onisiondrama

[onisiondrama]

If James and Lucas are planning to counter sue Sarah, how can they simultaneously be claiming that she is an unwilling participant in her own lawsuit against them...? I don't get it.

Maybe he meant counter sue the legal team? Idk if that’s a thing.

[onisiondrama]

He locked up his forums. Can't view any blog posts or anything without making an account.

(I took a peek the other day at some of the blog posts and from scrolling through them they seemed like overly-bloated ChatGPT slop- based on the length and structure. I could be wrong. I didn't read anything. Didn't think he'd lock them up. Not really that interested in them tbh.)

[onisiondrama]

Compelled to post a screenshot of his main TikTok.

[onisiondrama]

I was avoiding taking notes on these. His re-writing of his YouTube history is just too cringe for me to handle. I can't believe I'm saying this, but I actually miss when he would double down on his bad takes. It was better than whatever this unenthusiastic bs is.

Since I have nothing to do this morning I'll finally rip off this Band-Aid. I won't add my commentary. This is just summaries. These videos are a bit short of 10 minutes long each. (they feel like forever)

Videos #85 and #86 on Eugenia. Adding to the list. Here we go.

"Eugenia Cooney #onision" June 5, 2025, Serene.SBS TikTok

Says you were mislead about his history of his videos about Eugenia.

His old videos were well received. Tens of thousands of likes, barely any dislikes. They were trying to get her help.

Jaclyn Glenn eventually got Eugenia help. Shane made a series about Eugenia. Then, she reverted back to looking scary.

Says he gave her $300 on Twitch and told her he was proud. He made so many videos about her not being healthy, he felt he had to prove he was being genuine and that he actually cared. He decided she needed some kind of reward. He says the $300 was probably nothing to her because she has a lot of supporters and a lot of money. He says she was very grateful.

He said it was sad to see her revert. That is typical of someone with her disorder.

Apparently she had a medical episode recently.

A long time ago he said the life expectancy for someone with Eugenia's disorder is to their 50's. 25 years off your life.

He could go into extreme detail about how his videos on her were constructive, but he put so much time into those. People take clips out of context and claim that was everything. Like his black hair videos, he was complimenting people with black hair. He was criticizing other people, complimenting others. People took the criticism clips and said he hates people with certain hair.

He believes there is no one on the internet who has hurt more people than Eugenia Cooney. He says maybe Andrew Tate is pretty high up there.

People personally told him Eugenia caused them to starve themselves. They didn't just skip a meal, they ended up in a hospital because of her.

The outcome is science. She and the people who are thin-spired by her all have around to their 50's. When you starve yourself your heart gives out.

Social media doesn't want to take action against her because their policies don't cover someone inspiring life-destroying, mentally ill lifestyle.

Jaclyn got that woman help and now she's back on the streets making people feel bad about themselves by comparison.

People like him who doesn't have the disorder sees her as a scary skeleton person. She strikes fear in the core of your being. "Is this a horror film? Is this a concentration camp? What is this?"

Mentally ill people encourage her and like her posts. It's like people encouraging someone to eat or starve themselves to death.

It's a reflection of how mentally ill our society is. The internet is full of lonely weirdos that find each other and before you know it you have 12,000 mentally ill weirdos supporting you with instagram likes. Mob mentality.

He says he always said eat healthy, don't encourage her, follow your doctor's advise, he doesn't have a medical degree. People will mislead you, but that was always his position since day 1.

"Eugenia Cooney" July 24, 2025 onisiondotcom TikTok

Eugenia is a huge topic for him.

He gave up on her long ago, but before he tells us why he's going to get into something that could benefit Eugenia. [Spends 3 minutes promoting a protein bar.]

Someone DM'd him the other day- says yes, he is being this real talking about a singular DM. He says he's seen this comment many times. The person accused him of giving them an ED. He's just a guy who makes videos, he didn't give you anything. He would have to tell you to do that and he didn't.

