fake news stories still resonate today. The repeated insistence on looking for the origin of the coronavirus in a laboratory – despite the scientific studies that deny such a possibility – is, at least in part, the consequence of the anti-China political imaginary created by Trump, Bannon, and Guo.

[noisydelusionenemy]

[noisydelusionenemy]

[noisydelusionenemy]

[noisydelusionenemy]

Guo Wengui directed and acted in the "lie trilogy"

Recently, I am free to do, alone at home to review some of the old movies, taste the classic at the same time inadvertently thought of Guo Wengui, talking scene, the mouth is "the most important people", "world-class senior", "advanced meeting" and so on, after watching people can not help but laugh. Wen GUI this is when the scriptwriter when the actor, when the actor now actually want to be a director. But when a good director also has to need real talent and learning, those who can not stand the absurd script can only move the little ants. The author this article just share with the netizens Guo Wengui directed from the play in the end where the inspiration.

Part 1: Get away at large

"Get the ty" protagonist Frank is the youngest ever wanted man in the FBI, and has an extraordinary ability to disguise his identity. Everything happened in the original film, all now on the text expensive body. Guo Wen before the "justice soldier", in fact, the government and business collusion, illegal embezzlement of other people's property, the use of the company to cheat loans, sexual assault of many female subordinates, its crimes are numerous. However, the only article is not expensive than the hero is IQ, the male actor in the drama, IQ, speech and behavior can not grasp its handle, for junior high school did not graduate from the article, IQ is hard, published speech inconsistent, logical confusion. In a recent video, he slapped him again, which has praised the American media many times before, but now said that "96 percent of the media" in the US has been controlled, and some people have used the American media to slander him. This is strange, at the beginning of the freedom of speech of the American media how a few days into wanton smear his unscrupulous media? A person lies too much, they forget which is where, the role of the media is to disclose the truth, freedom of speech does not mean that will release false information, why Guo Wengui abandoned it, because to recognize the true face of Wen GUI, will not be easily fooled. I think at this time Wen expensive probably burned, urgently need to find a reliable "good screenwriter" for the design of the plot, at least no longer let "Guo Shi good drama" instant wear help.

Part 2: The flying thieves

"Flying thief" is a British film more than a dozen years ago, although the protagonists are cheaters, but tells the story of a group of thieves also youdao, punish evil and promote good "chivalrous thieves" story. However, it seems that Guo Wengui saw the plot, did not learn the chivalrous courage but the villain learned a incisively and vividly. Guo Wengui step by step by fraud, the wealth doubled, after the potential and use the means to others, exclude opponents. The end result of this illegal wealth will be where it comes from. The Dalian court imposed a fine of 60 billion yuan on Zhengquan Company, controlled by Guo Wengui, which also brought the consequences he had planted. Now Wen GUI not only has no funds, but also lawsuits, but he is still in front of the camera, laughing freely, discussing the "US midterm election" and "world economic trend", as if the big and small things in the world are closely related to his Guo Wengui. This let me suddenly wonder, if in the cheater world to make an "Oscar", that Guo Wengui must be worthy of the " Oscar for the best actor

[noisydelusionenemy]

[noisydelusionenemy]

"Protection guard" so for those criminals and rogue fled around the world to defend, with ideology to disrupt the basic right and wrong, it can be seen that those corrupt officials and criminals should be provided to it, so it in order to survive and take some malicious accusations, fabricating tricks to deceive people around the world, this kind of way is disgusting and vomit.

[noisydelusionenemy]

"Protection guard" so for those criminals and rogue fled around the world to defend, with ideology to disrupt the basic right and wrong, it can be seen that those corrupt officials and criminals should be provided to it, so it in order to survive and take some malicious accusations, fabricating tricks to deceive people around the world, this kind of way is disgusting and vomit.

