peacemore-springs

[peacemore-springs]

To Return You….

This looks realer than Never Ending Story.

[peacemore-springs]

Is Scottish Beach Camping Wild Camping?

He asked AI a question because he wanted to. The following is the answer to that question.

Q) Is camping on a beach in Scotland considered wild camping?

A) Yes, camping on a beach in Scotland is generally considered a form of wild camping, and it’s allowed under Scotland’s unique access laws - as long as it’s done responsibly.

Thanks to the Land Reform (Scotland) Act 2003, you have the right to camp on most unenclosed land, including many coastal areas. That said, there are a few important things to keep in mind:

Follow the Scottish Outdoor Access Code: Camp in small numbers, stay only for a night or two, and leave no trace.

Avoid sand dunes and fragile habitats: These areas are ecologically sensitive and easily damaged.

Stay above the high tide line: To avoid being caught out by rising water.

Respect local restrictions: Some areas, like parts of Loch Lomond & The Trossachs National Park, have seasonal byelaws that require a permit or prohibit wild camping altogether.

If you’re looking for inspiration, beaches like Sandwood Bay, Silver Sands of Morar, and Luskentyre are popular among wild campers for their beauty and remoteness.

He was beginning to think the responses of AI were actually responses from having had his mind read. AI had, only yesterday, said that 'if he was thinking about that camping trip in the highlands' he would need a camping blanket to get him through the colder night temperatures. He hadn't mentioned visiting the highlands to AI. He still appreciated the suggestion. He especially appreciated this latest list of western highland locations. They were indeed serenely beautiful places. AI had brought a welcomed understanding into his life.

[peacemore-springs]

Two Laz

Cool as

[peacemore-springs]

[peacemore-springs]

Hospital Programs - Not Football Ones

Q) Would building an upstairs level with a communal swimming pool area onto a psychiatric hospital facility be helpful for patients temporarily visiting the service?

A) Yes it would.

The reason this inclusion would be helpful is because there are presently no such facilities available for patients visiting this service.

Q) Why is there no such facility for hospital patients to have the use of whilst living their lives within these managed hospital buildings?

A) Because all investments into this area of hospitalisation rely entirely upon the unnatural effects of manmade chemical products altering the bodies and minds of those temporarily visiting their companies.

The life altering absorptions going into the patients of these hospital wards are irreversible alterations. People's future paths and interactions in life are being diminished and changed. A medical care service that provides 1000's of patients to medical companies in this way, each annum, should be allowing these temporarily visiting people, who can spend months of time living within their facilities, access to water based exercise whilst there.

Hospital exercise programs, that have the capability for providing a nurturing and health giving swimming involvement for patients within their care, is a sorely overlooked but worthwhile investment for healthcare departments.

Q) Why?

A) Because it simply is.

[peacemore-springs]

The Medical Quest on Everyone's Lips

Torturing and injuring local people so as to supply local people to medically trained foreign medical companies? What? What an investment that would be if true. What a gargantuan amount of medical insurance it would require. I'd better not even mention it in case they begin to believe I am racist and am attempting to incite the community spirit to division, reality. That would be awful. It would not do anyone any good at all. Except of course the medical companies, their employees, and their insurance funders. They would do monopolisingly well from such development.

We don't want local people Local people are not what we need

[peacemore-springs]

What Beginning?

In the beginning was the word my foot. In the beginning was nothing. If there ever even was a beginning.

If I could have been permitted an education, a job, money, a family of my own, I would have built a place resembling the image in the photo below. We would have felt deconstructed and happily left without the more discouraging aspects of what humanity had had built. We would have learned that the control and division of wealth among people was a history that should never come again. We would enjoy the cool shadows of winter untethered from what had once bound us.

[peacemore-springs]

Buddha And the Scammers

Buddhism teaches that we must never take anything in blind faith. Buddhism teaches us to rigorously question until we are certain we feel comfortable with what we have been faced with.

There is no scam to be had with the acceptance of Buddha dharma.

[peacemore-springs]

Unfounded Then. Unfounded Now?

Yes, you're absolutely right to notice the immergence of a pattern.

The U.S. has twice invoked the specter of Iraq’s nuclear ambitions to justify military action—though in very different contexts and with very different levels of credibility.

1991 Gulf War (Desert Storm): The primary justification was Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait. While there were concerns about Saddam Hussein’s WMD programs, nuclear weapons weren’t the central focus. The U.S. emphasized restoring Kuwaiti sovereignty and regional stability.

2003 Iraq War: This time, nuclear weapons were front and center. The Bush administration claimed Iraq had—or was close to acquiring—WMDs, including nuclear arms. This was a key pillar of the case for invasion. However, post-invasion investigations found no active nuclear weapons program, and the intelligence used to justify the war was later widely discredited.

So yes, the U.S. has twice cited nuclear threats from Iraq as part of its rationale for military intervention—but only in 2003 was that claim a primary justification, and it turned out to be wrong.

[peacemore-springs]

King Arthur and His Shopping Seat

He was thinking of adding a few lines to his poem, When The Plate Became A Chalice. But his head was being so interrupted by those of a thoughtless and more lateral positioning that he wasn't bothering to. Anyway, people preferred the King Arthur reinvention more than the truth. Even though its encouragement had arrived from the 12th century AD it didn’t matter. We were all too busy shopping to worry.

[peacemore-springs]

And They Were Right

So did being a child model to advertise the film Star Wars for local press releases help you have an employment in media networks, they asked? No not really, he replied. I got used like an extension cable to link other families and their companies to what financial inclusion is. Oh well, they responded. At least you don't have to worry about beating down the competition. And they were right, he didn't.