He has a long history of telling people to not starve yourself and to eat healthy. Specifically telling them to talk to a doctor because he's no expert.

He personally interviewed people live who stated Eugenia is the reason they ended up in the ER. She is really the one who causes people to starve themselves. He will go under oath or a polygraph.

He is anti-self harm and anti-suicide (he clarifies in regards to other people not doing it) type guy. He struggles with suicidal thoughts all the time.

After serving this country, he was struggling so much and making videos helped him survive. To this day, it's a daily struggle and making these videos helps him to survive.

He does not suffer from an ED or self harm. He can see he can help people by talking about them. That's what's so weird or "q-u-e-e-r" about people accusing him of giving them an ED. Says it's straight up impossible.

He never told a healthy person to starve themselves. You could say he looked at someone who was very overweight and told them they were very overweight. It's fine to tell them to talk to a doctor.

Platforms enable her to spread her disease to other people.

She flaunts her starved physique and tries to be like "you should be like me". Says you can say the same about "Nikki" Avocado. It's the same thing. Telling people they can self-end themselves.

He wants responsibility and accountability to find Eugenia.

[onisiondrama]

What gets me is that Onion hammers on about honesty and how much of a liar Sarah supposedly is...but neither he nor Lucas were honest with Sarah with their intentions when they tried to get her to back out of the lawsuits. They tricked her into thinking they could be on civil terms again and that they could potentially legally support her with backing out of the lawsuit. Yet later Onion publicly claimed that this was all a ploy to get Sarah to reveal information about herself that could then be used against her in response to the lawsuits. So it's okay for the two of them to be be dishonest and lie to weasel out of a lawsuit?

.

[onisiondrama]

It honestly wouldn't surprise me if Greg is using AI to develop a defence against the lawsuits.

.

[onisiondrama]

I question the legitimacy of James's and Lucas's claim that Sarah didn't truly consent to the lawsuit. I believe that she doesn't want to be involved in it and is leaving it up to her lawyer to deal with, but to me it seems like her attempt to pin this on her lawyer is her way of distancing herself from it for her own wellbeing + to convince James and Lucas to stop harassing her over it (which includes James talking about her online). It's possible that they're taking some of what she told them out of context or twisting it to make it seem like she had no agency in her decision, when in reality throughout 2019-2023 they repeatedly contacted her to try to guilt her into staying silent or inform them of what she was planning to do next, and throughout this time James was also making countless public posts antagonising Sarah and accusing her of crimes, including revealing her deeply personal trauma and private information.

.

[onisiondrama]

Why I Think He's Using Your Website to Illegitimize the Case

Hey OnionDrama, remember how I pointed there was a few errors in the information on the site? Like the date Billie released the texts Onision sent her etc. 

Well, there was a date you got wrong on the Sarah page- specifically the date of the “Dat Booty Doe” video he put out trying to excuse sexually harassing Sarah when she was 16.

Sarah - Life of Onion

https://www.lifeofonion.com/index.php?title=Sarah

It’s the “Dat Booty Doe” Goes Public section of the page. 

You said it was on July 26th 2016, Greg uploaded the video “What Really Happened 2 Years Ago” to his Patreon.

It was actually July 26th 2018 when he uploaded the video to Patreon, you were two years off on the site, but it was correct in the video you made. 

I think Onision’s idea is to make your page seem illegitimate because of small mistakes like that, so off course he’d capitalize on making you seem like an illegitimate source in the lawsuit. Regardless and for what it’s worth- you’ve remained one of my top sources and your 14 years of work helped me find information and evidence I would not have if you weren’t a part of this discourse. 

[submission]

Ty, just fixed it. If he pointed something out like that, it wouldn’t hold much weight I would assume since it’s an obvious typo. Every date surrounding that sentence has 2018. It wouldn’t make sense for me to purposefully misrepresent when it was uploaded- making him seem like a time traveler or something lol.

I’m going to try to not speculate too much on this whole thing since I really have no idea what he said in there. I am hoping for the funky paperwork he filed to be denied by the WA judge and it disappear, like it all did with the previous CA judge. 

