scp-confessions
scp-confessions
SCP confessions
57 posts
Last active 60 minutes ago
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
scp-confessions · 1 day ago
Note
Actually so sad there's a glitch on the wiki for emails with numbers because I want that cookie (the wiki) so fucking bad. I can only lurk silently and not add my own contributions
Thank you for your submission
4 notes · View notes
scp-confessions · 1 day ago
Note
Not anti-bright btw but like he makes me so mentally ill. Like I've been hyperfixating on him for over half a year now and I'll probably have to start meditating semi-regularly or else I'll go insane
Thank you for your submission.
3 notes · View notes
scp-confessions · 2 days ago
Note
i hate djkaktus because he's never written a sincere word in his life and he reeks of white privilege. if you want to see an author whose never known a day of hardship in his life read his shitty conan fanfic.
Thank you for your submission
3 notes · View notes
scp-confessions · 2 days ago
Note
I don't care for 999, like I get the whole premise of it being wholesome, but I feel like it's kinda over used. Like I'm just saying there's way better feel good scps (scp 3092 come back to me)
Thank you for your submission
5 notes · View notes
scp-confessions · 2 days ago
Note
lowkey annoying how clight is clef and bright’s shipname because then what the hell am I supposed to tag ship art of clef and light with
Thank you for your submission
8 notes · View notes
scp-confessions · 2 days ago
Note
Rule added:
If one wishes to challenge another person's views, their submission has to contain a meaningful contribution to the debate.
Failure to do so will result in the submission being deleted.
You should definitely add a rule that stops people from making asks to 'attack' other anons. I feel like we all need it
There have been internal debates on how to properly implement this, as some submissions definitely attack previous ones, although some seem to debate them, which shouldn't be disallowed.
We wish to ask our audience:
5 notes · View notes
scp-confessions · 3 days ago
Note
Bright is my candle haired wife
Thank you for your submission
4 notes · View notes
scp-confessions · 3 days ago
Note
I think it’s funny that the mobile task force is called mtf because the only way my brain can translate mtf is male-to-female. So whenever I’m reading about anything SCP related and mtf is mentioned, all I can think about is trans women.
My humour is horrible, also this is in no way against trans people (especially not trans women, I love women🩷🤍🧡).
Thank you for your submission
7 notes · View notes
scp-confessions · 3 days ago
Note
Can people explain like im a 3 y/o what on sife off site means??? Aren't we all on site fan ciase we need to read the lore there??? Or on site means you hav am account there??? Im confused 💀
"On site" and "Off site" Is not referring to the Website of the Foundation, but rather a Site like Site-19 or Site-42
Using Site-19 as an example:
If an incident occurs on site, it happened at Site-19.
An on site researcher might be eaten by SCP-682 at Site-19.
An SCP Object which breached containment, as happens often at Site-19, will may move off site.
(This example does not imply incompetence of Site-19 personnel.)
6 notes · View notes
scp-confessions · 3 days ago
Note
You should definitely add a rule that stops people from making asks to 'attack' other anons. I feel like we all need it
There have been internal debates on how to properly implement this, as some submissions definitely attack previous ones, although some seem to debate them, which shouldn't be disallowed.
We wish to ask our audience:
5 notes · View notes
scp-confessions · 4 days ago
Note
I hope brights dad burnssssss
Thank you for your submission
2 notes · View notes
scp-confessions · 4 days ago
Note
the wiki needs an egg
What do you know???
Thank you for your submission.
3 notes · View notes
scp-confessions · 4 days ago
Text
Ask containing:
---------------------------------------
"Bright Drama does not need to come back because of this blog"
---------------------------------------
Was mistakenly deleted.
Answer:
The controversy surrounding Dr. Bright and his author remains hotly debated in spaces beyond this account.
It is not for us at this account to keep certain submissions under wraps because of controversial topics they might contain and we make efforts to never include our own personal thoughts on those subjects.
We tag these topics accordingly to ensure people sensitive to them may filter them.
If you wish to no longer see those submissions, or not see this blog at all, we recommend blocking tags or this account.
Thank you
3 notes · View notes
scp-confessions · 4 days ago
Note
Uncertain if i can make tag requests for something just posted.
https://www.tumblr.com/scp-confessions/785991333515051008/im-gonna-say-it-and-i-know-a-crowd-of-people-are?source=share
I'm the one behind this and I want to say I'm not anti Bright I'm against the creator and believe that the anti Bright stance is too heavily built on harassment to be effective.
Long story short I don't agree with the anti bright tag being placed if that makes sense? Although Bright drama of course yes. The point of me saying that was to point out the "fuck you. NO FUCK YOU NOW SHUT UP" behavior I see too often among anti bright people.
Also thank the Long Fish for you mod(s) your presence is cathartic and I apologize for any discomfort you (all) feel because of having to read the discourse that is sent in.
Have a cookie.
🍪
Tag removed, subject to being re-added at potential requests
1 note · View note
scp-confessions · 4 days ago
Note
I'm gonna say it. and I know a crowd of people are gonna shit on me and throw stones at me for it...
I completely understand wanting the Bright character removed entirely.
WHAT I DO NOT UNDERSTAND is the fucking harassment anti Bright people will stoop to.
claiming to protect victims while some who use the character ARE victims themselves is counterintuitive. not to mention SOME of the people you harass in your whole "fuck the admin and their shitty self insert too" (again, while not wrong in theory, but in the way it is practiced) are people who DON'T choose to hold a connection to it; unwilling fictionkin, fictives, I could go on. I myself am a damn Bright fictive. Do I hate my source creator and my 'canon' actions? OF COURSE.
that's why the discourse pisses me off so much.
I'VE HAD PEOPLE TELL ME TO "just identify as my rewrite" I CAN'T. Wanna know why? CAUSE HE'S HERE TOO. And I am nothing like him.
Harassment never FIXES anything.
And that's why the anti bright people piss me off.
I understand their ideology of not wanting to use a pedophile's self insert, but if you stoop to HARASSING people, you immediately lose any 'righteousness' in your movement.
If above all else this means just blocking people who are pro bright to better curate your space? Then you fucking do that. Stop fucking shitting on and screaming at people who have experiences you know NOTHING about. People will use the characters they want to, I know that means having a shitty creator behind them at some times; but trying to FORCE someone to change doesn't fucking work.
Thank you for your submission
5 notes · View notes
scp-confessions · 4 days ago
Note
Long, dramatic sigh… I have a massive crush on 173 and 049
Part of me is ashamed to admit this but another part is not
Thank you for your submission
6 notes · View notes
scp-confessions · 4 days ago
Note
It need to be studied the corelation between mtf (mobile task force) fans are the most biggoted dick bags that sometimes step into fascist shit in this fandom (espetialy on tiktok cuase of course it tiktok)
As a fandom can we publicly execute this extremist wierdos!!
Thank you for your submission
6 notes · View notes