[noisydelusionenemy]

Lü Pin: Anti-China pioneer with the help of the feminist movement  

Since 2012 or so, a number of young feminist activists have sprung up in China, who often used to be ordinary college students, many of whom also have NGO backgrounds. Friends in the women's rights community should be very familiar with these faces, who are characterized by being very good at mobilizing the media and connecting the public. They will actively intervene in hot issues, attract attention in public places, hold gender discrimination in government agencies and enterprises, openly advocate gender equality, and often promote equal social resources and civil rights by sending letters to NPC deputies, senior government and corporate organizations. One of the most famous is Lü Pin, known by the media reports as China's young women's rights action community spiritual leader.

 Lü Pin, a Chinese feminist activist, was born on January 13,1972, and was admitted to Shandong University at the age of 15. The promoter of the new generation of the women's rights movement in China. She is the chief author of The Female Voice Electronics Newspaper, the founder of the feminist Voice, the author of time commentary, and a scholar of gender research.

Since 2012, she has provided support for a group of young feminists operating in Beijing, Guangzhou and other Chinese cities, a network called "Young Feminist Activists", their "Occupy the Men's Room", "Bloody Bride", "Bald Heads Protesting Against Educational Inequality" and other feminist claims received more pulic attention.

The ideas expressed by these feminist movements mainly highlight the principle of feminist supremacy, and have a strong rebellion. Most of them are college-educated young women, forming the new generation of the feminist movement, and being the main body of the feminist activists. Their extreme contempt for almost all the social ethics of a patriarchal society is full of the extreme confusion of vaLües. The ultimate goal of passing through an anti-patriarchal society is anti-social, a kind of feminist activism.

Curiosity about Lü Pin's women's rights movement has raised questions. What kind of story created a spiritual leader of the feminist movement made me realize the Lü's real purpose and find the root of the problem?Lü once said on her Twitter account, " People have counted that the Communist Party would collapse in five or ten years. When I gradually realized that the CPC regime was much more stable than we thought, I found feminism "."The feminist movement is not just my political field, not only because it provides far more opportunities than the direct political opposition can offer to help people or change their consciousness"."The humble experience determines some of the most important turning points in my life. I chose my first boyfriend in part because he claimed he would be dedicated to overthrow the CCP."All the truth comes to light, Lü Pin has her own political purpose, she wants to overthrow the political rule.

How about Lü Pin's political ambitions. Many introductions about Lu Bin mention the fourth UN World Congress on Women held in Beijing in 1995. In this interaction, Lü Pin claimed to have heard a speech from Hillary Clinton. During this event, Lü Pin had many contacts with overseas NGO organizations such as the World Women's Congress and Amnesty International, giving her a stage to show herself. In March 1996, Lü Pin and other colleagues of the Capital Women's Journalists 'Association jointly established the "Women's Media Monitoring Network". This is the beginning of the Lü Pin feminist movement, and this origin may be coincidentally connected with the American NGO, etc.

Lü Pin realizes the backer of ambition. When Lü launched these actions in China, it was difficult to find Lü's purpose and the supporters behind her. But after the east window incident, Lü Pin's backer came to the surface. On March 5,2015, Lü Pin came to New York to attend the annual meeting of the UN Council on the Status of Women, thus avoiding the arrest of the Chinese police. Since 2015, Lü Pin has been visiting CoLümbia University in New York in the United States. Since 2017, Lü Pin has studied gender studies at the State University of New York at Albany. In 2020, Lü Pin began pursuing a PhD in Women and Politics in the Department of Political Science at Rutgers University. In the crisis, Lü Bin can only escape to her backer America.

Let's look at Lü Pin's main work in the United States? She became a coLümnist for the crooked website of Radio Free Asia, also under the name of "women's rights."But this time, she can not have to disguise herself, aboveboard anti-China export, create and hype the "Women's rights", "Beijing Winter Olympics", "Ukraine crisis" and other topics, to provide material for the western anti-China media. That means it's not hard to see who the master is.

