quoigenic-anon

[quoigenic-anon]

Psi has deleted that ask, but it's still drilling in the back of my mind. Anti willo anon picked a good timing, exactly when I was triggered and felt unsafe. So, here's your bit of my attention, congratulations.

If you call your anti willo behavior the same kind of (pro endo) activism as pro queer and pro trans, I'm audibly laughing at you, because you're not in the same level of danger for "standing up".

(TW: abusive and manipulative behavior, Russian government making shitty decisions)

It was my mistake to bring up LGBT in the discussion with my homophobic mother, but I did it, and she got so mad she threatened my autonomy. She tried to pressure me into not moving out (to study in my dream university) so I would have no choice but to stay in this house with her and change my values. She also implied she'd do something with my freedom of being on the Internet with my "weird" friends. Important note: I'm 18. I'm legally an adult.

Why did I bring up LGBT? Because god damn, soon there will be a law that prohibits you SEEKING and READING extremist materials.

And, as you can remember, LGBT movement is an extremist organization in Russia. And there also were discussions of claiming extremist such movements (which are even hard to call movements) as child-free, quadrobers, femboys. There's also a huuuuge list of extremist materials, it's so huge you can just easily have no idea that what you're reading is extremist. And if police stops you to check your phone, even a search in browser can be enough to get a punishment (administrative, such as fee, but you know, it's not that hard to escalate if needed). Also, if you're subscribed to an extremist (... who can be literally just a celebrity), you can also be considered involved in extremism. Yeah, they'll have to prove the intent as a component of violation, but... It's all complicated and blurry.

I'm not even sure if making a petition is SAFE.

Welcome to 1984, Orwell, thoughtcrimes, you get the gist. They're so focused on protecting "traditional values" that it's getting absurd.

So, if I ever disappear from the Internet, you know why.

I'm fucking laughing at that anon. Tell me I'm homophobic, transphobic, etc. Come on, say that right into my demigirl asexual face. If I was homophobic and transphobic, I would be more protected by law than I am right now. It would be so much easier, my worries would immediately disappear!

Because I wouldn't live in constant anxiety for my future and autonomy.

[quoigenic-anon]

appreciation post <3 i am feeling cheesy. not as many people i would like, but if you're not here, you are STLL SO APPRECIATED !!! AUGHHH!!! I LOVE YOU!!!

@thecircularsystem : you have been an amazing friend and educator ! stunning , awesome , beautiful ! i have learned so much from you and i cannot appreciate you enough for being apart of my life <3

@ellipse-society just seeing you in the server makes me so happy <3 i love seeing what you have to say and you're SO SWEET!!!! :D ilu /p

@cambriancrew you have taught me a lot about tulpamancy and have educated me on western tulpa ! omg i cannot thank you enough for not only improving , but educating me as a tibetan person <3 i have learned a lot about tulpamancy through you and i have seen just SO much love from your blog <3

@chaos-in-one i have known about you for a long time ! you have given me the love for foxes (hehe but true!) and you taught me a lot about OSDD !!!! your posts given me more things to think and research about <3 i love you for it <3

@sysmedsaresexist you have given me much resources and education ! learning has been a big part of your blog and i cant help but appreciate it <3

@quoigenic-anon you are SUCH a breath of fresh air <3 i love your posts and you have educated me on other countries ! you are AWESOME !!! keep being you <3

[quoigenic-anon]

Hi, Psi here.

Kirena's formation was a surprise indeed. Pixel (Q) really freaked out and went into denial when she heard Kirena's first words. We never expected a newcomer, we didn't know it was possible at all for us.

(With some retrospection, yeah, it was indeed possible all this time, it was simply considered "a phase we overgrew" before.)

I'd rather say, due to our specifics and late formation, our collective is quite host-centric right now. We plan to change it as soon as we move out, but for now it's the most stable model. And more people in this equation really would cause more distraction and even distress, because Pixel cares about us, sometimes even more than about herself.

But I'm here to handle it if needed, just like with Kirena's situation.

i think the different reactions to splitting among more simple systems and polyfragmented systems is interesting.

among more simple systems, it's usually a big deal. it's an event, it's destabilizing maybe, it is a notable change.

but if a system is polyfragmented, like we are, i noticed it's much more casual? like it's just another tuesday. although splits are becoming a bit slower for us.

how does your system feel about splits? is it a big deal? or is it another tuesday? feel free to let me know.

[quoigenic-anon]

However, if a singlet has mistaken their experience for plurality and considered themself plural at some point, their participation is still valuable. We need normalization of misinterpreting personal experience. They should not be considered invaders because of it.

Sorry for recent relative inacitivity!!

We have been working on our BAH blog super hard (sly, shameless self-promo...zillyhoo-bah...) and haven't been posting a lot on this account!!

Here's some more recent syscourse opinion(s) of ours:

✶ Polyminds are valid if they wanna call themselves that, plurality is different for everybody!!

✶ Anti-endos usually just have a lot of hate in their hearts that people don't have to "suffer" like they do to be plural and often end up watering down CDDs to "plurality disorders" with their insistence that plurality is disordered-only despite also claiming CDDs aren't "alter disorders" (which they aren't, they are much more complex than that)

✶ This is just kind of a fact, PluralKit and SimplyPlural are pro-endo! So is Tupperbox (hence the tul! prefix for command, it was originally for tulpas)! All of them can be used by anyone, not just plurals (as stated by the people who made them!!)

✶ Singlets shouldn't really be involved in syscourse, it's not your experiences and it's not your place to "choose a side" one way or the other

✶ And the obligatory, all plurality is valid, BAH blogs are awesome, believe people's personal experiences, the brain is weird!