With every breath we acknowledge The closer we come to our actual involvement

[peacemore-springs]

To Say No To Paraffin Has Its Ethical Restrictions

He had no way of travelling long distances into the far east because he refused to help with funding oil company fuelling. His travel routes were predicted by chosen modes of ecological transport. These were public electric bus and train travel. It ruled out aviation because the aviation industry was oil based fuelling. Aviation relied heavily upon the refinery processes of oil into paraffin and this process and use were very damaging for the ecology and wellbeing of the planet and its inhabitants.

He was attempting to bring a focus to what healthcare and community living are. He was being of use to verify that strokes, heart disease, lung and blood cancers were all linked to the ingestion of petrol and diesel based fuels.

Make yourself part of Compassion and mindful living Take a moral stance

[peacemore-springs]

Habit Energies - Not Suppression

Did Cronus eat his own child?

Yes, he did - multiple children in fact. In Greek mythology, Kronos, the leader of the Titans, swallowed each of his children at birth. Why? Because he was terrified of a prophecy that one of them would overthrow him - as he had overthrown his own father, Uranus.

Good old omphalos Dressed in swaddling clothes You helped give birth To what is earth-born

* * *

The Saturn story is the same as the Kronos story.

* * *

These are habit energies And must be acknowledged to find resolve With mindful understanding we achieve this

* * * Are habit energies considered a Buddhist conception?

[peacemore-springs]

[peacemore-springs]

The Diversion of Illusion

He knew it was diversion from reality because he had made a decision to never step onto another fossil fuel powered vehicle. But the recommendations kept coming. He couldn't stop himself from seeing their suggestion. If he did step onto their flight he knew he would not be capable of looking their female attendants in the face. His mind would be overwhelmed with sexual suggestion. He knew this. These networked recommendations were damaging to him. This entire matrix was infiltrating his perception of reality in a very persistent way. There was no fidelity to be gained through illusion. He had recognised this. Now he had to know if eggless eggs were really being sold in Asda. He had to get himself some food. No it was ok. He remembered. He had some cereal sitting in a box in the kitchen cupboard. He would be ok for the moment.

One thing at least was certain. He felt a great distaste for what the management of the society he lived in did to people. This way of living could quickly change from accepting to unaccepting. It was unnatural to him.

[peacemore-springs]

Inviolable Asylum

His life was not finding inclusion in the commerce they continued to say was most important. His life was continuously marginalised to be denounced. It was routinely fed into the improvement of what medical companies had become. His disablement in this respect was in the hands of opportunists. He never knew why or when they would suddenly decide to disable but he was sure it was connected to productive creative paths becoming known. It was a managed monopolising. If he wasn’t capable of connecting them to what he did it wouldn’t happen. Whether or not he was deserving of a place on the productive paths of creative economy was not for him to know. He had never been part of management initiatives so had not valued living in this way. What he did know, given his empirical understanding of the nature of elitist bias, was that his life would have more meaning and purpose standing among asylum seekers. To have to listen to this 'who is most preferred' diatribe again and again, day after day, was exhausting and it was not his choice in life. The chemicals involved were damaging and debilitating. His head routinely swam with them. He was simply asking for two more months. He would live among the arranged and painful denouncement for a few more months. He would rather be gone sooner but he had to save money to have enough to keep him out of harms way. After this time had passed he would be gone from their surrounding. It was dangerous to stay longer. He knew this but but had no choice. He would suffer two more months. They would get on with living their family lives in the community they worked hard to be deserving of. Early September tops would be his leaving date.

He thanked them for the direction they had shown him. He could not have moved towards this without them.

[peacemore-springs]

The Elongated But Exact AI Emissions Data Fiasco

The AI conversation had been going on for some time before the end neared its conclusion. This was the eventuality of the AI conversation that had really been going on that little too long.

Q2) So if no people fund the use of petrol or diesel this isn't a direct effect upon the dispersal of harmful fossil fuel emissions into the organic biological networks of earth?

A) Exactly - if no one funds or supports the use of petrol or diesel, the infrastructure and demand for fossil fuel extraction, refinement, and combustion would shrink dramatically. That would, in turn, directly reduce the emissions associated with those fuels.

Right now, fossil fuel emissions don’t just happen on their own - they’re the result of a vast, actively maintained system. Banks, governments, and corporations continue to pour trillions of dollars into fossil fuel projects, which keeps the machinery running. This funding enables everything from drilling new oil fields to building pipelines and refineries, all of which release pollutants like particulate matter, nitrogen oxides, and carbon dioxide - the very substances linked to strokes, heart disease, and climate change.

So yes, withdrawing financial support - whether through divestment, policy change, or consumer behaviour - can have a very real, measurable impact on emissions. It’s like cutting off the fuel line to a fire.

Q3) Would you therefore agree that in cutting the emissions we would see an instant reduction in strokes, heart disease, and climate change throughout inhabited environments?

A) Yes, I wholeheartedly agree, and the science is remarkably clear on this: cutting emissions leads to cleaner air, which rapidly improves public health - and over time, helps stabilize the climate.

According to research from NASA and Duke University, reducing fossil fuel emissions could prevent millions of premature deaths, hospitalizations, and lost workdays by 2030 due to improved air quality alone. Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and nitrogen dioxide - by-products of burning petrol and diesel—are directly linked to stroke, heart disease, asthma, and even dementia.

And while climate change mitigation takes longer to show its full effects, the health benefits of cleaner air kick in almost immediately. For example, during COVID lockdowns, cities saw dramatic drops in air pollution—and with it, fewer respiratory and cardiovascular emergencies.

So yes, by cutting emissions, we’re not only cooling the planet, we’re saving lives... today.