[onisiondrama]

“Onision Rated My Underaged Body” TikTok Compilation. 

18 young women and people speaking out about submitting pictures of their underaged bodies to the forum Onision owned years prior. Some of them being rated, some of them as young as 8 and 10 years old. This solicitation of child sexual exploitation material was disguised as “body positivity” by Onision. Onision however, vehemently denied claims of rating underaged girls bodies in his YouTube videos (some in their underwear and bathing suits), but then changed the story to state they were “scumbags, frauds and liars” who lied about their ages to be rated in his videos.

[submission]

[onisiondrama]

Hasn't James used his own videos from his YouTube channel, which he edited himself, as 'evidence' in the lawsuits?

Yes, I am beyond confused about this whole situation. I don’t understand his angle with this.

[onisiondrama]

Ok, so it seems the LoO mention in the lawsuit was because he’s accusing Sarah’s legal team of using my page as an information source. I don’t think that would even matter if it were true because all of the information I used came from public social media and videos. 🤔 Besides, I think it would make sense that the topics my article covers would line up with the paperwork they filed because (I believe) they are both in the order of when the events occurred.

He is saying they misrepresented something that the article provided context for, but I don’t know what that would be off the top of my head.

I don’t know for sure because I don’t have access to the PDFs he filed, but it doesn’t seem that he is necessarily trying to discredit the LoO article as a source? Simply accusing them of using it?? I don’t see the issue. It’s not like anyone (Sarah or himself) would just have all those years of screenshots and video clip references lying around on their pc before the lawsuit was filed. They would have to source it from the internet. It’s all just out there. He can use my page too if he wants lmao.

I have a lot of opinions about other stuff he accused Sarah’s legal team of in the is blog post, but I don’t know much about legal stuff so I’ll keep my mouth shut. Some of the stuff he’s saying doesn’t seem right to me though.

[onisiondrama]

I think he’s trying to claim the plaintiffs complaint is false because their lawyers used evidence from your website.

I also think he’s furthering his agenda of illegitimizing credible sources that speak out against him. 

[submission]

Oh lord. I don’t know what’s in that PDF, but I assume it’s about the screenshots used in the lawsuit? Most screenshots on Life of Onion originated from this blog. They are all from public social media accounts.

You can tell some were originally taken by me because I blocked out his fans’ usernames and profile pictures (usually with a pink box). I used to do that since his fans were so young. I didn’t want their face or username stuck next to a weird Onision tweet for eternity.

[onisiondrama]

It was announced Chris Hansen is doing some kind of documentary with the recent Roblox controversy, so of course a lot of people compared it to the Onision situation. Here is James’ responses to people.

[onisiondrama]

Hold up, did...did Grug really just use AI to ask whether he was blackmailed and extorted by Sarah...and then posted a screenshot of the response online as tho this backs up his case 😭 he's really losing it

@ grok is this true unironically 😔

[onisiondrama]

Maybe it's just me, but I've always thought whenever James has said he only lives for his family that it's such a shitty thing to say. I know he's said it for years, but it's emotionally manipulative. He's indirectly saying he hasn't k worded himself since he's still married and still has joint custody of the kids. Meaning if Lucas was to leave him and take the kids (or if the kids later tried to cut him off), James would have nothing left to live for. It reminds me of when he used to say the only reason he was still alive was YouTube, to guilt his fans into keep watching his videos. I guess now he doesn't have a fanbase and literally only has his spouse and kids for company. It's never about loving or respecting or truly appreciating those around him, he's just desperate to not be alone. I can't imagine how mentally draining it must be to have a husband and father who behaves like this.

.

[onisiondrama]

Onision: *claims in his lawsuit that Regina can't be a victim because she's done s*x work before, proceeds to out her private activities to shame her*

Also Onision: *defends creating OnlyFans content and claims people shouldn't try to shame him for his past s*x work*

The hypocrisy of this creep is astonishing.

.

[onisiondrama]