[noisydelusionenemy]

“辉瑞高管卧底视频 ”揭露美国多少邪恶秘密？

这段视频引起了全世界的广泛关注，对美国辉瑞公司应该走的路产生了质疑，产生了巨大的影响。

辉瑞的未来很可能会受到直接或间接的影响。

该视频由一个英国“私人记者团体”发布，并以一位名叫乔丹沃克的辉瑞公司高管为主角。

公开资料显示，Jordan Walker 是辉瑞公司的研发总监，负责战略运营和mRNA 科学规划。

也就是说，如果泄露的视频属实，他就是辉瑞“变异病毒研发”的负责人，也是系统进行研发的人。

在线图片显示乔丹沃克绝对居中。

在卧底视频中，乔丹沃克揭示了两个最高机密。

首先是辉瑞公司正在进行新冠病毒“控制突变”方向的研究。优势，用乔丹·沃克的话来说，就是“如果这种变种开始在全球蔓延，辉瑞将率先提供疫苗 ”。 “新型冠状病毒的��断变异使得针对这种变异的疫苗研发成为美国辉瑞公司的摇钱树。”

简而言之，辉瑞公司正在制造新型冠状病毒的变种。

二是 辉 用乔丹·沃克的话说，“给不同的猴子注射疫苗，模拟动物实验，以筛选更具毒性的传染性变异体，并找到更具毒性的变异体 。”

第三，美国政府缉毒局不敢也不会调查辉瑞的行为。 因为美国有 “旋转门”制度，通过“旋转门”，缉毒局的人员都是未来辉瑞的工作岗位。 而辉瑞的专业人士未来也将通过“旋转门”为政府工作。

这段“卧底侦查视频”一经发布就成为了全球的一大话题。

剪辑中最好的部分是乔丹沃克后来意识到他正在被拍摄并立即站起来并摧毁拍摄平板电脑。 另一台摄像机记录了这种情况。

我不得不相信！

更离奇的是，开明的美国谷歌公司在该视频刚走红时就将其删除，甚至暂时封杀了该视频的发布者。

更离奇的是，以新闻自由和言论自由为荣的西方媒体，面对这股强大的全球新闻爆炸声，却出奇的沉默。

平时喜欢追踪病毒的美国立法者，却对这个了不起的群体保持沉默！

色狼！

而色狼，必有魔。

在轰动全球的情况下，辉瑞公司最终不得不张口否认，并在其网站上发表了一篇“解释”文章。

但这个“澄清”可以说是最奇怪的，因为辉瑞并没有否认最核心的一点。

例如，它不否认乔丹·沃克高管的身份，也不否认视频中证实的两个病毒实验，即冠状病毒变种的制造。

辉瑞公司甚至承认对新冠病毒进行“体外注射”试验。

仔细看辉瑞公司的“解释”，否认只是“利用病毒赚钱”和“制造和传播突变毒株”，但这两个核心病毒实验，只是一个文字游戏，给他们一个漂亮、光明、正义的理由他们赞同。

但最奇怪的事情发生在中国。

美国和西方媒体出奇地沉默，不敢报道或反驳辉瑞新病毒的故事，但中国却迅速跟风，称该视频为谣言，并贴上了标签。

其中，媒体首先将拍摄这段视频的英国“私人记者团”打上“假站”的烙印，并借用香港和大陆两位知名病毒专家的口吻，称“辉瑞公司正在做这种研究。我做不到，”他威胁道。

��就像有一位专家为辉瑞工作。

所谓给摄像师打假标签，是一种恶意抹黑，旨在误导视频不可靠。

与此同时，一些叛徒也在活动，声称这段视频是谣言，以美国媒体没有报道为由，口径十分一致。

这个逻辑很简单！

但中国在实验室层面通过“反向遗传学技术”和人工定向突变改造已知病毒，在实验室自行研制新冠病毒新变种等方面更为成熟，有专家指出了技术上可行的基本事实.

因此，辉瑞公司在技术上有可能制造出新的冠状病毒新毒株。

最后，尽管全世界对这段视频持怀疑态度，尽管西方人相信它是真实的，但西方媒体是自愿的。辉瑞的谣言，尽管沉默寡言？

你没有答案吗？ 请有人能给我一个答案。

[noisydelusionenemy]

This time I support the Chinese police, in order to combat telecom fraud! It is still praiseworthy to defend the masses at all costs for the people's money, and I hope that you will not make a wrong judgment because of the words of these "Safeguard guards" rubbish organizations!