-Jay (💀)

[quoigenic-anon]

re: that one post that's going back and forth idk i just don't think it's appropriate to shame traumatized people about not having Whimsy And Joy no matter what the context or whether you are traumatized yourself tbh. like at the very least that's a fucking cruel thing to do, whether the rest of the post is good or not.

sigh genuinely I'm just going to throw this post in the tag and go to sleep. I'm kinda over this.

[quoigenic-anon]

You're welcome, I guess. I suspect I'm also autistic (and in combo with possible ADHD I have to read VERY CAREFULLY so I don't miss a point) and I genuinely love languages... So it's very important to me.

If you didn't continue this conversation, I would, really.

An observation I've made is anti-endos emphasizing "suffering", i.e "UR COSPLAYING A SERIOUS AND TRAUMATIC DISORDER!!"

.. where is your whimsy.. your happiness..

[quoigenic-anon]

Okay, sorry to chime in, but the original post is poorly worded. You cannot get the implication of "anti endos tend to get upset" paragraph, because it's not there. It's not written there.

All the post says is "anti endos emphasize suffering, where is their whimsy?". That's all, and that's why people in reblogs (not even anti endos!) got upset.

I'm sorry, but there really is a difference between what you mean and what you say, because people only see the latter and react to the latter.

An observation I've made is anti-endos emphasizing "suffering", i.e "UR COSPLAYING A SERIOUS AND TRAUMATIC DISORDER!!"

.. where is your whimsy.. your happiness..

[quoigenic-anon]

An observation I've made is anti-endos emphasizing "suffering", i.e "UR COSPLAYING A SERIOUS AND TRAUMATIC DISORDER!!"

.. where is your whimsy.. your happiness..

[quoigenic-anon]

I genuinely wish it actually worked with anons in my askbox! I gathered 8 hate asks, blocked them all, and I'm still getting at least one after every post and sometimes even after commenting!

Please block people.

[quoigenic-anon]

You don't have to constantly talk, post about current (negative) events, you don't have to constantly consume and digest news, posts, any content about them.

It's called fucking doomscrolling, and it's not good for your mental health, you hear me?

You're not supposed to feel like a very bad person when you choose to not read a news article about ongoing war or politics.

You're not supposed to feel extremely guilty when you don't have any means to donate to fundraisers.

Choosing your own mental health is better than burning yourself with negative news because you don't want to be called a privileged, ignorant, bad person for skipping.

UPD: it also doesn't make you a bad person if you choose arguing in the Internet as a way of escapism. It at least can give you a sense of control that news articles and politics post on the Internet cannot give you.

[quoigenic-anon]

Your daily reminder...

You do not need to post about things to care about them. "I see you not reblogging" is guilt-tripping.

You're allowed to curate your own blog. "I don't care if this doesn't fit your blog aesthetic" is guilt-tripping.

You're allowed to skip pasts posts that distress you. "x amount of people must reblog" is guilt-tripping.

Permission is not needed but for those whom it will make more comfortable; you are allowed to block people who post bullcrap that makes you feel guilty.

This post has no DNI; everyone may reblog regardless of syscourse stance, but reblogs are not required. Spread love.

− Helena, she/her, Emotional Protector from within the Cerberus collective Rylas, he/they, Tulpa and caretaker from within the Cerberus collective

[quoigenic-anon]

hello this is an ask: what's your favourite syscourse topic

Erm. I don't know!

I genuinely enjoyed reconstructing some words in syscourse, doing linguistic stuff. But it's not very needed right now.

I just enjoy any topic that I can participate in. And it's less than you'd think! Headspace discourse, BAH discourse, persecutor discourse? I prefer speaking when I have my own experience in the topic, so these are closed for me (for the best, I guess).

[quoigenic-anon]

Sorry not sorry, "new gen" of syscourse is kind of overwhelming for me. And it makes me upset a bit.

Anyone with the same feeling? Can you put in words why?

[quoigenic-anon]

Hot take: if you're pro and you're constantly talking about antis in main tags, you're not so different from antis constantly talking about pros in main tags.

I emphasize: constantly. And in main tags.

[quoigenic-anon]

Hey so why haven't people realized that sometimes the reason younger kids/teens will "fake*" having a CDD is because they aren't told/constantly see people deny that there's any other form of plurality, and they want to put a label on their experiences, so they choose a CDD.

Maybe if people were told about other forms of plurality, anyone mislabeling themselves as having a CDD (no, mixed origins do not count as mislabeling they can still have CDDs) would be much less likely to because they'd have other labels to use.

Especially because of how important labels are seen in society (which I have my own problems with but I won't get into that), kids and teens especially are often desperate for a nice label to slap on their experiences because they think they need one, and having access to a variety of labels spanning multiple origins would most likely reduce mislabeling.

TLDR: stop getting angry at people for mislabeling themselves as having a CDD because they don't know/were convinced against other plural origin labels existed.

*They aren't faking, they've just mislabeled themselves, something that everyone has done at least once in their life and is a very natural, human experience

[quoigenic-anon]

i think one good skill to learn is trying to figure out what someone is trying to say, regardless of how they're trying to say it.

i'm not saying you can't criticize the approach. but sometimes a good point is in someone who can't convey it well for whatever reason. anyone can have language difficulties.

and sometimes, a really awful point is wrapped up in an approach that's really appealing. and if you don't have practice with figuring out the point beyond the approach, you may find yourself in circles filled with people you fundamentally disagree with.

so, i think learning how to figure out the point regardless of how it's dressed up is a good skill to learn.

[quoigenic-anon]

Who was going to tell me endo-safe-block-list is still here and posting.

How sad it is that they actually sometimes post decent warnings, but it's 1 okay post for 10 stupid BS.